both versions are good. if i could i'd cover all my favorite songs but then again u people would prob just say that my verion sucked and the original was better. but do u know how many tunes and melodies artist now adays and even back as early as the 40's stole from pre-existing artists. so telling people that the orginal is better just makes YOU seem like the stupid one here. thats all i have to say of this matter.
@TheoMackenzi Alright then, well you can stop correcting everything I spell incorrectly, no one likes a smart ass, especially a smart ass like you - adopted beat-by-his-dad piece of shit on someones shoe.
Personally, I love this version. I don't compare it to Cave's because it's not him doing it, and making an exact replica of the original kinda defeats the object of a cover, doesn't it? Arctic Monkeys have made it sound like their material, and maybe that means it isn't as powerfully atmospheric as the original, but that's the point of a cover; to put your own spin on a song. So stop whining. If you wanna listen to the original, go do that. If you like this one, that's all good too.
Why are people complaining that it's not exactly the same of the original? That would be pointless if it was. People on youtube will complain and argue about anything.
This is a good cover- it's a nice contrast to the the slower (but still good) original. Anyway, if so many people here don't like it, then why watch it? If you try it and don't like it, there's this amazing thing called a 'back' button in the upper left hand corner of the page that lets you return to the previous one- you can go back without posting snide remarks that everyone is tired of hearing.
People don't hate on them because of who they are or because of their work in general. People are hating on this video because the Arctic Monkeys have removed basically all the emotion that the original one carried.
Anyone who doesn't understand, try listening to both versions while walking down a dark alley. See which one affects you.
just because the monkeys decide to give the song give an upbeat tempo to a slow song doesn't mean there shit. If it does, that means Zeppelin is shit sonce they took old time blues and put a little edge to it. Both versions are awesome
@TheLeonBM I agree. It's really just... nothing in it. I guess it sounds fun if you're in the audience at a concert, but... isn't really worth the listen.
maybe if this was covered by a better band it would sound good hard and fast but this is shit, this band is shit, it wasnt fluid, it was all fucked out all over the place
Or is it that people just feel particularly hip for liking Nike Cave when he is not commercially known by the bubblegum masses and thus get overly protective of it? I mean how dare anyone else be inspired by NC&TBS and cover that song YOU really like ..right? lol.
@Fivebyfive1234 Perhaps. But that begs the question of why they are on this page grumbling instead of going to the original videos page and gushing. Seems like a waste of energy to me but whatever floats your boat man. So what are your thoughts on the Metallica cover o f" Loverman"? Did you leave them a "prefer the original" love note too? lol
@kmizfit36 They're on this page because they saw a cover of a song they liked and they were interested. If they're being little bitches about it then they need to shut up but a few people have simply stated they prefer the original to this one which is fair enough. Do you look for people who say they like one song over the other and try to patronise them?
@ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.
@ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.
Do people really believe when Bands do covers they are trying to TOP the original? Most times it's a mark of respect for inspiration. Doing something different to a favorite song should be on the to do list of any band... I'd also say instead of bitching about a version you don't happen to like much..try doing it better yourself. Don't tell someone what their inspirations can and cannot be and what songs they can and cannot cover though...
I love the Arctic monkey's orginals, but I don't think this does any justice to the Nick Cave version. But it was a good attempt. No one can top Nick Cave.
I hate that with every cover of a cultish song that you get the die hard fans of the original who just come on to bitch about it, and you know their mind was already made up about before they even heard the new version making ridiculously ott statements such as "this is terrible, they've destroyed this song" blah blah blah. Do us all a favour and FUCK OFF!
@scootaymildo yh i get you people just think if you like one better than the other then you must think the others rubbish when it's just ur opinion of what you prefer.
No. Not everyone is like that. I love the original, but I don't like this one simply because it just isn't that good imo. Doesn't mean I'm wrong or right. Doesn't mean you are wrong or right. You are wrong for grouping everybody who hates this song together. That's just ignorant. And ignorant people like you still won't understand the logic I just told you, so maybe its you that needs to fuck off!
