hey man, I dig what your doin here and all but taking advantage of peoples stupidity is just plain and simply wrong. still though I love the whole mysticism about it all and it's a good watch. It's like watching a cool movie. But in REALITY it's just pretend. Theres really people who would tell you Paul is dead even they had a gun to their head. Well, keep making vids but try not to profit too much on the absence of common sense in the general population of todays society:-) Cheers
He walked into the large dining room and saw a wall of people's backs in front of him. Tip toeing to look over their shoulders, Vernon could see Ian sitting at an upright piano, plunging the keys as he led the crowd in a raucous chorus of what's the use of WORRYING, it NEVER was worthwhile, HEY!....
This can NOT be the penultimate end of IAAP's expose... but every day that ends without a follow-up places only more expectation on the impending new addition... which surely must come...
...and....who can explain me the meaning of the old video called "iamaphoney CD" or something like this (I don't remember really the exact title of that video).
I'm so sorry for my english 'cause I'm italian.
P.S.: The fab four, you know, it's possible that themselves were kidding about this question and about many others things which made the history like (as you shown us) fake moustaches?
Iamaphoney, from the rotten apple number 50 that you posted, this "ununderstanding" videos like this...: what does it mean a man who is swimming completely weared and is walking backwords with a bag? And what about the pale which the man (that I think are you) hails? Is this the place where Paul was buried? Where can someone find other clues? Since when you begin to speak about Paul's legam with crowley and satanism (even if crowly is a magician and not a satanist) I begin to understand nothing
the brief clips of papers have stuff to do with lennons writing in some way.. ive rea about people accusing this guy to be lennon reincarnated on a mission to reveal pauls accident but that sounds too farfetched
Molech eh? Like on the dollar bill and at the Boho Grove.
Somebody on NIR cracked the LILY thing or at least came up with a very plausible explanation - I haven't been there for a while, though, can't remember details.
The level of scholarship at NIR is at its very best, appalling. That's about the nicest thing you could say about the work that is done there. The bulk of the focus is based on weak photographic examples, which undermine their very premise by their own weakness. I'd be happy to provide numerous details if asked.
There are some VERY quick subliminals at the start - I accidentally caught one when changing pages. I came back and found two, one is a b/w photo of a man with glasses and a moustache at 0:04.
Fuckin Sad, this is nothing but a damn ARG, wake up people, whether Paul is Dead or not has nothing to do whatsoever with IAAP, or his fake briefcases, how long has this bozo been running you all in circles now? Sad.
I'm a follower of your vids, but I'm sorry. This one was absolutely pointless. On the good side, you are improving your editing and shooting skills. Nice car plate :)
These are the symbols you can find at the end of the title of some of Iamaphoney's videos:
T , o or 0 ,Q ,A,a,u,n,r,p,A,U,L,9,2,2,0,0,8,5,O,C,L,K,i,n,d,a,n,g,r
It's sorted from his latest to earliest videos. You can read: indangr , sounds like in Danger, is Macca in danger? Also you can see a lot of numbers. Who can see more in these letters? Please respond!
Good question. Nobody knows. IAAP has revealed nothing about the suitcase and he also has revealed nothing about the so-called "code" that he cracked in the Beatles "Love" album.
I'm beginning to think there is noting to the suitcase and there is no code in the "Love" album.
there was a first suitcase. it contained a copy of the book of the law and an LP of the magic christian, with a few scribbles here and there, and a clue IAAP said was "missed"
I beginning to think that also. I think he's just riding the PID rumour and suggesting that he has new evidence or some shockig revaltion when he really doesn't.
Instead, he'll just hint at certain things and make obscure videos to keep everyone interested and continue to promise something big when nothing comes.
Dude, you seriously have too much time on your hands if you have the time to make and post over a hundred Rotten Apple videos. Paul isn't dead and everyone knows it. That whole "Paul is dead" thing was a myth. You know it, I know it, and the world knows it. Move on with your life dude... Seriously. -_-
If you can't trust a heavy metal meth head high-school dropout who still lives with his mommy and who uses "dude" for every tenth word that comes out of his mouth -- because "dude" represents ten percent of his vocabulary -- whom can you trust in these troubled times?
What's the message that you would have preferred for me to attack in lieu of the messenger anyway? "Dude"? What am I supposed to say in response to "dude"?
Or is the message "Paul isn't dead and everyone knows it"? Man, how do you respond to THAT incisive reasoning?
You don't doubt that I've given an accurate demographic picture of the messenger, do you?
.paul had those big glasses on.and they just walked right .also there was some people in the limo.thats weird i would have sweared it was a old lennon.i know it cant be but still i looked into his eyes.
for all I know - I 6e 66 - is a part of the peppercode it also sure looks like he put mal evans personal papers in the briefcase I will go this weekend anyone care to come?
I can't say it's a larger or smaller matter, compared to the JFK conspiracy. I see these things as being parts of the same blanket; where the only thing larger than any one of them, is the blanket itself.
It makes sense that the conspiracy theories should start to tie into one another. The very premise of conspiracy theories is that there are no facts that back up the claims because the facts are being covered up by the conspiracy. Given that CT's all rely on this same convenient premise, it is no surprise that they become connected in some way.
While Mossad agents working for a phoney moving company filmed & celebrated & police officers at the scene told people to move back because the building (#7) was about to 'blow up'.
This is not a CT. In fact, an extensive and independent criminal investigation proved it and uncovered precisely where the money came from. There has never been any independent criminal investigation that has found any other plausible source for the crime.
The 9/11 Commission Report? How fast did the south tower collapse? The Report says 10 seconds. What happened to WTC 7? It doesn't even mention WTC 7. Extensive? What about the put-options? The Report claims the put-options are not important because the trail doesn't lead back to their prime suspects. LOL! An extensive & independent criminal investigation does not set out w/a theory in place, suspects in mind, and it doesn't go about fitting the data to the theory... no sir. watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
First, the investigation uncovered that the suspects were not those whom were initially considered to be responsible. Rather, it was discovered that the actual plotting took place in Germany and that most financing came through the United Arab Emirates. This was contrary to the official line undertaken by the government in their quest to invade Afghanistan. So your point about seeting out with a theory in place is groundless.
As for your points regarding the collapses, keep in mind that I am not a structural engineer nor do I have any experience in building collapse forensics. All I can say is that no one who does have such experience have produced any credible argument that confirms the CT argument. If you could find one that does, I'd be happy to examine it. Certainly, one cannot gain such experience by spending a few hours on the internet.
