They directly murdered them .. they didnt even gave Nicholas II a trial... all on the basement of Ipatiev house on the night of July 17 , 1918 .. All of the companies (even the maids and a dog..) were not sparred and all well brutally murdered! :( ..
What I found strange is that I was reading the thinie on the bottom, and they included the news in regards to Pakistani Cricket, just how big is Cricket in Russia anyhow???
It's completely irrelevent what Tsar Nicholas may have been guilty of or not. His family were guilty of nothing but being related to him yet were murdered in an innexcusable totally unjustified anti-Christian hate crime by Marxist religious bigots who created a tyrannical Frankenstein monster regime responsible murdering tens of millions of human beings in Russia and around the world to steal their property and have left a dying Russia with negative population growth
Nicholas II was a racist and an anti-semite. Consider the words of Count Witte: "To the Japanese His Majesty was in the habit of referring as macacoes (monkeys), using this term even in official documents. The English he called Jews. 'An Englishman,' he liked to repeat, 'is a zhid (Jew).' "
Shocking that a head of state could display so much racism and anti-semitism. A disgrace that such a low life occupied the throne once occupied by the great Peter - I.
@1mrnewman hey,Imbesil,they did not live in a Specie intergrated society that you do,The Japs are a different Specie and they are evil They have started a lot of Bloody Wars and a lot of Pornographic stuff.
It is very anti-Christian, racist and hypocritical that all the prisoners and executioners were JEWS of the Romanov family! While the jews complain about your poor 5 million dying in WW2, your communist Jews killed more than 50 million christians only in Russia and more around other parts of europe.
@andjelicd70 only jews were bolsheviks??? there were georgians,latvians,finns,mongols and god knows what in the rank of the CHEKA and later NKVD. Bolshevik society was feeding on feelings of hate and revenge by societies scum...like Stalin,Jezov,Lenin and other pure criminals.
that father grigori/rasputin character is not Godful but a black magic sorceror. YUCK. probably did not actually die but flits about the planet and causes aditional trouble and disruption. when he is he actually leaving for good? should have happened by now. too many similar morons catering to his brand of "fun" and "miracles"....
Typical Russia today, only half truths if that. They weren’t shot dead, they were bayonetted to death and made to watch each other’s executions, then they tried to burn and destroy the bodies with chemicals so no one would find out what happened.
@heatflash888 what the hell kind of American lies did you read in school. That is nowhere near what happened. Typical American jumping to conclusions with little to no facts.
At least the russian judicial system couldn't get this wrong as the world is them as there are Romanov's whom were or still living in Spain also Prince Michael of kent whom is too a direct descendant of the Romanov family too so the russian judicial system couldn't mask anything at all and I must applaud them for doing the investigation's with the dignity and respect this family deserved. Also I think they would be proud of their gov I think.
@Amandandoug I have just listen to this video and it was fine for me maybe u need to update your windows program maybe? When u sort what problem u have on your computer this video makes interesting listening
My uncle was with Admiral Kolchak during the Bolshevik Revolution. They were to liberate the Tsar, but they arrived three days late and found no bodies. About twenty years later, my uncle was arrested by the Gestappo with 40 other white army officers. He was arrested for giving a speech denouncing both Hitler and Stalin and sent to Sachsenhausen. It was at Sachsenhausen where Yakov Stalin threw himself against the electric fence after his father said: We have no prisoners of war, only traitors.
In the 1920's, many Russians came to U.S. to avoid religious persecution in their homeland. One group founded Holy Trinity Monastery in Jordanville, New York. I visited years ago, and remember walking into the dining hall and seeing two large paintings of Nicholas and Alexandra on the wall. It was if time had stood still. The monks intended, in the 1920's, to "wait out" the revolution, then return to Russia. They thought the monarchy would be restored. Perhaps it will, as a constitutional one.
The Imperial Romanov family should not only be rehabilitated but also declared saint by the Pope himself. Then the successors must be restored to the throne of the Imperial Russia. Long live the Tzar!
@anaclet Why should the Roman Catholic Pope declare the Romanovs to be saints? They were Orthodox Christians, and the Russian Orthodox Church has already recognized their sainthood.
@lichtbroeder Well one more reason! Then the Romanovs would be saints twice, just reaffirming their sainthood. There only one Church and only one God. Long live the Tsar! Lang lebe der Kaiser!
British industrial revolution formed capitalism which divided capitalists and workers. Marx and Engels thought of communism. Tsar was responsible for causing the rise of communist revolution because of long lasting serfdom.
Please note that Czar Alexandr II freed the serfs BEFORE Abe Lincoln freed the American slaves. Yes, all Monarchs were and are political bullies, along with most modern politicians, progress was continuous throughout the 19th century toward positive reforms in Imperial Russia. The Rothchild banking Mafia unleashed Ulyanov to exact revenge on the Imperial family, then Lenin turned the tables on Rothschild. Rothschild & Cie are enemies to all Freedom Loving people around the world!
lenin was a terrorist in the fullest sense, allowing the killing of children and setting up the secret police. he was no better than an islamic jihadist.
trotsky was truer to international marxism, insisting that people be allowed to choose for themseves. had he instead of stalin ended up as leader, the soviet union might have avoided alienating the world while modernizing itself humanely.
The "international bankers", in particular ,the Rothschild family ,funded the bolshevik revolution ,it was a generations old vendetta between the Romanovs and the bankers , the royal family was killed ,both for control of the country and an act of revenge for Alexander the 1st ,blocking the World government attempt of the congress of Vienna 1815, and Alexander the 2cd ,siding with Abe Lincoln in 1864 : check "Rothschild Fever" Vid
whatever about Nicholas, his wife and children did not deserve to be killed for what he may have done. Women were very suppressed in the early 1900's and a child only knows what they are taught to believe.
@Ggirl91 - Well the tsar's wife was not oppressed. She had influence over her husband and she supported the worst sort of tyranny. She got what she deserved, I'm very sorry to say.
@TreblePop The Tsarina got what she deserved? Easy to say so in hindsight. Alexandra was a good wife and mother and she loved Russia. She like many believed that the Tsar ruled for the good of the people by God's will alone, and she no more supported tyranny than did Queen Victoria or any other monarch of the time. The Tsar was not a bad man. He WAS an inept ruler, and never really wanted the job. To understand him in part, look at what happened to his liberal and open minded grandfather.
no.. sorry, but it is wrong,.. America is not USA,,.. maybe that´s the confusion in the post.. USA is in America.. or exactly in North America as you said, .. but if you write that America was invlolved, you are including many countries (north, mitle and south America) and if you say North america you could be meaning Canada, USA or Mexico.. and i do not think that Canada or mexico were involver.. ;))
America refers to the United States, and it always has - you are wrong. If you want to refer to North America, you say North America. If you want to refer to South America, you say South America. If you want to refer to both you say the Americas. America is commonly used to refer to the United States and no other country, the end.
