Time or in Hellenic Κρόνος .The god thats eating his children or in other words Life is to short.time time time time time time. more time time. i nead more time .your time my time everybodys time.One of the ultimate gods Κρόνος Cronus(Latin: Saturnus ), a Titan, the father of Zeus, Poseidon, Hades, Hestia, Demeter, Hera, and Chiron
@ACspainDC What a load of crap. Then how come scientists have been unable to create life? If it has been "duplicated in the lab" (which supports creation as the lab is a controlled environment where things occur as a result of the application of intelligence from an intelligent source which is the experimenters) then why have scientists failed to created life after trying for hundreds of years? except life is far more complex than just a mixture of "organic molecules".
@AC by "a background in natural sciences" you mean....?You are technically implying that evolution is natural sciences and that i must believe in it to be deemed knowledgable of science.You are wrong, evolution is not natural science, natural science deals with life and the complexity of all living anatom, which is carefully explained by the theory of Intelligent Design, evolution is just a Darwanian theory suggesting that a fish magically turned to man, that is not "natural science", its bull.
@ACioDC Nope, wrong. I just enjoy watching educative videos, especially on youTube because i also have my videos on here. So am not a troll at all. And it just ticks me off when i come across comments of people who are totally ignorant of what they are talking about.
@ACioDC The title decieved me, i thought it was an educative video on the history of the universe. when i realised it was a load of crap, i was kinda pissed.
@ACioDC listen, evolution is not a scientific concept, its a darwanian concept developed by Darwin about 150 years ago. Maybe the man was hallucinating when he developed the theory that man evolved from fishes cos he had no basis to support that fact and only a moron would claim or believe that man was once a fish.
So, stop confusing your moronic darwanian concepts with real scientific concepts. Science does not claim that humans are fishes, it was Darwin that did. Darwinism is not science.
You really have no understanding of evolution if you keep repeating that it claims we were 'once a fish'.
Also, Darwin may have been the first to posit the (scientific) theory of evolution through natural selection, but he was by no means the last. Then there's the fact that Darwin was a scientist, and he came to his conclusions using the scientific method, meaning his concept are scientific instead of (or as well as) 'darwanian'. (??)
@Caedyron Well, according to evolution, the first life form (single celled organism) evolved into a fish doesn't it? And then the fish magically developed legs, came on land and all that crap. Darwin was not a scientist, he was a naturalist, there is a difference, he had no qualification needed today to be considered a true scientist. He did not come to conclusions using the scientific method, according to him, he "observed", and that is done by looking, wat conclusions can you get from that??.
@theaccousticaddict "...according to evolution, the first life form (...) evolved into a fish..."
No, that is not what evolution claims. I suggest you do research first, then comment.
Where else do you get your conclusions from, if not from looking/observing?
Scientific method:
"a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic OBSERVATION, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
@Caedyron I think you should study your false theory more. That is exaclty what evolution claims. A fish over millions of years developed a leg and stepped on land. That is what all evolutionists claim, so if you disagree, then you have no idea what evolution is.
how can you tell that living organisms evolved over millions of years ago just by observing it? That is totally impossible. you can tell how organisms function by observing, but you cant tell whether they evolved over millions of years
@Caedyron Modification of hypothesis?? Sounds to me like the construction and and refining of lies in order for people to believe it as truth. A hypothesis is not the truth, and modifying a hypothesis is trying to advertise something which is not truth so that people will buy it.
@ACioDC "We went through a long process of evolution" and how do you know that? I have not seen any process of evolution in humans, its not as if we had wings before and now we dont, or that we had 3 legs before and now we dont. Humans have always been humans just as all animals still remain the same, having evolved from the same common ancestor of their kind. Nature is easy to understand, the evolutionists is confusing the minds of the ignorance once by feeding them lies.
@ACioDC Evolution excludes and contradict all posibilities of any sort of intelligent source having any intelligent input to the existence of living organisms and the complexity of its anatomy. No evolutionist would tell you that there's a chance that life came from a living or intelligence source, they will claim that millions of years ago, certain chemicals came together to form life, that life got complex by natural selection. Its just like saying "nature created nature" it doesnt make sense.
@ACioDC I believe that life can only come from a living source and that intelligence can only come from an intelligent source. Do you agree or disagree? The choice you make will determine your level of understanding of the life you are living as well as all living things. Evolution is just a theory developed so that none chiristans can have an alternative explanation to God's creation without including God. Carl Sagan may have been a brillian astronomer, but he wasn't all knowing.
It is not a question of us disagreeing or agreeing. Soon as something is considered fact, our personal interpretation of the issue is irrelevant. It is a fact that evolution is true. You can come up with any number of reasons why you THINK it is not, but unless you come up with evidence which disproves it, it remains your (unfounded) opinion.
Myself, I am of the opinion that you are ignorant. An opinion backed by the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.
@Caedyron "It is fact that evolution is true" no its not, its no fact, just a hypothetical theory developed by Darwin some 150 years ago, just because you have capitalised on it over the years does not make it fact. From the moment of creation, living organisms have always reproduced after their own kind thanks to DNA and gene, so the false claim that a fish developed legs is total BS because it is not in their gene or DNA to grow legs, just fins, and it has always remained fins.
@Caedyron "It is fact that evolution is true" no its not, its no fact, just a hypothetical theory developed by Darwin some 150 years ago, just because you have capitalised on it over the years does not make it fact. From the moment of creation, living organisms have always reproduced after their own kind thanks to DNA and gene, so the false claim that a fish developed legs is total BS because it is not in their gene or DNA to grow legs, just fins, and it has always remained fins.
I'm not going to debate with you about whether it is a fact. It is. Thing is, it's also a theory. But not in the way you use the words. "Scientific Theory". Again, I suggest you look up what they actually mean. There are lots of dictionaries a single google away. If you don't know enough to research the topic and instead keep regurgitating the same debunked drivel and logical fallacies found all over the web... well I guess that's your prerogative.
@Caedyron Well, i dont care about your opinion, human nature is easy to understand, you only believe in evolution because you dont know who God is, so you look for the alternative, for something to believe in as it is in the nature of man to believe in something, as a result, you believed in a lie. I am of the opinion that you are spiritually foolish, an opinion backed by the fact that you have no ideawho or what God is, you just dont know and you need to know God to know your true essence!
I'll concede that "you are spiritually foolish" is indeed an opinion.
However, this opinion is not backed by your assumption that I have "no idea who (...) god is", because first you would have to establish that there are, in fact, (there's that word again) gods at all. Thus, your opinion is unfounded. From my viewpoint you are the spiritually foolish one.
There are no facts about gods, except the fact that there is no proof for one.
@ACioDC Well, as a result of years of research, we have developed Intelligent Design, this theory explains the complexity of life, living things and living anatomy. Evolution is not based on years of research, its just an assumption developed by a common naturalist some 150 years ago, who had little or no scientific equipment to enable him in his research. Believing in his theory makes you a darwanian, not a believer in science, science and darwinism are two different things.
@ACioDC Why should i ramble on a religious video? I am not religious and I am also a believer in science, it has been of great benefit to humankind in terms of science, technology etc. now i think you are confusing evolution with science, science is not evolution and evolution is not science.So you are the one not making sense here.
@ACioDC I do not defend any "religious beliefs", I am not a religious person, I am a Christian, my faith is based on my relationship with God our father who art in heaven. God dwells in heaven not in Europe so whatever happened in Europe is irrelevant to me. Dark age?? The dark age is now!! People are so blinded from the truth, humans believing that they are animals and people seriously believing that whales once walked lol, this is the dark age, thanks to people like you blinded of the truth!
@ACioDC And dates back 3 million years? I thought humans emerged just thousands of years ago. And you dont know whether these fossils are actually 3 million years old, its a mere speculation, no one actually knows, not even the carbon dating process. It is very obvious that results from carbon dating cannot be taken for facts as it produces different dates when different parts of the same tested item is carbon dated. Its just machines, man made, not some magical stuff that goes back in time.
ironically some would look at his timeline as ..if I only live half a minute, I might as well make it worthwhile for myself.screw everything else.And from a logical perspective that makes some sense, but from a humanitarian point it's somewhat sociopathic...so is the self more or less important than the whole in the end?
The fates of self and community are intertwined. Without the self, community will fail. And vice versa. You would not be able to survive as 'self' only. So I feel that both from a logical, and from a humanitarian perspective, it would be advantageous to live for the society as a whole; however, without losing sight of our personal goals and ambitions.
