@azar783402 And a 767 has plowed through what other building???
Oh yeah like NONE!! Sorry but where is the precedent for Sept 11th? There is none.
So how do you make these claims that never before in history blah blah....
The only stupid and ignorant idiot here is you my friend. Its not me. I am on terra firma. You are off in the clouds of some fantasy scenario that just never ends and has a million different variations.
@redsunflower67 They reported hearing explosions. No firefighter reported bombs. The word "explosions" does not always mean bombs. There were numerous exploding cars, and gas lines. The floors pancaking down on each other made sounds similar to how an explosion would sound.
And yes, if bombs were used, they would have to have been silent invisabombs because the collapse sounded absolutely nothing like a demolition, and no bomb pieces were ever found in the rubble.
@MrRccx Cyber bullying is not a thing that should be taken lightly, he just said it looks familiar and you just told him to die...... do you know that some people commit suicide JUST because one person had to tell him to die
@priyasworld2001 maybe becouse they wanted the building to collapsed... didnt u see that there were bombs inside.. maybe the building is old. and they want to put it down d;
@MazJax Yes, I am a lunatic conspiracy theorist. ;) But I don't think ole Larry knew the meaning of the word "pull it" either. "Pull the firefighters out" makes no sense either.
The operation was to send firefighters to put out the fires in the building. Seeing as the fires were too strong, and the building showed severe structural damage 7 hours before collapse, no firefighting was done, and the operation had to be pulled. Therefore the firefighters had to be taken out
Also, think about it. If this were some super-secret James-Bond-esque conspiracy, why would Silverstein mention pulling at all?
@MazJax He mentioned it 'cause he's a moron like the rest of them and assume ALL Americans are morons. I saw that video of him saying "pull it" only yesterday, ten years after the event. Most Americans never saw it nor did they put 2 and 2 together. Luckily SOME of us aren't not morons and actually believe our own eyes when we see things. 9/11 being an inside job has exited the realm of theory and is solidly in the realm of possibility and even probability.
@paulineprojectlove I'm sure millions of non-twoof scientists and structural engineers have seen that video too. It doesn't matter anyway because those scientist are all morons, right? You guys must know so much better than they do. Hell, even the WTC's designer, who calls the theories jokes, is also a moron, right?
Silverstein talked about the FDNY's order to pull the firefighters from the building. One of the biggest real estate investors in the world is a big ol' moron, isn't he?
@paulineprojectlove Let's all listen to professional paranoiac Alex Jones! He sure isn't a moron! What about Judy "Death Ray from Space" Wood? She's so smart!
Steven "Thermite cutter" Jones? So much smarter than actual construction workers who use thermite daily! (Who all disagree with him, by the way, but what do we care, anyone who isn't a twoofer is a moron, right?)
Also, why would he let his own buildings get destroyed? It cost 7 billion of his money to clean up, and he barely made 4 billion in insurance, so technically he lost 3 billion dollars by having his buildings destroyed. Why would anybody in their right mind destroy their own buildings if it would mean they lose 3 billion dollars? For no reason?
@SuperDrSmart Sorry. He didn't make a penny for the collapse of the towers. The government sure helped pay, but Silverstein, without a doubt lost at least 3 billion. And he himself has to pay a crapload for the new WTC now, so if it WAS a conspiracy, he would have gotten himself screwed over big time.
The truthers should believe their own eyes, not what Alex Jones told them. They should really use their common sense. Look at all the scientific evidence against the theories that they blissfully ignore!
@MazJax Truthers go by facts thats why they don't believe the official version. Idiots believe what they are told by the media so of course they believe the "official" version which makes no sense and fails all critisism hence why it avoids questions and avoids detail just like the NIST report!
@galaxything I don't believe the media. I believe the millions of scientists that disagree with the conspiracy theories. Or are all these scientists paid off? XD
Many government conspiracies have been exposed within months of occurence! Yet your 911 twoof movement has proven squat since the last DECADE!
@MazJax Actually look who the studdies are funded by and you will see why the scientists stick to the official story. Or like NIST's computer model collapse which is a total laughable joke. Or may be they are as stupid and gullible as you! youtube.com/watch?v=y24_hSFRM3M&feature=related demo charges = inside job, wake up idiot!
@galaxything Where do you think the government gets information from? The scientists. They are paid to study. If you are gullible enough to believe that massive fires DIDN'T buckle the steel, but instead it was silent invisa-bombs that don't shoot debris and that were SECRETLY and cleanly planted by the government in front of 40,000 WTC employees as well as 10 dump trucks worth of thermite secretly carried up the elevators and stairs, hidden in the burned floors, then that's your own stupidity.
