And explain what those explosions, squibs, blasts, whatever you want to call them are. What you'll see in the video includes flashes of light, ejections of smoke and even bursting of windows, which fully fit the definition of "explosion". Just explain what you believe was causing all these explosions, or whatever YOU want to call them and explain them in relation to the fires. Thanks, I look forward to it.
@N1k1mon "And explain what those explosions, squibs, blasts, whatever you want to call them are."
it's pretty obvious they are large glass panels popping out. how dumb are you? how bad do you WANT the conspiracy to be true? had you ever seen the building in person? ever been in it? know anything about it from first-hand experience? if you did, you wouldn't be so puzzled.
"...which fully fit the definition of "explosion". - no they don't.
THere's a few more things that would need to be proven but what I'm interested about is getting to the point where all this steel is so weakened by fire that the entire building below the affected areas was rendered incapable of handling the load it had always handled. Next could you do me a favor and watch a vid called 9/11 raw schocking visable proof explosion (I know they mispelled visible)
wait, you want me to explain what NIST covered in thousands of pages of expert analysis? and you want me to do it here? HAHAHAHAHA!! fucking truthtards. so goddam stupid it boggles the mind.
"watch a vid called 9/11 raw" -- already saw it. it sucks. and like 99% of truthtard videos, you have to WANT to believe the inside job theory to take it seriously. it is a piece of shit and a joke, much like the entire truth movement.
They were recorded at 90-100C 15 minutes after impact and firefighters on the 78th floor said they could knock them down with 2 hand lines. In order for your argument to have any strength, you'd have to define the melting point of steel and show proof the fires got anywhere near that temp. Then prove that the fires had the ability to translate that heat to the steel (as opposed to fires burning but not touching/hearing the steel).
@N1k1mon "firefighters on the 78th floor said they could knock them down with 2 hand lines"
wrong again, son. ONE firefighter who was not aware of the size of the fire said that. he was tragically wrong and likely died shortly after making that claim but truthers don't mind using this guys words and lying about them like you just did.
you must have never seen the building if you think one man can tell the size of the entire fire when he was under it. do more research.
Why do you keep asking about the fire proofing on your little channel here? Obviously fire proofing is put on steel to add another element of protection to it during fires. Life is unpredictable and unexpected things can happen, safety precautions are a wise way to plan for those things. Nevertheless, those fires got nowhere near the temp to weaken the steel significantly, let alone melt it.
@N1k1mon "Why do you keep asking about the fire proofing"
because truthtards love to say "fire can't melt steel." If that is true (it isn't) why would fireproofing be added? You really don't understand the question?
"those fires got nowhere near the temp to weaken the steel significantly"
you're wrong. they did.
and thanks for contradicting truthtard orthodox. nice to see some of you clowns thinking outside the alex jones talking points.
@Soulfree2008 an issue you had nothing to do with? are you kidding? let me lay it out. you're a truther, and truthers believe fire can't melt steel. so you do have something to do with it. plus, you chimed in when someone else attempted (and failed) to answer, so you involved yourself, didn't you? something about "dismantled." now, with all due respect, why not answer the question?
@Soulfree2008 - so you just dont have the balls to answer such a simple straight-forward question. is that what we're dealing with here? a self-proclaimed "seeker of knowledge" (what a joke) who will do and say just about anything to avoid responding to a question that cuts to the heart of one of the most long-lasting and popular truther talking points. try not to be such a pussy, would ya? at the very least, have the balls to come out and say you don't have the balls to answer.
@Soulfree2008 "I would talk more right now, but..." no problem. you can explain why fireproofing is added to steel during construction when you get back. remember, you truthers think fire can't melt steel. so why in the world do they put fireproofing on the steel during construction? come on now, truther, this has to be the 15th time I've asked you this simple question. what are you so afraid of? after all, the inside jobbyjob is so obvious this should be easy to explain away.
@Soulfree2008 - if it believes stupid shit like a truthtard, denies reality like a truthtard, thinks bermas uses logic like a truthtard, and avoids simple questions like a truthtard, well...you're a truthtard. you repeat bermas' bullshit, so even though you know he is an embarrassment and you want to distance yourself from his despicable claim that the firemen were paid off, you most certainly do have an interest in him. so what about that fireproofing. still scared to tackle that one?