No, YOU are not getting my point. I never attacked all science, i only spelled out that evolution was not scientific and that i do not believe in it. Evolution "tries" to explain what happened to life, and as a result, assumptions have been made and these assumptions are now taken by most as factual evidences for evolution.
@theaccousticaddict Science is not much more than drawing logical conclusions from data in order to answer questions. Through the methods of biochemistry, data has been obtained which logically implies evolution. Evolution explains why there are so many dog breeds and why bacteria become resistant to antibiotics. It is understandable that some people are unable to comprehend the effects of evolution over millions of years since that timescale is outside of human experience.
@Huapua Evolution does not explain why there are so many breeds and why bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, rather it tries to use these things as evidence for itself. "Evolution is true cos bacteria re resistance to antibiotics", well that is bollocks sir, it just means that they have a strong immune system.
Evolution does explain bacterial immunity and variety of dog breeds. Evidence is obtained when we look at the chemistry behind these processes and see that the DNA of these organisms are changing. Your immune system strengthens because the cells responsible for that immunity evolve - their DNA changes and natural selection results in these "immunity" genes being passed on. Artifical selection also causes directional DNA change over time and is the basis behind dog breeding.
@Huapua Evolution does not explain bacterial immunity and variety of dog breeds, rather it uses these as evidence for its theory. We dont see that DNA keeps changing, immunity does not evolve. I dont know where you got these stories from. There's nothing like Artificial selection, such things never happened, selection can only be carried out by an intelligent source that knows how to select. There's no evidence for evolution.
Evolution is a theory which is obtained from rational interpretation of the data; theories have predictive power. When we observe a bacterial population, we notice certain things. We find that bacteria differ slightly in their DNA due to mutation. A bacterium may differ in its ability to resist antibiotics due to its unique DNA. An immune bacterium that does not die passes on its genes and its "children" are also immune (natural selection) resulting in an immune population.
@Huapua There's no data that supports evolution, fossils dont support evolution, they are not transitional, they are just dead bones of long dead animals. DNA is not proof for evolution, rather it suggests intelligent design. Bacteria do not support evolution, having a stronger immune system is no proof for evolution, as i said, my sister caught hay fever, passed it to my mum and then to my other sister, but i never caught it cos i have a stronger immune system.That does not mean am more evolved
@theaccousticaddict There is a lot of data that supports evolution, including fossils. >99% of all species ever existed are now extinct. You choose to ignore it and denigrate science since you have been convinced of a magical answer that is self-refuting and consistently contradicts scientific theory. The theory of evolution does NOT have anything to do with intelligent design. It does however contradict christian theology which is more interested in collecting a tithe than reality.
@Huapua Fossils do not support evolution, saying that over and over again does not make it true. Am not denigrating science, am denigrating evolution. I believe in science but not in evolution, there's a difference between the two, if you dont know that, then research it. True science does not contradict christian theology, only pseudo science does, and evolution is pseudo science. Fossils are not transitional, they are remains of dead animals, pure bones and nothing more.
@theaccousticaddict Religion is our first and worst excuse. Evolution is a fact. It DOES happen, there is no way around it, it has been observed and documented. Evolution has been correct for the past 1 hundred and 50 years, and is universally accepted by Scientists. So you basically don't accept Science, if you only believe Science when it benefits you. Science doesn't work that way.
@Ostrasize Yes you are right, religion is our worst excuse, i keep praying that God should get rid of all religions as they only cause harm to humankind. But evolution is not fact and saying it is does not make it fact, its just a hypothetical theory, which has been misinterpreted over the years by the likes of you as fact. Universally accepted by scientists? lol, and your point is? I accept science, i just dont accept the "fish to man" theory, its not feasible and not scientific .
@theaccousticaddict As an public service, a list of some "missing link" (transitional) fossils for your perusal. (source: NatGeo Daily News -- search it) (1) Tiktaalik: The "Fishapod", (2) Archaeopteryx: The First Bird, (3) Amphistium: The Halfway Flatfish, (4) Ambulocetus: The Walking Whale, (5) Homo Ergaster: The "Turkana Boy" Species, (6) Hyracotherium/Eohippus: The Dawn Horse, (7) Thrinaxodon: The Emerging Mammal. Now claim again there's no evidence for evolution.
As a sidenote, since when does YouTube's comment system suck even more than usual? You can't even put whitespaces in, say, a list, anymore these days? Fucking annoying.
@Caedyron That is the biggest load of crap i have ever read. The walking whale, where did you learn such stupid stuff from? There is nothing like a walking whale, there never was and never will be, stop confusing your imagination with reality. Whales where created to be in the waters just as birds where created for the air and man for the land. Easy as A,B,C. All those stupid claims of whales walking are just lame and irrational, we have never seen such things to testify for it, its all bogus.
@Huapua My sister had hay fever, she passed it on to my other sister and later my mum caught it, but it never got to me, is it cos am resistant to hay fever? no ,its bcos i have a stronger immune system that even when i lived, ate and spent much time with people who had this communicable infection, i was not infected. That is no evidence whatsoever for evolution, so get your facts right. Dog breeding is no evidence also for evolution, the end result is still a dog! Am unable to comprehend lies!
You offered a story about your immune system and then try to make it sound that this is the evidence I gave you for evolution. I think you may be confused about what the theory of evolution actually says. DNA is the "instructions" for life. If we modify the genes of early fly cells (for example) we can cause the fly to form legs on its head. Genes change naturally over time and is subject to natural selection; accumulated change over long periods results in new species.
Yes, the language of science is understood by al societies, but evolution isnt. Evolution is not scientific, but rather its franchised under science and people have now gone to believe that its scientific when its not.
No, am not saying that all scientists and technicians and anyone with a science based education is an evolutionist. Stop pushing words into my mouth, evolution and science are two different things, that's why we have scientists which are those who study science and evolutionists who are those who study and believe in evolution.
The fact that there's any mechanism to "unlock" in the first place credits complexity and design. Ancient civilisations cured themselves thanks to nature, so its not as if we cant find a cure to illnesses without trying to find out why humans age. I respect anyone who dedicates his life to helping others, but we are talking of evolution here and it has nothing to do with "helping the sick" or whatever. Medicine is based on scientific method, evolution isnt.
The study of life and nature gives evidence to the fact that life is complex and intelligently designed, i mean, the life cells, the anatomy of living organisms and even the complex and coded nature of the DNA that is one of the main components of living organisms. Thanks to the scientific theory of Intelligent design we are able to learn about these complexities. Evolution claims that intelligence came from nowhere, that organisms evolved and somehow got intelligence, that's stupid
Scientific knowledge may be passed, but evolution is not scientific, its just a theory for the mentally retarded cos no human being, with a sane mind, and intelligent would believe that he came from a fish. The idea that man evolved from a fish did not originate from "thousands of years of analysing, observing and studying nature", it is an assumption, evolution according to you guys occurred "millions of years ago", and you cant study, observe and analyse things that are past.
@theaccousticaddict From reading your previous comments, you deserve this, you're a fucking dumb ass. No one ever said we were fish, only that we evolved from them. "Such situations like this goes to show the level of brainwashing there is in this world". You're probably a Christian, who believes in made up things, backed by no evidence. Your belief is based off of a 2000 year old fairy-tale that has talking snakes. There are transitional fossils, evolution has been observed, hundreds of times.
What has forensic evidence have to do with anything? Yes you have the fossils, but you are interpreting it wrongly. First of all, its totally untrue that you can tell the age of a fossil or what it was was evolving to or where it was evolving from, all these claims can only be made only if these things are seen. If they arent, then they are nothing more than presumptions.
@theaccousticaddict also darwin isnt the first buddy. Aristotle...you know the philosopher....classified all living organisms to come from lesser ones...Great Chain of Being. Darwin is known for natural selection....known for making the observations and doing work and finding evidence for evolution. The idea of evolution has been around since the ancient greek, not since darwin.
Darwin formulated evolution, how? by "observing" the diversified nature of living organisms, he somehow came up with the stupid presumption that "millions of years ago", they evolved from a common ancestor. And after many years, you guys have capitalised on that and branded it as "science", yeah right, science indeed!! I don't care what anyone said, the fact is that organisms dont come from lesser ones, they only come from their own kind, that's what we,ve observed from nature.