The only ones who 'commonly' use 'America' to refer to the US are you arrogant, self-centered 'Americans' and English speakers. For us, America stands for the full continent and the United States are just one of its sovereign countries.
Actually you do, or you would have ignored my post. This kind of answers only shows how egolatric and self-centered you are. And then you ask why some things happen...
Some things? Being egocentric doesn't really deserve the 'some things' we've asked why about. Also, we are the hegemon, so technically we are number one. We have 25% of the worlds production, over 50% of its military expenditures, and one of the most stable political systems that exist. We are America, if you deny America in modern society equates to the United States, it simply makes you ignorant. These are facts.
@muthafakataka2 It is true that "America" once referred to the entire "new world", but "America" and "United States" have been synonymous for almost two centuries, and even Europeans (including non-English speaking) have long used these terms in this way. Easy for you to call Americans arrogant and self centered, yet I'll wager that the U.S. has given the world a lot more than your country has. Your online name says a lot about you. Have a big chip on your shoulder?
@lichtbroeder Certainly not yours. America & US "have been synonymous" since the US historians wrote the books (at a time when the US and Haiti were the only independent part of America - although the US didn't recognize Haiti out of racism). I'm not discussing what the US has "given to" (or taken from) the world; but you despising our country (or any other country not named US) just shows how right we are.
@muthafakataka2 Sorry, but it is you who are doing the despising. You speak of U.S. racism? Your country of Costa Rica greatly mistreated native people in the past. You accuse the U.S. of co-opting the name "America" for itself? Between 1823 and 1839, your country was part of "The Federal Republic of Central AMERICA", a name chosen by Spain. You speak of bad parts to our history? We, unlike you, have not had juntas and dictators. Before finger pointing and blaming, clean your own house.
@lichtbroeder Wow, a history lesson...! Once as an independent nation, Costa Rica did never recognize slavery (now tell me when did the US finally got rid of it). Mistreatment of the native people was performed by Spanish and British troops, although the US continued it blatantly (remember Little Big Horn?)... Many civil rights were granted in Costa Rica long before the US. Of course there was the ocassional dictator (one in the last 120 years), but now tell me what Nixon and Bush Jr. were...
@lichtbroeder Wow, a history lesson! OK, once Costa Rica was an independent nation, it did NEVER have slavery (now tell me what happened 40 years later in the US). Mistreatment of the natives, conducted by Spanish and British troops alike, was blatantly continued in the US (Little Big Horn, anyone?). And yes, there was the occassional dictator (one in the last 120 years - don't misrepresent events), but now tell me what were Nixon and the 'democraticly elected' Bush Jr.
@muthafakataka2 Yes, a history lesson, which you've given several of already., so get off your pompous, high horse. America historically has had low points as well as high points, but NO country (including yours) is exempt from this. That was my point. You have a chip on your shoulder and enjoy bashing the United States. Go for it. Be the poor, despised "victim". Tell us your tales of woe and enumerate our "sins". It won't make you - or Costa Rica - any the better for it.
@lichtbroeder Completely left without arguments. I'm not arguing about the perfection of any nation (but rather at the ones who thinks of themselves as the ONLY worthy nation at all, and actually find pride in their lowest moments). I'm actually sympathetic for the US due to family reasons, but hate this self-centered attitude of brats like you, who act like there's nothing to be appreciated south of Texas.
@muthafakataka2 You certainly have an inferiority complex. Anyone reading my comments to you will not find one instance of me looking down on your country or any country. My parents came from Germany and Netherlands. They struggled to build a life, and I empathize with all people who do. You berate all Americans (me included) by using a reverse logic that employs the very same demeaning tactics that you say "we" use against any country "south of Texas". I respect Costa Rica. You, I do not.
@lichtbroeder Thanks for finally showing any sort of respect for Costa Rica. But I still wonder where did you get your Psychology PH.
BTW, my grandpa came from the US to Costa Rica, and his grandpas came from both Germany and the Netherlands, too. So I have no reason to "berate" all US citizens, as you could have told if you ever finished reading my comments. I just can't call US citizens "Americans" like if I wasn't a Central "American" or a Latin "American". That said, LONG LIVE AMERICA!
@lichtbroeder PD I care absolutely nothing about having or not your respect. Not having it will do me no wrong, and having it will not make me any better. But believe it or not, I got your points. I hope you are capable enough of getting mine without being blinded.
mm.. i do not think so.. maybe it is a little bit different to lear geography in USA,.. but America is a continent.. and it is wire to read America if you mean USA.. that´s different.. as a dip. ing. know it ;)) just cultural differences !
There is no continent called America. There is North America and South America, or together they are 'the Americas'. America refers to the United States. Seriously, even your own Chancellor has referred to us as America. Every major figure has at least called the United States 'America' once in their career. I'm right, you're ignorant, shut up.
Lenin in revenge for his brother being hung. He murdered people and was hung for it. The children of NIcholas were killed because their name was Romanoff. How can you just kill children who were innocent of anything?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What is wrong with people? This was a loving family! the problem started with the French revolution! Sovereinty is being done with! GOD BLESS THE QUEEN of ENGLAND! Wake up America! Maybe what we need is someone to look up to, instead of corrupt pollutions! Take notice they should be called Pollutionist!
What the heck? Communism or No communism What's wrong here is plain and simple. Violence and Hatred in either side will only result in endless wars and confrontations. Try Loving each other you've got nothing to lose.
Amen!! Alexander II's violent death is perhaps the most important, most overlooked death in modern history - had he not died so soon, he would have given Russia a constitution, and the history of planet earth in 20th century would have been VERY different - communism would likely never have come to be.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I can't tell you about leaders of russian revolution but the french wasn't good for us. They were all silly and violent. Napoleon Bonaparte stopped the slaughter.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Only those who agree with Lenin, Sverdlov, Goldman (Emma), Stalin, Trostsky & Dzjerhinsky ideals will think them heros, but those of a rational mind recognize those men to be on the same level as Adolf Hitler - egotistical, homicidal meglomaniacs who murdered and corrupted thousands of people during and after their lives ended. They are now facing God's wrath!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Now YOU KNOW IN THE END IT ALL COMES OUT IN THE WASH! They WERE EXECUTED FOR DEMOCRACY!!!!! THIS WAS PART OF THE "TAKE OVER" OF THE MONARCHY!!!! It WASNT THE RUSSIANS IT WAS THE MOTHER FUCKERS WHO CONTROLLED EUROPE!!! Now THIS IS THE SHIT THAT Adolf HITLER WAS TRYING TO STOP! SLAVERY AND EUGENICS!!!! AND ENGLAND'S CHURCHILL WAS ALL ABOUT THAT SHIT!
