OK, little factoid here: did you know that the guys in the background (in this video from 1m06s onwards) actually sing "Frères Jacques"? Just like the Beatles did on the original. They came up with that idea, because it is the same melody.
To learn how to hear the hidden message in Beatles songs, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read through the section about The Beatles. This could change the world. Thumbs up this comment, copy and paste it on other songs.
I was at his Giants Stadium concert back in '93. When I heard him and his band do this song, there was'nt a person there who did'nt have a smile on his or her face.
the beatles are the most talented musicians of the last century, they created modern music, without their innovations you couldn't listen to any of todays music acts, and what the fuck is big time rush, i guess some gay ass stuff like jonas brothers or that shit.-
no, i know big time rush because of my 7 year old cousin, they're the NICK equivalent of Disneys Jonas Brothers, and the difference between the two is the JBs try to look like they play guitars while the BTR are just standing around doing boygroup shit.
@thefirstak47 please never compare the greatest band of all time to some stupid ass band of "pretty boys" who lip sync and don't know shit about making good music.
As if I ever said or implied that,that's a strawman. Good changes = still good,bad changes=bad. Single insipid sounding guitar on Paperback Writer = bad change.
Lol,I thought a heated insult was headed my way...but sure,off pitch singing detracts too.You might wonder why Paul McCartney isn't a little more selective considering he can have almost anybody play for him...go figure.
@spentonmediocrity Oh yeah sorry I forgot, its the internet. Here goes: RAGHAGHAHGHAHG I HATE YOU FOR DISAGREEI:NG WITH ME GO DIE CAR FIRE STRANGLE MURDER. There, now order has returned to the youtubecommentverse.
idk how paul was able to perform this song without the beatles... if i did this without the beatles, i would cry on stage... how can he go on without john lennon?
multibigandy is write...george had lung cancer and paul still does drugs and i tihnk he's gonna die soon...but ringo hs got to be the healthiest of all of them
lol for all the people that believed he died in 66, if he really did die and there was a cover up, don't you think that the man who was replacing him would just stop after the beatles? why keep going? what was the point of the whole thing?,,,,so there would be a 4th beatle member....when the beatles were done if the whole story were to be true, the imposter wouldn't keep going on and trying to do better things.
Paul was killed by a turtle falling on his head in 1967, and George was killed in 1991 while he was singing at a concert in Iraq during Desert Storm. Ringo was also killed in 2003 when somebody dropped boiling McDonald's coffee on him and gave him a heart attack. Only John is still alive and he's married to someone called Yoko, a beautiful blonde with blue eyes.
As smart as the beatles were i don't think they could have pulled off a stunt like replacing paul mccartney. And it's almost impossible that they'd find a guy that looked like him and played the bass, piano, guitar, violin AND had the ability to write the songs he did with wings. END OF
John and George are dead? You gotta be kidding me! How did this happen? When? Who? How will we ever survive the loss? Imagine the worlds confusion when this gets out! What ever will we do?
wow what the bloody hell happend Paul use to own now he got a weird haircut(only in the 90's i suppose) AND LOST HIS AWESOME BRITHIS ACCENT THAT MADE HIM OWN
Well, the Beatles were notorious for their ability to sing in just about any way needed for the song. As Paul got older he slowly lost this ability, he spent so long singing in an American blues fashion like most of his later work that it became his work. it's good to know he can still do the voice for hey jude :D
Unfortunately, as the Beatles are not immortal and immune to aging as we all wish they would be, they lose some of their vocal flair along the years, as previously stated, but it's good to know even then they sing just as good.
Great song... great vocal performance under windy conditions...but I really hate the 80-s 90-s use of "guitar Chorus" effects. Yuck. Check out Rusty Anderson playing it in recent live shows... that tone rocks.
this is wierder sounding like without everybody in the beatles and it sounds rock n rollish (more rock n rollish) like i dont know it just sounds very different
This is nice. The things I don't like are the lead guitar tone and the harmonies.
That guitar sound is crappy! The harmonies sound like they're straining to reach the notes the way John and George did so easily. No one can match they're singing abilities on stage. Nobody! And they didn't have any newfangled stage monitors either.
She isn't a very good singer but a lot of her songs are good and she is a GREAT vocalist (meaning her screaming on the Plastic Ono Album and similar works) . . . you don't have to agree but her style is grand.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
guh he's become such a show boater . . . this sounds like a cover; like he didn't even right it . . . I have to admit I did like the "ow" after the second "paperback writer" harmony but I mean c'mon he's totally forgotten who he was . . . can't cope without Lennon I guess haha
it's not just that he got older he's doing different stuff that show his stylings have changed . . . If he it was just that his voice was tired and old I wouldn't have said anything . . .
