Congratulations, Pete, on your very impressive reelection victory - 72% WOW! There are still some intelligent voters around! The baggers didn't take you down, and you will be an island of sanity in the next Congress! We desperately need you !
He's not wrong... what he is, is an arrogant pussfilled maggot that's been in office far too long. Oh and way to re-elect Chairperson Boxer, California. I was just there... it's fucking beautiful. But I can't put words to how glad I am to no longer be living there.
That makes a great amount of sense given the mainstream media. I wonder if the other guy gets to roll out of bed for election day, and I only mean that in the most pessimistic, realist sense. When I see people like this compromist spewing packing nugget diflection of grave ills. This is deadly to us to keep him in office.
@tugtugbug926 What the world does not see is that Iraq is the center of the globalist's empire, if we were at an ideological war, we would break the infrastructure of Iraq, not installing billions of dollars of America into Iraq. We are getting heads blown off until it is finished, and Obama is of bated breath to take the credit.
@kpharris32 There is a simple way to see what is going on. As usual, "follow the money" leads you to the main players. Money flows from the tax payers to large corporation as contractors in the wars. The contractors have a history of being caught cheating the tax payers, putting the troops in danger and generally making a mess of things but they are still getting paid. There were no WMDs but there was oil. Lots of places do have WMDs but no oil.
Wow. While I despise stark for his authoritarianism on economic issues, I have to hand it to him for speaking out against wars. Still wouldn't vote for him though. Socialism is a disease and freedom is the cure. Democrats, Republicans...who needs em. Rule yourselves!!!!!
where is the outrage today ? it doesnt even exist.
Iraq is an absolute disaster today but those that claimed to oppose the war because of the death and destruction it caused dont even lift a finger to help the iraqis.
@rllang01 The problem is that Americans don't think that they really can help. If you have contacts in Iraq, please help to tell people what they can do. There is a general feeling of helplessness at this point because the mess is just to big and too complex. We know that things would be better if the war was not started or was done properly but we now are where we are. Iraq is a horrid mess but unlike a flood or earthquake, we can't see any way to fix it.
@Zubirrex There is an old saying "When the rich can pay the poor to die for them, the poor can make a good living". The current military is too much a case of the rich paying the poor to die for them.
The only thing incorrect in Stark's comments was the last word. It was ego and not amusement that is to blame for the war and the mess that was made of it. As bad as the situation in Iraq was, the incompetence made it worse.
@Gmemo84 Fake outrage is a common tactic. These days, the republicans are using it a little more than is best for their cause. It has become obvious that their outrage is not an honest reaction and it now works as a "tell" indicating the place where their arguments are the weakest. We now can use it as a guide to the places where they know their arguments won't stand up in the light of day.
@DONGOE I don't expect Pete Stark to lose the next election. The republican who is up against him makes him has a very hard job in front of him. As with all republicans he has to either (a) get people to forget that it was his parties policies that sent the economy off the cliff or (b) explain a new set of ideas that sound reasonable. He appears only to be convincing people that he is a weasel. This means that he will lose th election. Stark will win because the other guy lost.
@DONGOE The republicans picked there own guy. Unfortunately, the republican party has been taken over by the loons. You can't get past a primary election unless you are willing to appear to agree with them. In primaries and off year elections it is those who are very motivated who go to the polls. This means that to unseat someone you have to pander to the extremes in the primary and then hope to move to the middle in the general. The extremes of the republicans are very extreme.
@knowledgemonger Their....nevermind. I just expected someone with a name like "knowledgemonger" to have a decent grasp of the English language. My mistake.
You shoulda heard what he said to Scott McInnis when he told him to shut up in 2003 "You think you are big enough to make me, you little wimp? Come on, come over here and make me, I dare you…You little fruitcake. You little fruitcake. I said you are a fruitcake." haha!
have any of you who agree with this "man" seen/heard his other comments? he's a crackpot and hasn't shown a different side since the day he was elected.
p.s. if you can't correctly spell "entertain", or if you use the word "hater", we really don't want to hear what you have you say. At least pretend to be educated. Use spell check.
That's so true! People of this great land need to wake up and start thinking for themselves instead of this censored news agencies tell us what they (media) telling how to think and act.america has lost a generation because of this war! Uk or ass who do think is the international bankers! The federal reserve.
@dasaniii7147 Obama is doing good only for the banks and our owners. HE IS A PUPPET and a liar. Liar because he has not brought the troops home, obamalies(dot)net
@dasaniii7174 Obama is doing a good job? How? Name one good thing he's done? And don't say some general bullshit like he saved our economy...1 out of 8 people don't have a job...What has he done??? Are you serious?
@KingsorPawn I should comment on the economy. The disaster happened under Bush and headed us towards a complete meltdown of the same order as 1929. Unlike 1929, the politicians did sort of the right thing to prevent the deflationary spiral of 1929 from setting in but there really was not a lot more than that that could be done. If the government had been running a surplus for a few years they could have done far more.
In Afghanistan we need to use drones to cover our troops,wE should be exposing our PEOPLe to the least amount of risk .
&&we should take all the women out of Afghanistan that want to leave those abusive sick Afghans.
Iraq was total mistake.
BUSH intentionally under supplied our troops&should have been given Hell by the Rep.members of Congress.BUT instead of worrying about OUR troops ,they worried about covering up their IGNORANCE.
@RasputinSir The war in Afghanistan was justified on the basis that that is where the events of 911 were plotted. Fair enough. Start that war, but once started finish the job. Don't take your eye off the ball and let the situation head down the path towards a loss. Closing the Prince Sultan air base in an effort to appease the extremists was a really dumb thing to do. Letting the war profiteers run away with billions of dollars is worse than merely dumb.
Uk or ass u must be young. Shallow minded. Listen hear me out,people sure intertain the rhetoric of blaming Obama but the reality of the who economic meltdown is Rep/Dem fault! Period. But remember that in the game of politics thing just don't happen by chance. No it's been all planned out
@0penupyoureyes Given the situation Obama was handed, he obviously felt that it was possible and worth the effort to still win the war. He was handed a very bad situation with 2 bad outcomes. The situation was not of his making.
Dude get real! Open your eyes this is not Obamas WAR this is and alwYs will be the Bushes WAR .Obama just inherited from bush. This war has been funded by the international bankers.you don't have to believe me. Do ur own research.!two main reasons were in that part of the world. OIL. And PERMANENT MILITARY BASES for first strike abilities.just remember one thing each president has a role to fit into this puzzle.
Obama is no different than the Bushes. He accepted MORE financial support from the military industrial complex, oil and bankers than any other president. Research much? Yes the IMF and UN is pushing the buttons but a Constitutional president would not be taking billions of dollars or marching orders from a european banker. Obama just got another 40 billion to further the Afghan war, which will come out of OUR POCKETS. Our taxes/interest are paying for the ammunition.
@dasaniii7147 I know, I know the NWO. Yeah we are really benefitting and receiving tons of oil. As for bases, we could locate them with the Kurds. Do your own real research and quit listening to every word the Alex Jones utters.
@UKORASS It was Bush who started the war in Afghanistan. In about 2002 he abandoned the war and moved his attention to Iraq. The US was on the path to losing the war when Obama came into office. He was faced with 2 bad options. (1) Just accept the loss and pull out. (2) Basically start a new war with more troops and win it. He took the latter option. Personally, I can't see that there really was anything in Afghanistan worth the blood of more Americans but denying the Talban may be it.