IT WAS MURDER! NOT EXICUTION!! and if you would just please look this family up you'll know the truth... i know them better than anyone else in the world for personal reasons so this is the truth.
i was going through some things... and found something of maria she wrote about innocence and how her and Anya knew what was coming and that all as there father has done was being notified WAY to late before he could do anything!... before you comment back to me i heartly ask don't
You know nothing of history, their was a full vrdict and trail carried out, and that was to be their fate, although you do have one thing right they were executed because of democracy, although thats ntheir own fault because they had already had two revolutions before hand and the russian familie had still not changed their ways. Oh except they had introduced a fake goverment the dumark which was still controlled by the tsars. Bitch
First, the word is trial not trail. Second, where did the trial take place, who was the defense attorney for the Czar, what evidence was presented against the Czar? Also, why were the children murdered?
Agin I have to say this, not all the children died. Scientists are still looking into what happened to anastasia and ay that she was not executed. They believe she was out for a stroll and saw her family getting taken away, and ran for help, when she got back her house was empty. They are looking into if the executors found anastasia or if she excaped.
Nicholas 2 was the "Criminal" if anyone was. Not the children. Little Alexi died last and he was killed in a horriable way. The reds ccould have exiled them. The reds hurt not just the Russian People but the world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Romanovs were a very good family. The many books I have read about them all indicated what fine people they were in everything they did. Their murder is one of the greatest tragedies in history. We will not forget.
@Yuletidy did you know that Lenin's reign was just as bloody? he and Stalin weren't little angels, and Russia suffered way too much, and still suffers.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Do you think that killing children is something good? You, and all those who claim this not deserve a better end they did. The Soviet regime was nothing compared to the Romanov empire. Long live the romanovs =) (Sorry for my bad english ;) )
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i say if the US was to go to war with Russia then the first thing to do is start a revolution then invade and put the Tsar's closest relatives in power
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what happened to them was so sad even it was 89 yrs. ago i can still feel the pain.on how they suffered,especially to the children.i love this family... they makes me cry...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I understand your pain, I feel it myself. But we muust let it go. We must also beware of the curse of Maria Vladimirovna. That woman is a living embarrassment to the memory of Nicky, Alex, their children, and every single Romanov victim of the Russian Revolution. Do your homework, like I did mine!!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The massacre at Ekaterinburg was a tragedy, but we must forgive, forget, let go, move on, and ask God to bless Russia with a new Tsar who will unite all of the 15 former soviet republics and who will reign under God and according to the teachings of the Bible. What Russia need is modern day Peter the Great, who is at the same time a modern day St. Paul. If only Russia had someone like me...Pray for Mother Russia and her people.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I am a monarchist, but I also believe that monarchs should only reign if they're truly seeing to it that their people are being cared for and not starvning and living in poverty.
well then put a Tsar or Tsarina in power because thats whats going on his Russia unless u think ppl dying in moscow and the murderers getting away with it is ok and old ppl can't afford to buy the pills they need to stay alive and ppl living very poor and begging for money
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Make me Tsar and there shall be peace and everlasting jubilance in Russia. I have a dream that one day there shall be no rascism in Russia. I believe that rascism will only divide Russia and the CIS and will prevent unification. Accept all of the ethnicities as Russians as long as they swear allegiance to the motherland.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nikolasha's brother, Grand Duke Peter has a grandson, Prince Nikolai Romanovich Romanov and he is the head of the Russian imperial house, not that vindictive Maria. Do your homework people, I do agree that Romanovs have been honored quite well and that they were not vicyims of political oppression.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich and his family are now and should always be recognized until the people have a chance to vote, as the head of ths Romanov family.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
how about that. Maria Vladimirovna the so called head of the house of romanov(abomitable bitch) want to make demands. Perhaps you all aren't aware of who this woman is. Maria's grandfather grand duke kiril vladimirovich abandoned empress alexandra and her children and led his troops into petrograd with a red band on his arm declaring the Tsar's abdication. Maria and the vladimirovich clan of the house of romanov are indeed responsible for the death of Nikoai II and his family.
Few revolutions are bloodless. It is tragic what happened but we all have to accept that it did. I doubt if the Romanov dynasty will ever to be invited back to be heads of state in Russia. It is too long ago and do the majority really want it?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nicholas wasn't responsible for the killing of any peasants. He wasn't even THERE on Bloody Sunday. He didn't instruct ANYONE to kill ANYONE. Good God. You people think you're smart but you don't know anything about the Romanovs. If you would actually learn about him and read his diaries and letters you would look a little educated on the real Nicholas. What does it even matter now? The family never should've been killed.
No one should die they way they did. How they treated the family was utterly heartless. They posed no threat to any revolution. They abdicated the throne and gave in. There's nothing Nicholas could've done. All he wanted was to live out his days in peace with his family. Of course the children were innocent! They completely destroyed their lives. It makes me sick to even think about these bastards.
It was nessesary. The revolution could not continue with a figure head that white forces could gather around. They were not innocent, and they were enemies of the people. Get over it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i know his royal family was nice u want to know how Tsar Nicholis the I died he died when a bomb exploded he wasn't injured but some peasent was and he went tried to see if he was ok then another bomb went off and killed him now is that nice or not u be the judge giving up ur life to try and save anothers the royal family was innocent and Lenin's family should be persicuted
blame the person who was incharge on Bloody Sunday in St.Petersburg the year was like 1905or something and their weren't cell phones or even good phones then so how could the Tsar know he knew when he got back but blame the person who was incharge on Bloody sunday
Imho, the moscow's stance on this is correct. All though I think that Tsar and his family were an ideological symbol that was in need of termination, I also agree that it was a plain and simple murder.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Congest, its easy for you to say. Your child isn't bleeding all the time. Your family wasn't shot in cold blood without a trial. It's sorta like the holocaust.the germans tried to cover it up. and now some of the people are trying to say the romanovs shouldn't be rehibilated. i pity you.
You can't be serious. Did you really just compare the murder of a family of autocratic tyrants with the industrialized slaughter of six million innocent jews? Are you really defending the same Nicholas II that was responsible for the murder of over a thousand unarmed protesters in St. Petersburg during Bloody Sunday? If so, your moral priorities are severely out of whack.
The Bolsheviks had valid reasons to eliminate the Romanovs. The Czechoslovak Legions, working under the orders of imperial France, were fast approaching the city of Yekaterinburg, and there was ample reason to believe that they might try to free the Romanovs and reinstall them in power.
The tsarist system was a cancer afflicting the poor Russian people. Do you have any idea how brutal and savage the Romanovs were? Do you have any sympathy for the hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Russians who were forced to bleed and die on the battlefields in an inter-imperialist war that had no popular support and was prosecuted in the interests of the aristocracy?
I bet you're the type of reactionary who would also approve of "rehabilitating" abominable figures like King George III, Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI. You'll bend over backwards to excuse the crimes of the wealthy and royal.