The idea for evolution began at the time Darwin began his stupid observations that led him into formulating the must brainwashing theories ever. How these people have succeeded to convince you guys to believe that you are fishes baffles me. Such situations like this goes to show the level of brainwashing there is in this world. To convince grown, intelligent and logical individuals into believing they are fishes is not an easy task, all i can do is pray for you deceived souls.
lol, textbooks are written by men like us, with diverse ideas and opinions, most of which are wrong, so dont make it look as if these books fall from heaven or that they are absolute truths with no faults in them. Textbooks are mostly an idea or opinion of the writer. Example, the origin of species is nothing more than a Darwinian assumption of how life came to be, its not the truth, but its his own opinion and he's wrong. So textbooks cant tell us any truth about who we really are
@theaccousticaddict "textbooks are mostly an idea or opinion of the writer".....first off i would bet my life you havent read one page in the origin of species. it has nothing to do with opinions or assumptions.....thats like saying history books are just an opinion of the author... are you saying every single scientist to ever walk the earth just had an opinion and nothing more? You are a fucking idiot, read a book or kill yourself now, u dont deserve the blood in your veins.
Oho you are wrong, i deserve the blood in my veins, why? cos i know who gave it to me, i know who, through his intelligent input, made the human body whole and living. If there's anyone who does not deserve the blood in their veins, its you. You are living the life given to you by God, that which no man can give, yet you refuse to acknowledge him for who he is or what he has done. You believe you are a fish, you are the idiot here sir, you dont even know the life you are living.
It indicates that homo sapiens have inhabited the earth for millions of years and that life in earth descends from a common ancestor? ok, the question is, HOW?? It sounds as if this thing went back in time and witnessed these events, either that that whole tale you told me was conjured up, pure presumptions and nothing more. Either this dting means went back in time to witness these, or these things were made up, which between the two. Seeing is believing.
Tell me, what is this "evidence" found in fossils? So you truth is based on what "14 dating" comes up with? So this thing has the answers to anything and can tell the date of whatever it is> listen, this things are developed by men, and men cant provide such answers, this things develops answers using presumptive methods, i have seen cases where multiple dates have been given for one thing by the carbon and radioactive dating processes, they are presumptive, not valid factual dates
Facts are not gotten from textbooks, they are gotten from the observation of the matter in question, i though science was the study of the natural world? Why does anyone have to believe anything cos the textbooks said so. "Biology textbooks support the claim that all living things evolved and it is even taught in schools", so what?? that does not mean its the truth. No one has seen a fish evolve into a frog or one other specie to another, its all in ur textbooks, not factual.
@theaccousticaddict "Biology textbooks support the claim that all living things evolved and it is even taught in schools. so what?? that does not mean its the truth."
Read and compare:
"Religious books (ie. the Bible) support the claim that all living things were created and it is even taught in schools (unfortunately). So what?? that does not mean its the truth."
--
Facts are gotten from the observation of the matter in question; yes. And then those findings are written down. In a textbook.
@Caedyron Let's stop beating around the bush here. I dont believe in things just cos its written in the "biology books", it does not change the fact that what's in there is not another man's ideas and presumptions. I am a living being, so therefore i must have come from a living source, i am an intelligent being, so therefore i must have come from an intelligence source, that is logic. Evolution fails when it is presented with such facts as these, that is why i dont believe it.
Why don't you use those critical faculties of yours on the things written in the bible?
You don't "believe in things just cos its written in the 'biology books'". Then why, in contrast, do you "believe in things just cos its written in" the Bible?
((And for the grammar nazis around here, how, without resorting to shouting, can I denote the emphasis on the word 'do' in "why, in contrast, do" right above here?))
@Caedyron Because the bible is the word of God and the biology books are words of carnal men which is mostly hypothetical and of a presumptious nature, you cannot compare biology textbooks with the word of God. Its like comparing a bycicle to a bulldozer.
I dont care about what the scientific community believes in or not, i care about what the truth is. Man can never ever have a fish for an ancestor and i dont believe in such lies whether or not it is believed in any community, that am not interested in. Truth is not determined by who it is accepted by. I dont buy Darwin's theories, he was never there to witness the origin of anything, he just "observed" and managed to tell its origin, that is an assumption and i dont do assumptions.
I too do believe in science and the scientific method, but believing that you are a fish is not scientific, its retardation. Believing that intelligence came from none intelligence or that life came from a non living source is not only pseudo science, but also illogical. I buy science, i just dont buy evolution, and anyone who thinks that he has to believe in evolution to believe in science is only deceiving himself.
Explaining why we get old?? re you serious? people grow old, its part of nature, even animals do.So what's there to explain. Am not making fun of no one, am just saying that i dont buy the stupid theory of man evolving from a fish even if its being told by the pope, Obama, The Queen of England or any scientists/evolutionist. Truth is truth, and i for one wont allow anyone influence my belief in the truth just cos of his/her position.
No sir, the foetus does not "evolve", it grows, it develops, it matures, it does not evolve. That also does not change the fact that the foetus comes from a living source which is prove to the fact that for life to exist, it has to come from a living source.
the foetus has something resembling fish gills?? are you taking the piss now?? THOSE ARE BODY PARTS GROWING, NOT "FISH GILLS"!! GROW UP!!
The foetus is no proof for evolution, evolution takes millions of years, pregnancy doesnt
@ACspainDC hold on, so you are basing your claim that life originate from the mixture of chemicals on mere similarities. You cant expect anyone to believe that life originated from the mixture of chemicals just cos fragments of DNA are similar between living organisms, that sir is a presumption, you re presuming that life originated that way, its not fact cos you never saw it happen.
@ACspainDC oh yes, your father is a biochemist so therefore he went back in time, saw and observed how life originated, knew for sure how life originated, and then came back from time and told you. If you think life originate from the mixture of chemicals, then tell your father to mix those chemicals again to create life, if he can, the bravo! but if he cant, then you are wrong whether your father is a biochemist or not.
So are you trying to imply that there's no way life could have originated without the application of natural selection and the process of evolution that took millions of years? Why are you so certain that life evolved or that all living things evolved from a common ancestor? I don't see that being a possibility as all living things are very different and the fact that we all have DNA is a sure fact that a frog cant evolve into a man neither can a fish evolve into a frog.
@theaccousticaddict All living things are very different indeed, evolution happens in populations, over a very long period of time. Naturally things change a decent amount, you're not proving anything. You have a basic grasp of what you're even talking about. You haven't brought up one valid point other than saying Evolution isn't true. (It's a Scientific Theory based on facts).
@Ostrasize All living things are not just different, but very complex with very complex anatomy and coded DNA. Such complexity of which is beyond the intelligence and creative capability of any human being on the face of the earth. Now if you want to believe that all these came to be by magic, without no intelligent input from any intelligent source, that is your own problem, just know that its not the truth, and you only believe it cos you dont want to believe God's truth, its pretty obvious.
If life originated from a complex mixture of organic molecules, scientists would have been able to recreate and mix these particles in the lab to create life, they have tried, and have failed, they even tried to create life from particles gotten from a life cell and failed, that destroys the idea that life originated from " complex mixture of organic molecules" or whatever you guys make up as an alternative means of explaining God's wonderful works.
How can i give you "more information" when you cant even use your common sense to debunk the logic that intelligence can only originate from intelligence and that life can only come from a living source and not the other way round? Were we not all born from a living source? what use is "information" to you even you cant even understand the basics?
How do you know that life originated from a mixture of organic molecules? that is just your own wrong presumption idea.
@ACspainDC isn't it weird how in the old testament God is very destructive but in the new testament, God is extremely loving and merciful? well i guess he is merciful in both but why do you think he seemed more cruel in the old testament?
I am going to rephrase this: " Something Intelligent can only originate from an intelligent source who through intelligent input brought into existence this intelligent something or being. Emotions, sense of right and wrong, can only be given by something or someone who has it. It does not just appear from nowhere"
Do you agree and disagree, let's forget about your theories about "faith" and whatnot, just answer the simple logical question!!!
@theaccousticaddict we will never know EVER, it could be true or it cant, we have no science to prove its wrong, we have no science to prove that its right.
1. "god dun it" has always proven to be the wrong answer. Lightening, disease, plague, famine, weather of any kind etc etc etc - nothing whatsoever to do with god.
I suggest you live a full life, & do your best to change the world for the better so that you live on in the memories of people who love you. Look at Carl Sagan - dead 15 yrs, and still revered by 10 000s people around the world.
God is the creator of the universe as well as life and all species, not evolution, not natural selection, not random mutation, not any of these, but only through God did all things meaningful, logical, intelligent, musical, comedy, dance, poetry, etc. It all came from him. Anyone who says that all these things just "evolved" from nowhere is not only irrational, but also highly deluded and biased to the fact and truth of the creator of the universe.
