Added: 9 months ago
From: Snarkipedia
Views: 7,974
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • once AGAIN proving global warming is real and NOW

    ht tp://theintelhub.c om/2012/01/20/nasa-2011-was-ni­nth-warmest-year-in-history/

  • youtube.com/watch?v=upgS56ORpZ­Q

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • were does she get her meth?

  • Yes, climate change IS real.

    No, it is NOT caused by humans.

  • @judomagyar, that's like saying forest fires are real but only caused by lightning.

    What part of CO2 has been proven to trap infrared heat do you not understand? That's been known since the mid-1800s, actually.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy

    What part of "we have a hundred times more H2O in the atmosphere" don't YOU understand? In comparison, the effect of CO2 is negligible.

  • @judomagyar, if you care to understand the science (it's NOT just "common sense") read this article completely:

    "Climate myths: CO2 isn't the most important greenhouse gas" (NewScientist site)

    The gist is that water vapor has a constantly fluctuating effect, while CO2 lingers for decades, trapping more heat all the while. A good analogy is slowly thickening glass on a greenhouse vs. variable interior humidity, with a long-term trend of net warming. Look it up and you'll learn something.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy

    Look man even my dog knows to get in the shade to cool down. Clouds provide shade. My dog is not moving from the higher CO2 area to the lower CO2 area. He is smart.

  • climate scientists need funding, they lie, you are ignorant. 29% of the earth is land, 3% of that land is developed. therefor less than 1% of the entire earth is populated. that 1% produces 29 billion tons of CO2 per year. 33% of the land is forest. i acre of forest disposes of 1 billion tons of CO2 per year. there is more than 10 Billion acres of forest. do the math, we dont even make a dent. and try looking at a globe to see the size of a city. its miniscule in relation to the planet. wake up!

  • @in8chro, you're in classic denial of many human impacts. Do you ever look at satellite maps? That gray stuff easily seen from space is us. We've changed the albedo of the land in many ways. City acreage is only a few % of human impact. Food, timber, mining & drilling take up vast areas.

    See: overfishing, deforestation, water depletion, topsoil erosion, "the sixth extinction", air pollution, water pollution, the urban heat island effect (separate from AGW), unnatural chemicals, radiation, etc.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy im in classic denial? whatever, even CERN agrees with me. you have been brainwashed my friend.

  • @in8chro no CERN does not agree with you. CERN agrees with me and with NoEcologyNoEconomy.

  • @in8chro, compare the profits from oil, coal and gas to climate research if you really want to follow the big money.

    Many things worth doing require funding, but that doesn't make them conspiratorial! You could pick any profession you dislike and use that mindless argument. Unless you can prove that CO2 doesn't trap infrared, all you have is conspiracy theories.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy you are brainwashed. there is no man made global warming. its the sun and ocean currents. wake up, cause you have fallen for the lie.

  • @in8chro you're missing that completely undeveloped land is being removed at an accelerated rate AND that land which continues to be undeveloped actually now has a large carbon footprint. Mine-extraction & clear-cutting is counted as "not developed" because it isn't a farm or a city. Until someone does put a farm or city there.

    We burn off more CO2 from industry than volcanoes do in a given year.

    Special exception for giant supervolcanoes but we aren't seeing any yet.

  • @ytgv3fc7 no, you are missing the point that you have been brainwashed. its the sun and ocean currents that is changing out climate, not man. think about it, less than 1% of the entire earth is inhabited. CO2 is not a poison, its plant food.

  • @in8chro no, YOU are missing the point that the evidence is hard core, carved in stone, can be re-proven any second of any day at any time forever. The ocean currents are being changed BY us not the other way around. Our dumping of pollutants is doing it. Our adding CO2 makes oceans acidic. WE did it. CO2 is a poison above plant-food levels and IT IS ABOVE. That means plants DIE. They are dying.

    The excessive heat kills them no matter how much "food CO2" is there. They died.

  • @in8chro if you did your research you'd see that 2011 saw the death of 60% to 80% of corn crops where there was plenty of CO2 "plant food" but so much heat it killed them. That means you'll fucking starve soon.

    More than 1% of the Earth is inhabited: I counted. We use more than 80% of the land surface for industry+farming+cities+urban housing, with the exception of DESERTS.

  • This is the type of girl who refuses to give blow jobs. Cunt.

  • @Ray666Magini no, this is the kind of girl who refuses to give blowjobs to fuckfaces.

    I'd get along just fine with her.

  • Ha ha, for another laugh you might enjoy Aussie musical group's take on climate change denial: "Denial Tango" here on YT at /watch?v=TrURLJ6Vlsg

  • alcore is just out to make money ! You need to do your home work.

