by the way, pre existing common law clearly states glasses can be bent if assholes drive without insurance and fight with cops...I'm surprised you haven't read that documentation. It all started in 120 BC, caveman A was acting like a selfish douchebag and refused to drive his rockmobile with a permit, caveman B bent the shit out of his glasses.
so before the criminal code existed are you saying we have the common law right to molest children and commit vicous acts against people? that's ur logic right? because according to your ridiculous beliefs, these "pre existing common law rights" must overule the criminal code....so raping and molesting and maiming is all legal according to you...you sick sick man
Nice one Rob ! We in England are being continously pulled over by Traffic cops and local councils ,other agencys are on the spot like Department of work and pensions,driver vehicle agency and more, like the environmental agency .We the business community who generate the tax pounds to fund the terrorism used against us are having fines levied on the spot of for example , 300.00 pounds for not having a( waste carriers license)! why not look into it and post a Freemans view. uk! police state !
@geisterbahn1 I was pulled over by the traffic cops for INSPECTION OF VEHICLE .Then under arrest as I claimed Freemans rights ie,Im I free to go ! yes or no .Illigal arrest for 3 hours for nothing but driving my van.Iwas escorted by 2 traffic cars for DVLA inspection.The van was taxed ,MOT tested for 11 months ,Insured . The DVLA found a pin prick sized hole in the cab floor of the van issued issued me with a G9 (VAN IS ILLIGAL TO DRIVE UNTIL IT IS RETESTED)
Where is the definition of "motor vehicle" found? I think I found one in the MVA but that only included a physical description and a description of use but nothing about something that has been registered.
But as a person who has been at the receiving end of this kind of treatment what can we do? You do anything about it, and they give it to you 10 times worse.
Rob's saying clearly that no part of the Highway Traffic Act removes the common law right to travel. It'd help me if I could recognise an example of a statute having a clause which does remove a pre-existing right. Any suggestions out there?
Gun control laws are part of statutes and as such only refer to persons...therefore they do not remove the right to have arms.
Reread the criminal code and you will see that every single portion of it that refers to firearms ownership and possession only refer to persons. Of the times that it refers to individuals take not it also says "who without lawful excuse"
A Claim of Right is Law and as such becomes lawful excuse. Claim the Right to "free unencumbered possession and use of arms"
Look it up. Now, if the police are there to ENFORCE the QUIET, then that starts making more sense, than what we FALSELY believe to be the meaning of "peace".
Peace does NOT mean, hapiness, contentment, fairness, tranquility, or goodness.... it means QUIET.
A man in a prison cell is at PEACE, whereas a man at a party is "breaking" the peace (quiet).
It is therefore, the cops DUTY, to try and do anything he can, to get that offender jailed.
what about the term 'peace and quiet'? That implies two separate things. Plus what is and is not a breach of the peace is well defined, and does not include shouting or loud noise making, unless it is riotous.
In roman times, th eormans would march 20 soldiers into your village, to make FALSE accusations agaiinst the villagers, and then punish them (sometimes with death, it just depends how much they SUBMIT and beg).
Over a long time, peopel will start standing to attention, or smiling or throwing flowers at the soldiers, when they walk into town, so that the soldiers are as kind as they are allowed to be, rather than taking full advantage of their orders.
It did not say that at all. Look at it and it says 'therefore you are commanded in her majesty's name to appear...'. That is very very different from what you think it said.
DUDE I HAVE THIS CD MAX DIPRO. HE IS A FRIEND OF MINE. I HVE THE CD IN MY CAR IN THE DISC PLAYER. MAX IS THE MAN. LOVE YA MAX. ROB KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DO AND I James Paul: of the Dagenais Family will be practicing this aswell. For myself and my family I will educate my kids. And anyone else i can help freely.
The statutory Acts can only effectively act on the artificial persons created thereunder such as the 'driver' (a constructed "artificial person" with respect to that Act).
Only if you voluntarily stand in the role of 'driver' (an artificial person) do you consent and give them permission to act on you - the real human being; a natural person at law (common law / customary law).
Don't submit, stand free and sovereign as one of the People - a real human being / peer.
by the way, pre existing common law clearly states glasses can be bent if assholes drive without insurance and fight with cops...I'm surprised you haven't read that documentation. It all started in 120 BC, caveman A was acting like a selfish douchebag and refused to drive his rockmobile with a permit, caveman B bent the shit out of his glasses.
montrealmountie 1 month ago
so before the criminal code existed are you saying we have the common law right to molest children and commit vicous acts against people? that's ur logic right? because according to your ridiculous beliefs, these "pre existing common law rights" must overule the criminal code....so raping and molesting and maiming is all legal according to you...you sick sick man
montrealmountie 1 month ago
Nice one Rob ! We in England are being continously pulled over by Traffic cops and local councils ,other agencys are on the spot like Department of work and pensions,driver vehicle agency and more, like the environmental agency .We the business community who generate the tax pounds to fund the terrorism used against us are having fines levied on the spot of for example , 300.00 pounds for not having a( waste carriers license)! why not look into it and post a Freemans view. uk! police state !
