@templar19 Mind your own business. believe what YOU want to believe, Let others do their believing. I don't know what you believe and frankly i don't want to, But this negative tone against a group of people that doesn't have a negative tone towards yourself is childish and unprovoked. Their are more people in the world who are religious then there are people who are atheist's, So let's just get the best out of it, not hating to much Capiche.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations that have survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
DEBATE IS NOT OVER. In Darwin's time not enough science was known to refute macro-evolution. There was no understanding of genetics. Darwin thought the cell was just a simple glob. No one knew about DNA, RNA, proteins. Modern evolutionists now know, but the theory is entrenched as gospel and a lot of personal motives are at stake as well. Just saying that something evolved doesn't make it so! Schools should present both sides! Read my article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature can only work with the "cards" it has. Nature is not a genetic engineer! It can't invent new genes. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
I was brought up as a jehovah's witness and you would expect me to be a blinded fool. I found that a lot of beliefs that Christians as a whole believe are based on cultures long since forgotten. I personally don't see how a god who behaves like a child could create anything. To me, it is a myth and would compare the bible to silmarillion
@orophinellenese MonkeyMagic is the best... In the worlds before Monkey, primal chaos reigned. Heaven sought order. But the phoenix can fly only when its feathers are grown. The four worlds formed again & yet again, As endless aeons wheeled & passed. Time & the pure essences of Heaven, the moisture of the Earth, the powers of the sun & moon All worked upon a certain rock, old as creation. And it became magically fertile. That first egg was named "Thought". ............
..........Tathagata Buddha, (the Father Buddha), said,
"With our thoughts, we make the world."
Elemental forces caused the egg to hatch.
From it then came a stone monkey.
The nature of Monkey was irrepressible!
/watch?v=o3gQ65sWSS4&feature=channel_video_title
Sign up for the Church of King Monkey today and go in the prize-draw to win an official Monkey Magic bo-staff. =D..every new member is guaranteed a pair of fun Pigsey-Ears =D
As a Christian I probably shouldn't be posting this, but I DARE you to take this cartoon to a Muslim theocracy and show it. You'll probably end up in jail, getting the worst beating of your life.
what is the word that is said at 0.46 "it helps protect against .......... attacks"?.
anyway let people laugh .if i do believe in god and im wrong, then what have i lost ?.but if i dont believe in god and im wrong ,then what have i lost?
@GuitarMannnnnn yeah i know but the answer to pascals wager is,no matter what you believe youve lost nothing.if your a bad person but you "believe" then youll get into heaven..but surly good works gets you in as well without belief.if there is a heaven that is. and if there isnt a heaven then its cease to exsist.so no matter what youve lost nothing ,making pascals wager moot.imo..thats what i was trying to get at hence the question marks
Dude, no... Look Pascal's wager proposes that if you believe: you're safe no matter what moral alignment, but if you don't believe, it's a 50/50 shot. If there is a god you have everything to lose, but if there isn't; you're fine. This is a dumb argument because God would easily be able to tell if a human just believed in him to get into heaven without living a fruitful life for the glory of God. Plus, if you brainwash yourself your entire (God doesn't exist), you really lost nothing?
I don't know where you get off saying good deeds get you into Heaven, that's just not true in reality or Christianity. You're just making up your own denomination/beliefs for what you see to be fair, and the only reason you have to do that is because the penalty of sin, and the redemption/eternal torture on judgment day is already unfair to begin with. "Real Christians" (if there is such a thing) believe that Jesus is the ONLY way to Heaven. No good deeds necessary. Nub.
@GuitarMannnnnn depends on what heaven your trying to enter .and "real cristians"werent what we where talking about.but if there are/where "real" followers of the man/god jesus then it would be following his way not belief in the man /god jesus that would get you into heaven which would be more akin to the eastern philosophies which is nothing but good deeds(karma)that reaps the reward.jesus taught many things.plus you insulted so massive fail
You must not know your own basic beliefs dude. In Christianity, it's all about believing. That's all you have to do, and you're in. So what "way" of God/Jesus do we follow? Do we be kind to people like Jesus (one of my top respected idols), or do we act like God and have others killed when we do not get our way? I'd be happy to say that insulting any entity/person of such nature is, on contrary to your beliefs, a massive win. Christianity is about faith, not eastern philosophies! :P
I do believe that a truly loving and forgiving God would accept people into Heaven for good deeds, but honestly, that begs the question: Would a forgiving, loving God create hell in the first place? If he loves his creation, why does he need punishment to forgive us?
A fair, loving God would not WANT us to worry about whether we're safe or not after we die. Are not the problems in life enough turmoil for our spirit to endure? A God that would allow eternal torture for disbelieve in a far-fetched superstition is nothing but sadistic, evil, and wicked. This is another reason why Pascal's wager shouldn't even exist. You're not going to justify a God that is demented. All Gods forbid disbelief in other God's with a promise of hell. It's stupid!
@GuitarMannnnnn even if pascal's wager was justified (which as you correctly pointed out, it isn't) it's impossible. You can't force yourself to believe something if you don't. I could go on for ages about this but it would be quicker to just mention DarkMatter2525's video The Real God: An Epiphany. And a funny thng about pascal's wager is, Kirk Cameron, who uses it so much, actually said it makes you a hipocrite and that god will reject you
It just goes to show: If your only reason for believing in God is Pascal's wager, then you don't technically "believe" in your God at all. You're really an agnostic theist in disguise... haha. And if anyone resorts to using Pascal's wager to defend their beliefs, that really has something to say about how "faithful" they are.
P.S. You didn't expect any self-identified hypocrisy from Kirk Cameron, did you? Haha, it's incredible how creationists can be both funny AND annoying. XD
@GuitarMannnnnn its a pity you see jesus an as idol ,thats why your having massive problems..and isulting people who make a comment on you tube is stilla massive fail no matter how you try to spin it to make yourself feel better for being said failure
I couldn't download using any of the direct links, and I really do not use torrents for download. Is there any other option available?
Another thing, I'd really like to help and make portuguese subtitles to these videos so that they could also be available for friends of mine who doesn't speak english. How do I "assign for this mission"? lol.
R Dawkins suffers mindfucked insanity having reneged on his fundamental commitment to truth. An honest commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Subsequently dismissing God as a possibility, breaches that fundamental commitment resulting in a fatal logic error. All atheists/Satanists abandon their fundamental commitment which were wired to a lightswitch of convenience. Presented an option to deny the truth, they chose to suck a lies dick.
Is someone laughing at creationists? Why? There's a fundamental difference between a "Creationist", and a Christian. A Creationist (proponent of "Intelligent Design") may not attribute creation to The Living God responsible for it. The Christian KNOWS the truth of God's Creation by His divine wisdom, evident in every detail [that we do know] of it. Having seen Thunderf00t's series, I'm still convinced "creationists" are striking closer (and closer) to truth than Thunderf00t has done therein.
@shegb79one may be a creationist and not accept jesus as divine; however, those who do feel that jesus of nazereth was the 'savior' are by definition creationist. "The Christian KNOWS the truth of God's Creation by His divine wisdom, evident in every detail [that we do know] of it,"...i call bullshit! that's NOT a demonstration of knowledge. 2+2=4, i can show you how 2+2=4; how can you show the truth of god by his wisdom, how do you know that's his wisdom and not some pharaohs? demonstrate it!
@hoosiergambler I know at least two people who believe this universe was created. Neither of them believe in Jesus' divinity as their Saviour, King, servant, God or anything else. To them, He was a man and no more. I have no truth of my own to show you. God has already done that Himself, and I can only point to it so you can see for yourself. (Read Psalm 19: verses 1-4). If you want the Truth, look for it. I'm not trying to convert, just interested in discussion. There are good comments here.:-)
"Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link"
Really 'waketheoblivious', hummm..... some tips for your education - go to Goole, type in the below sites, search for content & start to learn..... Education is wonderful, so stop burning books and open your tiny mind......
From Wikipedia type "Timeline of human evolution"
From "Natural History Museum (UK) - Darwin Centre - Human origins""
In the side panel I can see the individual videos for 'why people laugh...' but cannot find a download option to optain them all. Is there another option / website where I can down load them in one go. Sorry if this is stupid question.
List of diabolical Frauds, presented by Satanists posing as scientists. Evolution has never provided a legitimate "Missing Link" or met the standard of irrefutable evidence.
1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Diabolical fraud.
Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth
Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils
Lucy, Manipulated Fossil, Plaster
Orce Man, 4 Mo. Old Donkey Bone
2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification
2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil
Prove it? I stated the history of diabolical fraud associated with Evolutions Hoax Piltdown Man introduced by Satanists posing as scientists. Fact, Evolution has never provided a ligitimate missing link or satisfied the standard of irrefutable evidence. Evolution is Satanic Fiction, an Evil Illusion started with a Hoax and sustained with a series of diabolical frauds.
