Its shameful that two people such as yourself would be fighting like this on a video about such a delicate subject. Little sickening if I am honest. You are both as bad as eachother... This is a good scene and well done for its time!
A great Aussie series for an Aussie like myself, of course the Professionalism and the organisation of the troops is superb, they trained them well. Thanks shannon858 for the upload mate.
@TASHKENTGOATMAN i find that very hard to belive.. you will find the Diggers who fought in ww1.. were sons of first generation brits.. but they grew up in australia and had aussie accents. dont ever say anything like that again.. that is disrespecting australia and what we did in ww1.
@TASHKENTGOATMAN got a problem that im at school aye?.. WHAT WOULD YOU KNOW?? look at the country your from!.. my fucking great great uncle was in ww1 and he had an aussie accent.. and so did the men in his platoon. you have descraced australia and what we have done in ww1.. go away you troll.
@TASHKENTGOATMAN why do you mock me?.. i could be 6 foot bulky as.. and its spelt "mum" dickface.. oh no i swore please dont tell mum.. she wouldnt care that a low life faggot on the internet who thinks that the AUSTRALIAN SPEAKING diggers of ww1 are brits.. so fuck off you excuse for a person.
@TASHKENTGOATMAN it may be a fact! but its not factul! and its only diesrespecting the way you say it.. you come on here thinking you know everything.. somethings are just better not said! OK!
@TASHKENTGOATMAN and so what if i hate america.. whats it to you? nosie pom.. that cunt that you keep talking about with 'Australian war diarist BEAN' did you relise he was a pom? fuckface
@TASHKENTGOATMAN what case?.. your the "twat".. coming on to an AUSSIE! vid an start claming that they arnt australians.. fuck off cunt go back to your fucked up country dont try to take and CREDIT of what the australians didnt in ww1 go crawl back under your bridge.. or i might go tell your mum your being an imature little 'know it all' cunt bag!
@TASHKENTGOATMAN They were Australians..im not douting they are Australians....but they were born in Britain...They were Brits that became Australian,,so by that fact i was watching Australians attacking the Broosdine ridge in the Ypres salient...but British born Australians......ladyboy
@TASHKENTGOATMAN a picture says a thousand words ,,and iv seen yours....dont be ashamed...you are what you are...or is that Parental input as well...is that why you hate the world ....come out young ladyboy...
@TASHKENTGOATMAN you must study the wrong things or just dont pay attention! why would you think that these guys would speak pom?.. when they were clearly born in australia and grew up in australia! your the dumbest cunt.. this is an aussie vid! why do you think there are aussie in it? HUH! know it all? fuck off
@TASHKENTGOATMAN and thats very rasist..' i wasnt watching Kangaroos hoping about or abos in the outback'.. and there you go.. you said it your self "was watching the Australians attacking the Broosdine ridge in the Ypres salient"!!!!!!!! SEEE! you stuffed your self up there cunt
Actually australians were british colonists who migrated to the island for new imperialism. Australia was actually first used as a british prison before the colonists decided to move over. It was an ideal location to keep prisoners because there was no escape from the island. So in the end australians are just british descendants and they only call themselves different. The real australians are the natives already on the island.
@jpawn67 actually my decendants werent british, they were irish, and just because my decendants were from another country, doesnt mean i am not a real australian, douchebag
ddid youse know that more than 1000 russians were in gallipoli and more through out the war pretty amazing that full blooded russians wanted to fight under the Australian flag respect to the russian comrades
@Smalbop I meant Australia, we where part of the commenwealth we had to protect our mother country. If you have different opinions on the matter then so be it.
@Smalbop lol I say you're an ignorant twat to say such a thing. Australia joined the war freely in support of mother britain. Being the fact that most australians were british themselves and was part of the british dominion more commonly known as the commonwealth realms. Same story with new zealand and canada mate.
The "Motherland" wasn't threatened at all. And the fact that all the ANZACs were volunteers and no one was forced to join the war in Europe remains a fact, no matter what you think you "know" about history or politics and no matter what you call me. :-)
@Smalbop "And the fact that all the ANZACs were volunteers and no one was forced to join the war in Europe remains a fact"
dont u mean it remains a fallacy
the treaty of london is the reason why the "the motherland" joined the war. And it's been an old treaty since 1839. And australia gained their independence from britain in 1901 but still felt connected to britain and therefore they supported them . It's not what I think I know...it's what I do know...not as ignorant as some on here :-)
No, I meant that no one of them was forced. Maybe they still felt connected to Britain but, as you said, this was just a feeling - and not a duty. So far for fallacies. And such old treaties, you know: Britains remembered them as long as they fitted into their concept of worldwide hegemony. WW1 was not in favour of Belgium but in favour of the Empire's economy and science which was about to be left behind by Germany.
@Smalbop Australia was part of the british dominion and the germans caught up with the science again to rebuild and reshape their military system right through the 1930s and through ww2.
aussie schools are that shit we only learn about anzacs for 1 week of the year in april and it is exactly the same every year galipoli simpson and his donkey which one of my teaches thought galipoli was normandy when she said galipoli campiagn was in that movie saving private ryan i put here in here place this series should be played to every school hell its fucking shameful especially when our aussie kids think america saved us and we did nothing because they say some bullshit hollywood movi
'Couldn't leave ya hangin' there, you haven't paid me for that luger yet'...LOL the Aussie way...even in adversity...humour is never lost...we can find jokes in all situations especially the tough ones, which is why we don't give a fuck what anyone thinks. this quality with the ANZACS then is the same as NOW, the only problem is that now political correctness has taken over so it's now getting watered
ANZAC legacy is being watered down you mean? If so I know what you mean. It is the same here in Canada. The feats of the Canadian Corps (similar to those of the Australian Corps) are largely forgotten. We learned next to nothing about it in school. American and British history and Canadian politics. Whoopee. There is nothing wrong with abhorring violence - every sane individual does - but if we do not know history we WILL repeat it. Plus WWI was THE event which built both nations.
@repitorio. ANZACs; f***king oustanding soldiers in two World Wars and still today - canucks too. ...and an excellent demo of some superb small unit tactics. Unfortunately, I think all the Commonwealth forces are slowly being written out of both world wars (Brit's too) - mainly because of our 'Socialist' school carriculums and Hollywoods depiction of WW2 being soley a US effort. Someone needs to make a historically accurate big budget blockbuster of El Alamien, or Jacksons Dam-Busters remake.