@galaxything Where do you think the government gets information from? The scientists. They are paid to study. If you are gullible enough to believe that massive fires DIDN'T buckle the steel, but instead it was silent invisa-bombs that don't shoot debris and that were SECRETLY and cleanly planted by the government in front of 40,000 WTC employees as well as 10 dump trucks worth of thermite secretly carried up the elevators and stairs, hidden in the burned floors, then that's your own stupidity
@galaxything Yeah, why bother actually reading the NIST report, written by scientists, and realizing it has no unanswered questions, when you can listen to professional paranoiac Alex Jones? You must be so much smarter than the millions of non-twoof scientists. Forget the WTC designer, Les Robertson who laughs at the theories. He's dumb and you are all geniuses compared to the dum ol' National Institute of Standards and Technology. They are paid off and take science out their ass, don't they?
@MazJax Dude plssss do some research, the data was incomplete, didn't follow what actually happened and avoided all questions it couldn't answer with out giving it away, the NIST models are a joke and don't resemble the collapses... A few scattered fires un-even in only a few floors cannot corse a total global fail perfectly even and symetrical on all steel supports at the same time. The fact that small pieces of undetonated thermite / thermate are found throughout the dust suggests.....
@galaxything Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes? You must know so much better than they do, huh? Stop the fucking presses, Internet youtube dwellers are now smarter than scientists with phDs.
Few unscattered fires..tell that to the wtc collapse survivors.
All steel supports at the same time...I thought South Tower fell leaned to one side first while collapsing?
@MazJax Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes
Is that a fact?? (LOL!!). Well i suggest you take the time to look the NIST video and B7 video side by side. There is an excellent video on line showing just that. I think you will find they match up
@roquefortfiles Nist models the interior activity in the building. The interior floors collapsed from fires, especially on the east side. This is proven from the videos of WTC7, where you can see the penthouse on the roof collapsing due to the failed floors below it. The nearly hollow shell of the building easily collapsed later.
Can you show me your many years of intensive, first-hand research on the collapse, ratified by top scientists, and your own detailed model based on video proof?
@galaxything Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes? You must know so much better than they do, huh? Stop the fucking presses, Internet youtube dwellers are now smarter than scientists with phDs.
Few unscattered fires..tell that to the wtc collapse survivors.
All steel supports at the same time...I thought South Tower fell leaned to one side first while collapsing.?
@galaxything Nist Models are a joke,eh? The models made my a team of scientific experts from around the world who studied the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes, huh? You know so much better than they do, don't you? Stop the fucking presses. Youtubers are now smarter than scientists with phDs. What a relief it is to know that you guys are the future investigators for all the world's scientific problems. Screw the harvard professors that study first hand.
@galaxything Few unscattered fires?? Is that what lost change told you? Hah. Please, try this: Tell that to a WTC collapse survivor, who is probably mentally and physically scarred for life by the fires and carnage, and see if you don't get a punch in the face. Also tell that to the firefighters.
"perfectly even" good god, you're resorting to straw-men? If these were "perfectly even" then why did the top bit of the south tower nearly tip over? And why did the core/antenna on tower 1 lean south?
LOL!! You're so out of it on this you really have no clue. Just for your info Building 7 was on fire top to bottom by the time it collapsed.
And another FYI. Thermite is not a material that anyone would use for a CD. Call up a demo company and tell them you'd like them to use it for your next CD..
@roquefortfiles you can see building 7 all the way up untill it falls and you can clearly see only a few fires through the windows of some floor! That does not cause global syncronised collapse! Thermite is a cutting tool perfect for not having too many loud explosions as it is silent based on that why would a demo company use it? lol idiot! see "Video of Shanghai skyscraper inferno as 53 killed in China fire" video and many other buildings that burned for days like a giant torch and NEVER fell
@galaxything Many conspiracy theorists point to the widely shown North side of WTC7 where there is not much visible damage. But the WTC south side is the side you want to look at. It was the damaged side, closer to WTC. It was bellowing thick smoke, and burning hard from the damage caused to it.
The skyscraper in china was much better designed for withstanding fires, and it wasn't heavily damaged with 25% of it scooped out, unlike WTC7.
@MazJax so your telling all buildings in history that have burned like the one in china and worse were all better made lol? Also the damage you speak of is BS you can see wtc 7 from all angles in various videos. If you really wan't to see damage check wtc 5/6 that stood near the base of the towers.. smashed in half literally! They had to be demolished as the remaining structure is still strong! Seems no one has any logic or common sense these days!
WTC7 was built in an economic recession in the 80's. It couldn't afford to have a great design. And yes, many of those buildings WERE better made. Any net design (many interior columns) is more structurally durable than the WTC's tube design (columns only in core and perimeter walls). And the WTC was actually heavily damaged before the fires took their toll, unlike the China tower.
Uhh, you can check any video and it points out the damage. Just search up "south side damage wtc7"
@galaxything WTC 5 and 6 had complete floor collapses, many from fires themselves.
/watch?v=eWpOfUMz6SE
There was really not much left except for the outer walls, which were easily supported because they had many more support beams. Also, WTC5 and 6 were much shorter, meaning there was less weight to trigger a full collapse.
@roquefortfiles Also it is a FACT 100% proof that chips of undetonated thermite is found in the dust in very large amounts, it is even the focal point for scientists and engineers who are trying to get a reinvestigation based on this fact. That alone says it all and no one can argue that.