It's called playing your own song the way you want to play it. Finding...if they did it this way on the original record and 40 years later did it any other way, you would say it isn't right because of the way YOU are USED TO HEARING IT. I doubt if you thought of that though.
Wow wow don't tell me what I think. I never said I didn't still like the song but if it was recorded this way originally I wouldn't like the studio version as much. I just don't like his 90s pop vocal expression here.
p.s. Don't act as if you are smarter than someone (ex.: "I doubt if you thought of that though.") because people who are less kind than me will just use those words in some other post against you . . . in short you're just setting yourself up for someone to rip you a new one.
I already stated that I wasn't talking about the age in his voice . . . but this is the last time Ima comment on this because none of you can see it so it's no use in discussing it.
I don't think I said I win, I wouldn't do that,(though it's been a long time since I was at this page) so maybe I did say that to be difficult. However, it still sounds like a bad cover so I think both of us, Me and Macca, lose. Though, I don't ever remember competing, just sharing my opinion.
Yep, go Billy Shepherd. Orbandsceptre27, have a look at Shea stadium concert '65. Billy Shepherd's first and only live performance for the Beatles. Wonder where Paul was that they had to use the sub? Maybe on a bender somewhere. The fact that they got away with this must have given them the confidence to try it full time when Paul actually died in '67.
OK, little factoid here: did you know that the guys in the background (in this video from 1m06s onwards) actually sing "Frères Jacques"? Just like the Beatles did on the original. They came up with that idea, because it is the same melody.
drdalet 3 months ago
great song,but.... nothing compares to the beatles performing it
chilango7259 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To learn how to hear the hidden message in Beatles songs, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read through the section about The Beatles. This could change the world. Thumbs up this comment, copy and paste it on other songs.
michael777776 6 months ago
That bass is not original? It should be a white spot too?
sockerbiten2 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why dont thees old peeple stay at home and learn something from a grat singer as justin beiber is better then this gy will be ever!
sniperin223 10 months ago
@sniperin223 Are you saying that bieber loser is better than a legend? By the way, I'm actually 13
john1968326 10 months ago 3
@sniperin223 fuck you, justin bieber songs is full of bullshit just like your comment.
aserostrong 8 months ago
@sniperin223 come back here in fourty years and we'll all see how many Bieber songs we can all remember.
tomdolan07 8 months ago
@tomdolan07 the funny thing is that bieber will be remembered. as that kid who looked like a girl and every one hated..........
tinseth7 6 months ago
@sniperin223 This is REAL music not some autotune shit
BewareOfGrayson 6 months ago
@sniperin223 so true....
cesarr956 4 months ago
One of my favourite bass lines
sp1midholm 1 year ago 3
william campbell? it's a joke don't get mad
mecagoensonymusic 1 year ago
22 idiotas+ en el mundo
PauloSumonte 1 year ago 5
thank god he changed that band. 2010 version is much more rocker and stronger...
mecetnoca 1 year ago
thats only a 1/4 of the power
scotty101ire 1 year ago
I was at his Giants Stadium concert back in '93. When I heard him and his band do this song, there was'nt a person there who did'nt have a smile on his or her face.
alonenjersey 1 year ago
what date was this case i was born in 1993
JeretLedger1985 1 year ago
@JeretLedger1985 The date was 15 June 1993. @ the Blockbuster Pavilion Charlotte NC, USA.
musiclovinlady1 1 year ago
@musiclovinlady1 Damnit I was born June 17.
JeretLedger1985 1 year ago
@JeretLedger1985
Obviously from the womb, you heard Sir Paul McCartney, and you decided you needed to get out and hear this awesome song.
TheRandomfanboy 1 year ago
@TheRandomfanboy Thats it exactly.
JeretLedger1985 1 year ago
@musiclovinlady1 a few days short of his 51st birthday.
Sungodv 1 year ago
the beatles are sort of like big time rush... except the guitars
thefirstak47 1 year ago
@thefirstak47
wow, you're such a fucking little joke.
the beatles are the most talented musicians of the last century, they created modern music, without their innovations you couldn't listen to any of todays music acts, and what the fuck is big time rush, i guess some gay ass stuff like jonas brothers or that shit.-
OropherThranduil 1 year ago
@OropherThranduil
i think '' @thefirstak47 ''
meant the band rush, who have been around for nearly 40 years dude...
