"they will be crying out for a public option" the problem Nancy is that it isn't optional it's mandatory, socialized health care and the taxes you pay are mandatory,
@ProPatriaBloodHonour No I am not mentally challenged, I assume you are a Thatcher freak so perhaps you are the one who is mentally challenged. As for you claiming the NRAdud the Texas Twat is better than in debate well he thinks that I am a nazi whih as I am jewish and a member of the Labour party seems to be a pretty stupid laim. He is a stupid boy. In fact he may even be you
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. Who? I don't know? It doesn't matter.
@NRAdude Well once again you are wrong because I the Goat am not a nationalist. If I saw the wold through the strictures of Britain I would not be expert on American music and films and politics. I am in no way a nazi you do your self no good by suggesting that I am.
@goatface1000 You specifically said that you wanted to place America under British rule all while wearing a goat suit. How is that not a nationalist statement?
@NRAdude I am not sure how 'Goat Suits' fitted into Nazi ideology. Did you not realise that I was taking the piss? Having a laugh? Making a joke. Like many of your kind you have no sense of irony and are totalling lacking in imagination. However if it makes you happy
@NRAdude And so the army marches through the heartlands of America . Man marches alongside Capybara, Crocodiles are the comrades of dogs cats and insects as we marh to the tune of the red flag, Men women & children flock to our cause and the red flag flies over many cities and towns. As we enter Fort Worth a loud cry goes 'Where is NRAdud?' A dog offers to track him down and together with a croc to loud cheers goes off to find the traitor. MADE YOU HAPPY?
@NRAdude I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? it wasn't an animal/inanimate object.
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
ISRAEL AND WORLD JEWRY CONDEMN NRADUD'S MOCKING OF THE HOLOCAUST,
Jews worldwide have joined voices to condemn the Texas Twat's mockery of Goatface's jewish heritage and those who died in the camps, The German goverment has called for the Fort Worth Flop to be censured, President Obama has reaffirmed his support for Goatface and has stated that that NRAdud is a bad AMerican and said that America is united behind the Briton whom president called a friend of America,
God bless the wise words of Ronald Reagan for he was the first in the new earliest of the strong forming America in the 1980's his words of wisdom he is right we need government but not to much.
A true American unlike the 3rd world mongrel garbage we have in office now. Reagan tried to make the US stronger and more prosperous whereas nobama tries to weakern us through socialism and collectivism.
At a press conference today held the Park Lane Hilton Goatface appealed for calm as the spamming row threatens to escalate into an international incident. Let bygones be bygones said the popular super hero his voice cracking with emotion. Let us debate these issues like grown ups. Let us go back to proving that NRAdude is wrong and ask those who spam to let others have the freedom of speech that both of our countries worship
@sgtisaloser Here's what you said on page 11 "He noticed because he SAW YOU spamming me (who else would?). Dude, when I logged on and saw his message, I logged off and hit the back key. Page 3, 4 and 5 are all marked as 'Spam'. As you do this, I'll call on others do spam you again. When you stop, I'll have them stop. This is how the game will be played until you learn to behave." Therefore you claimed I was spamming you, not that you "believed" which is what you're saying now.
@sgtisaloser Regardless of what you told them before, you made a concerted effort to get "friends" of yours to mark my comments as spam which is what you are accusing me of. Therefore, you've also proven yourself a hypocrite. The same thing you accuse Republicans of. I'm not the one who brought up the issue of spamming. That was you. Apparently you can't face the fact that there are many people who disagree with you other than myself. And now you've been lashing out in frustration
@NRAdude Nope...those folks were already 'spamming' you. No matter what you say, I made a concerted effort (twice) in asking them NOT to spam you.
Where am I a 'hypocrite' when I believed (and still believe) YOU had multiple personas, not 'multiple friends'?
I doubt there are that many folks that are SYSTEMATICALLY coming on voting me down, until you started getting frustrated, blithering and repeating your failed arguments.
But, hey, tell me when you want to get back to the issues.
@sgtisaloser Ah, but that's not what you said in the quote I posted below. You said "You spamming me" as if I necessarily did spam you. Now you've reduced it to "believe." You are a hypocrite since you are accusing me of spamming you when you are the one making a concerted effort to spam me by your own admission. Don't act as if you don't understand that. Prove I was frustrated. And how were the arguments "failed" since you still have yet to prove so without contradicting yourself?
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
@sgtisaloser And now you're making an un-backed claim that I'm somehow frustrated? How so? It's you that's making unsubstantiated claims, accusations, and Ad Hominem attacks.
@NRAdude You've made baseless claims about me allegedly being 'frustrated'; are you frustrated that I said you're frustrated after you claimed I was allegedly 'frustrated'?
How so?
You make plenty of ad hominem attacks against me and goat, but somehow you get angry when you think others do it to you?
How do you reconcile still another contradiction of yours?
By the way, when are you going to produce that alleged book on 'logic' you allegedly possess: name/author/edition please.
@sgtisaloser I justified it before but perhaps you forgot. You made the baseless and illogical claim that I was spamming you. Irrational thought in a debate like this suggests frustration correct?
@NRAdude You gave a verbatim quote, in quotation marks, about me allegedly backing away, being baseless, etc?
And somehow you PROVED it was 'baseless', etc?
Don't think so.
You hinted that you could read minds (knew what I was thinking) now you're just outright saying it ("You know very well...."). You sir are FASCINATING. Reading minds, in possession of magical (yet unnamed) logic books that are infallible, etc.
Hey, why don't you just run along and PROVE you can read minds.
@sgtisaloser The quote is on page 3 and everyone on this board can see that you're either ignorant or lying. And yes it is proof that your narrative before was that I necessarily "was spamming" you. Now it's that you "believe" having recognized your fallacy of the false cause. How is that implying that I can read minds and what's to say that yours could not be read in that instance?
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argument in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
@sgtisaloser And more frustration coming out of you. You know very well I was referring to your comments. It was irrational considering I'm not the only one viewing this video or liking it.Frustratiom
@NRAdude "And more frustration coming out of you."
This is what started all the talk of 'frustration'. It's baseless, per your words today, if you can't prove it. Can you PROVE I'm 'frustrated', or is this just your BELIEF?
If you can PROVE it, you're going to have to do so, otherwise it's baseless ad hominem attack.
@sgtisaloser Yes it was baseless. You made accusations which, by your own admission now, you had no proof of. You didn't say "believe" before as evidence by the quote I made of you on page 3. No Ad Hominem means that I'm attackng you not your argument. I stated your argument was pure emotion and not reason let alone lacking any evidence and thus you were acting out of frustration.
@NRAdude "I already posted it. You didn't see it."
You said you posted it in 'another video', not this one. How am I supposed to know WHERE you allegedly posted it then WHEN you said it?
Of course, that's silly. I'll ask again: please post the name/author/edition of this magical logic book that, although written/edited/published by humans, is somehow free of error.
You can't because the only rational reason is it doesn't exist. YOU said all things human are fallible. Thus ANY book is.
@sgtisaloser No I didn't. I posted it on this one. Where did I ever say it was on "another video?" That's either a lie or a Logical Fallacy of the Straw Man.