And that is how you OWN an ignorant, internet douchebad:)
@buddygroove I didn't say everyone who dislikes this version was like that, I just said there are lots of people who are, which i'm sure you know is true. I don't mind people not liking the cover, but I have an issue with people who don't listen to music with an open mind and then bitch about the cover version because they have some weird unshakable devotion to the original. You're forgiven for your mistake but that douchebad comment really burned :-)
Yeah, I got a little carried away with the last sentence. I don't even like using the words, "own" or "owned". I was trying to be one of those internet douche trolls cuz I thought you were one. ha Its all good:)
0.26 vocal auto tune makes an appearance... this has destroyed the original, its lost its charm and its fun, artic monkeys have turned it into another dull repetitive boring song.Nick Cave would be spinning in his grave... but he's not dead.
Well I'd really like to make a cover of my favorite songs too but then I come to think of what people would say. E.g. "the original is better" "this is terrible" "you ruined the song" etc. That just sucks you know. Let them do the cover.
@underwatermelons I'm sorry, I didn't know we couldn't voice our opinions here. The original is better and this is terrible. They ruined this song! And that's just my opinion. So... just forget about it.
The way some of you are going on about Nick Cave you'd think nobody was allowed to have their own interpretation on his music. Isn't that what art is? Interpretations? I enjoy this track, haven't even listened to the Nick Cave version yet. That says it all doesn't it?
It's a cover. Why wouldn't they put their own spin on it? I think it sounds awesome if you pull you head out of your pretentious asses and enjoyed it for what it is instead of trying to compare it to the original. We know Nick Cave is the man, you don't need to say it.
Not a bad cover. Obviously most originals are better. If you want to hear a shithouse cover by Nick Cave, check out his version of Johnny Cash's "Wanted Man" . Its like peeling your ears off with a cheese grater.
I think that both this and the original are great. It's like Nick Cave explored the more mysterious and dark side of the song, while the Arctic Monkeys made it more frantic and urgent.
i heard this version before i heard the nick cave version. i like this one much more... i mean really, the original just seems so boring and slow and drawn out. as a drummer, though, this song probably appeals to me more partly because of the fun drums. the other version hardly has anything going on besides the singing
If People Dont Like This Version Then Id Like To See Them Do Better Yes Nick Cave Is Better But This Is A Good Cover They Made It To Fit There Own Style So If Your Going To Diss You Poast Me A Vid Of Your Cover For Us All To Fucking Troll At :)
Of course this isn't sung or played as dark as Nick Cave thats the way he runs things, Arctic Monkeys don't. This is a fantastic cover and you need to recognize the brilliance of both bands here.
I love Nick Cave and Arctic Monkeys and I have to say they have definately made it their own but for me it lacks all the atmosphere and mood that made me love the original version.
Butthurt Nick Cave fags. Arctics clearly arn't shit. If you don't like the cover, don't listen to it. Simple. I think you're just secretly gutted because this is the better version.
It's a so and so vibe...I mean, I love their music and everything that they've recorded, but this cover isn't #1. I think it's a good cover, but its not the best one they've done
I actually like a few Arctic Monkey songs but this just isn't for me. I found the original had an overall creepiness to it whereas this seems to just sound like a clunky fast paced hard rock tune.
I love Nick Cave and Arctics. Both versions are really different which is great. The whole point in covering a song is to make it your own and they've definitely done that.
second, i respect nick cave for making this awesome song, but compared to this remake, its a little... dead... this version gives it a more kick ass feeling... the guitar, has a sort of screaming agony, giving it an edge of despair... its pretty well thought out, i give nick cave kudos for the making, but i think alex overwhelmed on the deliverance.
I'm no Arctic Monkeys fan, but then I can appreciate anybody who has the good sense to dig Mr. Cave. Not very close to the Red Right Hand I know and love, but hey, these guys did their best! *pats on the head*
It's not too bad a cover, but honestly, it doesn't really have the right sort of vibe I've associated with the Man With the Red Right Hand. It sounds too.. Happy. The MWtRRH is described as a dark figure, walking through the shadows and the hidden highways of the world. This sounds more like a beach tune than anything else.
