To all aforementioned "Wonder if enemy combatants still have these" comments, the stingers given to them in the 80s would be useless now, their batteries haven run out.
Replacing them wouldn't be possible without the use of a factory and they can't be recharged. The batteries run out after three years. If any aircraft are being shot down by portable AA missiles, it's something from the old Soviet Union.
CON ESAS ARMAS MATARON A LOS SECRETARIOS DE GOBERNACION EN MEXICO, EL NARCO LOS CONSIGUIO POR QUE ESTA HACIENDO JUSTICIA A LOS POBRES Y DESFAVORECIDOS DEL SISTEMA, EXISTEN MUCHOS DESEMPLEADOS Y ELLOS ESTAN A FAVOR DE QUE LOS GRINGOS NO HAGAN COSAS QUE NO EN TERRITORIO MEXICANO, VIVA MEXICO
@marinesallday; weapons are always updated with new technology, the stinger in MW2 is the FIM 92 F, it uses new guidence systems, a "passive" infared seeker, its "passive" because it doesnt emit radar wave in order to "see" its target
The stinger was given to the afgans by the US during the cold war so these would use against the soviets they were fighting against. They took down many Soviet planes...
The US never saw coming that the weapons and training they gave the afgans would come back and bite them in the ass 20 years later huh?
@neocomp92 Actually, it probably was. The Stinger came on to the scene around 1981, but was never actually used in combat until 1986 by the CIA backed mujahideen forces fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. Luckily for NATO and ISAF, the Stinger hasn't resurfaced in recent years, else everybody would have given up on the war shortly after it began.
Just think if I had one of these on September 11..... wait ....why was there not one at the white house/capital/pentagon/trade centers ? We new in 1993 trade center was attack.. o well in 2 million years when a new species replaces us they be like, i wonder why the did not have meteorite defense, they new a meteorite kill the dinosaurs, o well there death brought about our evolution.....
@super00su If they'd had air defences at the world trade center those planes would have come raining down over a large portion of Manhattan, possibly even causing more damage than what was done. A large number of people would have been killed anyway.
@draale but the towers would be there, i think what is more plausible is we could have had stingers out side of the island on cost guard ships, but there is no way would have been ability to find out that they were going to fly in the build before we could have shoot them down, so it dose not matter the towers were coming down that day, the only thing that could have stopped was better intellectual. If you remember they had hummer with stingers missiles post out side of DC after 9/11.
@super00su All of the aforementioned (except the world trade center) are armed with AA/AG countermeasures. They just didn't deploy them for issues of collateral damage.
@randomgamerdude9 How does this teach anyone how to use a stinger? It's just information ON the stinger. Knowing what it can DO doesn't teach you how to use it. ;)
i know its a surface to Air missle, fo use against air vehicles, but could you shoot it at a ground target? i know it wouldent be effective or anything, but if push comes to shove could you shoot it at a ground target?
hey dude, I'm pretty sure you're basing that statement off of this video from almost 30 years ago. It's not the same missile anymore. You can put on in a fast mover's cockpit from over 3 miles. If it's loaded in an SVML you can use the common air picture and engage at more than 15k. FIRST TO FIRE
yeah it has. I re-classed in 06 and it's changed a lot since then too. The Stinger is almost phased out. There is an interim weapon system called CRAM but it's not mobile. They've been testing a short - mid range replacment since about 02 but nothing yet. STRIKE FAST KICK ASS
thats awesome but the russian and iranian built ones seem to be more effective. thats just my opinion but in the end the both can fuck a plane up. The Russian one is called:9K38 Igla and the iranians one developed in 2005 is called: Misagh 2
Lmao I looked up 打飛機.
WuntonNoodles 1 week ago
old strela shoot down f16 in iraq and have only 2000m range
TATARSTAN59500 3 weeks ago
sweeeeeeeeeeet!!!
mahis83 4 weeks ago
sold in ebay!!!
smkn11mlg 1 month ago
To all aforementioned "Wonder if enemy combatants still have these" comments, the stingers given to them in the 80s would be useless now, their batteries haven run out.
SaturnVII 2 months ago
@SaturnVII there not so stupid that they wouldn't just recharge them or attach other battery's
1ukjunglednbraver 2 months ago
@1ukjunglednbraver
Replacing them wouldn't be possible without the use of a factory and they can't be recharged. The batteries run out after three years. If any aircraft are being shot down by portable AA missiles, it's something from the old Soviet Union.