It is this sort of blatant denial of reality that will prevent you from ever making a convincing argument to anyone with the slightest knowledge of the subject. Unfortunately for you, the research required to actually support your position would probably end up utterly destroying your faith anyway.
@waketheoblivious " I stated the history of diabolical fraud associated with Evolutions Hoax Piltdown Man introduced by Satanists posing as scientists" which is a blatent lie as the person who commited the hoax was an amateur geologist and therefore not a scientist nor posing as such
His home was filled with other manipulated fossils. He had a library of Satanic Literature and was a member of a Secret Society. He deliberately manufactured a Hoax that could satisfy irrefutable evidence and bypass schoolboard objections so science fiction could be taught as fact. A deliberate calculated manipulative Hoax that constitutes a crime against humanity, to create an Evil Illusion that to this day has NEVER PROVIDED A LEGITIMATE "MISSING LINK". An evil liar like you.
@waketheoblivious utter BS, the only rewason he did that is to gain notoriety
oh and pleased sod off with your "crinme against humanty"
And no matter how often you post something mentioning irrefutable evidence, it still never was the standard for anything that does not involve mathematics
the fact that you keep claining it is or was means you are the liar here, a liar for jebus
@waketheoblivious and he was not a scientist, he was an amateur. so no matter what you can't blame the sientist for it especially those not of GB
Next, they have not provided a legitimate missing link that suit the definition you use for it, and please do not try this crap that is comes from a reputable source as I have searched the full site of that source and your definition can not be found.
And If I can do one thing it is finding stuff on the internet
Right a amatuer scientist was able to fool the entire science community for forty years. How many times have people sold you the Brooklyn bridge? You are remarkably gullible. Are you so impressed by a lab coat that they can sell you any line of bullshit because they dress the part? If you haven't been able to figure it out your enemy is the Master of Deception, yet he played you so perfectly you think your enemy is the truth. Your preference for lazy ignorance is not surprising.
What "irrefutable evidence" did GB use in order to have begun teaching a scientific theory as scientific fact in public text books? Without irrefutable evidence Evolution amounts to science fiction and is instrumental in creating an Evil Illusion that fits perfectly with the Satanic Agenda.
@SocialDissimulation <----- Rips off the dumb like a fox costume revealing a Godforsaken Satanic Nazi who would rather operate as an evil Traitor then do the right thing. The fact is the Evolutionist/Creationist debate has long been moot. Based on reviewing hundreds of videos that dipict demonic alien life forms in the gulf, it becomes obvious Both God and Satan do exist.
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themselves fundamentally liars & frauds. When Atheist/Satanists dismiss the possibility of God, breaching their commitment to the truth, results in the mindfucked insanity, to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
@waketheoblivious I'm not dismissing the possibility of a God. I just don't believe in one because of many reasons. There isn't any good evidence for God. Sure there is evidence but it is much better explained by other things, rather than magic.
You have a degree of honesty that goes beyond many so-called Atheists. There are a lot of Satanists posing as Atheists, but it amounts to the same thing. The head of the NSA Michael Aquino used to do the Geraldo Rivera show in all his Satanic glory. The instances of venereal diseases at the childcare centers on the bases he was stationed was beyond coincidence. He was 1 step ahead of the law in SF, same type situation. At least explore the Bible as a strong possibility, good luck
@waketheoblivious You are a fuckin nut job. I am pretty sure you are aware of this but if not I figured I would point that out. waketheoblivious = Mother fucking nut job. Thank you, that is all.
@waketheoblivious listen to me now little one as I know this will be hard to wrap your mind around but EVERY SINGLE FOSSIL IS A TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL. Every single gOD damned one. Yes we do not have every single fossil for the 99% of all creatures that have ever died off yet and we more than likely never will. But every year we get a lot closer and tons more information on understanding the world we do live in. Trust me, Check out the fused 2 strand of our dna and the information about it.
@waketheoblivious oh and I figured I would point this out when I say we will not likely have every fossil for every species just think of what that would take. 99% of all species to ever live are now dead. Just think of that for a moment. We have more than enough fossil linking various species through proper methods and fitting in with the proper strata in the earth that we would expect to see if evolution was true. There are really good books on it. Have you ever heard of the science section?
Evolution, has repeatedly failed to provide a legitimate missing link. Surely, if you are claiming to know about Evolution you are not referring to a transitional fossil as a "missing link". That is disgraceful ignorance because a transitional fossil does not meet the criteria for either a "missing link" or irrefutable evidence. An Evil Illusion because there is no missing link, we were created by God and if you weren't so determined to justify fraud you would no that.
@waketheoblivious Really? Really? I mean mother fucking REALLY? There are tons of transitional fossils for various species. Why would I be determined to justify fraud that is what I am against. Look at the fused 2nd chromosome of our dna and what that means. And while we do not have a complete human timeline we are getting much closer every year. With in the last 100 years we have found a ton of evidence and really only began searching for such things recently in our time line.
@waketheoblivious And missing links are just transitional fossils that we have not found yet. Once again missing links are just gaps in the fossil record that we have a pretty good grasp on and getting more built up as I type.
But, the real issue boils down to in the entire history of this Evil Illusion it has never legitimately provided a "missing link" to satisfy "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact. Instead it has been over 100 years of teaching an Evil Illusion based on ?? diabolical Haox sustained by a series of diabolical frauds. The Master of Deception did not earn that title with half assed lies, he is famous for betrayal and Evil Illusions. Step beyond science, check history
@waketheoblivious listen. hes already refuted your argument and obviously has read up on the subject of evolution. I suggest you do the same. your just making a bigger fool out of yourself, by posting creationist comments on a video titled "Why do people laugh at creationists? now available for download"
Perhaps you could provide a legitimate "missing link" which Evolutionists have failed to provide for going on a century. The Piltdown Man Hoax (1913-53) was used to install the Evil Illusion and a series of diabolical frauds sustained the Illusion of Evolution having met the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Satanists posing as scientists introduced the illusion and Satanic Nazis shills promote Satanic Fiction as science. Provide a legitimate "missing link" or STFU.
Excuses are like asssholes everyone has one and they all stink. Instead of arguing in favor of being a lazy ass ignorant Nazi, why not take a moment and actually read and investigate instead of standing in place rationalizing and justifying irrational behavior. Although you may be proud of your life's achievements, mindfucked insanity and lazy ignorance as your epitaph are generally considered positive attributes.
Then provide a legitimate "missing link" or identify the irrefutable evidence that enables teaching this Satanic Fiction as scientific fact. Can't, because the evidence does not exist and never has existed. Why? Because we are a created being, just like the author of the Torah stated in His Holy Bible.
Your ignorance is irrefutable and is evidence of what a Satanic Nazi shill does to deny the truth. The truth is Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link, just the original Piltdown Man Hoax sustained by diabolical frauds and they wish to call that science. Hoaxes, diabolical fraud and Evil illusions aren't science they are Satanic deception.
@waketheoblivious I already addressed this in a previous post, calling miscassifications and media hypes hoaxes again, doesn't make you appear very honest nor intelligent
You continue to have a problem with the truth. The truth is that evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link, but has provided a Hoax and a series of diabolical frauds to sustain the Evil Illusion which the Hoax accomplished. What color is the sky in your world? You can't seem to provide a straight answer to even the most simple questions which is typical for those suffering mindfucked insanity.
@waketheoblivious again nebraska man mediahype,you can paste your bugus list over and over, doesn't change the fact that al these so called hoaxes are already uterly debunked at talkorigins as well as by many videos here on YT,
I could post the list of creationist hoaxes again, which are real hoaxes are still being used today unlike piltdownman who was defenitvely discarded in 1953
A Hoax is a diabolical plan which is planned, organized, implemented and controlled. No where else in science do we see such a constant disregard of ethics integrity and professionalism then the Satanic Nazis who are proponents of an Evil Illusion that has never provided a legitimate "missing link". Just the original diabolical HOAX which when discovered was sustained by a constant series of more evil diabolical frauds. The history of Evolution is Corruption and deception.
Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link
Really, hummm..... some tips for your education - go to Goole, type in the below sites, search for content & start to learn..... Education is wonderful, so stop burning books and open your tiny mind......
From Wikipedia type "Timeline of human evolution"
From "Natural History Museum (UK) - Darwin Centre - Human origins"
@waketheoblivious So quick question??? How do you know that the entire bible was not written by your master of deception. After all he is diabolical and the master of deception. You just do not know do you. Look at how fucking bat shit you would have to believe the bible as 100% true. how do you know that the devil did not put his own words in there. i mean a talking burning bush obviously had to be god but the rest of the crazy shit how do you know who you are whoreshiping.
Your question is one most everyone faces. At some point, we tend to try to make sense out of the meaning of life. Following is a repeatable experiment that reveals the author.