My evidence for these claims is the logic that intelligence cannot originate from an unintelligent source and that life cannot originate from a none living source. Anyone with common sense can figure that out. If by that logic you still do not find evidence for my claims, then there's nothing i can do for you.
@petestrat07 And your evidence for the claim that evolution created intelligence, life, comedy, music, conscience, sense of right and wrong, ability to see, eat, taste, walk, talk, creativity, logic, understanding is..?
Are all of these not possessed by men or are they just "products of chemical mixture and reaction" as you guys claim? And if you say they evolved, i really wanna know where al these fine attributes evolved from. Hopefully it will be from a source that possesses these qualities!
@theaccousticaddict- if youre assuming that the source/creator possesses all of these qualities then you must assume the source shares our many negative traits as well.
Be mindfull of calling individuals "you guys" as personally, I have my own mind and theories as to what this life means. You've asked good questions so all I can do is encourage you to find your own answers and advise you to be careful not to attach yourself to any particular belief system.
@petestrat07 I am not assuming anything, I am asking you, politely, to tell me the source of all these attributes, you seem to disagree with my facts so maybe am wrong and you have the answer. God does not share our negative traits, he did not give us negative traits, the fall of man in Eden did. God is like a light, in itd absence there is absolute darkness, but those that are in him arent blinded by the darkness because the light shines around them.
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
@theaccousticaddict Famine, Disease , and natural disasters all come from your god too eh? He seems like a real fuck up, killing 99.9 percent of species, leaving us with a planet than is 60% salt water, and mainly uninhabitable.
@raeofsunshineyness It's quite obvious you don't have a clue what a scientific theory is when you say "it's just a theory". Gravity is a theory too. And the germ theory of disease. What you call a theory has another term in science: a hypothesis. The big bang theory is not an hypothesis. Theories explain facts. A theory is the highest science can achieve. A theory is the conclusion, not the premise.
They're neat videos, but I just don't go with evolution. I won't get into specifics, but I would greatly like to have a big, fluffy tail that evolution says I should be able to get if I'm a selected random specimen. That's just me.
i am not sure whether to belive in god or not that is because the bible says absolutly nothing about the universe if god really created everything then why would he talk only about one of the tinyest creations(humans)
@NAGULNR2 Well the bible has gone through one too many prints for anything to be validated as actual history. Especially when the manner of writing in ancient times was poetic and embellished in its interpretation. However the validity of the bible shouldn't be used to prove or disavow the existence of god. BTW other scriptures from other religions speak of other beings like the Nephilim or Anunnaki and not just human.
It's people like Carl Sagan that make me proud of our species.
If only many more people viewed life in a similar way we would be light years ahead in terms of technology and understanding of the universe in which we live.
It really is a small minority that have become the pioneers of our race but that has always been the case I suppose.
It would be good if oneday our species could remove their superstitious blindfolds with relief, unite as a race and discover our full potentual .
There are many talented, free thinking, intelligent and open minded people around the world. But they die off while trapped in some crappy 9-to-5 toil.
@Indrius What do you think how many people have no chance for education because they live in a poor country. Or they have nothing to eat and they die of hunger. Maybe millions of revolutionary new ideas for a better world could be created from these people.
@IQ20000Berta Yes. It is my belief that any person can find his niche in life and be intelligent, progressive and contributing, if given the chance. But the realities of scarcity based economy forces most of the people to pursue careers that are meaningless. Either that, or as you pointed out, live in poverty. Very few and only the luckiest are able to lead creative life and still survive. Think how much potential is lost.
@petestrat07, I know pestestra07, if there is one thing I know it is we would be far better off without faith and religion. The social dogma around it is fading. If we can make the next 50 year hump we might be okay. Personally I don't even want to bring any children into this world because it is simply, illogical.
Carl Sagan and many of Thunderf00t and FreeThinker's stuff gives me goosebumps. It feels so awesome to get that feeling over the gain of real knowledge! :)
@petestrat07 It isn't a superstitious method of belief that hampers our species from progressing. Our governments and our way of life and an inability to change said life is more the reason than religion. With the money spent for this "War on Terrorism" did you know we could have sent every senior student in the united states to a 4 year college? Religion is never going to die so I'd bet all my chips on education than wishful thinking.
By understanding where we came from, how we got here and what is our place in the universe, we are able to see things in true perspective (e.g. how global disputes seem so trivial) and how we can do so much together to make things better.
I remember seeing this on TV when I was a child. Show this to every crationist jerk awaiting the apocalypse so that some may understand that they are the problem.
@grebrim Someone did show it to a Creationist jerk, their response was to votebot it with one star ratings.
Creationists will not accept any facts that conflict with a literal reading of the Old Testament. Even if those facts are backed-up by years of observation and experiment, in multiple disciplines of science.
really informative and interesting
shoppittsburghnow 3 weeks ago
some sweet info here
ericajjful 3 weeks ago
This is a great video
chrispikeyp 3 weeks ago
Time or in Hellenic Κρόνος .The god thats eating his children or in other words Life is to short.time time time time time time. more time time. i nead more time .your time my time everybodys time.One of the ultimate gods Κρόνος Cronus(Latin: Saturnus ), a Titan, the father of Zeus, Poseidon, Hades, Hestia, Demeter, Hera, and Chiron
R3dro0st3R 1 month ago
i enjoyed this vid
staranjela 1 month ago
hehe ada-ada aja si glen.. Thanks
Flusercom 1 month ago
Good video!! Thanks for shared, Very Infomative.
Spasatcom 1 month ago
Check my channel too
ickieestes12r 2 months ago
@ACspainDC What a load of crap. Then how come scientists have been unable to create life? If it has been "duplicated in the lab" (which supports creation as the lab is a controlled environment where things occur as a result of the application of intelligence from an intelligent source which is the experimenters) then why have scientists failed to created life after trying for hundreds of years? except life is far more complex than just a mixture of "organic molecules".
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@AC by "a background in natural sciences" you mean....?You are technically implying that evolution is natural sciences and that i must believe in it to be deemed knowledgable of science.You are wrong, evolution is not natural science, natural science deals with life and the complexity of all living anatom, which is carefully explained by the theory of Intelligent Design, evolution is just a Darwanian theory suggesting that a fish magically turned to man, that is not "natural science", its bull.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC Nope, wrong. I just enjoy watching educative videos, especially on youTube because i also have my videos on here. So am not a troll at all. And it just ticks me off when i come across comments of people who are totally ignorant of what they are talking about.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC The title decieved me, i thought it was an educative video on the history of the universe. when i realised it was a load of crap, i was kinda pissed.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC listen, evolution is not a scientific concept, its a darwanian concept developed by Darwin about 150 years ago. Maybe the man was hallucinating when he developed the theory that man evolved from fishes cos he had no basis to support that fact and only a moron would claim or believe that man was once a fish.
So, stop confusing your moronic darwanian concepts with real scientific concepts. Science does not claim that humans are fishes, it was Darwin that did. Darwinism is not science.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
You really have no understanding of evolution if you keep repeating that it claims we were 'once a fish'.
Also, Darwin may have been the first to posit the (scientific) theory of evolution through natural selection, but he was by no means the last. Then there's the fact that Darwin was a scientist, and he came to his conclusions using the scientific method, meaning his concept are scientific instead of (or as well as) 'darwanian'. (??)
Caedyron 4 months ago 6
@Caedyron Well, according to evolution, the first life form (single celled organism) evolved into a fish doesn't it? And then the fish magically developed legs, came on land and all that crap. Darwin was not a scientist, he was a naturalist, there is a difference, he had no qualification needed today to be considered a true scientist. He did not come to conclusions using the scientific method, according to him, he "observed", and that is done by looking, wat conclusions can you get from that??.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict "...according to evolution, the first life form (...) evolved into a fish..."
No, that is not what evolution claims. I suggest you do research first, then comment.
Where else do you get your conclusions from, if not from looking/observing?