SaturnVII 2 months ago
CON ESAS ARMAS MATARON A LOS SECRETARIOS DE GOBERNACION EN MEXICO, EL NARCO LOS CONSIGUIO POR QUE ESTA HACIENDO JUSTICIA A LOS POBRES Y DESFAVORECIDOS DEL SISTEMA, EXISTEN MUCHOS DESEMPLEADOS Y ELLOS ESTAN A FAVOR DE QUE LOS GRINGOS NO HAGAN COSAS QUE NO EN TERRITORIO MEXICANO, VIVA MEXICO
savemexico1 2 months ago
latest stinger have minimal more range than igla-s
but igla-s is faster and caused more damage
in 2002 chechen fighter shoot down mi-26 !!!!!!! with igla-s
and hugo chavez have sa-24 america has concerned but when farc aquered sa-24 lol ! very big problem
TATARSTAN59500 3 months ago
Snaaaaaaaaake!
wildwarren 4 months ago
noobs on real life black ops 2:05
tyrant234 4 months ago
Finally a easier remedy for those goddamn Apaches on Battlefield
DopeBoyMagic66 5 months ago
S.T.A.R.S
stephencarlmagno 7 months ago
@marinesallday; weapons are always updated with new technology, the stinger in MW2 is the FIM 92 F, it uses new guidence systems, a "passive" infared seeker, its "passive" because it doesnt emit radar wave in order to "see" its target
1980sDiscoMullet 9 months ago
If this missle launcher is so old, why do they put it in "modern warfare" 2
marinesallday 9 months ago
@marinesallday oldies but goodies!
gps93 7 months ago
@marinesallday The AK-47 is at least 60 years old, way older than the stinger, correct?
lolvks 4 months ago 2
@lolvks yes
maskaryan 3 months ago
The guy at 2min in was the way Manpads used to be... and maybe still is.
asusmobo123 10 months ago
The stinger was given to the afgans by the US during the cold war so these would use against the soviets they were fighting against. They took down many Soviet planes...
The US never saw coming that the weapons and training they gave the afgans would come back and bite them in the ass 20 years later huh?
VisionextBCN 10 months ago
Was this done in the cold war days?? Coz this guy rings anti-soviet thruout this promo vid
neocomp92 1 year ago
@neocomp92 Actually, it probably was. The Stinger came on to the scene around 1981, but was never actually used in combat until 1986 by the CIA backed mujahideen forces fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. Luckily for NATO and ISAF, the Stinger hasn't resurfaced in recent years, else everybody would have given up on the war shortly after it began.
EIephunk 1 year ago
@EIephunk if iran ever gets around to reverse engineering their stockpiles the coalition forces are in a fucking HEAP of trouble
dgabbless 11 months ago
@EIephunk stinger was used in combat in the faulklands, by british sf m8t. ;-)
tett2000 5 months ago
Just think if I had one of these on September 11..... wait ....why was there not one at the white house/capital/pentagon/trade centers ? We new in 1993 trade center was attack.. o well in 2 million years when a new species replaces us they be like, i wonder why the did not have meteorite defense, they new a meteorite kill the dinosaurs, o well there death brought about our evolution.....
super00su 1 year ago
@super00su If they'd had air defences at the world trade center those planes would have come raining down over a large portion of Manhattan, possibly even causing more damage than what was done. A large number of people would have been killed anyway.
draale 1 year ago
@draale but the towers would be there, i think what is more plausible is we could have had stingers out side of the island on cost guard ships, but there is no way would have been ability to find out that they were going to fly in the build before we could have shoot them down, so it dose not matter the towers were coming down that day, the only thing that could have stopped was better intellectual. If you remember they had hummer with stingers missiles post out side of DC after 9/11.
super00su 1 year ago
@super00su All of the aforementioned (except the world trade center) are armed with AA/AG countermeasures. They just didn't deploy them for issues of collateral damage.
HuntHawaii808 2 months ago
You know the guy @ 1:56 is totally pro.
Jedi2155 1 year ago
best weapon :D
swtrooper11 1 year ago
'
this american stinger missiles can target, hit, destroy many ussr russia helicopters alot
bestamerica 1 year ago
Akimbo rapid fire stingers with holographic sights
iTzzEuphoriaaaaaa 1 year ago
Tss, that's just standard home security...
OMFGWTFLOLZ100 1 year ago
1:12 that it's just sick.