U cited the official report- it claims the s. tower collapsed in 10 secs., even people who argue hardest for the official CT (bin laden & boys) know that this is a laughable number & cite 15-18 secs instead. Your "extensive" report flubbed that & doesn't even mention the 47 story WTC7. So, I mean c'mon. Really. Bldgs. don't turn to powder bcause the tops catch on fire. U don't need to be an egineer to know that. But it looks like ur already pretty attached to ur fav CT so I digress.
If you're still talking about the 9/11 Commission, that is certainly not the official report on the scientific facts of the event, which can be found in the extensively documented NIST report, which is a crucial read and includes a lot of information about WTC 7. It renders absurd any notion that there was any conspiracy behind the text, and I highly suggest reading it.
And, yes, you do need to have a solid understanding of the subject you are discussing and not just believe random comments on the internet before coming to your conclusions. The fact that you don't think so, and simultaneously disagree with the opinion of every scientific body, structural engineer, and forensic scientist in building collapse (an actual field) on the matter, speaks volumes.
I would suggest u do some actual research- & not cling to & defend the paranoid CT about muslim boogeimen as if it's gospel, assuming everything else to be misinformed or underinformed rubbish as u obviously do. That doesn't make ur delusional theory true. Neither does the laughable NIST report(s). NIST? LOL! How did the towers collapse NIST? Uh gee, we'll take u as far as; "global collapse ensued". Yes it did didn't it? Global collapse of critical thinking & rationality. Enjoy the tyranny!
I'm not a physics expert, are you? If it as obvious as you put it, then you should write a paper for any scientific journal of your choosing, and prove your refutations of the claims by the National Institute of Standards of Technology, and why you stand against every scientific body who has investigated the matter, along with every structural engineer and every building collapse forensic scientist. It would be a landmark paper if you could prove it the way you say you can.
The more people and institutions and scientific bodies and studies promote ludicrous and impossible hypotheses the more possible and valid they become? No.
If you think "U don't need to be an egineer (sic)" then do us a favor and submit a paper to any scientific journal of your choosing as opposed to making know-it-all statements in youtube.
Is that the NIST report where they state that their WTC7 collapse hypothesis had a "very small likelihood of occuring"? So you're down with NIST, eh? NIST thinks a 767 "completely disappeared" into the n. tower in .23 secs. A 767-200 is 159 ft. long. 159 ft. in .23 secs. is about 524MPH, but they say it was flying through the air @ 433-466 MPH! So they think it accelerated once it met the tower. I made a typo in engineer. Sue me. & look out- there's a muslim boogeyman right behind you!
The part about the "muslim boogeyman" shouldn't merit a response, but it betrays the typical Western imperialist mentality behind your views. Remember that there is no US motive for them pulling an inside job but there is a motive for the other side - which we don't like to talk about. Like how US repression of independence in Arab states was found to directly lead to religious fundamentalism and extremism. Or how US attempt to turn Saudi Arabia into a US base led to OBL to switch sides.
Do you think Atta & crew planned to DESTROY both towers? Do you think this was their goal, the objective they had in mind? Seems like such an unexpected & impossible to predict chance occurence... and otherwise the attack kills a couple hundred, maybe, & starts a couple office fires. Not a world changing attack. So you think they thougt they'd destroy both towers? Motive? US turning the middle east into mil. bases? WELL WHAT's HAPPENED SINCE? ONLY MORE OF THAT! Sorry to yell but...
"Do you think Atta & crew..." - I don't know what they thought would happen. It is impossible to say without pure speculation. "Motive? US turning the middle east into mil. bases? WELL WHAT's HAPPENED SINCE? ONLY MORE OF THAT!" So, they attacked themselves to do more of what they got away with constantly before? In fact, to be honest, anyone familiar with the historical records knows that they got away with much worse before 9/11.
incubator babies & WMD anyone? They've "gotten away" w/all of this stuff based on fakery, coercing/outright tricking the populace ALL ALONG. Whether it's incubator babies in '90 or fake planes in '01. It's never "HEY people let's go WAR, plunder, & pillage in the middle east for no good reason". They always manufacture their reasons & u guys eat'em up as you lounge in your xenophobia & relish your inflated sense of ego & self-importance. I become the uneducated kook, & more bases go up. Repeat.
I certainly agree that in practically any society, no population willingly accepts groundless reasons for invading other countries. But it is a logical fallacy to assume that because the US government have manufactured certain stories like "incubator babies" in the Gulf War, that they also manufactured 9/11, and not only because it is a vastly incomparable example.
By the same token, I could say that they didn't manufacture the Boston Massacre, so naturally they didn't manufacture 9/11. But that makes no sense. Besides, if the US wanted to manufacture a disaster that would justify an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq, why would they concoct a story whose perpetrators were mostly from a crucial US ally state, Saudi Arabia?
We can come up with all those types of questions we want; Why did al-qaeda space the plane strikes so far apart? If you have enough time and freedom to still fly a second 767 into the WTC 15 minutes after the first then why not just wait and slam'em in together at the same time? Etc. But the real questions we should be asking most of us avoid because of an assumption the official conspiracy theory is proven and unquestionable fact. It's not.
The incubator babies is simply one in a long, long, long line of manufactured incidents and fraudulent news stories designed to sway popular opinion one way or the other. Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, the U.S.S. Liberty, incubator babies, Iraq's nuclear capability & WMD, just to name a few of the big ones. 9/11 was simply another in this line of manufactured provocation and justification for the continued imperialistic policies of the U.S. military.
There is no credible evidence that Pearl Harbor was a "manufactured incident". The U.S.S. Liberty was an Israeli attack on a US ship,and was in fact a public relations disaster and,if anything,could have swayed popular opinion in the wrong direction --your inclusion of this shows a fairly poor understanding of history. The other examples you give, which do have credibility,are thoroughly incomparable to 9/11. In those cases,an event which didn't exist was constructed in order to justify attacks.
So comparing it to 9/11 is entirely incongruous. Furthermore, I repeat, it is a logical fallacy to assume that because someone is responsible for one incident, that it is responsible for others. That removes the important burden of proof, which you seem to be ignoring.
The comment about understanding history was related to the example of the USS Liberty - for reasons, that I spelled out clearly. Furthermore, if Pearl Harbor was a manufactured incident, please direct me to either the journal of historical studies or the criminal investigation which would corroborate such a claim.