@knowledgemonger II just love you revisionist. Usually you wait a decade or two to find and rewrite the underside. It was Obama who repeatedly decreed that the real war was in Afghanistan and that he would go in and clean it out. I am no great fan of Bush but the surge was relatively successful and that’s exactly what Obama ordered, (surge light) in Afghanistan and claims it was his idea.
@UKORASS Bush started a war in Afghanistan. This was before Obama even appeared on the scene. If you are willing to say that since Bush did not leave the war won, he lost it, then this new war could be Obama's war. If you are unwilling to say that Bush lost the war in Afghanistan, then this remains Bush's war. Most people don't want to say that Bush lost it, so it most certainly is Bush's war.
@djfirekid Yes, I have actually heard people trying to claim that the melt down was the fault of the Obama. The republicans would really like to run away from the results of their policies. If giving tax cuts to the rich would produce good results, we would now be in an economic wonderland. Eisenhower had a healthy growing economy. Go look at the tax policies of his era and you will see that this whole cutting taxes on the rich to improve the economy thing is a lie.
@DONGOE The only word in what Pete Stark said that was incorrect was the last one. It was "ego" not "amusement" that got so many americans killed. Bush took his eye off Afghanistan to do Iraq and then didn't send as many troops to Iraq as general Shinseki told him he would need because of his inflated ego. Iraq could have waited until OBL was caught and could have been correctly resourced but a bunch of chest-thumpers were in charge. Eisenhower or even Nixon would have known better.
@DONGOE I don't say "dah" because that is not the same as correctly pointing out that you are the fool here or that Pete Stark was largely correct about the needless loss of american lives as a result of what Bush did.
@knowledgemonger - become a knowledge monger and listen to some of the other BS that Pete Stark spews. He is a typical arrogant, I-know-better-than-you-do-what's-good-for-you politician. This guy has to go down, and go down hard.
Keep blaming GWB...that's the only answer no-mind sheep like you have.
@DONGOE It is you who is the sheep that continues to fallow Bush even after all the rest of us have seen that the path he lead you down was off a cliff. You continue to support the republicans after their policies have been shown to be a total disaster. The video in question shows Pete Stark being largely correct. He got the last word wrong it was ego not amusement but the effect is the same. Americans have died because of the morons you are still supporting.
@knowledgemonger - You make a lot of ignorant assumptions: I said that Pete Stark was a fool. Now you must be a typical Lib who assumes that I am a Republican and supported Bush. Wrong !!!
Now regarding Pete Stark - view this arrogant, egotistical fool on the youtube video - THE BORDERS ARE QUITE SECURE. Congressman Pete Stark's Town hall meeting in Fremont CA.
@DONGOE I made a completely reasonable assumption that I think still is likely to be true. Notice that I said that you "continue to support the republicans". There are many who will claim to not be republicans and yet support them. Many of these are folks who call themselves libertarians. They claim not to be republicans and yet they support the republicans. They claim not to be following Bush but if you look at the direction they favor it is the one Bush points.
@knowledgemonger - You are sounding like another all-knowing elitist lib; assume (ass-u-me) what you want. I am a recovering liberal and am now a Independent Conservative. I refuse to have any political party tell me what to do and how to vote. There is good and bad in all political parties; I vote according to the issue. I refuse to be told what to do by career politicians that probably have a law degree and think that they're smarter than everyone else.
what was unbelieveable about that, lots of americans beleive the same thing, lol show some of the republicants mumblings in congress, how about the one where the congressman was told by one of his supporters that "I am a proud american terrorist" and the congressman laughed and said great. there is film by the way.
The only word in the whole thing that is wrong is the last one. "amusement" He is absolutely right that Bush got people killed needlessly and ran up a huge debt to pay for doing things the wrong way. Iraq could have waited until we got Osama Bin Laden. Instead Bush let him get away. Bush closed the Prince Sultan airbase in an attempt to appease the terrorists. At this point things are so messed up that there can't be a good outcome. The best we can go for is the least bad outcome.
Hey Pete, let's not retaliate when Muslim crazyasses fly planes into our buildings and kill thousand of Americans....let's just pretend like it didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the 1993 bombing of the WTC didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the bombing of our embassy didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the USS Cole wasn't bombed...all by who? Islamic wackos, and you know what Pete? The Muslim wackos sound like you, WACKO!
@donlemedwn "Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth" is badly misnamed. There may be some engineers involved but they would be the stupid ones. The trade center buildings fell in exactly the way that a tall structure will. Only in cartoons do they fall to the side. As soon as a building tries to lean to the side, the top must be trying to accelerate faster than the bottom. A little physics will tell you what happens next. It really was the airplane fuel that did the deed.
@donlemedwn AE911 is composed of 1,230 Architects and Engineers and 8,859 supporters including Architectural and Engineering Students. Your "some Engineers involved", numbers in the hundreds.
Yes, in a toppling scenario, the top not only TRIES to accelerate faster than the bottom, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS.
@donlemedwn On the AE911 website, they list the names and license numbers of the professionals involved. So you, LIESPREADER, have an agenda to support the traitors to America that really did the crime on 911. You WILL be exposed. You better have an effective exit strategy, it won't be pretty.
@knowledgemonger Only in cartoons do two buildings, hit in different places suffer exactly the same destructive failure. In the real world, if you built two identical structures and hit them with anything, they would NOT suffer the EXACT same type of failure. A little physics says that if you weaken ONE side of a structure, with the OTHER side intact, you would have a toppling effect. ONLY if the support columns were taken out simultaneously, would you get a straight down collapse. FAIL.
@donlemedwn They only fall over in cartoons. Once you start a failure in that sort of building, the only option is for the mass to fall nearly straight down. Once you start the structure going down, two structures made in the same manner will fail in the same sort of way. Try stacking up piles of bricks and knocking them over and you will see the effect. If you make the stack tall enough, the bricks from the top of the stack never are the furthest from the center.
@knowledgemonger "Once you get the structure going down" is a very telling statement. That's the point. What does it take to get steel framed buildings to collapse straight down, just like a controlled demolition?
IT TAKES A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
If it WALKS like a duck, and QUACKS like a duck ,and LOOKS like a duck,
IT'S A FREAKING DUCK !!!!!!!!!
That applies to Sayanim like you as well, of course.
@donlemedwn No, any failure of the structure causes the same result. It doesn't matter what starts it. The duck is quacks like is the one where it fell because the jet fuel overheated the structural iron making it to weak to hold up the weight above. This is what caused the building to come down. There was no controlled demolition. Such conspiracy theories just don't hold up in the face of the facts.
@knowledgemonger That is the most ignorant statement possible in the light of the laws of physics. Where and to what degree the 'failure" is extremely important.
Not to mention your total lack of proper use of the language. But you're trying to come across as not too educated or intelligent, aren't you. Here's a tip, Don't overdo it, you expose yourself for who and what you are. A liar and a traitor.
@donlemedwn Your statement is the ignorant one. I have pointed out the facts. You don't like the facts because they don't fit with your pet conspiracy theory. I have used proper and correct language within the 500 character limit to point out that you don't know what you are talking about. You don't like it so you question my perfectly acceptable english in an attempt to deflect the conversation away from the fact that you are supporting a nonsense claim.
