@celticlofts Interesting the Polish units were defending Paris and fighting for the French ( some always has to fight for the French) why didn't the French come to the aid of the Polish, Im sure by then the mighty French army could have taken on the Soviets!!!
@hitide286 France was not prepared either militarily or morally for a new war.
Yet the French have declared war on Germany for Poland. we can blame the French for not attacking western Germany, but certainly not for not supporting the Poles (who were close friends of France).
the French would never have attacked the Soviet Union because the communists were strong in France.
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
@lakas50 But the Soviets only attacked the Germans 'cause Hitler started invading Russia, otherwise, the Soviets contributed to the invasion of Poland at the beginning of the war. You can see Nazis and Reds shaking hands in 1939
Los primeros en entrar en Paris fueron los españoles de la División Leclerc, a las órdenes de De Gaulle. Soldados veteranos de la Guerra Civil española. Los nombres de los tanques llevaban nombres de batallas españolas como "Brunete", pero los franceses borraron eso de las fotografías.
on the news, it said that the Non-french colonial troops were deliberatly kept out of the Paris liberation. and that the All white French unit that officially entered Paris was made up of white dudes hastily brought from bases in Morocco!! D'Gaul wanted the false image of just the French liberating France! at the time, the French army was only 40% European!
Considering how poorly the Moroccan and gourmiers behaved in Italy, he was wise to keep them out. It was the US and Commonwealth who did most of the fighting, the French were there for political reasons only.
@jakefree25, the Moroccan and goumiers fought bravely in Italy, participating in the breakthrough to Rome. Sure, off the combat line, they behaved like the medieval troops they were, not in modern army standards. As for the Free French, they fought in the front line from 1940 to 1945, and paid with blood - battle of England, Bir Hakeim, Tunisia, Italy, operation Anvil, Alsace... up to Berchtesgaden. For political reasons ? Of course: Which country was in the war for sport?
@atemlos2585 the Polish got the worst of Hitlers dumbass, "Master Race" bullshit and almost a third of Polands population was murdered. you damn right they were pissed and foaming at the mouth. Rage is a hell of an anesthetic and the only way to get them to stop was to drown itself in Nazi blood.
By that I mean perhaps even helped them destroy the Red Beasts. Kind of like when the dirty Soviets helped Germany take over and occupy Poland. Then they fought.
absolutly false story..reality were more prosaical and all could be happily concluded without Communist Georgians in Nazi uniforms provoke the masses to try STOPPING Allied forces to arrive to RHINE
@Abridgedfan134 who does?...and after getting their arses saved by eveyone eles in two WW's, why would you. When all the fighting was going on where was DeGaulle????
@hitide286 Saved? France fought through the first world war for its entirety. Losing 1,397,800 soldiers. While what did America do? Waited until the final years of the war to send troops and relieved pressure off the French by attacking Chateau-Thierry and Balleau wood. They also saved the second Battle of the Marne. I am not disregarding what American soldiers did but how can you say "We saved you" when we fought for 4 years with out British friends and bled our population white.
@Rizr Sniper Just for clarification, the "save you" comment was not intended to minimise the effort and sacrifices France made on its own behalf in WWI, but I need not remind you that it was (WWI) a European conflict, and France declared war on Germany, seem they did that TWICE..& COULD not finish the job by themselves..there is an old American saying " dont start a fight with the toughest kid on the block...if you can't FINISH it..." BTW where was De Gaulle when all the fighting was going on?
@hitide286 He had been demoted and sent to North Africa, because he had disobyed orders, and had grouped his armour together copying the German, example, and had beat an armoured column, almost killing Rommel in the process. This sterotypeis not deserved. The French troops were well trained and extremly capable, and the armour was better then anything the Germans. The French lost because of their Senior command where pigheaded, stubborn, and many were spympathetic to the Nazi Ideals
@canada loves whiskey What units ( and dates)..did DeGaulle command?...He was in N. Africa in 1940 &1941??? really...most verifiable facts put him in London for four years...until all the fighting was over...I have the utmost respect for LeClerc...now he was a real hero...btw...when the Germans planned a counter attack on Paris..it was a Polish unit that turned them back..not French...and what "superior" armour did the French have...cooking pans?