@Soulfree2008 "No one of any caliber claims the firefighters were paid off..."
bermas did. I'll agree he is not someone of any "caliber" as you put it, but he is a leader and hero to the truthtard movement. and Larry didn't "CLEARLY" say "the powers" (ha!) "made the decision to bring down the building" either.
Yeah, "watch the DVD" means: "Im too fucking stupid to respond to your debunking. So I want you to go away and watch the DVD later so I dont have to respond to you now."
im not defending anyone and i dont believe firemen were paid off, because their were countless number of firemen saying they heard and felt explosions coming from the base of the towers. they even said it on the CNN NBC FNS, but its pretty obvious you guys dont really care about this... so why dont u guys go back to watching the hills or whatever junk u losers watch.
"im not defending anyone" the hell you're not. first of all, if you think the PopMech eggheads didnt mop the floor with those two jerkoffs, you have your head up your ass. you only think they were making shit up because you dont understand what they were saying. second, you were impressed with bermas because he had "attitude" which, for some reason, resonates with the stupid.
so if you admit the firemen knew it was collapsing, how did they know if they werent in on it? explain yourself.
thats horseshit, those popular mechanics guys were just pulling things out of their asses, avoiding almost every single question. if you ask me they didnt even look like they knew what they were talking about, u can tell bermas was upset cause they were just giving the run around... tards.
he is quite the idiot. my favorite was the debate between the loose change guys and the popular mechanics people. The guys from popular mechanics completely owned them, in a respectable way. Jason bermas tries insulting the popular mechanics guys, calling them liars and whatnot.
jason bermas wouldnt write this!!!!! your outta your fukn mind!!!! omg rofl lol! comedy for the day!this proves nothing! as usual
bushdidit2u911 1 year ago
@bushdidit2u911
jerkoff, here it is...
watch?v=TJeRBNBDwFs
suck it up and accept that your beloved hero is a despicable scumbag.
"the firefighters are paid off" - Jason Bermas
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
Tis a sad thing to be retarded, but not as sad as a retard saying that someone else is retarded. Beam me up scottie... ):
wordgeezer 1 year ago
@ognamas
I knew you were a truthtard.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
And explain what those explosions, squibs, blasts, whatever you want to call them are. What you'll see in the video includes flashes of light, ejections of smoke and even bursting of windows, which fully fit the definition of "explosion". Just explain what you believe was causing all these explosions, or whatever YOU want to call them and explain them in relation to the fires. Thanks, I look forward to it.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon "And explain what those explosions, squibs, blasts, whatever you want to call them are."
it's pretty obvious they are large glass panels popping out. how dumb are you? how bad do you WANT the conspiracy to be true? had you ever seen the building in person? ever been in it? know anything about it from first-hand experience? if you did, you wouldn't be so puzzled.
"...which fully fit the definition of "explosion". - no they don't.
what's causing this? are you serious?
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
THere's a few more things that would need to be proven but what I'm interested about is getting to the point where all this steel is so weakened by fire that the entire building below the affected areas was rendered incapable of handling the load it had always handled. Next could you do me a favor and watch a vid called 9/11 raw schocking visable proof explosion (I know they mispelled visible)
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon
wait, you want me to explain what NIST covered in thousands of pages of expert analysis? and you want me to do it here? HAHAHAHAHA!! fucking truthtards. so goddam stupid it boggles the mind.
"watch a vid called 9/11 raw" -- already saw it. it sucks. and like 99% of truthtard videos, you have to WANT to believe the inside job theory to take it seriously. it is a piece of shit and a joke, much like the entire truth movement.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Unclesamsnephew666
They were recorded at 90-100C 15 minutes after impact and firefighters on the 78th floor said they could knock them down with 2 hand lines. In order for your argument to have any strength, you'd have to define the melting point of steel and show proof the fires got anywhere near that temp. Then prove that the fires had the ability to translate that heat to the steel (as opposed to fires burning but not touching/hearing the steel).