  • nope

  • But I disagree, snarkipedia: the rationalists, scientists, environmentalists ARE winning. Even the US military and National Security Agency (NSA - I know someone who works there) takes anthropogenic global warming (AGW) seriously.

  • Snarkipedia: you're my new best friend. :) ;)

  • i still believe JESUS ROCKS:}ROCKS HOLD CARBON DON'T THEY,WOW,YOUR TEETH ARE REAL CLEAN AND STRAIGHT:}YOU ROCKS

  • Its amusing you spent your time ignorantly comparing one belief system to your own, also very freudian of you.

    Did you ever stop to think that the whole carbon exchange market that your messiah Al sits as board to, MIGHT stand to profit?  See i have a problem with anyone asking me to invest my future on an idea that and i quote "is not up for debate!!!" but its VERY open minded and liberal of you to accept such wonderous free thought.

  • @JonOccamBluecollar a carbon EXCHANGE system has nothing to do with the science of global warming. It's a fiat scam fraud no better than fiat dollars.

    Real resources are real money AND must be conserved, saved, left in the Earth or used sparingly.

  • I sure wish I could ignore fact and evidence so I could parrot whatever unsubstantiated claims of these mouth breathing climate change deniers are squawking. Ignorance would be bliss. Too bad I can comprehend the data, and the impending global changes that are going to continue to take place as we humans destroy our planet. Must be nice to watch TV and believe whatever you hear on the news. I will never know that comfortable ignorance you lucky idiots out there.

  • Who the Hell is Earl?

  • So if deniers believe that the Earth has heated up and cooled down many times over the years, where did they get that information? Science? So they believe that, but not this?

  • i love it when people complain that it's not fair to live on a planet w/ obstinate global warming deniers..

    then they go on to deny the existence of free energy. aliens. area-51, bilderberg, illuminatti, and.. there's a shitload of other things (not kiddin).

    if people can be stubbornly living in denial, is it really so hard to believe that mankind can live with massive amounts of secrets?

  • @katsumorymoto obviously there's no evidence for aliens, free energy and other nonsense, but there's daily massive evidence for global climate change & warming.

    Bottom line is people who follow the evidence MUST conclude there's no aliens yet and lots of global warming.

    Evidence, not belief, is important.

  • Carbon Tax? Carbon Tax? Flatulence tax???

  • <--climate change denier.....well mostly.

    FACT--well over 99% of everyone who has an opinion on this issue, on either side, has no clue WTF they are talking about. Unless you are a proficient climate scientist, and have thoroughly studied the VAST amount of data gathered, and closely studied the conclusions drawn, you have no valid opinion.

    What I do know is, Al Gore is a blowhard who has been saying the sea levels will rise since the 80s. It hasnt happened. I don't trust him.

  • I've seen a fairly convincing presentation showing what most of the warming data conclusions are based on, and it seemed to me very one-sided, overreaching, and ignored some glaring variables.

    Then there were all those leaked emails of people saying how the data gathered didn't portray the emergency situation they wanted, so they needed to re-work the study...

    I refuse to agree that man-made climate change is this uber threat to the earth. Both sides of the argument are wack.

  • @VegasBilgeRat Go look up potholder54's (it might be on his other channle potholder54debunckes) vids on climet change.

  • @VegasBilgeRat Michael Mann and the scientists of the CRU have since been vindicated many times over. Get your facts straight.

  • @VegasBilgeRat "I refuse to agree that man-made climate change is this uber threat to the earth. Both sides of the argument are wack"

    Then you doom us all to total suicide.

    Once the heat gets too high, which it now is, food crops fail massively & humanity is extinct forever. Total planetary suicide of most mammals and ALL humans is now 100% assured and it is YOUR ignorant fault. At this rate inside of 50 years the population of the planet will be no more than a billion, a full die-off of 6 bln

  • @ytgv3fc7 way to drink the cool-aid moron. The global temperatures haven't risen in about a decade.  The heat is certainly NOT too high. lol.

    Crops are not failing massively... your doomsaying is exactly what perpetuates the bullshit.

  • @VegasBilgeRat no kool-aid here you tard. The proven data taken from thousands of worldwide sources is that every year temperatures are up and this year has been no exception: corn is even being wiped out in North America it was so bad this year. The heat is certainly too high & starvation will follow. I'm talking directly to the farmers now reporting back crops are dead. THEY are also hearing from each other's farms from Monsanto as they go check on their product+yields. MASSIVE FAILURE

  • @VegasBilgeRat Climate change from global warming is decades-proven science:

    watch?v=7DZPs-JPKak

  • @ytgv3fc7 Keep up the great work, waking up the sleeping stupid masses!