@NRAdude Argumentative 'logic' (persuasive written or verbal argument) is NOT science. If you think it is, please prove it.
"Science'" affects all things in the universe, both animate and inanimate. Last I heard, argumentative logic is something ONLY humans engage in; thus, only HUMANS created the rules regarding it, and thus they are fallible.
Good you got back to the argument we're having. Until you PROVE argumentative logic is infallible, it will remain fallible. Give the book's name.
@sgtisaloser Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. You're continuing to avoid the question on purpose (frustration?). Even if we took your assumption as true, Gallieo argued with the Aristotelians in the middle ages about whether the sun revolved around the Earth or vice versa. Hence it follows that Science requires argument and a logical proof and thus science is logic. Hence you've run into another contradiction in your argument.
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
@sgtisaloser And again your argument against logic is self-contradictory since you're assuming logic is infallible by using it to try and prove that logic is infallible. And as for your argument about Republicans being hypocrites and "begging" is also contradictory for reasons already proved. Not to mention your epic blunder by saying a FOIA request for a congressional proceeding.
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
@sgtisaloser I never said it wasn't used by humans, I asked who made it. And so far, you've assumed that humans have made it when that is the point you're trying to prove. So once again who made it? And I already have proven otherwise by showing that your argument leads to a contradiction. Try again.
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
@NRAdude I personally find it very offensive to be called a nazi, however as your continued accusation just goes to illustrate your ignorance of politics and history I will let the supposes insult go. My rabbinacal grandfather however may be in heaven waiting for you and may be putting the knife in already.
@sgtisaloser He is very silly. He claims to think that the British Labour Party is the same as the Nazi party. This is the party that helped America in Iraq & Afghanistan. That is what I find so bizzare about these guys the total nonsense they spout and seem to believe. They are not like British conservatives.
@NRAdude He would not call me that because unlike you he knew what it meant and had first hand experience of the horrors inflicted by the Nazis. He was Polish and emigrated first to America and then later to England. He left 2 brothers and a sister behid in Poland and they were never seen again. So even though we did not agree on politics (He was a strong conservative) he would have had no time for your silly accusations and name calling. So grow up and argue like an adult.
@NRAdude You defy all logic, You are a mean spirited nasty little boy, He never accused me of being a nazi. He would have hated you and your kind, One thing we did agree on was a total opposition to all racsim,
@goatface1000 Of course he wouldn't have. But that's before he didn't know his grandson would turn out a National Socialist now did he? Funny how you talk of Israel when it's us Conservatives who stand up for Israel unlike you National Socialist blokes.
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
@sgtisaloser The boy is isstill marking you aup as spam then. Really sad and perhaps gives an idea of what he thinks about freedom of speech. Only for those who say what he wants to hear.
Reviewed your comments. You are even more ignorant than this goatface1000. You should consider attempting to improve you education and get off the dole. I am actually embarrassed for you.
@goatface1000 Oh here we go again.. More irrational accusations out of frustration that their arguments not only are contradictory but are also unpopular on a Conservative video. Please keep making assumptions about who all is disagreeing with you. It's quite hilarious
@NRAdude You are so riresome, I will ask you this question again which you have never answered. When have I preached German nationalism, asked for lebensruam for the German people claimed that jews were inferior and should be made to wear a yellow star before being shippped to ghettos and the to camps to be exterminated? When have I called for gypsies freemason and the mentally subnormal to be dealt with in the same way? The answer is you can't so how can I be a nazi?
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. so, WHO invented persuasive argument? don't know...some human.
@sgtisaloser You say you don't know and yet you say you know it was "some human?"Another contradiction out of you. Which is it? And once again, I'm not asking for who uses it, I'm asking who made it. Stop avoiding the question.
@NRAdude I simply asked whoever started spamming you to:
1) stop spamming you (had to ask twice);
2) resume spamming you, since I (and they?) believed you started spamming me again.
I ask them now to cease/desist spamming you as long as you're (or whoever it is) isn't spamming me.
I think I BENEFIT having your statements up when mine stay up...because I'm correct. My statements standing alone don't have the same...shall we say 'panache'...if yours aren't up there as a comparison.
@NRAdudo Nobody else is arguing with me but you. That's okay...I've seen you spamming goatface and others when you were behaving with me and stayed quiet.
You've got issues YOU need to work on, kid. But, yeah, you ever gonna post that book in this videos respons area? The one that is magically infallible? LOL
NRAdude Nobody else is arguing with me but you. That's okay...I've seen you spamming goatface and others when you were behaving with me and stayed quiet.
You've got issues YOU need to work on, kid. But, yeah, you ever gonna post that book in this videos respons area? The one that is magically infallible? LOL
NRADUD DISCOVERED FLAGGING RIVALS COMMENTS AS SPAM.
Well what do know? The Texas twat has been caught flagging the comments of the great American sgtisaloser as spam. Goatface is to appear on American television (Not Fox News) to denounce the Fort Worth Fool as a spoilt little boy who because he is being taken apart by sgtisaloser is unable to bear seeing the comments that are slicing apart his arguements like a surgeon operating on a patient. Asked for a quote the boy ran away
@NRAdude It is known that you were marking his comments as spam. ANd don;t call me a National Socialst. I am not a nationalist and certainly not a Nazi. I thought we had cleared that fantasy of yours up. And answer my questions.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@goatface1000 Really? How is it that you "know" who was marking his comments as spam? I would like to know as I don't know who it was. What fantasy? You mean like your national socialist rants about taking over America?
@NRAdude I hate to use the word but 'Logic' would suggest that it is you who has been spamming sgtisaloser. You are the only one who is arguing with him and he is taking you apart with clinical precision. So who else would be motivated to do this?
@goatface1000 How would he be taking me apart when he has yet to come up with a valid argument? How many people viewed this video? How many viewed this video and "liked" it? You're assuming that you have to be arguing/commenting on this board in order to mark someone as spam or thumb them down. You're also assuming that you have to commment/argue in order to be motivated enough to spam somone. You just made the Logical Fallacy of the False Cause. Wrong side of the road again mate.
@NRAdude And so you equate the British Labour party as being the same as Hitler & the Nazi's? You must be barking mad. You need to restrained in a straight jacket and placed in a padded cell for your own protection. You speak more nonsense than any human being in the history of humanity. You make Ann Coulter look logical and not prejudiced
@NRAdude Also I forgot to add, Churchill was not by the standards of his day on the right of the Conservative party. Indeed he was for some time a member of the LIBERAL party. You really should check your facts. What is it like to be weak both physically and intellectually? A pathetic creep who never goes out because he has no friends and just sits in fromt of a screen like a geek. Overweight with a goatee beard the epitome of trailer trash. Beaten by men better than you.
@NRAdude LOL...you've seen my responses, you've just erased them. That's okay, since your responses have gotten erased or spammed too.
This game will continue until you learn to behave. It's really that easy. Now, if you're willing to be adult, I'll ask the folks once again (last time it took me twice) to stop spamming/voting you down.
