Added: 3 years ago
From: messiahjonz
Views: 286
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ok. SO u have read Terra non-firma by Dr James Maxlow. - Australian geologist.?

    do u need to be spoon fed the links... or just tell me you havnt?

    your books are old 71, 76 -. read maxlow's which u cough mention about...

  • @VirtualRealityTV Read it... it is nonsense as well.

    Curious as to your double post.

  • @messiahjonz read it have you.! nonsense is it.? and the data about the age of the ocean beds from the rifts irrelevant science . darn case closed thanks. p.s dbl post removed accident.

  • @VirtualRealityTV Which "rifts" are you referring to?

    The ages of oceanic crusts is predicted by Plate Tectonics, and has been verified and documented.

    This is the same lame arguments creationists try to use for a young Earth.

    It is not "irrelevant science"... just poor science.

  • Comment removed

  • I am an uneducated person. But I believe this "hypothesis" is way too ignored by the mainstream media. I mean why don't they even mention it on the science channel. With all the programs about geology and plate techtonics that I've seen because they know it is correct and it rocks the hell out of their little apple cart. I watched one yesterday and it showed lava solidifying into rock underwater, and it expanded as it cooled and cracked just like the Adams Models of Expanding Earth.

  • @Megajunkie01001 Unfortunately, the mainstream media are not the people to go to for science information or to get an education.

    This expanding Earth idea was proposed over a hundred years ago, and dismissed by the scientific community for lack of evidence.

    As for lava under water... those are called "pillow lava", and do not crack due to expansion, but cooling.

    The Earth is not expanding and adams is just a cartoonist.

    It is good that you seek answers, get them from books, not TV.

  • @messiahjonz So why does the science channel even exist? And I still I believe that this Idea is possible and so interesting that it deserves to be acknowledged by the world.

  • @Megajunkie01001 TV is for entertainment.

    As for acknowledgment of EE, it was nearly a century ago, and found to be nothing more than an idea, due to it having no applicable tests to support it.

    Plate tectonics does have those tests, and does it better.

    Not trying to insult you, but you did start this conversation by stating that you are uneducated.

    Would you have an operation performed by an uneducated doctor that wanted to use techniques from 100 years ago?

    That is EE.

  • you wanna say this and you wanna say this and you wanna say this? You Don't want to be famous, course not that's why you on youtube.

  • @Neobrachus Famous?

    If I wanted fame I would not play around on YT, sorry to burst your cum bubble kid.

    YT is for entertainment, this is why I have tolerated your posts for so long, because I like to laugh at morons like you.

    Presently, your entertainment value has expired...

  • Is this guy a idiot or what.... who pressed this guys button.

    BIG THUMBS DOWN

  • @Gouanaco Hey neobrachus... you are this obsessed with me and my videos, and you crave attention so much that you have to create additional names to make posts?

    Pathetic.

  • neobatrachus is not a toad but rather an Australian burrowing from. Ecologically its like saying iguana are agmids.

  • Educated people once thought the world was flat and we were the centre of the universe

  • @Neobrachus So did idiots... what is your point?

  • @messiahjonz what im saying is that the plate tectonic is just a theory. Theories come theories go depending on the paradigm.

    I think its important to learn new ideas and concepts even if they are right or wrong. That how we grow.

    I think you and i are quiet different but if you "wanna catch more flys with honey" tone down the your attitude on your video's. because you seriously come across as rude and aggrogant.

    Good luck with you world domination of being right !!!!!

  • @Neobrachus You claim to have degrees and then claim "just a theory"?

    As far as I am concerned, I have dominated you and I am correct.

    End of discussion.

  • @messiahjonz THAT IS RIGHT END OF DISCUSSION ....... The incompetence you posses, im sorry but can help but LMAO when i watch your videos . Who do you teach, pre-schoolers? I manage to give talks to many thousands of people. It more like a discussion because i like to hear what OTHER PEOPLE have to say.

    That's is right degrees mean shit, sorry a " piece of paper". I have two degrees and a diploma. Most of my learning is not just from university with the lectures spoon feeding selected books.

  • @Neobrachus Replete with typos and gramatical errors and I am incompetent?

    Who is the incompetent one here? I your degrees mean "shit", and you claim to have two, who is the one that wasted their time?

    Funny that you continue to come back to my videos and comment on them, yet never answer one question I ask.

    Again, have a nice life kid.

  • Dude, books once stated the world was once flat too.......... So what is your point?

  • @Neobrachus Really? Books stated this? Name three books that have claimed the Earth is flat please. Give a proper citation.

  • The Sun is expanding is it not? and Mercury is expanding too is it not? Ask NASA they tell you that it is they..... so why not Earth. I can think of numerous reason why the earth is expanding biologically, gelogically and it can be seen else where so let test the theory. Stop bringing you religious philosophies into the scientific arena.