@galaxything Great, wonderful. Are you aware that it is not a material that anyone would EVER use for a CD? It requires high explosives. Go and ask a Professional yourself. Silly story entirely
The "TM" erected a steel sign at Burning Man in Nevada protesting for a new investigation. They were going to melt the sign in half with Thermite on either end.
@roquefortfiles lol man! I am telling you it is a fact thermite is found in the dust and there is other clear evidence that therite reactions took place such as the by product of thermite reactions also found at the site. Also the guys that did that test fail! On a british tv science show they melted through a car bonnet all the wat down through the engine until it came out the bottom using thermite, the video is even on youtube.
@galaxything LOL man i am telling you!!!. Thermite is not a material that would EVER be used by a professional demolition team. It wouldn't happen my friend! It requires high explosives plain and simple.
The "TM" erected a metal posted sign at Burning Man in Nevada with "TRUTH" strung between it. They were going to melt it apart with Thermite to hilite the cause of "911 Truth" Even got Steven Jones to help out.
@roquefortfiles I know it wouldn't be used by demo companies, why would it? But in the case of bringing down a building in plain sight and you want it to be a "secret demolition" then thermite is perfect, it is slower and you can weaken the structure and not need as many explosives it is also quite. And again it is a FACT thermite is in all the wtc dust in large amounts.
@galaxything No it's not a FACT. That is bullshit. There are also some KEY chemical signatures that MUST be present for Thermite. And they are not there. Which pretty much renders Jones story complete bullshit.
But he quietly doesn't like to talk about that point.
@roquefortfiles OMG now I know your talking shit! Yes it is FACT do some fucking research! ACTUAL undetonated thermite!!!!! as well as the chemical by products of thermite reactions! You can even see it working in some videos although idiots like you say it could be something else.. But there is no dispute over the rest of the evidence. Your inability to research fully unhindered by your stubbornness and ego does not change the facts!
@galaxything Time to ring up the common sense bell. The WTC is an acre across. If you seriously think a space this large supported by 47 HUGE interior columns and 230 exterior columns is going to be miraculously disassembled by a few buckets full of Thermite, or conversely!! 2 Dump trucks full of thermite.
You are on crack my friend!! And if you think this is going to take place and it is ONLY going to result in dusty wisps "undetonated" Thermite.
@roquefortfiles A phew buckets of thermite? try several tons of it and placed at the right locations along with explosives. It's funny how you don't think thermite can cause collapse but you think fire can lol?? And if you wan't to talk logic then Newtons laws of falling bodies say that your the with with the illogical view! Again, fact, thermite found in the dust in amounts that must of been in the tons. I suppose you think thermite is a normal material to be found in the rubble of buildings.
@galaxything Jones claims to have found traces of thermate on a piece of steel from the WTC. This claim is unsubstantiated. First, Jones does not cite the chemical composition of actual spent thermate signatures, for comparison. Second, Jones has not provided a chain of custody for the steel he tested that would preclude its contamination by other sources. Third, and most importantly, there is nothing unexpected about finding sulfur and trace metals on WTC steel and dust samples.
@roquefortfiles Who gives a shit about Jones. I am talking about scientists and scientific data, who the hell is Jones anyway lol? And as well I don't know what you are talking about, clearly have not done much research into this as you only cite "Jones" and talk of sulfur. The chemical by-products from thermite reactions are unique to such reactions and produce a type of metal not used in construction and in it's forms. Also the undetonated thermite found was high quality military grade!
@galaxything Well i have to thank you for walking straight in to that trap. Several tons you say?
Lets examine!! 244 ext columns 47 Int columns. Lets half that to be nice. 145. What say 200 pounds of Thermite per column? Gives us 29,000 pounds of thermite. Or 14.5 Tons of this material in the building. Visual terms think of a tandem dump truck full of this material.
If you believe this you got a few screws loose.
If you believe 14 tons ends up as a few particles?
@roquefortfiles Actually your quite right. The estimation for the amount of thermite used was about 10 tons but the scientist in question said he wouldn't be surprised if it was 100 tons. This makes sense when you here the employees of the wtc centre saying that for months leading up to the attacks teams of workers were bringing in a lot of equipment, materials on large trollys and trailers and construction work was going on on closed floors and elivators for months.. They were sick of the dust.
@galaxything LOL!!! Shut up!! like just shut up!!. Dude. The WTC has independent security for every tenant. You don't just waltz in to the building with 14 tons worth of Thermite...
"Dum de dum...ooh well just back up the truck to the front door Jim and we'll secretly unload this here THERMITE"..
@roquefortfiles Derp! The security was of course involved in it you idiot! If you researched you would see that every that worked there couldn't understand the strange behavior of the security, look into it and you will see! Also look on the board of directors for the company in charge of security hmm..... Security removed and removed at odd times, sniffer dogs removed, security systems shut down for long periods of time and so on.. Research is your freind!
So's a brain!! Its not a material anyone would use for a CD. There is no professional in existence who would ever use this to take down a building. Research is your friend?? tell you what. Go call up a demolition company and tell them you would like them to use... THERMITE to implode your building.
