Obama cancels space program in order to make america more unhealthy, how? by making medical services FREE, why? because in most americans minds then thinks, i can do shit eat shit, f*ck shit, whatever happens, obama will take care of my ass.
not a good thing, medical assistance and healthcare is supposed to be each and everyone's responsibility, not the government's.
NEW AND IMPROVED I LIKE THIS CORVETTE MODEL OVER THE FAMILY SEDAN SPACE SHUTTLE WE ARE LOOKING ATH THE FUTURE NOW . gO NASA GO AIR FORCE . TEAM USA CAN LEAD TOO .THE SHUTTLE RETIREMENT WAS A JOKE SOMETHING BETTER COMMETHS
@shfbdfi1273 An astronaut is actually someone who explores or enters out space, so there will always be astronauts, even if those astronauts are pilots or even school teachers.
Fuck the robot space plane, how about that release mechanism. Smooth as baby shit. Just think of the engineering that went into the latches and the parachute to pull the pins on them.
@fertilizerspike A lot went into the design, redesign, modifications to the redesign, but all that was just so the vehicle could test with a proper release. and if you could see the setup up close you would realize its not as fancy as you think. Believe me I know. I was involved in the original testing at Holloman resulting in the FIRST test Aug 11, 1998.
@dean000000001 That was the X-37, the full size version of the X-40 test vehicle. The X-40 in this video is now in the Air & Space Museum in Dayton OH
I would guess there's a high powered camera inside to possibly replace predator drones since it can stay up in space indefinitely and doesn't violate any no fly zones, and lastly it'll be closer to any spy satellites. Probably used to spy on China and Russia.
Thank you for the answers guys. Now, what kind of mission takes 7 months and an ummanned spaceship to complete? Should I guess it was just orbiting earth all this time? Where the hell did it go? And if it is scaled is there an original size prototype constructed yet?
I know it's unmanned... but the way it lands without the expected flare it looks like a really hard landing.... until you see the drop at 3:30 and you see that the landing is PERFECT!!!
@NeutralNegotiator No, (apparently). I just seen on my homepage news and X-37B (unmanned) just returned to Earth after a 7 month operational flight. The Air Force claimed the mission was to test the spacecraft, wouldn't say about the contents of the payload. Apparently this thing is very secret, I just found out about it 10 minutes ago.
Even though it's stubby, at the rate of glide it becomes a lifiting body and can use a proportionally smaller wing to fly. Remember, a bulblebee flies even though it's wings are too small to provide adequate lift for it's body size.
As the first Air Force NCO to work on the original X-40 testing I can reply to all the stupid comments. All aerodynamic testing was completed prior to any assembly by Boeing. Numerous ground testing was accomplished at Holloman AFB. Many tow and releases tests were done to test the ground characteristics to include track to center-line. Several redesigns of the carry equip were done to get it right. The original test was August 11, 1998 at 0659 at Holloman AFB NM. THEN it went to Edwards.
As the first Air Force NCO to work on the original X-40 testing I can reply to all the stupid comments. All aerodynamic testing was completed prior to any assembly by Boeing. Numerous ground testing was accomplished at Holloman AFB. Many tow and releases tests were done to test the ground characteristics to include track to center-line. Several redesigns of the carry equip were done to get it right. The original test was August 11, 1998 at 0659 at Holloman AFB NM. THEN it went to Edwards.
@rocketmaster47 and the original x-40a can be viewed at the Air and Space Museum at Wright-Patterson AFB or at its web page online. The X-40a was approx 80% scale to the X-37b, which was launched into space this past April.
@rocketmaster47 The original X-40a test vehicle in all these videos is now in the National Museum of the USAF at Wright-Patterson AFB Ohio, at the R&D Gallery
how fast? thats information is not released on this particular craft. but for a idea on current shuttles, a normal 8 day mission can see a shuttle go round the planet more than 154.538421 times if it stays in orbit. ( this is based on it been at sea level using the earths circumference)
Keep in mind, that the X-37 Vehicle is an "orbiter". Its actual wings are used during descent through the atmosphere right down to a desired landing location. The acceleration achieved during descent is properly calculated, to provide a sufficient amount of lift the whole time it requires it.