Scientific method:
"a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic OBSERVATION, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
Caedyron 4 months ago 6
@Caedyron I think you should study your false theory more. That is exaclty what evolution claims. A fish over millions of years developed a leg and stepped on land. That is what all evolutionists claim, so if you disagree, then you have no idea what evolution is.
how can you tell that living organisms evolved over millions of years ago just by observing it? That is totally impossible. you can tell how organisms function by observing, but you cant tell whether they evolved over millions of years
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@Caedyron Modification of hypothesis?? Sounds to me like the construction and and refining of lies in order for people to believe it as truth. A hypothesis is not the truth, and modifying a hypothesis is trying to advertise something which is not truth so that people will buy it.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC "We went through a long process of evolution" and how do you know that? I have not seen any process of evolution in humans, its not as if we had wings before and now we dont, or that we had 3 legs before and now we dont. Humans have always been humans just as all animals still remain the same, having evolved from the same common ancestor of their kind. Nature is easy to understand, the evolutionists is confusing the minds of the ignorance once by feeding them lies.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC Evolution excludes and contradict all posibilities of any sort of intelligent source having any intelligent input to the existence of living organisms and the complexity of its anatomy. No evolutionist would tell you that there's a chance that life came from a living or intelligence source, they will claim that millions of years ago, certain chemicals came together to form life, that life got complex by natural selection. Its just like saying "nature created nature" it doesnt make sense.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC I believe that life can only come from a living source and that intelligence can only come from an intelligent source. Do you agree or disagree? The choice you make will determine your level of understanding of the life you are living as well as all living things. Evolution is just a theory developed so that none chiristans can have an alternative explanation to God's creation without including God. Carl Sagan may have been a brillian astronomer, but he wasn't all knowing.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
It is not a question of us disagreeing or agreeing. Soon as something is considered fact, our personal interpretation of the issue is irrelevant. It is a fact that evolution is true. You can come up with any number of reasons why you THINK it is not, but unless you come up with evidence which disproves it, it remains your (unfounded) opinion.
Myself, I am of the opinion that you are ignorant. An opinion backed by the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.
Caedyron 4 months ago 9
@Caedyron "It is fact that evolution is true" no its not, its no fact, just a hypothetical theory developed by Darwin some 150 years ago, just because you have capitalised on it over the years does not make it fact. From the moment of creation, living organisms have always reproduced after their own kind thanks to DNA and gene, so the false claim that a fish developed legs is total BS because it is not in their gene or DNA to grow legs, just fins, and it has always remained fins.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@Caedyron "It is fact that evolution is true" no its not, its no fact, just a hypothetical theory developed by Darwin some 150 years ago, just because you have capitalised on it over the years does not make it fact. From the moment of creation, living organisms have always reproduced after their own kind thanks to DNA and gene, so the false claim that a fish developed legs is total BS because it is not in their gene or DNA to grow legs, just fins, and it has always remained fins.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
I'm not going to debate with you about whether it is a fact. It is. Thing is, it's also a theory. But not in the way you use the words. "Scientific Theory". Again, I suggest you look up what they actually mean. There are lots of dictionaries a single google away. If you don't know enough to research the topic and instead keep regurgitating the same debunked drivel and logical fallacies found all over the web... well I guess that's your prerogative.
Caedyron 4 months ago 10
@Caedyron Well, i dont care about your opinion, human nature is easy to understand, you only believe in evolution because you dont know who God is, so you look for the alternative, for something to believe in as it is in the nature of man to believe in something, as a result, you believed in a lie. I am of the opinion that you are spiritually foolish, an opinion backed by the fact that you have no ideawho or what God is, you just dont know and you need to know God to know your true essence!
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
Comment removed
Caedyron 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
*rolls eyes*
Here we go.
I'll concede that "you are spiritually foolish" is indeed an opinion.
However, this opinion is not backed by your assumption that I have "no idea who (...) god is", because first you would have to establish that there are, in fact, (there's that word again) gods at all. Thus, your opinion is unfounded. From my viewpoint you are the spiritually foolish one.
There are no facts about gods, except the fact that there is no proof for one.
Caedyron 4 months ago 4
@ACioDC Well, as a result of years of research, we have developed Intelligent Design, this theory explains the complexity of life, living things and living anatomy. Evolution is not based on years of research, its just an assumption developed by a common naturalist some 150 years ago, who had little or no scientific equipment to enable him in his research. Believing in his theory makes you a darwanian, not a believer in science, science and darwinism are two different things.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
Do you even know what kind of bullshit you're spouting, or do you just open your mouth and wonder at the gibberish that flows free?
Caedyron 4 months ago 6
@ACioDC Why should i ramble on a religious video? I am not religious and I am also a believer in science, it has been of great benefit to humankind in terms of science, technology etc. now i think you are confusing evolution with science, science is not evolution and evolution is not science.So you are the one not making sense here.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@ACioDC I do not defend any "religious beliefs", I am not a religious person, I am a Christian, my faith is based on my relationship with God our father who art in heaven. God dwells in heaven not in Europe so whatever happened in Europe is irrelevant to me. Dark age?? The dark age is now!! People are so blinded from the truth, humans believing that they are animals and people seriously believing that whales once walked lol, this is the dark age, thanks to people like you blinded of the truth!
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
@ACioDC And dates back 3 million years? I thought humans emerged just thousands of years ago. And you dont know whether these fossils are actually 3 million years old, its a mere speculation, no one actually knows, not even the carbon dating process. It is very obvious that results from carbon dating cannot be taken for facts as it produces different dates when different parts of the same tested item is carbon dated. Its just machines, man made, not some magical stuff that goes back in time.
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
ironically some would look at his timeline as ..if I only live half a minute, I might as well make it worthwhile for myself.screw everything else.And from a logical perspective that makes some sense, but from a humanitarian point it's somewhat sociopathic...so is the self more or less important than the whole in the end?
nightkraawler 5 months ago
@nightkraawler
The fates of self and community are intertwined. Without the self, community will fail. And vice versa. You would not be able to survive as 'self' only. So I feel that both from a logical, and from a humanitarian perspective, it would be advantageous to live for the society as a whole; however, without losing sight of our personal goals and ambitions.
Caedyron 4 months ago 2
Carl Sagan, I love you
3200manpro 7 months ago 6
How could so many dislike this video? Bewildering.
Pichounator 7 months ago 7
@ACspainDC
No, YOU are not getting my point. I never attacked all science, i only spelled out that evolution was not scientific and that i do not believe in it. Evolution "tries" to explain what happened to life, and as a result, assumptions have been made and these assumptions are now taken by most as factual evidences for evolution.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict Science is not much more than drawing logical conclusions from data in order to answer questions. Through the methods of biochemistry, data has been obtained which logically implies evolution. Evolution explains why there are so many dog breeds and why bacteria become resistant to antibiotics. It is understandable that some people are unable to comprehend the effects of evolution over millions of years since that timescale is outside of human experience.
Huapua 8 months ago 8
@Huapua Evolution does not explain why there are so many breeds and why bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, rather it tries to use these things as evidence for itself. "Evolution is true cos bacteria re resistance to antibiotics", well that is bollocks sir, it just means that they have a strong immune system.
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
Evolution does explain bacterial immunity and variety of dog breeds. Evidence is obtained when we look at the chemistry behind these processes and see that the DNA of these organisms are changing. Your immune system strengthens because the cells responsible for that immunity evolve - their DNA changes and natural selection results in these "immunity" genes being passed on. Artifical selection also causes directional DNA change over time and is the basis behind dog breeding.
Huapua 8 months ago 10
@Huapua Evolution does not explain bacterial immunity and variety of dog breeds, rather it uses these as evidence for its theory. We dont see that DNA keeps changing, immunity does not evolve. I dont know where you got these stories from. There's nothing like Artificial selection, such things never happened, selection can only be carried out by an intelligent source that knows how to select. There's no evidence for evolution.
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
Evolution is a theory which is obtained from rational interpretation of the data; theories have predictive power. When we observe a bacterial population, we notice certain things. We find that bacteria differ slightly in their DNA due to mutation. A bacterium may differ in its ability to resist antibiotics due to its unique DNA. An immune bacterium that does not die passes on its genes and its "children" are also immune (natural selection) resulting in an immune population.
Huapua 8 months ago 11
@Huapua There's no data that supports evolution, fossils dont support evolution, they are not transitional, they are just dead bones of long dead animals. DNA is not proof for evolution, rather it suggests intelligent design. Bacteria do not support evolution, having a stronger immune system is no proof for evolution, as i said, my sister caught hay fever, passed it to my mum and then to my other sister, but i never caught it cos i have a stronger immune system.That does not mean am more evolved
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@theaccousticaddict There is a lot of data that supports evolution, including fossils. >99% of all species ever existed are now extinct. You choose to ignore it and denigrate science since you have been convinced of a magical answer that is self-refuting and consistently contradicts scientific theory. The theory of evolution does NOT have anything to do with intelligent design. It does however contradict christian theology which is more interested in collecting a tithe than reality.