@knowledgemonger "The duck is quacks like is the one where it fell because the jet fuel overheated the structural iron making it to weak to hold up the weight above."
============
Such errors in language have nothing to do with limits.
Tell you what. Look up, on YouTube, Kennedy Conspiracy Speech. One of the greatest presidents in America's history spoke to the press about conspiracies and secret societies. He was asking the press to help him in resisting their influence.
@donlemedwn It should say "the duck it" not "the duck is". I do make typographical errors from time to time but since my meaning is completely clear and easy to understand it should not be an issue. You only take issue because I point out that you are wrong in what you assert.
@knowledgemonger We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
@TheBarrett1971 The delay fromn the crash to the fall was because the remaining metal had to heat up to lose strength. Once that happened, the fall is as a building made as you correctly describe it would dictate. Once a failure starts, the building will come straight down. The upper stories fell onto the lower ones. The hit caused the next lower one to fail and the chain continues. The physics says the rest.
@TheBarrett1971 Yeah, sure, the Towers had an external backbone. Try this for an education on how the Towers were built.
Sub the (*) with a period, that should work.
911research(*)wtc7(*)net/wtc/arch/core(*)html
But you know this don't you. Keep in mind, your activities in covering up this monumental crime makes you an accessory. You'd better have an exit strategy. You WILL be brought to justice.
@donlemedwn We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
@donlemedwn You sir are an idiot get you facts straight and stop watching Mikey Moore movies. The buildings were designed simply for cost and as such had NO INSIDE METAL BACKBONE. You know like the Empire State, the walls were designed to be the support learn facts then we can talk and piss little boy.
@TheBarrett1971 Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. Like the Empire State Building??? You're comparing a design from the 30s with the Twin Towers ?
Look LOSER. At one time, slimeballs like you could lie and get away with it. Today, only a small effort will get you the TRUTH about how the Towers were built. NOTHING at all to do with the ESB, nor any other building ever made.
CONdoleeza Rice said that no one knew the Towers could be attacked in such a way.
@donlemedwn I went to check just to make sure. The quote "lightweight perimeter tube design" Should let you know what I found. You are talking through your hat. The WTC design was as TheBarrett1971 and I have been telling you. It wouldn't matter much really because both it and a design with an internal backbone would still have the natural property of wanting to fall straight down on its self and not over. Buildings do not fall like live trees.
@knowledgemonger Your good but not good enough. Repeated lying about the facts of the Tower's construction just won't do anymore. You KNOW that you and others claimed that the outer shell was the load bearing element in the Tower's construction. You also KNOW that this is not true, that the Towers had an internal core structure that was the actual load bearing element.
Yet you continue to lie and lie and lie.
You and Barrett are one and the same person. Don't think you're fooling anyone.
@donlemedwn I know that the towers were as I described them and that the fell in the manner that physics says they would. I also know that you constantly repeating your false claim[1] won't change the facts.
[1] I won't call what you say a lie because I expect that your really believe what you say. Children talk about the tooth-fairy and are not telling a lie when they do because they really believe in what they say.
@knowledgemonger Physics? So you have a degree in physics, do you? Try your theories on Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. This is composed of over a thousand, licensed Engineers and Architects with many thousands more supporters in various professions. Those include thousands of engineering and architectural students. Their numbers continue to increase.
Your description of the Tower's construction is a total fabrication, With a little digging, a search on the Net will reveal that.
@donlemedwn Yes physics is the science by which we understand what happens in the real world. It is the science that shows that the buildings fell in just the way that buildings of that design will fail. The buildings were built as has been explained to you and really failed as has been explained to you. That there are others who like you prefer conspiracy theories over reality doesn't make your opinions correct.
@knowledgemonger Yes, and over a thousand professional, architects and engineers are telling YOU that you have no idea as to what you are talking about. I use my own common sense AND the word of trained professionals to tell me that you are WRONG.
What is the matter with you? You are in a profound state of denial, it seems. You claim NO professional training and yet you STILL insist that you are right and that the professionals are wrong. You should get professional help, old man.
@donlemedwn I am willing to take the words of the millions who know what they are talking about and who give answers consistent with the laws of physics over the words of the few who have bought into the nonsense conspiracy theory claims. The buildings were constructed as you have been told and fell exactly as the laws of physics dictate. That there are others who believe the same nonsense as you does not make you right. It just makes them others who are wrong.
@knowledgemonger So what is this organization of millions of professionals who have studied the issue and presented their findings? Do they list their names, locations and licenses? A&Efor911truth does.
You are lying about the construction of the Towers. The Nazis said that all you have to do is repeat a lie often enough and it gets to be believed. And the bigger the lie, the more effective the strategy.
Unlike the 30s, today we have online armies duking it out. Truth WILL prevail.
@donlemedwn The lawyers have a saying. "When the law is against you argue the facts. When the facts are against you argue the law. When both the law and the facts are against you call the other guy names." I see that you are getting nearly that desperate and are resorting to claims of having won an argument you see yourself losing badly. You claims about the structure of the towers can disproved by any who care to use google to find the truth.
@donlemedwn You are the one who is misrepresenting the construction of the towers. You can go look it up if you wish to know the truth.
The professionals who know the truth about the construction of the towers and how they fell fell no need to form a support group and sit around telling each other stories. They get on with the business they are in knowing that there is no need to do anything about the twin towers except perhaps build new ones.
@donlemedwn We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
@donlemedwn Gimp learn facts first and stop blogging in mom's basement. The floors were prefab and each on put on top of the other. No metal structure to hold any of it up at all just the walls as I said.
i think the president is not the only one who should get their heads blowed off piece of shit bastard stark..you are one hated man...the hatred in this country for you people in washington is not something you are going to want to deal with...why don't you just disappear and spare yourself some trouble..you worthless anti-american communist pig
what a mean, rude, arrogant old has-been. this guy has no class, and no kindness anywhere in his soul...i bet his kids hate him...and his wife, if he still has one... is depressed...he is a vicious human being
he's up for re-election this fall and is likely to win unless we can get someone like Chris Pareja (look up his website) on the ballot. people are trying to get enough signatures to get him on the ballot by Aug 6.
Let's help defeat Pompus Pete the Progressive Parasite!
@rcvideoshooter he is doing good by reminding people that we are spending money we don't have on a war we should NEVER HAVE STARTED! we COULD spend our money to find a cure for cancer, AIDS etc. We COULD spend our money to give every child in the country medical coverage. We could spend it to give clean water to people all over the world for next to no cost, we COULD spend it on a million good things all over the world or in our own country, but the American people have chosen to spend it on war
@john48martin Now Bill Clinton was a fiscally responsible President. But Obama quadrupled the deficit with hi "Stimulus Package" alone. He inherited Bush's mess and is outspending him too.
@gyrate4: CONGRESS holds the purse strings moron, how can Clinton be "fiscally responsible" when the Republicans had a MAJORITY during most of his administration? You should not be allowed to vote you are too stupid to understand the concept of a constitutional Republic.
