I am sorry Lou had heat with Bruno, my favorite all time wrestler; but Thesz is to be respected for his skill and the greatness of his career; I guess Don Vinnie could not fit in him before Refrigerator Perry, "Roulette" Pete Rose, Drew Carey, etc.
Thesz loved those arm locks especially the dreaded double wrist lock.
Lou Thesz could've easily won the championship if the match were a shoot. Unlike Hulk Hogan, Thesz really knew how to wrestle and inflict pain in a split second.
But it was pre-determined that the match would be won by Kiniski and, besides, Thesz was already in his early 50s and past his prime and wouldn't have withstood the rigors of being constantly on the road while he's the champion, which is probably why Thesz allowed Kiniski to beat him for the NWA title a year earlier.
I use to watch Mr. Kiniski wrestle at the old Kiel in St. Louis, I would cheer for him.. It drove my grandmother crazy LOL!! R. I. P. BIG THUNDER!!!! You were my favorite!!
not only were there move, but they connected into high spots that made sense, instead of todays spotfests. i know everybody thinks everything that iis old is better, but here its truly the case
As to any and everyone out there who as posted that these guys were flabby I might point out that they were real men not steroid injecting freaks and by the way muscle guys could not wrestle like this match
Why were athletes so flabby up until like the early 1980s? Don't say steroids, as they were around for a long time, tho they didn't Really get into wrestling until the WWF boomed, but very few men were chiselled and cut until the mid 80s, most were just flabby and gross (yet still tough) Was it because of new weight training techniques? Or an evolution of man right before our eyes?
"Flabby" may be a bit of an over-statement. No doubt men such as Don Leo Jonathan and Kiniski were near as strong as the pros today, and some such as Superstar Graham and Edouard Carpentier were nearly as 'cut.'. Wrestlers did not place as heavy an emphasis on physique training, and YES steroids did gain greater prominence once physique took centre stage. Read Harley Race's autobio as well as Dynamite's for some good insight on this.
Well, I'd Love to read Dynamites, I had no idea Harley had one, and I've been dying to read Lou Thesz' Hooker bio, as you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who devours literature on the inside of the wrestling business as fast and feverishly as me. but all of these books are out of print and are extremely expensive :( I wish someone would scan them into PDF format for the rest of us, or the unlikely event of 2nd printings...
Because before wrestling, it wasn't about looking good or physically appealing; it was about being a good wrestler. Looks were on the bottom of the priority list.
i agree! wrestling back then was a sport rather than entertainment like today. if you notice back then wrestlers were middle aged men with hairy chests and average bodies, like ur average joe. today its all about pretty boys puttin on a show.
They were wrestlers, not bodybuilders. Having huge muscles can limit your movement in the ring, especially when doing intricate moves/holds like Thesz and Kiniski.
That's why most of today's wrestlers are awful when compared to these guys -- they're too bulked up to have much mobility. And they weren't flabby. Thesz, for example, was built very athletically in his prime, but by 1967, Lou Thesz had been in the biz for over 30 years. He was pretty damn old by that point. Of course, he's not going to be built like he was in his younger days.
There's nothing awkward about the movements. They moved more realistically, so that it wouldn't look choreographed. Today's wrestling looks more like ballet and gymnastics than an actual wrestling match. No believability at all.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It looks very awkward. It's very stiff (by that I don't mean..like a shoot) and slow. I feel like I should be listening to Crowbar while watching this. Sometimes old wrestling even looks like vintage gay porn or something.
I'll post your side of the argument now: They're telling a story (it doesn't take a rocket scientist to convey a wrestling story), ring psychology (same as the story bit), new wrestling sucks, high flying sucks, etc etc etc blah blah blah.
Well, if it's not rocket science, why is it that so few wrestlers now can actually tella good story or use ring psychology? Why is it that when they get hurt but have a comeback a few seconds later, they appear to be magically all better? Do you really think the new guys are good? A few are, most of them are terrible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There's NO STORY to tell. Guys beat the shit out of each other. It's not like they're freaking Stephen King or whatever.
I know what you mean about the lack of selling (see Samoa Joe and Batista)
I like guys from ROH and a lot of the WWE midcard and such. Some guys in TNA are good. I don't care how about how good they are or how they can "work", as long as I'm ENTERTAINED. This old bullshit doesn't entertain me. If this old stuff is sooo good, how come this style isn't selling ppvs?