    Stop the denialist brainwashing of our kids!

  • @VegasBilgeRat, then surely you accept the 97% consensus among climate scientists? They do know what they're talking about and they've been studying this much longer than people realize (1859 was a starting point).

    Al Gore has no hands-on input on the course of climate science, but he helped prevent Creationist Ronald Reagan from de-funding the critical CO2 work of Charles Keeling. Those who dwell on Gore are showing their ignorance of the science itself, and they'd rather dumb it all down.

  • @VegasBilgeRat FACT:

    ht tp://theintelhub.c om/2012/01/20/nasa-2011-was-ni­nth-warmest-year-in-history/

  • @ytgv3fc7 doesn't look like a fact to me. Looks like some empirical data gathered, that could have been modified, changed, or misrepresented before it hit your computer screen.  Gullible eh?

  • @VegasBilgeRat empirical data - that's what facts look like. "could have been" modified: then go test it yourself like everyone else can (and does). The precise opposite of being gullible. I've confirmed the facts personally more than 100 times.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Lolz. NASA's study proved that the "green house effect" is total bull shit as all the heat actually escapes. Keep pushing you bullshit leftist agenda though, 2012 might not be the end of the world but it sure will be the doomsday of you're religion of liberalism.

  • HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT­­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHO­T­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTH­OT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT­HOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHO­THOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTH­OTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHO­THOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTH­OTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHO­THOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHO­THOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHO­THOTHOTHOTHO­THOTOTHOTHOTHOTHO­THOTHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTH­OTHOTHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOT­HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT

  • Hydro dams cause flooding, wind turbines present a range of issues when near residential areas, solar farms are restricted by cloud cover and prohibitive start-up costs. Canada's oil sands are presenting serious health risks to communities downstream. I think the way to go is to have small-scale systems in each dwelling to ease stress on the grid and pocketbook. Rainwater collection, small scale solar/wind, and a woodburning stove in the winter is what i use.

  • Don't confuse actual pollution with CO2.

  • al gore has been proven full of shit. Carbon dioxide is not pollution. The earth's climate is driven by the sun. Carbon taxes be damned!

    She is hot though. Maybe she can get a job on CNN

  • @maluorno Carbon dioxide helps trap more heat in the atmosphere... please please please do your own research and learn the facts.

  • @sidd0123 - i have done research for the last 10 years. i used to think like you, but then i woke up to the proposed carbon taxes, cap & trade, Al Gore, climategate, lies and greed. Also if you look at the global climate graph, global CO2 levels go up AFTER global temps. (800 years or so). Al gore's 600 000-year graph doesnt show that little detail.

  • @maluorno You are right and wrong. The trigger is a temperature increase for whatever reason, ranging from the earth's orbit or a hole in the ozone layer. Nevertheless, it is this increase in temp that causes the oceans to release more CO2 and that is where your hypothesis falls. It is a cascading effect. We humans have directly avoided the initial temperature trigger and have increased CO2 production. I look forward to your answer, I find discussing these things interesting.

  • @sidd0123 - this 'cascading' effect is an unprovable theory supported as scare tactics by the IPCC. there is more of a correlation between sun activity and global temps than any other theory. they have selectively taken climate data to build their scam.

  • @maluorno We can go back and forth on how both of our assumptions are unprovable and just theories, so I propose that since we cannot agree on what does exist we can at the very least attempt to keep our planet clean by switching to renewable resources that do not damage the Eco-system. Can we agree on that?

  • @sidd0123 depends on what you call 'renewable'. All forms of obtaining energy have inherent issues that restrict their effectiveness.

  • @maluorno Can you provide a few examples? Restricting their effectiveness is still better than polluting the environment, at least that is my belief.

  • @sidd0123 -i'm butting in for a sec. Oil is the most available, cheapest form of energy on the planet. It runs the world. There is NO viable alternative to it yet. I'm all for this fairytale renewable energy that will replace oil and coal, but it won't exist for a long time.

    solar panels and wind energy are so costly, they're barely worth it, or are not worth it in most situations.

    I want things to be green and nice like any liberal, but I don't wear rose colored glasses.

  • @VegasBilgeRat That's where you are wrong. You are thinking about ONE alternative when the reality is if we really want to remove ourselves from our oil addiction, we must use multiple sources of renewable energy. Yes, solar panels and wind turbines are expenses, but they pay themselves back after several years. You also need to realize that we need to use renewable energy where it will produce the most energy. Solar panels in Maine wouldn't make much sense would it?

