Water comes from the "squeeze" of the earth inner. Like a sponge where you don't see the water but once you squeeze it it will just pour out. Earth was once a solid earth with a central center of gravity, but when the center of gravity moved away from the central position to the middle of the surrounding mass forming a hollow sphere started to expand and "squeeze" this mass thru gravitational force that acts in both directions(outer and inner). "The Land of no Horizon" a book that tells all.
@INMATE2468 Scientists gain the continuation of their profession, paycheck and/or social status for remaining silent on certain topics, or refraining from tipping the academic applecart. That's a significant motive, I think. Doesn't have to be a conscious conspiracy, just going with the mainstream grain.
It seems to me that this video may be in the right track even though it fails to explain where the water came from? Within the earths crust? I don't believe that is the case, we know for a fact that new crust is being created form the separation in the plates(comes from within the earth) and we also know that an earlier time the earth was totally covered in WATER not crust! So if this theory would be proven true that means that as the earth expands our oceans are becoming shallower.
the most accepted theory for water on earth is that most of the water came from comets, still this vid makes no sence, as the super-continent pangea was only a fraction of the earth with the rest of it all covered in water, not a huge peice of land that you see in the vid.
try reading it next time, i said 'the most accepted theory...' i stated the most probable scenario by scientists opinion (not mine, never mentioned it).
if you want my opinion: yes i think it's highly possible that a significant amount of water comes from comets. not a fact though, it's just so far the most acceptable and realistic theory
well, the first comment that catched my eye on that vid already sais it: where does the mass come from. the childish answer of the uploader further confirms that this theory (at least in the vid) doesn't make sense.
i can also go and show you random vids about what i'm proving, look at the top comment for instance. having a vid with a nice commentary doesn't prove facts.
@dirint so childish... how do you expect anyone to believe your wild theories from the 19th century with that attitude, especially if the opposite is already proven and not based on speculations like yours. it's come to the point that i'm actually convinced that im talking to a 12 year old here, only thing you've managed to prove so far.
as the earth expands into space, it takes up more space in space... for every action there is a reaction... in this case space itself pushes back... evenly around the globe... equally with the same subtle force... this is what we call gravity! its the only thing that makes sense! stick that in your pipe and smoke it! its fun flippin apple carts over!
Gravity is Caused by the Displacement of Space... as the earth has expanded, the gravity has increased... this explains why we had giants on earth long ago... smaller earth = weaker gravity, allowing people to grow into giants... simple stuff.... you heard it here 1st!
Where exactly do mountains come from in this theory? The animation shows India attached to Asia for the entire time, so where would the Himalayas come from?
This can, of course, be explained by plate tectonics.
@eggroll9000 explain to me the reason as to why the earth in the middle of the ocean is millions of years younger than the outside of the ocean. :) kthnx.
@dirint Then just click the link to plate tectonics or watch a documentary about it or whatever... It's really not a secret how plate tectonics works. The material along the ridge is younger because that's where the magma from inside the Earth comes out and cools down.
@eggroll9000 Excellent. So if we were to go back in time highlighting the ages of the sea floor, and essentially reversing time based on evidence of age from the sea floor we will be able to see how the plates shift correct? ;)
@eggroll9000 youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=190s This is the mapping of the sea floor by age, and the reversal of its age to show "tectonic shift". :)
@eggroll9000 the fact that this video exist is even funner bc the fact IS GOD MADE HEAVEN & EARTH not the big bag earth wont expand or we cant do that just plain fact God made heaven & EARTH
@Andrewlohbihler You seem to be mistaking scientific ignorance for critical reasoning...A lot of people do that. A lot of people think they can discuss scientific theories on equal terms with scientists, and deny things like evolution and global warming because they are arrogant enough to think they're smarter than the people who have studied the subject for their whole life... But that's not "critical" or skeptical. That's just plain retarded.
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
@ajozuna Another example of limited thinking, have you ever guys heard about "transformation" like a balloon that inflates and transform, does that balloon needs extra mass? or a soup bumble?
@scaloi A balloon is filled with air when it's inflated... and believe it or not: air has mass. Same goes for soap bubbles. If you wanna make a point, please at least think of examples which aren't THAT stupid.
@eggroll9000 So what's your point here??? My point was to give an example where there is no need to add extra mass in a spherical object. You don't need to inflate earth in order to have a hollow sphere. You should get into a pre-school, get some modeling clay and try to build a hollow sphere from a solid sphere and then compare the size of them and weight them also and then have the guts to tell us about.