NICK's Version is wayyy better! How's this better at all? The mystery and, excuse me, darkness, is all gone, and now it's just some alternative tune. How...?
If you listen to this song and can't help but complain how this is nothing like the original, then you should crawl back underneath your covers reading The Lords and The New Creatures. Nick Cave was always a cheap Morrison knock off.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I personally think this is a fantastic tune, merely cause i listen to arctic monkeys and there my favourite band and there fantastic, and i never heard of nick cave till they covered this song, i think the nick cave version is pathetically dull, so suck out critising the cover if you dont like it, and listen to your fuck buddy nick cave, bonvoage!
LOVELoveLOve this version too <3 xxxx
MsLadyNoire 1 week ago
wow! what a great raw punk version of Nick Cave's masterpiece
moonpielolz 1 month ago
This is fantastic!!!
Annie9421 1 month ago
I do prefer this to the original if I'm honest
NaTiOnAlHeRoWzE 1 month ago 2
Whooooooaaa! The original is a poor cousin!
sbhuyan100 2 months ago
66666 wiew
thuicdreamer 3 months ago
This song is pure awesomeness, punto e basta !
Insidethejunkroom 3 months ago
Is the image suppose to be a dick, or am i the only who sees that?
mahavishnuxc 4 months ago
@mahavishnuxc Thanks for that astute display of Freudian behaviorism.
Wonksitoxic 4 months ago
@Wonksitoxic Sigmund Freud never really dabbled in that and Behaviorist psychology has nothing to do with this.
mahavishnuxc 4 months ago
@mahavishnuxc lmao.............
JackF15 1 month ago
both versions are good. if i could i'd cover all my favorite songs but then again u people would prob just say that my verion sucked and the original was better. but do u know how many tunes and melodies artist now adays and even back as early as the 40's stole from pre-existing artists. so telling people that the orginal is better just makes YOU seem like the stupid one here. thats all i have to say of this matter.
EMOLISHISemogirl 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nick cave is a nobody, I didn't even know who he was until AM covered this song... they just gave him publicity, the ungrateful cunt
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 5 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 you dont have a fuckin clue you fuckin idiot!!!
paulpogues 5 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 did you seriously just say that nick cave is a nobody.
keesvdijkhuizen 5 months ago 2
@keesvdijkhuizen Yes, I did; if you want evidence of this, you need only to read my previous comment - you dumb sperm cell.
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 5 months ago
@keesvdijkhuizen Im here cuz of u : ) Thanks
robertsom 5 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Dude seriously if you're going to be an asshole can you go away?
TheoMackenzi 5 months ago
@TheoMackenzi fuck off u ckunt
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 5 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Do you know any more insults? Cunt's getting a little repetitive
TheoMackenzi 5 months ago
@TheoMackpacki sorry, your a fucking asshole shithead dickhead tithead prick bitch ass bastard son of a bitch dirty smelly muslim cocksucker
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 5 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 *You're
TheoMackenzi 4 months ago
@TheoMackenzi Sorry my English isn't up to standard - didn't realize this was a test!
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 4 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 It's not
TheoMackenzi 4 months ago
@TheoMackenzi Alright then, well you can stop correcting everything I spell incorrectly, no one likes a smart ass, especially a smart ass like you - adopted beat-by-his-dad piece of shit on someones shoe.
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 4 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 Nobody likes an ignorant racist prick either
TheoMackenzi 4 months ago
@TheoMackenzi Hahaha don't cry you little nigger
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 4 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 This is done it's boring and I didn't come here to argue
TheoMackenzi 4 months ago
@TheoMackenzi k cyabyecunt
CALLOFDUTYisBAD01 4 months ago
@CALLOFDUTYisBAD01
dont be a racist fuck, it's 2011 mate mature up like the rest of us
- written by a white guy.
mahavishnuxc 4 months ago
Nick Cave did it better.