  • @VegasBilgeRat thats funny, over 75% of New Zealands power is generated from those things you claim are barely worth it. Green energy is possible.

  • @KaylinJH New Zealand is not exactly the epidome of the modern world.  Fail ass example.

    Oh, and way to pull a % out of your ass. That % certainly doesn't include vehicle fuels. Cars, trucks, construction vehicles, and airplanes don't run on wind turbines.

  • @VegasBilgeRat how is it a bad example when a first world country gets 75% of its power from renewable resources? New Zealand ranks fairly highly in the best places to live category. I personally think you are in a feverish spiral of denial. What happens when the J.E.T comes online and we have the first in a series of new fusion reactors? Stop burning dead plants mate this is the 21st century FFS.

  • @maluorno, sure, it's the blasted Sun! According to the endless feedback loop between you and Rush Limbaugh, and the liars he quotes..

    You could take about 5 minutes and learn that the Sun hasn't gotten any warmer, but you won't.

  • @NoEcologyNoEconomy - i don't know why you compare me to Rush Limbaugh. I had your opinoin. Then i had questions that noone could answer. Once you understand the politics of "Climate Science", you will understand that it is all a big cash grab. I wasn't talking about the sun getting warmer, either. Sun activity means suspots, solar flares and the like. If we spent as much time combating REAL pollution in this world instead of carbon dioxide, we would all be better off.

  • I find it funny how these people think they are smart because they have No Knowledge of the situation but Parrot a scientist. Woman are known to fall for Marketing scams fairly often but I thought once they pulled that change from Global "Warming" to Climate "Change" that would have tipped ya off. Guess Not. Even the fact that Al Gore does more damage to the Earth than all the people you want tax for the scam does not sway you from the Leftist Lie.

    Truth never changes lady...

  • I AM THE ILLUMINATI!

  • Ladies and gentlemen I give you Mrs. Maaaaatt Daaaaamon.

  • You make no arguments. Instead you make an assertion that people who question the validity of "co2 driven climate change" or "man made climate change" are creationists or only serve corporate interests.

  • The simple fact is that it wasn't that long ago in the 1960's and early 1970's when scientists were warning of global cooling. Yes, you read correctly. Cooler temperatures were measured, and it was thought that mankind was responsible for it. There were dire predictions made. Now warmer temperatures have been measured, and many scientists say it's mankind doing. Hysteria isn't a subsutitue for reason. Always use caution when faced with predictions of disaster no matter who is saying it.

  • The only people who deserve the death penalty: climate change deniers.

  • Climate Change was here since the start of the Earth. It's the ryhtmical pattern of the atmospheres mood swings every thousand years. Nothing that we can do about it, though. We might be responsible for a micro-change in the past few years, but we were never the cause of Climate change, since it's an ongoing process.

  • Globalwarming is the most, facistic, political GARBAGE man has ever made so far.

  • @Ruttie2

    Yes...

    That's EXACTLY why it's 5 days to September and 40degrees(Celsius; Which would be roughly a 100 Fahrenheit)...

    In Serbia...

    But, hey, at least we can comfort ourselves we don't have smog fogs that last for months...

    Yet...

    :-/

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Dude, Co2 is moleculairy too heavy. So the whole theory collapses like a

    house of cards. Nuff said, i'm done here.

  • @Ruttie2

    LOL!

    If it only was THAT simple...

    A water molecule is "too heavy" also...

    Yet, you DO have water clouds(just plain clouds), don't you?

    Anyways; What them damn scientists know...

    Corporations ALWAYS known better...

    And there's ONLY ONE healthier thing - An enriched uranium rod buried under your doorstep...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader We're done.

  • @Ruttie2

    LOL!

    I expected you to defend healthy uranium a bit too...

    Come on...

    We all know radiation poisoning is a big scientific lie...

    Have anyone ever saw that "radiation" thing, right?

    XD

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Okay, first, radiation has nothing to do with globalwarming. Second, when i look

    outside, it's not warm AT ALL, so that proves you're a big fat lyar. And third, you have NOTHING to

    defend yourself with, because defending a lie is simply, well. Impossible XDXDXD

  • @Ruttie2

    40 Degrees Celsius, looks hot to me for the end of August in Serbia...

    How can you say that I'm lying?

    You can go and check the temperature in Serbia today, and see for yourself...

    Then you can go and see if 10 years ago something like that was even a possibility...

    Idiot...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Serbia has always been hot, you moron ROFL XDXDXD And btw, i thought it was

    GLOBAL WARMING, well it ain't hot here, so... You're wrong.