...but to not understand the motive the US government/military had or the great benefits they've reaped since is to really show that you've not thought this through at all, at all, and it's somewhat frustrating when I consider how you're chastising me to do my homework. Your CT is loony- it's ludicrous- it doesn't even begin to fit the data and it blames muslim boogiemen and that's why that is a valid attack on your dellusional thinking. Aren't you worried one's behind you right now? Seriously.
They have reaped some "great benefits" although the Iraq war has been an enormous liability for all concerned - which is natural, such endeavours are unpredictable. Furthermore, the US also reaped great benefits after the Boston Massacre. The British Invasions not only allowed the US to pursue their war of independence but also their extermination campaign against the Native population. 9/11 also provided impetus for Russia to strengthen their control over the Chechyans. This is nothing new
My guess is that, like every single uncontrolled event, there will always be thousands of unexplainable or unexpected occurances. But just because it has these occurances does not suddenly justify other possibilities for what occurred on 9/11. I would agree that there are unexplainable or odd events that occurred (as they always do in uncontrolled events - I urge you to read scientific journals), but that this leads us to fill the unexplainable with our own conclusions is absurd.
The burden is on you making the claim, not me. Perhaps you could provide the exact quotation and reference the part of the report where NIST makes the claim that the "plane ACCELERATED once it met and began flying into and through A BUILDING". If you can't provide evidence to back up your claims, then your claim is quite simply worthless.
I think that's the North Tower calculation. 433 or 466 mph through air... completely disappears into the tower in 0.25 seconds equaling 524 mph and acceleration AFTER meeting the bldg.
The link you provided didn't work, but I think I found the section you are discussing -- namely, Chapter Six of the text. I think that you are misreading or are confused because nowhere does the text say that a plane accelerated "AFTER meeting the bldg". Given the numbers you are providing, I think I can safely conclude that you have confused the impact speed of UA 11 (443) and UA 175 (542). Otherwise, none of the numbers you provide produce any matches within the text.
UA 11 443 "completely disappeared into the North Tower in 0.2 seconds", that means it ACCELERATED from 443 to roughly 524 mph after contacting the building.
Again, you are misreading and confusing the two figures. Not only could I not find the direct quotation you are providing, but also contradictory material. Instead, UA 11's impact speed was 443 mph and "fully penetrated the tower at approximately 0.25 s" (76). Flight 175, on the other hand, had an impact speed of 542 and full penetration into the tower "was completed at 0.2 s after impact" (93). None of this shows that either plane accelerated after contacting the building.
In fact, the report notes how UA 11 "was severely broken into debris as a result of impact with the tower". Some of the engines that survived, "had a speed of less than 50 mph" (78). So, the text itself undermines the claims you are making about it.
right ok iamaphoney i see where this going you are suggesting an extricably strong link between the beatles and the occult so if you have all this evidence at your disposal why not come clean out in the public EYE for all to see then make up our minds for our selves at the moment you are just as bad as the beatles stop giving us subliminal messages and come out with your ideas properly so that if indeed this is true it truly would be the biggest scandal of the 20th and 21st century bar JFK!!!!!!
Well, the JFK conspiracy has been totally debunked. In fact, it has now been shown by internal documents that the JFK conspiracy was virtually promoted within the government as a way to distract the population from much more important structural and institutional issues - the same way the 9/11 CT does. Both conspiracies are huge gifts to those in power because the sole consequence of each is to keep the power system running.
Wait, so if the government promoted the JFK conspiracy in order to distract from other issues that would be a conspiracy in itself. But you also say that conspiracies don't happen, how can both be true?
I don't recall saying that conspiracies don't happen. If you could find a quotation of that, it would be appreciated. Rather, most conspiracy theories (a distinction) have little merit as they are incapable of meeting a standard of proof required in other fields. The JFK thing that I mentioned was not a conspiracy theory, nor was there an attempt to cover anything up. Rather, the information that I relayed was found in a 1998 Department of Defense report. Nothing like a CT.
Well a recording was released last year of CIA agent E. Howard Hunt by his son, that Hunt allowed his son to release only after he died, describing his involvement in the JFK assassination conspiracy & naming others involved including LBJ. Maybe you didn't know that but I'd say that meets the standard of proof for anyone actually interested in justice.
Then you don't understand the meaning of the term. I suggest you review the "confession". Hunt uses phrases like "I think" and "I heard from", but provides no direct evidence other than what he claims to have overheard (backed-up by nothing) and what he assumes occurred. Furthermore, he subscribes to the grassy knoll theory, which scientific analysis has virtually debunked as a scientific impossibility. Hunt's confession (not the first one) is essentially worthless and is not evidence.
He confesses to having been a 'benchwarmer' for 'the operation'. Black operations are commonly compartmentalized. I believe he spent his whole life denying anything to do with JFK's murder & then all of a sudden changes his tune on his death bed & admits to being in on it, & you expect me to believe that he just did that for the hell of it & was wrong as if that's any sort of a logical conclusion.
Again, re-read the alleged "confession". By benchwarmer, he means that he was not involved because he "had a reputation for honesty". He claims then that because he was so honest, he was kept in the background and not given any real details. Which is why the deathbed confession is filled only with "I heard froms" and "I would suggest" - nothing conclusive. Nor is there any documentary evidence to back up the claims that he is making.
And just so we're clear with the sports analogy, a "benchwarmer" is someone who doesn't get to play in the game. So to say that he uses this term to speak of his involvement is really absurd.
Actually, the satanism or "occultism" of the Beastles and their handlers/the system is easier to prove than what we all want to know - what exactly happened to Paul and the hows, whos and whys of his demise.
I never noted that before - if you take the second "T" (the cross) out of theBea(t)les and use chaldean hewbrew kabala (numerology) - you get "theBea les" which adds up to 33/6 Number of the Master Teacher/ The Christ- who was crucified in his 33rd year. At 15 seconds we`re shown "thebea" which adds up to 22/4, number of the Master teacher. To a numerologist this is no coincidence. The words "TheBeaTles" were carefully chosen and have much occult significance.
Mistake - 22/4 is the number of the Master Builder. 33/6 - Master Teacher. 11/2 - The Messenger As in 9/11, Twin Towers were a giant 11, hit by Flight 11, in the 11th State of the Union (NY). Twin Towers also had 110 stories each (two more 11`s). Occult magicians always use the same number as many times as possible during a ritual to bring about success. Another example 7/7 - London bombings are actually 777 because 2005 was a 7 year. 7 day, 7th month in a 7 year. Olmypics begins - 8/8/08.