Scythe0001 1 year ago
@Scythe0001
no, i know big time rush because of my 7 year old cousin, they're the NICK equivalent of Disneys Jonas Brothers, and the difference between the two is the JBs try to look like they play guitars while the BTR are just standing around doing boygroup shit.
OropherThranduil 1 year ago
Comment removed
OropherThranduil 1 year ago
@thefirstak47 Seriously???????? ;-D Aha Why you must be sufferin from a case of Helter Skelter?! PEACE!
jetbirdzme 1 year ago
@thefirstak47 please never compare the greatest band of all time to some stupid ass band of "pretty boys" who lip sync and don't know shit about making good music.
Imxoneofthefallen 1 year ago
@Imxoneofthefallen sorry
thefirstak47 1 year ago
@thefirstak47 what????? uhmm. wow man...... thats just sad.
michaelat348 1 year ago
M.A.S.T.E.R
maddd82 1 year ago
Paul McCartney...They have to cryogenically freeze him when he does go and revive him in 200 years. Beatles must somehow live on!!!
LennonMeringuePie 1 year ago
Forced vocals. I like Paul from the latest years. He has more concern about his art..
Trixisforkidz 1 year ago
what a Legend
2312Ben 1 year ago
Limp version - all the K-I-C-K has gone, he`s got no 1 up there as a 2nd vocal to back him up with Lennon gone ; (
kcirdrab 1 year ago
well old song, justin bieber is modern therefore better.
felisberto2 1 year ago
@felisberto2 u fail at common knowledge being modern doesnt make it better and beiber just sucks
trevwagner94 1 year ago
@felisberto2
so.. Bieber > beatles?
lord you be trollin'
thepace 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.take a deep breath
2. think of someone u like
3. press F10 5 times
4. send this to 5 youtube videos
5. look at ur backround
drummerfortheband 1 year ago
nice mullet.
LizzieLovesSkyline 1 year ago
If you play guitar for Paul Mcartney, covering the Beatles ,you have NO BUSINESS playing a strat into a chorus pedal and Marshal rig(no krang,wtf??)
Anything but an AC30 amp is blasphemy.
spentonmediocrity 1 year ago
@spentonmediocrity Because making any kind of change to a song is bad right? Hurr.
hojima 1 year ago
@hojima
As if I ever said or implied that,that's a strawman. Good changes = still good,bad changes=bad. Single insipid sounding guitar on Paperback Writer = bad change.
spentonmediocrity 1 year ago
@spentonmediocrity Either way it pales in comparison to him singing out of tune :s
hojima 1 year ago
@hojima
Lol,I thought a heated insult was headed my way...but sure,off pitch singing detracts too.You might wonder why Paul McCartney isn't a little more selective considering he can have almost anybody play for him...go figure.
spentonmediocrity 1 year ago
@spentonmediocrity Oh yeah sorry I forgot, its the internet. Here goes: RAGHAGHAHGHAHG I HATE YOU FOR DISAGREEI:NG WITH ME GO DIE CAR FIRE STRANGLE MURDER. There, now order has returned to the youtubecommentverse.
hojima 1 year ago
@hojima :)
spentonmediocrity 1 year ago
At least the microphone is keeping still.
cometandcupids 1 year ago 3
...John needs to be there,without John,there is no Beatles
Vide0Gam8r 1 year ago
@PwnPancake Last time I saw anything of Ringo he looked great.
Keruaran 1 year ago
idk how paul was able to perform this song without the beatles... if i did this without the beatles, i would cry on stage... how can he go on without john lennon?
sacramentolove 1 year ago
@sacramentolove How can he go on, the same way any musician or creative person goes on, by writing songs and doing what you do...
Keruaran 1 year ago
@Keruaran ?
sacramentolove 1 year ago
Paul's gonna live 'til he's 90. He looks and acts healthy as fuck. Besides, pot has never killed anyone
Randlor 1 year ago 70
@Randlor not true....pot killed my cousin. so sad.
billheartyface 1 year ago
@Randlor
No pot never killed anyone.Only brain cells
winterlandboy 1 year ago
@Randlor
Ferankooo 1 year ago
@Randlor I hope he reaches 100, it´s posible half of my old family did.
frikinjoe 1 year ago
@Randlor Damn... you just jinxed him!! hahahahaha ~KK
KingHopeMusic 1 year ago
@Randlor I wish I could agree (though i DO think Paul's gonna live till he's 90, at least) but pot has killed someone very dear to me.
