Ok, so I have posted 3 comments giving the thumbs down, yet this has not changed the 100% thumbs up rating. Methinks now that the 350 or so views before mine were probably by a single individual, to give an impression of being popular (just like earlier, when giving the impression of having a PhD, when he did not.) Credibility has sunk even lower.
Furthermore, trained scientists would never make claims (as this self-proclaimed "biochemist" does) that doing a trial on a particular population of miners would "guarantee" publication. (How embarrassing, that he does not even know that evaluation of research is based on scientific merit, not on personal notions of popular appeal.)
His wording is at best shady and deceptive, and seems likely to be based upon... business greed.
Furthermore, trained scientists would never make claims (as this self-proclaimed "biochemist" does) that doing a trial on a particular population of miners would "guarantee" publication. (How embarrassing, that he does not even know that evaluation of research is based on scientific merit, not on personal notions of popular appeal.)
His wording is at best shady and deceptive, and seems likely to be based upon... business greed.
100% of raters liked this clip (until now) - yet not one of them ever bothered to comment? This is very suspicious indeed....
But there is another, more serious, credibility problem. The speaker says elsewhere that "I conducted my PhD research for Duke University..." Of course, most people would take that to mean that he completed a PhD. But if he did, you can be sure he'd be calling himself Dr Deitsch - but he does not. So it means he started a PhD - and flunked out.
Ok, so I have posted 3 comments giving the thumbs down, yet this has not changed the 100% thumbs up rating. Methinks now that the 350 or so views before mine were probably by a single individual, to give an impression of being popular (just like earlier, when giving the impression of having a PhD, when he did not.) Credibility has sunk even lower.
Banana27ification 6 months ago
Furthermore, trained scientists would never make claims (as this self-proclaimed "biochemist" does) that doing a trial on a particular population of miners would "guarantee" publication. (How embarrassing, that he does not even know that evaluation of research is based on scientific merit, not on personal notions of popular appeal.)
His wording is at best shady and deceptive, and seems likely to be based upon... business greed.
Banana27ification 6 months ago
Furthermore, trained scientists would never make claims (as this self-proclaimed "biochemist" does) that doing a trial on a particular population of miners would "guarantee" publication. (How embarrassing, that he does not even know that evaluation of research is based on scientific merit, not on personal notions of popular appeal.)
His wording is at best shady and deceptive, and seems likely to be based upon... business greed.
Banana27ification 6 months ago
100% of raters liked this clip (until now) - yet not one of them ever bothered to comment? This is very suspicious indeed....
But there is another, more serious, credibility problem. The speaker says elsewhere that "I conducted my PhD research for Duke University..." Of course, most people would take that to mean that he completed a PhD. But if he did, you can be sure he'd be calling himself Dr Deitsch - but he does not. So it means he started a PhD - and flunked out.
Furthermore, trained sci
Banana27ification 6 months ago