Revolutions are violent and excessive, as they need to be in order to succeed. No revolution where one class overthrows another (i.e. a social revolution rather than a merely political one) has been conducted without massive bloodshed. Not the American Revolution, not the French Revolution, and not the Bolshevik Revolution.
Admitting their excessiveness, however, is not an argument against revolutions. It is, rather, an argument against the reactionary and anti-progressive classes who try to prevent the fundamental changes that are needed for society to move forward.
All that you have stated here convicts the criminal Bolshevics for the murder of the Romanov family, lest they be restored to the Throne. But regarding the revolutions you cited, all except the American revolution purposed to overhrow and replace the existing order, the American Revolution's purpose was to preserve the system they had worked hard to create.
@tubamirum007 Americans didn't work hard to preserve "the system" that they had created. They sought to create a new one. The old one was built with as much British blood and sweat as American. During the French and Indian Wars, colonists were only too happy to have the King's soldiers protecting them, and believed in the Divine right of kings to rule. And initially, most colonists did NOT support revolution. America had a king!
@lichtbroeder "What we meant in going for those Redcoats was this: We always governed ourselves and we always meant to. They didn't mean we should."
Levi Preston, veteran of April 19, 1775 at Lexington
"The people of the colonies are descendants of Englishmen. The people are Protestants, a persuasion not only favourable to liberty, but built upon it. Seek peace and ensue it; Leave the Americans as they anciently stood."
-- Edmund Burke, Address to the English House of Commons, April 19, 1774
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
well not all the romanovs were bad i mean a romanovs freed u from rule by the mongols and i forget her name this one Tsarina was a great ruler and theirs a couple more u had both bad and good ones
They directly murdered them .. they didnt even gave Nicholas II a trial... all on the basement of Ipatiev house on the night of July 17 , 1918 .. All of the companies (even the maids and a dog..) were not sparred and all well brutally murdered! :( ..
kryztyn127 1 month ago
Царь Николай является великимъ человекомъ въ исторіи.
averyhse 2 months ago
My grandma escaped. They new it was going on.
prozzaktv 3 months ago
What I found strange is that I was reading the thinie on the bottom, and they included the news in regards to Pakistani Cricket, just how big is Cricket in Russia anyhow???
robinalexlewis 4 months ago
So...it was Lenin who gave the order?
I understand I never loved to study any references to him.
sinoples 5 months ago
It's completely irrelevent what Tsar Nicholas may have been guilty of or not. His family were guilty of nothing but being related to him yet were murdered in an innexcusable totally unjustified anti-Christian hate crime by Marxist religious bigots who created a tyrannical Frankenstein monster regime responsible murdering tens of millions of human beings in Russia and around the world to steal their property and have left a dying Russia with negative population growth
Texasjim2007 5 months ago
@Texasjim2007
Let me tell you, Sir; since chldhood I believe on the restauration of Monarchy in Russia. May not the Romanov....but some parallel branch.
looking at the impending events...I not see any other solution for Orthodox identity...may a good example for western European agnostiques dinasties.
sinoples 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
about 20 million civilians were also murdered by the bulshavic parasites..
yup5220 7 months ago
Sound is not so good.
kckc1975 9 months ago
Nicholas II was a racist and an anti-semite. Consider the words of Count Witte: "To the Japanese His Majesty was in the habit of referring as macacoes (monkeys), using this term even in official documents. The English he called Jews. 'An Englishman,' he liked to repeat, 'is a zhid (Jew).' "
Shocking that a head of state could display so much racism and anti-semitism. A disgrace that such a low life occupied the throne once occupied by the great Peter - I.
1mrnewman 9 months ago
@1mrnewman hey,Imbesil,they did not live in a Specie intergrated society that you do,The Japs are a different Specie and they are evil They have started a lot of Bloody Wars and a lot of Pornographic stuff.
DeutscheRossiya 9 months ago
It is very anti-Christian, racist and hypocritical that all the prisoners and executioners were JEWS of the Romanov family! While the jews complain about your poor 5 million dying in WW2, your communist Jews killed more than 50 million christians only in Russia and more around other parts of europe.
andjelicd70 6 months ago 3
@andjelicd70 :O( , yes but as we see, COUSINS REMAIN !
SpringChatty 6 months ago
@andjelicd70 only jews were bolsheviks??? there were georgians,latvians,finns,mongols and god knows what in the rank of the CHEKA and later NKVD. Bolshevik society was feeding on feelings of hate and revenge by societies scum...like Stalin,Jezov,Lenin and other pure criminals.
am1966ath 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that father grigori/rasputin character is not Godful but a black magic sorceror. YUCK. probably did not actually die but flits about the planet and causes aditional trouble and disruption. when he is he actually leaving for good? should have happened by now. too many similar morons catering to his brand of "fun" and "miracles"....
deritpeehs 11 months ago
please let us be friends with the Romanovs
ladypammie 11 months ago
can anyone explain to me, what is rehabilitation?
junehebe 11 months ago
Typical Russia today, only half truths if that. They weren’t shot dead, they were bayonetted to death and made to watch each other’s executions, then they tried to burn and destroy the bodies with chemicals so no one would find out what happened.
heatflash888 1 year ago
@heatflash888 what the hell kind of American lies did you read in school. That is nowhere near what happened. Typical American jumping to conclusions with little to no facts.
MarshalGeorgiZhukov 1 year ago
@MarshalGeorgiZhukov no, it is true. im Russian and i confirm this/ тебе самому бы историю поучить не мешало
358423 1 year ago
It was a murder, plain and simple.
spacedancer 1 year ago
At least the russian judicial system couldn't get this wrong as the world is them as there are Romanov's whom were or still living in Spain also Prince Michael of kent whom is too a direct descendant of the Romanov family too so the russian judicial system couldn't mask anything at all and I must applaud them for doing the investigation's with the dignity and respect this family deserved. Also I think they would be proud of their gov I think.
DanielR305 1 year ago
no volume =(
Amandandoug 1 year ago
@Amandandoug I have just listen to this video and it was fine for me maybe u need to update your windows program maybe? When u sort what problem u have on your computer this video makes interesting listening
DanielR305 1 year ago
My uncle was with Admiral Kolchak during the Bolshevik Revolution. They were to liberate the Tsar, but they arrived three days late and found no bodies. About twenty years later, my uncle was arrested by the Gestappo with 40 other white army officers. He was arrested for giving a speech denouncing both Hitler and Stalin and sent to Sachsenhausen. It was at Sachsenhausen where Yakov Stalin threw himself against the electric fence after his father said: We have no prisoners of war, only traitors.