I was wondering if the airplane exploding 0.31 might be the Pan Am at Lockerbie. 270 people were killed - 259 on board and 11 from Lockerbie itself. 747 was just entering Scottish airspace when the explosion occurred. Was blamed on Libyan terrorists but there were rumours of locals seeing a missile strike the jumbo before it blew up. 189 US citizens died that day over Scotland making it the worst terrorist attrocicity against the US before September 11th.
I finally found the source of the "missle" footage. Your just seeing the plane scene overlayed over the Stargate Atlantis opening credits (I now see IAAP uses alot of Stargate Atlantis imagery - watch?v=gp6H0xtzzw0 ).
If it's backwards, that means that iamaphoney took the briefcase from that place, dumped it's content into the car, drove backwards to the ocean, then disappeared. ;)
Maybe this is obvious but the last 20 seconds reminds me of the scene in 2001 where the monkey throws the bone up in the air, and then we see the obelisk.
I've always been a skeptic about all this, but I really like what he's done with the music - sometimes tunes sound better backwards!
Ok, these short ones are retarded....
KristalynJ 1 year ago
my brain hurts
cheyennebritbrat 1 year ago
how many of ya are there... just a lot of look a likes. or not...
GnikNusEht 1 year ago
hey man, I dig what your doin here and all but taking advantage of peoples stupidity is just plain and simply wrong. still though I love the whole mysticism about it all and it's a good watch. It's like watching a cool movie. But in REALITY it's just pretend. Theres really people who would tell you Paul is dead even they had a gun to their head. Well, keep making vids but try not to profit too much on the absence of common sense in the general population of todays society:-) Cheers
bones22j 2 years ago
I have a suitcase too. I'm so special.
JessicaRabbit1975 2 years ago
i don't understand nothing
querant 2 years ago 2
The road to somewhere, Santa Susana Pass.
It leads to Spahn Ranch, a suitcase in the grass.
0hNoNotHimAgain 3 years ago 9
@0hNoNotHimAgain You should go get it, might be Waldo's suitcase.
KENNETHCONNEL 9 months ago
DULL
lostinbass4 3 years ago
So there's more than one suitcase?
Tdani81 3 years ago 5
He walked into the large dining room and saw a wall of people's backs in front of him. Tip toeing to look over their shoulders, Vernon could see Ian sitting at an upright piano, plunging the keys as he led the crowd in a raucous chorus of what's the use of WORRYING, it NEVER was worthwhile, HEY!....
GE0FFBAKER 3 years ago
Keep taking your meds mate.
ChuckBleedinNorris 3 years ago
Mebbe this is some far right religious propaganda to convince us of the EVIL of the Beatles.
some of those evangelistic god bothering southern churches have huge budgets,
and have alos been known to dabble on YouTube with what seems like Expensive Video Audio Editing kit.
whatever this is....it is certainly MINDFUCK!
Enjoy as ART yes not too much harm in that,
but approach with a sense of humour/caution.
I Only hope thats what the author intends..
Absolute madness if he doesn't.
Hexachloraphine 3 years ago
WTF IS THIS?
TJD246 3 years ago
Billie Eugene?
to761983 3 years ago
boring
sonidolisiado 3 years ago
William "Junior" Campbell, ex-of The Marmalade.
to761983 3 years ago
This can NOT be the penultimate end of IAAP's expose... but every day that ends without a follow-up places only more expectation on the impending new addition... which surely must come...
RTEHeydrich 3 years ago
...?
GraxMasterPlan 3 years ago
As I sat here munching on a plain salad, I suddenly exclaimed "Santa Susana! Pass me the Spahn Ranch dressing!"
But seriously...could you guys please take your 9/11 conversation to a more appropriate video? This is supposed to be about 11/9.
0hNoNotHimAgain 3 years ago 2
...and....who can explain me the meaning of the old video called "iamaphoney CD" or something like this (I don't remember really the exact title of that video).
I'm so sorry for my english 'cause I'm italian.
P.S.: The fab four, you know, it's possible that themselves were kidding about this question and about many others things which made the history like (as you shown us) fake moustaches?
GraxMasterPlan 3 years ago
Iamaphoney, from the rotten apple number 50 that you posted, this "ununderstanding" videos like this...: what does it mean a man who is swimming completely weared and is walking backwords with a bag? And what about the pale which the man (that I think are you) hails? Is this the place where Paul was buried? Where can someone find other clues? Since when you begin to speak about Paul's legam with crowley and satanism (even if crowly is a magician and not a satanist) I begin to understand nothing
GraxMasterPlan 3 years ago
Hmmm.
Its been almost 2 months and still no new Rotten Apple vid.. :P
DavidTylen 3 years ago
iDea?
paymrcleancut 3 years ago
this one again..
dhyanabhumigata 3 years ago
Thebes.
to761983 3 years ago
my god.. is iamaphoney julian lennon?
saygnight1990 3 years ago
where did you get that idea from...
RTEHeydrich 3 years ago
the brief clips of papers have stuff to do with lennons writing in some way.. ive rea about people accusing this guy to be lennon reincarnated on a mission to reveal pauls accident but that sounds too farfetched
saygnight1990 3 years ago
The Fireman's candle never goes out.
to761983 3 years ago
The Fireman is no mason.
to761983 3 years ago
28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28
to761983 3 years ago
revisionisthistory(dot)org/kingkill33(dot)html
"The number 28 is one of the correspondences of Solomon in kabbalistic numerology; the Solomonic name assigned to 28 is "Beale."
28IF.
to761983 3 years ago
Except the number "28" is just an arbitrarily chosen number, so this doesn't really have any significance.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
WTF????
R0LLlNGSTONES 3 years ago
you need a five star criminal to break the code, just ask magneto and titanium man.L.I.L.Y. is molech.
howdoyousleepyoucunt 3 years ago
Molech eh? Like on the dollar bill and at the Boho Grove.
Somebody on NIR cracked the LILY thing or at least came up with a very plausible explanation - I haven't been there for a while, though, can't remember details.
to761983 3 years ago
The level of scholarship at NIR is at its very best, appalling. That's about the nicest thing you could say about the work that is done there. The bulk of the focus is based on weak photographic examples, which undermine their very premise by their own weakness. I'd be happy to provide numerous details if asked.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
There are some VERY quick subliminals at the start - I accidentally caught one when changing pages. I came back and found two, one is a b/w photo of a man with glasses and a moustache at 0:04.