Here are 10 facts about you: 1.you're reading my comment 2.now your thinking thats a stupied fact 4.you didnt notice that i skipped3 5.you're checking it now 6.you're smiling 7.you're still reading my comment 8.you know all you have read is true 10.you didnt notice i skipped 9 11.you're checking now 12.you didnt notice there only supposedto be 10 facts
Wing is not an issue - looks like a lifting body aircraft - look it up - remember when this thing is entering the atmosphere it needs to have very little drag.
@powerbroker3000 Exactly, People who understand (if not check Wiki) on lift, co-drag, angle of attack and so on. The flight path for landing is a very steep and fast using the speed to generate more drag resulting in more lift. It's only in final approach they seem to pull out for a long decent to touch down.
@ignatius95 it is not groom lake airforce base... groom lake airforce base is like 20x bigger then that its probably some where in arizona nasa has test centers there
@ignatius95 it is not groom lake airforce base... groom lake airforce base is like 20x bigger then that its probably some where in arizona nasa has test centers there
@torquemenistan im pretty sure theyre just testing its abilty to autopilot its self back to the runway. The aerodynamic profile would have been proven to work from months and months of windtunnel and CFD testing before they ever thought of making a prototype. But yea i can see how this is a reply to LTF85199 stupid comment about the wings. Maybe he should ring up NASA and tell them straigh away
@jamesward299 Yes that was a reply to LTF85199, and yes they're testing the craft if i could land on it's own. Lol those wings are designed like that so the drag coefficient will be much less compared to broader wings. [Geek mode_Shut down] Lol.
@torquemenistan Ha ha yea tell me about it, dont get much or a break from geek mode studying aerospace engineering! Yea loads less skin friction drag and lift induced. But also it would hardly create any lift what so ever i don't think it would be able to glid for long, its just falling with style lol But thats all its designed for
@LTF85199 im not trying to start a stupid argument, but im pretty sure NASA know more about teh importance of the size of the wings than you. just saying theyve probably tought all of taht through.
@allaboutconor - yep. and since it is unmanned, there's no need to worry about human frailty regarding g-forces, etc. the entire apparatus is likely capable of withstanding g-forces that would make your face slurp off of your head.
@allaboutconor apparently NASA dont hire engineers without PhDs and/or multiple engineering degrees...yes, you'd have thought they wouldve thuoght of that on day, erm, 1. they are thinking about things most people havent even dreamt of.
Obama cancels space program in order to make america more unhealthy, how? by making medical services FREE, why? because in most americans minds then thinks, i can do shit eat shit, f*ck shit, whatever happens, obama will take care of my ass.
not a good thing, medical assistance and healthcare is supposed to be each and everyone's responsibility, not the government's.
nakazatoGTR 5 months ago
@nakazatoGTR He cancled the shuttle program not the space program
DarPower1 3 months ago
@DarPower1 well you missed the entire point of my comment
nakazatoGTR 3 months ago
宇宙戦争の到来か?
TheTaka1115 6 months ago
I liked the part where they dropped the space ship
Trouttaranaki 7 months ago
NEW AND IMPROVED I LIKE THIS CORVETTE MODEL OVER THE FAMILY SEDAN SPACE SHUTTLE WE ARE LOOKING ATH THE FUTURE NOW . gO NASA GO AIR FORCE . TEAM USA CAN LEAD TOO .THE SHUTTLE RETIREMENT WAS A JOKE SOMETHING BETTER COMMETHS
DRAGONZOOOM 7 months ago
if there showing this whats in a hanger 20 stories below the surface
ryansachtleben 7 months ago
Thank you for sharing
many9662 7 months ago
aeroplane look so cool
jamecolte 7 months ago
This video is great.
saijai587 7 months ago
Good video.
jasperwillis5385 7 months ago
Nasa is great.
minami935 7 months ago
looks pretty cool, is this what's replacing the shuttle?
whatukno1975 9 months ago
lol
look my vids !
vanvin3333 11 months ago
USA makes the coolest shit,i like the space rocket that look like a plane whats it called the sti-1?or something.
omega4chimp 11 months ago
astronauts are histories.
shfbdfi1273 11 months ago
@shfbdfi1273 An astronaut is actually someone who explores or enters out space, so there will always be astronauts, even if those astronauts are pilots or even school teachers.