KomaKidz123 5 months ago
the original SHITS on this version!
alczyn182 5 months ago
Personally, I love this version. I don't compare it to Cave's because it's not him doing it, and making an exact replica of the original kinda defeats the object of a cover, doesn't it? Arctic Monkeys have made it sound like their material, and maybe that means it isn't as powerfully atmospheric as the original, but that's the point of a cover; to put your own spin on a song. So stop whining. If you wanna listen to the original, go do that. If you like this one, that's all good too.
TheOneAndOnly674 5 months ago
Comment removed
1234babys 5 months ago
This is a one night stand.
Nick Cave is a long walk one the beach.
Followed by murder.
TeamEggInc93 5 months ago 2
Why are people complaining that it's not exactly the same of the original? That would be pointless if it was. People on youtube will complain and argue about anything.
Jakerius93 6 months ago
This is a good cover- it's a nice contrast to the the slower (but still good) original. Anyway, if so many people here don't like it, then why watch it? If you try it and don't like it, there's this amazing thing called a 'back' button in the upper left hand corner of the page that lets you return to the previous one- you can go back without posting snide remarks that everyone is tired of hearing.
cakalayjian 6 months ago
People don't hate on them because of who they are or because of their work in general. People are hating on this video because the Arctic Monkeys have removed basically all the emotion that the original one carried.
Anyone who doesn't understand, try listening to both versions while walking down a dark alley. See which one affects you.
OfficiallyErling 6 months ago
just because the monkeys decide to give the song give an upbeat tempo to a slow song doesn't mean there shit. If it does, that means Zeppelin is shit sonce they took old time blues and put a little edge to it. Both versions are awesome
ASDMarauder007 6 months ago 2
This is better than any song that actually made the Humbug album IMO.
seanrafferty100 7 months ago
As soon as they do a cover of Nick Cave there labelled as shit, which there not
menamesjames 7 months ago 3
Arctic Monkeys's awesome and Nick Cave's awesome so I cannot see what's the fucking problem with this cover!? Is just two awesomeness combined.
liquideskin 7 months ago 16
So much hate.
Fucking trolls.
Zakuma101 8 months ago 3
if you dont like something that does not necessary mean you are a troll....
nachozman7 7 months ago
I don't know of any cover that tries to be better than its original. That's the way to do a cover, is to make it your own thing.
That's why I can appreciate this.
ProfessorPher 8 months ago 2
Sounds good and all, but I don't like it. The essence of the song is missing.
TheLeonBM 8 months ago
@TheLeonBM I agree. It's really just... nothing in it. I guess it sounds fun if you're in the audience at a concert, but... isn't really worth the listen.
tibs2403 8 months ago
fuck.....this is terrible
tylermane77 8 months ago
maybe if this was covered by a better band it would sound good hard and fast but this is shit, this band is shit, it wasnt fluid, it was all fucked out all over the place
cobboGHS91 8 months ago
@cobboGHS91 So who are some bands that you consider to be not "shit"?
kmizfit36 8 months ago
this fuckin blows...nick cave is the best.
Wild6Child 8 months ago
Or is it that people just feel particularly hip for liking Nike Cave when he is not commercially known by the bubblegum masses and thus get overly protective of it? I mean how dare anyone else be inspired by NC&TBS and cover that song YOU really like ..right? lol.
kmizfit36 9 months ago
@kmizfit36 or maybe they just prefer the original?
Fivebyfive1234 9 months ago
@Fivebyfive1234 Perhaps. But that begs the question of why they are on this page grumbling instead of going to the original videos page and gushing. Seems like a waste of energy to me but whatever floats your boat man. So what are your thoughts on the Metallica cover o f" Loverman"? Did you leave them a "prefer the original" love note too? lol
kmizfit36 8 months ago
@kmizfit36 They're on this page because they saw a cover of a song they liked and they were interested. If they're being little bitches about it then they need to shut up but a few people have simply stated they prefer the original to this one which is fair enough. Do you look for people who say they like one song over the other and try to patronise them?
