Genesis 7:2-3 the Lord says to Noah, "ake with you seven[a] of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, and also seven of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth."
I agree with you that dinosaurs were fossilized from the flood.. but just wanted to point out this discrepancy in your video
You are tottaly right!! Unbelievably I was going to touch this subject today with my subs and you came out with it today, it's a good thing in my book. Yes! Dinosaurs are HYBRID animals created by the Annunaki and Yahweh destroyed them with watter, not only humans wore and is contaminated by reptilian DNA but Animals and sea Creatures as well. I will share this video, thanks for learning the truth God bless and guide you.
If evolution doesnt exist and we are all decendants of Noah and everyone on the ark... then
Noah and everyone on the ark had every disease known to man. Herpies, aids, the clap, cancer, mono, the black plague, the bubonic plague, thyphoid fever, swine flu, Polio, small pox, cholera, Ebola, Malaria, Spanish flu, and about a billion other things.
Since viruses cant evolve then they cant create themselves and they were on the arc.
Also, I heard on "Through the Wormhole" that the "Carbon Dating" system is incorrect due to atom deterioration is increased with time. So when they say such and such is millions of years old based on carbon dating, They Are WRONG!!
@gorilla199 I'm an astrophysics research associate at Purdue University. The part of "Through the Wormhole" you're referring to featured Purdue's own Professor Ephraim Fischbach. I see and talk to him frequently. In fact, he stopped by my lab no more than a couple weeks ago and we began talking about his appearance on the program. I can assure you, radiometric dating techniques are not as radically called into question as you want to think.
@gorilla199 At most, something dated to be, say, 100 million years old, may be off by a couple thousand years or so. Not much at all. Our sun has been stable for the past 3 billion years or so (a large fraction of it's age), so we have very little reason to worry.
@gorilla199 What's much more important here is potentially refining our understanding of how radiative decay processes are effected by the electromagnetic properties of *other* particles (rather than just simple scattering events going on all the time). I'll be attending Professor Fischbach's colloquium in my department coming up here on Jan 19. Please come along and learn a thing or two before blowing things out of proportion simply to cater to your religious whims and notions.
Noah's Ark is in CHINA in the TIAN SHAN mnts. (real mnts. of ararat) The flood was not global and was meant only to kill the nephelim. Not the world full of people in AFRICA,ASIA,EUROPE MIDDLE EAST and the AMERICAS. I have pics of it. WANT to see them. Message me on my channel.
Everyone is making fun of faithfull for shame shame shame . Dr. Who helped out Noah . He moved the ark around to diffrent locations to pick up the animals ! Dr. Who speed up the time so it didnt take 60 years to load /unload all the animals . Dr. Who made the ark like a Tardis bigger on the inside to fit them all in . Dr. Who inserted extra genetic material so the animals would'nt die from genetic etinction from inbreeding over generations . . Praise the time lord!
its true that only fossils formed when quickly buried in water and sediment. not gradually, only quickly. works perfect wiht flood in bible.plus their carbon dating is bogus. they put it with their made up billions of years chart.
This poor guy says that he will prove this scientifically. The first words out of mouth is that bones are made up only calcium is wrong. Then the rest of the tyrant is down hill from there. People like this are the best reason creationism has lost creditability and is not accepted as a creditable theory . If you ignore science and facts you are delusional to say you have proved something scientifically. The sad part, he thinks that viewers can't see through the numerous errors.
god is aliens, noahs ark is a spaceship with a database of dna, tower of babel was spacecraft that god(aliens) shot out of the sky and the life pods got spread across the globe and people lost contact for hundreds of years and ended up speaking different languages just like the bible says, sodom and gomorah were leveled because people wanted to rape the angels(aliens) so they said get out we are glassing this town from atmosphere
Most people don't even know evolution's TRUE ORGIN it is a HINDU belief that all is one and one is all! So if you believe this theory then you should know it comes from hindu culture...Nothing is new under the sun! The Evolution Theory is being taught to condition people to the One Word Order Agenda Hindu beliefs is at the fore front of this people shd do their research READ the Lost Books Of The Bible and the dots will connect & remember everything you know comes from mankind including science
This is basically a rehashing of the "seashells up a mountain" problem, one that stumped no less a man than Thomas Jefferson. Unlike Jefferson however we now have the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the movement of the continents, the raising of the mountains, and much more besides.
I would suggest for a history of the Earth and its lifeforms both living and extinct, The Ancestors Tale by Richard Dawkins, it includes 2000yrs more human scholarly study than your current references.
@gorilla199 There is a big difference between Richard Dawkins and god. Richard Dawkins exists. We can see pictures of him and videos. I have never seen any proof that god exists. I would prefer if you would stop saying that the credibility of one of my favorite authors as you say s**t. I don't care that you preach you nephilim fantasy but please and see reptilians and freemasons everywhere. Just don't bring sane people into you problems with your brain. Don't call me a freemason, because i'm not
hmmm u kno 2 disregard the obviose asteroid crator n the gulf of mexico that radio carbon dating has placed it @ rufly 65,000000 yrs ago is mad and 2 say that given reference 2 the bible they made no statement of ther being any kind of "giant reptiles" 4 noah 2 choose from leaves me 2 think ur a looney that needs 2 read a whole hell of alot more
I agree with you regarding almost everything you said. However, the Book of Jasher says that Enoch died. Now, we know Enoch went with God, he was translated. That's scriptural. So I have a hard time taking the book of Jasher seriously, because of that.
Each day of the Lord is of a thousand years. Did he not create the earth over billions of our years, taking seven days over this span? Was there not morning and evening created on each of those days, as during the different phases of creation were there not reformations that took place, some in Satan's rebellion of darkness, some as part of Gods creation. The word of God is in his scriptures, we pray for understanding, that THE VAIL BE LIFTED. Amen
Fail at 2:40. "That means the whole Earth was under water". Fail. No that only means the bone was subjected to water. A mud puddle, a pond, a river, a swamp, a glacier, and ocean, etc. Not all bones need to be subjected to water at the same time. You could have one bone in one place covered by a swamp... which then dries up while another bone in a desert is submerged due to a melting glacier, etc.
Not all archeoligists or Palaeontologists are freemasons. It would be next to impossible to hide fossil evidence. However I should get going becaus arguing with someone who belives in reptilians is pointless.
On that matter though: do creationists actually believe plate tectonics? That theory might be destructive for your pov as the climate over a piece of land would vary depending on where on the globe it is...