@sgtisaloser No I haven't seen your responses save this one. And once again, I'm not spamming you nor have I ever done so. You have yet to provide proof let alone any evidence that I've done so. I honestly don't care who spams my posts since your contradictory arguments will be here to amuse many people to come. I do, however, find it funny that you're the one admitting to spamming me and yet you accuse others of doing so to you. Typical liberal
@NRAdude What you claim to have seen is meaningless. I responded, and even talked about you in the third person as well (to goatface). Most you've managed to 'spam' in a couple of hours.
@sgtisaloser Meaningless? Didn't you say that you knew (somehow) that I saw it? Therefore if you want to call what you say meaningless, I'm in perfect agreement with you. :)
@sgtisaloser Yes you do unless you want to claim you believe something without proof. And I don't know who you're talking about "spamming" me since I still see my comments up :)
@NRAdude I never 'admitted' to spamming you; I said others are. I even asked the others NOT to spam you because your statements make mine look even better.
@sgtisaloser No he is still in the playground he is only a boy perhaps when he grows up he will learn some sense and also perhaps gain some humanity and compassion,
@goatface1000 LOL...he's sad and funny at the same time. Clearly, there are PLENTY of people here that want to silence him. He'll have to stop with his games.
@NRAdude Now when did I say that after conquering America that I intended to make Jews wear a yellow star and herd them into ghettos prior to transporting them to concentration camps where they would be worked to death or gassed if they were too weak to work? When did I say that I was going to do the same with gypsies, freemasons & the mentally subnormal. Going from memory I think I said that I was going to nationalise Disney, turn the Yankee Satadium into a cricket ground
@NRAdude and outlaw American beer.I also said that I lead an army of humans animals including as I remember crocodiles. But you know I was only joking having a laugh, I never had any have no intention of intention of leading an invasion of the USA. I may have an eccentric sense of humour but I am not (Unlike you) delusional. I was as we say in Britain 'Taking the piss' Which means to ridicule or to take unfair advantage.
@NRAdude Are you suggesting that it may be Caspercee? Well I have to say that I doubt it. Casper and I do not agree on very much but at least he does not block people who disagree with him from his page and I have never known him to be untruthful unlike you who would not know the truth if it hit you arounf the head with a fence post. So whilst I think Casper is wrong on many counts I do not think he would behave in such a way. It is also very childish to do this whch again points to you
@goatface1000 Killer is, NRA isn't a DUMB guy...he's probably fairly intelligence. He takes that intelligence, however, and uses it farily idiotically.
He's so predictable, too. When he can't outwit, he lies; when he's outed for lying, he and his likely multiple personalities 'spam' folks.
@sgtisaloser Prove where I lied and what multiple personalities I allegedly have. Time to put up or shut up. If you can't prove it then you're making another baseless accusation out of frustration.
@NRAdude Prove I allegedly contradicted myself. Time to put up or shut up. If you can't prove it then you're making another baseless accusation out of impotent frustration.
Oh yeah, please also prove you have that alleged book on logic. You know, the one that has all the answers, yet you can't seem to produce.
Please provide the books name/author/edition. Time to 'put up or shut up'. LOL
@NRAdude Once again baby boy you display your ignorance of my great country and also you total stupidity. Churchill lost the 1945 election and Labour instituted the Welfare State which included the National Health Service (NHS) When the Conservatives won the next election they conducted a study of the NHS and elected to continue with it. We still it today even Thatcher did not dare to get rid of it. I have never heard of Churchill calling the NHS 'Gestapo' He may have
@goatface1000 He did say it. Go look it up. Churchill was opposed to your national healthcare program from the get-go. Oh and here we go with "Churchill was a liberal since we like to think of him as one" argument.. Just like Reagan was a democrat before he was a Republican, Churchill was a Conservative after he recognized the liberal party for what it was. You either witheld this information when you posted your response or you were ignorant of your own country's history. Try again mate
@NRAdude Once agaon you are wrong, he was a cConservative then Liberal the once again Conservative. Now I bow to nobody in my admiration for Churchill. He acted as the catalyst for our victory in WW2 however for miost of his life he was a total screw up and only during the war did he flourish.
@NRAdude I have looked again and found the actual quote you are alluding to it is Churchill even went as far as to stay that if Labour were elected it would need to "fall back on some kind of Gestapo" to implement its policies.Not quite what you said, As I said before when Churchill regained the premiership he made no attempt to get rid of the NHS and indeed today our Conservative PM extols it'svirtues. You really talk a load of garbage. People like sgtisaloser and myslef
@goatface1000 "once agaon?" Please learn how to spell mate. And no he was a liberal starting in 1904 and became a Conservative again in the 1920s. Once again you don't know your history mate. And what do you mean not what I said? That is what I said. Are you trying to twist my words now? I could really care less what you and sgt think however what is at stake is what is pure and simple. Wrong side of the road still jolly ol boy?
@sgtisaloser If you aren't going to provide proof for my supposed "personas" then why should I provide proof for you being a liberal? You can't have it both ways son
@NRAdude Churchill became premier in the second post WW2 election and made no attempt to closethe NHS. He may not have liked it but he still recognised that the people wanted it, You do not know the history of America let alone that of Britain.
@NRAdude done so but I doubt if this fanatical anti nazi would have cheapened himself to say that. What possible connection is there between the NHS & the Gestapo. Also Atlee was the deputy prime minister in the war and had Churchill's respect.You need to sort yourself out. You are heading for a sausage whipping. I have heard it said that you are a traitor to the uSA.
@NRAdude Oh yeah, PROVE I allegedly 'contradicted' myself in all my responses.
I proved that YOU contradicted yourself when you said on page 2/1 hour ago (as of my typing this) that "...I haven't tried to prove anything..." when you JUST said 36 minutes ago (as of this writing) that allegedly , "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
Wow, you made that easy for me. You're getting more frustrated and desperate with each response.
@NRAdude AND DON'T CALL ME A NAZI. It is an insult to the those who died in the holocaust. Those who you believe are now in hell. You are a really strange boy.
@NRAdude said: "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
I thought you just said you weren't trying to prove anything just making assumptions. Yet you claim here (and earlier) that you've proven something. Contradiction.
" Answer the question. " I have answered the question. Just because you don't like my answer, or find it inconvenient to your position doesn't mean it hasn't been answered.
@NRAdude Oh yeah, PROVE I allegedly 'contradicted' myself in all my responses.
I proved that YOU contradicted yourself when you said on page 2/1 hour ago (as of my typing this) that "...I haven't tried to prove anything..." when you JUST said 36 minutes ago (as of this writing) that allegedly , "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
Wow, you made that easy for me. You're getting more frustrated and desperate with each response.
@NRAdude "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
I thought you just said you weren't trying to prove anything just making assumptions. Yet you claim here (and earlier) that you've proven something. Contradiction.
" Answer the question. " I have answered the question. Just because you don't like my answer, or find it inconvenient to your position doesn't mean it hasn't been answered.
@NRAdude "Oh and by the way this statement of yours is invalid if one were to assume that logic were fallible." And, oh, by the way, THIS and ALL statements by you are invalid since logic (as you use it - persuasive written/verbal argument) is only found in humans/used by humans/ rules made by humans and thus fallible.
@NRAdude " As for autmobiles, they are engines correct? Do you think that all engines were created by humans?"
Doesn't matter. I said 'automobiles', not 'engines'.