I've got to say the Australians have certainly changed since 1917-18.Now when I walk around western Sydney it seems somehow that the Australians have transformed,like Micheal Jackson,and now appear to be brown and black and yellow and it makes me wonder if the Anzacs would have more in common with the Germans they were fighting the the Australians of today.
Turkey troops fought fearlessly in çanakkale. this flmler sided and ridiculous. enemy forces retreated like a coward dog Long live fully independent turkey.
The troops at Gallipoli werent fighting for Turkey but for the ottoman Empire. It is only because of the defeat of the Ottomans in ww1 that Kemal Attaturk comes to prominance. Attaturk's excellence in the 1920s Suez Crisis gave you your independance.
Your views on hisory are laughable.
Also this clip is in Europe.
The Scenes in Gallipoli are not about the politics of the war but about the experience of soldiers who get caught up in war.
fp470 you clearly dont know nothing about Turkish soldiers they killed the crap out of your well equipped soldiers and helped the surrendered enemies and healed them.I dont know whatever you read about Turks but surely you read it half wrong .Turkish soldiers did not surrender! The cowards were the biritish and the street dogs coming before them.those coward british pushed anzacs forth so they wont get shot ...
If you want to learn something read what the british commanders said about the war.
The Ottoman_Turk Soliders were average soldiers, some good some bad. The Ottoman Empire had extreme problems training and fielding an army. I never said they did not help wounded persons they capture. However there were numerous examples of mass surrenders by the Ottoman forces in the Sinai, Palestine, Iraq, trans-Jordan. At Gallipoli being on the defensive there was less chance for capture and surrender.
The British, French and Anzacs as well as Ottomans were quiet brave all round.
Turks won at gallipoli because the Imperial Forces landed at the wrong beach, had the operation gone accordingly, the campaign would not have lasted long. In terms of gallipoli, you'll find that the Turks actually lost more soldiers to the Australians & Billy Singh bested the Turkish #1 Sniper. Also, I think its worth noting that the 800 Light Horse obliterated Turkish lines at Jerusalem.
So in terms of training, yes Turks were on a lower level.
@DivineHardOn no dont give me excuses if so caled imperial forces landed in Gallipoli then if they were the so called strongest army of that time how come they could not defeat bunch of soldiers these are lies these are the lies of British that has been taught to world since a long time. well if we wrote how many british and australian #1s we eliminated it would make a book so you kill once in 500 years and write it everywhere you can. you exterminated alot of people and you dont say anyofthem
@DivineHardOn about the retreat in Jerusalem British was defeated twice by the outnumbered and outgunned Ottoman soldiers then after those defeats British attacked for a third time with an amount around 100000 against less than 20000 Turkish soldiers and they retreated while fighting they did not surrender nor got crushed and British established israel in there and that is the current trouble in the middle east. Now you British have messed the world up but it will all turn back at you one day
@looktoward Well do you not look stupid for your misinformation. The army that landed at Gallipoli was not thw world strongest army and never claimed to be. The three divisions that land at Gallipoli were; understrenght, poorly trained and poorly equippped. The Ottoman forces had amble warning of the coming attack for just over a month and LIman Von Saunders prepared death trap defences and actually just outnumbered the attacking forces. It was a failed operation from the outset
@fp470 of course Turks knew that British was coming but before British landed they heavily bombarded the shore for days.brtisih bombarded so heavily that around 4000 misiles landed per square so if you compare these thosedeath traps are nothing.in themiddle east british army made 11000 Turkish hostages blind and Turks healed any enemy soldier they found laying injured. there was an Australian captain he was saved by a Turkish soldier after the battle he became a governor and he thanked Turks.
@looktoward The bombardment was reported to have had minimal affects on the Ottoman positions and at Cape Helles the bombardment was very light. They were not the best equipped army, I do not know why you think that. Treatement of prisoners was always good by the Ottomans compared to others, true!.
@looktoward ....artillery advantage and a superiorituy in heavy machine guns ground 2nd Gaza to a standstill. The British frontal attack on Gaza in the 3rd Battle was held up by the Yilderim's defence of the town. The Ottomans were good soldiers too but the Germans gave them a number of very dangrous weapon advantage, the British had more supplies to sustain an attack though-but the desert meant that this advantage was moot.
@looktoward This is my question to you @looktoward, do you think that British Success was entirely down to outnumbering the Ottomans or was it because the British under a new Commander devised a better plan?
Keep in mind Ottoman Artillery advantage
The fact an attack can only operate for one day due to theirst
and that the Ottomans had reinforcements because their defensive features were sufficenitly manned?
@fp470 1-Ottomans were less and poorer in terms of equipment but had artillery and British was better equipped and outnumbered the enemy and they had artillery in their positions too. 1st and 2nd batlles were won by the Ottomans but the 3rd batlle was ended with the Ottoman soldiers retreating and British won. Outnumbering was surely a crucial fact but not the only reason of victory you had a good commander and unfortunately the Ottoman army was not commanded by an Ottoman commander.
@looktoward The Ottomans in the 1st Battle lost the fight but won the battle because the British could not occupy the position. Many Ottoman units had fled and were defeated. After the British withdrew they just re-occupied the positions and improve them. THe Ottomans in 2nd Battle won because they outgunned the British and the British Plan was bad. In the third Battle was a deciviseve British victory based on the command. Von Kressenstein was a good General do not disrespect him
@fp470 the Germans affected the Turkish plans and made them attack as they wanted (like the bombardment of Odessa) because some of their generals controlled some Turkish armies.British retreated because they gave heavy losses too. The British were repelled there was a fight but Turks didnt lose it. They were ordered to be pulled back becasue the enemy was too much in number. I didnt insult him but since it is a defeat in the end he had to be accused at some point.
@looktoward The British did not withdraw at Gaza 1 due to heavy losses. At Gaza 2 they did. At Gaza 1 the British won all the tactical engagments they entered into, but had no way of occupying the position. Kressenstein then ordered counter attacks in the night which demoralised the British forces greatly as they fell back to the Wadi Ghuzze.
How about a new debate?
What do you think about Von Kressensteing Defence of Gaza in 2nd Battle of Gaza?
