Added: 2 years ago
From: 17benarctic95
Views: 71,833
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (271)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOVELoveLOve this version too <3 xxxx

  • wow! what a great raw punk version of Nick Cave's masterpiece

  • This is fantastic!!!

  • I do prefer this to the original if I'm honest

  • Whooooooaaa! The original is a poor cousin!

    

  • 66666 wiew

  • This song is pure awesomeness, punto e basta !

  • Is the image suppose to be a dick, or am i the only who sees that?

  • @mahavishnuxc Thanks for that astute display of Freudian behaviorism.

  • @Wonksitoxic Sigmund Freud never really dabbled in that and Behaviorist psychology has nothing to do with this.

  • @mahavishnuxc lmao.............

  • both versions are good. if i could i'd cover all my favorite songs but then again u people would prob just say that my verion sucked and the original was better. but do u know how many tunes and melodies artist now adays and even back as early as the 40's stole from pre-existing artists. so telling people that the orginal is better just makes YOU seem like the stupid one here. thats all i have to say of this matter.

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 you dont have a fuckin clue you fuckin idiot!!!

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 did you seriously just say that nick cave is a nobody.

  • @keesvdijkhuizen Yes, I did; if you want evidence of this, you need only to read my previous comment - you dumb sperm cell.

  • @keesvdijkhuizen Im here cuz of u : ) Thanks

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Dude seriously if you're going to be an asshole can you go away?

  • @TheoMackenzi fuck off u ckunt

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Do you know any more insults? Cunt's getting a little repetitive

  • @TheoMackpacki sorry, your a fucking asshole shithead dickhead tithead prick bitch ass bastard son of a bitch dirty smelly muslim cocksucker

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 *You're

  • @TheoMackenzi Sorry my English isn't up to standard - didn't realize this was a test!

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 It's not

  • @TheoMackenzi Alright then, well you can stop correcting everything I spell incorrectly, no one likes a smart ass, especially a smart ass like you - adopted beat-by-his-dad piece of shit on someones shoe.

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Nobody likes an ignorant racist prick either

  • @TheoMackenzi Hahaha don't cry you little nigger

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 This is done it's boring and I didn't come here to argue

  • @TheoMackenzi k cyabyecunt

  • @CALLOFDUTYisBAD01

    dont be a racist fuck, it's 2011 mate mature up like the rest of us

    - written by a white guy.

  • Nick Cave did it better.

  • the original SHITS on this version!

  • Personally, I love this version. I don't compare it to Cave's because it's not him doing it, and making an exact replica of the original kinda defeats the object of a cover, doesn't it? Arctic Monkeys have made it sound like their material, and maybe that means it isn't as powerfully atmospheric as the original, but that's the point of a cover; to put your own spin on a song. So stop whining. If you wanna listen to the original, go do that. If you like this one, that's all good too.

  • Comment removed

  • This is a one night stand.

    Nick Cave is a long walk one the beach.

    Followed by murder.

  • Why are people complaining that it's not exactly the same of the original? That would be pointless if it was. People on youtube will complain and argue about anything.

  • This is a good cover- it's a nice contrast to the the slower (but still good) original. Anyway, if so many people here don't like it, then why watch it? If you try it and don't like it, there's this amazing thing called a 'back' button in the upper left hand corner of the page that lets you return to the previous one- you can go back without posting snide remarks that everyone is tired of hearing.

  • People don't hate on them because of who they are or because of their work in general. People are hating on this video because the Arctic Monkeys have removed basically all the emotion that the original one carried.

    Anyone who doesn't understand, try listening to both versions while walking down a dark alley. See which one affects you.

  • just because the monkeys decide to give the song give an upbeat tempo to a slow song doesn't mean there shit. If it does, that means Zeppelin is shit sonce they took old time blues and put a little edge to it. Both versions are awesome

  • This is better than any song that actually made the Humbug album IMO.

  • As soon as they do a cover of Nick Cave there labelled as shit, which there not

  • Arctic Monkeys's awesome and Nick Cave's awesome so I cannot see what's the fucking problem with this cover!? Is just two awesomeness combined.

  • So much hate.

    Fucking trolls.

  • if you dont like something that does not necessary mean you are a troll....

  • I don't know of any cover that tries to be better than its original. That's the way to do a cover, is to make it your own thing.

    That's why I can appreciate this.

  • Sounds good and all, but I don't like it. The essence of the song is missing.