Who?
to761983 3 years ago
Maybe he is Mal Evans (beatles roadie) or Gerard DePardiue at Asterix movie...dunno
pulpmiction 3 years ago
Mal Evans was my only guess.
to761983 3 years ago
what happened to Oskar Rakos? Did he disappear?
Who will get the suitcase?
I was out there last time, but got too scared.
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
Fuckin Sad, this is nothing but a damn ARG, wake up people, whether Paul is Dead or not has nothing to do whatsoever with IAAP, or his fake briefcases, how long has this bozo been running you all in circles now? Sad.
DecayedDoSpit 3 years ago
well i hope someone finds the empty case anyway.
tikvision 3 years ago
I'm a follower of your vids, but I'm sorry. This one was absolutely pointless. On the good side, you are improving your editing and shooting skills. Nice car plate :)
tikvision 3 years ago
Thebes. Beale.
2:04 - Bonzo Dog Band.
Vivian Stanshall is back in play!
to761983 3 years ago
the secret is about john and paul and something they did. we were tight man real tight.
howdoyousleepyoucunt 3 years ago
23IF
D0CT0RPEPPER 3 years ago
These are the symbols you can find at the end of the title of some of Iamaphoney's videos:
T , o or 0 ,Q ,A,a,u,n,r,p,A,U,L,9,2,2,0,0,8,5,O,C,L,K,i,n,d,a,n,g,r
It's sorted from his latest to earliest videos. You can read: indangr , sounds like in Danger, is Macca in danger? Also you can see a lot of numbers. Who can see more in these letters? Please respond!
DavidTylen 3 years ago
PAUL IS ALIVE!!!!
pol1407a 3 years ago
akerue
yenohpamal 3 years ago
Good question. Nobody knows. IAAP has revealed nothing about the suitcase and he also has revealed nothing about the so-called "code" that he cracked in the Beatles "Love" album.
I'm beginning to think there is noting to the suitcase and there is no code in the "Love" album.
faithinchaos2012 3 years ago
there was a first suitcase. it contained a copy of the book of the law and an LP of the magic christian, with a few scribbles here and there, and a clue IAAP said was "missed"
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
I thought it was supposed to contain some revealtions from Mal Evans book that never was released?
Why is IAAP even giving clues? Why doesn't he just tells us what he knows?
faithinchaos2012 3 years ago
maybe because he doesn't know anything :)
but i'd like to hear he's a phoney, too :D
fatalcze 3 years ago
I beginning to think that also. I think he's just riding the PID rumour and suggesting that he has new evidence or some shockig revaltion when he really doesn't.
Instead, he'll just hint at certain things and make obscure videos to keep everyone interested and continue to promise something big when nothing comes.
Nothing is real.
faithinchaos2012 3 years ago 4
I think this, but I also think the other at the same time. that keeps me nice and confused and learned. :D
2012 tho has even less evidence of any major earth-shattering event. It's simply the Mayan calendar rolling over to the next B'ak'tun cycle.
BUT WHO WAS PHONE?
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
Dude, you seriously have too much time on your hands if you have the time to make and post over a hundred Rotten Apple videos. Paul isn't dead and everyone knows it. That whole "Paul is dead" thing was a myth. You know it, I know it, and the world knows it. Move on with your life dude... Seriously. -_-
BlahBlahBlah143 3 years ago
If you can't trust a heavy metal meth head high-school dropout who still lives with his mommy and who uses "dude" for every tenth word that comes out of his mouth -- because "dude" represents ten percent of his vocabulary -- whom can you trust in these troubled times?
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
Perfect - attack the messenger and not the message. Nothing proves more how staggeringly poor the PID argument is than such tactics.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
So what? Messengers suck!
What's the message that you would have preferred for me to attack in lieu of the messenger anyway? "Dude"? What am I supposed to say in response to "dude"?
Or is the message "Paul isn't dead and everyone knows it"? Man, how do you respond to THAT incisive reasoning?
You don't doubt that I've given an accurate demographic picture of the messenger, do you?
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
Cranberry sauce
blazak 3 years ago
I AM HE - (Reb muneh tpu kool)
ALElSTERCROWLEY 3 years ago
I AM HE - (Look up the number)
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
Paul is dead, John is alive.
jondavis1234 3 years ago
What about George and Ringo?
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
George is locked up in my basement. He gives me decent blowjobs every now and then. And Ringo is acting naturally.
jondavis1234 3 years ago
But what's natural for Richie isn't natural for most people, now is it?
PiIgrimsProgress 3 years ago
Bingo.
PiIgrimsProgress 3 years ago
"I ordered the 10 hour dvd for $39."
"U2 is a great band"
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
watch?v=YZwW406SC8Q
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
He said that Mike from Holland know about this.
About John Lennon being alive.
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
I think he meant the video guy, I think thats Ian Martin.
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
He sounded very serious.
He told me that he had a photo of Paul Mccartney and Iamaphoney taken at a gas-station in California.
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
*****He told me that he had a photo of Paul Mccartney and Iamaphoney taken at a gas-station in California.*****
How can that be when he says below that "Paul McCartney is Iamaphoney"?
And also, I'm just a teeny bit skeptical of the seriousness of his claim to have met a living John Lennon.
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
oskar rakos told me he met Lennon.
I not know what happened to him.
I havent heard from him since he left to meet mr. phoney!
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
Do you think that it's possible that Mr. Rakos was simply pulling our legs?
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
I will help picking it up this time did somebody go?
PaulMcCartneyIsDead 3 years ago
Pete Sellers is Dead.
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
john L E N N O N is alive do you understand that????????
Paul McCartney is Iamaphoney!!!!!!
Is is all a conspiracy....
lennon is alive
oskarrakos 3 years ago
Understand what? You realize there is no evidence to back up anything that you are claiming, right?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
.paul had those big glasses on.and they just walked right .also there was some people in the limo.thats weird i would have sweared it was a old lennon.i know it cant be but still i looked into his eyes.
oskarrakos 3 years ago
Anybody understood anything from this and could explain me?
(I guess no, you're just watching him and say he's a genius without knowing what he's talking about.)
itaigalgal 3 years ago
I understand these videos less and less each time a new one comes out.
Veggieman87 3 years ago
It started long ago in the Garden of Eden, when Adam said to Eve, "You're for me."
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
yesterday, LOVE was such an easy game to play
nothing you can say but you can learn to play the game
LOVE is strange many many people take it for a game
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
Well you are a gorgeous boy , whatever you are doing
Babydolly666 3 years ago
The guy in the video looks like Zak Starkey, Ringo's son, who drums in Oasis.