@fp470 as a result of counterattacks British couldnt occupy so they were forded to retreat. They didnt want to give heavy losses. VonKressensteing wasnt bad he had emplaced machine gunners and positioned soldiers he intended to resist them he tried to defend it well but looks like Edmund Allenby had better tactics and surely more soldiers. I had an Australian English teacher he was a trained soldier before he said that British conscrpted Australians to fight.
@fp470 if you notice in the Ottoman army only Turks were fighting with a few Germans (neglecting the artillery since artillery doesnt work in melee combat.) and with a possiblty of a few Arabs joining them.In the British army Britsh, Australians, and New Zellandian soldiers were fighting together this increased the number of soldiers in British army. British sent them mostly before the actual British soldiers what do you think.
@looktoward The artillery and German machine guns DOmatter alot. For the most part the British did not have as large guns as German's at Gaza and at 2. Battle of Gaza this proved a massive problem. The hand to hand fighting was not as prominent along the whole line. Also the British and colonial forces would fight at same time, only some British volunteer units were sent in last because they were reserve. Also Australia never had conscription but we volunteered. Allenby probably was better
@fp470 Generals have great effect on battlefield but the first two wars were a victory of Ottoman soldiers with a small effect of general. The third war was lost because British was better improved there was a matter of tactics too.the result is clear 3 battles were fought Ottoman heroicly won the first two and the thrid battle was lost. This meant that Ottomans retreated. What is the result . British is not stupid to take Jerusalem and pull others` attention over there.So they put israel there.
@fp470 why did british attack there and give the land to israel. they said israel didnt have a land and plaestine didnt have a nation so the out isreal there and that is now the result that causes terror and war in the middleeast.israel doesnt listen to UN israel doesnt care because it knows that nobody will touch them. Now all the world has to stand against them they are messing the world.
@looktoward The Ottoman forces were turned back time and time again. The only time they managed to hold their ground was 2nd Battle of Gaza with help from the Yilderim and Pasha II group of German troops and German trained troops. You are attempting to conflate two very different phases of the Meditaranian theatre- do not do this it make you look foolish. The Allenby army and the army under Hamilton are miles apart in terms of ability, equpiment and composition.
@fp470 you are the foolish and the stupid here information you give is half wrong in 1st and 2nd battles of Gaza britsh retreated even so they had the better equipped and bigger army dont give the succes to germans helped us but Tukish soldiers fought more if you want to know about our experiences go and search history if you are interested in history you must know that military experience is trasnferred from generation to generation in a nation.
@looktoward I never said 1st and 2nd battle of Gaza were a success. Now I said in relation to Gallipoli/Cannakale campaign British were poorly equipped (Hamilton Army), but in Egypt& Palestine British army was better equipped to a point. THe 1st battle of Gaza was a tactical success but the victory could not be held, despite British forces actually entereing the town, the commanders still ordered the occupation/attack broken off due inability to hold.
@looktoward The 2nd battle was a complete failure, I agree. What i content is that at the 1st Gaza the Ottoman and British forces were roughly equal, the British did outnumber but not significantly. THe battle was a near success and the Ottoman position was routed, but there was no way to exploit the gain and occupy the town despite British forces being in the town.
@looktoward At the Battle of Gaza, 1,2 +3 (Beersheba) the Ottomans were outnumbered but there are things to remember.
1. In 2nd and 3rd BattlesOttomans were heavily dug in, with redoubts, some barbed wire and trenches.
2. The Ottomans thought they had enough men in their line to allow a whole cavalry division to stay in reserve as well as many Ottoman infantry brigades, to reinforce weak points.
3. The Germans gave the Ottomans one massive advantage- artillery advantage....
fp470 you clearly dont know nothing about Turkish soldiers they killed the crap out of your well equipped soldiers and helped the surrendered enemies and healed them.I dont know whatever you read about Turks but surely you read it half wrong .Turkish soldiers did not surrender! The cowards were the biritish and the street dogs coming before them.those coward british pushed anzacs forth so they wont get shot ...
If you want to learn something read what the british commanders said about the war.
can't think of anything worth fighting for in Turkey.I do want to find the johnny Turk who hacked into my email account and punch him in the face, but apart from that nothing-even your football teams are crap
@helmethead72 - They were fighting to captures the Dardanelles, and thus have a shipping line to Russia so that they could supply Russia and help them in the war effort. It was also a diversion from the Western Front, which had long since ground into a stalemate.
@helmethead72 When i went to i saw where they fought from and it was fucken hard arse country and hats off to both sides a stupid war fought bravely on both sides.
when we were there galatasry beat liverpool i think it was oh how did we celabrate 2001 i think
Johny turk and i and my kiwi mate drank that night away ANZACS live on
For anyone having a go at the french give it a rest. They died just as beautifully as the men of any other nation in the name of......? At least they had the sense to mutiny in 1917, refusing the prevailing officer code that headbutting machine guns was the path to victory.
@patyboomba - Sense to mutiny? Are you joking? That wasn't sense at all. Alot were shot for it. If they had any sense at all they would have kept fighting and died with honour.
You are an idiot. They were given much better conditions because of the mutiny.
So dying in sensless droves would of been sooooo much better. People who think like you do, in an old, out of date, archaic sense of the honor abd beauty of war appall me.
Its this image of the Great War that we never see. Why do we think its trench ladders and machine guns mowing down infantry between 1914-18 when in 1916 these style attacks became the norm?
But alas we will explain this away as the Aussies being intrisnically better soldiers despite everything about them in this scene is due to the British mililtiary system; weapons, training, company size, iniative reward, etc.
Oh and same for Canadians, Rhodesians, South Africans and of course UK forces.
So true, all the other Commonwealth Forces inc. the UK did well also, simply through desperation. They had to show initiative just to finish the whole bloody show. They had enough. The Americans where enthusiastic because they where new.
