Added: 4 years ago
From: cistheta2007
Views: 32,511
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • that was from 1982. wow, 30 years ago and she nails it. i was in college in 82. we programed computers with punch cards. they would punch holes into cards and the machine would read commands. the cards would wind up in the hopper card file. named after her.

  • @swill1020 She is my idol! I always talk about her in class and on my blog, shadowfaxrant.blogspot.com

  • She was really ahead of her time! ;O

  • If they had the Model T in '82, what are we driving now? Ford Fairlanes?

  • Interesting and informative video......

  • Comment removed

  • Thank you so very much for posting this! I recall hearing Adm. Hopper at an ACM meeting in 1977. I *still* have my nanosecond!

  • @OryxconLara Lucky you! With dead seriousness, if I were you I'd make sure I got buried with that nanosecond when I died....either that or pass it down to a young person who will appreciated it!

  • BADASS!!!!

  • She is a goddess!

  • to the men who only think that men are knowledable with programming/computers.........­well.....take a lookie here-y.

  • @chattychar "to the men who only think that men are knowledable with programming/computers"

    Real computer nerds know that women were in the scene right from the start. For example, Lady Ada along with Charles Babbage. But it's still a male-dominated field; guys generally seem to be into things like engineering, electronics, math and so on more than women. Traditionally that may have been due to women being tied up with kids, but even today women are still the minority in these subjects.

  • @chattychar In general, men are. It's not like we'd mind if more women were interested, it's just a very unusual occurrence.

  • @lordjavathe3rd True. There aren't a lot of women in the field. what up with that?

  • how is a 6 minute video half of a 60 minute interview?

  • @FKeel1 It's from a television show entitled "60 minutes."

  • Comment removed

  • But 1 microsecond is 1000 nanoseconds, and 11.6in*1000 is 966ft. Am I missing something or is Ms. Grace Hopper wrong?

  • @xViklovex you are missing something indeed. She said 11.8 inches, not 11.6 inches. Which comes out to 980 feet (well actually 983, but there is a slight rounding error there).

  • Comment removed

  • This Woman is legit as fuck!

  • Having been in computer science now for almost 20 years, one forgets on whose shoulders one stands. Some days I feel we've only gotten to a red Model-T. There is still so much we can do, if only we had the money. Agree, love the nano second thing. So simple, but so true.

  • today 2-3 Billion calculations to the 4th power.

  • AWESOME lady, love the description of Nano-Second

  • Comment removed

  • I remember when this segment first aired. I was a teenage computer geek, and was so blown away. What a privilege to stand on the same planet with such as Rear Admiral Hopper.

  • Thanx!

  • cool

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more