Get online version of Torah written in Hebrew. Next, count 5+2 in the first 2 Books & circle, Last two books Count 7-2 circle. Middle Book, count 7 & circle. Each Hebrew character circled translated to English will spell Torah over & over... As you begin to read the text, you will come to know the author.
@waketheoblivious so what does it prove again that a book can say torah over and over again. I can write a book and make it say jessica alba rides my cock everynight that proves nothing at all. All it proves is someone can put words in whatever order they like when they write something. You are just grasping at whatever to try and keep the fairy tales true in your mind. Look and find some real concrete evidence then get back to me.
The pattern can not be duplicated using a modern computer and word prcessing software. If your life depended on it you could not duplicate the digital pattern that was written into the Torah by the author, God. The pattern is verifiable, get a copy of the Torah written in Hebrew and circle the characters. Torah spelled horizontally, vertically and at 45 degree angles by each and every character you have circled. Sorry, for your ignorance. Your ego got the best of you again.
@waketheoblivious Dude, I can not read hebrew to check that out. My ego is in check. I just have not went through every religious book in every freakin language and began circling every freakin random combination of letters to see what it spells. I am still going with religions are bullshit for now.
Are you so inept you are unable to execute a click in a language translation program? The purpose of performing the test was to address your anticipated ignorant claim that the pattern was not there. Recognizing you are too lazy to wipe your own ass your response is your conscious choice to remain ignorant. First you claim you could write a similar pattern, next you claim you can't read Hebrew, which we already expected & the exact reason for language translation program!
@waketheoblivious it wont work that way, you yourself claimed that everything was written together no sentences commas or point, therefore running the torah trough a translation program would produce garbage
now I googled 2 5 7 torah circle and found nothing appart from your reply to me on the bush speech video I could not find any other, could you point us to the source of your knowledge?
Just fucking do it and stop with the lazy ass ignorance. For fuck sake how long did you argue in favor of not wiping your own ass before being convinced to make an effort. What a lazy ass piece of Shit Nazi Satanist you prove yourself to be.
Oh bullshit. You wouldn't have bothered any more then you bothered to show up for any other exam. If it entailed actually doing something beyond standing with your thumb up your ass you passed in favor of a full diaper and a shit eating grin on your face.
@waketheoblivious no you are right I would not have bothered any MORE than I bother to show up for any exam, in other word I would have bothered just as much and be there an hour ahead of time
You are too lazy to perform a repeatable experiment that demonstrates a highly complex pattern was written into the Torah which serves as the authors digital signiture. No one cares if you can't read Hebrew, because it is not necessary when counting to 5 + 2 and circle or subtracting 2 from 7 and circle. Then count 7 in the middle book and circle those Hebrew characters. When converted to English each and every character circled will spell Torah. That is a fact!
@waketheoblivious I'm too lazy and your too stupid to understand that if you do not know hebrew you do not know what to circle a dot might change a words or a character but does the dot preceed the character or come after the previous one
now I asked you for a source are you not willing to provide us with your source?
@waketheoblivious can you provide irrefutable evidence that modern computers and word procerssing software can not do this? not to burst your bubble but that combination can not even write a simple letter it need a human to do so
You can format the document choosing any 5 letter word you care to and attempt to write a legible document that attempts to mimic the pattern that was wove into the Torah, but will fail severely doing so. Even with the assistence of a modern computer and word processing software no writer can duplicate what God wrote in His Holy Torah. The author even discusses those who will fail to recognize the truth even after explicitly expressing why Thy Will should be preferable to our will
Your code could be duplicated by a child with a learning disability. The pattern written into the Torah is so complex it wasn't until 1994 a computer powerful enough to analyze the Hebrew text in one long linear line that it was discovered. A modern author can not duplicate the code using a word processing program and a modern computer. Please spare us your childish desire to pacify your ego with public displays of ignorance.
@waketheoblivious wake as long as you keep using this "irrefutabale evidence was the standard" claim I will be asking you to provide irrefutable evidence that it ever was the standard for all of science and not just those that are math based
You have yet to provide such irrefutable evidence or any evidence for that matter
@waketheoblivious even if everything you said about transitional fossils were true its a good thing that evolution is not held up by just one piece of evidence. There is DNA and observed cases of evolution.
- A legitimate "Missing Link" is an Intergrading Animal Form, intermediate between the major groups of Phyla.
- Exactly what Piltdown Man (1913-53) was designed and planted to accomplish before finally revealed as a HOAX.
- Without a legitimate "missing link", Evolution has NEVER met the standard of "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact. An Evil Illusion, amounting to a Hoax sustained by a series of diabolical frauds presented as the "missing link".
@waketheoblivious again, transitional fossils are not are only bit of evidence (though we have plenty, including the transition from synapsids to mammals. On the human side for a "missing link" Wikipedia/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus
that is at least four missing links.
KNM ER 1813
OH 7
OH 24
KNM ER 1805
Those are all finding of Homo Habilis fossils, that's right there are four, so tell me there are no "missing links" now.
@waketheoblivious also, here is a list of evidence from wikipedia, if you are so inclined you can check the references en.wikipedia.(org)/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent the extent of the fossil record is only a small part.
Evolution can not and never has provided a legitimate missing link in the history of teaching science fiction fraud as scientific fact. The theory was introduced using a manufactured HOAX, Piltdown Man (1913-53) that allowed bypassing school board objection. When the HOAX was finally revealed they immediately pulled the photos from textbooks, but not the unsupported theory. The scientific standard is "irrefutable evidence" to teach a theory as fact, not preponderance of bullshit.
@waketheoblivious I never mentioned Piltdown Man, because it was found to be a hoax, by the discovery of real fossils (by scientists) showing a "missing link" which were not congruent with the forgery. You do not seem to deem it necessary to discount the examples I gave. why? because you can not. You're entire argument seems to be that there were forgeries, but that doesn't matter as we have examples that are not. Piltdown Man was a "HOAX" but the real fossils that showed it to be so are not.
@waketheoblivious “To those who are not completely disillusioned by the work of their predecessors, the disqualification of the Piltdown skull changes little in the broad evolutionary pattern. The validity of the specimen has always been questioned.” -R.W. Ehrich and G.M. Henderson
Taung Child and Peking Man were two of the real fossils which exposed the forgery of Piltdown Man
The tragedy of the Piltdown Man (1913-53) diabolical Hoax used to bypass school board objections, is when the Hoax was finally revealed, it was sustained by a constant stream of new diabolical frauds presented as the "missing link". Evolution has never met the standard of "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact, yet the Evil Illusion continues with 100 years of fraud and deceit. Science is not just missing a legitimate link, it is missing honesty, ethics & integrity.
The two men (Satanic Nazis) who made that statement have no regard for ethics, integrity, honesty or science. They completely have disregarded the orchestrated diabolical fraud which took place. The fraud was deliberate to force teaching an Evil Illusion in public textbooks. 100 years later and Evolution has still never legitimately met the standard of "irrefutable evidence' to be taught as scientific fact. That is a complete total and utter disregard for the truth and humanity.
I just told you about other missing links, such as the Taung Child and Peking man. THOSE ARE MISSING LINKS! I'm sorry to hear you have such a narrow view of reality, can you give me "irrefutable evidence" that those two men are "satanic nazis" (putting aside for the moment that most Nazis, including Hitler, were devout Catholics)
Piltdown Man was used as evidence in the Scopes trial(though not the only evidence), cont...
@arithine cont'd in the end it was real scientists that exposed it to be a hoax, not christians or religious groups, and they showed it to be a hoax by discovering real missing links. If in your view a missing link is irrefutable evidence then we have it.
We do not have irrefutable evidence for the theory of gravity or the theory of atoms, yet both are taught in schools today. Science is not about irrefutable evidence, it is about sufficient evidence and the ability of a theory to predict.
Let me be short, concise and to the point. If your life depended upon within 12 hours providing a legitimate "missing link", (not just a transitional fossil) then say your prayers, because you would be dead by dawn. In 100 years of teaching this fraud as fact, evolution has never legitamately met the scientific standard of "irrefutable evidence" that was obliterated by the Piltdown Man Hoax. Every diabolical fraud presented since that Hoax, is used to sustain the Evil Illusion.
@waketheoblivious ... a transitional fossil is a missing link... I'm just going to give up now, you are not interested in the scientific facts and have decided to remain willfully ignorant. You did nothing but repeat that the Piltdown Man was a fraud but do not recognize what showed it to be such, you refuse to give an opinion on any other points brought up and resort to straw man arguments. Either you are a successful troll or the representation of what is wrong with creationism. good day.
You have 11 hours to go and have already given up. At least your last remaining hours will have at least been honest, because every moment spent participating in championing fraud, is time spent worshipping the Master of Deception. If you value your life you would never take the bet, if you value your soul you would beg God's forgiveness.