By your seemingly NEW standards, nothing is 'human made'. I mean, my source on T. Roosevelt who wrote a book saying he was no 'conservative' used paper. Paper comes from trees. Trees have been on the planet billions of years before humans.
So, per your new logic, that means EVERYTHING is infallible.
@NRAdude " As for autmobiles, they are engines correct? Do you think that all engines were created by humans?"
Doesn't matter. I said 'automobiles', not 'engines'.
By your seemingly NEW standards, nothing is 'human made'. I mean, my source on T. Roosevelt who wrote a book saying he was no 'conservative' used paper. Paper comes from trees. Trees have been on the planet billions of years before humans.
So, per your new logic, that means EVERYTHING is infallible.
AWESOME. It really contrasts the difference between the paths of liberty and slavery. Too bad we don't have a deliverer of the message (Reagan) to contrast the intentions of the Socialists in the video.
@NRAdude "I continue to oppose the so-called stimulus package because it has been a failure. It has failed at job creation....
"It is my obligation as a member of Congress to ensure stimulus dollars are spent on the most worthy projects. I did just that when I supported applications for the TIGER grant program."
Rep Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota , MinnPost response, Oct 18, 2010.
Ouch. Wonder if Cantor had the balls to be so contradictory, or if he wussed out and stayed quiet?
@sgtisaloser And who runs the Minnesota post? Humans? Therefore, Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Authority. Even if we assume that this "source" of yours is true, I do not see any begging in this quote. And if you're saying that she lied, then she didn't beg since she was not sincere hence you continue to contradict yourself. Quite funny. And I thought you said logic was fallible? Which means this argument of yours is fallible since it attempts to use logic
@NRAdude "And I thought you said logic was fallible?"
Quote me where I said that. You can't. I said 'logic as YOU use it (persuasive written or verbal argument) is fallible, since only humans engage in persuasive written and verbal arguments.'
YOU said humans are fallible, so that means 'logical fallacies', which are ONLY done by humas, are, by definition, fallible.
Try and try to argue your point, you'll fail each time.
By the way, the 'source' was Michele Bachmann herself.
@sgtisaloser Here's where you said it "logic as YOU use it (persuasive written or verbal argument) is fallible, since only humans engage in persuasive written and verbal arguments." Regardless of whether I use it or not, it's still logic correct? Therefore, you're saying that logic is fallible. You have just contradicted all of your arguments thus far. Again.
@NRAdude Not 'regardless of whether' you use it or not. You ARE arguing about 'logical fallacies' as though they are cure alls when you've painted yourself in a corner.
It's a FACT that only humans are known to use 'logical fallacies' since only humans are known to engage in 'persuasive written and verbal arguments'.
YOU said that humans are fallible.
Therefore, anything related to 'persuasive written and verbal arguments' is human and thus fallible.
"they will be crying out for a public option" the problem Nancy is that it isn't optional it's mandatory, socialized health care and the taxes you pay are mandatory,
santacruzsevilla777 17 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron was a great man. A man amoung men. He, like Margaret, understood HONOUR!
ProPatriaBloodHonour 18 hours ago
@ProPatriaBloodHonour No I am not mentally challenged, I assume you are a Thatcher freak so perhaps you are the one who is mentally challenged. As for you claiming the NRAdud the Texas Twat is better than in debate well he thinks that I am a nazi whih as I am jewish and a member of the Labour party seems to be a pretty stupid laim. He is a stupid boy. In fact he may even be you
goatface1000 33 minutes ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. Who? I don't know? It doesn't matter.
sgtisaloser 21 hours ago
Comment removed
sgtisaloser 21 hours ago
STOP THE SPAMMING
goatface1000 1 day ago
@NRAdude Well once again you are wrong because I the Goat am not a nationalist. If I saw the wold through the strictures of Britain I would not be expert on American music and films and politics. I am in no way a nazi you do your self no good by suggesting that I am.
goatface1000 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 You specifically said that you wanted to place America under British rule all while wearing a goat suit. How is that not a nationalist statement?
NRAdude 15 hours ago
@NRAdude I am not sure how 'Goat Suits' fitted into Nazi ideology. Did you not realise that I was taking the piss? Having a laugh? Making a joke. Like many of your kind you have no sense of irony and are totalling lacking in imagination. However if it makes you happy
goatface1000 27 minutes ago
@NRAdude And so the army marches through the heartlands of America . Man marches alongside Capybara, Crocodiles are the comrades of dogs cats and insects as we marh to the tune of the red flag, Men women & children flock to our cause and the red flag flies over many cities and towns. As we enter Fort Worth a loud cry goes 'Where is NRAdud?' A dog offers to track him down and together with a croc to loud cheers goes off to find the traitor. MADE YOU HAPPY?
goatface1000 18 minutes ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? it wasn't an animal/inanimate object.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
Comment removed
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
ISRAEL AND WORLD JEWRY CONDEMN NRADUD'S MOCKING OF THE HOLOCAUST,
Jews worldwide have joined voices to condemn the Texas Twat's mockery of Goatface's jewish heritage and those who died in the camps, The German goverment has called for the Fort Worth Flop to be censured, President Obama has reaffirmed his support for Goatface and has stated that that NRAdud is a bad AMerican and said that America is united behind the Briton whom president called a friend of America,
goatface1000 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need Ronald Reagan again.
We need conservatism again.
We need A Change on the right direction.
We need a President with convictions.
We need a change to the RIGHT direction, not the left.
mylivingwater 2 days ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
God bless the wise words of Ronald Reagan for he was the first in the new earliest of the strong forming America in the 1980's his words of wisdom he is right we need government but not to much.
Selfinator96 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A true American unlike the 3rd world mongrel garbage we have in office now. Reagan tried to make the US stronger and more prosperous whereas nobama tries to weakern us through socialism and collectivism.
xerakis 2 days ago
GOATFACE CALLS FOR THE SPAMMING TO CEASE.
At a press conference today held the Park Lane Hilton Goatface appealed for calm as the spamming row threatens to escalate into an international incident. Let bygones be bygones said the popular super hero his voice cracking with emotion. Let us debate these issues like grown ups. Let us go back to proving that NRAdude is wrong and ask those who spam to let others have the freedom of speech that both of our countries worship
goatface1000 3 days ago
@goatface1000 LOL...let's hope ALL folks agree to that.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser Yes, off to the pub now thirsty and a new beer in this week
goatface1000 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser Here's what you said on page 11 "He noticed because he SAW YOU spamming me (who else would?). Dude, when I logged on and saw his message, I logged off and hit the back key. Page 3, 4 and 5 are all marked as 'Spam'. As you do this, I'll call on others do spam you again. When you stop, I'll have them stop. This is how the game will be played until you learn to behave." Therefore you claimed I was spamming you, not that you "believed" which is what you're saying now.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser Regardless of what you told them before, you made a concerted effort to get "friends" of yours to mark my comments as spam which is what you are accusing me of. Therefore, you've also proven yourself a hypocrite. The same thing you accuse Republicans of. I'm not the one who brought up the issue of spamming. That was you. Apparently you can't face the fact that there are many people who disagree with you other than myself. And now you've been lashing out in frustration
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude Nope...those folks were already 'spamming' you. No matter what you say, I made a concerted effort (twice) in asking them NOT to spam you.