So you said "I'll scientifically disprove evolution" to then shut up about evolution for the rest of your video...
Then I looked up fossilization. I don't know much of it, but there seem to be different types of fossilization, and I didn't really find the necessity for water in all of them. I did read that for what you described, water had to come into play for a short amount of time, but I don't know of pieces of land that were dry for the entire history of earth.
Satan is a humanist in comparison. By the way, Al Pacino made an awesome devil. Just finished watching Devil's Advocate. Amazing guy, how could you not love him.
how can u say there is no evolution and then say there was some mutations? u know what the difference between a mutation and evolution is ?
evolution is change over a long period of time , mutation on the other han is evolution over a short period of time... if there is evolution there is mutation and if theres mutation theres evolution. make your choice
Wow. My problem. Yes, I suppose it is. Why so defensive? I'm simply pointing out that there were unclean beasts that entered the ark. If you are indeed reading Genesis, you can't miss it. That's why I gave you the chapter reference.
And you're not exactly being very Christ-like if that's how you respond to people. Not sure where all the anger is coming from.
Ummm...Genesis Chapter 7 describes the clean and unclean beasts that entered the ark. There are other unclean beasts besides those depicted of the dinosaurs. The other book you mention of is not in the Bible, which is not we should necessarily embrace as truth. There are other books that were left out of the Bible-for good reason.
So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar.
if its written about in our bible, shouldn't that mean it is also holy scriptures? I think many things people cant explain about the old testament are because this book has been left out
If for a moment, we assume a more symbolic translation of Bible whereas the 6 days merely represented a passage of time too large for most people to grasp, then not only does the controversy about dinosaurs disappears, but also the controversy between the Creation story & Evolutionary Theory.
many tried to conform but IT'S simply not true!!! Yahweh created in 6 DAYS!!! and there is no evolution. whoever wants to believe in this lie can do. i stay in scriptures.
When you think about it, even the Big Bang Theory has everything being created from nothing. The only difference between religions view and sciences view is not how things happened, but who started it all: God or Random Chance. With the complexity of the Universe and all that is in it Random Chance looks more absurd.
The key controversy to this whole thing is the belief in the literal translation of the Bible where it says that God created the world in only 6 days. The scientific world says the Earth is much older. Thus this is the heart of where religion vs. science disagrees.
Actually mud can turn stuff into fossils too, so can ice, and amber, the La Brea Tar Pits have/had lots of fossils and many imprints from carbon are found the continents. Also the continents were shaped differently which would cause water to be in different areas which redneck trucker explains good. If you respond give an answer not beating around the bush saying that it's devil science.
Pope Benedict XVI said the debate raging in some countries — particularly the United States and his native Germany — between creationism and evolution was an "absurdity," saying that evolution can coexist with faith.
The pontiff, speaking as he was concluding his holiday in northern Italy, also said that while there is much scientific proof to support evolution, the theory could not exclude a role by God.
So which group is the pope a secret member of that's hiding the truth?
In the King James version of the Bible, Noah is instructed to bring 2 of every Unclean animal and 7 of every Clean animal and birds. All land masses of this planet have been underwater at one time or another, the dinosaur bones that you reference are not in a uniform layer of sediment. They are spread out over millions of years of geological time and show a progressive evolution of life on Earth. No book can possibly be more convincing than proven scientific fact.
If you listen to John F Kennedy's speech about the worldwide conspiracy involving Government, Science etc you will realise that human bones are found but it is keep nice and quite from you.
So, the conditions were right for extremely rapid, geologically layered fossilization during Noah's flood. Neat! Specifically, which of the millions of animal species present on the earth were on the ark and which are post flood mutations? What about plants? How long did it take to gather all the non-aquatic plants? Or did they manage to just get seeds... and spores? What did everything eat for that week? To where did the water run off? I have so many thoughts on this!
Thank you sir! I downloaded a pdf version. It didn't answer any of my questions but it is very interesting. Now I have more questions. Who is the real originator of this book and where did he get this information. Why is it not a part of the recognized bible or discussed more among Christians? Is this the same book of Jasher mentioned in Johua and Samuel II? ...and another thing: isn't calcium already a rock? Just a thought.
1. If the Book of Jasher didnt help you then neither can I.
2. The originator of the Book is God, just like all Scripture.
3. It's not recognised because the Satanists who worked alongside Constantine kept it out s that the number of Books in the Bible would be 66 (a Satanic number)
4. Yes it's the same Book mentioned in Joshua and 2nd Samuel
5. Re: Calcium already being a rock (Science pages can be found on Google)
A copy of the Book of Enoch will fill in the blanks a bit more for you.
it was also once believed that the earth was the center of the universe and more locally the sun orbited the earth. until the church was disproved and reluctantly accepted that fact. just give it time
if the devil runs everything on earth (science and the churches), and the bible is on earth and was writen by the men who founded the churches,then would it not follow that the bible is the work of the devil? i know you'll say no its not but how do you know?
evolution is real, bacteria and virii become resistant to antibiotic and antiviral medication by changing their dna in response to, to put it simply, being killed by these chemicals.
It is true that there has to be some kind of submergence or flood to soak the bone in order to begin the process of fossilization, but it does not mean that there was a single large catastrophic flood. The fact is, there were possibly many floods at different parts of the world, at different periods of times. The so called evidence you presented does not strictly (without contradiction) lead to the conclusion that God deemed the dinosaurs as unclean, nor does it disprove evolution.
This is a huge misunderstanding of how fossils are formed. The calcium in bones don't necessarily TURN into rock, but rather minerals are absorbed into the bone and over time the minerals replace the bone. Essentially, then the bones can be said to be turned to stone, but not the calcium.
Actually, fossils on mountains can be explained by tectonic activity. Two plates meet, force up a large section of earth and create a mountain range. Better explanation than believing in a book of fairy tales.
Wow! That makes alot of sense. Everywhere on earth are rocks and that means dinosaurs were everywhere and they were unclean, so that they could not be on the ark. Then the whole earth flooded and killed all dinosaurs, which became rocks
But i have a feeling the so called Loch ness Monsters or plesiosaurus type creatures did not die as they were aquatic in the first place and when it flooded it did not affect the aquatic monsters only the land monsters so the plesiosaurus monsters did not evolve, they could still be alive today known as the loch ness monster
There is no such thing as evolution, it simply is impossible to probve because there is absolutely no evidence of evolution. Tere is only evidence that evolution cannot possibly be. Each creature has its own flesh.