  • @Ruttie2

    LOL!

    Hot in Serbia?

    Idiot...

    The highest temperature ever recorded here was only several years ago...

    And the winters aren't anything as before...

    So, please...

    I'd like I was wrong and your oil barons right...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader DUH, Climate change is happening all the time, but it's certainly not getting hotter. Ice cap growing, snow storms in Korea and America, what about that? Was that nature's mistake? Go to the church of climatology. FREAK.

  • @Ruttie2

    LOL!

    Climate extremes are exactly pointing out something is not quite right...

    That the balance has shifted...

    Those snow storms in America where none ever were aren't supposed to happen there...

    Do you really think that our activity, visible from the space, did nothing?

    Well, then you really are brainwashed quite a bit...

    "Ice cap growing"

    Yes it is growing(I'm from Serbia; "Growing" is when something is getting smaller and smaller, right? ;-)).

    P.S. How're EXXON and GE doing today?

  • @Orthodoxcrusader *Ahem!* /watch?v=zIJ0XZYok_o&feature=r­elated

  • @Ruttie2

    GOOD!

    I'm definitely getting "Hummer" now...

    Can I have it with a complimentary portable nuclear fuel cell, for a lawn mover, or is it sold separately?

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Wow, you really are an orthodox climatologist. I bet the climate bible says you aren't allowed to think outside the box, right?

  • @Ruttie2

    You tell me what an EXXON handbook says, and I'll reveal you the secret of our Evil Cult...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader That's gonna be hard for someone who doesn't even know what EXXON is?

  • @Ruttie2

    You might not know, but those who sold you the crap you bought know it very well...

    Every loyal and committed employee knows his/her boss...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Take some time to watch this video: /watch?v=jYsTF8z4ous&feature=r­elated

    Your cult is falling apart, boy. It's over. It's the spirit of 1776.

  • @Ruttie2

    "It's the spirit of 1776."

    LOL!!!

    Well, there you go - Glenn Beck and characters alike know Mr. EXXON very well!

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Actually, i got that from my favorite comedian: Alex Jones. Man that guy's funny XD

    But i bet you didn't even watch it.

  • @Ruttie2

    Alex Jones is a really serious man...

    He's also a closet scientist and so he KNOWS global warming is a lie...

    Like YOU and from recently me!

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Nah, Alex Jones has his own agenda. But okay, tell you what. Tell me your EVIDENCE. Give me all you got, you little cult boy of mine XDXDXDXD

  • @Ruttie2

    Global warming is a lie put out by the Illuminati(Who are watching us right now over a web cam) who seek evil ways to get rid of beautiful dirty energy and switch to evil renewable sources and overall sustainability, am I right?

    Evidence?

    Isn't REASON enough?

    How long it will be before oil is gone?

    40 years?

    60 years?

  • @Orthodoxcrusader Who ever said something about the illuminati? Even they have nothing to do with it.

    You haven't even watched the video so i'm not going to listen to you either, and who cares oil will fail. We

    got HEMP which was the original fuel in the first place. But the inventor got killed (Wow! Coincidence)

  • @Ruttie2 "got HEMP which was the original fuel in the first place."

    Hemp? LOL! You are deluded. Now, I know your retarded brain is beyond help. After you get all the fuel you can to put into the gas tank of your tractor to plant all the hemp seeds into the ground so that the hemp plant can grow and by the time it reaches maturity so you harvest it and then convert it into ethanol and burn the plants (which gives off CO2) you'll be lucky to get 10% of the energy back that you put in growing it.

  • @technatezin That comment is so stupid, so filled up with ignorance and irritation. That i can no

    longer respond to it. You are so incredibly stupid, extremist and ignorant, that i must end this bullshit.

    Go listen to global warming BS, government fag.

  • Comment removed

  • @Orthodoxcrusader a place in canada only has oil for 100 years(in current consumption),the oil that is ending is in wet form like arab oil that is very easy to reech proces and sell,the oil reserves of the earth in various forms is almost ""endless""...

  • @DoelGr

    Nothing is endless...

    Not even the energy from the sun is endless, as one day the sun will die ;-)

    Anyways; Quantity of oil on our tiny Earth is nothing near it...

    In current consumption oil, world wide, is estimated to be depleted in roughly in a century...

    However, the consumption is growing exponentially...

    The reasonable estimate, based on the growth, is from 40 up to 60 years...

    The amount of living things killed in a global cataclysmic event is quite limited, actually...

  • @DoelGr

    We can also synthetically make oil in a laboratory...