Where am I a 'hypocrite' when I believed (and still believe) YOU had multiple personas, not 'multiple friends'?
I doubt there are that many folks that are SYSTEMATICALLY coming on voting me down, until you started getting frustrated, blithering and repeating your failed arguments.
But, hey, tell me when you want to get back to the issues.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser Ah, but that's not what you said in the quote I posted below. You said "You spamming me" as if I necessarily did spam you. Now you've reduced it to "believe." You are a hypocrite since you are accusing me of spamming you when you are the one making a concerted effort to spam me by your own admission. Don't act as if you don't understand that. Prove I was frustrated. And how were the arguments "failed" since you still have yet to prove so without contradicting yourself?
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude Ah, but I've often said I 'believe' you were spamming me; still do.
I've said 'believe' often enough, and you or anyone else can go back and see as such.
Prove I was 'frustrated'.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
@sgtisaloser And now you're making an un-backed claim that I'm somehow frustrated? How so? It's you that's making unsubstantiated claims, accusations, and Ad Hominem attacks.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude You've made baseless claims about me allegedly being 'frustrated'; are you frustrated that I said you're frustrated after you claimed I was allegedly 'frustrated'?
How so?
You make plenty of ad hominem attacks against me and goat, but somehow you get angry when you think others do it to you?
How do you reconcile still another contradiction of yours?
By the way, when are you going to produce that alleged book on 'logic' you allegedly possess: name/author/edition please.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser I justified it before but perhaps you forgot. You made the baseless and illogical claim that I was spamming you. Irrational thought in a debate like this suggests frustration correct?
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude No, I didn't 'forget' anything; I didn't see it (likely wasn't there).
Prove I made 'baseless and illogical claims' with verbatim quotes.
Books's name/author/edition please.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser I just gave the verbatim quote did I not? And likely wasn't there? What's the probability distribution?
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude You gave a verbatim quote, in quotation marks, about me allegedly backing away, being baseless, etc?
And somehow you PROVED it was 'baseless', etc?
Don't think so.
You hinted that you could read minds (knew what I was thinking) now you're just outright saying it ("You know very well...."). You sir are FASCINATING. Reading minds, in possession of magical (yet unnamed) logic books that are infallible, etc.
Hey, why don't you just run along and PROVE you can read minds.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser The quote is on page 3 and everyone on this board can see that you're either ignorant or lying. And yes it is proof that your narrative before was that I necessarily "was spamming" you. Now it's that you "believe" having recognized your fallacy of the false cause. How is that implying that I can read minds and what's to say that yours could not be read in that instance?
NRAdude 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 15 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argument in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 4 hours ago
@NRAdude Prove my thoughts were 'irrational' or that you know what I'm 'thinking'.
"Irrational thought in a debate like this suggests frustration correct?"
That why you were frustrated? LOL
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser And more frustration coming out of you. You know very well I was referring to your comments. It was irrational considering I'm not the only one viewing this video or liking it.Frustratiom
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude "And more frustration coming out of you."
This is what started all the talk of 'frustration'. It's baseless, per your words today, if you can't prove it. Can you PROVE I'm 'frustrated', or is this just your BELIEF?
If you can PROVE it, you're going to have to do so, otherwise it's baseless ad hominem attack.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser Yes it was baseless. You made accusations which, by your own admission now, you had no proof of. You didn't say "believe" before as evidence by the quote I made of you on page 3. No Ad Hominem means that I'm attackng you not your argument. I stated your argument was pure emotion and not reason let alone lacking any evidence and thus you were acting out of frustration.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude Why don't you be a sport and post that alleged book on logic here in this video thread: name/author/edition.
We'll see what it says, and how it can be trusted to be true like you say.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser I already posted it. You didn't see it.
NRAdude 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "I already posted it. You didn't see it."
You said you posted it in 'another video', not this one. How am I supposed to know WHERE you allegedly posted it then WHEN you said it?
Of course, that's silly. I'll ask again: please post the name/author/edition of this magical logic book that, although written/edited/published by humans, is somehow free of error.
You can't because the only rational reason is it doesn't exist. YOU said all things human are fallible. Thus ANY book is.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser No I didn't. I posted it on this one. Where did I ever say it was on "another video?" That's either a lie or a Logical Fallacy of the Straw Man.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser No, you are assuming there are no other reasons. Big difference. Hence the logical fallacy of the False Cause.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser And even if I did repost it, you continue to deny all laws of logic (and hence science) so how would this book change your mind?
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude Argumentative 'logic' (persuasive written or verbal argument) is NOT science. If you think it is, please prove it.
"Science'" affects all things in the universe, both animate and inanimate. Last I heard, argumentative logic is something ONLY humans engage in; thus, only HUMANS created the rules regarding it, and thus they are fallible.
Good you got back to the argument we're having. Until you PROVE argumentative logic is infallible, it will remain fallible. Give the book's name.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. You're continuing to avoid the question on purpose (frustration?). Even if we took your assumption as true, Gallieo argued with the Aristotelians in the middle ages about whether the sun revolved around the Earth or vice versa. Hence it follows that Science requires argument and a logical proof and thus science is logic. Hence you've run into another contradiction in your argument.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
HOW he argued is strictly human.
gallileo argued PHYSICAL LAW, thus fallible
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
HOW he argued is strictly human.
gallileo argued PHYSICAL LAW, thus fallible
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser And again your argument against logic is self-contradictory since you're assuming logic is infallible by using it to try and prove that logic is infallible. And as for your argument about Republicans being hypocrites and "begging" is also contradictory for reasons already proved. Not to mention your epic blunder by saying a FOIA request for a congressional proceeding.
NRAdude 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
HOW he argued is strictly human.
gallileo argued PHYSICAL LAW, thus fallible
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser I never said it wasn't used by humans, I asked who made it. And so far, you've assumed that humans have made it when that is the point you're trying to prove. So once again who made it? And I already have proven otherwise by showing that your argument leads to a contradiction. Try again.
NRAdude 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
So, once again: a HUMAN 'invented' logic in the way YOU'RE using it (persuasive argumentn in written or verbal form).
Who? Don't know. Who created the firecracker? Don't know, some human. Same with persuasive written/verbal argument.
You can ask the same question a million times, but you'll get the same answer.
sgtisaloser 17 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
@goatface1000 GOATFACE THINKS HE HAS PRESS CONFERENCES!
According to the BBC, Goatface is to be forced into an insane asylum along with the other National Socialists in Britain.
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude I personally find it very offensive to be called a nazi, however as your continued accusation just goes to illustrate your ignorance of politics and history I will let the supposes insult go. My rabbinacal grandfather however may be in heaven waiting for you and may be putting the knife in already.
goatface1000 2 days ago
@goatface1000 I'd have to believe that him repeatedly calling you are 'nazi' is baseless. Per his definition, he's 'frustrated'.