geisterbahn1 1 month ago
@geisterbahn1 I was pulled over by the traffic cops for INSPECTION OF VEHICLE .Then under arrest as I claimed Freemans rights ie,Im I free to go ! yes or no .Illigal arrest for 3 hours for nothing but driving my van.Iwas escorted by 2 traffic cars for DVLA inspection.The van was taxed ,MOT tested for 11 months ,Insured . The DVLA found a pin prick sized hole in the cab floor of the van issued issued me with a G9 (VAN IS ILLIGAL TO DRIVE UNTIL IT IS RETESTED)
geisterbahn1 1 month ago
Rob, do you practice what you preach? Do you have a drivers license?
lblmer 10 months ago
@lblmer Yes I do practice what I preach and no I do not have a DL.
mrmitee 10 months ago
Coo coo, coo coo.
RobotKazoo 1 year ago
Where is the definition of "motor vehicle" found? I think I found one in the MVA but that only included a physical description and a description of use but nothing about something that has been registered.
thanks a lot
Epic878787 1 year ago
OPP immature Bullies.
Yes this is what the OPP are.
This is not acceptable.
But as a person who has been at the receiving end of this kind of treatment what can we do? You do anything about it, and they give it to you 10 times worse.
dmosier 1 year ago
Rob's saying clearly that no part of the Highway Traffic Act removes the common law right to travel. It'd help me if I could recognise an example of a statute having a clause which does remove a pre-existing right. Any suggestions out there?
Sliptodance 2 years ago
All of the gun control laws.
MassMIlitia 2 years ago
Gun control laws are part of statutes and as such only refer to persons...therefore they do not remove the right to have arms.
Reread the criminal code and you will see that every single portion of it that refers to firearms ownership and possession only refer to persons. Of the times that it refers to individuals take not it also says "who without lawful excuse"
A Claim of Right is Law and as such becomes lawful excuse. Claim the Right to "free unencumbered possession and use of arms"
: )
peckerwood321 1 year ago
The word "peace" means QUIET !
Look it up. Now, if the police are there to ENFORCE the QUIET, then that starts making more sense, than what we FALSELY believe to be the meaning of "peace".
Peace does NOT mean, hapiness, contentment, fairness, tranquility, or goodness.... it means QUIET.
A man in a prison cell is at PEACE, whereas a man at a party is "breaking" the peace (quiet).
It is therefore, the cops DUTY, to try and do anything he can, to get that offender jailed.
Seriously, its SICK !
MattressTopper 2 years ago
what about the term 'peace and quiet'? That implies two separate things. Plus what is and is not a breach of the peace is well defined, and does not include shouting or loud noise making, unless it is riotous.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
mrmitee 2 years ago
The summons said - 'you are commanded to appear IN HER MAJESTY'S NAME'.
That means, that the name on the summons, is OWNED by the queen. Are you her subject? I certainly hope not.
mthargoe 2 years ago
In roman times, th eormans would march 20 soldiers into your village, to make FALSE accusations agaiinst the villagers, and then punish them (sometimes with death, it just depends how much they SUBMIT and beg).
Over a long time, peopel will start standing to attention, or smiling or throwing flowers at the soldiers, when they walk into town, so that the soldiers are as kind as they are allowed to be, rather than taking full advantage of their orders.
The police are PSYCHING us, mentally.
MattressTopper 2 years ago
It did not say that at all. Look at it and it says 'therefore you are commanded in her majesty's name to appear...'. That is very very different from what you think it said.
mrmitee 2 years ago
DUDE I HAVE THIS CD MAX DIPRO. HE IS A FRIEND OF MINE. I HVE THE CD IN MY CAR IN THE DISC PLAYER. MAX IS THE MAN. LOVE YA MAX. ROB KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DO AND I James Paul: of the Dagenais Family will be practicing this aswell. For myself and my family I will educate my kids. And anyone else i can help freely.
SnipeYurFartbox 2 years ago
The statutory Acts can only effectively act on the artificial persons created thereunder such as the 'driver' (a constructed "artificial person" with respect to that Act).
Only if you voluntarily stand in the role of 'driver' (an artificial person) do you consent and give them permission to act on you - the real human being; a natural person at law (common law / customary law).
Don't submit, stand free and sovereign as one of the People - a real human being / peer.
OneManAndHisFiction 2 years ago 2
ok after vince it gets real intresting...but clearly...vince inspired what follows[and thats pure gold]
in four parts...is this part of skewl
anyhow rushing to find part two...see ya on the other side
oneundergod 2 years ago
keep it up rob. Certianly the queen has no rule over my life
gjljhjb1 2 years ago
Viva the revolution!!!!!!!!!!
static313 2 years ago
Always interesting. cheers :-)
nanciqwerty 2 years ago 2
cool,shocked at the broken glasses
NotMarkk 2 years ago 2
I know Elizabeth is not in Windsor, I was referring to the Castle.
mrmitee 2 years ago