Huapua 8 months ago 14
@Huapua Fossils do not support evolution, saying that over and over again does not make it true. Am not denigrating science, am denigrating evolution. I believe in science but not in evolution, there's a difference between the two, if you dont know that, then research it. True science does not contradict christian theology, only pseudo science does, and evolution is pseudo science. Fossils are not transitional, they are remains of dead animals, pure bones and nothing more.
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@theaccousticaddict Religion is our first and worst excuse. Evolution is a fact. It DOES happen, there is no way around it, it has been observed and documented. Evolution has been correct for the past 1 hundred and 50 years, and is universally accepted by Scientists. So you basically don't accept Science, if you only believe Science when it benefits you. Science doesn't work that way.
Ostrasize 8 months ago 10
@Ostrasize Yes you are right, religion is our worst excuse, i keep praying that God should get rid of all religions as they only cause harm to humankind. But evolution is not fact and saying it is does not make it fact, its just a hypothetical theory, which has been misinterpreted over the years by the likes of you as fact. Universally accepted by scientists? lol, and your point is? I accept science, i just dont accept the "fish to man" theory, its not feasible and not scientific .
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
Comment removed
Caedyron 5 months ago
Comment removed
Caedyron 5 months ago
Caedyron 5 months ago 20
As a sidenote, since when does YouTube's comment system suck even more than usual? You can't even put whitespaces in, say, a list, anymore these days? Fucking annoying.
Caedyron 5 months ago
@Caedyron That is the biggest load of crap i have ever read. The walking whale, where did you learn such stupid stuff from? There is nothing like a walking whale, there never was and never will be, stop confusing your imagination with reality. Whales where created to be in the waters just as birds where created for the air and man for the land. Easy as A,B,C. All those stupid claims of whales walking are just lame and irrational, we have never seen such things to testify for it, its all bogus.
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
Apparently following directions (ie. search it) is too difficult for you. Not that I expected anything else.
You have fun in your contemptible little world.
Caedyron 4 months ago 12
Comment removed
Caedyron 4 months ago
@Huapua My sister had hay fever, she passed it on to my other sister and later my mum caught it, but it never got to me, is it cos am resistant to hay fever? no ,its bcos i have a stronger immune system that even when i lived, ate and spent much time with people who had this communicable infection, i was not infected. That is no evidence whatsoever for evolution, so get your facts right. Dog breeding is no evidence also for evolution, the end result is still a dog! Am unable to comprehend lies!
theaccousticaddict 8 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
You offered a story about your immune system and then try to make it sound that this is the evidence I gave you for evolution. I think you may be confused about what the theory of evolution actually says. DNA is the "instructions" for life. If we modify the genes of early fly cells (for example) we can cause the fly to form legs on its head. Genes change naturally over time and is subject to natural selection; accumulated change over long periods results in new species.
Huapua 8 months ago 11
@ACspainDC
Yes, the language of science is understood by al societies, but evolution isnt. Evolution is not scientific, but rather its franchised under science and people have now gone to believe that its scientific when its not.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
No, am not saying that all scientists and technicians and anyone with a science based education is an evolutionist. Stop pushing words into my mouth, evolution and science are two different things, that's why we have scientists which are those who study science and evolutionists who are those who study and believe in evolution.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
The fact that there's any mechanism to "unlock" in the first place credits complexity and design. Ancient civilisations cured themselves thanks to nature, so its not as if we cant find a cure to illnesses without trying to find out why humans age. I respect anyone who dedicates his life to helping others, but we are talking of evolution here and it has nothing to do with "helping the sick" or whatever. Medicine is based on scientific method, evolution isnt.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
Search "UFO Disclosure, Revelations & the 2012 Connection" ON
YOUTUBE This is a compilation of evidence revealed by former and present
American presidents, astronauts, military personnel, politicians along
with credible aired UFO footage. This compilation also contains planned
revelations regarding knowledge of life beyond Earth along with it's
current and ever ongoing presence which is being hidden from the public.
This has been hidden from the public for over 50 years. + MORE
Freedomloveandtruth 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
The study of life and nature gives evidence to the fact that life is complex and intelligently designed, i mean, the life cells, the anatomy of living organisms and even the complex and coded nature of the DNA that is one of the main components of living organisms. Thanks to the scientific theory of Intelligent design we are able to learn about these complexities. Evolution claims that intelligence came from nowhere, that organisms evolved and somehow got intelligence, that's stupid
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
Scientific knowledge may be passed, but evolution is not scientific, its just a theory for the mentally retarded cos no human being, with a sane mind, and intelligent would believe that he came from a fish. The idea that man evolved from a fish did not originate from "thousands of years of analysing, observing and studying nature", it is an assumption, evolution according to you guys occurred "millions of years ago", and you cant study, observe and analyse things that are past.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict From reading your previous comments, you deserve this, you're a fucking dumb ass. No one ever said we were fish, only that we evolved from them. "Such situations like this goes to show the level of brainwashing there is in this world". You're probably a Christian, who believes in made up things, backed by no evidence. Your belief is based off of a 2000 year old fairy-tale that has talking snakes. There are transitional fossils, evolution has been observed, hundreds of times.
Ostrasize 8 months ago 7
@ACspainDC
What has forensic evidence have to do with anything? Yes you have the fossils, but you are interpreting it wrongly. First of all, its totally untrue that you can tell the age of a fossil or what it was was evolving to or where it was evolving from, all these claims can only be made only if these things are seen. If they arent, then they are nothing more than presumptions.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict also darwin isnt the first buddy. Aristotle...you know the philosopher....classified all living organisms to come from lesser ones...Great Chain of Being. Darwin is known for natural selection....known for making the observations and doing work and finding evidence for evolution. The idea of evolution has been around since the ancient greek, not since darwin.
TripAyane 10 months ago 10
@TripAyane
Darwin formulated evolution, how? by "observing" the diversified nature of living organisms, he somehow came up with the stupid presumption that "millions of years ago", they evolved from a common ancestor. And after many years, you guys have capitalised on that and branded it as "science", yeah right, science indeed!! I don't care what anyone said, the fact is that organisms dont come from lesser ones, they only come from their own kind, that's what we,ve observed from nature.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@TripAyane
The idea for evolution began at the time Darwin began his stupid observations that led him into formulating the must brainwashing theories ever. How these people have succeeded to convince you guys to believe that you are fishes baffles me. Such situations like this goes to show the level of brainwashing there is in this world. To convince grown, intelligent and logical individuals into believing they are fishes is not an easy task, all i can do is pray for you deceived souls.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
lol, textbooks are written by men like us, with diverse ideas and opinions, most of which are wrong, so dont make it look as if these books fall from heaven or that they are absolute truths with no faults in them. Textbooks are mostly an idea or opinion of the writer. Example, the origin of species is nothing more than a Darwinian assumption of how life came to be, its not the truth, but its his own opinion and he's wrong. So textbooks cant tell us any truth about who we really are
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict "textbooks are mostly an idea or opinion of the writer".....first off i would bet my life you havent read one page in the origin of species. it has nothing to do with opinions or assumptions.....thats like saying history books are just an opinion of the author... are you saying every single scientist to ever walk the earth just had an opinion and nothing more? You are a fucking idiot, read a book or kill yourself now, u dont deserve the blood in your veins.
TripAyane 10 months ago 10
@TripAyane
Oho you are wrong, i deserve the blood in my veins, why? cos i know who gave it to me, i know who, through his intelligent input, made the human body whole and living. If there's anyone who does not deserve the blood in their veins, its you. You are living the life given to you by God, that which no man can give, yet you refuse to acknowledge him for who he is or what he has done. You believe you are a fish, you are the idiot here sir, you dont even know the life you are living.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
It indicates that homo sapiens have inhabited the earth for millions of years and that life in earth descends from a common ancestor? ok, the question is, HOW?? It sounds as if this thing went back in time and witnessed these events, either that that whole tale you told me was conjured up, pure presumptions and nothing more. Either this dting means went back in time to witness these, or these things were made up, which between the two. Seeing is believing.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
Tell me, what is this "evidence" found in fossils? So you truth is based on what "14 dating" comes up with? So this thing has the answers to anything and can tell the date of whatever it is> listen, this things are developed by men, and men cant provide such answers, this things develops answers using presumptive methods, i have seen cases where multiple dates have been given for one thing by the carbon and radioactive dating processes, they are presumptive, not valid factual dates
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
Facts are not gotten from textbooks, they are gotten from the observation of the matter in question, i though science was the study of the natural world? Why does anyone have to believe anything cos the textbooks said so. "Biology textbooks support the claim that all living things evolved and it is even taught in schools", so what?? that does not mean its the truth. No one has seen a fish evolve into a frog or one other specie to another, its all in ur textbooks, not factual.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict "Biology textbooks support the claim that all living things evolved and it is even taught in schools. so what?? that does not mean its the truth."