XMMxmmXM 11 months ago
Fuck the robot space plane, how about that release mechanism. Smooth as baby shit. Just think of the engineering that went into the latches and the parachute to pull the pins on them.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
@fertilizerspike A lot went into the design, redesign, modifications to the redesign, but all that was just so the vehicle could test with a proper release. and if you could see the setup up close you would realize its not as fancy as you think. Believe me I know. I was involved in the original testing at Holloman resulting in the FIRST test Aug 11, 1998.
rocketmaster47 11 months ago
@rocketmaster47
I was being facetious.
fertilizerspike 7 months ago
One day, it will be in space ^^
1Nekit1 1 year ago
@1Nekit1 its just came back from space after 7 months in space doing god knows what!!
dean000000001 1 year ago
@dean000000001 It was waiting for use, I think
1Nekit1 1 year ago
@dean000000001 That was the X-37, the full size version of the X-40 test vehicle. The X-40 in this video is now in the Air & Space Museum in Dayton OH
rocketmaster47 11 months ago
this thing recorded in 2001 .i wonder 2010 classified jet capabality..must be awesome
EXternalLife9 1 year ago
I would guess there's a high powered camera inside to possibly replace predator drones since it can stay up in space indefinitely and doesn't violate any no fly zones, and lastly it'll be closer to any spy satellites. Probably used to spy on China and Russia.
plmvirginiauva 1 year ago
Thank you for the answers guys. Now, what kind of mission takes 7 months and an ummanned spaceship to complete? Should I guess it was just orbiting earth all this time? Where the hell did it go? And if it is scaled is there an original size prototype constructed yet?
NeutralNegotiator 1 year ago
I know it's unmanned... but the way it lands without the expected flare it looks like a really hard landing.... until you see the drop at 3:30 and you see that the landing is PERFECT!!!
AlexSlams 1 year ago
They look like flying coffins lol
FireOfEire 1 year ago
ohh shit their makin unmanned space fighters.
tonyrosam 1 year ago
I like this, can I have one?
cjellwood 1 year ago
piece of junk, what they can't change the shape
proverb311031 1 year ago
I want one of those.
hattrick58 1 year ago
is this manned?
NeutralNegotiator 1 year ago
@NeutralNegotiator No, (apparently). I just seen on my homepage news and X-37B (unmanned) just returned to Earth after a 7 month operational flight. The Air Force claimed the mission was to test the spacecraft, wouldn't say about the contents of the payload. Apparently this thing is very secret, I just found out about it 10 minutes ago.
clintonearlwalker 1 year ago
@NeutralNegotiator No, this is a scale model.
dieselscience 1 year ago
@NeutralNegotiator
No. It would be similar to a predator drone.
ScienceIsKnowledge 1 year ago
No crash test?
Thetrutv 1 year ago
Even though it's stubby, at the rate of glide it becomes a lifiting body and can use a proportionally smaller wing to fly. Remember, a bulblebee flies even though it's wings are too small to provide adequate lift for it's body size.
uncleezra1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As the first Air Force NCO to work on the original X-40 testing I can reply to all the stupid comments. All aerodynamic testing was completed prior to any assembly by Boeing. Numerous ground testing was accomplished at Holloman AFB. Many tow and releases tests were done to test the ground characteristics to include track to center-line. Several redesigns of the carry equip were done to get it right. The original test was August 11, 1998 at 0659 at Holloman AFB NM. THEN it went to Edwards.
rocketmaster47 1 year ago
As the first Air Force NCO to work on the original X-40 testing I can reply to all the stupid comments. All aerodynamic testing was completed prior to any assembly by Boeing. Numerous ground testing was accomplished at Holloman AFB. Many tow and releases tests were done to test the ground characteristics to include track to center-line. Several redesigns of the carry equip were done to get it right. The original test was August 11, 1998 at 0659 at Holloman AFB NM. THEN it went to Edwards.