Nguli34689 1 year ago
IT WAS MURDER
APRIL62318 1 year ago
In the 1920's, many Russians came to U.S. to avoid religious persecution in their homeland. One group founded Holy Trinity Monastery in Jordanville, New York. I visited years ago, and remember walking into the dining hall and seeing two large paintings of Nicholas and Alexandra on the wall. It was if time had stood still. The monks intended, in the 1920's, to "wait out" the revolution, then return to Russia. They thought the monarchy would be restored. Perhaps it will, as a constitutional one.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
Hot for no even one word
TheNataliaRR 1 year ago
Viva el Sar ! Larga vida a los Romanov.
edwinpella 1 year ago
The Imperial Romanov family should not only be rehabilitated but also declared saint by the Pope himself. Then the successors must be restored to the throne of the Imperial Russia. Long live the Tzar!
anaclet 1 year ago
@anaclet That won't happen, I think Putin would want to be Czar.
Consumerofknowledge 1 year ago
@anaclet Why should the Roman Catholic Pope declare the Romanovs to be saints? They were Orthodox Christians, and the Russian Orthodox Church has already recognized their sainthood.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Well one more reason! Then the Romanovs would be saints twice, just reaffirming their sainthood. There only one Church and only one God. Long live the Tsar! Lang lebe der Kaiser!
anaclet 1 year ago
We should do the same with the International Banksters -and political elitists - the real enemies of all peoples around the world.
Fight for Freedom!
kimmijo 1 year ago 3
British industrial revolution formed capitalism which divided capitalists and workers. Marx and Engels thought of communism. Tsar was responsible for causing the rise of communist revolution because of long lasting serfdom.
HariRina 1 year ago 2
Please note that Czar Alexandr II freed the serfs BEFORE Abe Lincoln freed the American slaves. Yes, all Monarchs were and are political bullies, along with most modern politicians, progress was continuous throughout the 19th century toward positive reforms in Imperial Russia. The Rothchild banking Mafia unleashed Ulyanov to exact revenge on the Imperial family, then Lenin turned the tables on Rothschild. Rothschild & Cie are enemies to all Freedom Loving people around the world!
tubamirum007 1 year ago
lenin was a terrorist in the fullest sense, allowing the killing of children and setting up the secret police. he was no better than an islamic jihadist.
trotsky was truer to international marxism, insisting that people be allowed to choose for themseves. had he instead of stalin ended up as leader, the soviet union might have avoided alienating the world while modernizing itself humanely.
bademoxy 1 year ago
oh..Tsar..VICTIM OF POLITICAL SHIT-SSION ?
orgthingy 1 year ago
The "international bankers", in particular ,the Rothschild family ,funded the bolshevik revolution ,it was a generations old vendetta between the Romanovs and the bankers , the royal family was killed ,both for control of the country and an act of revenge for Alexander the 1st ,blocking the World government attempt of the congress of Vienna 1815, and Alexander the 2cd ,siding with Abe Lincoln in 1864 : check "Rothschild Fever" Vid
7Whitewolf3 2 years ago
whatever about Nicholas, his wife and children did not deserve to be killed for what he may have done. Women were very suppressed in the early 1900's and a child only knows what they are taught to believe.
Ggirl91 2 years ago
Over 60 million were murdered by the Communists in Russia. Get to the back of the line.
DonMeaker 1 year ago
@Ggirl91 - Well the tsar's wife was not oppressed. She had influence over her husband and she supported the worst sort of tyranny. She got what she deserved, I'm very sorry to say.
TreblePop 1 year ago
@TreblePop The Tsarina got what she deserved? Easy to say so in hindsight. Alexandra was a good wife and mother and she loved Russia. She like many believed that the Tsar ruled for the good of the people by God's will alone, and she no more supported tyranny than did Queen Victoria or any other monarch of the time. The Tsar was not a bad man. He WAS an inept ruler, and never really wanted the job. To understand him in part, look at what happened to his liberal and open minded grandfather.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
Too bad well you raped the common people everyday & now you want compensation it should be give or take ten generations of manual labor. Sound fair.
ComradeMoreau 2 years ago
so are the remaining familly members really rich or?? one would think they would recieve the riches or any other valuables. any help me out??
purelazyness 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the Tsar was killed by evil fucking american dogs.
Edgewood126 2 years ago
Perhaps by British and American inaction, but America was not directly involved.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
from America was just USA involved.
Hallosmiling3 2 years ago
America is the United States. If you mean the continent, that would be North America.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
no.. sorry, but it is wrong,.. America is not USA,,.. maybe that´s the confusion in the post.. USA is in America.. or exactly in North America as you said, .. but if you write that America was invlolved, you are including many countries (north, mitle and south America) and if you say North america you could be meaning Canada, USA or Mexico.. and i do not think that Canada or mexico were involver.. ;))
Hallosmiling3 2 years ago
America refers to the United States, and it always has - you are wrong. If you want to refer to North America, you say North America. If you want to refer to South America, you say South America. If you want to refer to both you say the Americas. America is commonly used to refer to the United States and no other country, the end.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
The only ones who 'commonly' use 'America' to refer to the US are you arrogant, self-centered 'Americans' and English speakers. For us, America stands for the full continent and the United States are just one of its sovereign countries.
muthafakataka2 2 years ago 2
Well, no one gives a shit about Costa Rica.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
Actually you do, or you would have ignored my post. This kind of answers only shows how egolatric and self-centered you are. And then you ask why some things happen...
muthafakataka2 2 years ago
BTW, my grandfather was what you'd call 'American'...
muthafakataka2 2 years ago
Some things? Being egocentric doesn't really deserve the 'some things' we've asked why about. Also, we are the hegemon, so technically we are number one. We have 25% of the worlds production, over 50% of its military expenditures, and one of the most stable political systems that exist. We are America, if you deny America in modern society equates to the United States, it simply makes you ignorant. These are facts.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
@muthafakataka2 It is true that "America" once referred to the entire "new world", but "America" and "United States" have been synonymous for almost two centuries, and even Europeans (including non-English speaking) have long used these terms in this way. Easy for you to call Americans arrogant and self centered, yet I'll wager that the U.S. has given the world a lot more than your country has. Your online name says a lot about you. Have a big chip on your shoulder?
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Certainly not yours. America & US "have been synonymous" since the US historians wrote the books (at a time when the US and Haiti were the only independent part of America - although the US didn't recognize Haiti out of racism). I'm not discussing what the US has "given to" (or taken from) the world; but you despising our country (or any other country not named US) just shows how right we are.
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
@muthafakataka2 Sorry, but it is you who are doing the despising. You speak of U.S. racism? Your country of Costa Rica greatly mistreated native people in the past. You accuse the U.S. of co-opting the name "America" for itself? Between 1823 and 1839, your country was part of "The Federal Republic of Central AMERICA", a name chosen by Spain. You speak of bad parts to our history? We, unlike you, have not had juntas and dictators. Before finger pointing and blaming, clean your own house.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Wow, a history lesson...! Once as an independent nation, Costa Rica did never recognize slavery (now tell me when did the US finally got rid of it). Mistreatment of the native people was performed by Spanish and British troops, although the US continued it blatantly (remember Little Big Horn?)... Many civil rights were granted in Costa Rica long before the US. Of course there was the ocassional dictator (one in the last 120 years), but now tell me what Nixon and Bush Jr. were...