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon "firefighters on the 78th floor said they could knock them down with 2 hand lines"
wrong again, son. ONE firefighter who was not aware of the size of the fire said that. he was tragically wrong and likely died shortly after making that claim but truthers don't mind using this guys words and lying about them like you just did.
you must have never seen the building if you think one man can tell the size of the entire fire when he was under it. do more research.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Unclesamsnephew666
Why do you keep asking about the fire proofing on your little channel here? Obviously fire proofing is put on steel to add another element of protection to it during fires. Life is unpredictable and unexpected things can happen, safety precautions are a wise way to plan for those things. Nevertheless, those fires got nowhere near the temp to weaken the steel significantly, let alone melt it.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon "Why do you keep asking about the fire proofing"
because truthtards love to say "fire can't melt steel." If that is true (it isn't) why would fireproofing be added? You really don't understand the question?
"those fires got nowhere near the temp to weaken the steel significantly"
you're wrong. they did.
and thanks for contradicting truthtard orthodox. nice to see some of you clowns thinking outside the alex jones talking points.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Soulfree2008 an issue you had nothing to do with? are you kidding? let me lay it out. you're a truther, and truthers believe fire can't melt steel. so you do have something to do with it. plus, you chimed in when someone else attempted (and failed) to answer, so you involved yourself, didn't you? something about "dismantled." now, with all due respect, why not answer the question?
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Soulfree2008 - so you just dont have the balls to answer such a simple straight-forward question. is that what we're dealing with here? a self-proclaimed "seeker of knowledge" (what a joke) who will do and say just about anything to avoid responding to a question that cuts to the heart of one of the most long-lasting and popular truther talking points. try not to be such a pussy, would ya? at the very least, have the balls to come out and say you don't have the balls to answer.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Soulfree2008 "I would talk more right now, but..." no problem. you can explain why fireproofing is added to steel during construction when you get back. remember, you truthers think fire can't melt steel. so why in the world do they put fireproofing on the steel during construction? come on now, truther, this has to be the 15th time I've asked you this simple question. what are you so afraid of? after all, the inside jobbyjob is so obvious this should be easy to explain away.
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Soulfree2008 - if it believes stupid shit like a truthtard, denies reality like a truthtard, thinks bermas uses logic like a truthtard, and avoids simple questions like a truthtard, well...you're a truthtard. you repeat bermas' bullshit, so even though you know he is an embarrassment and you want to distance yourself from his despicable claim that the firemen were paid off, you most certainly do have an interest in him. so what about that fireproofing. still scared to tackle that one?
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
@Soulfree2008 "No one of any caliber claims the firefighters were paid off..."
bermas did. I'll agree he is not someone of any "caliber" as you put it, but he is a leader and hero to the truthtard movement. and Larry didn't "CLEARLY" say "the powers" (ha!) "made the decision to bring down the building" either.
do you know anything at all about this subject?
unclesamsnephew666 1 year ago
Yeah, "watch the DVD" means: "Im too fucking stupid to respond to your debunking. So I want you to go away and watch the DVD later so I dont have to respond to you now."
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
im not defending anyone and i dont believe firemen were paid off, because their were countless number of firemen saying they heard and felt explosions coming from the base of the towers. they even said it on the CNN NBC FNS, but its pretty obvious you guys dont really care about this... so why dont u guys go back to watching the hills or whatever junk u losers watch.
CRS10999 2 years ago
"im not defending anyone" the hell you're not. first of all, if you think the PopMech eggheads didnt mop the floor with those two jerkoffs, you have your head up your ass. you only think they were making shit up because you dont understand what they were saying. second, you were impressed with bermas because he had "attitude" which, for some reason, resonates with the stupid.
so if you admit the firemen knew it was collapsing, how did they know if they werent in on it? explain yourself.
unclesamsnephew666 2 years ago
so you've decided the defend the scumbag who said "the firemen are paid off." you felt he and the bullshit he spews are worthy of your efforts.
what a piece of shit.
unclesamsnephew666 2 years ago
thats horseshit, those popular mechanics guys were just pulling things out of their asses, avoiding almost every single question. if you ask me they didnt even look like they knew what they were talking about, u can tell bermas was upset cause they were just giving the run around... tards.
CRS10999 2 years ago
he is quite the idiot. my favorite was the debate between the loose change guys and the popular mechanics people. The guys from popular mechanics completely owned them, in a respectable way. Jason bermas tries insulting the popular mechanics guys, calling them liars and whatnot.
chodemaster2009 2 years ago
And now he is Alex Jone' new bitch .
ComradeAgopian 2 years ago