Then wait for the laughter. Because that is what you'd get.
@roquefortfiles Demolition companies don't use thermite idiot! seriously why would they, they are not trying to be secretive. It is amazing how the laws of physics, Newtons laws all go out the window!
@roquefortfiles Ill say again, Your fail to understand how such a thing could be carried out does not mean it didn't happen! That is called being naive and ignorant :D
@roquefortfiles Informed? When fail to see overwhelming evidence much of which is common sense. Intelligence when fail to understand physics and the basic laws of Newton, gravity, falling bodies and resistance.. What you are is naive ignorant and gullible and there is even a saying "gullible minds are immune to facts" You just sit there defending the people that attack us to blame it on the people who's countries they wish to invade.
@roquefortfiles Again I find it funny how just because you fail to understand how it could be done, you fail to believe it happened. Naive, ignorant and gullible. You are everything that is wrong with the world you sheep dumb fuck! If it wasn't for people like you making excuses for the people that do shit like this then the world would be a better place!
@MazJax Also you can see that the second tower was a top down demolition. In other words it was destroyed from the top down, there was NOTHING above the zone of destruction so what was exploding it from the top down.. the upper floors?? what upper floors lol it was blowing up from the TOP down! watch the video named WTC NORTH TOWER EXPLODING, David Chandler, AE911truth. o r g and you will see for yourself!
@galaxything Exploding from the top down?? What? Have you even heard of gravitational potential energy? If the support beams are weakened, and the load becomes too great, the load collapses. This is exactly what happened on 911. Not silent invisa-bombs.
@knutn lol durpy durp typical response from a brainwashed idiot. Ignore Newtons laws of physics / gravity it's just all wrong ha? ;) Hope you enjoy life in the NWO m8!
@MrRccx My comment was not a joke. And saying a comment like "People like you should die" is a death threat and Cyber bullying.. Youtube doesn't take Cyber Bullying lightly. Al i said was:"Wow that looks familiar!" And you had to wish death upon me? Sorry but i reported you to Youtube. I feel i should stop as many people like you who wish death on someone. Have you ever thought that there might be a weak person with no will to live on here? Andjustfollowyourdirection? sad very sad.
Goddamn 9/11 flame arguments raging below me.
But anyway, that was cool.
DreamCarv3r 1 month ago
You are sick comment below. Go
Back to what ever hole you crawled out of.
milkwhitedark 1 month ago
is that actualy real ?
cooldude2511 2 months ago
@cooldude2511 that was a rehearsal to 9/11 ;)
ukrainesov21 1 month ago
That is not WTC6 it was the same size but people didn't cheer after it fell. Also there were explosives going off one by one.
bobzilla441 2 months ago
Is that WTC building 6?
thatsexyman 3 months ago
@azar783402 And a 767 has plowed through what other building???
Oh yeah like NONE!! Sorry but where is the precedent for Sept 11th? There is none.
So how do you make these claims that never before in history blah blah....
The only stupid and ignorant idiot here is you my friend. Its not me. I am on terra firma. You are off in the clouds of some fantasy scenario that just never ends and has a million different variations.
You need to look at what you say and write.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@redsunflower67 They reported hearing explosions. No firefighter reported bombs. The word "explosions" does not always mean bombs. There were numerous exploding cars, and gas lines. The floors pancaking down on each other made sounds similar to how an explosion would sound.
And yes, if bombs were used, they would have to have been silent invisabombs because the collapse sounded absolutely nothing like a demolition, and no bomb pieces were ever found in the rubble.
Perfect condition, eh? Pffthah!
MazJax 4 months ago 2
fake
Misterluckydumbo 5 months ago
9/11 all over again!
paulineprojectlove 5 months ago
ummm ????
nunnster1999 6 months ago
this implison fails! > /watch?v=N8RFUfmt5Xo
guitarbowest 6 months ago
human like destruction
azndragonx2 6 months ago
IT'S REAL WOW, SO DON'T THINK IT'S "FAKE AND GAY"
Centaurian0190 8 months ago
Made in China
Southpark124 8 months ago
if its fake then I'm really impressed, if its real AWESOME
TheRebelempirefilms 8 months ago
FAKE AND GAY!
AllHopeIsGone381 8 months ago
@AllHopeIsGone381 your fake and gay
unknwnZERO 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@matthmatthmatth Excuse me? I was defending a person and now you're calling me a troll??? (What does troll mean?)
kiettram4869 9 months ago
@MrRccx Cyber bullying is not a thing that should be taken lightly, he just said it looks familiar and you just told him to die...... do you know that some people commit suicide JUST because one person had to tell him to die
kiettram4869 9 months ago
@kiettram4869 Did you know that NO ONE GIVES A FUCK SO SHUT THE FUCK UP TROLL
matthmatthmatth 9 months ago
fake
cpearson96 9 months ago
@cpearson96 ...No. It's not. Shhh.
Mattt8D 9 months ago
@cpearson96 this is not FAKE.....this is called.... demolition!!!
