Added: 4 years ago
From: illuminator911
Views: 4,352
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @1:29..........wtf was that little flash show?

  • By the way, you can test this by hitting your head with a 1 pound hammer, first at 1 mph, then at 550 mph.

  • Your calculations are way too simplistic to describe the physics involved in this event (these are not punctual objects,so elementary physics won't apply),

    There were sequential bursts coming out the building identical to a controlled demolition as well as the symmetrical falling of the 3 buildings(find the videos).

    Can we conclude that there will be no need of experts to demolish a building as they naturally fall down that way?

    Explain the terrorist passport found at ground zero

  • Did I mention it arrived at 550 mph, approx?

  • And how many tons were each building?....what about building seven ,47 stories high and was not hit by your numbers...I mean by any airplane but FELL DOWN THE PRETTY SAME WAY TWIN TOWERS DID.uhmmm????

  • The WTC towers weighed about 500,000 tons, according to it's engineering docs. The 767 weighed 450,000 lbs, or 225 tons, or 200,000 kg.

    However, it's LINEAR MOMENTUM, or apparent weight, was 900 times that, (LE=weight x speed ) (550mph, or 900kph)

    In english terms, it's around 2 billion foot pounds, or 6200 billion joules of energy. SO, it's like a 2 billion pound weight hitting the building at 1 mph, 1 billion at 2 mph, etc.

    With building 7, the WTC took out 7 floors and a corner.

  • A 767 airplane, like those that hit the WTC, is about 450,000 pounds at takeoff, about 30 TONS, 9000 gallons, are Jet Fuel, and about 80 Tons are aluminum, and about 40 Tons are plastic.

    If that doesn't define bomb to you, go back to Dr. Suse and Barney the dinosaur.

  • Google "9/11 Cancers"

  • okay, obviously the towers went down. are we seriously saying we don't know why? could it maybe be due to the fact that there were two planes that just crashed into them?? The towers had an architectural design that causes it to fall down, instead of over, so as to protect the city. There would have been alot more damage if they were not built that way.

  • i wrote that along time ago

  • Clearly planes were part of the attack, the question is whether the buildings were prepared to be brought down. There is video of post 9/11 that shows the beams appeared to be cut at a 45 degree angle. How would the terrorists have access to plant and prep the bombs?

  • if THAT many people say theres an explosion...THERE WAS AN EXPLOSION

  • What a retard tell that to all the eyewitnesses, one that used to be my boss. It's your fault any real alternative theories get ridiculed. Keep your comments to yourself so you don't infect others with misinformation.

  • you are sutch a dumbass!!! that was live streaming video archives! I saw all the news broadcasts on 9/11, and yes, there were planes, and NO F***ING MISSILES!!!! *god damn!*

  • dude ur fucking dumb, there were people that saw the planes go in the towers, dont be an ignorant dick head

  • one of those planes hit the WTC like a missle and it looks like a computer graphic.. BUT only ONE missile.. and exploresives of course... Do I have to say that it was government job to attack the Iraq?

  • Your IQ must be under 30...

  • Lets ignore the fact that those planes cannot go that fast at that altitude, every 'live' footage shows the plane coming in at a different angle, and the fact that one of the planes had been decommissioned years ago while the other one apparently never existed at all in any records, it all really doesn't matter because lightweight aluminum cannot pierce ALL THE WAY THOUGH a structure made of steel and concrete.

  • first of all, planes are not made of "lightweight aluminum." second, every life footage shows it coming in at a different angle, hmmmmm. maybe its because the cameras were in different places? just a hunch. third, just because pilits dont drive at that speed at that altitude because they might HIT A BUILDING doesn't mean that planes can't do it if terrorists wanted to CRASH IT INTO A BUILDING.

  • stop buting into all this conspiracy bullshit. They are not strutural enginers or experts in any of this. READ DEBUNKING 911 MYTHS!!!!!!

  • Wow good for you grenseel.

    Now what about the pixie dust?

    Its neo-conservative cunts week!

    But what do you care?You are not here so, as they in England, Fuck Off.

  • i care because you yanks are fucking prats,just look at bush what a fantastic example of the great usa,shoot the fucking afgans instead of english troops,wanker

  • i have just seen a doc on channel 4 3/9/07 about 14 people serviving in the north tower,the reason they are alive is because of the way the tower fell,it was becasue of the weight and when it hit the 4th floor it blow the outer shell outwords instead of inover,all the conspiracey theoreys are proven wrong it was bin laden and he will die on the white house lawn

  • These human creatures should go pay a visit to an abattoir

  • timeforchange2007.blogspot I WILL DO SOMETHING!!!!!! HELP!!!!