@waketheoblivious Oh your challenge was geniune, ok here it goes "On October 1, 2009, paleontologists formally announced the discovery of the relatively complete A. ramidus fossil skeleton first unearthed in 1994. The fossil is the remains of a small-brained 50-kilogram (110 lb) female, nicknamed "Ardi"." Ardi was an example of Ardipithecus, the step that came after Apidium and before Proconsul, the comes Pierolapithecus and Ardipithecus and Australopithecus Homo habilis finally Homo erectus.
@waketheoblivious There you go moving the goal post, even though the merriam-webster describes a missing link as "a hypothetical intermediate evolutionary form between humans and their presumed simian progenitors" but here let me get you a phyla level transitional fossil, Caudofoveata a kind of proto-mollusk, followed by Polyplacophora leading to things like Gastropods (with full shells)
Piltdown Man had scientists who didn't believe it was real from the beginning. Give a new argument or STFU.
Provide a legitimate missing link or STFU and the definition of "missing link" I referenced was provided by ANSI, the American National Scientific Institute and those guidelines are adopted and used for products throughout the world. Worth noting the guidelines for RFR (Radio Frequency Radiation) established for the equipment installed on Wireless Communication Facilities fka Cell Towers, were obliterated. Hardly laughable, it is criminal those towers are built on schoolyards.
@waketheoblivious I just provided one based on your definition, Caudofoveata(mollusk is a phyla). Also I googled both "ANSI" and "American National Scientific Institute" a link would be useful (not saying they don't exist just that i don't know of them and can't find any mention of them on the internet)
Though Caudofoveata is not a "missing" link, as we have fossils of it, making it just a "link" (the scientific term is transitional fossil)
And, if you undertake to validate what I have posted regarding Wireless Communication Facilities you will discover that information although absolute fact is not readily available. I give credit to you for even finding a definition of "missing link" because that definition once included in the glossary of science text books, now is mysteriously missing. Also missing, are the ethics and integrity once associated with science. We have Piltdown Man & Climategate ect to thank for that.
@Toudiyama <----- Classic example of a Satanic Nazi who's friend's list is swimming in Satanic symbolism. He blames everyone for his choice to remain ignorant. The only books he read outside of assigned government textbooks are government training manuals because he is clueless unless he is given orders by another Nazi on what to do or think.
The man who provided the definition is a Phd Scientist with a long list of credentials. Toudi, you can't honestly claim to have graduated highschool and pissed away a free public education thinking you know more then the teachers. You discount facts and rationalize and justify lies. Your behavior is that of an insane egotistical maniac, pathological liar and of course a Satanic Nazi Shill.
@waketheoblivious appeal to authority because you fail to name the Phd
so you now names 2 institutes of which one does not even deal with scientific definitions and an unknow again untracable Phd scientist from an unknow field with unknow credentials
I on the other hand pointed you to Myriam Webster like Arithine did before me, where the definition can be easely found
I noted he was a Phd and had a long list of professional accomplishments, beyond that I don't recall his name. As a formet director of National Science Museum his credentials were more then adequate to define "missing link". As for old text books get off your lazy ass and visit a used book store.
Creationist web sites? You have got to be joking. I get my information from books and from researching on line libraries of information. I own 7 copies of the Holy Bible that were printed anywhere from the 1700's to the 1900's and validate every scripture. The changes are minor among/amongst ect as they are translated into Old English and Modern English. My own personal library is at least 1,000 reference books. Do you own any books that were not assigned reading?
@waketheoblivious if any claim of yours can be referenced with any book you should mention the book not lie about some definition coming from the ANSI which is a standardization institute
you got 7 COPIES of the bible and the validate every scripture? what the heck are you smoking ? making a copy of something does not validate it
It's like saying I have 7 copys of the fairytales of the brothers Grimm and they all validate the stories
Think about it for a moment before you post another display of ignorance, the publishing dates are from the late 1700's up until the late 1900's. What was invented that impacted the number of Bibles in circulation after it's invention? For those who didn't chew the covers off Eli Whitney invented the Cotton Gin, come on Toudi 4th grade science, famous inventions. Thomas Edison is to lightbulb as ????? is to printing press? What year were they invented?
Evolution - Preponderance of Bullshit, recognizing how often Courts of Law have delivered false positives based on preponderance of evidence.
Arguing in favor of diminishing the scientific standard to the gutter level that evolution has drug science, is a sickening public display of ones own disregard for the truth, ethics and integrity.
@waketheoblivious I suppose the fact that we observe it happen isn't evidence then? Or the fact that our genome matches up almost completely with chimps? Or the existence of Pseudogenes? Or the fossil record? Or the fact that all life forms use the same genetic code?
You have got to be kidding me. In science a theory is held up by it's own merits, if there was a flaw in the theory of evolution it would be called out. Scientists have no real problem with their theories being dis-proven.
Woops, the direct download link doesn't work anymore and I don't have any torrent thingy in my computer, so could you have them uploaded someplace else? Thanks! And thank you Thunderf00t for making this series!
I'll be seeding the video archive on one of my servers for quite a while :)
travisnx 1 month ago
Does anyone have the complete (atleast up to a certain point) download of all thunderf00t's videos?
Ziggletooth 1 month ago
Comment removed
Bladzex7 2 months ago
482 people are creationists.
templar19 2 months ago
@templar19 Mind your own business. believe what YOU want to believe, Let others do their believing. I don't know what you believe and frankly i don't want to, But this negative tone against a group of people that doesn't have a negative tone towards yourself is childish and unprovoked. Their are more people in the world who are religious then there are people who are atheist's, So let's just get the best out of it, not hating to much Capiche.
mukkohaha 1 week ago
Comment removed
templar19 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mukkohaha And you call MY 'attacks' childish and unprovoked. You still wonder why people laugh at creationists?
templar19 1 week ago
I just discovered you dude, U rock!!! and thanks for all the hard work.
EST0PA 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations that have survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DEBATE IS NOT OVER. In Darwin's time not enough science was known to refute macro-evolution. There was no understanding of genetics. Darwin thought the cell was just a simple glob. No one knew about DNA, RNA, proteins. Modern evolutionists now know, but the theory is entrenched as gospel and a lot of personal motives are at stake as well. Just saying that something evolved doesn't make it so! Schools should present both sides! Read my article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature can only work with the "cards" it has. Nature is not a genetic engineer! It can't invent new genes. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
Comment removed
Mogley52 5 months ago
I was brought up as a jehovah's witness and you would expect me to be a blinded fool. I found that a lot of beliefs that Christians as a whole believe are based on cultures long since forgotten. I personally don't see how a god who behaves like a child could create anything. To me, it is a myth and would compare the bible to silmarillion
dave19711998 6 months ago
@dave19711998
Except The Silmarillion is at least an entertaining fantasy and part of one of the greatest works of world-building ever.
The Bible is boring or just plain insane from the first verse, and tries to be taken seriously to boot!
orophinellenese 5 months ago
homerbear46 4 months ago
..........Tathagata Buddha, (the Father Buddha), said,
"With our thoughts, we make the world."
Elemental forces caused the egg to hatch.
From it then came a stone monkey.
The nature of Monkey was irrepressible!
/watch?v=o3gQ65sWSS4&feature=channel_video_title
Sign up for the Church of King Monkey today and go in the prize-draw to win an official Monkey Magic bo-staff. =D..every new member is guaranteed a pair of fun Pigsey-Ears =D
homerbear46 4 months ago
people need to learn how to use a flash downloader lol.
brongarago 6 months ago
None of these links are working!
hznfrst 6 months ago
0+0=0
JamesRideout123 7 months ago
i cant use any of these. Could you please add the videos to Itunes?
SM4SHaZ 8 months ago
As a Christian I probably shouldn't be posting this, but I DARE you to take this cartoon to a Muslim theocracy and show it. You'll probably end up in jail, getting the worst beating of your life.
1bschaffer 9 months ago
@1bschaffer Yes that is the finest example of why religion needs to go, thank goodness that religion doesnt have that much power in the west
mehico33 7 months ago
hail to you, TF, from the dark center of the bible belt
Runningtail 9 months ago
You are badass Thunderf00t!
HammockerSam 9 months ago
ht tp://filefactory. com/file/ca979a0/n/WDPLaC.rar
I'm not sure how long it'll be up but, for those who can't use the links provided, this worked for me...
lagurash 9 months ago 10
what is the word that is said at 0.46 "it helps protect against .......... attacks"?.
anyway let people laugh .if i do believe in god and im wrong, then what have i lost ?.but if i dont believe in god and im wrong ,then what have i lost?
reksub10 9 months ago
@reksub10
Sorry, pascal's wager had been refuted, and will not be taken seriously here...
