Another way of putting it is that Mystik is declaring that this remix is his.
Aquagen Manner remixed this song though. So who's lying here? Mystik's name NEVER shows up on any vinyls. I don't know why people keep defending him when he's clearly stealing songs and labelling them as his own.
@AWDracer i think everyone knows its a remix. i listen to his songs cause its a different version. if i want to listen to the original then i will. but i want to hear the remix. i dont care who makes it as long as i hear it....
@king420420420420 The remixer has to be adding some definite new elements to the song. Changing the pitch or speeding up the song does not fit under that category. It still doesn't make it Mystik's remix. He would be making a compilation of the songs, which is okay if he gives credit to the original artists, but he doesn't. THAT'S the problem.
@king420420420420 He might have done something to the song but the difference is so minute that it can't truly be called a remix. Listen to the original and then listen to a remix by the Aquagen Manner, THAT'S what you call a remix. This just looks like a modification to Aquagen Manner's remix, which doesn't make it Mystik's remix. I hope that's not too confusing for you.
@king420420420420 Also, you have to remember, when you remix or work with someone else's material, it is courtesy to give credit to the original somewhere. All reputable artists who use the material, regardless of great or small, give credit to the original artist/producer. Mystik's CDs which he SELLS to people, contain only his name along with the song title which sometimes differs from the real songs that he took.
@king420420420420 I've compared the songs that he's allegedly touched and the song which he apparently took it from and the differences are so small that it's really really a stretch to say he spent 5 minutes on it. To put this into perspective, I'm sure you could do the same amount of work he's done on the songs that he claims to be his; that's how illegitimate he really is. I'm tired of seeing his name plastered around when he clearly does not deserve any credit.
The answer is DJ. Mystik!
ngc22072001 7 months ago
if you dont like this then... your dont have a subwoofer or it is broken!
DevvoHardstyle 1 year ago
Another way of putting it is that Mystik is declaring that this remix is his.
Aquagen Manner remixed this song though. So who's lying here? Mystik's name NEVER shows up on any vinyls. I don't know why people keep defending him when he's clearly stealing songs and labelling them as his own.
AWDracer 1 year ago
not bad
Bosanac0303 2 years ago
Song is called Mark 'Oh Presents Daisy Dee - Love Is The Answer (Aquagen Männer Remix)
celestiatransica 3 years ago
Yup - DJ Mystik is a notable song stealer. His labelling just makes it seem like he produced the song. Very misleading tactic.
AWDracer 2 years ago
@AWDracer i think everyone knows its a remix. i listen to his songs cause its a different version. if i want to listen to the original then i will. but i want to hear the remix. i dont care who makes it as long as i hear it....
king420420420420 1 year ago
@king420420420420 The remixer has to be adding some definite new elements to the song. Changing the pitch or speeding up the song does not fit under that category. It still doesn't make it Mystik's remix. He would be making a compilation of the songs, which is okay if he gives credit to the original artists, but he doesn't. THAT'S the problem.
AWDracer 1 year ago
@AWDracer are u saying he did nothing to the song?
king420420420420 1 year ago
@king420420420420 He might have done something to the song but the difference is so minute that it can't truly be called a remix. Listen to the original and then listen to a remix by the Aquagen Manner, THAT'S what you call a remix. This just looks like a modification to Aquagen Manner's remix, which doesn't make it Mystik's remix. I hope that's not too confusing for you.
AWDracer 1 year ago
@king420420420420 Also, you have to remember, when you remix or work with someone else's material, it is courtesy to give credit to the original somewhere. All reputable artists who use the material, regardless of great or small, give credit to the original artist/producer. Mystik's CDs which he SELLS to people, contain only his name along with the song title which sometimes differs from the real songs that he took.
AWDracer 1 year ago
@king420420420420 I've compared the songs that he's allegedly touched and the song which he apparently took it from and the differences are so small that it's really really a stretch to say he spent 5 minutes on it. To put this into perspective, I'm sure you could do the same amount of work he's done on the songs that he claims to be his; that's how illegitimate he really is. I'm tired of seeing his name plastered around when he clearly does not deserve any credit.
AWDracer 1 year ago
@AWDracer then do u know the names of the real dj's?
king420420420420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@king420420420420 It's been said that this song is Mark 'Oh Presents Daisy Dee - Love Is The Answer (Aquagen Männer Remix).
AWDracer 1 year ago