ICantBrap 8 months ago
@ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.
kmizfit36 8 months ago
@ICantBrap I take no issue with stating a preference, I just wonder about the motivation. A simple like/dislike button selection would suffice, but someone going out of their way to comment is obviously trying to take the piss out of this version. It just bugs me a little cuz It's a B-side and a cover and was not intended to exploit or draw fans for the Nick Cave version or fanbase. Some are coming off as ignorantly overprotective about it.
kmizfit36 8 months ago
Do people really believe when Bands do covers they are trying to TOP the original? Most times it's a mark of respect for inspiration. Doing something different to a favorite song should be on the to do list of any band... I'd also say instead of bitching about a version you don't happen to like much..try doing it better yourself. Don't tell someone what their inspirations can and cannot be and what songs they can and cannot cover though...
kmizfit36 9 months ago
The original is a million times better than this. It shouldn't be upbeat like this.
buddygroove 9 months ago
This song puts me in the mood :D
MrTingTingz 9 months ago
I love the Arctic monkey's orginals, but I don't think this does any justice to the Nick Cave version. But it was a good attempt. No one can top Nick Cave.
shueln 9 months ago
Comment removed
feelingsupersonic19 9 months ago
This version transports exactly the feeling that nick cave had when he wrote this, BUT much groovier and kickassing
vovash 10 months ago
I hate that with every cover of a cultish song that you get the die hard fans of the original who just come on to bitch about it, and you know their mind was already made up about before they even heard the new version making ridiculously ott statements such as "this is terrible, they've destroyed this song" blah blah blah. Do us all a favour and FUCK OFF!
scootaymildo 10 months ago 8
@scootaymildo definitely, i mean i prefer this to the original but that doesn't mean i don't like the original, it's like that with s many songs!
dwswh2 10 months ago
@dwswh2 The thing is I actually prefer the original but that isn't to say the arctic monkeys haven't made a good version themselves.
scootaymildo 10 months ago
@scootaymildo yh i get you people just think if you like one better than the other then you must think the others rubbish when it's just ur opinion of what you prefer.
dwswh2 10 months ago
@scootaymildo
No. Not everyone is like that. I love the original, but I don't like this one simply because it just isn't that good imo. Doesn't mean I'm wrong or right. Doesn't mean you are wrong or right. You are wrong for grouping everybody who hates this song together. That's just ignorant. And ignorant people like you still won't understand the logic I just told you, so maybe its you that needs to fuck off!
And that is how you OWN an ignorant, internet douchebad:)
buddygroove 9 months ago
@buddygroove I didn't say everyone who dislikes this version was like that, I just said there are lots of people who are, which i'm sure you know is true. I don't mind people not liking the cover, but I have an issue with people who don't listen to music with an open mind and then bitch about the cover version because they have some weird unshakable devotion to the original. You're forgiven for your mistake but that douchebad comment really burned :-)
scootaymildo 9 months ago
@scootaymildo
Yeah, I got a little carried away with the last sentence. I don't even like using the words, "own" or "owned". I was trying to be one of those internet douche trolls cuz I thought you were one. ha Its all good:)
buddygroove 8 months ago
As an Arctic Monkeys fan, I think that everything they release is pure genius. Still, this version is not nearly as good as the Nick Cave version.
=)
mKarlsson92 10 months ago 3
this makes me want to go round alex turner's house and punch him in his overhyped face, then do to him what he's done to this song
qwerty6060 10 months ago
0.26 vocal auto tune makes an appearance... this has destroyed the original, its lost its charm and its fun, artic monkeys have turned it into another dull repetitive boring song.Nick Cave would be spinning in his grave... but he's not dead.
iasonic 10 months ago
This is a good cover, it takes the quietly sinister feel of the original and puts an ubiquitous menace at the forefront.
I /prefer/ the original but this is great.
SoulIsTheGoal 1 year ago 20
Well I'd really like to make a cover of my favorite songs too but then I come to think of what people would say. E.g. "the original is better" "this is terrible" "you ruined the song" etc. That just sucks you know. Let them do the cover.