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn yeah i know but the answer to pascals wager is,no matter what you believe youve lost nothing.if your a bad person but you "believe" then youll get into heaven..but surly good works gets you in as well without belief.if there is a heaven that is. and if there isnt a heaven then its cease to exsist.so no matter what youve lost nothing ,making pascals wager moot.imo..thats what i was trying to get at hence the question marks
reksub10 9 months ago
@reksub10
Dude, no... Look Pascal's wager proposes that if you believe: you're safe no matter what moral alignment, but if you don't believe, it's a 50/50 shot. If there is a god you have everything to lose, but if there isn't; you're fine. This is a dumb argument because God would easily be able to tell if a human just believed in him to get into heaven without living a fruitful life for the glory of God. Plus, if you brainwash yourself your entire (God doesn't exist), you really lost nothing?
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago
@reksub10
I don't know where you get off saying good deeds get you into Heaven, that's just not true in reality or Christianity. You're just making up your own denomination/beliefs for what you see to be fair, and the only reason you have to do that is because the penalty of sin, and the redemption/eternal torture on judgment day is already unfair to begin with. "Real Christians" (if there is such a thing) believe that Jesus is the ONLY way to Heaven. No good deeds necessary. Nub.
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn depends on what heaven your trying to enter .and "real cristians"werent what we where talking about.but if there are/where "real" followers of the man/god jesus then it would be following his way not belief in the man /god jesus that would get you into heaven which would be more akin to the eastern philosophies which is nothing but good deeds(karma)that reaps the reward.jesus taught many things.plus you insulted so massive fail
reksub10 9 months ago
@reksub10
You must not know your own basic beliefs dude. In Christianity, it's all about believing. That's all you have to do, and you're in. So what "way" of God/Jesus do we follow? Do we be kind to people like Jesus (one of my top respected idols), or do we act like God and have others killed when we do not get our way? I'd be happy to say that insulting any entity/person of such nature is, on contrary to your beliefs, a massive win. Christianity is about faith, not eastern philosophies! :P
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn
I do believe that a truly loving and forgiving God would accept people into Heaven for good deeds, but honestly, that begs the question: Would a forgiving, loving God create hell in the first place? If he loves his creation, why does he need punishment to forgive us?
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn
A fair, loving God would not WANT us to worry about whether we're safe or not after we die. Are not the problems in life enough turmoil for our spirit to endure? A God that would allow eternal torture for disbelieve in a far-fetched superstition is nothing but sadistic, evil, and wicked. This is another reason why Pascal's wager shouldn't even exist. You're not going to justify a God that is demented. All Gods forbid disbelief in other God's with a promise of hell. It's stupid!
GuitarMannnnnn 9 months ago 4
@GuitarMannnnnn Not Buddhism or Hinduism.
PennyDreadful1 6 months ago
@PennyDreadful1
That's true; you're not a Buddhist are you?
GuitarMannnnnn 6 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn even if pascal's wager was justified (which as you correctly pointed out, it isn't) it's impossible. You can't force yourself to believe something if you don't. I could go on for ages about this but it would be quicker to just mention DarkMatter2525's video The Real God: An Epiphany. And a funny thng about pascal's wager is, Kirk Cameron, who uses it so much, actually said it makes you a hipocrite and that god will reject you
AntiMatterWave 4 months ago
@AntiMatterWave
It just goes to show: If your only reason for believing in God is Pascal's wager, then you don't technically "believe" in your God at all. You're really an agnostic theist in disguise... haha. And if anyone resorts to using Pascal's wager to defend their beliefs, that really has something to say about how "faithful" they are.
P.S. You didn't expect any self-identified hypocrisy from Kirk Cameron, did you? Haha, it's incredible how creationists can be both funny AND annoying. XD
GuitarMannnnnn 4 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn he doesn't.
MaskofMystery 8 months ago
@GuitarMannnnnn its a pity you see jesus an as idol ,thats why your having massive problems..and isulting people who make a comment on you tube is stilla massive fail no matter how you try to spin it to make yourself feel better for being said failure
reksub10 9 months ago
I couldn't download using any of the direct links, and I really do not use torrents for download. Is there any other option available?
Another thing, I'd really like to help and make portuguese subtitles to these videos so that they could also be available for friends of mine who doesn't speak english. How do I "assign for this mission"? lol.
Big fan of thunderfoot work!!
Credesign 10 months ago
The lostsignalnetwork link is working for me :)
llucan01 10 months ago
or use downloadyoutube.
chickenfool121 11 months ago
Can anybody seed these torrents?
DanielBMS 11 months ago
GREAT JOB THUNDERFOOT!!! WHAT A SUCCESS!!!
maciverandy 11 months ago
R Dawkins suffers mindfucked insanity having reneged on his fundamental commitment to truth. An honest commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Subsequently dismissing God as a possibility, breaches that fundamental commitment resulting in a fatal logic error. All atheists/Satanists abandon their fundamental commitment which were wired to a lightswitch of convenience. Presented an option to deny the truth, they chose to suck a lies dick.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
Partial list of diabolical Frauds, presented by Satanists posing as scientists as the famous and ficticious "Missing Link":
1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Diabolical Manufactured Planted Evidence
Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth
Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils
Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster
Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone
2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification
2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAhAHAhAhAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHA!
ScottBrown666 1 year ago
Is someone laughing at creationists? Why? There's a fundamental difference between a "Creationist", and a Christian. A Creationist (proponent of "Intelligent Design") may not attribute creation to The Living God responsible for it. The Christian KNOWS the truth of God's Creation by His divine wisdom, evident in every detail [that we do know] of it. Having seen Thunderf00t's series, I'm still convinced "creationists" are striking closer (and closer) to truth than Thunderf00t has done therein.
shegb79 1 year ago
@shegb79one may be a creationist and not accept jesus as divine; however, those who do feel that jesus of nazereth was the 'savior' are by definition creationist. "The Christian KNOWS the truth of God's Creation by His divine wisdom, evident in every detail [that we do know] of it,"...i call bullshit! that's NOT a demonstration of knowledge. 2+2=4, i can show you how 2+2=4; how can you show the truth of god by his wisdom, how do you know that's his wisdom and not some pharaohs? demonstrate it!
hoosiergambler 1 year ago
@hoosiergambler I know at least two people who believe this universe was created. Neither of them believe in Jesus' divinity as their Saviour, King, servant, God or anything else. To them, He was a man and no more. I have no truth of my own to show you. God has already done that Himself, and I can only point to it so you can see for yourself. (Read Psalm 19: verses 1-4). If you want the Truth, look for it. I'm not trying to convert, just interested in discussion. There are good comments here.:-)
shegb79 1 year ago
@shegb79
Is someone laughing at creationists?
yes, many, many of us are laughing so hard that it is becoming difficult to keep from wetting ourselves!
Why?
many simply define faith as belief without evidence,
the rest of us define gullible as belief without evidence!
hoosiergambler 1 year ago
@hoosiergambler Psalm 19: verses 1 to 4
1 The heavens proclaim the glory of God.
The skies display his craftsmanship.
2 Day after day they continue to speak;
night after night they make him known.
3 There is no speech nor language
Where their voice is not heard.
4 Yet their message has gone throughout the earth,
and their words to all the world.
shegb79 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waketheoblivious
"Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link"
Really 'waketheoblivious', hummm..... some tips for your education - go to Goole, type in the below sites, search for content & start to learn..... Education is wonderful, so stop burning books and open your tiny mind......
From Wikipedia type "Timeline of human evolution"
From "Natural History Museum (UK) - Darwin Centre - Human origins""
TheFireHorseUK 1 year ago
In the side panel I can see the individual videos for 'why people laugh...' but cannot find a download option to optain them all. Is there another option / website where I can down load them in one go. Sorry if this is stupid question.
Many thanks
YojimboRiley 1 year ago
List of diabolical Frauds, presented by Satanists posing as scientists. Evolution has never provided a legitimate "Missing Link" or met the standard of irrefutable evidence.
1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Diabolical fraud.
Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth
Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils
Lucy, Manipulated Fossil, Plaster
Orce Man, 4 Mo. Old Donkey Bone
2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification
2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Brilliant. Now if only you could prove that. Unfortunately, in science, faith doesn't prove anything.
SocialDissimulation 1 year ago
@SocialDissimulation
Prove it? I stated the history of diabolical fraud associated with Evolutions Hoax Piltdown Man introduced by Satanists posing as scientists. Fact, Evolution has never provided a ligitimate missing link or satisfied the standard of irrefutable evidence. Evolution is Satanic Fiction, an Evil Illusion started with a Hoax and sustained with a series of diabolical frauds.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
It is this sort of blatant denial of reality that will prevent you from ever making a convincing argument to anyone with the slightest knowledge of the subject. Unfortunately for you, the research required to actually support your position would probably end up utterly destroying your faith anyway.