@espada9 I dislike stark as much as you, and you need some manners. No need to name call. Clinton made it his goal to balance the budget and, with the republican congress, he did with a large surplus. He did this, partly, by taxing Social Security. I'd rather see them tax us much less and spend less. Get rid of the welfare culture and illegal immigration that is going to break us with their huge broods alone..
@gyrate4 Remember, that it was only a budget surplus during Clinton's admin if you DON'T factor in (or purposely omit) the tens of trillions in unfunded mandates due in the future.
If there was a Clinton surplus, how do you explain a budget DEFICIT for every year he was in office? Wouldn't a surplus mean a deficit of zero, or even a negative number?
Sorry, but the last time the US Federal Gov't was debt free was 1836. Jackson was President.
@yelvaberry Rhetorical question? Are you suggesting that the republican controlled congress gutted the military, and raised taxes while Clinton was in office without it being at his Urging? A President, like a Congress, can be fiscally responsible or wasteful.
@gyrate4 Bush's mess? How about Andrew Cuomo's mess..HUD sec 4 Clinton sued Accubanc, won 2 Billion in loans for subprime mortgages that's what started this mess in 1998; 15,000 loans that were fixed low interest, balloon after 5 yrs, no qualifying, with high interest at the end of 5 yrs and backed by Fannie/Freddie, sold to Wall Street when he knew these mortg were high risk of failure. 90% mort loans were Fannie/Freddie after that. In 2003 shit hit the fan when loans started failing.
This guy is a total asshole. Someone should just take him out behind the woodshed and . . . well, I can't say that on youtube or it will get removed, but you know what I mean.
Stark is an amusement himself. He can't care for this country because he cares too much about himself. I'm thankful I'm not a liberal--to think like him would definitely be a curse.
You go Pete! End the frigging wars already! I hear talk of going into Iran? Are they insane there in Washington? How the he'll would you pay for that?
This has been flagged as spam show
George Bush should be tried!
deeppurple28 1 year ago
Pete Stark is right! don't be mad at him because he has balls and you don't lol
rickrizzle47 1 year ago
Congratulations, Pete, on your very impressive reelection victory - 72% WOW! There are still some intelligent voters around! The baggers didn't take you down, and you will be an island of sanity in the next Congress! We desperately need you !
steveinchelsea 1 second ago
steveinchelsea 1 year ago
He's not wrong... what he is, is an arrogant pussfilled maggot that's been in office far too long. Oh and way to re-elect Chairperson Boxer, California. I was just there... it's fucking beautiful. But I can't put words to how glad I am to no longer be living there.
MisterAvis 1 year ago
That makes a great amount of sense given the mainstream media. I wonder if the other guy gets to roll out of bed for election day, and I only mean that in the most pessimistic, realist sense. When I see people like this compromist spewing packing nugget diflection of grave ills. This is deadly to us to keep him in office.
kpharris32 1 year ago
kinda harsh, but hey, thats kinda true.
we are throwing away the future of the US
in war and sending them to basically confirmed death.
he's got a point.
tugtugbug926 1 year ago
@tugtugbug926 What the world does not see is that Iraq is the center of the globalist's empire, if we were at an ideological war, we would break the infrastructure of Iraq, not installing billions of dollars of America into Iraq. We are getting heads blown off until it is finished, and Obama is of bated breath to take the credit.
kpharris32 1 year ago
@kpharris32 There is a simple way to see what is going on. As usual, "follow the money" leads you to the main players. Money flows from the tax payers to large corporation as contractors in the wars. The contractors have a history of being caught cheating the tax payers, putting the troops in danger and generally making a mess of things but they are still getting paid. There were no WMDs but there was oil. Lots of places do have WMDs but no oil.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
I hate Pete Stark but he made a rather good point here!
madderbass 1 year ago
FBI, CIA, NSA. Who needs them? They are the elite monitoring system from our FREEDOM.
runinstyledotcome 1 year ago
Stark is not as smart as he would like us all to believe. Not by a long shot.
FenderMan1191 1 year ago
umm one word. DAMN
zackvbra 1 year ago
Wow. While I despise stark for his authoritarianism on economic issues, I have to hand it to him for speaking out against wars. Still wouldn't vote for him though. Socialism is a disease and freedom is the cure. Democrats, Republicans...who needs em. Rule yourselves!!!!!
renegade2142 1 year ago
Pete Stark = LEGEND!!!
deadlydan1993 1 year ago
War is wrong. Republicans and democrats both suck.
Why dont you people sculp yourselves and vote independently. Vote on what you agree with and not just because a "party" says they do so you do.
unitedairforcepilot 1 year ago
Facts are un-beeeeeee-lieeevable.
aggradef 1 year ago
where is the outrage today ? it doesnt even exist.
Iraq is an absolute disaster today but those that claimed to oppose the war because of the death and destruction it caused dont even lift a finger to help the iraqis.
Its all a charade...
rllang01 1 year ago
@rllang01 The problem is that Americans don't think that they really can help. If you have contacts in Iraq, please help to tell people what they can do. There is a general feeling of helplessness at this point because the mess is just to big and too complex. We know that things would be better if the war was not started or was done properly but we now are where we are. Iraq is a horrid mess but unlike a flood or earthquake, we can't see any way to fix it.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@rllang01 There's no outrage because there was no draft. People tend to care more when it's happened to their kids on an involuntary basis.
Zubirrex 1 year ago
@Zubirrex There is an old saying "When the rich can pay the poor to die for them, the poor can make a good living". The current military is too much a case of the rich paying the poor to die for them.
The only thing incorrect in Stark's comments was the last word. It was ego and not amusement that is to blame for the war and the mess that was made of it. As bad as the situation in Iraq was, the incompetence made it worse.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Whats so Outrageous?
Gmemo84 1 year ago
@Gmemo84 Fake outrage is a common tactic. These days, the republicans are using it a little more than is best for their cause. It has become obvious that their outrage is not an honest reaction and it now works as a "tell" indicating the place where their arguments are the weakest. We now can use it as a guide to the places where they know their arguments won't stand up in the light of day.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Unbelievable comments? No.
Unbelievably true, perhaps.
FuckYouLetMeLogIn 1 year ago
Speeking the truth yes he is...
trebleclefts 1 year ago
#Impeach #puppet #Pete. Pass it on…
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
I hope that we say bye-bye to Pete in his next election.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE I don't expect Pete Stark to lose the next election. The republican who is up against him makes him has a very hard job in front of him. As with all republicans he has to either (a) get people to forget that it was his parties policies that sent the economy off the cliff or (b) explain a new set of ideas that sound reasonable. He appears only to be convincing people that he is a weasel. This means that he will lose th election. Stark will win because the other guy lost.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - Too bad....elect someone that you know is a complete fool instead of a weasel. I would rather have a weasel.
One thing people have to ask - did Pete Stark have a hand, somewhere behind the scenes, of selecting a candidate that he knew he could beat?
If yes, then he is also a weasel, a snake and will eventually get what he deserves; whatever that may be.
Pete Stark is politically smart, but a complete fool outside of DC.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE The republicans picked there own guy. Unfortunately, the republican party has been taken over by the loons. You can't get past a primary election unless you are willing to appear to agree with them. In primaries and off year elections it is those who are very motivated who go to the polls. This means that to unseat someone you have to pander to the extremes in the primary and then hope to move to the middle in the general. The extremes of the republicans are very extreme.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Their....nevermind. I just expected someone with a name like "knowledgemonger" to have a decent grasp of the English language. My mistake.