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser He is very silly. He claims to think that the British Labour Party is the same as the Nazi party. This is the party that helped America in Iraq & Afghanistan. That is what I find so bizzare about these guys the total nonsense they spout and seem to believe. They are not like British conservatives.
goatface1000 2 days ago
@goatface1000 Well he would be more disappointed that his grandson would be a National Socialist to begin with now wouldn't he?
NRAdude 2 days ago
@NRAdude He would not call me that because unlike you he knew what it meant and had first hand experience of the horrors inflicted by the Nazis. He was Polish and emigrated first to America and then later to England. He left 2 brothers and a sister behid in Poland and they were never seen again. So even though we did not agree on politics (He was a strong conservative) he would have had no time for your silly accusations and name calling. So grow up and argue like an adult.
goatface1000 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 So he barely escaped the National Socialist party only to see his grandson turn into a socialist? How would he not condemn you?
NRAdude 1 day ago
@NRAdude You defy all logic, You are a mean spirited nasty little boy, He never accused me of being a nazi. He would have hated you and your kind, One thing we did agree on was a total opposition to all racsim,
goatface1000 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 Of course he wouldn't have. But that's before he didn't know his grandson would turn out a National Socialist now did he? Funny how you talk of Israel when it's us Conservatives who stand up for Israel unlike you National Socialist blokes.
NRAdude 1 day ago
@NRAdude "Once again, I did not ask who uses logic, I asked who made it. "
Once again, I answered: 'logic' as YOU ARE USING IT HERE, (persuasive argument in written or verbal form) was invented by 'some human'. who? i don't know. do you? for SURE no other animal created it, nor did any inanimate object.
WHAT he argued,earth revolves around the sun, is physical science which affects everything on earth.
HOW he argued is strictly human.
gallileo argued PHYSICAL LAW, thus fallible
sgtisaloser 2 days ago
@sgtisaloser The boy is isstill marking you aup as spam then. Really sad and perhaps gives an idea of what he thinks about freedom of speech. Only for those who say what he wants to hear.
goatface1000 1 day ago
@goatface1000 I know, that's why I keep repeating my statements he erases. I'll see how long he keeps at that particular game.
What it shows is he knows he's wrong. That makes him miserable.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
@sgtisaloser Yes keep it up. I will have to start typing with the light on I have noticed several spelling mistakes the boy will pick me up.
goatface1000 23 hours ago
@goatface1000 Typos happen. He's called me out once or twice, and then told him about HIS typos.
I noticed before logging in he erased the statements again, so I'll just keep posting them...particularly one of them. LOL
sgtisaloser 21 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser
Reviewed your comments. You are even more ignorant than this goatface1000. You should consider attempting to improve you education and get off the dole. I am actually embarrassed for you.
ProPatriaBloodHonour 5 hours ago
Comment removed
sgtisaloser 21 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000
Reviewed some of the dialogue here. NRAdude seems to better you in debate. Are you mentally challenged?
ProPatriaBloodHonour 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 Oh here we go again.. More irrational accusations out of frustration that their arguments not only are contradictory but are also unpopular on a Conservative video. Please keep making assumptions about who all is disagreeing with you. It's quite hilarious
NRAdude 15 hours ago
@NRAdude You are so riresome, I will ask you this question again which you have never answered. When have I preached German nationalism, asked for lebensruam for the German people claimed that jews were inferior and should be made to wear a yellow star before being shippped to ghettos and the to camps to be exterminated? When have I called for gypsies freemason and the mentally subnormal to be dealt with in the same way? The answer is you can't so how can I be a nazi?
goatface1000 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 I didn't say German nationalism now did I? I said National Socialism. Wrong side of the road again mate.
NRAdude 1 day ago
@NRAdude I'm not 'assuming' anyting; it is a FACT that persuasive argument in written or verbal form is ONLY found in humans. so, WHO invented persuasive argument? don't know...some human.
sgtisaloser 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser You say you don't know and yet you say you know it was "some human?"Another contradiction out of you. Which is it? And once again, I'm not asking for who uses it, I'm asking who made it. Stop avoiding the question.
NRAdude 1 day ago
and what about the patriot act?
GetThisThingCrunk 3 days ago
But I also asked them NOT to spam you.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser But you also asked them TO spam me. Now you've contradicted yourself again.
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude I simply asked whoever started spamming you to:
1) stop spamming you (had to ask twice);
2) resume spamming you, since I (and they?) believed you started spamming me again.
I ask them now to cease/desist spamming you as long as you're (or whoever it is) isn't spamming me.
I think I BENEFIT having your statements up when mine stay up...because I'm correct. My statements standing alone don't have the same...shall we say 'panache'...if yours aren't up there as a comparison.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
We'll see if my statements are still up.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser Why are you saying this when I can't guarantee some else doesn't spam you?
NRAdude 3 days ago
Damn...back later
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser According to your logic, you're trying to hack youtube hahahaha
NRAdude 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "According to your logic, you're trying to hack youtube hahahaha"
What?
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
Something is happening to youtube, eh?
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
Gotta go.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a great freedom fighter president Reagan was. Loved the land we lead. A leader's leader.
RETSZTIRF 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdudo Nobody else is arguing with me but you. That's okay...I've seen you spamming goatface and others when you were behaving with me and stayed quiet.
You've got issues YOU need to work on, kid. But, yeah, you ever gonna post that book in this videos respons area? The one that is magically infallible? LOL
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NRAdude Nobody else is arguing with me but you. That's okay...I've seen you spamming goatface and others when you were behaving with me and stayed quiet.
You've got issues YOU need to work on, kid. But, yeah, you ever gonna post that book in this videos respons area? The one that is magically infallible? LOL
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
NRADUD DISCOVERED FLAGGING RIVALS COMMENTS AS SPAM.
Well what do know? The Texas twat has been caught flagging the comments of the great American sgtisaloser as spam. Goatface is to appear on American television (Not Fox News) to denounce the Fort Worth Fool as a spoilt little boy who because he is being taken apart by sgtisaloser is unable to bear seeing the comments that are slicing apart his arguements like a surgeon operating on a patient. Asked for a quote the boy ran away
goatface1000 1 week ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@goatface1000 Where did you come up with this bag of rubbish mate? I thought you were better than that even though you are a national socialist.
NRAdude 1 week ago
@NRAdude It is known that you were marking his comments as spam. ANd don;t call me a National Socialst. I am not a nationalist and certainly not a Nazi. I thought we had cleared that fantasy of yours up. And answer my questions.
goatface1000 1 week ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@goatface1000 Really? How is it that you "know" who was marking his comments as spam? I would like to know as I don't know who it was. What fantasy? You mean like your national socialist rants about taking over America?
NRAdude 1 week ago
@NRAdude I hate to use the word but 'Logic' would suggest that it is you who has been spamming sgtisaloser. You are the only one who is arguing with him and he is taking you apart with clinical precision. So who else would be motivated to do this?
goatface1000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 How would he be taking me apart when he has yet to come up with a valid argument? How many people viewed this video? How many viewed this video and "liked" it? You're assuming that you have to be arguing/commenting on this board in order to mark someone as spam or thumb them down. You're also assuming that you have to commment/argue in order to be motivated enough to spam somone. You just made the Logical Fallacy of the False Cause. Wrong side of the road again mate.