XxjoshthedragracerxX 6 months ago
Why were people clapping?
priyasworld2001 11 months ago
@priyasworld2001 maybe becouse they wanted the building to collapsed... didnt u see that there were bombs inside.. maybe the building is old. and they want to put it down d;
darkzone1432 11 months ago
@darkzone1432 year I think your right!!
priyasworld2001 11 months ago
Can someone please let me know whats happening here apart from the obvious fact that, that building just collapsed?
Hayleighcookie 1 year ago
9/11 right there
GuyMagicFingers 1 year ago
Chuck Norris kicked the building to make it fall
minigun67 1 year ago
@minigun67 No, Larry Silvserstein said pull it, and he watched as the building collapsed.
SuperDrSmart 1 year ago
@SuperDrSmart
Silverstein said pull the firefighters.
"Pulling," in demolition terms, means to pull a building down using cables. This is what they did with the remnants of WTC4,5 and 6.
Are you conspiracy theorists confused over the meaning of this word?
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Yes, I am a lunatic conspiracy theorist. ;) But I don't think ole Larry knew the meaning of the word "pull it" either. "Pull the firefighters out" makes no sense either.
SuperDrSmart 5 months ago
@SuperDrSmart
"Pull the operation" (his words)
This phrase makes sense.
The operation was to send firefighters to put out the fires in the building. Seeing as the fires were too strong, and the building showed severe structural damage 7 hours before collapse, no firefighting was done, and the operation had to be pulled. Therefore the firefighters had to be taken out
Also, think about it. If this were some super-secret James-Bond-esque conspiracy, why would Silverstein mention pulling at all?
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax He mentioned it 'cause he's a moron like the rest of them and assume ALL Americans are morons. I saw that video of him saying "pull it" only yesterday, ten years after the event. Most Americans never saw it nor did they put 2 and 2 together. Luckily SOME of us aren't not morons and actually believe our own eyes when we see things. 9/11 being an inside job has exited the realm of theory and is solidly in the realm of possibility and even probability.
paulineprojectlove 5 months ago
@paulineprojectlove I'm sure millions of non-twoof scientists and structural engineers have seen that video too. It doesn't matter anyway because those scientist are all morons, right? You guys must know so much better than they do. Hell, even the WTC's designer, who calls the theories jokes, is also a moron, right?
Silverstein talked about the FDNY's order to pull the firefighters from the building. One of the biggest real estate investors in the world is a big ol' moron, isn't he?
MazJax 5 months ago
@paulineprojectlove Let's all listen to professional paranoiac Alex Jones! He sure isn't a moron! What about Judy "Death Ray from Space" Wood? She's so smart!
Steven "Thermite cutter" Jones? So much smarter than actual construction workers who use thermite daily! (Who all disagree with him, by the way, but what do we care, anyone who isn't a twoofer is a moron, right?)
MazJax 5 months ago
Also, why would he let his own buildings get destroyed? It cost 7 billion of his money to clean up, and he barely made 4 billion in insurance, so technically he lost 3 billion dollars by having his buildings destroyed. Why would anybody in their right mind destroy their own buildings if it would mean they lose 3 billion dollars? For no reason?
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Where did you get that information? His insurance/the government covered the clean up costs. He made billions.
SuperDrSmart 5 months ago
@SuperDrSmart Sorry. He didn't make a penny for the collapse of the towers. The government sure helped pay, but Silverstein, without a doubt lost at least 3 billion. And he himself has to pay a crapload for the new WTC now, so if it WAS a conspiracy, he would have gotten himself screwed over big time.
MazJax 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MazJax Can you back up your claim with some citations?
SuperDrSmart 5 months ago
@MazJax Believe your own eyes, not what people tell you. Use your common sense. Look! The truth is right in front of you.
paulineprojectlove 5 months ago
@paulineprojectlove
The truthers should believe their own eyes, not what Alex Jones told them. They should really use their common sense. Look at all the scientific evidence against the theories that they blissfully ignore!
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Truthers go by facts thats why they don't believe the official version. Idiots believe what they are told by the media so of course they believe the "official" version which makes no sense and fails all critisism hence why it avoids questions and avoids detail just like the NIST report!
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything I don't believe the media. I believe the millions of scientists that disagree with the conspiracy theories. Or are all these scientists paid off? XD
Many government conspiracies have been exposed within months of occurence! Yet your 911 twoof movement has proven squat since the last DECADE!
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Actually look who the studdies are funded by and you will see why the scientists stick to the official story. Or like NIST's computer model collapse which is a total laughable joke. Or may be they are as stupid and gullible as you! youtube.com/watch?v=y24_hSFRM3M&feature=related demo charges = inside job, wake up idiot!
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything Where do you think the government gets information from? The scientists. They are paid to study. If you are gullible enough to believe that massive fires DIDN'T buckle the steel, but instead it was silent invisa-bombs that don't shoot debris and that were SECRETLY and cleanly planted by the government in front of 40,000 WTC employees as well as 10 dump trucks worth of thermite secretly carried up the elevators and stairs, hidden in the burned floors, then that's your own stupidity.