NRPBrute 1 year ago
@NRPBrute Yes I did use "there" in place of "their". The meaning is clear and I assume you agree with the meaning.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger I see.
NRPBrute 1 year ago
You shoulda heard what he said to Scott McInnis when he told him to shut up in 2003 "You think you are big enough to make me, you little wimp? Come on, come over here and make me, I dare you…You little fruitcake. You little fruitcake. I said you are a fruitcake." haha!
kensei85 1 year ago
have any of you who agree with this "man" seen/heard his other comments? he's a crackpot and hasn't shown a different side since the day he was elected.
p.s. if you can't correctly spell "entertain", or if you use the word "hater", we really don't want to hear what you have you say. At least pretend to be educated. Use spell check.
sweetflyer07 1 year ago
Well he voted for all of Obama's wars. I forgot those are the "good wars", sorry I forgot.
PatricHenry 1 year ago
#Impeach #puppet #Pete. Pass it on… (That’s #CONgressman #PeteStark #Stark)
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
i know for sure he was drunk there... for sure
uswestons 1 year ago
Is this guy insane?
bdac14 1 year ago
Comment removed
russkeller 1 year ago
That's so true! People of this great land need to wake up and start thinking for themselves instead of this censored news agencies tell us what they (media) telling how to think and act.america has lost a generation because of this war! Uk or ass who do think is the international bankers! The federal reserve.
dasaniii7147 1 year ago
@dasaniii7147 that comment made no sense. try again, and maybe we'll listen.
sweetflyer07 1 year ago
Quite blaming Obama. He is doing pretty damn good don't be a hater
dasaniii7147 1 year ago
@dasaniii7147 Obama is doing good only for the banks and our owners. HE IS A PUPPET and a liar. Liar because he has not brought the troops home, obamalies(dot)net
skb0rzn 1 year ago
@dasaniii7174 Obama is doing a good job? How? Name one good thing he's done? And don't say some general bullshit like he saved our economy...1 out of 8 people don't have a job...What has he done??? Are you serious?
KingsorPawn 1 year ago
@KingsorPawn I should comment on the economy. The disaster happened under Bush and headed us towards a complete meltdown of the same order as 1929. Unlike 1929, the politicians did sort of the right thing to prevent the deflationary spiral of 1929 from setting in but there really was not a lot more than that that could be done. If the government had been running a surplus for a few years they could have done far more.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
In Afghanistan we need to use drones to cover our troops,wE should be exposing our PEOPLe to the least amount of risk .
&&we should take all the women out of Afghanistan that want to leave those abusive sick Afghans.
Iraq was total mistake.
BUSH intentionally under supplied our troops&should have been given Hell by the Rep.members of Congress.BUT instead of worrying about OUR troops ,they worried about covering up their IGNORANCE.
RasputinSir 1 year ago
RasputinSir = /watch?v=CplUqjQqTq0
5ezpzez 1 year ago
According to Stark National debt is goooood, This guys an Asshole, capital A.
chewbaca1989 1 year ago
This was when Bush was the appointed Commander in Chief.Bush was wasting too much money&NEVER SHOULD HAVE STARTED THAT WAR.
RasputinSir 1 year ago
@RasputinSir The war in Afghanistan was justified on the basis that that is where the events of 911 were plotted. Fair enough. Start that war, but once started finish the job. Don't take your eye off the ball and let the situation head down the path towards a loss. Closing the Prince Sultan air base in an effort to appease the extremists was a really dumb thing to do. Letting the war profiteers run away with billions of dollars is worse than merely dumb.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
#CONgressman #puppet Pete #Stark is either retarded or has Alzheimer’s. Maybe both.
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
Whats wrong with all these peoples comments of negative responses.. Congressman is telling the truth and that was in 2007.....2010 and counting
italianman004 1 year ago
Uk or ass u must be young. Shallow minded. Listen hear me out,people sure intertain the rhetoric of blaming Obama but the reality of the who economic meltdown is Rep/Dem fault! Period. But remember that in the game of politics thing just don't happen by chance. No it's been all planned out
dasaniii7147 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh ha ha ha ha ha ha
Bagatronic 1 year ago
@0penupyoureyes Given the situation Obama was handed, he obviously felt that it was possible and worth the effort to still win the war. He was handed a very bad situation with 2 bad outcomes. The situation was not of his making.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Stark is right, that's exactly what they're going to do.
.
Doesn't matter if it's (R) or (D). Bet since it's a (D) in the oval office he hasn't said anything like that.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
Dude get real! Open your eyes this is not Obamas WAR this is and alwYs will be the Bushes WAR .Obama just inherited from bush. This war has been funded by the international bankers.you don't have to believe me. Do ur own research.!two main reasons were in that part of the world. OIL. And PERMANENT MILITARY BASES for first strike abilities.just remember one thing each president has a role to fit into this puzzle.
dasaniii7147 1 year ago
@dasaniii7147
Obama is no different than the Bushes. He accepted MORE financial support from the military industrial complex, oil and bankers than any other president. Research much? Yes the IMF and UN is pushing the buttons but a Constitutional president would not be taking billions of dollars or marching orders from a european banker. Obama just got another 40 billion to further the Afghan war, which will come out of OUR POCKETS. Our taxes/interest are paying for the ammunition.
brown55061 1 year ago 2
@dasaniii7147 I know, I know the NWO. Yeah we are really benefitting and receiving tons of oil. As for bases, we could locate them with the Kurds. Do your own real research and quit listening to every word the Alex Jones utters.
UKORASS 1 year ago
Stark, what about Obama's war in Afghanistan? Do you feel the same way? God your an asshole.
UKORASS 1 year ago
@UKORASS It was Bush who started the war in Afghanistan. In about 2002 he abandoned the war and moved his attention to Iraq. The US was on the path to losing the war when Obama came into office. He was faced with 2 bad options. (1) Just accept the loss and pull out. (2) Basically start a new war with more troops and win it. He took the latter option. Personally, I can't see that there really was anything in Afghanistan worth the blood of more Americans but denying the Talban may be it.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger II just love you revisionist. Usually you wait a decade or two to find and rewrite the underside. It was Obama who repeatedly decreed that the real war was in Afghanistan and that he would go in and clean it out. I am no great fan of Bush but the surge was relatively successful and that’s exactly what Obama ordered, (surge light) in Afghanistan and claims it was his idea.
UKORASS 1 year ago
@UKORASS Bush started a war in Afghanistan. This was before Obama even appeared on the scene. If you are willing to say that since Bush did not leave the war won, he lost it, then this new war could be Obama's war. If you are unwilling to say that Bush lost the war in Afghanistan, then this remains Bush's war. Most people don't want to say that Bush lost it, so it most certainly is Bush's war.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@UKORASS Obama's war...... how quickly they forget about the guy that started the war..... let me guesss it was obama's financial meltdown
djfirekid 1 year ago
@djfirekid Yes, I have actually heard people trying to claim that the melt down was the fault of the Obama. The republicans would really like to run away from the results of their policies. If giving tax cuts to the rich would produce good results, we would now be in an economic wonderland. Eisenhower had a healthy growing economy. Go look at the tax policies of his era and you will see that this whole cutting taxes on the rich to improve the economy thing is a lie.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Pete Stark - You are a fool !!!