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Wow, a history lesson! OK, once Costa Rica was an independent nation, it did NEVER have slavery (now tell me what happened 40 years later in the US). Mistreatment of the natives, conducted by Spanish and British troops alike, was blatantly continued in the US (Little Big Horn, anyone?). And yes, there was the occassional dictator (one in the last 120 years - don't misrepresent events), but now tell me what were Nixon and the 'democraticly elected' Bush Jr.
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
@muthafakataka2 Yes, a history lesson, which you've given several of already., so get off your pompous, high horse. America historically has had low points as well as high points, but NO country (including yours) is exempt from this. That was my point. You have a chip on your shoulder and enjoy bashing the United States. Go for it. Be the poor, despised "victim". Tell us your tales of woe and enumerate our "sins". It won't make you - or Costa Rica - any the better for it.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Completely left without arguments. I'm not arguing about the perfection of any nation (but rather at the ones who thinks of themselves as the ONLY worthy nation at all, and actually find pride in their lowest moments). I'm actually sympathetic for the US due to family reasons, but hate this self-centered attitude of brats like you, who act like there's nothing to be appreciated south of Texas.
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
Comment removed
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@muthafakataka2 You certainly have an inferiority complex. Anyone reading my comments to you will not find one instance of me looking down on your country or any country. My parents came from Germany and Netherlands. They struggled to build a life, and I empathize with all people who do. You berate all Americans (me included) by using a reverse logic that employs the very same demeaning tactics that you say "we" use against any country "south of Texas". I respect Costa Rica. You, I do not.
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder Thanks for finally showing any sort of respect for Costa Rica. But I still wonder where did you get your Psychology PH.
BTW, my grandpa came from the US to Costa Rica, and his grandpas came from both Germany and the Netherlands, too. So I have no reason to "berate" all US citizens, as you could have told if you ever finished reading my comments. I just can't call US citizens "Americans" like if I wasn't a Central "American" or a Latin "American". That said, LONG LIVE AMERICA!
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder PD I care absolutely nothing about having or not your respect. Not having it will do me no wrong, and having it will not make me any better. But believe it or not, I got your points. I hope you are capable enough of getting mine without being blinded.
muthafakataka2 1 year ago
I will give you an example of why I think you're confused.
If you say, for example:
America launched an invasion of France along with Canada, Britain, and the Commonwealth forces- this is referring to the United States.
If you say, for example:
The Americas are currently engaged in the largest war on drugs in history - this is referring to both continents since it is plural.
I understand it can be confusing, but trust me, I know what I'm talking about as an International Affairs major.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
mm.. i do not think so.. maybe it is a little bit different to lear geography in USA,.. but America is a continent.. and it is wire to read America if you mean USA.. that´s different.. as a dip. ing. know it ;)) just cultural differences !
Hallosmiling3 2 years ago
There is no continent called America. There is North America and South America, or together they are 'the Americas'. America refers to the United States. Seriously, even your own Chancellor has referred to us as America. Every major figure has at least called the United States 'America' once in their career. I'm right, you're ignorant, shut up.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
oh my God,.. you should correct the books .. they are wrong !! LOL !
Hallosmiling3 2 years ago
Could you please cite a modern book that refers to either continent as simply America.
Thanks.
lastminuteregret 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there poor sool's the children should have never been killed they did not understande what was happening this is so sad
anastasiagirl1342 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Very good Video! Thank you my good friend! Bozhe Tsaria Hrani! God save the Tsar!
Jame243 2 years ago
The Russian Imperial Family were brutally murdered by the bolsheviks it was in no way justified.
Monarchist1990 2 years ago
I hope the Russian Empire is restored. Then they can put the Soviet Era behind and go back to the best form of Government there is. Monarchy!
Xandrixo 2 years ago 2
England Crown refused to help to Romanovs but so quickly bought some of the jewels, easter eggs, tiaras...=(
hereder01 2 years ago
democracy is a bitch...
LONG LIVE THE NEW BYZANTINE EMPIRE SLAVIA
gaastra12 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And Stalin didn't do any of that?
Independence4Britain 2 years ago
The Tsar and his family were killed by
Lenin in revenge for his brother being hung. He murdered people and was hung for it. The children of NIcholas were killed because their name was Romanoff. How can you just kill children who were innocent of anything?
Geniebeanie1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
all the bolshevics should have been hung and all their western supporters.
dule140 2 years ago
good,, but let not forget that king of England refused to give hospitality the his Cousin and to the Romanov family....
tha history was not so clear,, Englan and France didn't help to save the Russian Empire. anyway the truth will come out... I hope
scarletpimpernel1793 2 years ago
They did and so did the United States and several other countries, it was too late, unfortunately.
Independence4Britain 2 years ago 6
If we weren't at war we would have most certaintly taken them in
gangstamillion 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is wrong with people? This was a loving family! the problem started with the French revolution! Sovereinty is being done with! GOD BLESS THE QUEEN of ENGLAND! Wake up America! Maybe what we need is someone to look up to, instead of corrupt pollutions! Take notice they should be called Pollutionist!
sweetdeemomma 2 years ago
What the heck? Communism or No communism What's wrong here is plain and simple. Violence and Hatred in either side will only result in endless wars and confrontations. Try Loving each other you've got nothing to lose.
RanKudo007 2 years ago 24
This has been flagged as spam show
@RanKudo007 love does not solve anything without God.
deritpeehs 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jesus bless the romanov always..i love the romanov family!!!
05angus 2 years ago
btho5531 -- Regime murdered them , WHY ? .. cause they were the ones who planed assasination oc Czar ,,,
aviomaster 2 years ago
The Romanovs were victims of 'political repression'! Talk about short memory. They seem to forget the thousands that the Imperial Regime murdered.
btho5531 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck bolshviks
aaronwa32 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Down with anarchy and communism, let truth always prevail!
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Last tsars family rehabilitated! : watch?v=mFmS9gbzgzQ
Take that all you dog shit eating commies!
pumaman1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and how dare u ppl down thumb adena539, u should listen to her, u might just learn soemthing!
RomanovLearner334 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why spam the ppl who care and pluss the ppl who cuss at tyhem who do u feel is better why do u ppl think death is the right answer!
RomanovLearner334 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Communism is the future! Workers of the world unite!
And seriously, fuck the tsar!
Bratyear 3 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How can you have such disrespect for somebody that has past away?
For real, saying "f--- the tsar" is unnecessary and childish.
lovemeorhateme151 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wish you would be dead.
RussianBoxer84 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The revolution was one of the greatest achievements of the 20th century. Long live Lenin!
Solidarity with the students and workers in Greece! Detroy capitalism!
Poketyus 3 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god save the tsar.