And btw. I prefer this version.
underwatermelons 1 year ago 20
@underwatermelons I'm sorry, I didn't know we couldn't voice our opinions here. The original is better and this is terrible. They ruined this song! And that's just my opinion. So... just forget about it.
adboot 11 months ago
i LOVE it!
papason4041 1 year ago
lame
SullenMorbius 1 year ago
HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! D:
xxpolahxx 1 year ago
HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! D:!!!!!!!!
xxpolahxx 1 year ago
i love artic monkeys ad i like this version but the original is the shizzz
cookiedoh666 1 year ago 4
it's a cover, not a copy. i prefer their version because it's more lively, but that's just me.
hollowKK 1 year ago 3
I prefer this version.
tocskos 1 year ago 2
The way some of you are going on about Nick Cave you'd think nobody was allowed to have their own interpretation on his music. Isn't that what art is? Interpretations? I enjoy this track, haven't even listened to the Nick Cave version yet. That says it all doesn't it?
KeyboardSwingKing 1 year ago 3
It's a cover. Why wouldn't they put their own spin on it? I think it sounds awesome if you pull you head out of your pretentious asses and enjoyed it for what it is instead of trying to compare it to the original. We know Nick Cave is the man, you don't need to say it.
packmann84 1 year ago 6
TERRIBLE
ooooooozzzz 1 year ago
wrecked the song guys. The best part about it was how the slow music matched the lyrics. HORRIBLE
kpedlow 1 year ago
You are aware of what a cover is aren't you everybody? Just saying.
FezzleBoA 1 year ago 7
where the fucks the slow menace of the original? fucking shite.
jimmybloodyjimmy 1 year ago
@rabidbanshee cunt
smiddykid 1 year ago
Why can't they just leave some songs?
BikerDarren24 1 year ago
hmm, i somehow find the AM version slightly better than Nick Caves' one
HazelnutPohl 1 year ago
helder is perfect on this track....suit him well.
Linkcrc 1 year ago
Not as good as the original, but still pretty good.
kidewinks 1 year ago
arctics do the best covers, listen to it for what it is, mint. fuck off back to the stone age haters ;(
Thecrimson08 1 year ago
omg. this is so lame
zusp123 1 year ago
Awful cover. This is so far from the mark it can't even pass as a joke.
CorndogRocket 1 year ago
yawn
seraphs123 1 year ago
i just really appreciate that bands such as arctic monkeys are covering this kind of musc instead of mainstream bullshit
kizzenzwaaah 1 year ago 2
The original sounds a lot different! They have kinda have changed the genre! Still KICKASS though!
DoubleYellowLinesUzu 1 year ago
Well, the bass-line is pretty fuckin' Louisiana cool. Sorta cleaned-up Birthday Party-style riff. Could've used some real screaming by Alex, though.
28g34ajbsd 1 year ago
i like the arctic monkeys but this is terrible nick cave version is better
RAnciD1714 1 year ago
Not bad,,,,not good but not bad either.Like aston villa
edstone1 1 year ago
Not a bad cover. Obviously most originals are better. If you want to hear a shithouse cover by Nick Cave, check out his version of Johnny Cash's "Wanted Man" . Its like peeling your ears off with a cheese grater.
jacktar207 1 year ago
@jacktar207 You obviously haven't heard Nick play this live in the 2000s :D
Cum-in-your-pants hell-hound stuff.
28g34ajbsd 1 year ago
I think that both this and the original are great. It's like Nick Cave explored the more mysterious and dark side of the song, while the Arctic Monkeys made it more frantic and urgent.
treecuttingherring 1 year ago
I listened to this song because there was an argument on a nick cave video about this being better than the NC version... It's not.
mobscene9305 1 year ago
original is much better!
lemonhead171 1 year ago
i heard this version before i heard the nick cave version. i like this one much more... i mean really, the original just seems so boring and slow and drawn out. as a drummer, though, this song probably appeals to me more partly because of the fun drums. the other version hardly has anything going on besides the singing
redhockeycab 1 year ago
no this seriously sucks ass
a really shitty cover
the are just embarrassing the great CAVE.
joselynB13 1 year ago
fantastic cover!
intrinsic1 1 year ago
Heard somewhere that this will be featured in Scream 4... any truth behind that? I suppose it makes sense, the original was in the first three.
jimbochappy 1 year ago
If People Dont Like This Version Then Id Like To See Them Do Better Yes Nick Cave Is Better But This Is A Good Cover They Made It To Fit There Own Style So If Your Going To Diss You Poast Me A Vid Of Your Cover For Us All To Fucking Troll At :)
BaM123456789o 1 year ago
....how does THIS have nearly 5 times as many views as the original?
aboydakid08 1 year ago
sounds interesting, but NICK CAVE ist the BEST!!!
