True it does take more energy to convert it from plastic to petroleum, however it is questionable that the costs are greater than the environmental cost of dumping plastics in land fills and the oceans. These can be measured in real financial costs because plastics are damaging the ecosystems which reduces food productivity on land and in the sea.
The problem here is that the process needs much more energy to get the fuel than the energy the fuel finally produce. This is due to the second law of thermodinamics.
@dcsensui You are completely wong. You can never get the 350 Celsious degrees the process needs with solar energy, even with parabolic solar concentrators, like the ones in Spain or Germany, the highest temperature they reach is 165 Celsious degrees when they are used for heating water, this plastic needs much higher temperatures.
@acuaman42 -- as dcsensui said, if it's powered from renewable sources like wind, solar, or water or low-impact energy like nuclear then it's worth it. It's not so much about getting a good return on the energy invested as it is making the best use of a limited resource, namely fossil fuels.
Our infrastructure is highly reliant on fossil fuels. This would be a good stop-gap measure to "lessen the pain" as we transition away from them. Also helps reduce strain on our waste management systems.
Solar doesn't provide the steady tempature control required.
Gerg424 1 year ago
omedetou gozaimassu!!!!Sugoii....Ureshi dessu.....
Save the planet.
anusquia1 1 year ago
True it does take more energy to convert it from plastic to petroleum, however it is questionable that the costs are greater than the environmental cost of dumping plastics in land fills and the oceans. These can be measured in real financial costs because plastics are damaging the ecosystems which reduces food productivity on land and in the sea.
RobertJReynolds 1 year ago
How much are those machines?
viewervideo011242234 1 year ago
The problem here is that the process needs much more energy to get the fuel than the energy the fuel finally produce. This is due to the second law of thermodinamics.
acuaman42 1 year ago
@acuaman42 -- a solution is to power it with solar energy.
dcsensui 1 year ago
@dcsensui You are completely wong. You can never get the 350 Celsious degrees the process needs with solar energy, even with parabolic solar concentrators, like the ones in Spain or Germany, the highest temperature they reach is 165 Celsious degrees when they are used for heating water, this plastic needs much higher temperatures.
acuaman42 1 year ago
@acuaman42 -- as dcsensui said, if it's powered from renewable sources like wind, solar, or water or low-impact energy like nuclear then it's worth it. It's not so much about getting a good return on the energy invested as it is making the best use of a limited resource, namely fossil fuels.
Our infrastructure is highly reliant on fossil fuels. This would be a good stop-gap measure to "lessen the pain" as we transition away from them. Also helps reduce strain on our waste management systems.
mnemonicoverload 1 year ago
I like your process, but I have some questions to you or for somebody:
How much water does this process need to create 1 liter fuel?
How much energy and what kind of energy does it need for heating? Efficiency? After melting is there any ash?
Many thanks!
szemi888 1 year ago
Maravilha!
segundaedicao 1 year ago
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
porscheghcje 1 year ago
I want one. But I want a better translator.
Topazman12 1 year ago
they need a new PR man
luckystrke 1 year ago 9
i found the website i used google translator
SCENARIOBABY 2 years ago
hi buildaroo does blest company have a website send a msg to me with their info god bless
SCENARIOBABY 2 years ago
@SCENARIOBABY
blest.co.jp
TheMadmoey 1 year ago