Romanov the great.
yokowich 3 years ago
случилось что Bullshit!!!!
belia1313 3 years ago
TSAR deserved death!!!
Ninelon 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are a sad person, death is never a good thing! how dare u think it is a ok thing
RomanovLearner334 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anarchists and communists deserve the type of punishment given towards the late Tsar Nikolai.
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the tsar`s could still be in power today, it was alexander III who destroyed thier chances after his fathers death.
Millar696 3 years ago
Amen!! Alexander II's violent death is perhaps the most important, most overlooked death in modern history - had he not died so soon, he would have given Russia a constitution, and the history of planet earth in 20th century would have been VERY different - communism would likely never have come to be.
mrlopez2681 3 years ago
Long live Lenin, Sverdlov, Trotsky & Dzjerzhinsky !
My utmost respect for the leaders of the Russian Revolutions (and French, too).
Nepal the way to go.
Leibo07 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't tell you about leaders of russian revolution but the french wasn't good for us. They were all silly and violent. Napoleon Bonaparte stopped the slaughter.
legorret1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Only those who agree with Lenin, Sverdlov, Goldman (Emma), Stalin, Trostsky & Dzjerhinsky ideals will think them heros, but those of a rational mind recognize those men to be on the same level as Adolf Hitler - egotistical, homicidal meglomaniacs who murdered and corrupted thousands of people during and after their lives ended. They are now facing God's wrath!
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Now YOU KNOW IN THE END IT ALL COMES OUT IN THE WASH! They WERE EXECUTED FOR DEMOCRACY!!!!! THIS WAS PART OF THE "TAKE OVER" OF THE MONARCHY!!!! It WASNT THE RUSSIANS IT WAS THE MOTHER FUCKERS WHO CONTROLLED EUROPE!!! Now THIS IS THE SHIT THAT Adolf HITLER WAS TRYING TO STOP! SLAVERY AND EUGENICS!!!! AND ENGLAND'S CHURCHILL WAS ALL ABOUT THAT SHIT!
JoanneChristie 3 years ago
IT WAS MURDER! NOT EXICUTION!! and if you would just please look this family up you'll know the truth... i know them better than anyone else in the world for personal reasons so this is the truth.
i was going through some things... and found something of maria she wrote about innocence and how her and Anya knew what was coming and that all as there father has done was being notified WAY to late before he could do anything!... before you comment back to me i heartly ask don't
adena539 3 years ago
You know nothing of history, their was a full vrdict and trail carried out, and that was to be their fate, although you do have one thing right they were executed because of democracy, although thats ntheir own fault because they had already had two revolutions before hand and the russian familie had still not changed their ways. Oh except they had introduced a fake goverment the dumark which was still controlled by the tsars. Bitch
Millar696 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ther certainly was not any trial or verdict. The Romanovs were executed because of democracy?!?!? Are you really this dumb?
mrlopez2681 3 years ago
First, the word is trial not trail. Second, where did the trial take place, who was the defense attorney for the Czar, what evidence was presented against the Czar? Also, why were the children murdered?
Jane1620 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God bless them, and may they rest in peace
Joans20thCentury 3 years ago
Agin I have to say this, not all the children died. Scientists are still looking into what happened to anastasia and ay that she was not executed. They believe she was out for a stroll and saw her family getting taken away, and ran for help, when she got back her house was empty. They are looking into if the executors found anastasia or if she excaped.
devilsdollyvennum 3 years ago
Everybody died, the bodies of maria and alexei were found last year.
Chofa1789 3 years ago 8
Yes, and the bodie of Anastasia were found in 1991.
AleksandrBarislav 3 years ago 6
YES THEY DID!!
The DNA results came in
RobotMice 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gloriam Aeternae to Czars Family!
Death to every communist!
fernardobriass 3 years ago
OF COURSE HE WAS A CRIMINAL, that doesn´t mean that their children were guilties
hochkelewinter 3 years ago
Nicholas 2 was the "Criminal" if anyone was. Not the children. Little Alexi died last and he was killed in a horriable way. The reds ccould have exiled them. The reds hurt not just the Russian People but the world.
theromanian19 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Romanovs were a very good family. The many books I have read about them all indicated what fine people they were in everything they did. Their murder is one of the greatest tragedies in history. We will not forget.
AleksandrBarislav 3 years ago
The Romanovs were shit! Tsarism is dead; get over it! Socialism and democracy are the future. Long live Lenin and Trotsky!
Yuletidy 3 years ago 7
Lenin and Trotsky were very bad. Killing children just to take power is really loose, I don't understand how you can respect them.
AleksandrBarislav 3 years ago
@Yuletidy did you know that Lenin's reign was just as bloody? he and Stalin weren't little angels, and Russia suffered way too much, and still suffers.
akissy 1 year ago
@Yuletidy What an imbecile.
rightgirlhere 1 year ago
fuck Tsar's family and fuck this channel!!!
trotskyist1917 4 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Do you think that killing children is something good? You, and all those who claim this not deserve a better end they did. The Soviet regime was nothing compared to the Romanov empire. Long live the romanovs =) (Sorry for my bad english ;) )
AleksandrBarislav 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i say if the US was to go to war with Russia then the first thing to do is start a revolution then invade and put the Tsar's closest relatives in power
Bati1307 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well said :)
Fuck communism, fuck lenin, and fuck trostsky, those child-killers.
Edam3000 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Can the rest of us fuck your family, you sick, murderous commie.
:D
Edam3000 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
those who spammed this messages is an idiot.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what happened to them was so sad even it was 89 yrs. ago i can still feel the pain.on how they suffered,especially to the children.i love this family... they makes me cry...
allenclevan 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I understand your pain, I feel it myself. But we muust let it go. We must also beware of the curse of Maria Vladimirovna. That woman is a living embarrassment to the memory of Nicky, Alex, their children, and every single Romanov victim of the Russian Revolution. Do your homework, like I did mine!!!!!
granddukedavell 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The massacre at Ekaterinburg was a tragedy, but we must forgive, forget, let go, move on, and ask God to bless Russia with a new Tsar who will unite all of the 15 former soviet republics and who will reign under God and according to the teachings of the Bible. What Russia need is modern day Peter the Great, who is at the same time a modern day St. Paul. If only Russia had someone like me...Pray for Mother Russia and her people.
granddukedavell 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am a monarchist, but I also believe that monarchs should only reign if they're truly seeing to it that their people are being cared for and not starvning and living in poverty.
granddukedavell 4 years ago
well then put a Tsar or Tsarina in power because thats whats going on his Russia unless u think ppl dying in moscow and the murderers getting away with it is ok and old ppl can't afford to buy the pills they need to stay alive and ppl living very poor and begging for money
Bati1307 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Make me Tsar and there shall be peace and everlasting jubilance in Russia. I have a dream that one day there shall be no rascism in Russia. I believe that rascism will only divide Russia and the CIS and will prevent unification. Accept all of the ethnicities as Russians as long as they swear allegiance to the motherland.