What are you trying to say. I cant interpret your statment very well. Also no nation was intrinciscally cowardly, France suffered with the same stoic attitude as the rest of the nations. If your trying to say I thini the Aussies are good because they are Australian I am not saying that.
no im saying the anzacs were good because we only had 5 % of the allies and took 20% of the land and were known as tough soldeirs aswell as the candians
fuck were good fighters but with that many metros we are piss weakpeople compared back then lol could u imagaine metros wearing pink camo because of the fasion and afraid of getting muddy since saying that are soleiders are tough as nails i just had metros
Donno54, are you proud of calling German people by a derogatory term? If you are then I'm not sure what kind of hatred you must bear for Germans, but it greatly disturbs me.
i think Donno54 is just referring to the Germans as they were referred to throughout this series and throughout the war, doesn't mean there is any hatred
The Germans hated fighting the Australians but for the most part they respected them. If the German did not respect the Digger he was in for a bad surprise - or at least a worse surprise. I respect all Australians and Kiwis.
@Number7smokesForEver what the hell are kiwis? i think you dont mean the fruit and also not the bird so witch faction are kiwis o.0? tell me please its interesting
@LegendOfJomtein Cheers geeza contray to what some think we don't hate the poms. We just love hating the poms or the kiwis for that matter as you guys take as it is intended. in good nature.
was down in jomtien last week live up in Bangkok now. Cheers mate
its a series - try typing in anzacs the series into google - it came out ages ago, and as yet, not released on DVD, unless u in oz and a big Paul Hogan fan
this was a brilliant series. we could never understand why it wasn't repeated more in England. It hasn;t aged at all. Well recommended with some up and coming aussie stars.
This has been flagged as spam show
the diggers became masters of raiding & reconnaisance throughout the great war and well into the second.
liverpoolmatt87 1 month ago
Comment removed
liverpoolmatt87 1 month ago
i was considering watching this series and i was wondering if there were just australians in this series or if there are new zealanders too
BossHossGT500 2 months ago
Its shameful that two people such as yourself would be fighting like this on a video about such a delicate subject. Little sickening if I am honest. You are both as bad as eachother... This is a good scene and well done for its time!
yay12399 2 months ago
Anzacs. Heroes one, heroes all. The services that you have performed to the Commonwealth will never, ever be forgotten.
KoMmIzZaR98 5 months ago
jhfgjsdjsfj
tyrantbad 6 months ago
"Raus, raus you bastards! Raus!"
HenryvKeiper 6 months ago
RIP Jon Blake. This was one of your best efforts.
bigmaxy07 8 months ago 3
That MG is a terrible shot...
Voss2120 9 months ago
@Voss2120 Hard to be really accurate when theres 30-40 rounds hitting that whole very few seconds...
silverfencer 8 months ago
seriously? 5 dislikes?
FearlessTim9 9 months ago
Comment removed
FearlessTim9 9 months ago
A great Aussie series for an Aussie like myself, of course the Professionalism and the organisation of the troops is superb, they trained them well. Thanks shannon858 for the upload mate.
TheSamfred20 9 months ago
British Born Australians? My great grand uncle was at the Battle of Broodseinde, and he was born in Sydney.
caz4777 10 months ago
man watching this makes me want to play company of heroes online
Terrareaperx 10 months ago
@HavocProductions1943 @TASHKENTGOATMAN could you two kind of like shut the fuck up ?
fuilly1 10 months ago 2
@fuilly1 settle down cunt.. let them fight like retards
LYNCHIE1011 9 months ago
no need to be rude those people cant help there disadvantage,,,unlike you ladyboy
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN haha nice one.. that really hurt!!! HAHA! "ladyboy"..
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@HavocProductions1943 fuck your a funny cunt! haha
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN you might wanna think of some new things to say.. or are ya that repetitive? :) HAHAHAHAH!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
well act like it....
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN well.. NO! haha
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
i love the look on the machine gunner's face XD
ktockly 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 1 year ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 1 year ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN i find that very hard to belive.. you will find the Diggers who fought in ww1.. were sons of first generation brits.. but they grew up in australia and had aussie accents. dont ever say anything like that again.. that is disrespecting australia and what we did in ww1.
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN got a problem that im at school aye?.. WHAT WOULD YOU KNOW?? look at the country your from!.. my fucking great great uncle was in ww1 and he had an aussie accent.. and so did the men in his platoon. you have descraced australia and what we have done in ww1.. go away you troll.
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN why do you mock me?.. i could be 6 foot bulky as.. and its spelt "mum" dickface.. oh no i swore please dont tell mum.. she wouldnt care that a low life faggot on the internet who thinks that the AUSTRALIAN SPEAKING diggers of ww1 are brits.. so fuck off you excuse for a person.
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN it may be a fact! but its not factul! and its only diesrespecting the way you say it.. you come on here thinking you know everything.. somethings are just better not said! OK!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN and so what if i hate america.. whats it to you? nosie pom.. that cunt that you keep talking about with 'Australian war diarist BEAN' did you relise he was a pom? fuckface
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN what case?.. your the "twat".. coming on to an AUSSIE! vid an start claming that they arnt australians.. fuck off cunt go back to your fucked up country dont try to take and CREDIT of what the australians didnt in ww1 go crawl back under your bridge.. or i might go tell your mum your being an imature little 'know it all' cunt bag!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN WTF CUNT! THESE ARE AUSSIE GET IT IN YA DUMB FUCKING SKULL! IF THESE WERE STUPID POMS THEY WOULD ALL BE DEAD!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN you seem to know allot about "gaylady boys" and "gays".. what do you study on them too?
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN They were Australians..im not douting they are Australians....but they were born in Britain...They were Brits that became Australian,,so by that fact i was watching Australians attacking the Broosdine ridge in the Ypres salient...but British born Australians......ladyboy
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN a picture says a thousand words ,,and iv seen yours....dont be ashamed...you are what you are...or is that Parental input as well...is that why you hate the world ....come out young ladyboy...
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN hahah changing the subject when i just owned your dumb cunt pommy arse! haha suck a fat one.. From australia
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago 4
@TASHKENTGOATMAN and good job on reply to your self you loner motha fuka!! :DD
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago 2
@HavocProductions1943 im gonna be like you and reply to my self... that TASHKENTGOATMAN is a bit of a fuck head aye?
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago 2
@HavocProductions1943 yeah he is a bit of a dill.. he should go check on his goats before they get away..
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago 2
@HavocProductions1943 HAHAHAH! fuck your funny.. haha
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@HavocProductions1943 hahah thanks! :DDD
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@HavocProductions1943 ...Its like talking to a five yearold
TASHKENTGOATMAN 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN welll to bad... im 15 :DD
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN its like talking to a.. retard!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@HavocProductions1943 HAHAH thats funny as!..
