This is so dumb look, open your FUCKING eyes everyone.
i think the point is that NONE of this S H I T belongs in a state capital of the "elected" "officials" who are supposed to be separating church and state and helping our nation when in reality, are stigmatizing many races and fueling a war on "terror" supplied by (blind) patriotism and taxpayer $ and BLOOD on an undercurrent of anti-muslim (THEOCRATIC STATES!) feelings. its still the fuckin Ottoman Empire, just with USA makeing thousands
@Jordainio of miles of OIL pipelines across their homeland...what is some of their people's sacred land...
but yes lets spend trillions of dollars in the longest war in history to FIGHT for JESES and to DEFEND our nation?!?!?1 from what??! BUSH's imaginary WMDs? their mountainous poverty stricken slums?
WHAT - USA's reserve of atomic material isnt enough to kill every one on our planet 6 times over, only 4-5 times? hmmmmmmmmm
If Mr. O’Reilly would be pissing me off like that I would just shut up and look at him disappointedly, shaking my head in disapproval and wagging my finger at him. I wonder how he would react.
Also, he is right. Atheism IS NOT A RELIGION. It is a belief, a world view and whatever you want to call if but per definitionem it is NOT a religion.
Correct, it is not a religion, it is a statement opinion that debunks religion in a non factual way. Belief. Religion is the warship of a God. The warship of something higher, where as they believe we simply die and erode in the dirt.
Bill has some brief moments of humility and common sense, though they're absolutely absent in this video. Megyn is usually pretty dense... but here she is 100% right. Bill is obnoxious, condescending, and wrong!
O'Reilly's argument is that Atheism is the same as people who worship a flying spaghetti monster. It is not what he believes so everything is equally wrong in his book. He's a stubborn, narrowminded jackass and really, who cares what he thinks? He has no authority, he has no legal recourse. He is a pundit with a TV show, nothing more.
Wow, I can't believe anyone in the year of 2010 that Atheism is a religion............................you no what maybe I'm starting to become a christian as I write this, I mean sure the theory of evolution makes perfect sense but erm, we don't seem to have evolved for over 1000s of years at all :P
@Joshglenncooper We don't evolve over a thousand years, no animal evolves over a thousand years. We evolved over millions of years. The results of evolution don't just appear. You can see them, very slowly, but they aren't just right in your face. Take for example wisdom teeth, they are vestigial organs and as generations breed we are slowly losing them. There are many people without them, and it's an evolutionary advantage for them.
@OmegaLesPaul Atheism is not the belief in evolution, atheists just tend to accept evolution because they lack the intellectual and ontological blinders of a theistic mind.
@Joshglenncooper Yes we have... ? Our brains are starting to develop more? We've become less hairy? I could go on... Christianity is a lie by the way.
@Joshglenncooper are you implying that 1000 years ago man lived exactly as we do? ate the exact same things as us? communicated the same way? believe it or not, behavioral and social changes ARE a type of evolution. evolution just means change. we believe the world (and everything in it) is always changing, as opposed to Christians believing world the always the same exactly how god made it.
No, Christians believe that their is no "physical evolution" as in the fact we were originally monkeys or otherwise. However, your point is very valid that Evolution simply means change. I support that point, however, Christians don't attack change, they attack bodily Human change. They have reason to.
@MysteryPromotes so youre saying that during the age of dinosaurs, humans existed in the same physical form we do today? are you saying that when people have kids those kids are exact clones with no physical difference of any kind?
I am saying that those children are still human. Not, apes, or other formations of being. Try to understand my phonetic here. When I say evolution, I mean change, no directory of change, but change, to adapt. Evolution means changing to adapt, we as humans use our minds to adapt, not our formation. Hence heating to combat cold, forks to combat germ eating, and so forth.
Atheist's R the least violent of all people. They value life religious people on the other hand R brainwashed into thinking the "Here-after" will be better trusting the fairy tale as truth without any evidence except a poorly written book by extremely fallible men. O'Reilly does not believe in balanced news, its his point of view only that matters, typical of dogmatists. Darwin is my favorite Unitarian Universalist! Science is better than Fairy tales any day.
there could be a higher being, but I don't belife in what the bible says. do you know the childrens game "telephone"? thats for me what the bible is!! because the new testament was written between 50 and 130(!) after jesus death!! so the bible can't be the orginal word of jesus! he didn't worte it by his self! people wrote what they heard from people who knew people who lived in this period. so the 4 who wrote the gospels were no eyewitnesses!!