There IS a story to tell. Or there SHOULD be. "Two guys beating each other up" gets repetitious if nobody cares about what's happening in the ring. And how can they care about crap that looks like a Hollywood fight scene? Hell, they talk more than they wrstle. The new bullshit is unentertaining as hell to me. As for your question, it's because the target audience nowadays has the attention span of gnats, by and large.
This was another fix. Thesz pinned Kiniski and they give Kiniski back his belt. Goes to show you it doesn't matter who really wins, the winner is who the owners say won.
This is obviously clipped, but I must say this is wrestling greatness. They're so far ahead of their time that I believe the space-time continuum will never be the same.
I had the privilege to see these two fight for the title in Orlando Fl. around 68 or 69. Great times. I thank both men for the memories.
attra91 1 week ago
I am sorry Lou had heat with Bruno, my favorite all time wrestler; but Thesz is to be respected for his skill and the greatness of his career; I guess Don Vinnie could not fit in him before Refrigerator Perry, "Roulette" Pete Rose, Drew Carey, etc.
Thesz loved those arm locks especially the dreaded double wrist lock.
RPenta 3 months ago
Lou Thesz could've easily won the championship if the match were a shoot. Unlike Hulk Hogan, Thesz really knew how to wrestle and inflict pain in a split second.
But it was pre-determined that the match would be won by Kiniski and, besides, Thesz was already in his early 50s and past his prime and wouldn't have withstood the rigors of being constantly on the road while he's the champion, which is probably why Thesz allowed Kiniski to beat him for the NWA title a year earlier.
harley55100 5 months ago
Gene Kiniski was the NWA World's Heavyweight Champion on March 26, 1966.
mkl62 10 months ago
We will miss "Canada's greatest athlete". Man...hearing of his passing really hit me...wrestling is losing some great ones lately.
ZenPimps 1 year ago
When wrestling was actually wrestling
WrestlingFan1637 1 year ago
I use to watch Mr. Kiniski wrestle at the old Kiel in St. Louis, I would cheer for him.. It drove my grandmother crazy LOL!! R. I. P. BIG THUNDER!!!! You were my favorite!!
toicannon 1 year ago
I was privileged to see these two go at in Orlando Florida around 1967 or 68. Great times. All of it has changed now, for the worse.
attra91 1 year ago
R.I.P Gene Kiniski
kingp05 1 year ago
rip gene
jobber25v 1 year ago
Wow, the way Lou did the head scissors takedown you'd think other guys would use that move.
86lenny 1 year ago
not only were there move, but they connected into high spots that made sense, instead of todays spotfests. i know everybody thinks everything that iis old is better, but here its truly the case
32alltheway 2 years ago
Thanks so much for posting this excellent footage. A privilege to watch these legends work.
topeconqueso 2 years ago
This is pure wrestling at its best. The only guys who could work a match like this today are Kurt Angle and Bryan Danielson.
RSXemperor 2 years ago
I was the biggest fan of Lou Thesz growing up. I remember watching this match. This is back when wrestling was wrestling.
sheilaeat 2 years ago
As to any and everyone out there who as posted that these guys were flabby I might point out that they were real men not steroid injecting freaks and by the way muscle guys could not wrestle like this match
thunderbare 2 years ago
Why were athletes so flabby up until like the early 1980s? Don't say steroids, as they were around for a long time, tho they didn't Really get into wrestling until the WWF boomed, but very few men were chiselled and cut until the mid 80s, most were just flabby and gross (yet still tough) Was it because of new weight training techniques? Or an evolution of man right before our eyes?
rattlehead1999 2 years ago
"Flabby" may be a bit of an over-statement. No doubt men such as Don Leo Jonathan and Kiniski were near as strong as the pros today, and some such as Superstar Graham and Edouard Carpentier were nearly as 'cut.'. Wrestlers did not place as heavy an emphasis on physique training, and YES steroids did gain greater prominence once physique took centre stage. Read Harley Race's autobio as well as Dynamite's for some good insight on this.
cnhatton 2 years ago
Well, I'd Love to read Dynamites, I had no idea Harley had one, and I've been dying to read Lou Thesz' Hooker bio, as you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who devours literature on the inside of the wrestling business as fast and feverishly as me. but all of these books are out of print and are extremely expensive :( I wish someone would scan them into PDF format for the rest of us, or the unlikely event of 2nd printings...
rattlehead1999 2 years ago
You should really look up "Hooker" by Lou Thesz. It's easily my favorite wrestling-related book.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago
Because before wrestling, it wasn't about looking good or physically appealing; it was about being a good wrestler. Looks were on the bottom of the priority list.