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE The only word in what Pete Stark said that was incorrect was the last one. It was "ego" not "amusement" that got so many americans killed. Bush took his eye off Afghanistan to do Iraq and then didn't send as many troops to Iraq as general Shinseki told him he would need because of his inflated ego. Iraq could have waited until OBL was caught and could have been correctly resourced but a bunch of chest-thumpers were in charge. Eisenhower or even Nixon would have known better.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - Pete stark is a FOOL !!!
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE You are the fool here
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - Why?
DONGOE 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - You need to get more knowledge, monger.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - An absolute genius comeback...... why don't you just say "dah."
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE I don't say "dah" because that is not the same as correctly pointing out that you are the fool here or that Pete Stark was largely correct about the needless loss of american lives as a result of what Bush did.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - become a knowledge monger and listen to some of the other BS that Pete Stark spews. He is a typical arrogant, I-know-better-than-you-do-what's-good-for-you politician. This guy has to go down, and go down hard.
Keep blaming GWB...that's the only answer no-mind sheep like you have.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE It is you who is the sheep that continues to fallow Bush even after all the rest of us have seen that the path he lead you down was off a cliff. You continue to support the republicans after their policies have been shown to be a total disaster. The video in question shows Pete Stark being largely correct. He got the last word wrong it was ego not amusement but the effect is the same. Americans have died because of the morons you are still supporting.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - You make a lot of ignorant assumptions: I said that Pete Stark was a fool. Now you must be a typical Lib who assumes that I am a Republican and supported Bush. Wrong !!!
Now regarding Pete Stark - view this arrogant, egotistical fool on the youtube video - THE BORDERS ARE QUITE SECURE. Congressman Pete Stark's Town hall meeting in Fremont CA.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE I made a completely reasonable assumption that I think still is likely to be true. Notice that I said that you "continue to support the republicans". There are many who will claim to not be republicans and yet support them. Many of these are folks who call themselves libertarians. They claim not to be republicans and yet they support the republicans. They claim not to be following Bush but if you look at the direction they favor it is the one Bush points.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - You are sounding like another all-knowing elitist lib; assume (ass-u-me) what you want. I am a recovering liberal and am now a Independent Conservative. I refuse to have any political party tell me what to do and how to vote. There is good and bad in all political parties; I vote according to the issue. I refuse to be told what to do by career politicians that probably have a law degree and think that they're smarter than everyone else.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger - And oh, by the way, Pete Stark may have had some good points, but now - He is a arrogant fool !!!
DONGOE 1 year ago
It's quite clear retirement is near...
wakesheep 1 year ago
what was unbelieveable about that, lots of americans beleive the same thing, lol show some of the republicants mumblings in congress, how about the one where the congressman was told by one of his supporters that "I am a proud american terrorist" and the congressman laughed and said great. there is film by the way.
likesspice73 1 year ago
what a stupid piece of shit government official.
dcarp001 1 year ago
The only word in the whole thing that is wrong is the last one. "amusement" He is absolutely right that Bush got people killed needlessly and ran up a huge debt to pay for doing things the wrong way. Iraq could have waited until we got Osama Bin Laden. Instead Bush let him get away. Bush closed the Prince Sultan airbase in an attempt to appease the terrorists. At this point things are so messed up that there can't be a good outcome. The best we can go for is the least bad outcome.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Do we not have some test for sanity that came remove these morons from office?
Rpfoster20 1 year ago
Hey Pete, let's not retaliate when Muslim crazyasses fly planes into our buildings and kill thousand of Americans....let's just pretend like it didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the 1993 bombing of the WTC didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the bombing of our embassy didn't happen, kind of like we pretended the USS Cole wasn't bombed...all by who? Islamic wackos, and you know what Pete? The Muslim wackos sound like you, WACKO!
klg1956 1 year ago
@klg1956 you sound like a fucking idiot.
Check out whatreallyhappened(*)com and WAKE UP.
Also search for Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
Oh, and look up,
The five dancing Israelis
The USS Liberty
Jonothan Pollard
On the other hand, you're probably a slimy Sayanim so never mind.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn "Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth" is badly misnamed. There may be some engineers involved but they would be the stupid ones. The trade center buildings fell in exactly the way that a tall structure will. Only in cartoons do they fall to the side. As soon as a building tries to lean to the side, the top must be trying to accelerate faster than the bottom. A little physics will tell you what happens next. It really was the airplane fuel that did the deed.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn AE911 is composed of 1,230 Architects and Engineers and 8,859 supporters including Architectural and Engineering Students. Your "some Engineers involved", numbers in the hundreds.
Yes, in a toppling scenario, the top not only TRIES to accelerate faster than the bottom, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS.
Look up,
the five dancing Israelis
the USS Liberty
Jonothan Pollard.
You're just another Sayanim, aren't you?
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn On the AE911 website, they list the names and license numbers of the professionals involved. So you, LIESPREADER, have an agenda to support the traitors to America that really did the crime on 911. You WILL be exposed. You better have an effective exit strategy, it won't be pretty.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Only in cartoons do two buildings, hit in different places suffer exactly the same destructive failure. In the real world, if you built two identical structures and hit them with anything, they would NOT suffer the EXACT same type of failure. A little physics says that if you weaken ONE side of a structure, with the OTHER side intact, you would have a toppling effect. ONLY if the support columns were taken out simultaneously, would you get a straight down collapse. FAIL.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn They only fall over in cartoons. Once you start a failure in that sort of building, the only option is for the mass to fall nearly straight down. Once you start the structure going down, two structures made in the same manner will fail in the same sort of way. Try stacking up piles of bricks and knocking them over and you will see the effect. If you make the stack tall enough, the bricks from the top of the stack never are the furthest from the center.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger "Once you get the structure going down" is a very telling statement. That's the point. What does it take to get steel framed buildings to collapse straight down, just like a controlled demolition?
IT TAKES A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
If it WALKS like a duck, and QUACKS like a duck ,and LOOKS like a duck,
IT'S A FREAKING DUCK !!!!!!!!!
That applies to Sayanim like you as well, of course.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn No, any failure of the structure causes the same result. It doesn't matter what starts it. The duck is quacks like is the one where it fell because the jet fuel overheated the structural iron making it to weak to hold up the weight above. This is what caused the building to come down. There was no controlled demolition. Such conspiracy theories just don't hold up in the face of the facts.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger That is the most ignorant statement possible in the light of the laws of physics. Where and to what degree the 'failure" is extremely important.
Not to mention your total lack of proper use of the language. But you're trying to come across as not too educated or intelligent, aren't you. Here's a tip, Don't overdo it, you expose yourself for who and what you are. A liar and a traitor.
I put you in the same camp as
The five dancing Israelis
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn Your statement is the ignorant one. I have pointed out the facts. You don't like the facts because they don't fit with your pet conspiracy theory. I have used proper and correct language within the 500 character limit to point out that you don't know what you are talking about. You don't like it so you question my perfectly acceptable english in an attempt to deflect the conversation away from the fact that you are supporting a nonsense claim.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
Comment removed
beneehall 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger "The duck is quacks like is the one where it fell because the jet fuel overheated the structural iron making it to weak to hold up the weight above."