    With one tiny problem - The energy spent is far greater than the gained...

    The conclusion is simple; well switch to renewable resources and overall sustainability or will witness something to what the WWII compares like the Battle of Somme to a paintball match...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader yeah...im not questioning,im just saying!!

  • @Orthodoxcrusader This again proves you're wrong.

  • @Ruttie2

    Did I ever say radiation has anything to do with global warming?

    Of course I didn't...

    I'm not here to make you functionally literate, mate...

    I've only made a little reference to your beloved masters...

    The same interests who push "global warming is a lie" crap are the ones who talk about "evil unpatriotic windmills" and "friendly uranium rods"...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader No they don't you fucking moron. They just do this weird thing called THINKING.

  • @Ruttie2

    DEATH TO LIFE ON EARTH!

    LONG LIVE SHORT TIME PROFIT!

    I didn't realize it until now...

    You DO have a point...

    I think I'll buy a "Hummer"...

  • @Orthodoxcrusader I certainly am, if your theory is correct. I would to see some nice weather for JUST

    ONCE.

  • @Orthodoxcrusader ''What them damn scientists know...Corporations ALWAYS known better...'' ROFL

    That was a joke, right?

  • climate change is deffently real, and humans are deffently playing a large part, i would bet my life on this

  • lady. try looking out of what the left wings tell you, you might learn a thing or two

  • Don't worry. Chuck Norris is cool enough to drop the planetary temperature.

  • The weather will do what it wants to do ,so what

  • what about john coleman, the founder of the weather channel, and the 30,000 other scientist sueing al gore for fraud. that doesnt seem like the total agreement your talking about. and the fact is that 30 years ago the science clearly proved that co2 levels were causing global... wait for it... cooling. and what about the fact that co2 levels follow the warming not the other way around. global warming is a gravy train and corrupt scientists are riding first class

  • ChanneloftheRepublic

    No one is suing Al Gore.

    The qualification to be a 'scientist' to sign the petition was so low I'm qualified to sign it - twice over.

    John Coleman has a degree in media studies. He has no scientific qualifications.

    Search Potholer54 'Meet the Scientists' on Youtube for a clear explanation.

  • ONLY! naive saps! believe man causes global warming err cooling err warming err climate change! STOP! being so easily duped! this is ABOUT! taking your money and rights! NOT! saving the earth!

  • CO2 levels following warming, not the other way around. And since Al Gore was totaly wrong about global warming, we are now cooling, you all changed the name to global climate change. Human/breathes: Earth/Climate Change. Get it? As long as the Earth is here it's climate will be changing. We exhale CO2, it is not a greenhouse gas, in fact CO2 encourages plant growth. There have been much higher levels of CO2 on Earth in the past life thrived. I wish you would wake up to reality.

  • LoveAllOver1

    Oh you silly, silly person.

    1) Recent warming follows CO2. In the past tiny shifts in the earth's tilt and orbit (Milankovitch Cycles) have slightly warmed or cooled the planet. These are regular and predictable. Slight changes in the earth's orbit led to dramatic changes in climate. Why? because of the feedback effect. Recent warming is not connected to Milankovitch cycles and comes AFTER a CO2 rise.

    2) I wish you would wake up to reality.

  • @Herecomesthefatlady Oh I'm sooo silly. It wouldn't be logical to think since all arobic life exhales CO2 it is not a pollutant. It wouldn't make sense that every time a huge volcano errupts and spews Mega tons of CO2 into the air the earth cools.  It wouldn't make sense to believe that global warming is a scam since the earth is now cooling, or that CO2 levels have been several times higher in the past before humans existed. Oh wise fat lady you have shown me my silly silly ways. Thank You.

  • LoveAllOver1

    Firstly, I'd like to apologise for calling you silly - it is just that I get so tired of disproving the same internet perpetrated myths and half truths over and over again. I'm sorry, I'll try to be more polite in future.

    Your post response to me also contains many of these internet half-truths. I don't expect you'll want to, but please do check everything I say. It may not be important to you but it will be to your grandchildren.

    More to follow...

  • 1) "all arobic life exhales CO2 it is not a pollutant"

    Half-truth

    All aerobic life excretes shit too - and if we had too much of that we'd be in trouble! It is not the natural CO2 that is the problem - it is the additional CO2 caused by burning fossil fuels that is warming the earth. We know that the amount of CO2 is increasing because we can measure it accurately. We know where it comes from because of it's chemical signature.