Phage0070 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious " I stated the history of diabolical fraud associated with Evolutions Hoax Piltdown Man introduced by Satanists posing as scientists" which is a blatent lie as the person who commited the hoax was an amateur geologist and therefore not a scientist nor posing as such
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
His home was filled with other manipulated fossils. He had a library of Satanic Literature and was a member of a Secret Society. He deliberately manufactured a Hoax that could satisfy irrefutable evidence and bypass schoolboard objections so science fiction could be taught as fact. A deliberate calculated manipulative Hoax that constitutes a crime against humanity, to create an Evil Illusion that to this day has NEVER PROVIDED A LEGITIMATE "MISSING LINK". An evil liar like you.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious utter BS, the only rewason he did that is to gain notoriety
oh and pleased sod off with your "crinme against humanty"
And no matter how often you post something mentioning irrefutable evidence, it still never was the standard for anything that does not involve mathematics
the fact that you keep claining it is or was means you are the liar here, a liar for jebus
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious and he was not a scientist, he was an amateur. so no matter what you can't blame the sientist for it especially those not of GB
Next, they have not provided a legitimate missing link that suit the definition you use for it, and please do not try this crap that is comes from a reputable source as I have searched the full site of that source and your definition can not be found.
And If I can do one thing it is finding stuff on the internet
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Right a amatuer scientist was able to fool the entire science community for forty years. How many times have people sold you the Brooklyn bridge? You are remarkably gullible. Are you so impressed by a lab coat that they can sell you any line of bullshit because they dress the part? If you haven't been able to figure it out your enemy is the Master of Deception, yet he played you so perfectly you think your enemy is the truth. Your preference for lazy ignorance is not surprising.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious what whole science community? you have been told over and over that outside of GB it was not accepted, is GB the whole world?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
What "irrefutable evidence" did GB use in order to have begun teaching a scientific theory as scientific fact in public text books? Without irrefutable evidence Evolution amounts to science fiction and is instrumental in creating an Evil Illusion that fits perfectly with the Satanic Agenda.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waketheoblivious first provide evdence that irrefutable evidence was the standard for all of science
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious /Rips your mask off. Sees a troll.
SocialDissimulation 1 year ago
@SocialDissimulation <----- Rips off the dumb like a fox costume revealing a Godforsaken Satanic Nazi who would rather operate as an evil Traitor then do the right thing. The fact is the Evolutionist/Creationist debate has long been moot. Based on reviewing hundreds of videos that dipict demonic alien life forms in the gulf, it becomes obvious Both God and Satan do exist.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
there are no alien life forms in the gulf they are called hoaxes
keaverkite 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious nazi were catholics hitler was a catholic the meinkampf talks about god alot
keaverkite 1 year ago
@keaverkite Hitler created his own religion it teaches that jesus fought against the jews
munggipossu 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious FAIL
123Atheist 1 year ago
@123Ath
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themselves fundamentally liars & frauds. When Atheist/Satanists dismiss the possibility of God, breaching their commitment to the truth, results in the mindfucked insanity, to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
Atheist/Satanist = Godforsaken Nazis
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I'm not dismissing the possibility of a God. I just don't believe in one because of many reasons. There isn't any good evidence for God. Sure there is evidence but it is much better explained by other things, rather than magic.
123Atheist 1 year ago
@123Atheist
You have a degree of honesty that goes beyond many so-called Atheists. There are a lot of Satanists posing as Atheists, but it amounts to the same thing. The head of the NSA Michael Aquino used to do the Geraldo Rivera show in all his Satanic glory. The instances of venereal diseases at the childcare centers on the bases he was stationed was beyond coincidence. He was 1 step ahead of the law in SF, same type situation. At least explore the Bible as a strong possibility, good luck
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious You are a fuckin nut job. I am pretty sure you are aware of this but if not I figured I would point that out. waketheoblivious = Mother fucking nut job. Thank you, that is all.
party489 1 year ago
@party489
Simple. Provide a legitimate missing link or STFU
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious listen to me now little one as I know this will be hard to wrap your mind around but EVERY SINGLE FOSSIL IS A TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL. Every single gOD damned one. Yes we do not have every single fossil for the 99% of all creatures that have ever died off yet and we more than likely never will. But every year we get a lot closer and tons more information on understanding the world we do live in. Trust me, Check out the fused 2 strand of our dna and the information about it.
party489 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious oh and I figured I would point this out when I say we will not likely have every fossil for every species just think of what that would take. 99% of all species to ever live are now dead. Just think of that for a moment. We have more than enough fossil linking various species through proper methods and fitting in with the proper strata in the earth that we would expect to see if evolution was true. There are really good books on it. Have you ever heard of the science section?
party489 1 year ago
@party489
Evolution, has repeatedly failed to provide a legitimate missing link. Surely, if you are claiming to know about Evolution you are not referring to a transitional fossil as a "missing link". That is disgraceful ignorance because a transitional fossil does not meet the criteria for either a "missing link" or irrefutable evidence. An Evil Illusion because there is no missing link, we were created by God and if you weren't so determined to justify fraud you would no that.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Really? Really? I mean mother fucking REALLY? There are tons of transitional fossils for various species. Why would I be determined to justify fraud that is what I am against. Look at the fused 2nd chromosome of our dna and what that means. And while we do not have a complete human timeline we are getting much closer every year. With in the last 100 years we have found a ton of evidence and really only began searching for such things recently in our time line.
party489 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious And missing links are just transitional fossils that we have not found yet. Once again missing links are just gaps in the fossil record that we have a pretty good grasp on and getting more built up as I type.
party489 1 year ago
@party489
But, the real issue boils down to in the entire history of this Evil Illusion it has never legitimately provided a "missing link" to satisfy "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact. Instead it has been over 100 years of teaching an Evil Illusion based on ?? diabolical Haox sustained by a series of diabolical frauds. The Master of Deception did not earn that title with half assed lies, he is famous for betrayal and Evil Illusions. Step beyond science, check history
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious listen. hes already refuted your argument and obviously has read up on the subject of evolution. I suggest you do the same. your just making a bigger fool out of yourself, by posting creationist comments on a video titled "Why do people laugh at creationists? now available for download"
DevrorveD 1 year ago
@DevrorveD Good call.
party489 1 year ago
@DevrorveD
Perhaps you could provide a legitimate "missing link" which Evolutionists have failed to provide for going on a century. The Piltdown Man Hoax (1913-53) was used to install the Evil Illusion and a series of diabolical frauds sustained the Illusion of Evolution having met the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Satanists posing as scientists introduced the illusion and Satanic Nazis shills promote Satanic Fiction as science. Provide a legitimate "missing link" or STFU.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious something that wasn't accpeted outside of GB was used to install evolution worldwide, that really does not make any sense
oh and do not tell other to shut up on a video yyou have not uploaded, especially a video from TF
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Excuses are like asssholes everyone has one and they all stink. Instead of arguing in favor of being a lazy ass ignorant Nazi, why not take a moment and actually read and investigate instead of standing in place rationalizing and justifying irrational behavior. Although you may be proud of your life's achievements, mindfucked insanity and lazy ignorance as your epitaph are generally considered positive attributes.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious exuses what exuses? it is the truth, the truth you try to distort so it will support your claim
you classify mistakes and mediahypes as hoaxes purpotraded by scientist
I could tell you the same read something about evolution from a reputable source on the matter, this excludes any creationist site
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Then provide a legitimate "missing link" or identify the irrefutable evidence that enables teaching this Satanic Fiction as scientific fact. Can't, because the evidence does not exist and never has existed. Why? Because we are a created being, just like the author of the Torah stated in His Holy Bible.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious first provide evdence that irrefutable evidence was the standard for all of science
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Your ignorance is irrefutable and is evidence of what a Satanic Nazi shill does to deny the truth. The truth is Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link, just the original Piltdown Man Hoax sustained by diabolical frauds and they wish to call that science. Hoaxes, diabolical fraud and Evil illusions aren't science they are Satanic deception.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I already addressed this in a previous post, calling miscassifications and media hypes hoaxes again, doesn't make you appear very honest nor intelligent
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
You continue to have a problem with the truth. The truth is that evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link, but has provided a Hoax and a series of diabolical frauds to sustain the Evil Illusion which the Hoax accomplished. What color is the sky in your world? You can't seem to provide a straight answer to even the most simple questions which is typical for those suffering mindfucked insanity.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious changing the word hoax to fraud doesn't make it less dishonest when talking about misclassifications and mediahypes
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Partial list of diabolical manufactured Frauds, presented by Satanists posing as scientists as the ficticious "Missing Link":
1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Diabolical Manufactured Planted Evidence
Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth
Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils
Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster
Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone
2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification
2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious again nebraska man mediahype,you can paste your bugus list over and over, doesn't change the fact that al these so called hoaxes are already uterly debunked at talkorigins as well as by many videos here on YT,
I could post the list of creationist hoaxes again, which are real hoaxes are still being used today unlike piltdownman who was defenitvely discarded in 1953
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
A Hoax is a diabolical plan which is planned, organized, implemented and controlled. No where else in science do we see such a constant disregard of ethics integrity and professionalism then the Satanic Nazis who are proponents of an Evil Illusion that has never provided a legitimate "missing link". Just the original diabolical HOAX which when discovered was sustained by a constant series of more evil diabolical frauds. The history of Evolution is Corruption and deception.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious repeating it again and again doesn't make it all of a sudden become true, you appear to be stuck in a mantra
PS missing link= creationist term not used in biology
Toudiyama 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waketheoblivious
Evolution has never provided a legitimate missing link
Really, hummm..... some tips for your education - go to Goole, type in the below sites, search for content & start to learn..... Education is wonderful, so stop burning books and open your tiny mind......