If an elephant used to be a fish it would still have the flesh of a fish. Apes and humans have different fleash and so does every creature. Just as God said.
Interesting information about the formation process of fossils. Assuming it is correct, that still does not disprove the theory of evolution or the possibility that different areas were under water at different times....I'm looking forward to watching the next video to see where yo are going with this.
Evolution is impossible to prove therefor what need is there to disprove it!?
Evolution has no scientific credibility it is only a theory and even Darwin who came up with the theory repented of it on his death bed. Good ideo considering he was about to meet The Creator.
Flesh NOT made by God is flesh which is a mixture of animals, animals & humans, fallen angels and humans/animals/plants etc.
The contexts of Hebrew word meanings and contexts, like Greek, are different from English. They have dual meanings and contexts.
Dinosaurs were created by the fallen angels by mixing animals. Monsters like half man half horse, Dinosaurs etc were all their work and they did this to vex God (Book of Enoch)
i actually think they were made when man was made but ok w/e but you also teach from the book of enoch but the bible also say you cannot add or take away from the bible so it could be considered a manuscript not a book of the bible
"Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate"
I meant in reference to the reason you give as to why the dinosaurs died out. Supposedly because they were unclean and so were not allowed on to the ark - if I understood you correctly. But according to Genesis 7:2 the unclean animals were brought onto the ark just not in as great a number.
That aspect of "unclean" refers to animals fit to eat or for Sacrifice.
Noah was chosen because he was of "pure Stock" (human stock). The same applies for the animals God made "Each of their own kind" (refers to their flesh as every animal on Earth, regardless of DNA "similrities" has its own particular flesh.
Any flesh not made by God is "Unclean" in the sense that it is an Abomination.
Would not dinosaurs fit into one of those categories though? They're either fit to eat or sacrifice or they're not? And so would be taken aboard the ark?
I'm also unclear what would constitute flesh not made by God.
Is the relation of discovered dinosaur fossils and human fossils an indication of the quantities of both species related to one other when the flood came?
Again, why have we found practically no human fossils?
Of course human fossils have been found, one of them wqas wearing a cowboy boot Fossils of Giants have also been found. A part fossilised tyranosaur bone with marrow and blood cells has also been found.
As for indicative quantities: How could I possibly know, do you know?
The only trustworthy indication would be in the Holy Scriptures.
No, the trustworthy is not the Holy Scripture which is a giant axiom. Science tries to use as few axioms as possible... you know like "things we experience can be studied in order to understand truth" which in itself can't be proven, but it seems reasonable to start from there and not from scripture when it comes to setting valid axioms.
"Darwin confessed Jesus Christ when he was dying. So he renounced his own theory when it was time to meet the Almighty."
I do not know if you laid out a truthful premisse here, because I've heard rebuttals on the topic. If it is true, nevertheless, that is illogic reasoning unless all people who believe in Jesus Christ as saviour also disbelieve evolution theory. And that is not the case.
Why have I never read in any of my science magazines of these giant fossils? I've only seen pictures of them on creation pages. Science don't ignore findings like that. Science are after the truth, no matter what the truth is.
If you like science magazines you could ask yourself why my hypothesis on the Mig Foxbat was published word for word by the BBC FOCUS Magazine with someone elses name on the credits. As for pictures, forget magazines, look on the net. Science does not involve Truth. Science can be a label for any hypothesis true or false or an axiom even.
You can find a lot of pictures on the net that claims to be related with reality, but in fact is not. A science magazine don't use photoshop and claim it is an original picture. That is likely to happen on the internet however.
As for your article, that sounds awful. Hope you find the time to sue their asses off.
"that's the only way fossils can form" No, landslides, mudslides, volcanic eruptions, shallow water deposition and sedimentation are the most common sources of fossilized remains, i think even in that order.
Honestly who told you this this stuff about fossils? who did you hear it from? haha look up the word, " bias " in the dictionary before you put all your faith into what your told.
is this guy for real? sounds like all his science knowledge from a preacher trying to keep the sheep in the herd. HAHA dude your a sheep and your spiting something it is completly untrue man. Well if you believe the fairy tail of the bible you'll believe antying your told so im not surprised. Open your eyes and shed your wool my fellow man, do not be one of the brain washed masses of bible zealots, look to the new info, the bible is ancient and archaic written by man. wake up sir.
you do not need water to make a fossil!! only minerals from the earth! that is totally twisting the facts, asfor a flood the size as described in the bible it would jst scatter the bones not bury them
yes, you viewof evlutin is clearly wrong, frogs and gorillas are modern animals as we are, we did not evolve from the goillas you see today, we evolved from a similar speices to all the great apes, and i dont think it was a frog, more likly a mammal
You will see that "Neanderthal man" was in fact a group of people (Tower of Babel) who planned to kill God. Their punishment was that God made them take on the appearance of apes. Other he made take on the appearance of Elephants. Theres your "missing link" and also the Indian Elephant "god" man.
ok then, once youcan find me the garden of eden, the tower of babel(which as he bible describes it is huge so you cannot miss it) ad yo can explain to me when all the water for a flood that size came to and left, and then you explain to m why we share over 98% of our genes with the great apes
Hypothesis, Theory, Law. It's called the THEORY of Evolution because it can't be proven. Evolutionist love to call Creationists stupid while they present a Theory as a Law. I takes as much faith to be an Evolutionist as it does to be a Creationist. They are both Theory's in the strictest scientific sense.
what you mean evolution never happened!! its still happening! evolution did not finish with us, we are not a climax of evolution, we as humans are still evolving, our backs ae still getting straight as r our legs, evolution does happen and is still happening all living things ar evolving, if mutation and natural selection are true then evolution must be in some way
@76malibuman i guess couldnt find proof in bible of how dinosuars are unclean animals...so basically he just doesnt know what hes talkin about
Rizon513 4 weeks ago
where is partII?
76malibuman 4 weeks ago
Genesis 7:2-3 the Lord says to Noah, "ake with you seven[a] of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, and also seven of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth."
I agree with you that dinosaurs were fossilized from the flood.. but just wanted to point out this discrepancy in your video
jamsoonii 4 months ago
part 2?