  • @TheLeonBM I agree. It's really just... nothing in it. I guess it sounds fun if you're in the audience at a concert, but... isn't really worth the listen.

  • fuck.....this is terrible

  • maybe if this was covered by a better band it would sound good hard and fast but this is shit, this band is shit, it wasnt fluid, it was all fucked out all over the place

  • @cobboGHS91 So who are some bands that you consider to be not "shit"?

  • this fuckin blows...nick cave is the best.

  • Or is it that people just feel particularly hip for liking Nike Cave when he is not commercially known by the bubblegum masses and thus get overly protective of it? I mean how dare anyone else be inspired by NC&TBS and cover that song YOU really like ..right? lol.

  • @kmizfit36 or maybe they just prefer the original?

  • @Fivebyfive1234 Perhaps. But that begs the question of why they are on this page grumbling instead of going to the original videos page and gushing. Seems like a waste of energy to me but whatever floats your boat man. So what are your thoughts on the Metallica cover o f" Loverman"? Did you leave them a "prefer the original" love note too? lol

  • @kmizfit36 They're on this page because they saw a cover of a song they liked and they were interested. If they're being little bitches about it then they need to shut up but a few people have simply stated they prefer the original to this one which is fair enough. Do you look for people who say they like one song over the other and try to patronise them?

  • @ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.

  • @ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.

  • Do people really believe when Bands do covers they are trying to TOP the original? Most times it's a mark of respect for inspiration. Doing something different to a favorite song should be on the to do list of any band... I'd also say instead of bitching about a version you don't happen to like much..try doing it better yourself. Don't tell someone what their inspirations can and cannot be and what songs they can and cannot cover though...

  • The original is a million times better than this. It shouldn't be upbeat like this.

  • This song puts me in the mood :D

  • I love the Arctic monkey's orginals, but I don't think this does any justice to the Nick Cave version. But it was a good attempt. No one can top Nick Cave.

  • Comment removed

  • This version transports exactly the feeling that nick cave had when he wrote this, BUT much groovier and kickassing

  • I hate that with every cover of a cultish song that you get the die hard fans of the original who just come on to bitch about it, and you know their mind was already made up about before they even heard the new version making ridiculously ott statements such as "this is terrible, they've destroyed this song" blah blah blah. Do us all a favour and FUCK OFF!

  • @scootaymildo definitely, i mean i prefer this to the original but that doesn't mean i don't like the original, it's like that with s many songs!

  • @dwswh2 The thing is I actually prefer the original but that isn't to say the arctic monkeys haven't made a good version themselves.

  • @scootaymildo yh i get you people just think if you like one better than the other then you must think the others rubbish when it's just ur opinion of what you prefer.

  • @scootaymildo

    No. Not everyone is like that. I love the original, but I don't like this one simply because it just isn't that good imo. Doesn't mean I'm wrong or right. Doesn't mean you are wrong or right. You are wrong for grouping everybody who hates this song together. That's just ignorant. And ignorant people like you still won't understand the logic I just told you, so maybe its you that needs to fuck off!

    And that is how you OWN an ignorant, internet douchebad:)

  • @buddygroove I didn't say everyone who dislikes this version was like that, I just said there are lots of people who are, which i'm sure you know is true. I don't mind people not liking the cover, but I have an issue with people who don't listen to music with an open mind and then bitch about the cover version because they have some weird unshakable devotion to the original. You're forgiven for your mistake but that douchebad comment really burned :-)

  • @scootaymildo

    Yeah, I got a little carried away with the last sentence. I don't even like using the words, "own" or "owned". I was trying to be one of those internet douche trolls cuz I thought you were one. ha Its all good:)

  • As an Arctic Monkeys fan, I think that everything they release is pure genius. Still, this version is not nearly as good as the Nick Cave version.

    =)

  • this makes me want to go round alex turner's house and punch him in his overhyped face, then do to him what he's done to this song

  • 0.26 vocal auto tune makes an appearance... this has destroyed the original, its lost its charm and its fun, artic monkeys have turned it into another dull repetitive boring song.Nick Cave would be spinning in his grave... but he's not dead.

  • This is a good cover, it takes the quietly sinister feel of the original and puts an ubiquitous menace at the forefront.

    I /prefer/ the original but this is great.

  • Well I'd really like to make a cover of my favorite songs too but then I come to think of what people would say. E.g. "the original is better" "this is terrible" "you ruined the song" etc. That just sucks you know. Let them do the cover.

    And btw. I prefer this version.