From Wikipedia type "Timeline of human evolution"
From "Natural History Museum (UK) - Darwin Centre - Human origins"
TheFireHorseUK 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious So quick question??? How do you know that the entire bible was not written by your master of deception. After all he is diabolical and the master of deception. You just do not know do you. Look at how fucking bat shit you would have to believe the bible as 100% true. how do you know that the devil did not put his own words in there. i mean a talking burning bush obviously had to be god but the rest of the crazy shit how do you know who you are whoreshiping.
party489 1 year ago
@party489
Your question is one most everyone faces. At some point, we tend to try to make sense out of the meaning of life. Following is a repeatable experiment that reveals the author.
Get online version of Torah written in Hebrew. Next, count 5+2 in the first 2 Books & circle, Last two books Count 7-2 circle. Middle Book, count 7 & circle. Each Hebrew character circled translated to English will spell Torah over & over... As you begin to read the text, you will come to know the author.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious so what does it prove again that a book can say torah over and over again. I can write a book and make it say jessica alba rides my cock everynight that proves nothing at all. All it proves is someone can put words in whatever order they like when they write something. You are just grasping at whatever to try and keep the fairy tales true in your mind. Look and find some real concrete evidence then get back to me.
party489 1 year ago
@party489
The pattern can not be duplicated using a modern computer and word prcessing software. If your life depended on it you could not duplicate the digital pattern that was written into the Torah by the author, God. The pattern is verifiable, get a copy of the Torah written in Hebrew and circle the characters. Torah spelled horizontally, vertically and at 45 degree angles by each and every character you have circled. Sorry, for your ignorance. Your ego got the best of you again.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Dude, I can not read hebrew to check that out. My ego is in check. I just have not went through every religious book in every freakin language and began circling every freakin random combination of letters to see what it spells. I am still going with religions are bullshit for now.
party489 1 year ago
@party489
Are you so inept you are unable to execute a click in a language translation program? The purpose of performing the test was to address your anticipated ignorant claim that the pattern was not there. Recognizing you are too lazy to wipe your own ass your response is your conscious choice to remain ignorant. First you claim you could write a similar pattern, next you claim you can't read Hebrew, which we already expected & the exact reason for language translation program!
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious it wont work that way, you yourself claimed that everything was written together no sentences commas or point, therefore running the torah trough a translation program would produce garbage
now I googled 2 5 7 torah circle and found nothing appart from your reply to me on the bush speech video I could not find any other, could you point us to the source of your knowledge?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Just fucking do it and stop with the lazy ass ignorance. For fuck sake how long did you argue in favor of not wiping your own ass before being convinced to make an effort. What a lazy ass piece of Shit Nazi Satanist you prove yourself to be.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious so no sources? pitty I would have liked to examine it
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Oh bullshit. You wouldn't have bothered any more then you bothered to show up for any other exam. If it entailed actually doing something beyond standing with your thumb up your ass you passed in favor of a full diaper and a shit eating grin on your face.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious no you are right I would not have bothered any MORE than I bother to show up for any exam, in other word I would have bothered just as much and be there an hour ahead of time
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
You are too lazy to perform a repeatable experiment that demonstrates a highly complex pattern was written into the Torah which serves as the authors digital signiture. No one cares if you can't read Hebrew, because it is not necessary when counting to 5 + 2 and circle or subtracting 2 from 7 and circle. Then count 7 in the middle book and circle those Hebrew characters. When converted to English each and every character circled will spell Torah. That is a fact!
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I'm too lazy and your too stupid to understand that if you do not know hebrew you do not know what to circle a dot might change a words or a character but does the dot preceed the character or come after the previous one
now I asked you for a source are you not willing to provide us with your source?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious can you provide irrefutable evidence that modern computers and word procerssing software can not do this? not to burst your bubble but that combination can not even write a simple letter it need a human to do so
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
You can format the document choosing any 5 letter word you care to and attempt to write a legible document that attempts to mimic the pattern that was wove into the Torah, but will fail severely doing so. Even with the assistence of a modern computer and word processing software no writer can duplicate what God wrote in His Holy Torah. The author even discusses those who will fail to recognize the truth even after explicitly expressing why Thy Will should be preferable to our will
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious and that irrefutable evidence?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious If THERE was truth all it IS could be the simple accumulation of NO real GOD or gods knowledge.
my 257 code. The second word is THERE the fifth word after that is IS the seventh word after that is NO and the second word after that is GOD
thus there is no god, because it is written in cryptic code.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Your code could be duplicated by a child with a learning disability. The pattern written into the Torah is so complex it wasn't until 1994 a computer powerful enough to analyze the Hebrew text in one long linear line that it was discovered. A modern author can not duplicate the code using a word processing program and a modern computer. Please spare us your childish desire to pacify your ego with public displays of ignorance.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious wake as long as you keep using this "irrefutabale evidence was the standard" claim I will be asking you to provide irrefutable evidence that it ever was the standard for all of science and not just those that are math based
You have yet to provide such irrefutable evidence or any evidence for that matter
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious even if everything you said about transitional fossils were true its a good thing that evolution is not held up by just one piece of evidence. There is DNA and observed cases of evolution.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
- A legitimate "Missing Link" is an Intergrading Animal Form, intermediate between the major groups of Phyla.
- Exactly what Piltdown Man (1913-53) was designed and planted to accomplish before finally revealed as a HOAX.
- Without a legitimate "missing link", Evolution has NEVER met the standard of "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact. An Evil Illusion, amounting to a Hoax sustained by a series of diabolical frauds presented as the "missing link".
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious again, transitional fossils are not are only bit of evidence (though we have plenty, including the transition from synapsids to mammals. On the human side for a "missing link" Wikipedia/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus
that is at least four missing links.
KNM ER 1813
OH 7
OH 24
KNM ER 1805
Those are all finding of Homo Habilis fossils, that's right there are four, so tell me there are no "missing links" now.
arithine 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious also, here is a list of evidence from wikipedia, if you are so inclined you can check the references en.wikipedia.(org)/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent the extent of the fossil record is only a small part.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Evolution can not and never has provided a legitimate missing link in the history of teaching science fiction fraud as scientific fact. The theory was introduced using a manufactured HOAX, Piltdown Man (1913-53) that allowed bypassing school board objection. When the HOAX was finally revealed they immediately pulled the photos from textbooks, but not the unsupported theory. The scientific standard is "irrefutable evidence" to teach a theory as fact, not preponderance of bullshit.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I never mentioned Piltdown Man, because it was found to be a hoax, by the discovery of real fossils (by scientists) showing a "missing link" which were not congruent with the forgery. You do not seem to deem it necessary to discount the examples I gave. why? because you can not. You're entire argument seems to be that there were forgeries, but that doesn't matter as we have examples that are not. Piltdown Man was a "HOAX" but the real fossils that showed it to be so are not.
arithine 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious “To those who are not completely disillusioned by the work of their predecessors, the disqualification of the Piltdown skull changes little in the broad evolutionary pattern. The validity of the specimen has always been questioned.” -R.W. Ehrich and G.M. Henderson
Taung Child and Peking Man were two of the real fossils which exposed the forgery of Piltdown Man
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
The tragedy of the Piltdown Man (1913-53) diabolical Hoax used to bypass school board objections, is when the Hoax was finally revealed, it was sustained by a constant stream of new diabolical frauds presented as the "missing link". Evolution has never met the standard of "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as scientific fact, yet the Evil Illusion continues with 100 years of fraud and deceit. Science is not just missing a legitimate link, it is missing honesty, ethics & integrity.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@arithine
The two men (Satanic Nazis) who made that statement have no regard for ethics, integrity, honesty or science. They completely have disregarded the orchestrated diabolical fraud which took place. The fraud was deliberate to force teaching an Evil Illusion in public textbooks. 100 years later and Evolution has still never legitimately met the standard of "irrefutable evidence' to be taught as scientific fact. That is a complete total and utter disregard for the truth and humanity.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious ... wow... just wow...