  • 2) "every time a huge volcano errupts and spews Mega tons of CO2 into the air the earth cools"

    Half-truth and |myth

    Humans emit more than 100 times more CO2 than volcanoes. Volcanoes also emit particulates that temporarily cool the planet by reflecting sunlight back to space. This temporary cooling lasts only a couple of years. CO2 lasts for thousands of years. CO2 levels have been fairly stable over the whole of human history - until now.

  • 3) "global warming is a scam since the earth is now cooling"

    Myth

    The earth is warming and over the past three decades has shown significant warming. This myth came about as a result of a newspaper article in Britian's Daily Mail and has been doing the rounds on the internet ever since. Even 'sceptical' climate scientists like Roy Spencer agree that the earth is warming.

  • 4) "CO2 levels have been several times higher in the past before humans existed"

    Truth!

    Yes, they have but this is how we know how different the world has been in the past. You were quite right to point out that this was before humans existed - the climate , temperature and atmosphere have only been suitable for human life since we evolved. CO2 levels have been at about 280ppm ever since we evolved (with occasional dips during ice ages). They are now at 390ppm.

  • Lets make a commune. We'll have our own militia. Guns will be allowed and so will abortion, but neither will be necessary. We'll have a free market but the richest will be taxed heavily. We'll have freedom of religion and right to work. Marriage will no longer involve the state on any level and anyone can make anyone their beneficiaries. We'll call it "Little America". It'll probably get blown up by George Bush 3rd when he comes to power in 2525 and starts a war with the machines. A.I. sucks.

  • I say we kill all these mutherfuckers.

  • I HAVE THE SOLUTION,we nuke the planet and......waitforit.......... let the next "intelligent" critter have a go at it

  • Many natural planetary recovery limits have been exceeded, climate cycle is beyond human control and requires much of the land mankind now inhabits, mass migration to higher ground is inevitable, as are solar events, earthquakes etc. etc. To avoid major pandemics and resource depletion humanity must rapidly depart from their ego, fear based, agenda centric, competitive, methods of conducting their affairs... Developing a cooperative, sustainable, peaceful society, or perish as U*R... C.H.A.O.S.

  • Climate*Cycle... and yes there is plenty EVERYONE CAN*DO... For Without the constant, irritating bites from the fleas of resistance shinning light unto the shadows of greed and corruption, darkness would overwhelm human society...

  • CO2 MAKES UP .038% OF OUR ATMOSPHERE.

    FOR MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING THEORY TO WORK, CO2 HAS TO BE RIDICULOUSLY MORE ABSORBENT IN ORDER TO CAUSE CATASTROPHE!

    but i can't seem to find these four very important numbers...maybe someone can help?

    What % of the IR radiation spectrum can CO2 molecule absorb?

    What % of the IR radiation spectrum can nitrogen molecule absorb?

    What % of the IR radiation spectrum can oxygen molecule absorb?

    What % of the IR radiation spectrum can methane molecule absorb?

  • I wish that people would wrap their head around the climate debate.

    Here's a cheat sheet:

    Is the climate changing? Yes.

    Has the climate changed before? Yes.

    Does human activity impact the climate? Yes.

    Can the climate be changing for other reasons besides CO2 levels? Yes.

    Will the rich make money off of plans like cap and trade? Yes.

    Will it harm the physical economy? Yes, the amount of wattage being used currently could not be replace by solar, wind, tidal, etc. energy.

    Undeniable facts.

  • @MRELTUCO2

    ht tp://w w w.youtube.c om/watch?v=xyfVvAURMpY

    great drought of 2011 - global warming - climate change - driest in a century - game over USA

  • You haven't made any videos for quite a while. Why's that?

  • Morons,Look up climate gate.This chick is a very ignorant human being.

  • @MRELTUCO2 MORON. Look at the fucking thermometers everywhere.

    Climate-gate is a hoax - global warming is a fact.

    HEY LOOK HERE: h ttp://edi tion.cn n.c om/ 2011/ US/ 07/11/heat.w ave/index.h tml?hpt=hp_c1

    Several high-temperature records have been broken recently.

    Wichita, Kansas, hit 111 degrees Sunday. The National Weather Service says temperatures of 111 degrees have only occurred there 10 times since July 1888

    * you are SUPREME ignorance, a near-terrorist level of super-tardation *

  • @ytgv3fc7 Where I live in South Texas it is the same temp. year in and year out.So catching people manipulating numbers to shove this global warming down our throats is a hoax?Are you fucking serious?If it was such a hoax why did the organization admit it.Seriously you need help,how can you support the massive taxation of the poor based on fraudulent numbers that were admittedly manipulated?Now, if it is a hoax explain to me how?Oh and a nice ad hominem,I pity those who raised you.