JAYBud88 5 months ago
You are tottaly right!! Unbelievably I was going to touch this subject today with my subs and you came out with it today, it's a good thing in my book. Yes! Dinosaurs are HYBRID animals created by the Annunaki and Yahweh destroyed them with watter, not only humans wore and is contaminated by reptilian DNA but Animals and sea Creatures as well. I will share this video, thanks for learning the truth God bless and guide you.
luisnitro91 6 months ago
@luisnitro91
job 40:15 nehold now behemoth , which i made with thee....
then he goes on to describe what sounds to me like a dinosaur. Nephilium were the hybrid ? no?
TheMejohnsonhvac 3 weeks ago
@TheMejohnsonhvac Look for the defension of HYBRID! if you argue about this I will not answer back.
luisnitro91 3 weeks ago
If evolution doesnt exist and we are all decendants of Noah and everyone on the ark... then
Noah and everyone on the ark had every disease known to man. Herpies, aids, the clap, cancer, mono, the black plague, the bubonic plague, thyphoid fever, swine flu, Polio, small pox, cholera, Ebola, Malaria, Spanish flu, and about a billion other things.
Since viruses cant evolve then they cant create themselves and they were on the arc.
HOW DID THESE PEOPLE SURVIVE? LOL
Bajungadustin 7 months ago
The dinosaurs were from another AGE
Also, I heard on "Through the Wormhole" that the "Carbon Dating" system is incorrect due to atom deterioration is increased with time. So when they say such and such is millions of years old based on carbon dating, They Are WRONG!!
youeffohs 7 months ago
@youeffohs
Well if they were simply wrong that would be excusable in their ignorance but they know full well they are lying
Their place in Hell is well deserved
gorilla199 7 months ago
@gorilla199 I'm an astrophysics research associate at Purdue University. The part of "Through the Wormhole" you're referring to featured Purdue's own Professor Ephraim Fischbach. I see and talk to him frequently. In fact, he stopped by my lab no more than a couple weeks ago and we began talking about his appearance on the program. I can assure you, radiometric dating techniques are not as radically called into question as you want to think.
CarlSagan6 1 month ago
@gorilla199 At most, something dated to be, say, 100 million years old, may be off by a couple thousand years or so. Not much at all. Our sun has been stable for the past 3 billion years or so (a large fraction of it's age), so we have very little reason to worry.
CarlSagan6 1 month ago
@gorilla199 What's much more important here is potentially refining our understanding of how radiative decay processes are effected by the electromagnetic properties of *other* particles (rather than just simple scattering events going on all the time). I'll be attending Professor Fischbach's colloquium in my department coming up here on Jan 19. Please come along and learn a thing or two before blowing things out of proportion simply to cater to your religious whims and notions.
CarlSagan6 1 month ago
@youeffohs but we have other methods of dating as well... carbon is not the only method used.
Zoaguyver 2 months ago
mmmmm cinnamon grahams
youeffohs 7 months ago
Noah's Ark is in CHINA in the TIAN SHAN mnts. (real mnts. of ararat) The flood was not global and was meant only to kill the nephelim. Not the world full of people in AFRICA,ASIA,EUROPE MIDDLE EAST and the AMERICAS. I have pics of it. WANT to see them. Message me on my channel.
tubermier 7 months ago
Noah's ark was dinosaur.
uniontera 7 months ago
Everyone is making fun of faithfull for shame shame shame . Dr. Who helped out Noah . He moved the ark around to diffrent locations to pick up the animals ! Dr. Who speed up the time so it didnt take 60 years to load /unload all the animals . Dr. Who made the ark like a Tardis bigger on the inside to fit them all in . Dr. Who inserted extra genetic material so the animals would'nt die from genetic etinction from inbreeding over generations . . Praise the time lord!
flyingscience 8 months ago
you hav done your research!!!
rafyraf100 8 months ago
@MattieKav
Stupidest statement of the Day award goes to you
What a Jackass !
gorilla199 8 months ago
This has to be a hoax.
Cainkane1 9 months ago
its true that only fossils formed when quickly buried in water and sediment. not gradually, only quickly. works perfect wiht flood in bible.plus their carbon dating is bogus. they put it with their made up billions of years chart.
zackrowe1 10 months ago
This poor guy says that he will prove this scientifically. The first words out of mouth is that bones are made up only calcium is wrong. Then the rest of the tyrant is down hill from there. People like this are the best reason creationism has lost creditability and is not accepted as a creditable theory . If you ignore science and facts you are delusional to say you have proved something scientifically. The sad part, he thinks that viewers can't see through the numerous errors.
yeudh 10 months ago
Thank you for all your work. I cant seem to find the second part of this video.. is there a reason for that? Its nail biting material. God bless
emotionlessdevotion 11 months ago
wait so dinasours are genetic mutations? who mutated them if humans didn't have the technology, didn't God created them??
cussi84 1 year ago
@cussi84
The Nephilim mutated them by mixing up their kinds together
gorilla199 1 year ago
@gorilla199 I just want to clarify, do you mean that they bred them?
TheOmniscientSpanner 8 months ago
If evolution were true, there wouldn't be so many morons walking around doing stupid things like voting for 0bama.
KnightOwl2006 1 year ago
where is part 2?
tooquick6 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god is aliens, noahs ark is a spaceship with a database of dna, tower of babel was spacecraft that god(aliens) shot out of the sky and the life pods got spread across the globe and people lost contact for hundreds of years and ended up speaking different languages just like the bible says, sodom and gomorah were leveled because people wanted to rape the angels(aliens) so they said get out we are glassing this town from atmosphere
gonadcancervictim 1 year ago
Most people don't even know evolution's TRUE ORGIN it is a HINDU belief that all is one and one is all! So if you believe this theory then you should know it comes from hindu culture...Nothing is new under the sun! The Evolution Theory is being taught to condition people to the One Word Order Agenda Hindu beliefs is at the fore front of this people shd do their research READ the Lost Books Of The Bible and the dots will connect & remember everything you know comes from mankind including science
Childofpraise2Yahweh 1 year ago
@nE1canC1
How about looking 100 million years in the past dumbass. There is your proof.
CrossConsoleGamer 1 year ago
@CrossConsoleGamer I don't have a time machine, dumbass.
nE1canC1 1 year ago
you poor man may the real god give you a brain
funkster22657 1 year ago
why would God put dinosaurs on the ark anyway. he'd know an over populated earth couldn't live along side these gigantic monsters. lol
nE1canC1 1 year ago
Comment removed
nE1canC1 1 year ago
May I ask, What are you educational qualification..??
S00rabh 1 year ago
Evolution did happen, it's a fact. The aftermath of it is undisputable.