"[Atheism is] a religious point of view and it's been recognised as such by courts and it is treated the same as Christianity by the courts ..." What?! How can Atheism (a lack of belief in the existence of God/s) be considered a religious point of view? If this is true, it's a sneaky move to present Atheism as faith-based, which it is not.
Because it has an "ism" attached to the word? BTW, it would be a faith-based (replacing with one's belief in the religion of science) notion that there can be NO god, as compared to, say, agnosticism, which is a skeptical stance.
There's no faith involved in not accepting an assertion without evidence to support it. If you maintain that there is a sphere spinning in front of my face but I cannot sense it and no form of measurement will corroborate your claim, am I showing faith to reject it? Science is not a religion because it doesn't promote the concept of the supernatural as fact. Agnostics can behave as if the existence of a God is a 50:50 probability, but the onus is not on me to disprove every man-made fairy tale.
Not quite sure what exactly your thinking is attempting to pin down. Splitting hairs is exactly why things are addressed on their own terms. Why not go back and read what you wrote, and whittle things down a bit. Get to the essence of your argument, and eschew obfuscation!
There are many historical accounts where science, either directly, or, through its (perverse, and fallacious) applications-examples being too numerous to disclose-has bore witness to numerous horrible outcomes (okay, one example: Eugenics and Nazi Germany, and, America of the 1920s). Science in the service of political policy is not all that different than Papal Europe and the evils it perpetrated on heretics. Evil is evil.
Atheists are not religious. They have a personal depiction of a Godless universe free of karma, miracles or other such novelties.
They believe solely in themselves and mankind. Not as a religious belief but rather a personal concept that their "Is NO religion."
So I don't know where you stood on that issue, but Megyn Kelly is an idiot for considering Atheism as a religion. Latin route "Ism" just means a belief. And belief's do not have to contain religious elements.
"They believe solely in themselves and mankind": I take it this is to be understood perjoratively? I really don't see anything wrong in believing in oneself as the basis of truth seeking. As for my fellow human being, refer the the former.
I was not casting judgement on their personal belief system. Personal truth and Mankinds truth is completely merited.
I was meerely stating the fact that Ms. Kelley's claims of Atheism being a religious point of view is false.
Atheists want nothing to due with religion and as such their belief is a refusal in religious aspects. I used to be an Atheist myself and rejected any concept of religion, deity or spirituality. Her point was invalid in that regard, that was my point.
How about the decorum of the First Amendment? Why is it that religious garbage has an unquestioned privileged position in the public discourse? There is also the freedom from religion, which is implied in the First Amendment.
Bah, no evidence to the both of ya, people that bark against religion are no different then those who bark for it. When Are people going to realize that it is people that bring about discorse not religion.
brainwashing is a whole new story if you want to bring that, which brainwashing can go both ways with believers and not believers
First of all JohnR, the separation of church and state is the result of a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. This letter was about how the state should have no controll over a persons system of beliefs. Christianity is the reason America exists today. Can anyone say Protestentism. Read a book. By the way, Christmas not x-mass.
Yeah I mean, when are people going to learn to not provoke religion and beliefs. I mean its a fire that can only be stirred higher you have to leave that shit alone you can't bash it. Athiest and other creationalist have to shut the fuck up seriously, there makin shit worse for themselves D:
There are other ways to bridging connections rather then diminishing another's believe system.
"There are other ways to bridging connections rather then diminishing another's believe system" : I try not to make it personal, however, I feel compelled-and justified-in critiquing stultifying notions and dogmas: religion being a prime example.
Hmm, don't you think stultifying is like stepping on to many people's necks while their asleep? There is something idiotic about trying to argue with faith, thats like trying to understand how you can feel justified on this.
I just think the methods of non-believers and believers are wrong, its like they got score cards or someting. Non-believers need to swallow their pride on feeling smart on cracking logic, and believers need to calm the hell down.
Is English your second language? The dichotomy you draw between believers and non, might be appropriate for specific arguments. However, in the real world, being a "non-believer" is not just a matter of arrogance and having an aire of superiority. I strongly feel that anyone can believe what they want, but when that belief spills into the public arena, and starts to inform political decisions for ALL of us, then someone needs to speak up. That, by the way, is what one calls democracy in action.