Sanguiluna 2 years ago
i agree! wrestling back then was a sport rather than entertainment like today. if you notice back then wrestlers were middle aged men with hairy chests and average bodies, like ur average joe. today its all about pretty boys puttin on a show.
youdude1121 2 years ago
They were wrestlers, not bodybuilders. Having huge muscles can limit your movement in the ring, especially when doing intricate moves/holds like Thesz and Kiniski.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago
(continued)
That's why most of today's wrestlers are awful when compared to these guys -- they're too bulked up to have much mobility. And they weren't flabby. Thesz, for example, was built very athletically in his prime, but by 1967, Lou Thesz had been in the biz for over 30 years. He was pretty damn old by that point. Of course, he's not going to be built like he was in his younger days.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago
that was the best sell of a drop toe-hold ive ever seen. increidble attention 2 detail
andycf87 2 years ago
Fatty Jigglefest 67
Their movements are sooo awkward.
MidgetMassacre 2 years ago
There's nothing awkward about the movements. They moved more realistically, so that it wouldn't look choreographed. Today's wrestling looks more like ballet and gymnastics than an actual wrestling match. No believability at all.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It looks very awkward. It's very stiff (by that I don't mean..like a shoot) and slow. I feel like I should be listening to Crowbar while watching this. Sometimes old wrestling even looks like vintage gay porn or something.
I'll post your side of the argument now: They're telling a story (it doesn't take a rocket scientist to convey a wrestling story), ring psychology (same as the story bit), new wrestling sucks, high flying sucks, etc etc etc blah blah blah.
MidgetMassacre 2 years ago
Well, if it's not rocket science, why is it that so few wrestlers now can actually tella good story or use ring psychology? Why is it that when they get hurt but have a comeback a few seconds later, they appear to be magically all better? Do you really think the new guys are good? A few are, most of them are terrible.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There's NO STORY to tell. Guys beat the shit out of each other. It's not like they're freaking Stephen King or whatever.
I know what you mean about the lack of selling (see Samoa Joe and Batista)
I like guys from ROH and a lot of the WWE midcard and such. Some guys in TNA are good. I don't care how about how good they are or how they can "work", as long as I'm ENTERTAINED. This old bullshit doesn't entertain me. If this old stuff is sooo good, how come this style isn't selling ppvs?
MidgetMassacre 2 years ago
There IS a story to tell. Or there SHOULD be. "Two guys beating each other up" gets repetitious if nobody cares about what's happening in the ring. And how can they care about crap that looks like a Hollywood fight scene? Hell, they talk more than they wrstle. The new bullshit is unentertaining as hell to me. As for your question, it's because the target audience nowadays has the attention span of gnats, by and large.
CynthiaCM 2 years ago
some great scissoring going on
southernaussie 2 years ago 4
Oh yeah! Scissor me! Scissor me timbers
rattlehead1999 2 years ago
This was another fix. Thesz pinned Kiniski and they give Kiniski back his belt. Goes to show you it doesn't matter who really wins, the winner is who the owners say won.
TonySpargo 2 years ago
Lou Thez was for real not many had the in ring skill he did. todays so called wrestlers would have no clue of what to do in the ring with him lol
humanfly02 2 years ago 5
Lou last of the real hookers
thunderbare 2 years ago
@humanfly02 Not at all. He would take them to school.
CadillacL 1 year ago
@humanfly02 tap out? as far as I know Thesz was an expert in Catch Wrestling
exe2517 1 year ago
..was a 'neck-breaker' illegal back then?
Howcum Thesz was D. Q.'ed?
var68 2 years ago
this is true wrestling
bestao3 3 years ago
Hi RagingBull1935
Do you have any clips of GeneKiniski being interivewd by Ron Morrier in the early 1970's?
I saw GK wrestle in the early 1970's. Good stuff.
envaneo 3 years ago
How did Thesz lose this match?
var68 3 years ago
He "lost" because you're a mark.
alexglauer 2 years ago 3
lou thesz is my grand father
skyeagle31 3 years ago
Gen Kiniski not won the title in 1967, was in 1966
conbusken2007 3 years ago 2
This is obviously clipped, but I must say this is wrestling greatness. They're so far ahead of their time that I believe the space-time continuum will never be the same.
WrestlingFollower 3 years ago
Sorry KenViewer, i accidentally delete your post.
Anyway this is a later match, Thesz lost the title in '66
RagingBull1935 3 years ago
Thank you, still again, for posting this classic, rare footage. Thank you.
KenViewer 3 years ago