CrossConsoleGamer 1 year ago
@CrossConsoleGamer prove it! oh wait you can't, because I would have to stick around for at least 100 million+ years to find out. LOL
nE1canC1 1 year ago
This is basically a rehashing of the "seashells up a mountain" problem, one that stumped no less a man than Thomas Jefferson. Unlike Jefferson however we now have the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the movement of the continents, the raising of the mountains, and much more besides.
I would suggest for a history of the Earth and its lifeforms both living and extinct, The Ancestors Tale by Richard Dawkins, it includes 2000yrs more human scholarly study than your current references.
sibellicu 1 year ago
@sibellicu
Your "references are s**t
My references are from God
FIN
gorilla199 1 year ago
@gorilla199 There is a big difference between Richard Dawkins and god. Richard Dawkins exists. We can see pictures of him and videos. I have never seen any proof that god exists. I would prefer if you would stop saying that the credibility of one of my favorite authors as you say s**t. I don't care that you preach you nephilim fantasy but please and see reptilians and freemasons everywhere. Just don't bring sane people into you problems with your brain. Don't call me a freemason, because i'm not
ninjakitty1753 8 months ago
@ninjakitty1753
You say Richard Dawkins exists?
Prove it
gorilla199 8 months ago
I think some geology lessons are needed...
PinkSoap44 1 year ago
Where is part 2?
luretrash31 1 year ago
where is part 2 of this video?
xxx3ddi3xxx 1 year ago
hmmm u kno 2 disregard the obviose asteroid crator n the gulf of mexico that radio carbon dating has placed it @ rufly 65,000000 yrs ago is mad and 2 say that given reference 2 the bible they made no statement of ther being any kind of "giant reptiles" 4 noah 2 choose from leaves me 2 think ur a looney that needs 2 read a whole hell of alot more
corjomo 1 year ago
I was wrong about Jasher saying Enoch died. Apparently it was a typo error I saw. Sorry.
Charlamane100 1 year ago
So you think there is a typo on the internet page in the book of Jashur pertaining to Enoch supposedly dying? Hm. I'll check it out on other sites.
Charlamane100 1 year ago
I agree with you regarding almost everything you said. However, the Book of Jasher says that Enoch died. Now, we know Enoch went with God, he was translated. That's scriptural. So I have a hard time taking the book of Jasher seriously, because of that.
Charlamane100 1 year ago
@Charlamane100
There is a reference to Enosh and Enoch
The copies you see on the net have been transcribed so a typo or two are possible
There is no discrepancy
gorilla199 1 year ago
Each day of the Lord is of a thousand years. Did he not create the earth over billions of our years, taking seven days over this span? Was there not morning and evening created on each of those days, as during the different phases of creation were there not reformations that took place, some in Satan's rebellion of darkness, some as part of Gods creation. The word of God is in his scriptures, we pray for understanding, that THE VAIL BE LIFTED. Amen
SeekTruthinLight 1 year ago
Wow, It's just amazing how little you actually know about anything!
....I have to leave now, I'm needed in the real world!
Please don't forget you're medication.
speerdali 1 year ago
Fail at 2:40. "That means the whole Earth was under water". Fail. No that only means the bone was subjected to water. A mud puddle, a pond, a river, a swamp, a glacier, and ocean, etc. Not all bones need to be subjected to water at the same time. You could have one bone in one place covered by a swamp... which then dries up while another bone in a desert is submerged due to a melting glacier, etc.
BW022 1 year ago
Are you serious? If not I comend your acting ability, if so then I brand you totally insane and only fit to converse with chickens...............
rattlehead890 1 year ago
Not worth watching or rebutting.
TheSaturnalia 1 year ago
Not all archeoligists or Palaeontologists are freemasons. It would be next to impossible to hide fossil evidence. However I should get going becaus arguing with someone who belives in reptilians is pointless.
pezyguy 2 years ago
@pezyguy
Your right!
So take your reptilian beliefs and Hisssss off snakey
gorilla199 2 years ago
So why dont we ever see fossilized humans? The answer is that it also takes a long time for a bone to become a fossil.
pezyguy 2 years ago
@pezyguy
You wont see them because our mates the Freemason "Archeologists" hide them.
And actuall a fosillised foot wearing a modern cowbot style boot was found recently
It is on one of the YT Vids but look it up on olde news on the internet
gorilla199 2 years ago
On that matter though: do creationists actually believe plate tectonics? That theory might be destructive for your pov as the climate over a piece of land would vary depending on where on the globe it is...
TakesTwoToTango 2 years ago
So you said "I'll scientifically disprove evolution" to then shut up about evolution for the rest of your video...
Then I looked up fossilization. I don't know much of it, but there seem to be different types of fossilization, and I didn't really find the necessity for water in all of them. I did read that for what you described, water had to come into play for a short amount of time, but I don't know of pieces of land that were dry for the entire history of earth.
TakesTwoToTango 2 years ago
I can feel my IQ drop right now:O
MiuraUU 2 years ago
@MiuraUU Your IQ, most likely isnt very high, but its based on absolutely nothing. Your head is filled with federally funded lies my friend.
theoak84 2 years ago
If you believe in Noah`s Ark, you believe that god the worst MASS-MURDERER ever.
lizazoon 2 years ago
@lizazoon
Death Toll (God vs Satan)
God: 2,301,417
Satan: 10
Satan is a humanist in comparison. By the way, Al Pacino made an awesome devil. Just finished watching Devil's Advocate. Amazing guy, how could you not love him.
Chaturgha 1 year ago
@Chaturgha : Great comparison. All people have to do is reading the bible from A to Z.
lizazoon 1 year ago
Plain bullshit to keep the gullible in line.
lizazoon 2 years ago
@lizazoon Or, what you think you know, is bullshit to keep YOU in line..
theoak84 2 years ago
how can u say there is no evolution and then say there was some mutations? u know what the difference between a mutation and evolution is ?
evolution is change over a long period of time , mutation on the other han is evolution over a short period of time... if there is evolution there is mutation and if theres mutation theres evolution. make your choice
stiivertsvik 2 years ago
Find a single geologist worth his salt in the scientific community who wouldnt refute every word this man has said. You could not find one.
krustofskie 2 years ago
Wow. My problem. Yes, I suppose it is. Why so defensive? I'm simply pointing out that there were unclean beasts that entered the ark. If you are indeed reading Genesis, you can't miss it. That's why I gave you the chapter reference.