BurtBenz 3 years ago
but it's here; "Lifelong Passion": 1XWm9xWmDSY
awilk2001 3 years ago
My compliments on such a wonderfully done video, IAAP!
awilk2001 3 years ago
"Lifelong Passion" video: XC9iDJjLthc
awilk2001 3 years ago
never mind its not there :(
awilk2001 3 years ago
Go to MikeyNL1038 YT Channel to HEAR the REVERSE lyrics of this video.
awilk2001 3 years ago
rather the FORWARD of this song
awilk2001 3 years ago
"I be 66"
Mind you, this was released on his birthday.
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
T PEPP
I BEBB
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
for all I know - I 6e 66 - is a part of the peppercode it also sure looks like he put mal evans personal papers in the briefcase I will go this weekend anyone care to come?
oskarrakos 3 years ago
( I BE BB ) is part of the Pepper Code.
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
"a more creepy reclusive looking person."
Yea, they should have got me to do it.
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
I can't say it's a larger or smaller matter, compared to the JFK conspiracy. I see these things as being parts of the same blanket; where the only thing larger than any one of them, is the blanket itself.
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
yes, thank you!
awilk2001 3 years ago
It makes sense that the conspiracy theories should start to tie into one another. The very premise of conspiracy theories is that there are no facts that back up the claims because the facts are being covered up by the conspiracy. Given that CT's all rely on this same convenient premise, it is no surprise that they become connected in some way.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
My favorite CT is the one about Bin Laden and boys attacking America.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
While Mossad agents working for a phoney moving company filmed & celebrated & police officers at the scene told people to move back because the building (#7) was about to 'blow up'.
DaveIrie 3 years ago 2
watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
This is not a CT. In fact, an extensive and independent criminal investigation proved it and uncovered precisely where the money came from. There has never been any independent criminal investigation that has found any other plausible source for the crime.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
The 9/11 Commission Report? How fast did the south tower collapse? The Report says 10 seconds. What happened to WTC 7? It doesn't even mention WTC 7. Extensive? What about the put-options? The Report claims the put-options are not important because the trail doesn't lead back to their prime suspects. LOL! An extensive & independent criminal investigation does not set out w/a theory in place, suspects in mind, and it doesn't go about fitting the data to the theory... no sir. watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
First, the investigation uncovered that the suspects were not those whom were initially considered to be responsible. Rather, it was discovered that the actual plotting took place in Germany and that most financing came through the United Arab Emirates. This was contrary to the official line undertaken by the government in their quest to invade Afghanistan. So your point about seeting out with a theory in place is groundless.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
As for your points regarding the collapses, keep in mind that I am not a structural engineer nor do I have any experience in building collapse forensics. All I can say is that no one who does have such experience have produced any credible argument that confirms the CT argument. If you could find one that does, I'd be happy to examine it. Certainly, one cannot gain such experience by spending a few hours on the internet.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
U cited the official report- it claims the s. tower collapsed in 10 secs., even people who argue hardest for the official CT (bin laden & boys) know that this is a laughable number & cite 15-18 secs instead. Your "extensive" report flubbed that & doesn't even mention the 47 story WTC7. So, I mean c'mon. Really. Bldgs. don't turn to powder bcause the tops catch on fire. U don't need to be an egineer to know that. But it looks like ur already pretty attached to ur fav CT so I digress.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
If you're still talking about the 9/11 Commission, that is certainly not the official report on the scientific facts of the event, which can be found in the extensively documented NIST report, which is a crucial read and includes a lot of information about WTC 7. It renders absurd any notion that there was any conspiracy behind the text, and I highly suggest reading it.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
And, yes, you do need to have a solid understanding of the subject you are discussing and not just believe random comments on the internet before coming to your conclusions. The fact that you don't think so, and simultaneously disagree with the opinion of every scientific body, structural engineer, and forensic scientist in building collapse (an actual field) on the matter, speaks volumes.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I would suggest u do some actual research- & not cling to & defend the paranoid CT about muslim boogeimen as if it's gospel, assuming everything else to be misinformed or underinformed rubbish as u obviously do. That doesn't make ur delusional theory true. Neither does the laughable NIST report(s). NIST? LOL! How did the towers collapse NIST? Uh gee, we'll take u as far as; "global collapse ensued". Yes it did didn't it? Global collapse of critical thinking & rationality. Enjoy the tyranny!
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
I'm not a physics expert, are you? If it as obvious as you put it, then you should write a paper for any scientific journal of your choosing, and prove your refutations of the claims by the National Institute of Standards of Technology, and why you stand against every scientific body who has investigated the matter, along with every structural engineer and every building collapse forensic scientist. It would be a landmark paper if you could prove it the way you say you can.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
The more people and institutions and scientific bodies and studies promote ludicrous and impossible hypotheses the more possible and valid they become? No.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
If you think "U don't need to be an egineer (sic)" then do us a favor and submit a paper to any scientific journal of your choosing as opposed to making know-it-all statements in youtube.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Is that the NIST report where they state that their WTC7 collapse hypothesis had a "very small likelihood of occuring"? So you're down with NIST, eh? NIST thinks a 767 "completely disappeared" into the n. tower in .23 secs. A 767-200 is 159 ft. long. 159 ft. in .23 secs. is about 524MPH, but they say it was flying through the air @ 433-466 MPH! So they think it accelerated once it met the tower. I made a typo in engineer. Sue me. & look out- there's a muslim boogeyman right behind you!
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
The part about the "muslim boogeyman" shouldn't merit a response, but it betrays the typical Western imperialist mentality behind your views. Remember that there is no US motive for them pulling an inside job but there is a motive for the other side - which we don't like to talk about. Like how US repression of independence in Arab states was found to directly lead to religious fundamentalism and extremism. Or how US attempt to turn Saudi Arabia into a US base led to OBL to switch sides.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Do you think Atta & crew planned to DESTROY both towers? Do you think this was their goal, the objective they had in mind? Seems like such an unexpected & impossible to predict chance occurence... and otherwise the attack kills a couple hundred, maybe, & starts a couple office fires. Not a world changing attack. So you think they thougt they'd destroy both towers? Motive? US turning the middle east into mil. bases? WELL WHAT's HAPPENED SINCE? ONLY MORE OF THAT! Sorry to yell but...