============
Such errors in language have nothing to do with limits.
Tell you what. Look up, on YouTube, Kennedy Conspiracy Speech. One of the greatest presidents in America's history spoke to the press about conspiracies and secret societies. He was asking the press to help him in resisting their influence.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn It should say "the duck it" not "the duck is". I do make typographical errors from time to time but since my meaning is completely clear and easy to understand it should not be an issue. You only take issue because I point out that you are wrong in what you assert.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 The delay fromn the crash to the fall was because the remaining metal had to heat up to lose strength. Once that happened, the fall is as a building made as you correctly describe it would dictate. Once a failure starts, the building will come straight down. The upper stories fell onto the lower ones. The hit caused the next lower one to fail and the chain continues. The physics says the rest.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 Yeah, sure, the Towers had an external backbone. Try this for an education on how the Towers were built.
Sub the (*) with a period, that should work.
911research(*)wtc7(*)net/wtc/arch/core(*)html
But you know this don't you. Keep in mind, your activities in covering up this monumental crime makes you an accessory. You'd better have an exit strategy. You WILL be brought to justice.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 Talk about stupidity. You claim that the Towers had no inside structure and the outside of the building was its backbone.
In fact, THE OPPOSITE is true. The towers had a MASSIVE steel, inner backbone that would have not been easily affected by an external hit by planes.
You sir, are a LIAR. You seek to deceive those who are trying to get at the truth of 9-11.
You sir will be among the first to be rounded up when the people wake up.
Take care.
donlemedwn 19 minutes ago
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn You sir are an idiot get you facts straight and stop watching Mikey Moore movies. The buildings were designed simply for cost and as such had NO INSIDE METAL BACKBONE. You know like the Empire State, the walls were designed to be the support learn facts then we can talk and piss little boy.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheBarrett1971 Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. Like the Empire State Building??? You're comparing a design from the 30s with the Twin Towers ?
Look LOSER. At one time, slimeballs like you could lie and get away with it. Today, only a small effort will get you the TRUTH about how the Towers were built. NOTHING at all to do with the ESB, nor any other building ever made.
CONdoleeza Rice said that no one knew the Towers could be attacked in such a way.
Well, the five dancing Israelis knew.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
Comment removed
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn I went to check just to make sure. The quote "lightweight perimeter tube design" Should let you know what I found. You are talking through your hat. The WTC design was as TheBarrett1971 and I have been telling you. It wouldn't matter much really because both it and a design with an internal backbone would still have the natural property of wanting to fall straight down on its self and not over. Buildings do not fall like live trees.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Your good but not good enough. Repeated lying about the facts of the Tower's construction just won't do anymore. You KNOW that you and others claimed that the outer shell was the load bearing element in the Tower's construction. You also KNOW that this is not true, that the Towers had an internal core structure that was the actual load bearing element.
Yet you continue to lie and lie and lie.
You and Barrett are one and the same person. Don't think you're fooling anyone.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn I know that the towers were as I described them and that the fell in the manner that physics says they would. I also know that you constantly repeating your false claim[1] won't change the facts.
[1] I won't call what you say a lie because I expect that your really believe what you say. Children talk about the tooth-fairy and are not telling a lie when they do because they really believe in what they say.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Physics? So you have a degree in physics, do you? Try your theories on Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. This is composed of over a thousand, licensed Engineers and Architects with many thousands more supporters in various professions. Those include thousands of engineering and architectural students. Their numbers continue to increase.
Your description of the Tower's construction is a total fabrication, With a little digging, a search on the Net will reveal that.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn Yes physics is the science by which we understand what happens in the real world. It is the science that shows that the buildings fell in just the way that buildings of that design will fail. The buildings were built as has been explained to you and really failed as has been explained to you. That there are others who like you prefer conspiracy theories over reality doesn't make your opinions correct.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Yes, and over a thousand professional, architects and engineers are telling YOU that you have no idea as to what you are talking about. I use my own common sense AND the word of trained professionals to tell me that you are WRONG.
What is the matter with you? You are in a profound state of denial, it seems. You claim NO professional training and yet you STILL insist that you are right and that the professionals are wrong. You should get professional help, old man.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn I am willing to take the words of the millions who know what they are talking about and who give answers consistent with the laws of physics over the words of the few who have bought into the nonsense conspiracy theory claims. The buildings were constructed as you have been told and fell exactly as the laws of physics dictate. That there are others who believe the same nonsense as you does not make you right. It just makes them others who are wrong.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger So what is this organization of millions of professionals who have studied the issue and presented their findings? Do they list their names, locations and licenses? A&Efor911truth does.
You are lying about the construction of the Towers. The Nazis said that all you have to do is repeat a lie often enough and it gets to be believed. And the bigger the lie, the more effective the strategy.
Unlike the 30s, today we have online armies duking it out. Truth WILL prevail.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn Dipshit looser little kid, listen get a life and stop making shit up ok. Now go play with your doggy or something ok.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 So, "knowledge"monger starts losing the discussion and switches over to his "bad cop" personna.
The tide is turning, people are getting wise. Cease and desist now. The outrage at who really did 911 will be explosive.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn The lawyers have a saying. "When the law is against you argue the facts. When the facts are against you argue the law. When both the law and the facts are against you call the other guy names." I see that you are getting nearly that desperate and are resorting to claims of having won an argument you see yourself losing badly. You claims about the structure of the towers can disproved by any who care to use google to find the truth.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
@donlemedwn You are the one who is misrepresenting the construction of the towers. You can go look it up if you wish to know the truth.
The professionals who know the truth about the construction of the towers and how they fell fell no need to form a support group and sit around telling each other stories. They get on with the business they are in knowing that there is no need to do anything about the twin towers except perhaps build new ones.
knowledgemonger 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@donlemedwn We are not even talking about the metal structure getting weak, becuase it had no inside strucuture it was built as the outside of the building that was it's backbone and was meant to hold it up as a way to save money and speed up construction. A plane flew into the building going guess what this is so shocking, really really fast. Left a huge hole in the building and completely weakened the very thing supposed to do the supporting of the weight.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@knowledgemonger Stupidity is bliss is it not, Bush to stupid to tie his shoes but pulled this off. WOW Who knew.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 Talk about stupidity. You claim that the Towers had no inside structure and the outside of the building was its backbone.
In fact, THE OPPOSITE is true. The towers had a MASSIVE steel, inner backbone that would have not been easily affected by an external hit by planes.
You sir, are a LIAR. You seek to deceive those who are trying to get at the truth of 9-11.
You sir will be among the first to be rounded up when the people wake up.
Take care.
donlemedwn 1 year ago
@donlemedwn Gimp learn facts first and stop blogging in mom's basement. The floors were prefab and each on put on top of the other. No metal structure to hold any of it up at all just the walls as I said.
TheBarrett1971 1 year ago
@TheBarrett1971 Few people say Bush did anything. As you point out, Bush was a useful IDIOT. But who DID pull off 911?
I have no idea but, do a search for,
The five dancing Israelis,
Ask yourself, why were they CELEBRATING the hit on the Towers ?
Why did they say, on Israeli media that their "mission" was to record the event?
WHO sent them on this mission?
Why didn't those people who knew, why didn't they warn America ?