NRAdude 1 week ago
@NRAdude And so you equate the British Labour party as being the same as Hitler & the Nazi's? You must be barking mad. You need to restrained in a straight jacket and placed in a padded cell for your own protection. You speak more nonsense than any human being in the history of humanity. You make Ann Coulter look logical and not prejudiced
goatface1000 6 days ago
@NRAdude Also I forgot to add, Churchill was not by the standards of his day on the right of the Conservative party. Indeed he was for some time a member of the LIBERAL party. You really should check your facts. What is it like to be weak both physically and intellectually? A pathetic creep who never goes out because he has no friends and just sits in fromt of a screen like a geek. Overweight with a goatee beard the epitome of trailer trash. Beaten by men better than you.
goatface1000 4 days ago
@goatface1000 LOL...he's a piece of work. He doesn't quite grasp that his games have been checked.
sgtisaloser 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser Checked by whom? I have yet to see a response from you?
NRAdude 4 days ago
@NRAdude LOL...you've seen my responses, you've just erased them. That's okay, since your responses have gotten erased or spammed too.
This game will continue until you learn to behave. It's really that easy. Now, if you're willing to be adult, I'll ask the folks once again (last time it took me twice) to stop spamming/voting you down.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser No I haven't seen your responses save this one. And once again, I'm not spamming you nor have I ever done so. You have yet to provide proof let alone any evidence that I've done so. I honestly don't care who spams my posts since your contradictory arguments will be here to amuse many people to come. I do, however, find it funny that you're the one admitting to spamming me and yet you accuse others of doing so to you. Typical liberal
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude What you claim to have seen is meaningless. I responded, and even talked about you in the third person as well (to goatface). Most you've managed to 'spam' in a couple of hours.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser Meaningless? Didn't you say that you knew (somehow) that I saw it? Therefore if you want to call what you say meaningless, I'm in perfect agreement with you. :)
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude I also said 'I believe you have more than one persona', and I still do. Thus, I don't have to provide 'proof' on a belief.
Well, if you don't care who spams you, good, cuz plenty are.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser Yes you do unless you want to claim you believe something without proof. And I don't know who you're talking about "spamming" me since I still see my comments up :)
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude I never 'admitted' to spamming you; I said others are. I even asked the others NOT to spam you because your statements make mine look even better.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser You specifically said that you asked others to spam me. Thus it is of your doing. Is it not?
NRAdude 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser And my comments are still up. Despite your antics. Haha
NRAdude 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser No he is still in the playground he is only a boy perhaps when he grows up he will learn some sense and also perhaps gain some humanity and compassion,
goatface1000 4 days ago
Comment removed
neoconsnightmare5 3 days ago
@goatface1000 LOL...he's sad and funny at the same time. Clearly, there are PLENTY of people here that want to silence him. He'll have to stop with his games.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@NRAdude Now when did I say that after conquering America that I intended to make Jews wear a yellow star and herd them into ghettos prior to transporting them to concentration camps where they would be worked to death or gassed if they were too weak to work? When did I say that I was going to do the same with gypsies, freemasons & the mentally subnormal. Going from memory I think I said that I was going to nationalise Disney, turn the Yankee Satadium into a cricket ground
goatface1000 1 week ago
@NRAdude and outlaw American beer.I also said that I lead an army of humans animals including as I remember crocodiles. But you know I was only joking having a laugh, I never had any have no intention of intention of leading an invasion of the USA. I may have an eccentric sense of humour but I am not (Unlike you) delusional. I was as we say in Britain 'Taking the piss' Which means to ridicule or to take unfair advantage.
goatface1000 1 week ago
@NRAdude Are you suggesting that it may be Caspercee? Well I have to say that I doubt it. Casper and I do not agree on very much but at least he does not block people who disagree with him from his page and I have never known him to be untruthful unlike you who would not know the truth if it hit you arounf the head with a fence post. So whilst I think Casper is wrong on many counts I do not think he would behave in such a way. It is also very childish to do this whch again points to you
goatface1000 1 week ago
@goatface1000 Killer is, NRA isn't a DUMB guy...he's probably fairly intelligence. He takes that intelligence, however, and uses it farily idiotically.
He's so predictable, too. When he can't outwit, he lies; when he's outed for lying, he and his likely multiple personalities 'spam' folks.
Very odd, very sad and kinda very funny.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgtisaloser Prove where I lied and what multiple personalities I allegedly have. Time to put up or shut up. If you can't prove it then you're making another baseless accusation out of frustration.
NRAdude 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Prove I allegedly contradicted myself. Time to put up or shut up. If you can't prove it then you're making another baseless accusation out of impotent frustration.
Oh yeah, please also prove you have that alleged book on logic. You know, the one that has all the answers, yet you can't seem to produce.
Please provide the books name/author/edition. Time to 'put up or shut up'. LOL
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
@NRAdude Once again baby boy you display your ignorance of my great country and also you total stupidity. Churchill lost the 1945 election and Labour instituted the Welfare State which included the National Health Service (NHS) When the Conservatives won the next election they conducted a study of the NHS and elected to continue with it. We still it today even Thatcher did not dare to get rid of it. I have never heard of Churchill calling the NHS 'Gestapo' He may have
goatface1000 5 days ago
@goatface1000 He did say it. Go look it up. Churchill was opposed to your national healthcare program from the get-go. Oh and here we go with "Churchill was a liberal since we like to think of him as one" argument.. Just like Reagan was a democrat before he was a Republican, Churchill was a Conservative after he recognized the liberal party for what it was. You either witheld this information when you posted your response or you were ignorant of your own country's history. Try again mate
NRAdude 4 days ago
@NRAdude Once agaon you are wrong, he was a cConservative then Liberal the once again Conservative. Now I bow to nobody in my admiration for Churchill. He acted as the catalyst for our victory in WW2 however for miost of his life he was a total screw up and only during the war did he flourish.
goatface1000 4 days ago
@NRAdude I have looked again and found the actual quote you are alluding to it is Churchill even went as far as to stay that if Labour were elected it would need to "fall back on some kind of Gestapo" to implement its policies.Not quite what you said, As I said before when Churchill regained the premiership he made no attempt to get rid of the NHS and indeed today our Conservative PM extols it'svirtues. You really talk a load of garbage. People like sgtisaloser and myslef
goatface1000 4 days ago
@goatface1000 "once agaon?" Please learn how to spell mate. And no he was a liberal starting in 1904 and became a Conservative again in the 1920s. Once again you don't know your history mate. And what do you mean not what I said? That is what I said. Are you trying to twist my words now? I could really care less what you and sgt think however what is at stake is what is pure and simple. Wrong side of the road still jolly ol boy?
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude You've yet to offer proof that I'm allegedly a 'liberal'. Do you BELIEVE I'm one? If so, please state as such.
