I was there recently...ill share soon what I caught. I got some interesting EVP's and also some Q and A responses that are just a little unusual being the circumstances and the exact grave I happened to be in front of. We are still working on our Goldfield Hotel footage so this will be up after.
@deathandroses13 Sometimes it get's plain wacky there, others not so much. Our most recent 2 trips were eventful. In June we accidentally caught EVPs on our radio show mic. The show is recorded by a 3rd party, and we found the EVPs later. Same night our skeptic Perry caught a full figure in a photo. July trip 3 of us witnessed 3 to 5 little gray cavorting figures run across the cemetery, just feet away. Nobody was there with us.
@MrFlibertigibit could well be in a normal circumstance, but Justin hadn't set the camera for any longer exposure than needed to gather the picture, it being about 3:30 PM, and there was more than enough light for this high end digital to do it's job. The "ghosts watching" snap was taken much later and in near full dark, and no "fog." Nor was flash used.
@claranormaldotcom You don't need that much light at all with a DSLR - you just ramp up the exposure, so you can get quite a bright photo even in near darkness if you set it up correctly. I'm not convinced. :P
@MrFlibertigibit lol, it matters little to me, convincing people, as I was there and actually know the circumstances of the photography.
The camera was new to Justin when he got it from his buddy and we initially threw the first "fog" photo out ourselves, but on revisiting both the photo and the site, (1 block from my house) and being unable to duplicate it with this camera, in was re-included. If you visit at the right times, you'll see things like this in person. I have.
@DarkChaosj LOL, re reading it only poses a question: So, you're saying we deliberately took photos out of focus so that later we could alter them? And in that vein, I also have to ask if you actually looked at them. Which photos are out of focus?
All visual anomalies shown are due to the property and the things extant on this property, not bad photography. Try going there in the late afternoon early evening. That's when this place gets plain weird.
@DarkChaosj Nope, none are altered DarkChaosj, and we have the originals to prove it, but we do thank you for paying close attention to detail, or attepting to at any rate. We have never altered a photo except to lighten or sharpen them, or to outline an interesting feature. There is nothing to gain by altering photos, and that has been our mantra since the very beginning.
I was there recently...ill share soon what I caught. I got some interesting EVP's and also some Q and A responses that are just a little unusual being the circumstances and the exact grave I happened to be in front of. We are still working on our Goldfield Hotel footage so this will be up after.
deathandroses13 5 months ago
@deathandroses13 Sometimes it get's plain wacky there, others not so much. Our most recent 2 trips were eventful. In June we accidentally caught EVPs on our radio show mic. The show is recorded by a 3rd party, and we found the EVPs later. Same night our skeptic Perry caught a full figure in a photo. July trip 3 of us witnessed 3 to 5 little gray cavorting figures run across the cemetery, just feet away. Nobody was there with us.
claranormaldotcom 5 months ago
I was there recently...ill share soon what I caught
deathandroses13 5 months ago
SLOW the F down!!!
Crazychriscrum 10 months ago
Fog on photos caused by longer exposure with any camera, bad try
MrFlibertigibit 1 year ago
@MrFlibertigibit could well be in a normal circumstance, but Justin hadn't set the camera for any longer exposure than needed to gather the picture, it being about 3:30 PM, and there was more than enough light for this high end digital to do it's job. The "ghosts watching" snap was taken much later and in near full dark, and no "fog." Nor was flash used.
claranormaldotcom 1 year ago
@claranormaldotcom You don't need that much light at all with a DSLR - you just ramp up the exposure, so you can get quite a bright photo even in near darkness if you set it up correctly. I'm not convinced. :P
MrFlibertigibit 1 year ago
@MrFlibertigibit lol, it matters little to me, convincing people, as I was there and actually know the circumstances of the photography.
The camera was new to Justin when he got it from his buddy and we initially threw the first "fog" photo out ourselves, but on revisiting both the photo and the site, (1 block from my house) and being unable to duplicate it with this camera, in was re-included. If you visit at the right times, you'll see things like this in person. I have.
claranormaldotcom 1 year ago
@DarkChaosj LOL, re reading it only poses a question: So, you're saying we deliberately took photos out of focus so that later we could alter them? And in that vein, I also have to ask if you actually looked at them. Which photos are out of focus?
All visual anomalies shown are due to the property and the things extant on this property, not bad photography. Try going there in the late afternoon early evening. That's when this place gets plain weird.
claranormaldotcom 1 year ago 2
@DarkChaosj Nope, none are altered DarkChaosj, and we have the originals to prove it, but we do thank you for paying close attention to detail, or attepting to at any rate. We have never altered a photo except to lighten or sharpen them, or to outline an interesting feature. There is nothing to gain by altering photos, and that has been our mantra since the very beginning.
claranormaldotcom 1 year ago
i wanna go there.
19steph83 2 years ago 6
It's beautiful there, but sometimes it gets plain weird.
claranormaldotcom 2 years ago