I just told you about other missing links, such as the Taung Child and Peking man. THOSE ARE MISSING LINKS! I'm sorry to hear you have such a narrow view of reality, can you give me "irrefutable evidence" that those two men are "satanic nazis" (putting aside for the moment that most Nazis, including Hitler, were devout Catholics)
Piltdown Man was used as evidence in the Scopes trial(though not the only evidence), cont...
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine cont'd in the end it was real scientists that exposed it to be a hoax, not christians or religious groups, and they showed it to be a hoax by discovering real missing links. If in your view a missing link is irrefutable evidence then we have it.
We do not have irrefutable evidence for the theory of gravity or the theory of atoms, yet both are taught in schools today. Science is not about irrefutable evidence, it is about sufficient evidence and the ability of a theory to predict.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Let me be short, concise and to the point. If your life depended upon within 12 hours providing a legitimate "missing link", (not just a transitional fossil) then say your prayers, because you would be dead by dawn. In 100 years of teaching this fraud as fact, evolution has never legitamately met the scientific standard of "irrefutable evidence" that was obliterated by the Piltdown Man Hoax. Every diabolical fraud presented since that Hoax, is used to sustain the Evil Illusion.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious ... a transitional fossil is a missing link... I'm just going to give up now, you are not interested in the scientific facts and have decided to remain willfully ignorant. You did nothing but repeat that the Piltdown Man was a fraud but do not recognize what showed it to be such, you refuse to give an opinion on any other points brought up and resort to straw man arguments. Either you are a successful troll or the representation of what is wrong with creationism. good day.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
You have 11 hours to go and have already given up. At least your last remaining hours will have at least been honest, because every moment spent participating in championing fraud, is time spent worshipping the Master of Deception. If you value your life you would never take the bet, if you value your soul you would beg God's forgiveness.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Oh your challenge was geniune, ok here it goes "On October 1, 2009, paleontologists formally announced the discovery of the relatively complete A. ramidus fossil skeleton first unearthed in 1994. The fossil is the remains of a small-brained 50-kilogram (110 lb) female, nicknamed "Ardi"." Ardi was an example of Ardipithecus, the step that came after Apidium and before Proconsul, the comes Pierolapithecus and Ardipithecus and Australopithecus Homo habilis finally Homo erectus.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Surely you are not submitting a transitional fossil inferring it satisfies the definition of a "missing link"?
- A "Missing Link" is an Intergrading Animal Form, intermediate between the major groups of Phyla.
- Precisely the criteria diabolical Piltdown Man (1913-53) was planted and designed to accomplish before finally revealed as a Hoax.
- Evolution, a fraudulent Hoax to create an evil illusion, sustained by a series of diabolical frauds.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious There you go moving the goal post, even though the merriam-webster describes a missing link as "a hypothetical intermediate evolutionary form between humans and their presumed simian progenitors" but here let me get you a phyla level transitional fossil, Caudofoveata a kind of proto-mollusk, followed by Polyplacophora leading to things like Gastropods (with full shells)
Piltdown Man had scientists who didn't believe it was real from the beginning. Give a new argument or STFU.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Provide a legitimate missing link or STFU and the definition of "missing link" I referenced was provided by ANSI, the American National Scientific Institute and those guidelines are adopted and used for products throughout the world. Worth noting the guidelines for RFR (Radio Frequency Radiation) established for the equipment installed on Wireless Communication Facilities fka Cell Towers, were obliterated. Hardly laughable, it is criminal those towers are built on schoolyards.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I just provided one based on your definition, Caudofoveata(mollusk is a phyla). Also I googled both "ANSI" and "American National Scientific Institute" a link would be useful (not saying they don't exist just that i don't know of them and can't find any mention of them on the internet)
Though Caudofoveata is not a "missing" link, as we have fossils of it, making it just a "link" (the scientific term is transitional fossil)
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
And, if you undertake to validate what I have posted regarding Wireless Communication Facilities you will discover that information although absolute fact is not readily available. I give credit to you for even finding a definition of "missing link" because that definition once included in the glossary of science text books, now is mysteriously missing. Also missing, are the ethics and integrity once associated with science. We have Piltdown Man & Climategate ect to thank for that.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious unlike you arithine obvious does research before posting
ANSI=American National Standards Institute the American equivalent of the German DIN or the international ISO
Will you provide a link to an old science book that has the decription in the glossary? Of course you won't
Neither will you do the same for piltdownman being in the textbooks to support evolution
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious instead of your untraceable definition of missing link try to use the definition Myriam Webster gives
you keep describing a crokoduck which is a crossbreed not a missing link
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama <----- Classic example of a Satanic Nazi who's friend's list is swimming in Satanic symbolism. He blames everyone for his choice to remain ignorant. The only books he read outside of assigned government textbooks are government training manuals because he is clueless unless he is given orders by another Nazi on what to do or think.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
The man who provided the definition is a Phd Scientist with a long list of credentials. Toudi, you can't honestly claim to have graduated highschool and pissed away a free public education thinking you know more then the teachers. You discount facts and rationalize and justify lies. Your behavior is that of an insane egotistical maniac, pathological liar and of course a Satanic Nazi Shill.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious appeal to authority because you fail to name the Phd
so you now names 2 institutes of which one does not even deal with scientific definitions and an unknow again untracable Phd scientist from an unknow field with unknow credentials
I on the other hand pointed you to Myriam Webster like Arithine did before me, where the definition can be easely found
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
I noted he was a Phd and had a long list of professional accomplishments, beyond that I don't recall his name. As a formet director of National Science Museum his credentials were more then adequate to define "missing link". As for old text books get off your lazy ass and visit a used book store.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I discount facts, which facts have you ever presented, facts can be checked what you present here can not as it is untracable
just admit you get your so called fact from creationist sites, if they state it comes from a certain institute you believe them without checking it
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Creationist web sites? You have got to be joking. I get my information from books and from researching on line libraries of information. I own 7 copies of the Holy Bible that were printed anywhere from the 1700's to the 1900's and validate every scripture. The changes are minor among/amongst ect as they are translated into Old English and Modern English. My own personal library is at least 1,000 reference books. Do you own any books that were not assigned reading?
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious if any claim of yours can be referenced with any book you should mention the book not lie about some definition coming from the ANSI which is a standardization institute
you got 7 COPIES of the bible and the validate every scripture? what the heck are you smoking ? making a copy of something does not validate it
It's like saying I have 7 copys of the fairytales of the brothers Grimm and they all validate the stories
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Think about it for a moment before you post another display of ignorance, the publishing dates are from the late 1700's up until the late 1900's. What was invented that impacted the number of Bibles in circulation after it's invention? For those who didn't chew the covers off Eli Whitney invented the Cotton Gin, come on Toudi 4th grade science, famous inventions. Thomas Edison is to lightbulb as ????? is to printing press? What year were they invented?
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Pi Chang, Gutenberg, Laurens Janszoon Coster or Dirk Martens
and what does that have to do with using the bible to validate the bible?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama
Serious, go back and start over. Try and get a seat in a kidergarten class you are a complete and total ignoramus.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
*sigh*.
You really need to take a few courses in methodology and critical thinking. Thus far you're nothing but a ranting madman.
Aaberg123 1 year ago
@arithine
Physical Sciences - Irrefutable Evidence
Social Sciences - Emperical Evidence
Court of Law - Preponderance of Evidence
Evolution - Preponderance of Bullshit, recognizing how often Courts of Law have delivered false positives based on preponderance of evidence.
Arguing in favor of diminishing the scientific standard to the gutter level that evolution has drug science, is a sickening public display of ones own disregard for the truth, ethics and integrity.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I suppose the fact that we observe it happen isn't evidence then? Or the fact that our genome matches up almost completely with chimps? Or the existence of Pseudogenes? Or the fossil record? Or the fact that all life forms use the same genetic code?
You have got to be kidding me. In science a theory is held up by it's own merits, if there was a flaw in the theory of evolution it would be called out. Scientists have no real problem with their theories being dis-proven.
arithine 1 year ago
@arithine
Provide a legitimate missing link or STFU.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
Why do people laugh at stupid ppl?
lachmeneger 1 year ago 2
Torrents don't seem to work either, no seeders.
123backinyerface 1 year ago
Comment removed
NoFearOfGod 1 year ago
Woops, the direct download link doesn't work anymore and I don't have any torrent thingy in my computer, so could you have them uploaded someplace else? Thanks! And thank you Thunderf00t for making this series!
yongkykuncoro 1 year ago
Glad to have this, some of my friends are interested in having this. Do you mind myself or others mirroring your series?
Darkstar1484 1 year ago