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN you must study the wrong things or just dont pay attention! why would you think that these guys would speak pom?.. when they were clearly born in australia and grew up in australia! your the dumbest cunt.. this is an aussie vid! why do you think there are aussie in it? HUH! know it all? fuck off
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN and thats very rasist..' i wasnt watching Kangaroos hoping about or abos in the outback'.. and there you go.. you said it your self "was watching the Australians attacking the Broosdine ridge in the Ypres salient"!!!!!!!! SEEE! you stuffed your self up there cunt
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
@TASHKENTGOATMAN aussies are fucking supermen cunt.. the brits are useless in battle! thats a fact!
HavocProductions1943 11 months ago
fucking germans
D87pnoy 1 year ago
@D87pnoy you fascist
1987jkilla 1 year ago
Actually australians were british colonists who migrated to the island for new imperialism. Australia was actually first used as a british prison before the colonists decided to move over. It was an ideal location to keep prisoners because there was no escape from the island. So in the end australians are just british descendants and they only call themselves different. The real australians are the natives already on the island.
jpawn67 1 year ago
@jpawn67 actually my decendants werent british, they were irish, and just because my decendants were from another country, doesnt mean i am not a real australian, douchebag
eliafell 1 year ago
@jpawn67 actualy ever ones a migrant at some stage. they say that every one migrated from africa tens of thousands of years ago.
Kokoda144 1 year ago
ddid youse know that more than 1000 russians were in gallipoli and more through out the war pretty amazing that full blooded russians wanted to fight under the Australian flag respect to the russian comrades
Eshayzbra96 1 year ago
Comment removed
TASHKENTGOATMAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TASHKENTGOATMAN read it on my channel or look it up
Eshayzbra96 1 year ago
can i find this in better quality?
SlyDragoon16 1 year ago
all men are brothers,
sooner or later u meet a enemy who look exactly like u n then what do u do.
hlimkb 1 year ago
anzacs are some of the best troops in the world. we dont have a huge army but we have a highly trained army.
mgollow 1 year ago
this is ww2 right?
bloodshot16 1 year ago
@bloodshot16 No its WW1!
fp470 1 year ago
@bloodshot16 WWI mate
kris7drums 1 year ago
First of all they were fucking idiots to fight in a war which wasn't theirs.
Smalbop 1 year ago
@Smalbop You mean the ANZACS? we had to fight because we where still part of the english commenwealth. We where not idiots!
MrSlroyboy 1 year ago
@MrSlroyboy
Every single soldier of the ANZAC was a volunteer. No one "had to" fight in WW1.
Smalbop 1 year ago
@Smalbop I meant Australia, we where part of the commenwealth we had to protect our mother country. If you have different opinions on the matter then so be it.
MrSlroyboy 1 year ago
@Smalbop lol I say you're an ignorant twat to say such a thing. Australia joined the war freely in support of mother britain. Being the fact that most australians were british themselves and was part of the british dominion more commonly known as the commonwealth realms. Same story with new zealand and canada mate.
matt2house 1 year ago
@matt2house
The "Motherland" wasn't threatened at all. And the fact that all the ANZACs were volunteers and no one was forced to join the war in Europe remains a fact, no matter what you think you "know" about history or politics and no matter what you call me. :-)
Smalbop 1 year ago
@Smalbop "And the fact that all the ANZACs were volunteers and no one was forced to join the war in Europe remains a fact"
dont u mean it remains a fallacy
the treaty of london is the reason why the "the motherland" joined the war. And it's been an old treaty since 1839. And australia gained their independence from britain in 1901 but still felt connected to britain and therefore they supported them . It's not what I think I know...it's what I do know...not as ignorant as some on here :-)
matt2house 1 year ago
No, I meant that no one of them was forced. Maybe they still felt connected to Britain but, as you said, this was just a feeling - and not a duty. So far for fallacies. And such old treaties, you know: Britains remembered them as long as they fitted into their concept of worldwide hegemony. WW1 was not in favour of Belgium but in favour of the Empire's economy and science which was about to be left behind by Germany.
Smalbop 1 year ago
@Smalbop Australia was part of the british dominion and the germans caught up with the science again to rebuild and reshape their military system right through the 1930s and through ww2.
matt2house 1 year ago
/watch?v=G-gmv17urnk for full anzac ep 1
anzacseries 1 year ago
aussie schools are that shit we only learn about anzacs for 1 week of the year in april and it is exactly the same every year galipoli simpson and his donkey which one of my teaches thought galipoli was normandy when she said galipoli campiagn was in that movie saving private ryan i put here in here place this series should be played to every school hell its fucking shameful especially when our aussie kids think america saved us and we did nothing because they say some bullshit hollywood movi
Henza9218 1 year ago 2
@Henza9218 maybe we should learn more english spelling and comprehension in school?
camhiggins1 1 year ago
@camhiggins1 dude i have a bit of dislexia history is more important any way
Henza9218 1 year ago
Quality....thanks for bringing this back after so many years.
ryan3571 1 year ago
'Couldn't leave ya hangin' there, you haven't paid me for that luger yet'...LOL the Aussie way...even in adversity...humour is never lost...we can find jokes in all situations especially the tough ones, which is why we don't give a fuck what anyone thinks. this quality with the ANZACS then is the same as NOW, the only problem is that now political correctness has taken over so it's now getting watered
down.
repitorio 1 year ago
@repitorio
ANZAC legacy is being watered down you mean? If so I know what you mean. It is the same here in Canada. The feats of the Canadian Corps (similar to those of the Australian Corps) are largely forgotten. We learned next to nothing about it in school. American and British history and Canadian politics. Whoopee. There is nothing wrong with abhorring violence - every sane individual does - but if we do not know history we WILL repeat it. Plus WWI was THE event which built both nations.