Umm yeah What you said didn't apply to me at all because I'm not at odds with it lololol
I'm sorry that "non-believer" got to you. I didn't mean it in arrogance or slander, just to make it adjacent to the term "Believer" My bad and I'll definitly work on it, I just hope you got what I meant and such.
Democracy is indeed in action, its been that way since day one and everyone has been a part of it including me and you, lets just hope it doesn't do too much damage and humility takes its place.
A core belief of this country is separation of Church & State. NOBODY, including christian fundamentalists, disagrees with this.
For 200 years this country had harmless little nods to religion (in god we trust, xmas displays, etc.). And guess what? Everything was fine! We didn't turn into ancient Rome or fundamentalist Iran!!
But...Leftists have declared war on ALL religion...for political purposes. The hate coming from the Left will tear this country apart, which is exactly what they want
Again again christians show that they dont respect other believer of non-believer. I believe in that old dusty book of yours something stands like: You should treat people the way you wished to be treat. We are alle equal but christians just a little bit more, right?
jerk: How typical of Leftist ideologues like you to jump to conclusions. Here's a news flash...I'm not religious. Get it? Got it?
But...I do believe the average person is a better and more decent citizen if he has modest religious faith. The problem comes when demagogues try to push religion into the political sphere.
Modest refs to religion as mentioned in my original post are part of our fucking culture and hurt NO ONE. The Left has decclared war on ALL religion. Who is intolerant now?
Bill, just because you are a die hard christian does not mean that gives you the right to claim to your viewers that someone else's religions are wrong. Who the h*ll are you to say atheism is not a religion? It's a belief system, so in my book... it's a religion. AS for the poll you showed... of course it's going to show up like that! Most of your viewers are obviously uninformed just like you. There was nothing wrong with that sign. That is exactly what atheists believe
I never had respect for Bill and this is reason behind it.
iPhTx3 2 months ago
Comment removed
iPhTx3 2 months ago
M Kelly is right about atheism being de jure a religion.
911jbg 3 months ago
This is so dumb look, open your FUCKING eyes everyone.
i think the point is that NONE of this S H I T belongs in a state capital of the "elected" "officials" who are supposed to be separating church and state and helping our nation when in reality, are stigmatizing many races and fueling a war on "terror" supplied by (blind) patriotism and taxpayer $ and BLOOD on an undercurrent of anti-muslim (THEOCRATIC STATES!) feelings. its still the fuckin Ottoman Empire, just with USA makeing thousands
Jordainio 7 months ago
@Jordainio of miles of OIL pipelines across their homeland...what is some of their people's sacred land...
but yes lets spend trillions of dollars in the longest war in history to FIGHT for JESES and to DEFEND our nation?!?!?1 from what??! BUSH's imaginary WMDs? their mountainous poverty stricken slums?
WHAT - USA's reserve of atomic material isnt enough to kill every one on our planet 6 times over, only 4-5 times? hmmmmmmmmm
Jordainio 7 months ago
all hail his noodlliness
gan0nsl4y3r 9 months ago
5:25!!!! LMAO!!! LOVE THE FACE!!! ;)
rickfan1964 10 months ago
BILL YOU FAIL HERE ..AGAIN....MAN...GET EDUCATED BILL....DO YOU STILL HAVE A SHOW?
bakersfieldmusicnow 11 months ago
If Mr. O’Reilly would be pissing me off like that I would just shut up and look at him disappointedly, shaking my head in disapproval and wagging my finger at him. I wonder how he would react.
Also, he is right. Atheism IS NOT A RELIGION. It is a belief, a world view and whatever you want to call if but per definitionem it is NOT a religion.
MoaiMaea 1 year ago
@MoaiMaea
Correct, it is not a religion, it is a statement opinion that debunks religion in a non factual way. Belief. Religion is the warship of a God. The warship of something higher, where as they believe we simply die and erode in the dirt.
MysteryPromotes 10 months ago
Bill has some brief moments of humility and common sense, though they're absolutely absent in this video. Megyn is usually pretty dense... but here she is 100% right. Bill is obnoxious, condescending, and wrong!