1cjl2 1 year ago
@Randlor Neither has meat, but he seems to be against that!
greenwich1754 1 year ago
@greenwich1754
Depends on the quantity you eat.
Too much meat can increase chances of cancer/heart problems.
Also, he is against it for the animals sake, not so much for his health.
AyashaYumi 11 months ago
@Randlor haha yes!
MrMojoRisin53 4 months ago
multibigandy is write...george had lung cancer and paul still does drugs and i tihnk he's gonna die soon...but ringo hs got to be the healthiest of all of them
haden12ify 2 years ago
lol for all the people that believed he died in 66, if he really did die and there was a cover up, don't you think that the man who was replacing him would just stop after the beatles? why keep going? what was the point of the whole thing?,,,,so there would be a 4th beatle member....when the beatles were done if the whole story were to be true, the imposter wouldn't keep going on and trying to do better things.
tokestAr420 2 years ago
@tokestAr420 Some people are just retarded...
Keruaran 1 year ago
BLACK RINGO YAY!!!!
orchestrateddeath 2 years ago 68
@orchestrateddeath LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
dbapz93 1 year ago
@orchestrateddeath a BLINGO!! hahah oh SNL.....
1021779 9 months ago
@1021779 thats the SAME THING I WAS THINKING!!!!
Dan5cerKa5t 6 months ago
@orchestrateddeath LMAO!
ThePrimomist 5 months ago
blurred videos
ferdinandsantos02 2 years ago
Paul was killed by a turtle falling on his head in 1967, and George was killed in 1991 while he was singing at a concert in Iraq during Desert Storm. Ringo was also killed in 2003 when somebody dropped boiling McDonald's coffee on him and gave him a heart attack. Only John is still alive and he's married to someone called Yoko, a beautiful blonde with blue eyes.
Cellsolid 2 years ago 3
hahahaha
TheMANright101 2 years ago
@Cellsolid lmao
R0KURU 2 years ago
Thanks for making my day. I laughed so hard I cried! What an incredibly funny bunch of BS. Love it!
steveguion 1 year ago
As smart as the beatles were i don't think they could have pulled off a stunt like replacing paul mccartney. And it's almost impossible that they'd find a guy that looked like him and played the bass, piano, guitar, violin AND had the ability to write the songs he did with wings. END OF
PJWTh3R41N 2 years ago
END OF? end of what story teller?
orchestrateddeath 2 years ago
dude its like this john died in 1980 because this wacko killed him and george died in 2001 because of cancer
MultiBigAndy 2 years ago
wats the really story behind the beattle scandal about the Paul McCartney death in 1966?
pptripulantesiempre 2 years ago
@pptripulantesiempre It's a bunch of baloney. Paul McCartney is still alive, and is the REAL Beatle. I love you Paul!
misachaan 2 years ago
6nikola9 has a documentary about the Paul is dead fiasco on his uploads. It's pretty interesting.
MrUnderdog1970 2 years ago
@pptripulantesiempre the Beatles did that to just make money but it is funny to see all of the messages
Kramer45042 2 years ago
dont really know tough.. The Beatles is full of mystery.. but,some of the info says that it's just for commercial purposes..
bebaslepas 2 years ago
Paul is still alive dude ;) John and George have died RIP both of them
Paul and Ringo are still making songs. And Paul and Ringo were both at this place to inforce the Beatles Rock Band :D
FunkyRoad96 2 years ago
Great performance!!!!
gulmorb 2 years ago
krusty is just a conspiracy believer
PedrosProductions 2 years ago
his hair is soo fluffy i wanna touch it lol
TryingUnique 2 years ago
hey man hes a legendary guy the beatles were the best..they did it all..everything since is Beatles -influenced as they were first/ etc
rudyxrudy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats not paul, its just replacement faul
worstkrusty 2 years ago
Yeah and you're just a replacement worstkrusty faul.
perfuzz 2 years ago
he didnt die in 66 are u high??
Andyistocoolforyou 2 years ago
He lost his life in 66 This is the replacement now that he has aged
Krazede 2 years ago
Bullshit
Andres21479 2 years ago
ok if u think that paul died in 66 then who was on top of apple corps studio playing the guitar ?? They would have told us that anyway
Andyistocoolforyou 2 years ago
dumb ass, he is still alive, and he was in a band called wings and now he's doing a tour
HarrisonGreene 2 years ago 2
No he didn't. The Beatles broke up in 69 or something and he's still goin. John and George are the ones that died. R.I.P.