Megamichael214 1 year ago
youtube... teaching the next generation of kids to use surface-to-air missile launchers
randomgamerdude9 1 year ago
@randomgamerdude9 How does this teach anyone how to use a stinger? It's just information ON the stinger. Knowing what it can DO doesn't teach you how to use it. ;)
Jetman123 1 year ago
I take this camping with me no midges can get me now!
spartin5600 1 year ago
i'm gonna kill annoying flies with it
MasterPotatoChiep 1 year ago
I have that in my garden,nobody flys over my garden ;D
TheLacune 1 year ago
I would take S-400))) LOL
kibabiba 1 year ago
2:07 holy fuck that sure packs a punch! lol real life call of duty :D
Metalsonic2008 2 years ago
i know its a surface to Air missle, fo use against air vehicles, but could you shoot it at a ground target? i know it wouldent be effective or anything, but if push comes to shove could you shoot it at a ground target?
BurroBurrito1 2 years ago
ya you can as long as it emits enough heat.
immortal4942 2 years ago
@BurroBurrito1 there is only one way 2 find out
killman369547 1 year ago
I would love to purchase one.Or at least an SA-7 "Grail".When I was serving in the NZ Territorials we had useless French Mistral SAM systems.
fixdeluxe1 2 years ago
hey dude, I'm pretty sure you're basing that statement off of this video from almost 30 years ago. It's not the same missile anymore. You can put on in a fast mover's cockpit from over 3 miles. If it's loaded in an SVML you can use the common air picture and engage at more than 15k. FIRST TO FIRE
RED2mac 2 years ago
wow,things have changed since i was a gunner ..got out in 87.If it flies it dies!
rgd82abn 1 year ago
yeah it has. I re-classed in 06 and it's changed a lot since then too. The Stinger is almost phased out. There is an interim weapon system called CRAM but it's not mobile. They've been testing a short - mid range replacment since about 02 but nothing yet. STRIKE FAST KICK ASS
RED2mac 1 year ago
thats awesome but the russian and iranian built ones seem to be more effective. thats just my opinion but in the end the both can fuck a plane up. The Russian one is called:9K38 Igla and the iranians one developed in 2005 is called: Misagh 2
zizzy007 2 years ago
35 pounds!!! that freaky light!!
WARFARENINJA 2 years ago
MANPADS!! name fail lol =P
crisisrun 2 years ago 2
are these stinger the same with the SAM sites?
goonegel 2 years ago
a stinger has only 1 shot,the chance isvery small that you will hit a jet plane,the have flair defence.
MrProset 2 years ago
does airplane pilot hear warning sound when he is aimed from SA?
realIBeliX 2 years ago 2
No, but as soon as the missile is laucned, the airplanes censorc pick it up and warns the pilot.
sotemot 2 years ago
Its a single missile shot per holster or whatever they call it right?
holyclericz 2 years ago
yh its disposable so i think its 1 shot per launcher
manervic 2 years ago
This is my home defense.
seinfeldfan411 2 years ago 30
@seinfeldfan411 Get very many black helicopters?
tweedlebeetles 1 year ago
so is going 1 on 1 with an atack chopper an act of suicide?
manervic 3 years ago
No, especially if they fly over and you get them from behind. Infantry are hard to see if they're hiding under trees and not in the open.
gosciu555 3 years ago
ye but if they know where u are and all u got is an rpg7 and 5 rockets?
manervic 2 years ago
But its not an rpg but a missile. Yeah obviously if they know where you are, you're pretty screwed unless you got good cover and conceilment.
gosciu555 2 years ago
what but takin on a tank 1 on 1 with no missle rpg exc al u got is frag grenades n a block of c4 and 1 smoke grenade could it be done?
manervic 2 years ago
no if you have played metal gear solid released to playstation.
ARSA525 2 years ago
yh but thats snake who could take on a giant nuke armed walking tank anyway?and take out a tank with grenades
and ive ony played part of mgs1
manervic 2 years ago
Solid Snake is epic man. ;P
fxc2 2 years ago
but solid snakes snake is not solid
manervic 2 years ago
where can i get one of this stinger?
kingtiger0147 3 years ago
lol
sixtymetal 2 years ago
this would be useful taking out the commercial aircraft which pass over my house!
kjb86 3 years ago 34
terrorists in iraq did this to an DHL airplane
sixtymetal 2 years ago
@kjb86 except those fly high enough to be out of range..
Mr00Ted 3 months ago
HOLY SHIIIIIIT
fffdsdfsdfsd 3 years ago