Who are YOU?
donlemedwn 1 year ago
pure evil and all due to the stupidity of the constituents within the 13th district of california
destroyALLjihadists 1 year ago
TERM LIMITS! Oh yeah FU Stark
ed2kou1 1 year ago
i think the president is not the only one who should get their heads blowed off piece of shit bastard stark..you are one hated man...the hatred in this country for you people in washington is not something you are going to want to deal with...why don't you just disappear and spare yourself some trouble..you worthless anti-american communist pig
rubearo 1 year ago
what a mean, rude, arrogant old has-been. this guy has no class, and no kindness anywhere in his soul...i bet his kids hate him...and his wife, if he still has one... is depressed...he is a vicious human being
magdamagda999 1 year ago
clinton was responsible because he had a republican congress to balance things out.
kev2m6 1 year ago
Pete Stark is a wealthy, greedy, puke that has literally lost his mind. He will NOT get my vote next time around.
sd881 1 year ago 2
donate to his opponent...i am going to! i hate this guy!
magdamagda999 1 year ago
Gee whiz folks, it’s #Piss on #CONgressman #Pete #Stark #Day. Drink up!
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
Does #CA #CONgressman #Pete #Stark #hire #illegal #immigrants to build #ladders for his ladder #company?
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago 3
Pete Stark's Personal Financial Disclosure
Net Worth
$17 - $29 million
Assets
$8-$36 million
he's up for re-election this fall and is likely to win unless we can get someone like Chris Pareja (look up his website) on the ballot. people are trying to get enough signatures to get him on the ballot by Aug 6.
Let's help defeat Pompus Pete the Progressive Parasite!
CentRLeft 1 year ago 5
This dirtbag shouldn't really be acting as if he's full of righteous anger over lies. The man traffics in them in all his dealings.
arpeggio420 1 year ago
Yes, people in California are this stupid.Glad I don't live in the next to be Greece hole.
gatekeeper96740 1 year ago
People in the San Francisco area voted in this ASSHOLE & Nancy Pelosi.....WTF are they thinking ?!?!?!?
WAKE UP SAN FRANCISCO !!!!!!!!
DONGOE 1 year ago
Gee whiz. Today is #Piss on #CONgressman #Pete #Stark Day. Drink up!
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
Right on Stark. Right on!
ijunkie 1 year ago
@ijunkie: What a fucking retard.
espada9 1 year ago
well said.
guy0307 1 year ago
Wonder if #CONgressman #Pete #Stark and #CONgressman #Etheridge are friends? Both seem prone to #violent #outburts.
UnconcernedCitizen 1 year ago
His not just mentally ill but someone that doesn't want to do their job. Maybe it time he retired and let someone that is more qualified do it.
Gruurk2 1 year ago
He's a mentally ill old man.
Roadsidepictures 1 year ago
He's an arrogant patronizsing SOB who needs to get his ass kicked and quick.
BErectus 1 year ago
This guy needs to eat a bullet. Plain and simple. EAT IT, and FINALLY DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR YOUR COUNTRY!!!! Jackass!!!!
rcvideoshooter 1 year ago
@rcvideoshooter he is doing good by reminding people that we are spending money we don't have on a war we should NEVER HAVE STARTED! we COULD spend our money to find a cure for cancer, AIDS etc. We COULD spend our money to give every child in the country medical coverage. We could spend it to give clean water to people all over the world for next to no cost, we COULD spend it on a million good things all over the world or in our own country, but the American people have chosen to spend it on war
VivaArsenal4 1 year ago
He's fine with Obama wasting more money than Bush. Horrible, bloated man.
gyrate4 1 year ago
@gyrate4 nobody wasted more money than bush. he spent more than every president in U.S. History COMBINED. you don't know what you are talking about.
john48martin 1 year ago
@john48martin Now Bill Clinton was a fiscally responsible President. But Obama quadrupled the deficit with hi "Stimulus Package" alone. He inherited Bush's mess and is outspending him too.
gyrate4 1 year ago 3
@gyrate4: CONGRESS holds the purse strings moron, how can Clinton be "fiscally responsible" when the Republicans had a MAJORITY during most of his administration? You should not be allowed to vote you are too stupid to understand the concept of a constitutional Republic.
espada9 1 year ago
@espada9 I dislike stark as much as you, and you need some manners. No need to name call. Clinton made it his goal to balance the budget and, with the republican congress, he did with a large surplus. He did this, partly, by taxing Social Security. I'd rather see them tax us much less and spend less. Get rid of the welfare culture and illegal immigration that is going to break us with their huge broods alone..
gyrate4 1 year ago
@gyrate4 Remember, that it was only a budget surplus during Clinton's admin if you DON'T factor in (or purposely omit) the tens of trillions in unfunded mandates due in the future.
If there was a Clinton surplus, how do you explain a budget DEFICIT for every year he was in office? Wouldn't a surplus mean a deficit of zero, or even a negative number?
Sorry, but the last time the US Federal Gov't was debt free was 1836. Jackson was President.
ramv36 1 year ago
@gyrate4
How could a president be fiscally responsible is Congress controls the budget of the United States?
yelvaberry 1 year ago
@yelvaberry Rhetorical question? Are you suggesting that the republican controlled congress gutted the military, and raised taxes while Clinton was in office without it being at his Urging? A President, like a Congress, can be fiscally responsible or wasteful.
gyrate4 1 year ago
@yelvaberry a president can veto any bill that comes before him...that includes spending bills...
magdamagda999 1 year ago
@gyrate4 nope..congress holds the purse strings...clinton had a fiscally conservative congress...republican-controlled
magdamagda999 1 year ago
@gyrate4 Bush's mess? How about Andrew Cuomo's mess..HUD sec 4 Clinton sued Accubanc, won 2 Billion in loans for subprime mortgages that's what started this mess in 1998; 15,000 loans that were fixed low interest, balloon after 5 yrs, no qualifying, with high interest at the end of 5 yrs and backed by Fannie/Freddie, sold to Wall Street when he knew these mortg were high risk of failure. 90% mort loans were Fannie/Freddie after that. In 2003 shit hit the fan when loans started failing.
klg1956 1 year ago 2
Finally, a video where Pete Stark doesn't look like the biggest dumbass in america.
Mr "the bigger the debt the wealthier we are" stark.....fucking dumbass.
ImInCommand 1 year ago
This guy is a total asshole. Someone should just take him out behind the woodshed and . . . well, I can't say that on youtube or it will get removed, but you know what I mean.
DaPhotoGuy 1 year ago 2
Now he loves the wars!
As long as Democrats are doing the killing of children,he loves it!
What a foolish tool.
piratesport 1 year ago 11
Stark is an amusement himself. He can't care for this country because he cares too much about himself. I'm thankful I'm not a liberal--to think like him would definitely be a curse.
RichPeru63 1 year ago
Stark is a first rate jackass! He is a freaking fool.
hdtvcamera1 1 year ago
You go Pete! End the frigging wars already! I hear talk of going into Iran? Are they insane there in Washington? How the he'll would you pay for that?
medanzig 1 year ago
@medanzig That's obama though, so he's all for that.
gyrate4 1 year ago
so now they are in Aphganistan! More double speak!
robinsurfs 1 year ago
What a a-hole. Well is o