@hitide286 Early French tanks were far superior to German Tanks, the Panzer I, and II's were poor quality, the Panzer I were outfitted with machine guns while the Panzer II had a very small gun, it was superior German Taticts that won the Battle of France, not technology. As for Du Gaulle all I really know is that he was sent to North Africa before leaving for London after the Fall of France
GO POLISH 1ST ARMOUR DEVISION!
Raptorkingdom1 2 weeks ago
the key to victory lies in a book, one book called sun tzu the Art of War it is truly a facinating book.
TheIcelandicPatriot 1 year ago
@TheIcelandicPatriot indeed, i agree
peanutbutter11385 1 year ago
Sadly all those Polish troops who fought with the Allies against the Germans were sold down the river.
celticlofts 1 year ago 2
@celticlofts Interesting the Polish units were defending Paris and fighting for the French ( some always has to fight for the French) why didn't the French come to the aid of the Polish, Im sure by then the mighty French army could have taken on the Soviets!!!
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 France was not prepared either militarily or morally for a new war.
Yet the French have declared war on Germany for Poland. we can blame the French for not attacking western Germany, but certainly not for not supporting the Poles (who were close friends of France).
the French would never have attacked the Soviet Union because the communists were strong in France.
DuguesclinBZH 10 months ago
in war,..they are rules....
1)dont march to moscow
2)dont attack unless u have to
3)know ur enemy well
and i think Tsun Tzu forget one thing,...
4)dont mess with polls!
armanazuki08 1 year ago 2
Did Hitler had any connection to india ?? cuz he was as corrupted and racist like those piece of trash indians !!
shrestha841 1 year ago
still the poles did a good job, even in the first day of world war 2 when hitler
ordered the blitz, the poles did everything in there power to fight both the
russians and the nazis, and that is how the poles showed the real meaning of
bravery and valor. still the french resistance moves my heart, even if they are
ordinary civilians they fought against there oppressors,
warkeeper23 1 year ago
Of course they where backed by the russians, poland at this point of time is receiving command from stalin
HungerStrikeUs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
amirturist25 2 years ago
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
amirturist25 2 years ago
the western allies had no posibility to win the war if there wasn't SOVIET UNION.the soviets actually won the war
lakas50 2 years ago
@lakas50 But the Soviets only attacked the Germans 'cause Hitler started invading Russia, otherwise, the Soviets contributed to the invasion of Poland at the beginning of the war. You can see Nazis and Reds shaking hands in 1939
audifaxcimeski 2 years ago
A famous saying amongst American soldiers during those days: "Alright !!! ... Who's the selfish slob that ate all the foie grass ... ?!!!!"
fredhubner 2 years ago
Los primeros en entrar en Paris fueron los españoles de la División Leclerc, a las órdenes de De Gaulle. Soldados veteranos de la Guerra Civil española. Los nombres de los tanques llevaban nombres de batallas españolas como "Brunete", pero los franceses borraron eso de las fotografías.
doraemondejatokyo 2 years ago
on the news, it said that the Non-french colonial troops were deliberatly kept out of the Paris liberation. and that the All white French unit that officially entered Paris was made up of white dudes hastily brought from bases in Morocco!! D'Gaul wanted the false image of just the French liberating France! at the time, the French army was only 40% European!
acerb45666555 2 years ago
Considering how poorly the Moroccan and gourmiers behaved in Italy, he was wise to keep them out. It was the US and Commonwealth who did most of the fighting, the French were there for political reasons only.
jakefree25 2 years ago
@jakefree25, the Moroccan and goumiers fought bravely in Italy, participating in the breakthrough to Rome. Sure, off the combat line, they behaved like the medieval troops they were, not in modern army standards. As for the Free French, they fought in the front line from 1940 to 1945, and paid with blood - battle of England, Bir Hakeim, Tunisia, Italy, operation Anvil, Alsace... up to Berchtesgaden. For political reasons ? Of course: Which country was in the war for sport?