Nab314 1 year ago 8
O'Reilly's argument is that Atheism is the same as people who worship a flying spaghetti monster. It is not what he believes so everything is equally wrong in his book. He's a stubborn, narrowminded jackass and really, who cares what he thinks? He has no authority, he has no legal recourse. He is a pundit with a TV show, nothing more.
slimtechn 1 year ago
Huh? It IS the same. How is not equal?
MoaiMaea 1 year ago
@MoaiMaea If its equal than that means Atheism is equal to Christianity as well. People are free to believe whatever they like.
slimtechn 1 year ago
Isn’t it?
MoaiMaea 1 year ago
As much as I dislike 99% of Bill's viewpoints... he's right that Atheism is not a religion.
MLorio777 1 year ago
freedom is a bitch isnt is?
pandola214 1 year ago
fuck bill oreilly, and that bitch too!!!
Ddstairclimber 1 year ago
Fuck bill oreilly
Ddstairclimber 1 year ago
Wow, I can't believe anyone in the year of 2010 that Atheism is a religion............................you no what maybe I'm starting to become a christian as I write this, I mean sure the theory of evolution makes perfect sense but erm, we don't seem to have evolved for over 1000s of years at all :P
Joshglenncooper 1 year ago
@Joshglenncooper We don't evolve over a thousand years, no animal evolves over a thousand years. We evolved over millions of years. The results of evolution don't just appear. You can see them, very slowly, but they aren't just right in your face. Take for example wisdom teeth, they are vestigial organs and as generations breed we are slowly losing them. There are many people without them, and it's an evolutionary advantage for them.
Atheism IS religion. It's a belief in evolution.
OmegaLesPaul 1 year ago
@OmegaLesPaul Atheism is not the belief in evolution, atheists just tend to accept evolution because they lack the intellectual and ontological blinders of a theistic mind.
axzsszxa 1 year ago
@axzsszxa of course, believing in a man on a cloud with a beard that judges us all takes far greater intelligence. idiot.
MrMichaelj1982 1 year ago
@MrMichaelj1982 You misunderstood my post...dramatically...
axzsszxa 1 year ago
@Joshglenncooper Yes we have... ? Our brains are starting to develop more? We've become less hairy? I could go on... Christianity is a lie by the way.
DrinkSkateSleep 1 year ago
@Joshglenncooper are you implying that 1000 years ago man lived exactly as we do? ate the exact same things as us? communicated the same way? believe it or not, behavioral and social changes ARE a type of evolution. evolution just means change. we believe the world (and everything in it) is always changing, as opposed to Christians believing world the always the same exactly how god made it.
sleeve318 1 year ago
@sleeve318
No, Christians believe that their is no "physical evolution" as in the fact we were originally monkeys or otherwise. However, your point is very valid that Evolution simply means change. I support that point, however, Christians don't attack change, they attack bodily Human change. They have reason to.
MysteryPromotes 10 months ago
@MysteryPromotes so youre saying that during the age of dinosaurs, humans existed in the same physical form we do today? are you saying that when people have kids those kids are exact clones with no physical difference of any kind?
sleeve318 9 months ago
@sleeve318
I am saying that those children are still human. Not, apes, or other formations of being. Try to understand my phonetic here. When I say evolution, I mean change, no directory of change, but change, to adapt. Evolution means changing to adapt, we as humans use our minds to adapt, not our formation. Hence heating to combat cold, forks to combat germ eating, and so forth.
MysteryPromotes 9 months ago
@MysteryPromotes hitler believed he wasnt a descendant of a jew. it doesnt mean its true...
sleeve318 9 months ago
You will not find an athiest boarding a plane with a bomb waving a copy of "On Origin of Species". We are logical people.
hellfire8449 1 year ago 2
Atheist's R the least violent of all people. They value life religious people on the other hand R brainwashed into thinking the "Here-after" will be better trusting the fairy tale as truth without any evidence except a poorly written book by extremely fallible men. O'Reilly does not believe in balanced news, its his point of view only that matters, typical of dogmatists. Darwin is my favorite Unitarian Universalist! Science is better than Fairy tales any day.
tomestubbs 1 year ago
what court case said atheism was a religion?
Brewhahh 2 years ago
According to Bill he's never wrong.