  • Are you for real??? --> "3.office equipment blowing up.", "2. pockets of unburned jet fuel." LMAO...that is funny that made me actually laugh...haha...and do you belive in santa claus too?? where can office equipment blow up?? show me some evidence that office equipment blow up...post a link from youtube or something please...what can blow up?? desks?? computer screens?? 30 or more stores below at the same time that building is impolding to itself???

  • I assure you, vjetopricaci, that office equipment DOES explode when it's exposed to office fires, much less an airliner. A typical office has a whole range of high temp fuels, and you can test this by simply asking one of your local firement.

    High temp fires create their own incredible environment, different than anything your ignorant self has ever seen.

  • @Merlin5x5 LOL Obviously you have no clue of physics or science. Are you kidding me? Go look up the temeratures of Kerosene (Jet fuel) then tell me the temperature it takes to melt solid steel.

    If you actually believe the government's "official" story, you are more inclined to think Bozo the clown was on those planes as well.

  • @howdyfeller

    Nobody is claiming it melts solid steel.

    It just softens it, and at lower temps than you think.

    Explain this.

    watch?v=6AhiI3yr5-s

    or this.

    watch?v=GYOHlJKcXrg

    And I don't think Bozo the Clown was on the planes.

    I think I am typing to him right now.

  • @Merlin5x5 Oh ok, so it weakens steel to the point that it then defies phyisics and falls at free fall speed with NO resistance from the 70+ floors below, which were specifically designed NOT to collpase even if was hit multiple times by (at that time 707s). There are so many holes in the story that you follow like a sheep, its amazing you are still able to remember to breathe on a daily basis without the government telling you to do so. Also, explain Building 7s collapse. please

  • @howdyfeller LOL, if you could tell me how they could simulate FIRE, or Boeing 767 crashes, in 1968, with computers that had 512 K of hand SEWN core donut memory and Hollerith cards, with Pencil, Paper, and Slide Rules. LOL Frank DiMartini, the construction super on the WTC said that in 1974 at an interview with NO documentation. When the WTC was attacked, Frank DIED in the attack. I would call that effective counter argument, huh? I seem to be able to question YOU, JACKASS.
  • @howdyfuckface There are NO holes in the US Gov story that YOU are competent to question. That's the funny part. You could have questioned the chemistry, instead you chose to question the Math and engineering. LOL, can you be any more stupid than that? PULLING WTC#7 out of your ass won't rescue you either. The problems with FIRE and WTC#7 were so believed by the engineers, that they are spending 1.5 BILLION a year to retrofit buildings like WTC#7 all over the country. BIG FAIL, BOZO.
  • @Merlin5x5 HAHAHA What engineers? Popular science? HAHAHA you are such sheep its sad. Do your OWN Research. Please All you morons want to do is attack those with an open mind. But you will NOT do any of your own research.

    But such is the fact that Americans are easily manipulated. I am NOT one of them. I am a REAL American who lives 100 percent by the constitution which demands that the people question government.

  • @howdyfeller What engineers? ASCE, the American Society of Civil Engineers. They are the ones that BUILD Skyscrapers, high school dropout. RESEARCH is NOT googling conspiracy websites. As for your GULLIBILITY, of course you are a MINDLESS FUCKTARD! I mean, you were convinced of this by a website. How fucking weak-minded is that?? Did you demand physical evidence? Did you read the official NIST and FEMA and FBI reports? Because I have, and I am an engineer. Dumbass.
  • @Merlin5x5 These are NOT websites I visit, this is common knowledge for anyone with a brain. I know people personally involved and affected by this treasonous act and I will NEVER let it go until I have resolution against those who killed people I know. In addition, I was a firm believer of the "official story" until 2004 when personal friends and relatives from NYC came forward with their knowledge of payoffs their collegues recieved to keep quiet.

  • @howdyfucker Really? Common knowledge for everyone who has left this issue behind them, and forgotten about conspiracy nutjobs like you? I seem to have missed that. LOL Ever notice how people claim they were converted? You know that's bullshit. LOL Circus Carnys used to bark that bullshit to the rubes visiting the carnival. LOL, Could you please tell me when and were you READ the "Official Story" and quote from there? Thanks.
  • @Merlin5x5 The 9.11 Commission Report. Go look at it. It is a pile of useless nonsense, just the same as the nonsense the sheep spew. Sorry, but I am NOT going to forget this and put it behind me. There are serious questions that MUST be answered.  We have 2 wars going on, killing our American soldiers based on this myth that was 9/11. Until I have ALL Questions answered, it will never be let go or forgotten