Number7smokesForEver 1 year ago
@repitorio. ANZACs; f***king oustanding soldiers in two World Wars and still today - canucks too. ...and an excellent demo of some superb small unit tactics. Unfortunately, I think all the Commonwealth forces are slowly being written out of both world wars (Brit's too) - mainly because of our 'Socialist' school carriculums and Hollywoods depiction of WW2 being soley a US effort. Someone needs to make a historically accurate big budget blockbuster of El Alamien, or Jacksons Dam-Busters remake.
constablenapweed 1 year ago 2
I've got to say the Australians have certainly changed since 1917-18.Now when I walk around western Sydney it seems somehow that the Australians have transformed,like Micheal Jackson,and now appear to be brown and black and yellow and it makes me wonder if the Anzacs would have more in common with the Germans they were fighting the the Australians of today.
zombiekiller117 1 year ago
Proud to be Aussie and greetings to our fellow Turks
fpvshitsonhsv 1 year ago
thatnx mate were there for the empire
wiltal09 1 year ago
i respect the australians and the kiwis that faught in ww1 because the made our world peaceful
gooogooogooogooogooo 1 year ago
they would warn each other about attacks
stusurf1 1 year ago
All these years later this series is still great. Paul Hogans best movie role.
DINGOBOY71 1 year ago
Turkey troops fought fearlessly in çanakkale. this flmler sided and ridiculous. enemy forces retreated like a coward dog Long live fully independent turkey.
hkaragoz 1 year ago
The troops at Gallipoli werent fighting for Turkey but for the ottoman Empire. It is only because of the defeat of the Ottomans in ww1 that Kemal Attaturk comes to prominance. Attaturk's excellence in the 1920s Suez Crisis gave you your independance.
Your views on hisory are laughable.
Also this clip is in Europe.
The Scenes in Gallipoli are not about the politics of the war but about the experience of soldiers who get caught up in war.
fp470 1 year ago
As for cowardness. The Ottoman-Turk's peformance in the rest of the war does a pretty good job.
Your armies broke time and time again, mass surrenders by Turkish troops were common from late 1916.
Your forces retreat to the Syrian Border and were bracing for an invasion of anatolia when the Ottoman Regime surrenders.
fp470 1 year ago
fp470 you clearly dont know nothing about Turkish soldiers they killed the crap out of your well equipped soldiers and helped the surrendered enemies and healed them.I dont know whatever you read about Turks but surely you read it half wrong .Turkish soldiers did not surrender! The cowards were the biritish and the street dogs coming before them.those coward british pushed anzacs forth so they wont get shot ...
If you want to learn something read what the british commanders said about the war.
looktoward 1 year ago
The Ottoman_Turk Soliders were average soldiers, some good some bad. The Ottoman Empire had extreme problems training and fielding an army. I never said they did not help wounded persons they capture. However there were numerous examples of mass surrenders by the Ottoman forces in the Sinai, Palestine, Iraq, trans-Jordan. At Gallipoli being on the defensive there was less chance for capture and surrender.
The British, French and Anzacs as well as Ottomans were quiet brave all round.
fp470 1 year ago
@looktoward
Turks won at gallipoli because the Imperial Forces landed at the wrong beach, had the operation gone accordingly, the campaign would not have lasted long. In terms of gallipoli, you'll find that the Turks actually lost more soldiers to the Australians & Billy Singh bested the Turkish #1 Sniper. Also, I think its worth noting that the 800 Light Horse obliterated Turkish lines at Jerusalem.
So in terms of training, yes Turks were on a lower level.
DivineHardOn 1 year ago
@DivineHardOn no dont give me excuses if so caled imperial forces landed in Gallipoli then if they were the so called strongest army of that time how come they could not defeat bunch of soldiers these are lies these are the lies of British that has been taught to world since a long time. well if we wrote how many british and australian #1s we eliminated it would make a book so you kill once in 500 years and write it everywhere you can. you exterminated alot of people and you dont say anyofthem
looktoward 1 year ago
@DivineHardOn about the retreat in Jerusalem British was defeated twice by the outnumbered and outgunned Ottoman soldiers then after those defeats British attacked for a third time with an amount around 100000 against less than 20000 Turkish soldiers and they retreated while fighting they did not surrender nor got crushed and British established israel in there and that is the current trouble in the middle east. Now you British have messed the world up but it will all turn back at you one day
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward Well do you not look stupid for your misinformation. The army that landed at Gallipoli was not thw world strongest army and never claimed to be. The three divisions that land at Gallipoli were; understrenght, poorly trained and poorly equippped. The Ottoman forces had amble warning of the coming attack for just over a month and LIman Von Saunders prepared death trap defences and actually just outnumbered the attacking forces. It was a failed operation from the outset
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 of course Turks knew that British was coming but before British landed they heavily bombarded the shore for days.brtisih bombarded so heavily that around 4000 misiles landed per square so if you compare these thosedeath traps are nothing.in themiddle east british army made 11000 Turkish hostages blind and Turks healed any enemy soldier they found laying injured. there was an Australian captain he was saved by a Turkish soldier after the battle he became a governor and he thanked Turks.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward The bombardment was reported to have had minimal affects on the Ottoman positions and at Cape Helles the bombardment was very light. They were not the best equipped army, I do not know why you think that. Treatement of prisoners was always good by the Ottomans compared to others, true!.
fp470 1 year ago
@looktoward ....artillery advantage and a superiorituy in heavy machine guns ground 2nd Gaza to a standstill. The British frontal attack on Gaza in the 3rd Battle was held up by the Yilderim's defence of the town. The Ottomans were good soldiers too but the Germans gave them a number of very dangrous weapon advantage, the British had more supplies to sustain an attack though-but the desert meant that this advantage was moot.
fp470 1 year ago
@looktoward This is my question to you @looktoward, do you think that British Success was entirely down to outnumbering the Ottomans or was it because the British under a new Commander devised a better plan?
Keep in mind Ottoman Artillery advantage
The fact an attack can only operate for one day due to theirst
and that the Ottomans had reinforcements because their defensive features were sufficenitly manned?