MazJax 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@galaxything Where do you think the government gets information from? The scientists. They are paid to study. If you are gullible enough to believe that massive fires DIDN'T buckle the steel, but instead it was silent invisa-bombs that don't shoot debris and that were SECRETLY and cleanly planted by the government in front of 40,000 WTC employees as well as 10 dump trucks worth of thermite secretly carried up the elevators and stairs, hidden in the burned floors, then that's your own stupidity
MazJax 5 months ago
@galaxything Yeah, why bother actually reading the NIST report, written by scientists, and realizing it has no unanswered questions, when you can listen to professional paranoiac Alex Jones? You must be so much smarter than the millions of non-twoof scientists. Forget the WTC designer, Les Robertson who laughs at the theories. He's dumb and you are all geniuses compared to the dum ol' National Institute of Standards and Technology. They are paid off and take science out their ass, don't they?
MazJax 5 months ago
@MazJax Dude plssss do some research, the data was incomplete, didn't follow what actually happened and avoided all questions it couldn't answer with out giving it away, the NIST models are a joke and don't resemble the collapses... A few scattered fires un-even in only a few floors cannot corse a total global fail perfectly even and symetrical on all steel supports at the same time. The fact that small pieces of undetonated thermite / thermate are found throughout the dust suggests.....
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes? You must know so much better than they do, huh? Stop the fucking presses, Internet youtube dwellers are now smarter than scientists with phDs.
Few unscattered fires..tell that to the wtc collapse survivors.
All steel supports at the same time...I thought South Tower fell leaned to one side first while collapsing?
MazJax 4 months ago
@MazJax Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes
Is that a fact?? (LOL!!). Well i suggest you take the time to look the NIST video and B7 video side by side. There is an excellent video on line showing just that. I think you will find they match up
Perfectly!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Nist models the interior activity in the building. The interior floors collapsed from fires, especially on the east side. This is proven from the videos of WTC7, where you can see the penthouse on the roof collapsing due to the failed floors below it. The nearly hollow shell of the building easily collapsed later.
Can you show me your many years of intensive, first-hand research on the collapse, ratified by top scientists, and your own detailed model based on video proof?
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax I agree with you. I was going to post a video that shows exactly what you just wrote about.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles
Sorry about that, your comment just confused me a bit...
MazJax 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@galaxything Nist models are a joke?The models made my the expert teams of scientists and engineers who fully analyzed the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes? You must know so much better than they do, huh? Stop the fucking presses, Internet youtube dwellers are now smarter than scientists with phDs.
Few unscattered fires..tell that to the wtc collapse survivors.
All steel supports at the same time...I thought South Tower fell leaned to one side first while collapsing.?
MazJax 4 months ago
@galaxything Nist Models are a joke,eh? The models made my a team of scientific experts from around the world who studied the collapses from hard evidence for years after 911 are jokes, huh? You know so much better than they do, don't you? Stop the fucking presses. Youtubers are now smarter than scientists with phDs. What a relief it is to know that you guys are the future investigators for all the world's scientific problems. Screw the harvard professors that study first hand.
MazJax 4 months ago
@galaxything Few unscattered fires?? Is that what lost change told you? Hah. Please, try this: Tell that to a WTC collapse survivor, who is probably mentally and physically scarred for life by the fires and carnage, and see if you don't get a punch in the face. Also tell that to the firefighters.
"perfectly even" good god, you're resorting to straw-men? If these were "perfectly even" then why did the top bit of the south tower nearly tip over? And why did the core/antenna on tower 1 lean south?
MazJax 4 months ago
@galaxything A few scattered fires
LOL!! You're so out of it on this you really have no clue. Just for your info Building 7 was on fire top to bottom by the time it collapsed.
And another FYI. Thermite is not a material that anyone would use for a CD. Call up a demo company and tell them you'd like them to use it for your next CD..
Then wait for the laughter.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles you can see building 7 all the way up untill it falls and you can clearly see only a few fires through the windows of some floor! That does not cause global syncronised collapse! Thermite is a cutting tool perfect for not having too many loud explosions as it is silent based on that why would a demo company use it? lol idiot! see "Video of Shanghai skyscraper inferno as 53 killed in China fire" video and many other buildings that burned for days like a giant torch and NEVER fell
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything You have no idea about what your writing.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@galaxything Many conspiracy theorists point to the widely shown North side of WTC7 where there is not much visible damage. But the WTC south side is the side you want to look at. It was the damaged side, closer to WTC. It was bellowing thick smoke, and burning hard from the damage caused to it.
The skyscraper in china was much better designed for withstanding fires, and it wasn't heavily damaged with 25% of it scooped out, unlike WTC7.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax so your telling all buildings in history that have burned like the one in china and worse were all better made lol? Also the damage you speak of is BS you can see wtc 7 from all angles in various videos. If you really wan't to see damage check wtc 5/6 that stood near the base of the towers.. smashed in half literally! They had to be demolished as the remaining structure is still strong! Seems no one has any logic or common sense these days!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything
WTC7 was built in an economic recession in the 80's. It couldn't afford to have a great design. And yes, many of those buildings WERE better made. Any net design (many interior columns) is more structurally durable than the WTC's tube design (columns only in core and perimeter walls). And the WTC was actually heavily damaged before the fires took their toll, unlike the China tower.