And you're not exactly being very Christ-like if that's how you respond to people. Not sure where all the anger is coming from.
liliodine 2 years ago
@liliodine
Its not you Im annoyed at
Its these Satanists who have confused everyone
gorilla199 2 years ago
Ummm...Genesis Chapter 7 describes the clean and unclean beasts that entered the ark. There are other unclean beasts besides those depicted of the dinosaurs. The other book you mention of is not in the Bible, which is not we should necessarily embrace as truth. There are other books that were left out of the Bible-for good reason.
liliodine 2 years ago
liliodine
Written by God and excluded by Devils
You dont want the whole story then that is YOUR problem
gorilla199 2 years ago
@liliodine just because the book of Jashar is not in our bible doesn't mean its not referred to.
Joshua 10:13
So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar.
if its written about in our bible, shouldn't that mean it is also holy scriptures? I think many things people cant explain about the old testament are because this book has been left out
derek0325 1 year ago
gorilla199: I started watching your vids and they're great. They're amazing. Do you embrace a certain religious belief as well? Thanks for your vids.
liliodine 2 years ago
If for a moment, we assume a more symbolic translation of Bible whereas the 6 days merely represented a passage of time too large for most people to grasp, then not only does the controversy about dinosaurs disappears, but also the controversy between the Creation story & Evolutionary Theory.
Mpryan81167 3 years ago
many tried to conform but IT'S simply not true!!! Yahweh created in 6 DAYS!!! and there is no evolution. whoever wants to believe in this lie can do. i stay in scriptures.
bieberbazzejunge 2 years ago
When you think about it, even the Big Bang Theory has everything being created from nothing. The only difference between religions view and sciences view is not how things happened, but who started it all: God or Random Chance. With the complexity of the Universe and all that is in it Random Chance looks more absurd.
Mpryan81167 3 years ago
The key controversy to this whole thing is the belief in the literal translation of the Bible where it says that God created the world in only 6 days. The scientific world says the Earth is much older. Thus this is the heart of where religion vs. science disagrees.
Mpryan81167 3 years ago
Wow, good video! Subscribed.
moby6002 3 years ago
dosent the ice age effect fossils?
zombielou 3 years ago
zombielou
There never was an "ice age"
There was a Pole Shift
You dont really think that mamoths lived in the North l do you!?
Vegitarians eat vegitation, not snow.
The "ice age" is a lie!
gorilla199 3 years ago
Actually mud can turn stuff into fossils too, so can ice, and amber, the La Brea Tar Pits have/had lots of fossils and many imprints from carbon are found the continents. Also the continents were shaped differently which would cause water to be in different areas which redneck trucker explains good. If you respond give an answer not beating around the bush saying that it's devil science.
uberownagemonkey 3 years ago
To: uberownagemonkey
You assume too much!
Yes Mud (silt) can fossilis bone.
Amber encapsulation is not fossilisation.
Tar Preservation is not fossilisation.
The continent were the same shape always - There was a Pole SHift
Nibiru is coming to shift the poles again
gorilla199 3 years ago
but what about the evidence found in tree rings and the high water levels, and evidence in the soil of an ice age.
please dont take my questions the wrong way im just curious
zombielou 3 years ago
Tree rings are a scientific fact
High water levels prove Noah's Great Flood
Evidence in the soil of an ice age is rubbish!
The poles shifted so what was tropic soil became north pole soil and vis a vis
Wht "ice age"???
gorilla199 3 years ago
what about the waves that appear to have been flash frozen in mid air in the arctic?
GENERAL1002 2 years ago
To: LargeFishBeast
You will be more than paranoid when Jesus gets back mate!
Mixing what God made with rubbish that Fallen Angels made is not Truth, it is an Abomination.
God has NOTHING to do with lies!
gorilla199 3 years ago
Pope Benedict XVI said the debate raging in some countries — particularly the United States and his native Germany — between creationism and evolution was an "absurdity," saying that evolution can coexist with faith.
The pontiff, speaking as he was concluding his holiday in northern Italy, also said that while there is much scientific proof to support evolution, the theory could not exclude a role by God.
So which group is the pope a secret member of that's hiding the truth?
Paranoid much?
LargeFishBeast 3 years ago
To: vendetta1066
If you believe you evolved from a chimp then thats up to you
gorilla199 3 years ago
In the King James version of the Bible, Noah is instructed to bring 2 of every Unclean animal and 7 of every Clean animal and birds. All land masses of this planet have been underwater at one time or another, the dinosaur bones that you reference are not in a uniform layer of sediment. They are spread out over millions of years of geological time and show a progressive evolution of life on Earth. No book can possibly be more convincing than proven scientific fact.
rednecktrucker1969 3 years ago
To: rednecktrucker1969
I agree
God made proven science
Fallen Angels made the science you speak of though
Whats proven about that "science" is that is also proven, but as a lie.
gorilla199 3 years ago
To: Ravindra9689
All Archaelogical digs are Government run
If you listen to John F Kennedy's speech about the worldwide conspiracy involving Government, Science etc you will realise that human bones are found but it is keep nice and quite from you.
gorilla199 3 years ago
Theory: Dinosaurs must've been from Nibiru!? O:
LeoKinoske 3 years ago
So, the conditions were right for extremely rapid, geologically layered fossilization during Noah's flood. Neat! Specifically, which of the millions of animal species present on the earth were on the ark and which are post flood mutations? What about plants? How long did it take to gather all the non-aquatic plants? Or did they manage to just get seeds... and spores? What did everything eat for that week? To where did the water run off? I have so many thoughts on this!
odge99 3 years ago
Read the Book of Jasher
You wont need to wonder why because all the answers are in there
gorilla199 3 years ago
Thank you sir! I downloaded a pdf version. It didn't answer any of my questions but it is very interesting. Now I have more questions. Who is the real originator of this book and where did he get this information. Why is it not a part of the recognized bible or discussed more among Christians? Is this the same book of Jasher mentioned in Johua and Samuel II? ...and another thing: isn't calcium already a rock? Just a thought.
odge99 3 years ago
1. If the Book of Jasher didnt help you then neither can I.
2. The originator of the Book is God, just like all Scripture.
3. It's not recognised because the Satanists who worked alongside Constantine kept it out s that the number of Books in the Bible would be 66 (a Satanic number)
4. Yes it's the same Book mentioned in Joshua and 2nd Samuel
5. Re: Calcium already being a rock (Science pages can be found on Google)
A copy of the Book of Enoch will fill in the blanks a bit more for you.
gorilla199 3 years ago
Can you explain nylonase.
mct685 3 years ago
What a peanut
tleclark 3 years ago
Peanuts were made by God!
gorilla199 3 years ago
I hope you realize that there is water in the ground. Otherwise land plants wouldn't exist.
nin4247 3 years ago
nice one-
God bless
jonbob100 3 years ago
I believe you're right...and this is the first time I heard explanations about fossils...well, I look forward to the next part..
aldrin051088 3 years ago
Thank you for your rudness.