AllCanadiaReject 2 years ago
John and George are dead? You gotta be kidding me! How did this happen? When? Who? How will we ever survive the loss? Imagine the worlds confusion when this gets out! What ever will we do?
Krazede 2 years ago
are you stupid?
LEBUZINHE 2 years ago
john died in 1980 and george dies in like 2000 or something
fuckuproductions 2 years ago
he died in 2001 because of cancer :(
rcrcool9 2 years ago
the video quality blows
ShuguProductions 2 years ago 4
Paul sem o resto dos The beatles é uma merda
caiosnoopy123456789 2 years ago
W! PAUL
MrEnricoGrillo 2 years ago
i goot a go to one of these
srocketdude 2 years ago
Fan is blowing his hair and he has not dyed it !
thats it? Stupid! :)
mortician54 2 years ago
wow what the bloody hell happend Paul use to own now he got a weird haircut(only in the 90's i suppose) AND LOST HIS AWESOME BRITHIS ACCENT THAT MADE HIM OWN
WarheadsTNT 2 years ago 2
Well, the Beatles were notorious for their ability to sing in just about any way needed for the song. As Paul got older he slowly lost this ability, he spent so long singing in an American blues fashion like most of his later work that it became his work. it's good to know he can still do the voice for hey jude :D
1tomh1 2 years ago
Unfortunately, as the Beatles are not immortal and immune to aging as we all wish they would be, they lose some of their vocal flair along the years, as previously stated, but it's good to know even then they sing just as good.
Astrosimi 2 years ago
woah! his voice almost sounds the same back when he was younger.
AzinBoyz17 2 years ago
good, but nothing compares to all of the beatles together =(
HeadbangingToJazz 2 years ago 2
2001, i believe. it was lung cancer.
HeadbangingToJazz 2 years ago
Where's John and George?
agbz 2 years ago
johns dead and George is dead john died of a gun shot and George died of cancer
sadnaruto523 2 years ago
wow it said 1993, Beatles broke up in 1970 kinda sad that you actually asked that
TundraticTurtle 2 years ago
WTF where is ringo?!
Marioman97 2 years ago
he lost his singing "accent"...
traindude95 2 years ago
It's not wriTER, It's writAH.
fabioproductions 2 years ago 3
Paul is one of my idols. :D
TimmyTheMunchlax 2 years ago
drummer fucked up the begining
Serabo 2 years ago
good... but just dosnt seem right
rhinovirus34 2 years ago
This just don't seem right to me.
steentompkins 2 years ago
Aww, Paul's saying Rider instead of Writer =-(
faceofpo 2 years ago
Great song... great vocal performance under windy conditions...but I really hate the 80-s 90-s use of "guitar Chorus" effects. Yuck. Check out Rusty Anderson playing it in recent live shows... that tone rocks.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
Ex-cel-lent!
Thanks for sharing.
I had no idea that he covered Paperback Writer post Wings.
desertskies 2 years ago
Is it really covering it if he originally wrote it? :P
GibsonSGrocka 2 years ago
and then God created Paul......
jonty9999 2 years ago 2
Poor video quality but the sound is great. Macca rules!
AlbatrosCN 2 years ago
Sweet.
psychkoala 2 years ago
this is wierder sounding like without everybody in the beatles and it sounds rock n rollish (more rock n rollish) like i dont know it just sounds very different
nightcrawler998 2 years ago 7
I find it funny how much more complicated that drum set looks compared to ringos
imOverWhere 2 years ago 7
ya seriously i think because thers a tamborine attached to it lol
nightcrawler998 2 years ago
'93's haircut
espiriguidiberto 2 years ago 4
you mean long in the backsides? that´s more like a 70´s thing
ElFrankus 2 years ago
i mean the whole thing...look for george harrison at the same year
espiriguidiberto 2 years ago
It was probably great live, the audio on here is shit
TomMagic92 2 years ago
This is nice. The things I don't like are the lead guitar tone and the harmonies.
That guitar sound is crappy! The harmonies sound like they're straining to reach the notes the way John and George did so easily. No one can match they're singing abilities on stage. Nobody! And they didn't have any newfangled stage monitors either.
ghramsey 2 years ago 3
What was the date of this concert?
DumbTheSlug 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
93, you fucking idiot
joshbergg 2 years ago
I meant exact date. I think I knew it was 1993 due to the title. Duh. No need. I know it now.
