@darrylsloan I've read his "Case for Christ" and was underwhelmed. He asks skeptical questions of "scholars", claims that he doubts their answers, says that he'll investigate their claims further since he couldn't rebut them, but then never does. It leaves the reader with the impression that there is no rebuttal. I suppose this works well on the uneducated, but a little research will uncover objections to all his claims.
I have McDowell's book "Evidence that Demands a Verdict." From the bits that I've read, I was not impressed with his arguments at all.
darrylsloan 5 months ago
@darrylsloan I've read his "Case for Christ" and was underwhelmed. He asks skeptical questions of "scholars", claims that he doubts their answers, says that he'll investigate their claims further since he couldn't rebut them, but then never does. It leaves the reader with the impression that there is no rebuttal. I suppose this works well on the uneducated, but a little research will uncover objections to all his claims.
PissedFechtmeister 5 months ago
@PissedFechtmeister Did McDowell also write a "Case for Christ"? I know Lee Strobel wrote a book by that name.
EruditeScythian 4 months ago
@EruditeScythian Oops, I confused McDowell with Strobel. Strobel's book is garbage. I haven't read McDowell's book.
PissedFechtmeister 4 months ago
@PissedFechtmeister I haven't read Strobel's book. I want to read that and then read "The Case Against The Case For Christ" by Robert Price
EruditeScythian 4 months ago
@darrylsloan Same here. I read ETDAV in the mid eighties and wasn't impressed at all. It's just much ado about nothing.
EruditeScythian 4 months ago