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 1-Ottomans were less and poorer in terms of equipment but had artillery and British was better equipped and outnumbered the enemy and they had artillery in their positions too. 1st and 2nd batlles were won by the Ottomans but the 3rd batlle was ended with the Ottoman soldiers retreating and British won. Outnumbering was surely a crucial fact but not the only reason of victory you had a good commander and unfortunately the Ottoman army was not commanded by an Ottoman commander.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward The Ottomans in the 1st Battle lost the fight but won the battle because the British could not occupy the position. Many Ottoman units had fled and were defeated. After the British withdrew they just re-occupied the positions and improve them. THe Ottomans in 2nd Battle won because they outgunned the British and the British Plan was bad. In the third Battle was a deciviseve British victory based on the command. Von Kressenstein was a good General do not disrespect him
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 the Germans affected the Turkish plans and made them attack as they wanted (like the bombardment of Odessa) because some of their generals controlled some Turkish armies.British retreated because they gave heavy losses too. The British were repelled there was a fight but Turks didnt lose it. They were ordered to be pulled back becasue the enemy was too much in number. I didnt insult him but since it is a defeat in the end he had to be accused at some point.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward The British did not withdraw at Gaza 1 due to heavy losses. At Gaza 2 they did. At Gaza 1 the British won all the tactical engagments they entered into, but had no way of occupying the position. Kressenstein then ordered counter attacks in the night which demoralised the British forces greatly as they fell back to the Wadi Ghuzze.
How about a new debate?
What do you think about Von Kressensteing Defence of Gaza in 2nd Battle of Gaza?
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 as a result of counterattacks British couldnt occupy so they were forded to retreat. They didnt want to give heavy losses. VonKressensteing wasnt bad he had emplaced machine gunners and positioned soldiers he intended to resist them he tried to defend it well but looks like Edmund Allenby had better tactics and surely more soldiers. I had an Australian English teacher he was a trained soldier before he said that British conscrpted Australians to fight.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward Britain never conscripted australian soldiers to fight. Australia joined in the war voluntarily.
matt2house 1 year ago
@fp470 if you notice in the Ottoman army only Turks were fighting with a few Germans (neglecting the artillery since artillery doesnt work in melee combat.) and with a possiblty of a few Arabs joining them.In the British army Britsh, Australians, and New Zellandian soldiers were fighting together this increased the number of soldiers in British army. British sent them mostly before the actual British soldiers what do you think.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward The artillery and German machine guns DOmatter alot. For the most part the British did not have as large guns as German's at Gaza and at 2. Battle of Gaza this proved a massive problem. The hand to hand fighting was not as prominent along the whole line. Also the British and colonial forces would fight at same time, only some British volunteer units were sent in last because they were reserve. Also Australia never had conscription but we volunteered. Allenby probably was better
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 Generals have great effect on battlefield but the first two wars were a victory of Ottoman soldiers with a small effect of general. The third war was lost because British was better improved there was a matter of tactics too.the result is clear 3 battles were fought Ottoman heroicly won the first two and the thrid battle was lost. This meant that Ottomans retreated. What is the result . British is not stupid to take Jerusalem and pull others` attention over there.So they put israel there.
looktoward 1 year ago
Comment removed
looktoward 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fp470 why did british attack there and give the land to israel. they said israel didnt have a land and plaestine didnt have a nation so the out isreal there and that is now the result that causes terror and war in the middleeast.israel doesnt listen to UN israel doesnt care because it knows that nobody will touch them. Now all the world has to stand against them they are messing the world.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward The Ottoman forces were turned back time and time again. The only time they managed to hold their ground was 2nd Battle of Gaza with help from the Yilderim and Pasha II group of German troops and German trained troops. You are attempting to conflate two very different phases of the Meditaranian theatre- do not do this it make you look foolish. The Allenby army and the army under Hamilton are miles apart in terms of ability, equpiment and composition.
fp470 1 year ago
@fp470 you are the foolish and the stupid here information you give is half wrong in 1st and 2nd battles of Gaza britsh retreated even so they had the better equipped and bigger army dont give the succes to germans helped us but Tukish soldiers fought more if you want to know about our experiences go and search history if you are interested in history you must know that military experience is trasnferred from generation to generation in a nation.
Dont insult if you want a fair argument.
looktoward 1 year ago
@looktoward I never said 1st and 2nd battle of Gaza were a success. Now I said in relation to Gallipoli/Cannakale campaign British were poorly equipped (Hamilton Army), but in Egypt& Palestine British army was better equipped to a point. THe 1st battle of Gaza was a tactical success but the victory could not be held, despite British forces actually entereing the town, the commanders still ordered the occupation/attack broken off due inability to hold.
fp470 1 year ago
@looktoward The 2nd battle was a complete failure, I agree. What i content is that at the 1st Gaza the Ottoman and British forces were roughly equal, the British did outnumber but not significantly. THe battle was a near success and the Ottoman position was routed, but there was no way to exploit the gain and occupy the town despite British forces being in the town.
fp470 1 year ago
@looktoward At the Battle of Gaza, 1,2 +3 (Beersheba) the Ottomans were outnumbered but there are things to remember.
1. In 2nd and 3rd BattlesOttomans were heavily dug in, with redoubts, some barbed wire and trenches.
2. The Ottomans thought they had enough men in their line to allow a whole cavalry division to stay in reserve as well as many Ottoman infantry brigades, to reinforce weak points.
3. The Germans gave the Ottomans one massive advantage- artillery advantage....
fp470 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fp470 you clearly dont know nothing about Turkish soldiers they killed the crap out of your well equipped soldiers and helped the surrendered enemies and healed them.I dont know whatever you read about Turks but surely you read it half wrong .Turkish soldiers did not surrender! The cowards were the biritish and the street dogs coming before them.those coward british pushed anzacs forth so they wont get shot ...
If you want to learn something read what the british commanders said about the war.
looktoward 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A saga took in ÇANAKKALE TURKS SUMMER. FILMS AND THIS PARTY WAS A DOG AS ENEMY FORCES PULLING were cowards. MOST PEOPLE LIVING IN TURKEY
hkaragoz 1 year ago
what did you say??
jacobite451 1 year ago
A saga took in ÇANAKKALE TURKS SUMMER. FILMS AND THIS PARTY WAS A DOG AS ENEMY FORCES PULLING were cowards. MOST PEOPLE LIVING IN TURKEY
hkaragoz 1 year ago
aul Mick Dundee kicken ass!
Evilde4d4sh 2 years ago
and also el alamein
matt2house 2 years ago
they need to remake these movies bad.....