DeMonfa13 1 year ago
both versions are brilliant.
cherrybomb91 1 year ago
Nick Cave is the book. Arctic Monkeys is the damn movie.
adboot 1 year ago 63
@adboot That covers just about everything. Right as rain. (:
crazynoodlelove 1 year ago
@adboot So it's dumbed down with only half the atmosphere?
yutzwagon2 1 year ago
@adboot Agreed.
slaughterose 1 year ago
@adboot LMAO this shit fucking sucks. How can u compare this to the real version.
bigboss25262 8 months ago
@adboot they're just having fun, leave them alone
martang66 7 months ago
Nick Cave can sing instead of the wimpy english vocals, sounds like a kindergarden version.
iceblueblink1 6 months ago
Of course this isn't sung or played as dark as Nick Cave thats the way he runs things, Arctic Monkeys don't. This is a fantastic cover and you need to recognize the brilliance of both bands here.
Britishsoul92 1 year ago
Comment removed
hannahisaPARASITE 1 year ago
I love Nick Cave and Arctic Monkeys and I have to say they have definately made it their own but for me it lacks all the atmosphere and mood that made me love the original version.
hannahisaPARASITE 1 year ago 2
This doesn't have shit on the original.
Shipoopiism 1 year ago 59
they did what you need to do with a cover MAKE IT YOUR OWN so shut up and just listen to the song
robertcote1 1 year ago
BOOBIESSSS!!!!!
robertcote1 1 year ago
i like both versions but if you dont like this one kindly fuck off. no one is trying to shove it down your throat.
smiddykid 1 year ago
@smiddykid touchy aye chuck!!
rabidbanshee 1 year ago
Butthurt Nick Cave fags. Arctics clearly arn't shit. If you don't like the cover, don't listen to it. Simple. I think you're just secretly gutted because this is the better version.
magiera92 1 year ago
Not good
swallowthemind 1 year ago
not a great cover
newnamethatnoonehas 1 year ago
Holy Shit......these guys suck.
CrestofLoki 1 year ago
meh don't like this version at all. yuck
NineTailsDemonFox 1 year ago
It's a so and so vibe...I mean, I love their music and everything that they've recorded, but this cover isn't #1. I think it's a good cover, but its not the best one they've done
williammoseleyfan101 1 year ago
They should stick to their own songs.This is just a bad attempt.
PrljaDebeljak 1 year ago
They totally missed the vibe of that excellent song.
TheJiggsCasey 1 year ago
original was sung alot better by nick cave :( bad attempt
rifleshot07 1 year ago
Great cover!
carreteras101 1 year ago
at least the Arctic Monkeys know who Nick Cave is... that's one thing. Kind of like eating hands.
mlmcin05 1 year ago
I actually like a few Arctic Monkey songs but this just isn't for me. I found the original had an overall creepiness to it whereas this seems to just sound like a clunky fast paced hard rock tune.
TheJurneyMan 1 year ago
What a crap.Only Nick Cave should be allowed to perform this!
ZackenZicke 1 year ago
The fuck is this? It has to be the worst cover of any song I've ever heard. And from such a shitty band too... Talentless imbeciles.
Illiterate Arctic Monkeys fanboy responses in 5... 4... 3... 2...
srj6w4u 1 year ago
@srj6w4u 1, your a dick, fuck off.
RaveOnn 1 year ago
@srj6w4u 1 your a dick fuck off.
RaveOnn 1 year ago
eh. mediocre. Original is better.
primatona 1 year ago
Insulting
gamation 1 year ago 2
rofl what the crap, way to ruin a great song, fuckin talentless assclowns
terminsane 1 year ago
This Version is horrable
Dearhunter43 1 year ago
wow i don't get it why people say it's better than original, it's totally diffrent ;o hard to relate both of them
FieryFail 1 year ago
Where would i be likely to find Arctic Monkeys EP's sold in CD form.