Read and compare:
"Religious books (ie. the Bible) support the claim that all living things were created and it is even taught in schools (unfortunately). So what?? that does not mean its the truth."
--
Facts are gotten from the observation of the matter in question; yes. And then those findings are written down. In a textbook.
Caedyron 4 months ago 17
@Caedyron Let's stop beating around the bush here. I dont believe in things just cos its written in the "biology books", it does not change the fact that what's in there is not another man's ideas and presumptions. I am a living being, so therefore i must have come from a living source, i am an intelligent being, so therefore i must have come from an intelligence source, that is logic. Evolution fails when it is presented with such facts as these, that is why i dont believe it.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
Why don't you use those critical faculties of yours on the things written in the bible?
You don't "believe in things just cos its written in the 'biology books'". Then why, in contrast, do you "believe in things just cos its written in" the Bible?
((And for the grammar nazis around here, how, without resorting to shouting, can I denote the emphasis on the word 'do' in "why, in contrast, do" right above here?))
Caedyron 4 months ago 6
@Caedyron Because the bible is the word of God and the biology books are words of carnal men which is mostly hypothetical and of a presumptious nature, you cannot compare biology textbooks with the word of God. Its like comparing a bycicle to a bulldozer.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict
And that, in a nutshell, is why religion is a blight on mankind.
Caedyron 4 months ago 4
@ACspainDC
I dont care about what the scientific community believes in or not, i care about what the truth is. Man can never ever have a fish for an ancestor and i dont believe in such lies whether or not it is believed in any community, that am not interested in. Truth is not determined by who it is accepted by. I dont buy Darwin's theories, he was never there to witness the origin of anything, he just "observed" and managed to tell its origin, that is an assumption and i dont do assumptions.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
I too do believe in science and the scientific method, but believing that you are a fish is not scientific, its retardation. Believing that intelligence came from none intelligence or that life came from a non living source is not only pseudo science, but also illogical. I buy science, i just dont buy evolution, and anyone who thinks that he has to believe in evolution to believe in science is only deceiving himself.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
Explaining why we get old?? re you serious? people grow old, its part of nature, even animals do.So what's there to explain. Am not making fun of no one, am just saying that i dont buy the stupid theory of man evolving from a fish even if its being told by the pope, Obama, The Queen of England or any scientists/evolutionist. Truth is truth, and i for one wont allow anyone influence my belief in the truth just cos of his/her position.
You cant prevent getting old, its part of nature
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
No sir, the foetus does not "evolve", it grows, it develops, it matures, it does not evolve. That also does not change the fact that the foetus comes from a living source which is prove to the fact that for life to exist, it has to come from a living source.
the foetus has something resembling fish gills?? are you taking the piss now?? THOSE ARE BODY PARTS GROWING, NOT "FISH GILLS"!! GROW UP!!
The foetus is no proof for evolution, evolution takes millions of years, pregnancy doesnt
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC hold on, so you are basing your claim that life originate from the mixture of chemicals on mere similarities. You cant expect anyone to believe that life originated from the mixture of chemicals just cos fragments of DNA are similar between living organisms, that sir is a presumption, you re presuming that life originated that way, its not fact cos you never saw it happen.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC oh yes, your father is a biochemist so therefore he went back in time, saw and observed how life originated, knew for sure how life originated, and then came back from time and told you. If you think life originate from the mixture of chemicals, then tell your father to mix those chemicals again to create life, if he can, the bravo! but if he cant, then you are wrong whether your father is a biochemist or not.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
So are you trying to imply that there's no way life could have originated without the application of natural selection and the process of evolution that took millions of years? Why are you so certain that life evolved or that all living things evolved from a common ancestor? I don't see that being a possibility as all living things are very different and the fact that we all have DNA is a sure fact that a frog cant evolve into a man neither can a fish evolve into a frog.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict All living things are very different indeed, evolution happens in populations, over a very long period of time. Naturally things change a decent amount, you're not proving anything. You have a basic grasp of what you're even talking about. You haven't brought up one valid point other than saying Evolution isn't true. (It's a Scientific Theory based on facts).
Ostrasize 8 months ago 8
@Ostrasize All living things are not just different, but very complex with very complex anatomy and coded DNA. Such complexity of which is beyond the intelligence and creative capability of any human being on the face of the earth. Now if you want to believe that all these came to be by magic, without no intelligent input from any intelligent source, that is your own problem, just know that its not the truth, and you only believe it cos you dont want to believe God's truth, its pretty obvious.
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
@Ostrasize And what facts is evolution based on??
theaccousticaddict 5 months ago
@ACspainDC
If life originated from a complex mixture of organic molecules, scientists would have been able to recreate and mix these particles in the lab to create life, they have tried, and have failed, they even tried to create life from particles gotten from a life cell and failed, that destroys the idea that life originated from " complex mixture of organic molecules" or whatever you guys make up as an alternative means of explaining God's wonderful works.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC
How can i give you "more information" when you cant even use your common sense to debunk the logic that intelligence can only originate from intelligence and that life can only come from a living source and not the other way round? Were we not all born from a living source? what use is "information" to you even you cant even understand the basics?
How do you know that life originated from a mixture of organic molecules? that is just your own wrong presumption idea.
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago
@ACspainDC isn't it weird how in the old testament God is very destructive but in the new testament, God is extremely loving and merciful? well i guess he is merciful in both but why do you think he seemed more cruel in the old testament?
scarydance3 11 months ago
@ACspainDC
I am going to rephrase this: " Something Intelligent can only originate from an intelligent source who through intelligent input brought into existence this intelligent something or being. Emotions, sense of right and wrong, can only be given by something or someone who has it. It does not just appear from nowhere"
Do you agree and disagree, let's forget about your theories about "faith" and whatnot, just answer the simple logical question!!!
theaccousticaddict 11 months ago
@theaccousticaddict we will never know EVER, it could be true or it cant, we have no science to prove its wrong, we have no science to prove that its right.
scarydance3 11 months ago
there is room for god, we have no idea what caused the big bang....right?
scarydance3 11 months ago
@scarydance3
Why resort to god? When has 'god' EVER been the correct answer to explain anything in the physical universe?
DMFmonster 11 months ago 20
@DMFmonster when isn't it the correct answer?
scarydance3 11 months ago
@scarydance3
1. "god dun it" has always proven to be the wrong answer. Lightening, disease, plague, famine, weather of any kind etc etc etc - nothing whatsoever to do with god.
DMFmonster 11 months ago 8
@DMFmonster if thats true then we are all doomed to seize to exist in the end :(
scarydance3 11 months ago
@scarydance3
I suggest you live a full life, & do your best to change the world for the better so that you live on in the memories of people who love you. Look at Carl Sagan - dead 15 yrs, and still revered by 10 000s people around the world.
DMFmonster 11 months ago 7
CHECK OUT "UFO Disclosure, Revelations & the 2012 Connection" ON
YOUTUBE This is a compilation of evidence revealed by former and present
astronauts, politicians, American presidents, military personnel, +
with aired UFO footage in the news . The compilation contains
revelations about knowledge of life beyond Earth along with the
current ongoing presence which has being hidden from the public for over 50
years + tons more.
Futurecop2012G 11 months ago
God is the creator of the universe as well as life and all species, not evolution, not natural selection, not random mutation, not any of these, but only through God did all things meaningful, logical, intelligent, musical, comedy, dance, poetry, etc. It all came from him. Anyone who says that all these things just "evolved" from nowhere is not only irrational, but also highly deluded and biased to the fact and truth of the creator of the universe.
theaccousticaddict 11 months ago
@theaccousticaddict And your evidence for these claims is where?
petestrat07 11 months ago 30
@petestrat07
My evidence for these claims is the logic that intelligence cannot originate from an unintelligent source and that life cannot originate from a none living source. Anyone with common sense can figure that out. If by that logic you still do not find evidence for my claims, then there's nothing i can do for you.
theaccousticaddict 11 months ago
@petestrat07 And your evidence for the claim that evolution created intelligence, life, comedy, music, conscience, sense of right and wrong, ability to see, eat, taste, walk, talk, creativity, logic, understanding is..?