AdrianAwesome69 2 years ago 6
this show was a hit in Peru
eisenkreuzmusik 2 years ago 2
Ohh Sorry Chickens Try again Please Cuz Im waiting to 3. World War Comeon come here try
GallipoIi 2 years ago
can't think of anything worth fighting for in Turkey.I do want to find the johnny Turk who hacked into my email account and punch him in the face, but apart from that nothing-even your football teams are crap
helmethead72 2 years ago
@helmethead72 - They were fighting to captures the Dardanelles, and thus have a shipping line to Russia so that they could supply Russia and help them in the war effort. It was also a diversion from the Western Front, which had long since ground into a stalemate.
purplepinto 2 years ago
@helmethead72 When i went to i saw where they fought from and it was fucken hard arse country and hats off to both sides a stupid war fought bravely on both sides.
when we were there galatasry beat liverpool i think it was oh how did we celabrate 2001 i think
Johny turk and i and my kiwi mate drank that night away ANZACS live on
IndiaRshit 1 year ago
For anyone having a go at the french give it a rest. They died just as beautifully as the men of any other nation in the name of......? At least they had the sense to mutiny in 1917, refusing the prevailing officer code that headbutting machine guns was the path to victory.
patyboomba 2 years ago 3
@patyboomba - Sense to mutiny? Are you joking? That wasn't sense at all. Alot were shot for it. If they had any sense at all they would have kept fighting and died with honour.
purplepinto 2 years ago
You are an idiot. They were given much better conditions because of the mutiny.
So dying in sensless droves would of been sooooo much better. People who think like you do, in an old, out of date, archaic sense of the honor abd beauty of war appall me.
paratrooper6 1 year ago
there is no honour in war
richooo5 1 year ago
germans faced the aussies again in the second world war....at tobruk
matt2house 2 years ago
And Greece and Crete
gnarkillkicksass 2 years ago
really sad ending
colossusslayer1234 2 years ago
Its this image of the Great War that we never see. Why do we think its trench ladders and machine guns mowing down infantry between 1914-18 when in 1916 these style attacks became the norm?
But alas we will explain this away as the Aussies being intrisnically better soldiers despite everything about them in this scene is due to the British mililtiary system; weapons, training, company size, iniative reward, etc.
Oh and same for Canadians, Rhodesians, South Africans and of course UK forces.
fp470 2 years ago
So true, all the other Commonwealth Forces inc. the UK did well also, simply through desperation. They had to show initiative just to finish the whole bloody show. They had enough. The Americans where enthusiastic because they where new.
bellimbopinni 2 years ago
you cant hand out heroics fuck knuckle can you go over the top NO have a cup of cement and harden up
Henza9218 2 years ago
fp470 i respect the krauts but not the cowardly nations ie italy and france hopless
their not men in my books
Henza9218 2 years ago
What are you trying to say. I cant interpret your statment very well. Also no nation was intrinciscally cowardly, France suffered with the same stoic attitude as the rest of the nations. If your trying to say I thini the Aussies are good because they are Australian I am not saying that.
fp470 2 years ago
no im saying the anzacs were good because we only had 5 % of the allies and took 20% of the land and were known as tough soldeirs aswell as the candians
Henza9218 2 years ago
fuck were good fighters but with that many metros we are piss weakpeople compared back then lol could u imagaine metros wearing pink camo because of the fasion and afraid of getting muddy since saying that are soleiders are tough as nails i just had metros
Henza9218 2 years ago 2
Donno54, are you proud of calling German people by a derogatory term? If you are then I'm not sure what kind of hatred you must bear for Germans, but it greatly disturbs me.
tubester101we 2 years ago 2
i think Donno54 is just referring to the Germans as they were referred to throughout this series and throughout the war, doesn't mean there is any hatred
shortycate101 2 years ago
wow what prog is this? it should be shown i nthe UK good ol Aussies ,the jerries mustve hated the lot of u
donno54 2 years ago
The Germans hated fighting the Australians but for the most part they respected them. If the German did not respect the Digger he was in for a bad surprise - or at least a worse surprise. I respect all Australians and Kiwis.
Number7smokesForEver 2 years ago 15
@Number7smokesForEver
all nationals fighting against ANAZACs always said that they have a lot of respect for how hard and honorable they fought
aussiedownunderman 1 year ago
@Number7smokesForEver what the hell are kiwis? i think you dont mean the fruit and also not the bird so witch faction are kiwis o.0? tell me please its interesting
The84eRegiment 1 year ago
@The84eRegiment
Kiwi's are New Zealanders.
Number7smokesForEver 1 year ago
Australians are fucking LEGENDS ! I am a Brit saying that. ANYAussi person reading this, have a fucking great day !! Seriously!
LegendOfJomtein 2 years ago 40
I agree!!
LordGeorgeRodney 2 years ago
thanks :)
minablock 2 years ago
@LegendOfJomtein Thanx mate!
ghgjhkhnmghfgb 1 year ago
@LegendOfJomtein Cheers geeza contray to what some think we don't hate the poms. We just love hating the poms or the kiwis for that matter as you guys take as it is intended. in good nature.
was down in jomtien last week live up in Bangkok now. Cheers mate
IndiaRshit 1 year ago
watched it when i was 13 or so.. 34 now! mini series..as i had mumps and we sat and watched it all that week
chunxxxxter 2 years ago
I'm the same age and I can remember watching this as a 13 year old too. Hats off for the brave anzacs.
mcmanus800 2 years ago 2
I got the dvd got one of the bookshops to get in for if you have got a collins bookshop try there and they should get it in for you
dec211979 2 years ago
its a series - try typing in anzacs the series into google - it came out ages ago, and as yet, not released on DVD, unless u in oz and a big Paul Hogan fan
thesarge773 2 years ago
Does anybidy know the name of this serie?
ference85 2 years ago
just called ANZAC's
baskervile 2 years ago
its a movie actually not a series
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
No, it's a TV mini-series made in the 80s.
Natsukashii08 2 years ago
if u say so mate
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
it is a mini series..and was only converted into a movie later on..the movie has a lot cut out of it and is sold overseas
shortycate101 2 years ago
if its sent over seas nothin shoulda been cut they shoulda put more into it
AlienFirefox 2 years ago
respect
LukePhillipsWINS 2 years ago
this was a brilliant series. we could never understand why it wasn't repeated more in England. It hasn;t aged at all. Well recommended with some up and coming aussie stars.
ardittin 3 years ago
This looks like a good series. Where can I find it online?
RollandB 3 years ago