Otherwise, you must provide proof. Have a nice day.
sgtisaloser 3 days ago
@sgtisaloser If you aren't going to provide proof for my supposed "personas" then why should I provide proof for you being a liberal? You can't have it both ways son
NRAdude 3 days ago
@NRAdude Churchill became premier in the second post WW2 election and made no attempt to closethe NHS. He may not have liked it but he still recognised that the people wanted it, You do not know the history of America let alone that of Britain.
goatface1000 3 days ago
@NRAdude are not impresssed and are too intelligent to be bullied by your rhetoric and pseudo facts, This is not the playground, Goat 189 NRAdud 0
goatface1000 4 days ago
@NRAdude done so but I doubt if this fanatical anti nazi would have cheapened himself to say that. What possible connection is there between the NHS & the Gestapo. Also Atlee was the deputy prime minister in the war and had Churchill's respect.You need to sort yourself out. You are heading for a sausage whipping. I have heard it said that you are a traitor to the uSA.
goatface1000 5 days ago
Comment removed
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude He noticed because he SAW YOU spamming me (who else would?).
Dude, when I logged on and saw his message, I logged off and hit the back key. Page 3, 4 and 5 are all marked as 'Spam'.
As you do this, I'll call on others do spam you again.
When you stop, I'll have them stop. This is how the game will be played until you learn to behave.
Just because I've humiliated you doesn't mean you should resort to that; I'm STILL going to repost everything on those page, you know?
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Oh yeah, PROVE I allegedly 'contradicted' myself in all my responses.
I proved that YOU contradicted yourself when you said on page 2/1 hour ago (as of my typing this) that "...I haven't tried to prove anything..." when you JUST said 36 minutes ago (as of this writing) that allegedly , "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
Wow, you made that easy for me. You're getting more frustrated and desperate with each response.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
@NRAdude AND DON'T CALL ME A NAZI. It is an insult to the those who died in the holocaust. Those who you believe are now in hell. You are a really strange boy.
goatface1000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@goatface1000 I will continue to speak the truth, in which case you being a socialist is simply another branch of being a National Socialist.
NRAdude 1 week ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven. Answer the question.
NRAdude 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude said: "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
I thought you just said you weren't trying to prove anything just making assumptions. Yet you claim here (and earlier) that you've proven something. Contradiction.
" Answer the question. " I have answered the question. Just because you don't like my answer, or find it inconvenient to your position doesn't mean it hasn't been answered.
You really MUST try harder. LOL.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Oh yeah, PROVE I allegedly 'contradicted' myself in all my responses.
I proved that YOU contradicted yourself when you said on page 2/1 hour ago (as of my typing this) that "...I haven't tried to prove anything..." when you JUST said 36 minutes ago (as of this writing) that allegedly , "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
Wow, you made that easy for me. You're getting more frustrated and desperate with each response.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "Contradictions in all of your responses that have already been proven."
I thought you just said you weren't trying to prove anything just making assumptions. Yet you claim here (and earlier) that you've proven something. Contradiction.
" Answer the question. " I have answered the question. Just because you don't like my answer, or find it inconvenient to your position doesn't mean it hasn't been answered.
You really MUST try harder. LOL.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "I haven't tried to prove anything yet". Prove you haven't.
" but you've contradicted yourself everytime you've tried to argue humans created logic"
Logic as YOU use it here (persuasive written/verbal argument) is strictly human, the rules are made up by humans thus it IS human...and fallible.
", therefore the opposite must be true." You've lost it now.
" Try again." Don't have to. YOU do.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude "Oh and by the way this statement of yours is invalid if one were to assume that logic were fallible." And, oh, by the way, THIS and ALL statements by you are invalid since logic (as you use it - persuasive written/verbal argument) is only found in humans/used by humans/ rules made by humans and thus fallible.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
How does not paying your debts make you great?
aon10003 1 week ago
Kinda scary to hear nancy pelosi talk like that, and of course Ronald Reagan, the gem of the Republican party, always nice.
unclearimage 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude " As for autmobiles, they are engines correct? Do you think that all engines were created by humans?"
Doesn't matter. I said 'automobiles', not 'engines'.
By your seemingly NEW standards, nothing is 'human made'. I mean, my source on T. Roosevelt who wrote a book saying he was no 'conservative' used paper. Paper comes from trees. Trees have been on the planet billions of years before humans.
So, per your new logic, that means EVERYTHING is infallible.
LOL...you see that's wrong
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude " As for autmobiles, they are engines correct? Do you think that all engines were created by humans?"
Doesn't matter. I said 'automobiles', not 'engines'.
By your seemingly NEW standards, nothing is 'human made'. I mean, my source on T. Roosevelt who wrote a book saying he was no 'conservative' used paper. Paper comes from trees. Trees have been on the planet billions of years before humans.
So, per your new logic, that means EVERYTHING is infallible.
LOL...you see that's wrong
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NRAdude Hey, where's that imaginary book of logic you allegedly have?
Could you (re)post it's:
name;
author;
edition;
so I can verify that it's infallible? Bwahahahahahahahaha...that was mean of me.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is outstanding!
shhotput 1 week ago
Comment removed
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There will never be another Reagan. Thank God that we had him while we did. Wish we could have him again.
doublechunkfunk 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AWESOME. It really contrasts the difference between the paths of liberty and slavery. Too bad we don't have a deliverer of the message (Reagan) to contrast the intentions of the Socialists in the video.
jhowardgators 1 week ago
@NRAdude "I continue to oppose the so-called stimulus package because it has been a failure. It has failed at job creation....
"It is my obligation as a member of Congress to ensure stimulus dollars are spent on the most worthy projects. I did just that when I supported applications for the TIGER grant program."
Rep Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota , MinnPost response, Oct 18, 2010.
Ouch. Wonder if Cantor had the balls to be so contradictory, or if he wussed out and stayed quiet?
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
@sgtisaloser And who runs the Minnesota post? Humans? Therefore, Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Authority. Even if we assume that this "source" of yours is true, I do not see any begging in this quote. And if you're saying that she lied, then she didn't beg since she was not sincere hence you continue to contradict yourself. Quite funny. And I thought you said logic was fallible? Which means this argument of yours is fallible since it attempts to use logic
NRAdude 1 week ago
@NRAdude "And I thought you said logic was fallible?"
Quote me where I said that. You can't. I said 'logic as YOU use it (persuasive written or verbal argument) is fallible, since only humans engage in persuasive written and verbal arguments.'
YOU said humans are fallible, so that means 'logical fallacies', which are ONLY done by humas, are, by definition, fallible.
Try and try to argue your point, you'll fail each time.
By the way, the 'source' was Michele Bachmann herself.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago
@sgtisaloser Here's where you said it "logic as YOU use it (persuasive written or verbal argument) is fallible, since only humans engage in persuasive written and verbal arguments." Regardless of whether I use it or not, it's still logic correct? Therefore, you're saying that logic is fallible. You have just contradicted all of your arguments thus far. Again.
NRAdude 1 week ago
@NRAdude Not 'regardless of whether' you use it or not. You ARE arguing about 'logical fallacies' as though they are cure alls when you've painted yourself in a corner.
It's a FACT that only humans are known to use 'logical fallacies' since only humans are known to engage in 'persuasive written and verbal arguments'.
YOU said that humans are fallible.
Therefore, anything related to 'persuasive written and verbal arguments' is human and thus fallible.
Show where I've 'contradicted' myself.
sgtisaloser 1 week ago