I find that very funny. It really make me LOL.
mookiecc10 2 years ago
I hate to say it, but Bill really isn't a bad guy. I might actually enjoy a joint...oh, never mind, he's a prat!
whiff1962 2 years ago
there could be a higher being, but I don't belife in what the bible says. do you know the childrens game "telephone"? thats for me what the bible is!! because the new testament was written between 50 and 130(!) after jesus death!! so the bible can't be the orginal word of jesus! he didn't worte it by his self! people wrote what they heard from people who knew people who lived in this period. so the 4 who wrote the gospels were no eyewitnesses!!
residancing 2 years ago
"[Atheism is] a religious point of view and it's been recognised as such by courts and it is treated the same as Christianity by the courts ..." What?! How can Atheism (a lack of belief in the existence of God/s) be considered a religious point of view? If this is true, it's a sneaky move to present Atheism as faith-based, which it is not.
Valelacerte 2 years ago
Because it has an "ism" attached to the word? BTW, it would be a faith-based (replacing with one's belief in the religion of science) notion that there can be NO god, as compared to, say, agnosticism, which is a skeptical stance.
whiff1962 2 years ago
There's no faith involved in not accepting an assertion without evidence to support it. If you maintain that there is a sphere spinning in front of my face but I cannot sense it and no form of measurement will corroborate your claim, am I showing faith to reject it? Science is not a religion because it doesn't promote the concept of the supernatural as fact. Agnostics can behave as if the existence of a God is a 50:50 probability, but the onus is not on me to disprove every man-made fairy tale.
Valelacerte 2 years ago
Not quite sure what exactly your thinking is attempting to pin down. Splitting hairs is exactly why things are addressed on their own terms. Why not go back and read what you wrote, and whittle things down a bit. Get to the essence of your argument, and eschew obfuscation!
whiff1962 2 years ago
There are many historical accounts where science, either directly, or, through its (perverse, and fallacious) applications-examples being too numerous to disclose-has bore witness to numerous horrible outcomes (okay, one example: Eugenics and Nazi Germany, and, America of the 1920s). Science in the service of political policy is not all that different than Papal Europe and the evils it perpetrated on heretics. Evil is evil.
whiff1962 2 years ago
Born witness.
whiff1962 2 years ago
It always amuses me to see people bashing science... on a computer..... over the internet.
Jesus sure did a good job creating these things for us to use.
napalmfuzz 2 years ago
I thought Al Gore invented the internet, and not Jesus.
whiff1962 2 years ago
Atheists are not religious. They have a personal depiction of a Godless universe free of karma, miracles or other such novelties.
They believe solely in themselves and mankind. Not as a religious belief but rather a personal concept that their "Is NO religion."
So I don't know where you stood on that issue, but Megyn Kelly is an idiot for considering Atheism as a religion. Latin route "Ism" just means a belief. And belief's do not have to contain religious elements.
Shroomalator 2 years ago
"They believe solely in themselves and mankind": I take it this is to be understood perjoratively? I really don't see anything wrong in believing in oneself as the basis of truth seeking. As for my fellow human being, refer the the former.
whiff1962 2 years ago
I was not casting judgement on their personal belief system. Personal truth and Mankinds truth is completely merited.
I was meerely stating the fact that Ms. Kelley's claims of Atheism being a religious point of view is false.
Atheists want nothing to due with religion and as such their belief is a refusal in religious aspects. I used to be an Atheist myself and rejected any concept of religion, deity or spirituality. Her point was invalid in that regard, that was my point.
Shroomalator 2 years ago
Used to be an "atheist"? What happened? Did you go to prison and have a conversion experience in the showers?
whiff1962 2 years ago 3
@Shroomalator You obviously misunderstood Megan Kelly. She said THE COURTS have declared Atheism a Religion.
brooksramsey1 1 year ago
Go hang yourself Billy.
CCCCCalico 2 years ago
they're both wrong imo, but bill was closer to being right
joewhitcomb1213 2 years ago
How about the decorum of the First Amendment? Why is it that religious garbage has an unquestioned privileged position in the public discourse? There is also the freedom from religion, which is implied in the First Amendment.
whiff1962 2 years ago
Religion is a way for inferior people to feel superior.