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
"Do you think Atta & crew..." - I don't know what they thought would happen. It is impossible to say without pure speculation. "Motive? US turning the middle east into mil. bases? WELL WHAT's HAPPENED SINCE? ONLY MORE OF THAT!" So, they attacked themselves to do more of what they got away with constantly before? In fact, to be honest, anyone familiar with the historical records knows that they got away with much worse before 9/11.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
incubator babies & WMD anyone? They've "gotten away" w/all of this stuff based on fakery, coercing/outright tricking the populace ALL ALONG. Whether it's incubator babies in '90 or fake planes in '01. It's never "HEY people let's go WAR, plunder, & pillage in the middle east for no good reason". They always manufacture their reasons & u guys eat'em up as you lounge in your xenophobia & relish your inflated sense of ego & self-importance. I become the uneducated kook, & more bases go up. Repeat.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
I certainly agree that in practically any society, no population willingly accepts groundless reasons for invading other countries. But it is a logical fallacy to assume that because the US government have manufactured certain stories like "incubator babies" in the Gulf War, that they also manufactured 9/11, and not only because it is a vastly incomparable example.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
By the same token, I could say that they didn't manufacture the Boston Massacre, so naturally they didn't manufacture 9/11. But that makes no sense. Besides, if the US wanted to manufacture a disaster that would justify an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq, why would they concoct a story whose perpetrators were mostly from a crucial US ally state, Saudi Arabia?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
We can come up with all those types of questions we want; Why did al-qaeda space the plane strikes so far apart? If you have enough time and freedom to still fly a second 767 into the WTC 15 minutes after the first then why not just wait and slam'em in together at the same time? Etc. But the real questions we should be asking most of us avoid because of an assumption the official conspiracy theory is proven and unquestionable fact. It's not.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
The incubator babies is simply one in a long, long, long line of manufactured incidents and fraudulent news stories designed to sway popular opinion one way or the other. Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, the U.S.S. Liberty, incubator babies, Iraq's nuclear capability & WMD, just to name a few of the big ones. 9/11 was simply another in this line of manufactured provocation and justification for the continued imperialistic policies of the U.S. military.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
There is no credible evidence that Pearl Harbor was a "manufactured incident". The U.S.S. Liberty was an Israeli attack on a US ship,and was in fact a public relations disaster and,if anything,could have swayed popular opinion in the wrong direction --your inclusion of this shows a fairly poor understanding of history. The other examples you give, which do have credibility,are thoroughly incomparable to 9/11. In those cases,an event which didn't exist was constructed in order to justify attacks.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
So comparing it to 9/11 is entirely incongruous. Furthermore, I repeat, it is a logical fallacy to assume that because someone is responsible for one incident, that it is responsible for others. That removes the important burden of proof, which you seem to be ignoring.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
"There is no credible evidence that Pearl Harbor was a "manufactured incident"."
Compare with:
"your inclusion of this shows a fairly poor understanding of history."
He's an arrogant and patronising prick isn't he? But those two quotes together show his FAIL.
to761983 3 years ago
The comment about understanding history was related to the example of the USS Liberty - for reasons, that I spelled out clearly. Furthermore, if Pearl Harbor was a manufactured incident, please direct me to either the journal of historical studies or the criminal investigation which would corroborate such a claim.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
...but to not understand the motive the US government/military had or the great benefits they've reaped since is to really show that you've not thought this through at all, at all, and it's somewhat frustrating when I consider how you're chastising me to do my homework. Your CT is loony- it's ludicrous- it doesn't even begin to fit the data and it blames muslim boogiemen and that's why that is a valid attack on your dellusional thinking. Aren't you worried one's behind you right now? Seriously.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
They have reaped some "great benefits" although the Iraq war has been an enormous liability for all concerned - which is natural, such endeavours are unpredictable. Furthermore, the US also reaped great benefits after the Boston Massacre. The British Invasions not only allowed the US to pursue their war of independence but also their extermination campaign against the Native population. 9/11 also provided impetus for Russia to strengthen their control over the Chechyans. This is nothing new
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
My guess is that, like every single uncontrolled event, there will always be thousands of unexplainable or unexpected occurances. But just because it has these occurances does not suddenly justify other possibilities for what occurred on 9/11. I would agree that there are unexplainable or odd events that occurred (as they always do in uncontrolled events - I urge you to read scientific journals), but that this leads us to fill the unexplainable with our own conclusions is absurd.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
NIST thinks a plane ACCELERATED once it met and began flying into and through A BUILDING!
433-466mph through the air...
BOOM; meets the tower and actually accelerates to 524mph.
I urge YOU to read the scientific journals and the official reports!
Filling the unexplained and the odd and the fishy with THE TV and the PERP'S conclusions and fairy tales is very absurd.
Please.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
The burden is on you making the claim, not me. Perhaps you could provide the exact quotation and reference the part of the report where NIST makes the claim that the "plane ACCELERATED once it met and began flying into and through A BUILDING". If you can't provide evidence to back up your claims, then your claim is quite simply worthless.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
wtcDOTnistDOTgovSLASHpubsSLASHNISTNCSTAR1DraftDOTpdf
page 38
I think that's the North Tower calculation. 433 or 466 mph through air... completely disappears into the tower in 0.25 seconds equaling 524 mph and acceleration AFTER meeting the bldg.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
The link you provided didn't work, but I think I found the section you are discussing -- namely, Chapter Six of the text. I think that you are misreading or are confused because nowhere does the text say that a plane accelerated "AFTER meeting the bldg". Given the numbers you are providing, I think I can safely conclude that you have confused the impact speed of UA 11 (443) and UA 175 (542). Otherwise, none of the numbers you provide produce any matches within the text.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
UA 11 443 "completely disappeared into the North Tower in 0.2 seconds", that means it ACCELERATED from 443 to roughly 524 mph after contacting the building.
NormanSweetcream 3 years ago
Again, you are misreading and confusing the two figures. Not only could I not find the direct quotation you are providing, but also contradictory material. Instead, UA 11's impact speed was 443 mph and "fully penetrated the tower at approximately 0.25 s" (76). Flight 175, on the other hand, had an impact speed of 542 and full penetration into the tower "was completed at 0.2 s after impact" (93). None of this shows that either plane accelerated after contacting the building.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
In fact, the report notes how UA 11 "was severely broken into debris as a result of impact with the tower". Some of the engines that survived, "had a speed of less than 50 mph" (78). So, the text itself undermines the claims you are making about it.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
obviously they were all three controlled demolitions...total inside job
thebystander 3 years ago 2
hmmmmmmm....
yhshvh10 3 years ago
Nice, lifelong passion sounds very good reversed :)
addsfsds 3 years ago
Santa Sussana Pass again. Look slike it may be in the same location the 1sT case waqs left. Hope there is better suff inside this one.
socarfiat 3 years ago
i dont get it
itshammer 3 years ago
right ok iamaphoney i see where this going you are suggesting an extricably strong link between the beatles and the occult so if you have all this evidence at your disposal why not come clean out in the public EYE for all to see then make up our minds for our selves at the moment you are just as bad as the beatles stop giving us subliminal messages and come out with your ideas properly so that if indeed this is true it truly would be the biggest scandal of the 20th and 21st century bar JFK!!!!!!