The new strains of bacteria you speak of are geneticaly modified in laboratories Your arguement is therefore invalide.
gorilla199 3 years ago
(2 Samuel 1:18)
"Is it not in the Book of Jasher"
(Joshua 10:12-13)
"as it is written in the Book of Jasher."
The Book of Jasher is Bible!
gorilla199 4 years ago
it was also once believed that the earth was the center of the universe and more locally the sun orbited the earth. until the church was disproved and reluctantly accepted that fact. just give it time
supalo0pa 4 years ago
The whole world including "science" and the "churches" are run by Satan
There is no truth to be expected from either of the sources you quote.
Jesus is coming back
Thats the only time Im waiting for
gorilla199 4 years ago
lol, how funny, science is controlled by the devil...oooooo
lordbyrne 4 years ago 2
Thats correct, Satan runs everything here on Earth. God said so, it's in the Bible
gorilla199 4 years ago
if the devil runs everything on earth (science and the churches), and the bible is on earth and was writen by the men who founded the churches,then would it not follow that the bible is the work of the devil? i know you'll say no its not but how do you know?
vejbok 4 years ago 2
Your words are work of the Devil!
Proverbs 12:8
A man will be praised according to his insight, But one of perverse mind will be despised.
See also 2 Peter 16
This foretells the disaster coming upon people with warped minds (like you) who twist the Scriptures
Best you close your mouth and repent.
gorilla199 4 years ago
hahahahaha! looks like someone woke up on the wrong side of the church, hahahahaha!
dgat213 3 years ago
evolution is real, bacteria and virii become resistant to antibiotic and antiviral medication by changing their dna in response to, to put it simply, being killed by these chemicals.
supalo0pa 4 years ago
DNA only changes by scientific interference
Its called biological warefare.
The work of the Devil.
gorilla199 4 years ago
It is true that there has to be some kind of submergence or flood to soak the bone in order to begin the process of fossilization, but it does not mean that there was a single large catastrophic flood. The fact is, there were possibly many floods at different parts of the world, at different periods of times. The so called evidence you presented does not strictly (without contradiction) lead to the conclusion that God deemed the dinosaurs as unclean, nor does it disprove evolution.
xawesomexelix 4 years ago 2
Evolution has NEVER been proved, therefor there is nothing about evolution to disprove.
gorilla199 4 years ago
This is a huge misunderstanding of how fossils are formed. The calcium in bones don't necessarily TURN into rock, but rather minerals are absorbed into the bone and over time the minerals replace the bone. Essentially, then the bones can be said to be turned to stone, but not the calcium.
xawesomexelix 4 years ago
Thats what I said isnt it?
gorilla199 4 years ago
Actually, fossils on mountains can be explained by tectonic activity. Two plates meet, force up a large section of earth and create a mountain range. Better explanation than believing in a book of fairy tales.
hitman3005 4 years ago
So according to you all the mountains suffered tectonic actiity underwater.
Well thats still underwater isnt it?
gorilla199 4 years ago
and how the hell do you know that Noah himself said that -.- HELL even soz ;>
hardhouse333 4 years ago 2
Your a Satanist (says so on your channel).
I dont answer to satanists!
gorilla199 4 years ago
Wow! That makes alot of sense. Everywhere on earth are rocks and that means dinosaurs were everywhere and they were unclean, so that they could not be on the ark. Then the whole earth flooded and killed all dinosaurs, which became rocks
baleheads 4 years ago
Became FOSSILS!
gorilla199 4 years ago
But i have a feeling the so called Loch ness Monsters or plesiosaurus type creatures did not die as they were aquatic in the first place and when it flooded it did not affect the aquatic monsters only the land monsters so the plesiosaurus monsters did not evolve, they could still be alive today known as the loch ness monster
baleheads 4 years ago
Crocodiles didnt die either.
But NOTHING evolved.
There is no such thing as evolution, it simply is impossible to probve because there is absolutely no evidence of evolution. Tere is only evidence that evolution cannot possibly be. Each creature has its own flesh.
If an elephant used to be a fish it would still have the flesh of a fish. Apes and humans have different fleash and so does every creature. Just as God said.
gorilla199 4 years ago
It's amazing isn't it! God's creation. Beautiful and diverse. Praise God Amen
baleheads 4 years ago
Interesting information about the formation process of fossils. Assuming it is correct, that still does not disprove the theory of evolution or the possibility that different areas were under water at different times....I'm looking forward to watching the next video to see where yo are going with this.
sorefish 4 years ago
No one needs to "disprove" evolution.
Evolution is impossible to prove therefor what need is there to disprove it!?
Evolution has no scientific credibility it is only a theory and even Darwin who came up with the theory repented of it on his death bed. Good ideo considering he was about to meet The Creator.
gorilla199 4 years ago
Flesh NOT made by God is flesh which is a mixture of animals, animals & humans, fallen angels and humans/animals/plants etc.
The contexts of Hebrew word meanings and contexts, like Greek, are different from English. They have dual meanings and contexts.
Dinosaurs were created by the fallen angels by mixing animals. Monsters like half man half horse, Dinosaurs etc were all their work and they did this to vex God (Book of Enoch)
gorilla199 4 years ago
i actually think they were made when man was made but ok w/e but you also teach from the book of enoch but the bible also say you cannot add or take away from the bible so it could be considered a manuscript not a book of the bible
BrooklynGemini 4 years ago
Exactly!
So consider that both these books are mentioned in the Bible and also a whole quote from the Book of Enoch is in the Bible.
Plus both give Glory to God.
The Son of Man particularly revered.
Looks like they have been taken away!
gorilla199 4 years ago
ok cool
BrooklynGemini 4 years ago
What about Genesis 7:2?
"Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate"
datr89 4 years ago
Yes thats the basis of the video.
gorilla199 4 years ago
I meant in reference to the reason you give as to why the dinosaurs died out. Supposedly because they were unclean and so were not allowed on to the ark - if I understood you correctly. But according to Genesis 7:2 the unclean animals were brought onto the ark just not in as great a number.
datr89 4 years ago
That aspect of "unclean" refers to animals fit to eat or for Sacrifice.