DumbTheSlug 2 years ago 4
lol
TomMagic92 2 years ago
good song!! viva paul!
exitoyfama 2 years ago
agreed not his best perfourmence
joshbergg 2 years ago
cant wait to see him at coachellla
michealalbin 2 years ago
findingusernamesucks your right its a bad cover. Of someone who should know it inside out.
mulefa 2 years ago
Paul McCartney, one of the biggest genuises in music, such a legend!
ulpen 2 years ago 6
ist und bleibt ein Genie!!!!!
kassandra224 2 years ago
Ja!!!!!!!!!!
milliatizowsky 2 years ago
ya du hast recht,
algeriamacgyver 2 years ago
this doesnt have the raw power and energy that the original has
westernrebel89 2 years ago 2
bravo..
:)
apapods 3 years ago
one of my favorite beatles songs
nhnative03220 3 years ago 5
this is great. absolutely great.
tubelogin1 3 years ago 7
at leat yoko ono isnt singing.....
converter877 3 years ago
lol
OroborusFMA 3 years ago
lol do people really she is a good singer?? sriously
converter877 3 years ago
She isn't a very good singer but a lot of her songs are good and she is a GREAT vocalist (meaning her screaming on the Plastic Ono Album and similar works) . . . you don't have to agree but her style is grand.
findingusernamesucks 2 years ago 5
One of the best songs he performed with the others back in the 60s. total mind blower!
erwintommy 3 years ago 2
buen video
12671362lennon 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
guh he's become such a show boater . . . this sounds like a cover; like he didn't even right it . . . I have to admit I did like the "ow" after the second "paperback writer" harmony but I mean c'mon he's totally forgotten who he was . . . can't cope without Lennon I guess haha
findingusernamesucks 3 years ago
its called having his voice change...
SuperLuigi192 3 years ago
it's not just that he got older he's doing different stuff that show his stylings have changed . . . If he it was just that his voice was tired and old I wouldn't have said anything . . .
findingusernamesucks 3 years ago
It's called playing your own song the way you want to play it. Finding...if they did it this way on the original record and 40 years later did it any other way, you would say it isn't right because of the way YOU are USED TO HEARING IT. I doubt if you thought of that though.
dotdadee 3 years ago 3
Wow wow don't tell me what I think. I never said I didn't still like the song but if it was recorded this way originally I wouldn't like the studio version as much. I just don't like his 90s pop vocal expression here.
p.s. Don't act as if you are smarter than someone (ex.: "I doubt if you thought of that though.") because people who are less kind than me will just use those words in some other post against you . . . in short you're just setting yourself up for someone to rip you a new one.
findingusernamesucks 3 years ago
Someone beat this guy bloody.
StolenBasses 3 years ago
hahaha what a jerk
hes much older now hes never gonna sound like he did on his 20's there is just no way
his energy has faded and the marijuana has worn away
Im just glad that paul is still doing what he loves and i really enjoy this song
28jul1821 3 years ago 4
I already stated that I wasn't talking about the age in his voice . . . but this is the last time Ima comment on this because none of you can see it so it's no use in discussing it.
findingusernamesucks 3 years ago 2
Well it's his to cover and charge to hear him do so ,so I guess he wins not you.
kooodeal 2 years ago
I don't think I said I win, I wouldn't do that,(though it's been a long time since I was at this page) so maybe I did say that to be difficult. However, it still sounds like a bad cover so I think both of us, Me and Macca, lose. Though, I don't ever remember competing, just sharing my opinion.
findingusernamesucks 2 years ago 2
ur a motherfucker who should go cry to his mommy because paul mccartney sounds like a cover.
stupidcrapcanyonlake 3 years ago
my mommys dead but it is true that this sounds like a bad cover
findingusernamesucks 3 years ago 3
It's amazing what shit people will believe these days.
Bellocks1 3 years ago
Yep, go Billy Shepherd. Orbandsceptre27, have a look at Shea stadium concert '65. Billy Shepherd's first and only live performance for the Beatles. Wonder where Paul was that they had to use the sub? Maybe on a bender somewhere. The fact that they got away with this must have given them the confidence to try it full time when Paul actually died in '67.
finder101 3 years ago
napintas latta kabsat
jet1216 3 years ago
He still sounds the same hes missing 3 ppl to play on this solo....oh yeah Ringo,John and George
Nacho2333 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul is dead along time, get over it - this is William, aka Billy.
orbandsceptre27 3 years ago
um no
pyettehead 3 years ago
that conspiracy theory is bogus... you can't replace a musical genius with a lookalike...
StefVonB 3 years ago 2