M374EVL 3 years ago
No - MUCH bigger than JFK !!!
LODGE4444 3 years ago 2
LODGE4444, I have thought that for a while now-
MUCH BIGGER! One reason this has been so disturbing for me.
awilk2001 3 years ago
Well, the JFK conspiracy has been totally debunked. In fact, it has now been shown by internal documents that the JFK conspiracy was virtually promoted within the government as a way to distract the population from much more important structural and institutional issues - the same way the 9/11 CT does. Both conspiracies are huge gifts to those in power because the sole consequence of each is to keep the power system running.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Wait, so if the government promoted the JFK conspiracy in order to distract from other issues that would be a conspiracy in itself. But you also say that conspiracies don't happen, how can both be true?
DaveIrie 3 years ago 2
I don't recall saying that conspiracies don't happen. If you could find a quotation of that, it would be appreciated. Rather, most conspiracy theories (a distinction) have little merit as they are incapable of meeting a standard of proof required in other fields. The JFK thing that I mentioned was not a conspiracy theory, nor was there an attempt to cover anything up. Rather, the information that I relayed was found in a 1998 Department of Defense report. Nothing like a CT.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Well a recording was released last year of CIA agent E. Howard Hunt by his son, that Hunt allowed his son to release only after he died, describing his involvement in the JFK assassination conspiracy & naming others involved including LBJ. Maybe you didn't know that but I'd say that meets the standard of proof for anyone actually interested in justice.
DaveIrie 3 years ago
Then you don't understand the meaning of the term. I suggest you review the "confession". Hunt uses phrases like "I think" and "I heard from", but provides no direct evidence other than what he claims to have overheard (backed-up by nothing) and what he assumes occurred. Furthermore, he subscribes to the grassy knoll theory, which scientific analysis has virtually debunked as a scientific impossibility. Hunt's confession (not the first one) is essentially worthless and is not evidence.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
He confesses to having been a 'benchwarmer' for 'the operation'. Black operations are commonly compartmentalized. I believe he spent his whole life denying anything to do with JFK's murder & then all of a sudden changes his tune on his death bed & admits to being in on it, & you expect me to believe that he just did that for the hell of it & was wrong as if that's any sort of a logical conclusion.
DaveIrie 3 years ago
Again, re-read the alleged "confession". By benchwarmer, he means that he was not involved because he "had a reputation for honesty". He claims then that because he was so honest, he was kept in the background and not given any real details. Which is why the deathbed confession is filled only with "I heard froms" and "I would suggest" - nothing conclusive. Nor is there any documentary evidence to back up the claims that he is making.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
And just so we're clear with the sports analogy, a "benchwarmer" is someone who doesn't get to play in the game. So to say that he uses this term to speak of his involvement is really absurd.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Actually, the satanism or "occultism" of the Beastles and their handlers/the system is easier to prove than what we all want to know - what exactly happened to Paul and the hows, whos and whys of his demise.
to761983 3 years ago
If it's so easy to prove, then how come there isn't any evidence that has been presented?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I never noted that before - if you take the second "T" (the cross) out of theBea(t)les and use chaldean hewbrew kabala (numerology) - you get "theBea les" which adds up to 33/6 Number of the Master Teacher/ The Christ- who was crucified in his 33rd year. At 15 seconds we`re shown "thebea" which adds up to 22/4, number of the Master teacher. To a numerologist this is no coincidence. The words "TheBeaTles" were carefully chosen and have much occult significance.
orbandsceptre27 3 years ago
Mistake - 22/4 is the number of the Master Builder. 33/6 - Master Teacher. 11/2 - The Messenger As in 9/11, Twin Towers were a giant 11, hit by Flight 11, in the 11th State of the Union (NY). Twin Towers also had 110 stories each (two more 11`s). Occult magicians always use the same number as many times as possible during a ritual to bring about success. Another example 7/7 - London bombings are actually 777 because 2005 was a 7 year. 7 day, 7th month in a 7 year. Olmypics begins - 8/8/08.
orbandsceptre27 3 years ago
So glad you pointed that out !!
awilk2001 3 years ago
I was wondering if the airplane exploding 0.31 might be the Pan Am at Lockerbie. 270 people were killed - 259 on board and 11 from Lockerbie itself. 747 was just entering Scottish airspace when the explosion occurred. Was blamed on Libyan terrorists but there were rumours of locals seeing a missile strike the jumbo before it blew up. 189 US citizens died that day over Scotland making it the worst terrorist attrocicity against the US before September 11th.
orbandsceptre27 3 years ago
I can believe that about a missile. It wouldn't be the first time that has happened and it's hidden from us.
awilk2001 3 years ago
I finally found the source of the "missle" footage. Your just seeing the plane scene overlayed over the Stargate Atlantis opening credits (I now see IAAP uses alot of Stargate Atlantis imagery - watch?v=gp6H0xtzzw0 ).
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
hey-iaap-r u ganna start makin sum thebea T LES
shirts? i want 1!where'd u get that "cross" character,my pc doesn't have 1 iaap's still got the best tunes!
sanguine111 3 years ago
Gee.
If it's backwards, that means that iamaphoney took the briefcase from that place, dumped it's content into the car, drove backwards to the ocean, then disappeared. ;)
C'mon, iamaphoney. You know that's funny!
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
It's weird how the dude in this video looks like he could a male model or something, you might expect to be a more creepy reclusive looking person.
DaveIrie 3 years ago
Maybe this is obvious but the last 20 seconds reminds me of the scene in 2001 where the monkey throws the bone up in the air, and then we see the obelisk.
I've always been a skeptic about all this, but I really like what he's done with the music - sometimes tunes sound better backwards!
bluefinger43 3 years ago
i meant "there"
ariarmy 3 years ago
can someone reverse this video?
mike - im not sure there is another briefcase their...
ariarmy 3 years ago
skinny dude has a another suitcase!!
go and get it mike!!!
:-P