Noah was chosen because he was of "pure Stock" (human stock). The same applies for the animals God made "Each of their own kind" (refers to their flesh as every animal on Earth, regardless of DNA "similrities" has its own particular flesh.
Any flesh not made by God is "Unclean" in the sense that it is an Abomination.
gorilla199 4 years ago
Would not dinosaurs fit into one of those categories though? They're either fit to eat or sacrifice or they're not? And so would be taken aboard the ark?
I'm also unclear what would constitute flesh not made by God.
datr89 4 years ago
I worked in publishing for over 20 years.
NOTHING you are told is real.
gorilla199 4 years ago
Why are there no human fossils?
Censeo 4 years ago
Actually there are!
Take a look at the st.birgitta videos. There is a partially fossilised human foot - still wearing a cowboy boot.
Work that one out!
gorilla199 4 years ago
Is the relation of discovered dinosaur fossils and human fossils an indication of the quantities of both species related to one other when the flood came?
Again, why have we found practically no human fossils?
Censeo 4 years ago
Of course human fossils have been found, one of them wqas wearing a cowboy boot Fossils of Giants have also been found. A part fossilised tyranosaur bone with marrow and blood cells has also been found.
As for indicative quantities: How could I possibly know, do you know?
The only trustworthy indication would be in the Holy Scriptures.
gorilla199 4 years ago
No, the trustworthy is not the Holy Scripture which is a giant axiom. Science tries to use as few axioms as possible... you know like "things we experience can be studied in order to understand truth" which in itself can't be proven, but it seems reasonable to start from there and not from scripture when it comes to setting valid axioms.
Censeo 4 years ago
Darwin confessed Jesus Christ when he was dying. So he renounced his own theory when it was time to meet the Almighty.
Science continually changes "it's" mind as to what science's so called truth is. Science is governed by politics, politics exclude God.
God will exclude science because He made the rules of physics etc and what He says goes.
Unlike science God's Word never changes.
gorilla199 4 years ago
"Darwin confessed Jesus Christ when he was dying. So he renounced his own theory when it was time to meet the Almighty."
I do not know if you laid out a truthful premisse here, because I've heard rebuttals on the topic. If it is true, nevertheless, that is illogic reasoning unless all people who believe in Jesus Christ as saviour also disbelieve evolution theory. And that is not the case.
Censeo 4 years ago
Why have I never read in any of my science magazines of these giant fossils? I've only seen pictures of them on creation pages. Science don't ignore findings like that. Science are after the truth, no matter what the truth is.
Censeo 4 years ago
If you like science magazines you could ask yourself why my hypothesis on the Mig Foxbat was published word for word by the BBC FOCUS Magazine with someone elses name on the credits. As for pictures, forget magazines, look on the net. Science does not involve Truth. Science can be a label for any hypothesis true or false or an axiom even.
gorilla199 4 years ago
You can find a lot of pictures on the net that claims to be related with reality, but in fact is not. A science magazine don't use photoshop and claim it is an original picture. That is likely to happen on the internet however.
As for your article, that sounds awful. Hope you find the time to sue their asses off.
Censeo 4 years ago
"that's the only way fossils can form" No, landslides, mudslides, volcanic eruptions, shallow water deposition and sedimentation are the most common sources of fossilized remains, i think even in that order.
claschxtreme 4 years ago
fossils on mountians : dosen't mean all the earth was under the water at the same time
Danmill23 4 years ago
Ok...What does it mean then?
aethiops007 4 years ago
Well it means simply that ALL the fossils in the world do not HAVE to be created AT the same time BY a single event.
The sea floor can rise up and become a dry mountian top. Brining it's fossilised fish, shells, etc with it.
Danmill23 4 years ago
Good Video.
ThecomebackKid1968 4 years ago
Let me know when you find a giant human fossil.
AbbeyNormal 4 years ago 2
Honestly who told you this this stuff about fossils? who did you hear it from? haha look up the word, " bias " in the dictionary before you put all your faith into what your told.
ge0metr1x 4 years ago
is this guy for real? sounds like all his science knowledge from a preacher trying to keep the sheep in the herd. HAHA dude your a sheep and your spiting something it is completly untrue man. Well if you believe the fairy tail of the bible you'll believe antying your told so im not surprised. Open your eyes and shed your wool my fellow man, do not be one of the brain washed masses of bible zealots, look to the new info, the bible is ancient and archaic written by man. wake up sir.
ge0metr1x 4 years ago 2
you do not need water to make a fossil!! only minerals from the earth! that is totally twisting the facts, asfor a flood the size as described in the bible it would jst scatter the bones not bury them
Erech01 4 years ago
yes, you viewof evlutin is clearly wrong, frogs and gorillas are modern animals as we are, we did not evolve from the goillas you see today, we evolved from a similar speices to all the great apes, and i dont think it was a frog, more likly a mammal
Erech01 4 years ago 3
Take a look in the Book of Jasher!
You will see that "Neanderthal man" was in fact a group of people (Tower of Babel) who planned to kill God. Their punishment was that God made them take on the appearance of apes. Other he made take on the appearance of Elephants. Theres your "missing link" and also the Indian Elephant "god" man.
gorilla199 4 years ago
ok then, once youcan find me the garden of eden, the tower of babel(which as he bible describes it is huge so you cannot miss it) ad yo can explain to me when all the water for a flood that size came to and left, and then you explain to m why we share over 98% of our genes with the great apes
Erech01 4 years ago
Hypothesis, Theory, Law. It's called the THEORY of Evolution because it can't be proven. Evolutionist love to call Creationists stupid while they present a Theory as a Law. I takes as much faith to be an Evolutionist as it does to be a Creationist. They are both Theory's in the strictest scientific sense.
Tuvoc310 4 years ago
Tuvoc: I don't love calling Creationists stupid...
whirlpoolzend 4 years ago
Excellent, keep up the good work!
Tuvoc310 4 years ago
what you mean evolution never happened!! its still happening! evolution did not finish with us, we are not a climax of evolution, we as humans are still evolving, our backs ae still getting straight as r our legs, evolution does happen and is still happening all living things ar evolving, if mutation and natural selection are true then evolution must be in some way
Erech01 4 years ago
wat you mean evolution never happened!! its still happening:/ it never stopped
Erech01 4 years ago 3