  • @howdyfeller Tell me, if you have read the 9/11 Commission Report, HOW MANY federal agencies did they question? I think the executive summary lists 200+ agencies, and 400+ companies. LOL Want to make a guess how many competent engineers participated in this pile of useless nonsense? LOL Tell me this, why would the US Attack Itself, and LOSE the encounter? IF I were controlling both sides of the battle, I would win. A "HERO" is better than a LOSER, politically.
  • @howdyfeller

    Tell me this, super-genius, if thermite is your thing,

    How did they ignite the thermite on the steel, at

    1800 degrees ignition temp for thermite, without

    reaching the 600 degrees that steel fails at?

    LOL

    That would be a trick, huh?

  • @Merlin5x5 Thermate, not thermite. Addition of sulfer to Thermite results in themate which can easily cut steel in a matter of seconds. Again, do some chemistry.

    No trick at all, again do some research as to the "special maintenance" performed on both twin towers 2 weeks before 9/11. Charges we most likely planted well before the date of the destruction. Look up Thermate

  • @howdyfeller

    Thermate doesn't make a shitload worth of diff,

    sesame street engineer. You still have to IGNITE IT.

    IF you had read ANYTHING about thermite, even

    on Wikipedia, you would learn you can't ignite

    thermite with common demolition tools.

    LOL

    BUSTED AGAIN, amateur.

  • @Merlin5x5 You moron they didn't use thermite to blow up the towers, they used it to weaken the columns so that the explosives made sure all of it would be blown up.

  • @Xendrius NOT according to the Steven Jones wierdos. According to them, they used thermite. The story changes, doesn't it? LOL Now, my question to you is the same as to ALL the others. IF Thermite / thermate was used, where is the IRON? Either one burns aluminum to create a PURE LIQUID IRON. When it cools, it creates a huge volumn of black iron. Where is it? Remember, any heat that enters the steel, MUST come from the thermite, so it cools on contact. Where is the IRON?
  • @Merlin5x5 Where is the IRON, ask Bush who shipped off all the rubble and melted down the steel and whose done away with all the other 911 debry.

    Clear forensic proof of thermite used has been found by alot of people who examined the dust after the "collapse".

    We aint dealing with some retards here we are dealing with the most wealthy and technologically advanced government in the world, these guys aint leaving anything to chance.

    So what is your belief anyway about 911?

  • @Xendrius LOL, Sorry, Kooktard. The Contract to recycle WTC STEEL wasn't signed until 11/3/2003, over a year after 9/11, 2001. SEE? Deliveries didn't start shipping from FRESH KILLS till mid 2004. That Bullshit report by Steven Jones? Created by "S&J Scientic"? THAT is a single, semi retired BYU professor who borrows equipment from BYU labs when he made that report. His picture is on page 22, working in his GARAGE laboratory. THAT's why they had to PAY $800 TO PUBLISH IT.
  • @Merlin5x5 None of that matters there is enough evidence out there and even a fraction of it alone proves that 100% was a pure inside job, you have no idea what we are dealing with here and what these guys agenda is, you probably have never even heard about the Illuminati either, do yourself a favor and read the 25 Illuminati goals that were written down in the late 1700s and tell me if not each and single one of those goals apply to how america has and is being run.

  • @howdyfeller Look, FuckForBrains, why not tell me what YOUR research was? We both know you read conspiracy websites, explain to me how you challenged them? I have been a member of Ae911Truth, and Pilotsfor911Bs. Payed their dues for 3 months, and never met or chatted with an engineer, or a pilot. Have you? When I saw a NAME of an engineer on their website, I called the city, and their ASCE branch. I NEVER was able to confirm professional certification for a single ae911 engineer.
  • @Merlin5x5 My research is a combination of facts presented WHILE this was going on. People that I know personally who worked for and inside the buildings that collpased. Relatives that WORK for the NYC Police and fire departments.

    You want to call me out you freaking traitor, go for it! Most of those puppets you get your information were paid off to shut up. THAT IS A FACT, of course I can not substantiate it unless you know personally people that work for the departments in question.

  • OR, since you believe in videos, lol.

    Why not rent backdraft, that old fire fighting movie? It shows you that even an empty room explodes in a high temp fire, in a backdraft, oddly, lol.

  • Are you serious??? Or are you just being ironic??

  • Are you serious??? Are are you kidding??

  • The comment that really made it click for me was, "you don't find a phone, you don't find a desk, you don't find a computer, [...]". The moment I first heard that, I realized what really happened - bizarre feeling.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more