  • @MRELTUCO2 they DIDN'T. No one admitted it.

    Not one person has "admitted" there is a hoax or no warming. Ever. Not for one second. That's the real hoax & I've dug in to find out how/why. The truth is some tree ring data was manipulated & brought into question. Nothing else. This does nothing else to defy the fact of global warming. Not for one second.

  • @ytgv3fc7 Wow you seriously are mental.The organization caught admitted that the Emails that were found with the evidence were in fact their own.I call that an admittance.If you shoot someone with a gun and hide it and one day it is found and linked to you and you admit it is yours.Would that not be an admittance?You really are showing signs of lunacy.First you get my postings wrong now this?You really are a piece of work.

  • @MRELTUCO2 you should pity yourself. Those who raised me made me the smartest person you've ever interacted with in your entire life.

  • @ytgv3fc7 I pity nothing,I know when I see lunacy.

  • @ytgv3fc7 Oh and a it is 89 degrees where I live right now.LOL.

  • @MRELTUCO2 You wrote 1 hour ago. It's already getting dark. It's the noon/daylight hot peaks that count for record-breaking heat, next to none happen near sunset or after. Anywhere.

    NOW: Austin TX: 99 , Corpus Christi: 90 , Baytown: 88 Victoria: 90

    PEAK: Victoria 99 , Baytown 97 , Corpus Christi: 95 , Austin: 102 - TODAY

    Don't play games with me boy, I'm smarter than you are

  • @ytgv3fc7 1 hour ago?Can you not read?Apparently your not that smart.I wrote the comment at 1:32 pm,that's why it says 8 hours ago.lol.Oh and what you just posted is normal south Texas temp..We always have hot summers,everyone knows that.What are you 12?Have you not studied this is school?It is common knowledge.

  • @MRELTUCO2 nope, it said ONE hour ago when I made my reply and I noted that was around 8pm Texas time. You wrote your comment at 8 pm your time zone. Not 1 pm. I gave the real temperatures from earlier in the day as per the Weather Network, young child. You have been schooled & exposed in your fraud.

  • @ytgv3fc7 Are you that sick?Exposed in what?I posted at 1:32pm the posting itself shows how moronic and docile you are.Apparently your parents did not teach you not to lie when made a fool.Oh and for your information Texas is a known hot spot in the country.The temps you posted are normal for Texas summers.

  • @ytgv3fc7 I bet the next thing your mental ass will say is that humidity in Texas is caused by Climate change.lol.

  • @ytgv3fc7 sorry.Have you not studied this in school?

  • No, Al Gore invented global warming that got hotter & hotter until He taxed Americans into a black hole of debt.

    Love this nutty hottie chick! =)

  • People who deny climate change are the same people who claim that evolution can not be observed. They typically make the moronic claim that, because it snowed for a day in a southern state, climate change is an obvious hoax......The fact that weather and climate are not the same thing apparently eluded them.

  • Can you explain why the EXACT same climate change is taking place on Planet Mars & Jupiter that is taking place here you dumb bitch? LOL! I guess its the little green Men on Mars driving thier SUV's?? LMAO! You leftist idiots crack me up. You live in "CAMBRIDGE" (code for HARVARD) therefore are FAR SUPERIOR to us "idiots" in fly-over Country right? Hahaha.

    You're another brainwashed buffoon. "Manmade global warming" AKA "Climate change"(since the coldest winters in recent times) is a joke.

  • @falcondriver100 the EXACT climate change on Jupiter is UNRELATED to Earth. It's very far away from the sun & any solar changes that would heat Jupiter will eternally scorch all life on Earth to death. Gone forever.

    Every 5 degree increase on Jupiter will increase an earth temperature, from the sun, 25 to 50 celsius degrees. In other words summer temperatures over 100 C boiling the oceans you fucktard

  • @ytgv3fc7 You're a moron. Read up on the subject you're spouting off about. Expert scientists say OTHERWISE.

    This big lie is just another attempt by the elites to control us & to steal yet more money from our wallets you buffoon. Mt St Helens put out more CO in one day than all mankind has put out in HISTORY!

  • @falcondriver100 you're a fraud & a liar. The scientists are saying what I'm saying.

    I've been following this topic my entire life. I've known the MATH for it, the inverse square law, since 1993. It's solidly locked into the fabric of the universe: with the distance linearly away from the source the power (sun's wattage per square meter of direct exposure) drops by 1/ (square of the distance).

    You're a fucking fraud

    Mt St Helen's never ever put that much CO2 (the core factor) in the air ever