  • @underwatermelons I'm sorry, I didn't know we couldn't voice our opinions here. The original is better and this is terrible. They ruined this song! And that's just my opinion. So... just forget about it.

  • i LOVE it!

  • lame

  • HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! D:

  • HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! D:!!!!!!!!

  • i love artic monkeys ad i like this version but the original is the shizzz

  • it's a cover, not a copy. i prefer their version because it's more lively, but that's just me.

  • I prefer this version.

  • The way some of you are going on about Nick Cave you'd think nobody was allowed to have their own interpretation on his music. Isn't that what art is? Interpretations? I enjoy this track, haven't even listened to the Nick Cave version yet. That says it all doesn't it?

  • It's a cover. Why wouldn't they put their own spin on it? I think it sounds awesome if you pull you head out of your pretentious asses and enjoyed it for what it is instead of trying to compare it to the original. We know Nick Cave is the man, you don't need to say it.

  • TERRIBLE

  • wrecked the song guys. The best part about it was how the slow music matched the lyrics. HORRIBLE

  • You are aware of what a cover is aren't you everybody? Just saying.

  • where the fucks the slow menace of the original? fucking shite.

  • @rabidbanshee cunt

  • Why can't they just leave some songs?

  • hmm, i somehow find the AM version slightly better than Nick Caves' one

  • helder is perfect on this track....suit him well.

  • Not as good as the original, but still pretty good.

  • arctics do the best covers, listen to it for what it is, mint. fuck off back to the stone age haters ;(

  • omg. this is so lame

  • Awful cover. This is so far from the mark it can't even pass as a joke.

  • yawn

  • i just really appreciate that bands such as arctic monkeys are covering this kind of musc instead of mainstream bullshit

  • The original sounds a lot different! They have kinda have changed the genre! Still KICKASS though!

  • Well, the bass-line is pretty fuckin' Louisiana cool. Sorta cleaned-up Birthday Party-style riff. Could've used some real screaming by Alex, though.

  • i like the arctic monkeys but this is terrible nick cave version is better

  • Not bad,,,,not good but not bad either.Like aston villa

  • Not a bad cover. Obviously most originals are better. If you want to hear a shithouse cover by Nick Cave, check out his version of Johnny Cash's "Wanted Man" . Its like peeling your ears off with a cheese grater.

  • @jacktar207 You obviously haven't heard Nick play this live in the 2000s :D

    Cum-in-your-pants hell-hound stuff.

  • I think that both this and the original are great. It's like Nick Cave explored the more mysterious and dark side of the song, while the Arctic Monkeys made it more frantic and urgent.

  • I listened to this song because there was an argument on a nick cave video about this being better than the NC version... It's not.

  • original is much better!

  • i heard this version before i heard the nick cave version. i like this one much more... i mean really, the original just seems so boring and slow and drawn out. as a drummer, though, this song probably appeals to me more partly because of the fun drums. the other version hardly has anything going on besides the singing

  • no this seriously sucks ass

    a really shitty cover

    the are just embarrassing the great CAVE.

  • fantastic cover!

  • Heard somewhere that this will be featured in Scream 4... any truth behind that? I suppose it makes sense, the original was in the first three.

  • If People Dont Like This Version Then Id Like To See Them Do Better Yes Nick Cave Is Better But This Is A Good Cover They Made It To Fit There Own Style So If Your Going To Diss You Poast Me A Vid Of Your Cover For Us All To Fucking Troll At :)

  • ....how does THIS have nearly 5 times as many views as the original?

  • sounds interesting, but NICK CAVE ist the BEST!!!

  • both versions are brilliant.

  • Nick Cave is the book. Arctic Monkeys is the damn movie.

  • @adboot That covers just about everything. Right as rain. (:

  • @adboot So it's dumbed down with only half the atmosphere?

  • @adboot Agreed.

  • @adboot LMAO this shit fucking sucks. How can u compare this to the real version.

  • @adboot they're just having fun, leave them alone

  • Nick Cave can sing instead of the wimpy english vocals, sounds like a kindergarden version.

  • Of course this isn't sung or played as dark as Nick Cave thats the way he runs things, Arctic Monkeys don't. This is a fantastic cover and you need to recognize the brilliance of both bands here.

  • Comment removed

  • I love Nick Cave and Arctic Monkeys and I have to say they have definately made it their own but for me it lacks all the atmosphere and mood that made me love the original version.

  • This doesn't have shit on the original.

  • they did what you need to do with a cover MAKE IT YOUR OWN so shut up and just listen to the song

  • BOOBIESSSS!!!!!