(I just realised i talked quite fancy in that comment :P)
ellis9111 1 year ago
I love Nick Cave and Arctics. Both versions are really different which is great. The whole point in covering a song is to make it your own and they've definitely done that.
radio4ahead237 1 year ago 2
Haha I seriously think this song is about the Devil. Me and my friend were actually listening to the lyrics, and it seems like the Devil..
SuperShanearmstrong 1 year ago
this song i would rather have on the humbug album as opposed to secret door
Isle0fRed 1 year ago
@Isle0fRed huh?
Secret door is full of win.
Rumil20 1 year ago
@Rumil20 quoting Remus Lupin," what?"
Dearhunter43 1 year ago
wtf is this shit
elmphlemp 1 year ago
I don't Care about Anything..!! I Love Arctic Monkeys!!
Axelgreyhound 1 year ago
vayanse todos a la goma par de inches ignorantes,si nos les gusta los A.M LLEGUENLEE!! ¬¬
pOchiist 1 year ago
cool, but I prefer the original
celess21 1 year ago
I would say that this is a more easy version to embrace. It's great, but so is Nick Cave and the Bad Seed's too.
Sailingman 1 year ago
First of all... how is this version happy?
second, i respect nick cave for making this awesome song, but compared to this remake, its a little... dead... this version gives it a more kick ass feeling... the guitar, has a sort of screaming agony, giving it an edge of despair... its pretty well thought out, i give nick cave kudos for the making, but i think alex overwhelmed on the deliverance.
Mattyroxx49 1 year ago
Not a patch on Cave's version.
weirdcitykid 1 year ago
Awesome cave, better than the nick cave´s original song.
sergiovk89 1 year ago
I'm no Arctic Monkeys fan, but then I can appreciate anybody who has the good sense to dig Mr. Cave. Not very close to the Red Right Hand I know and love, but hey, these guys did their best! *pats on the head*
ScreamingOnionhead 1 year ago
I'm surrounded by idiots
MrNonoz 1 year ago
WHAT is this??? TERRIBLE!
Vinzenza08 1 year ago
This is one of my favorite tracks from this album, it's an awesome cover, they make it their own.
frankiszero 1 year ago
It's not too bad a cover, but honestly, it doesn't really have the right sort of vibe I've associated with the Man With the Red Right Hand. It sounds too.. Happy. The MWtRRH is described as a dark figure, walking through the shadows and the hidden highways of the world. This sounds more like a beach tune than anything else.
syecole 1 year ago 2
NICK's Version is wayyy better! How's this better at all? The mystery and, excuse me, darkness, is all gone, and now it's just some alternative tune. How...?
StevieWonder501 1 year ago
@StevieWonder501 you say "alternative" but alternative to what? bands like arctic monkeys rule the charts...nothing alternative about that.
alexthemod1 1 year ago
@alexthemod1 You didn't get my point...this VERSION IS NOT GOOD! in my opinion..................zsdgj
StevieWonder501 1 year ago
Dig the album cover though..
PopcornNinja1 1 year ago
this version doesn't seem to gel together well, sumthing doesnt seem right, mybe the lyric theme doesn't fit indy post punk
SavageApollo 1 year ago
If you listen to this song and can't help but complain how this is nothing like the original, then you should crawl back underneath your covers reading The Lords and The New Creatures. Nick Cave was always a cheap Morrison knock off.
jdskinny212 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I personally think this is a fantastic tune, merely cause i listen to arctic monkeys and there my favourite band and there fantastic, and i never heard of nick cave till they covered this song, i think the nick cave version is pathetically dull, so suck out critising the cover if you dont like it, and listen to your fuck buddy nick cave, bonvoage!
RaveOnn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@RaveOnn
thta's exactly what i think this is much the better ver sion in my opinion as i like arctic monkeys, i don't like nick cave
17benarctic95 1 year ago