granddukedavell 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nikolasha's brother, Grand Duke Peter has a grandson, Prince Nikolai Romanovich Romanov and he is the head of the Russian imperial house, not that vindictive Maria. Do your homework people, I do agree that Romanovs have been honored quite well and that they were not vicyims of political oppression.
granddukedavell 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich and his family are now and should always be recognized until the people have a chance to vote, as the head of ths Romanov family.
granddukedavell 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how about that. Maria Vladimirovna the so called head of the house of romanov(abomitable bitch) want to make demands. Perhaps you all aren't aware of who this woman is. Maria's grandfather grand duke kiril vladimirovich abandoned empress alexandra and her children and led his troops into petrograd with a red band on his arm declaring the Tsar's abdication. Maria and the vladimirovich clan of the house of romanov are indeed responsible for the death of Nikoai II and his family.
granddukedavell 4 years ago
Few revolutions are bloodless. It is tragic what happened but we all have to accept that it did. I doubt if the Romanov dynasty will ever to be invited back to be heads of state in Russia. It is too long ago and do the majority really want it?
kernowoggie 4 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nicholas wasn't responsible for the killing of any peasants. He wasn't even THERE on Bloody Sunday. He didn't instruct ANYONE to kill ANYONE. Good God. You people think you're smart but you don't know anything about the Romanovs. If you would actually learn about him and read his diaries and letters you would look a little educated on the real Nicholas. What does it even matter now? The family never should've been killed.
AnastasiaExpert 4 years ago
No one should die they way they did. How they treated the family was utterly heartless. They posed no threat to any revolution. They abdicated the throne and gave in. There's nothing Nicholas could've done. All he wanted was to live out his days in peace with his family. Of course the children were innocent! They completely destroyed their lives. It makes me sick to even think about these bastards.
AnastasiaExpert 4 years ago
It was nessesary. The revolution could not continue with a figure head that white forces could gather around. They were not innocent, and they were enemies of the people. Get over it.
shaggydog14 4 years ago 5
well said
bigguy49b 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck you, you heartless cunt.
Edam3000 3 years ago
excuse me?
RobotMice 3 years ago
oh yea and like most of are innocent
thylacine07 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i know his royal family was nice u want to know how Tsar Nicholis the I died he died when a bomb exploded he wasn't injured but some peasent was and he went tried to see if he was ok then another bomb went off and killed him now is that nice or not u be the judge giving up ur life to try and save anothers the royal family was innocent and Lenin's family should be persicuted
Bati1307 3 years ago
blame the person who was incharge on Bloody Sunday in St.Petersburg the year was like 1905or something and their weren't cell phones or even good phones then so how could the Tsar know he knew when he got back but blame the person who was incharge on Bloody sunday
Bati1307 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think the childrens were innocent
What a shame
normandtardif 4 years ago
Imho, the moscow's stance on this is correct. All though I think that Tsar and his family were an ideological symbol that was in need of termination, I also agree that it was a plain and simple murder.
RmanDC 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Congest, its easy for you to say. Your child isn't bleeding all the time. Your family wasn't shot in cold blood without a trial. It's sorta like the holocaust.the germans tried to cover it up. and now some of the people are trying to say the romanovs shouldn't be rehibilated. i pity you.
sweetbabeh 4 years ago
You can't be serious. Did you really just compare the murder of a family of autocratic tyrants with the industrialized slaughter of six million innocent jews? Are you really defending the same Nicholas II that was responsible for the murder of over a thousand unarmed protesters in St. Petersburg during Bloody Sunday? If so, your moral priorities are severely out of whack.
(continued below)
Congest 4 years ago 10
The Bolsheviks had valid reasons to eliminate the Romanovs. The Czechoslovak Legions, working under the orders of imperial France, were fast approaching the city of Yekaterinburg, and there was ample reason to believe that they might try to free the Romanovs and reinstall them in power.
(continued below)
Congest 4 years ago 11
The tsarist system was a cancer afflicting the poor Russian people. Do you have any idea how brutal and savage the Romanovs were? Do you have any sympathy for the hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Russians who were forced to bleed and die on the battlefields in an inter-imperialist war that had no popular support and was prosecuted in the interests of the aristocracy?
(continued below)
Congest 4 years ago 12
I bet you're the type of reactionary who would also approve of "rehabilitating" abominable figures like King George III, Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI. You'll bend over backwards to excuse the crimes of the wealthy and royal.
(continued below)
Congest 4 years ago 9
Revolutions are violent and excessive, as they need to be in order to succeed. No revolution where one class overthrows another (i.e. a social revolution rather than a merely political one) has been conducted without massive bloodshed. Not the American Revolution, not the French Revolution, and not the Bolshevik Revolution.
(continued below)
Congest 4 years ago 14
Admitting their excessiveness, however, is not an argument against revolutions. It is, rather, an argument against the reactionary and anti-progressive classes who try to prevent the fundamental changes that are needed for society to move forward.
Congest 4 years ago 14
All that you have stated here convicts the criminal Bolshevics for the murder of the Romanov family, lest they be restored to the Throne. But regarding the revolutions you cited, all except the American revolution purposed to overhrow and replace the existing order, the American Revolution's purpose was to preserve the system they had worked hard to create.
tubamirum007 1 year ago
@tubamirum007 Americans didn't work hard to preserve "the system" that they had created. They sought to create a new one. The old one was built with as much British blood and sweat as American. During the French and Indian Wars, colonists were only too happy to have the King's soldiers protecting them, and believed in the Divine right of kings to rule. And initially, most colonists did NOT support revolution. America had a king!
lichtbroeder 1 year ago
@lichtbroeder "What we meant in going for those Redcoats was this: We always governed ourselves and we always meant to. They didn't mean we should."
Levi Preston, veteran of April 19, 1775 at Lexington
"The people of the colonies are descendants of Englishmen. The people are Protestants, a persuasion not only favourable to liberty, but built upon it. Seek peace and ensue it; Leave the Americans as they anciently stood."
-- Edmund Burke, Address to the English House of Commons, April 19, 1774
McVearryAnderCalcutt 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well not all the romanovs were bad i mean a romanovs freed u from rule by the mongols and i forget her name this one Tsarina was a great ruler and theirs a couple more u had both bad and good ones
Bati1307 3 years ago
Any body remember Joseph Stalin??
Mamasajo 2 years ago
it's not like he ordered it he sent the troops but not to cool blame the person who was the commanding officer at petersburg
Bati1307 3 years ago
Their deaths were no great loss for the world. Don't cry for them.
In the spirit of Sverdlov-
Long live Marxism!
RedTerror 4 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Congest, keep your comments like that to yourself
AldbroBev 4 years ago
I can say what I like, thank you very much. If you think the Tsarist system is so great, go ahead and make your case.
Congest 4 years ago