Uhh, you can check any video and it points out the damage. Just search up "south side damage wtc7"
MazJax 3 months ago
@galaxything WTC 5 and 6 had complete floor collapses, many from fires themselves.
/watch?v=eWpOfUMz6SE
There was really not much left except for the outer walls, which were easily supported because they had many more support beams. Also, WTC5 and 6 were much shorter, meaning there was less weight to trigger a full collapse.
MazJax 3 months ago
Comment removed
galaxything 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Also it is a FACT 100% proof that chips of undetonated thermite is found in the dust in very large amounts, it is even the focal point for scientists and engineers who are trying to get a reinvestigation based on this fact. That alone says it all and no one can argue that.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Great, wonderful. Are you aware that it is not a material that anyone would EVER use for a CD? It requires high explosives. Go and ask a Professional yourself. Silly story entirely
The "TM" erected a steel sign at Burning Man in Nevada protesting for a new investigation. They were going to melt the sign in half with Thermite on either end.
But it didn't work.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles lol man! I am telling you it is a fact thermite is found in the dust and there is other clear evidence that therite reactions took place such as the by product of thermite reactions also found at the site. Also the guys that did that test fail! On a british tv science show they melted through a car bonnet all the wat down through the engine until it came out the bottom using thermite, the video is even on youtube.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything LOL man i am telling you!!!. Thermite is not a material that would EVER be used by a professional demolition team. It wouldn't happen my friend! It requires high explosives plain and simple.
The "TM" erected a metal posted sign at Burning Man in Nevada with "TRUTH" strung between it. They were going to melt it apart with Thermite to hilite the cause of "911 Truth" Even got Steven Jones to help out.
It didn't work.
The video is even on Youtube!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles I know it wouldn't be used by demo companies, why would it? But in the case of bringing down a building in plain sight and you want it to be a "secret demolition" then thermite is perfect, it is slower and you can weaken the structure and not need as many explosives it is also quite. And again it is a FACT thermite is in all the wtc dust in large amounts.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything No it's not a FACT. That is bullshit. There are also some KEY chemical signatures that MUST be present for Thermite. And they are not there. Which pretty much renders Jones story complete bullshit.
But he quietly doesn't like to talk about that point.
Look in to it and be a little more informed.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles OMG now I know your talking shit! Yes it is FACT do some fucking research! ACTUAL undetonated thermite!!!!! as well as the chemical by products of thermite reactions! You can even see it working in some videos although idiots like you say it could be something else.. But there is no dispute over the rest of the evidence. Your inability to research fully unhindered by your stubbornness and ego does not change the facts!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Time to ring up the common sense bell. The WTC is an acre across. If you seriously think a space this large supported by 47 HUGE interior columns and 230 exterior columns is going to be miraculously disassembled by a few buckets full of Thermite, or conversely!! 2 Dump trucks full of thermite.
You are on crack my friend!! And if you think this is going to take place and it is ONLY going to result in dusty wisps "undetonated" Thermite.
You're doing Heroin!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles A phew buckets of thermite? try several tons of it and placed at the right locations along with explosives. It's funny how you don't think thermite can cause collapse but you think fire can lol?? And if you wan't to talk logic then Newtons laws of falling bodies say that your the with with the illogical view! Again, fact, thermite found in the dust in amounts that must of been in the tons. I suppose you think thermite is a normal material to be found in the rubble of buildings.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Jones claims to have found traces of thermate on a piece of steel from the WTC. This claim is unsubstantiated. First, Jones does not cite the chemical composition of actual spent thermate signatures, for comparison. Second, Jones has not provided a chain of custody for the steel he tested that would preclude its contamination by other sources. Third, and most importantly, there is nothing unexpected about finding sulfur and trace metals on WTC steel and dust samples.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Who gives a shit about Jones. I am talking about scientists and scientific data, who the hell is Jones anyway lol? And as well I don't know what you are talking about, clearly have not done much research into this as you only cite "Jones" and talk of sulfur. The chemical by-products from thermite reactions are unique to such reactions and produce a type of metal not used in construction and in it's forms. Also the undetonated thermite found was high quality military grade!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Um. Steven Jones is the guy who "Claimed" to find this material.
I thought you knew all about this? Come on don't you research anything??
Geez!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Then why not say steven jones or steve jones as people say. But actually no I was not refering to him at least not him alone!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Well i have to thank you for walking straight in to that trap. Several tons you say?
Lets examine!! 244 ext columns 47 Int columns. Lets half that to be nice. 145. What say 200 pounds of Thermite per column? Gives us 29,000 pounds of thermite. Or 14.5 Tons of this material in the building. Visual terms think of a tandem dump truck full of this material.