rocketmaster47 1 year ago
@rocketmaster47 and the original x-40a can be viewed at the Air and Space Museum at Wright-Patterson AFB or at its web page online. The X-40a was approx 80% scale to the X-37b, which was launched into space this past April.
rocketmaster47 1 year ago
@rocketmaster47 The original X-40a test vehicle in all these videos is now in the National Museum of the USAF at Wright-Patterson AFB Ohio, at the R&D Gallery
rocketmaster47 1 year ago
how fast? thats information is not released on this particular craft. but for a idea on current shuttles, a normal 8 day mission can see a shuttle go round the planet more than 154.538421 times if it stays in orbit. ( this is based on it been at sea level using the earths circumference)
barmybrummy1988 1 year ago
Nice landing
toranacar 1 year ago
what does this thing even do
Pauliebuck 1 year ago
@Pauliebuck
Well, it's an UAV...
bcta302 1 year ago
I wonder what speed this craft is capable of running?
billiepickles 1 year ago
@billiepickles
Mach 26. Give or take.
G777GUN 1 year ago
Keep in mind, that the X-37 Vehicle is an "orbiter". Its actual wings are used during descent through the atmosphere right down to a desired landing location. The acceleration achieved during descent is properly calculated, to provide a sufficient amount of lift the whole time it requires it.
MrSkunkwork 1 year ago
trex com
MyPenis13inchGirlFit 1 year ago
when can I pick this up at my local nasa dealership? I need to get to a conference in Japan in 30 minutes.
rayn1988 1 year ago
I sat there for one whole minute trying to turn up the sound until I realized there was none. XD
freeridemtb2 1 year ago 2
@freeridemtb2: You have to use the 'Marshmallow flip' dial.
tsns1 1 year ago
is this going to take the place of the current orbiters?
edgar5001 1 year ago
of course they have its nasa not some stupid little science project group of nerds.
thomaspenguin717 1 year ago
@thomaspenguin717 Nerds??? Grow the fuck up. Fucking idiot!
SirBser 1 year ago
someday that will be how all plains land... by themself
LostMoHopeSo21 1 year ago
news said that this is even more powerful than magnets
bluntsh00ter 1 year ago
News said that this is even more powerful than a nuke :O
Super2Donny 1 year ago
@Super2Donny yup yup thats what i read in the times homie
bennyJW3 1 year ago
cool! we can now drop something from high altitude without breaking it! oh wait we can already do that with parachutes
heimatzusein 1 year ago
@heimatzusein I guess you can't tell that this isnt it's purpose.. These are just tests to see how it flies and make sure everything works properly..
RefleXSnipers 1 year ago
looks to me that the wings are prefect for a controlled landing. I do not believe they are made for sustained flight and take off.
KingJSA 1 year ago
The wing is small because it's only controlling the craft..these wings could never be used for lift..which is why the wings on a plane are larger
427yenko67 1 year ago
yey Earth first Real Star fighter ship built by Nasa, cool,
sideslide23 1 year ago
2:46 pay me to hold the parachute! :D
TheDavidMN 1 year ago 2
Very cool!
carp1844 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pr1vateToX 1 year ago
Wing is not an issue - looks like a lifting body aircraft - look it up - remember when this thing is entering the atmosphere it needs to have very little drag.
powerbroker3000 1 year ago
@powerbroker3000 Exactly, People who understand (if not check Wiki) on lift, co-drag, angle of attack and so on. The flight path for landing is a very steep and fast using the speed to generate more drag resulting in more lift. It's only in final approach they seem to pull out for a long decent to touch down.
stonerscolony 1 year ago
Area 51!
ignatius95 1 year ago 15
@ignatius95
there is no Area51 ;-) its called Homey Airport. its not Secret any more its on the map now.