    Much of the pacific ocean crust is no older than 70 million years old.

    Dude your name say it all MESSIAH you have the biggest Ego.

  • @Neobrachus neobrachus?

    More like Neobatrachus

  • @messiahjonz Yes good one a Neobatrachus, we have 20 + species here in Australia, I am a field ecologist - and my name does not refer to any of them.

    Can you answer these questions above instead of thinking that you have corrected my miss spelt name.

  • @messiahjonz No dude my name is not miss spelt, I know what is a Neobatrachus sp. is . Im a field ecologist so if you got any question on Australian amphibians i will answer them for you.

    Could you answer my questions above?

  • @messiahjonz

    neobachus does not = Neobatrachus sp. So i not sure what your trying to get at......... If you are interested in Australian Amphibians im happy to share my knowledge as i am a field ecologist.

    Why can you answer my questions above?

  • @Neobrachus I did not claim that you misspelt your name...

    I was in fact calling you a toad.

    As for your question... since you spammed to several of my videos many times I took you as a nuisance.

    You made a claim in your questions which I requested a citation for. When you bother to cite your sources, I will bother to answer your questions.

  • @messiahjonz A neoabtrachus is NOT A TOAD it is an Australian burrowing frog genus.

  • Too bad NASA says by measurements from outerspace the Earth is expanding.

    You'll have to learn how to keep an open mind. Like for instance when Genesis calls terra firma "without form and void" it flys in the face of reason as even water takes the form of the container and takes up space.

    Then science comes along and shows that E=mc^2 showing that Earth was energy first showing that Genesis was highly accurate.

    Keep your mind open to an expanding Earth as NASA says it is expanding.

  • I request for you to cite your NASA source and all you can say is "too bad NASA says..."

    I went on NASA's homepage, searched "expanding earth", clicked on a link concerning the topic, "FAQ: "The Great Magnet, the Earth "

    Read the second question concerning expanding earth. It is answered by Dr David P Stern NASA retired emeritus.

    NASA's stance is that the earth is neither contracting nor expanding.

    Keeping an open mind does not mean believing in crap.

  • My fried what are you talking about ? Do you want to say that the continents don't fit in the other side of the ocean ?

    If you think that they don't.... you are rejecting the plate tectonics also.. remember all the continents fit together in Pangea !!!

  • Pangea... yes.

    Does Pangea not have any edges?

    For example: an island has edges.

    Or does Pangea connect all land together without an ocean or oceanic crust?

    For example: expanding earth idea.

    The answer is...

    Pangea was a island supercontinent, with edges. These edges do not fit together with other portions of the continents.

    This is what I speak of in this video.

    You claim I am rejecting PT by stating only one side fits... that i bullshit.

    Get an education please.

  • Hi dear messiahjonz,

    sorry for being late with my answer! So how do you know that only one side fits ? Who told you that ?

    The separation of the Asia, Australia and American continents has been in a much higher speed than the separation of the American continents from Europe and Africa.

    If you don't believe me, please check the ages of the different parts of the earth. You will see that all the oceans are not older than 200 million years. They ware simply not there !!!

  • None of these expanding Earth proponents (like it is some valid moment) have read about the science behind plate tectonics... it's really quite incredible what has been figured out without having to any wild conclusions based on dogma. I think these expanding Earth folks should be given free reign... have at it. Slums of the mind tend to breed disease quick. Good luck.

  • Most cite adams as their source.

    The online cartoonist with no college education in science, or anything for that matter.

    Pathetic.

  • Have just made a video on the same subject, more or less ;-) You make the point that the expanding earth theorist fail to explain the machinism and this s true, but we must rember that there is no complete explaination with the common plate concept either.

  • There is an explanation, it simply is difficult to test, although, in some aspects, it is observable.

    (convection)

  • take your ear ring out and get off the dope, dickhead

  • OK votebot...

  • sadly, he actually was very smart and a great musician.

    just bought into the conspiricy theory (don't ask about the moon landings) and was a fundamentalist. (more mental than fun)

  • Flat earth requires one being a fundie to some degree.

  • watch out they will be calling you a "geologoismist" as well as an "evolutionist". (maybe a gravitationalist too)

    good job.

    I researched this stuff once as (when I lived in a very religious community) I actually knew a flat earther.

    btw for real laughs check that stuff out.

  • Only a flathead would believe in a flat earth.

  • god job dealing with this concept, it's great to hear from people who actually know the subject when talking about the structure of the earth.

    i'm sick of the hovindist garbage that christian zombies keep repeating ad nauseum, and even some muslims now.

  • Yeah, the "it is never the fact of evolution, just theory of evolution" guy is pretty lame.

  • being wrong is not an argument :P

  • lol

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more