Are all of these not possessed by men or are they just "products of chemical mixture and reaction" as you guys claim? And if you say they evolved, i really wanna know where al these fine attributes evolved from. Hopefully it will be from a source that possesses these qualities!
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
Comment removed
petestrat07 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict- if youre assuming that the source/creator possesses all of these qualities then you must assume the source shares our many negative traits as well.
Be mindfull of calling individuals "you guys" as personally, I have my own mind and theories as to what this life means. You've asked good questions so all I can do is encourage you to find your own answers and advise you to be careful not to attach yourself to any particular belief system.
petestrat07 4 months ago 6
@petestrat07 I am not assuming anything, I am asking you, politely, to tell me the source of all these attributes, you seem to disagree with my facts so maybe am wrong and you have the answer. God does not share our negative traits, he did not give us negative traits, the fall of man in Eden did. God is like a light, in itd absence there is absolute darkness, but those that are in him arent blinded by the darkness because the light shines around them.
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
@petestrat07 I said "you guys" because 99.9% of those commenting on this page about this topic share your same theories, that is why your comments get so many likes. I have already found the answers to my questions, but that answer somehow does not settle with you, so you re therefore seeking an alternate. I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system. Life is much more than you make of it sir, it is God's doing!!
theaccousticaddict 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@theaccousticaddict "I am not attached to a belief system, I am a christian who has a relationship with God, that is not being in a belief system."
I posit the theory that you are, in fact, 'attached to' a belief system. Here's my reasoning:
You are a christian in a relationship with god.
Hence, you must believe in a god.
Q.E.D.
Caedyron 4 months ago
@theaccousticaddict Famine, Disease , and natural disasters all come from your god too eh? He seems like a real fuck up, killing 99.9 percent of species, leaving us with a planet than is 60% salt water, and mainly uninhabitable.
Ostrasize 8 months ago 7
Makes me wanna buy his books
BlindingAnime 1 year ago 8
favored;
BAZHE 1 year ago 2
This man was truly an intellectual giant.
durdle1701 1 year ago 10
Comment removed
raeofsunshineyness 1 year ago
@raeofsunshineyness It's quite obvious you don't have a clue what a scientific theory is when you say "it's just a theory". Gravity is a theory too. And the germ theory of disease. What you call a theory has another term in science: a hypothesis. The big bang theory is not an hypothesis. Theories explain facts. A theory is the highest science can achieve. A theory is the conclusion, not the premise.
byteresistor 1 year ago 20
Comment removed
raeofsunshineyness 1 year ago
our spiritual awareness and technology are really distant.
malaverde13 1 year ago
and i still can't program my remote...
adrianeaglrck 1 year ago
His speeches and the lovely music fits so nice together, watching his series makes you wanna explore space!
Watchdawg 1 year ago
i want him to read me a bed time story while i sigh and dream of the stars
adrianeaglrck 1 year ago 4
30 years later, this is still an important science series.
marsbugs 1 year ago 13
They're neat videos, but I just don't go with evolution. I won't get into specifics, but I would greatly like to have a big, fluffy tail that evolution says I should be able to get if I'm a selected random specimen. That's just me.
OddFacade 1 year ago
The average person is so bombarded with "chewing gum for the eyes" today,
that it's hard to see how most people will ever aspire to be more than a Celebrity...
I wouldn't be able to afford University in the long run, but is that a fair enough reason for me to miss out?
The Wonder of the Universe should become our prime goal, and the Science behind it should be a shared heritage, common knowledge.
I think that's why Carl reached out to so many people...
TheNotoriousTOM 1 year ago 6
all creationist skip to 2:45
TooMuchToo0ften 1 year ago
I am a literal, 6-day, God rested on the 7th day, creationist.
Let the thumb-downs roll! I want to see how many negatives this comment can get :D
greyspot00 1 year ago
Whats the name of the song during this clip?
Its vangelis alright, but i dont regocnize the name
devilsmurf 1 year ago
There is no single word that properly sums up Carl Sagan.
Dt0x75 1 year ago 4
Now this is spirituality!
MrBlush11 1 year ago
@MrBlush11 very true it gives you an awesome feeling. Makes you feel insignificant and yet important.
Dt0x75 1 year ago
i am not sure whether to belive in god or not that is because the bible says absolutly nothing about the universe if god really created everything then why would he talk only about one of the tinyest creations(humans)
NAGULNR2 1 year ago
@NAGULNR2 Well the bible has gone through one too many prints for anything to be validated as actual history. Especially when the manner of writing in ancient times was poetic and embellished in its interpretation. However the validity of the bible shouldn't be used to prove or disavow the existence of god. BTW other scriptures from other religions speak of other beings like the Nephilim or Anunnaki and not just human.
Exodus511 1 year ago
we are insignificant and god does not exist
SignificantReality 1 year ago
@SignificantReality
We are incredibly significant and god most probably does not exist
RichieCarvaliho 1 year ago 5
@RichieCarvaliho How are we significant?
Gabumon54321 1 year ago
@Gabumon54321 I would say that we are significant, because we say we are significant.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@leeroynaggis..well you have a brain the size of a pea..
Samanthakins 2 years ago
I love this guy
akrulla 2 years ago 4
It's people like Carl Sagan that make me proud of our species.
If only many more people viewed life in a similar way we would be light years ahead in terms of technology and understanding of the universe in which we live.
It really is a small minority that have become the pioneers of our race but that has always been the case I suppose.
It would be good if oneday our species could remove their superstitious blindfolds with relief, unite as a race and discover our full potentual .
petestrat07 2 years ago 50
There are many talented, free thinking, intelligent and open minded people around the world. But they die off while trapped in some crappy 9-to-5 toil.
Indrius 2 years ago 5
@Indrius What do you think how many people have no chance for education because they live in a poor country. Or they have nothing to eat and they die of hunger. Maybe millions of revolutionary new ideas for a better world could be created from these people.
IQ20000Berta 1 year ago
@IQ20000Berta Yes. It is my belief that any person can find his niche in life and be intelligent, progressive and contributing, if given the chance. But the realities of scarcity based economy forces most of the people to pursue careers that are meaningless. Either that, or as you pointed out, live in poverty. Very few and only the luckiest are able to lead creative life and still survive. Think how much potential is lost.
Indrius 1 year ago
@petestrat07, I know pestestra07, if there is one thing I know it is we would be far better off without faith and religion. The social dogma around it is fading. If we can make the next 50 year hump we might be okay. Personally I don't even want to bring any children into this world because it is simply, illogical.
Carl Sagan and many of Thunderf00t and FreeThinker's stuff gives me goosebumps. It feels so awesome to get that feeling over the gain of real knowledge! :)
hoboboxerjoe 2 years ago
@petestrat07 It isn't a superstitious method of belief that hampers our species from progressing. Our governments and our way of life and an inability to change said life is more the reason than religion. With the money spent for this "War on Terrorism" did you know we could have sent every senior student in the united states to a 4 year college? Religion is never going to die so I'd bet all my chips on education than wishful thinking.
Exodus511 1 year ago 2
@petestrat07 agreed. now if only we could have people that didn't use light years as a measurement of time XD
mtyler5000 1 year ago
@petestrat07 wouldnt that be sacrificing faith for knowledge?
scarydance3 11 months ago
So what, Sagan.
It's all FUCKED
leeroynaggins 2 years ago
that is all fucked ???
Mugib 2 years ago
By understanding where we came from, how we got here and what is our place in the universe, we are able to see things in true perspective (e.g. how global disputes seem so trivial) and how we can do so much together to make things better.
jsantamaria1611 2 years ago 3
In which video does he try singing? It sounds kind of like a bird.
JorgWobblington 2 years ago
No, someone made an auto-tune of one of his monologues. Just type Sagan Autotune and it should come up...
leeroynaggins 2 years ago
best ever !
karthikrams 2 years ago 2
I remember seeing this on TV when I was a child. Show this to every crationist jerk awaiting the apocalypse so that some may understand that they are the problem.
grebrim 2 years ago 8
@grebrim Someone did show it to a Creationist jerk, their response was to votebot it with one star ratings.
Creationists will not accept any facts that conflict with a literal reading of the Old Testament. Even if those facts are backed-up by years of observation and experiment, in multiple disciplines of science.
jeevesbond 2 years ago 3
happy carl sagan day.
He was so awesome.
ooglywomang 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Discover universe or engage in meaningless self-destruction? That's what's known as a false alternative...
baigandine 2 years ago
This video must have been vote boted. How crazy!!!
dedringer2 2 years ago 19