  • i like both versions but if you dont like this one kindly fuck off. no one is trying to shove it down your throat.

  • @smiddykid touchy aye chuck!!

  • Butthurt Nick Cave fags. Arctics clearly arn't shit. If you don't like the cover, don't listen to it. Simple. I think you're just secretly gutted because this is the better version.

  • Not good

  • not a great cover

  • Holy Shit......these guys suck.

  • meh don't like this version at all. yuck

  • It's a so and so vibe...I mean, I love their music and everything that they've recorded, but this cover isn't #1. I think it's a good cover, but its not the best one they've done

  • They should stick to their own songs.This is just a bad attempt.

  • They totally missed the vibe of that excellent song.

  • original was sung alot better by nick cave :( bad attempt

  • Great cover!

  • at least the Arctic Monkeys know who Nick Cave is... that's one thing. Kind of like eating hands.

  • I actually like a few Arctic Monkey songs but this just isn't for me. I found the original had an overall creepiness to it whereas this seems to just sound like a clunky fast paced hard rock tune.

  • What a crap.Only Nick Cave should be allowed to perform this!

  • The fuck is this? It has to be the worst cover of any song I've ever heard. And from such a shitty band too... Talentless imbeciles.

    Illiterate Arctic Monkeys fanboy responses in 5... 4... 3... 2...

  • @srj6w4u 1, your a dick, fuck off.

  • @srj6w4u 1 your a dick fuck off.

  • eh. mediocre.  Original is better.

  • Insulting

  • rofl what the crap, way to ruin a great song, fuckin talentless assclowns

  • This Version is horrable

  • wow i don't get it why people say it's better than original, it's totally diffrent ;o hard to relate both of them

  • Where would i be likely to find Arctic Monkeys EP's sold in CD form.

    (I just realised i talked quite fancy in that comment :P)

  • I love Nick Cave and Arctics. Both versions are really different which is great. The whole point in covering a song is to make it your own and they've definitely done that.

  • Haha I seriously think this song is about the Devil. Me and my friend were actually listening to the lyrics, and it seems like the Devil..

  • this song i would rather have on the humbug album as opposed to secret door

  • @Isle0fRed huh?

    Secret door is full of win.

  • @Rumil20 quoting Remus Lupin," what?"

  • wtf is this shit

  • I don't Care about Anything..!! I Love Arctic Monkeys!!

  • vayanse todos a la goma par de inches ignorantes,si nos les gusta los A.M LLEGUENLEE!! ¬¬

  • cool, but I prefer the original

  • I would say that this is a more easy version to embrace. It's great, but so is Nick Cave and the Bad Seed's too.

  • First of all... how is this version happy?

    second, i respect nick cave for making this awesome song, but compared to this remake, its a little... dead... this version gives it a more kick ass feeling... the guitar, has a sort of screaming agony, giving it an edge of despair... its pretty well thought out, i give nick cave kudos for the making, but i think alex overwhelmed on the deliverance.

  • Not a patch on Cave's version.

  • Awesome cave, better than the nick cave´s original song.

  • I'm no Arctic Monkeys fan, but then I can appreciate anybody who has the good sense to dig Mr. Cave. Not very close to the Red Right Hand I know and love, but hey, these guys did their best! *pats on the head*

  • I'm surrounded by idiots

  • WHAT is this??? TERRIBLE!

  • This is one of my favorite tracks from this album, it's an awesome cover, they make it their own.

  • It's not too bad a cover, but honestly, it doesn't really have the right sort of vibe I've associated with the Man With the Red Right Hand. It sounds too.. Happy. The MWtRRH is described as a dark figure, walking through the shadows and the hidden highways of the world. This sounds more like a beach tune than anything else.

  • NICK's Version is wayyy better! How's this better at all? The mystery and, excuse me, darkness, is all gone, and now it's just some alternative tune. How...?

  • @StevieWonder501 you say "alternative" but alternative to what? bands like arctic monkeys rule the charts...nothing alternative about that.

  • @alexthemod1 You didn't get my point...this VERSION IS NOT GOOD! in my opinion..................zsdgj

  • Dig the album cover though..

  • this version doesn't seem to gel together well, sumthing doesnt seem right, mybe the lyric theme doesn't fit indy post punk

  • If you listen to this song and can't help but complain how this is nothing like the original, then you should crawl back underneath your covers reading The Lords and The New Creatures. Nick Cave was always a cheap Morrison knock off.