70road 3 years ago
In part true. But it is also is a way for the powerful to subjugate the weaker.
whiff1962 2 years ago
Bah, no evidence to the both of ya, people that bark against religion are no different then those who bark for it. When Are people going to realize that it is people that bring about discorse not religion.
brainwashing is a whole new story if you want to bring that, which brainwashing can go both ways with believers and not believers
guiltyblade 2 years ago
Megyn Kelly u got my back, Bill O'reilly is a moron
shersondf 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
First of all JohnR, the separation of church and state is the result of a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. This letter was about how the state should have no controll over a persons system of beliefs. Christianity is the reason America exists today. Can anyone say Protestentism. Read a book. By the way, Christmas not x-mass.
organicboy 3 years ago
too bad jesus personally taught to separate church and state but ppl do it anyways
69aznboi 3 years ago
Yeah I mean, when are people going to learn to not provoke religion and beliefs. I mean its a fire that can only be stirred higher you have to leave that shit alone you can't bash it. Athiest and other creationalist have to shut the fuck up seriously, there makin shit worse for themselves D:
There are other ways to bridging connections rather then diminishing another's believe system.
guiltyblade 2 years ago
"There are other ways to bridging connections rather then diminishing another's believe system" : I try not to make it personal, however, I feel compelled-and justified-in critiquing stultifying notions and dogmas: religion being a prime example.
whiff1962 2 years ago
You feel compelled and justified? D:
Hmm, don't you think stultifying is like stepping on to many people's necks while their asleep? There is something idiotic about trying to argue with faith, thats like trying to understand how you can feel justified on this.
I just think the methods of non-believers and believers are wrong, its like they got score cards or someting. Non-believers need to swallow their pride on feeling smart on cracking logic, and believers need to calm the hell down.
guiltyblade 2 years ago
Is English your second language? The dichotomy you draw between believers and non, might be appropriate for specific arguments. However, in the real world, being a "non-believer" is not just a matter of arrogance and having an aire of superiority. I strongly feel that anyone can believe what they want, but when that belief spills into the public arena, and starts to inform political decisions for ALL of us, then someone needs to speak up. That, by the way, is what one calls democracy in action.
whiff1962 2 years ago
Umm yeah What you said didn't apply to me at all because I'm not at odds with it lololol
I'm sorry that "non-believer" got to you. I didn't mean it in arrogance or slander, just to make it adjacent to the term "Believer" My bad and I'll definitly work on it, I just hope you got what I meant and such.
Democracy is indeed in action, its been that way since day one and everyone has been a part of it including me and you, lets just hope it doesn't do too much damage and humility takes its place.
guiltyblade 2 years ago
A core belief of this country is separation of Church & State. NOBODY, including christian fundamentalists, disagrees with this.
For 200 years this country had harmless little nods to religion (in god we trust, xmas displays, etc.). And guess what? Everything was fine! We didn't turn into ancient Rome or fundamentalist Iran!!
But...Leftists have declared war on ALL religion...for political purposes. The hate coming from the Left will tear this country apart, which is exactly what they want
JohnR22926 3 years ago
Again again christians show that they dont respect other believer of non-believer. I believe in that old dusty book of yours something stands like: You should treat people the way you wished to be treat. We are alle equal but christians just a little bit more, right?
jrk524 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
jerk: How typical of Leftist ideologues like you to jump to conclusions. Here's a news flash...I'm not religious. Get it? Got it?
But...I do believe the average person is a better and more decent citizen if he has modest religious faith. The problem comes when demagogues try to push religion into the political sphere.
Modest refs to religion as mentioned in my original post are part of our fucking culture and hurt NO ONE. The Left has decclared war on ALL religion. Who is intolerant now?
JohnR22926 3 years ago
bill can suck my dick
misterbowser 3 years ago 12
@misterbowser I wouldn't let him near me.
resonantdave 1 year ago
Finally some truth is told on this sad excuse for a "fair and balanced" show. Nice one Kelly !
zeitgeisthero 3 years ago
Bill never shuts up to listen.
CRW 3 years ago
Bill, just because you are a die hard christian does not mean that gives you the right to claim to your viewers that someone else's religions are wrong. Who the h*ll are you to say atheism is not a religion? It's a belief system, so in my book... it's a religion. AS for the poll you showed... of course it's going to show up like that! Most of your viewers are obviously uninformed just like you. There was nothing wrong with that sign. That is exactly what atheists believe
AdultsSwim1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Atheism is a Relgious Point of View - that's exaktly how I see it
wildhias 3 years ago