vonriktoven 1 year ago
@vonriktoven Great! Let me have a look lol
ignatius95 1 year ago
@ignatius95 i thought so too! but... the runways are in a different configuration (i checked on google earth). :(
Sassafrasican 1 year ago
@ignatius95 actually it's runway 22R at Edwards. Dryden Flight Research Center in California
RufftaMan 1 year ago
@ignatius95, sorry my mistake, it's 22L, and that was supposed to mean Edwards Air-Force Base. (near Los Angeles)
RufftaMan 1 year ago
@ignatius95 it is not groom lake airforce base... groom lake airforce base is like 20x bigger then that its probably some where in arizona nasa has test centers there
originalbrodyg420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ignatius95 it is not groom lake airforce base... groom lake airforce base is like 20x bigger then that its probably some where in arizona nasa has test centers there
originalbrodyg420 1 year ago
@ignatius95 nope, its edwards...
EduEnYT 1 year ago
@ignatius95 u stpid, read the news fag. this should save me some conflict time: it was in california dumbshit
Eugaspo 1 year ago
@Eugaspo I am in Hong Kong... and we don't have news about this on tv....and... Why so seriously? lol
ignatius95 1 year ago
@ignatius95 so what does this do does it drop and land by its self ??
anthonybian1 1 year ago
@anthonybian1 Exactly, fully autonomous.
rocketmaster47 11 months ago
@ignatius95 Edwards Air Force Base
vitraloetten 8 months ago 2
Would fail a check ride. Not runway center line.
EJ25RUN 1 year ago
Are the wheels pulled by gravity? Or it uses electricity?
robert0joe 1 year ago
Comment removed
tysonblair 1 year ago
wings are ok, NASA know's what they're doing..and that's why they're testing it...to see if their ddesign works..
torquemenistan 1 year ago
@torquemenistan im pretty sure theyre just testing its abilty to autopilot its self back to the runway. The aerodynamic profile would have been proven to work from months and months of windtunnel and CFD testing before they ever thought of making a prototype. But yea i can see how this is a reply to LTF85199 stupid comment about the wings. Maybe he should ring up NASA and tell them straigh away
jamesward299 1 year ago
@jamesward299 Yes that was a reply to LTF85199, and yes they're testing the craft if i could land on it's own. Lol those wings are designed like that so the drag coefficient will be much less compared to broader wings. [Geek mode_Shut down] Lol.
torquemenistan 1 year ago
@torquemenistan Ha ha yea tell me about it, dont get much or a break from geek mode studying aerospace engineering! Yea loads less skin friction drag and lift induced. But also it would hardly create any lift what so ever i don't think it would be able to glid for long, its just falling with style lol But thats all its designed for
jamesward299 1 year ago
Testing all day long
DrPilotRedC 1 year ago
good!!!
bkingair350 1 year ago
wings too small , might stall easier than the current shuttle..
LTF85199 1 year ago
@LTF85199 im not trying to start a stupid argument, but im pretty sure NASA know more about teh importance of the size of the wings than you. just saying theyve probably tought all of taht through.
allaboutconor 1 year ago 44
Comment removed
LTF85199 1 year ago
@allaboutconor - yep. and since it is unmanned, there's no need to worry about human frailty regarding g-forces, etc. the entire apparatus is likely capable of withstanding g-forces that would make your face slurp off of your head.
OceanderTethyseus 1 year ago
@allaboutconor apparently NASA dont hire engineers without PhDs and/or multiple engineering degrees...yes, you'd have thought they wouldve thuoght of that on day, erm, 1. they are thinking about things most people havent even dreamt of.
rcaddict72 7 months ago
@LTF85199 well aperently the current one glides like a brick too..
boobyboob69 1 year ago
@LTF85199 Maybeyou should ring up nasa and tell them straigh away!!
jamesward299 1 year ago
Is it an unmaned vehicle?
captain4004 1 year ago
@captain4004 how do you think ;)?
Altan0x 1 year ago
Does it need a rocket to launch this "future space vehicle"? or Does it fly to space with a single jet engine?
applesweeter 1 year ago
Cute.
Hanzi89 1 year ago