If you believe this you got a few screws loose.
If you believe 14 tons ends up as a few particles?
Rubber room!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Actually your quite right. The estimation for the amount of thermite used was about 10 tons but the scientist in question said he wouldn't be surprised if it was 100 tons. This makes sense when you here the employees of the wtc centre saying that for months leading up to the attacks teams of workers were bringing in a lot of equipment, materials on large trollys and trailers and construction work was going on on closed floors and elivators for months.. They were sick of the dust.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything LOL!!! Shut up!! like just shut up!!. Dude. The WTC has independent security for every tenant. You don't just waltz in to the building with 14 tons worth of Thermite...
"Dum de dum...ooh well just back up the truck to the front door Jim and we'll secretly unload this here THERMITE"..
Thoroughly silly stories dude!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Derp! The security was of course involved in it you idiot! If you researched you would see that every that worked there couldn't understand the strange behavior of the security, look into it and you will see! Also look on the board of directors for the company in charge of security hmm..... Security removed and removed at odd times, sniffer dogs removed, security systems shut down for long periods of time and so on.. Research is your freind!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything Research is your freind!
So's a brain!! Its not a material anyone would use for a CD. There is no professional in existence who would ever use this to take down a building. Research is your friend?? tell you what. Go call up a demolition company and tell them you would like them to use... THERMITE to implode your building.
Then wait for the laughter. Because that is what you'd get.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Demolition companies don't use thermite idiot! seriously why would they, they are not trying to be secretive. It is amazing how the laws of physics, Newtons laws all go out the window!
galaxything 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Ill say again, Your fail to understand how such a thing could be carried out does not mean it didn't happen! That is called being naive and ignorant :D
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything No you got it backwards. Its called being informed and intelligent.
I know what I am talking about.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
@roquefortfiles Informed? When fail to see overwhelming evidence much of which is common sense. Intelligence when fail to understand physics and the basic laws of Newton, gravity, falling bodies and resistance.. What you are is naive ignorant and gullible and there is even a saying "gullible minds are immune to facts" You just sit there defending the people that attack us to blame it on the people who's countries they wish to invade.
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything You can't even string a coherent sentence together. I am not surprised you swallow dump trucks with 14 tons worth of Thermite nonsense.
There's credible and there's ridiculous.
You're beyond ridiculous.
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
Comment removed
galaxything 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roquefortfiles Again I find it funny how just because you fail to understand how it could be done, you fail to believe it happened. Naive, ignorant and gullible. You are everything that is wrong with the world you sheep dumb fuck! If it wasn't for people like you making excuses for the people that do shit like this then the world would be a better place!
galaxything 3 months ago
@galaxything
Right!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
Comment removed
galaxything 5 months ago
Comment removed
galaxything 5 months ago
@MazJax Also you can see that the second tower was a top down demolition. In other words it was destroyed from the top down, there was NOTHING above the zone of destruction so what was exploding it from the top down.. the upper floors?? what upper floors lol it was blowing up from the TOP down! watch the video named WTC NORTH TOWER EXPLODING, David Chandler, AE911truth. o r g and you will see for yourself!
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything Exploding from the top down?? What? Have you even heard of gravitational potential energy? If the support beams are weakened, and the load becomes too great, the load collapses. This is exactly what happened on 911. Not silent invisa-bombs.
MazJax 4 months ago
@galaxything so.. you gonna get a life soon?
Moron..
knutn 5 months ago
@knutn lol durpy durp typical response from a brainwashed idiot. Ignore Newtons laws of physics / gravity it's just all wrong ha? ;) Hope you enjoy life in the NWO m8!
galaxything 5 months ago
@galaxything Let me say it this way: LOL!!!
knutn 5 months ago
that was cool but i know it was a demolition.
BACONBITZ10 1 year ago
earth quke
ILIKEWAFFLES2593 1 year ago
erath quke!
ILIKEWAFFLES2593 1 year ago
i love it
ILIKEWAFFLES2593 1 year ago
Wow that looks very familiar!
kevykev38 1 year ago
@kevykev38 wow terrorist jokes? people like you should die
MrRccx 1 year ago
@MrRccx My comment was not a joke. And saying a comment like "People like you should die" is a death threat and Cyber bullying.. Youtube doesn't take Cyber Bullying lightly. Al i said was:"Wow that looks familiar!" And you had to wish death upon me? Sorry but i reported you to Youtube. I feel i should stop as many people like you who wish death on someone. Have you ever thought that there might be a weak person with no will to live on here? Andjustfollowyourdirection? sad very sad.
kevykev38 1 year ago
@kevykev38 lol, fag
MrRccx 1 year ago
@MrRccx So... case in point.
kevykev38 1 year ago
@kevykev38 the point is your a faggity terrorist lol
MrRccx 1 year ago
woah O.o
TheStarwolf11100 1 year ago
Amazing ,, COooooooooooool
astoniz 1 year ago
thats big
coolblastguy 1 year ago
CoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL
shark2000in1 2 years ago