Fridomfry 1 year ago
is that a women firing at 5:58
kyle887923 2 years ago
French resistance most likely.
aaKonda 2 years ago
poles are tough mother fuckers.
atemlos2585 3 years ago 31
The Polish sodiers were the most experienced in fighting against the Nazis.
Grzech0007 2 years ago 5
@atemlos2585
Indeed they are! I think that their country has been conqured 4 times during the last 500 years, but the polish people always rise up again.
TormentedSoldier1337 1 year ago
@atemlos2585 the Polish got the worst of Hitlers dumbass, "Master Race" bullshit and almost a third of Polands population was murdered. you damn right they were pissed and foaming at the mouth. Rage is a hell of an anesthetic and the only way to get them to stop was to drown itself in Nazi blood.
legendarytoyou 1 year ago
By that I mean perhaps even helped them destroy the Red Beasts. Kind of like when the dirty Soviets helped Germany take over and occupy Poland. Then they fought.
Joseph565112 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We really should have let these guys kill the Soviet Beasts first. Then dealt with them in some way or another.
Joseph565112 3 years ago
how is this false history if its false tell me what happend and prove it
taco11555 3 years ago 2
absolutly false story..reality were more prosaical and all could be happily concluded without Communist Georgians in Nazi uniforms provoke the masses to try STOPPING Allied forces to arrive to RHINE
vertxxgg 3 years ago
Comment removed
redSHIFT69 3 years ago
You have no respect for the french have you?
Abridgedfan134 3 years ago 17
@Abridgedfan134 who does?...and after getting their arses saved by eveyone eles in two WW's, why would you. When all the fighting was going on where was DeGaulle????
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 Saved? France fought through the first world war for its entirety. Losing 1,397,800 soldiers. While what did America do? Waited until the final years of the war to send troops and relieved pressure off the French by attacking Chateau-Thierry and Balleau wood. They also saved the second Battle of the Marne. I am not disregarding what American soldiers did but how can you say "We saved you" when we fought for 4 years with out British friends and bled our population white.
Rizrsniper 1 year ago 2
@Rizr Sniper Just for clarification, the "save you" comment was not intended to minimise the effort and sacrifices France made on its own behalf in WWI, but I need not remind you that it was (WWI) a European conflict, and France declared war on Germany, seem they did that TWICE..& COULD not finish the job by themselves..there is an old American saying " dont start a fight with the toughest kid on the block...if you can't FINISH it..." BTW where was De Gaulle when all the fighting was going on?
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 He had been demoted and sent to North Africa, because he had disobyed orders, and had grouped his armour together copying the German, example, and had beat an armoured column, almost killing Rommel in the process. This sterotypeis not deserved. The French troops were well trained and extremly capable, and the armour was better then anything the Germans. The French lost because of their Senior command where pigheaded, stubborn, and many were spympathetic to the Nazi Ideals
canadaloveswhiskey 9 months ago
@canada loves whiskey What units ( and dates)..did DeGaulle command?...He was in N. Africa in 1940 &1941??? really...most verifiable facts put him in London for four years...until all the fighting was over...I have the utmost respect for LeClerc...now he was a real hero...btw...when the Germans planned a counter attack on Paris..it was a Polish unit that turned them back..not French...and what "superior" armour did the French have...cooking pans?
hitide286 9 months ago
@hitide286 Early French tanks were far superior to German Tanks, the Panzer I, and II's were poor quality, the Panzer I were outfitted with machine guns while the Panzer II had a very small gun, it was superior German Taticts that won the Battle of France, not technology. As for Du Gaulle all I really know is that he was sent to North Africa before leaving for London after the Fall of France
canadaloveswhiskey 9 months ago
@hitide286: Well in 1940 French tanks were actually BETTER than German tanks. The French lost due to poor tactics and leadership.
NobleKorhedron 1 month ago
@Rizrsniper Do you mean with our British Freinds in your comment ?
TheLloydA1 4 months ago