@eggroll9000 yes I did, went directly to high-school, ha ha ha no guts to say anything about the subject (Expanding Earth in case you don't know what the subject is)
1. Question again: According to your theory, where does all the water come from?
2. Question: Why is the pacific ocean bigger than the atlantic? If the earth expands, then I would think that it expands everywhere at the same speed. Then, all oceans should be the same size.
this is the dumbest video i have ever seen, where the fuck did all the water come from then? either water is new to earth or the mantle floated, both are impossible
How do you explain the fact that the oldest sea floor datings are only 900KYO. That makes Canadian Shield Pre-Cambrian rocks dated at 1.5BYO as some mistake?.
@templerman1 The oldest ocean floor is Permian-Carboniferous, dated at 290-300 million years old. That's almost a third of a billion years old. But even if the oldest ocean floor was 100 years old, wouldn't say anything about whether Earth grows or not.
@CHUBBLE117 explain to me the reason as to why the earth in the middle of the ocean is millions of years younger than the outside of the ocean. :) kthnx.
You should just stop wasting your time on this, i bet if you focused all your efforts on your comics rather than trying to support this absurd theory. You could probably make enough money to retire. I have a feeling you make a regular attendance of the rumour mill sites instead of taking the actual university lectures. But alas seeing how you argued with others you'll simply call me a moron or something dismiss my comment and continue on with your head held high with a sense of pride.
@datzfast no one you pretentious dick. now we're even in regards to irrational insults. I was getting across that to those who aren't as informed in the geological field who may fall victim to these false theories i threw my two cents in and requested everyone to watch that video "expanding earth my ass" <--- that's the name in order to get a better understanding.
Okay, I have a minor in geology. I've never felt more afraid for the future of humanity then after watching this video. he's based all his current "knowledge" off simply squishing the landmasses together and saying "ta-dah!" excuse me sir, what right do you have to simply dismiss 200 years of geological discovery for such an absurd accusation that the earth grows?! There not only is subduction, but there accumilation of sedimentation! its what built the grand canyon!
the video doesn't show well what "goes on" in the Pacific coast! how does Australia end up fitting between Asia and America?? at first I thought the coast of Australia would fit with the western coast of Peru and Chile
would it surprise any of you that Niel Adams is a comic book artist for DC. This guy has an imagination, thats how he makes his living. but none of this needs to be taken seriously. There isn't anything legitimate about this. it fails to account for the existance of water, it disregards fossil evidence, and physics and reality. think on this, if the world was expanding, it would be getting progressively less and less dense. as such, gravity would be getting measurably weaker. but its is not.
People who are interested in real science don't throw around the word "truth" as if it were some kind of spiritual revelation. And I posted because America is already drowning in enough unsupported pseudo-scientific rubbish. Are you afraid of real science?
No, real science --all the evidence--says we are apes. But perhaps a magic man in the sky waved his magic penis and made the human race. Is that more plausible or less of a joke?
EXPLAIN THE SCIENCE EXPERIMENT THAT HAD A LASER SHOOT A LAVA ROCK, AT THE SAME TEMP AS THE SUN WOULD THE EARTH. THIS EXPERIMENT SHOWED A CRUST FORM A MOVE AROUND THE MAGMA WHILE IN THE VERY CENTER WAS A CRYSTAL BALL. TELL HOW YOU EXPLAIN THIS WITH YOUR THEORY???
Northern light is spacestuff that makes earth grow i think.
Now much northen-lights so we might expect increase in vulcanic activity and earthquakes.
Maybe snake bites tail is symbolic for earthcycles, snakes shift skin and grows little bigger. extra aware and think about where we life in these times of change i think.
@scaloi The life started inside first and migrated thru oceans outside where it adapted to the harsh conditions, compared with the inner ones. Inside it was only day time like sunrise all the time, no winds, constant temperature, right humidity, perfect environment for life. Why do you think we still need sun-glasses, clothes, back-pain problems and born blank as a hard-drive just ready to be formatted.
@DaMastaOfRoad Not in the middle but on the crust which is aprox. 600-to 800 mi. thick . The so called iron core is in the middle of this crust , also the gravity center is there. In the center of the earth there is a gravity pull sun, not a nuclear reaction sun.The crust has on both sides oceans and continents.The crust was at the beginning much thicker but because of this expansion due to gravity pull got thinner and continues to get thinner thus expanding the earth without adding any mass.
@DaMastaOfRoad Mountains, continents and oceans are on both sides of the crust. Imagine the crust as a sponge with water in it, you don't see the water, but the moment you start to squeeze it you'll see the water on both sides. The crust was between 600-800 miles and now is aprox. 120-200mi.
@DaMastaOfRoad The earth it's a hollow sphere, with continents and oceans on outside and inside, floating on magma who is located between outer and inner side. This magma is the gravity line and is attracting both sides, thus by modifying it's thickness you'll get an expansion without any need to add mass.
@DaMastaOfRoad yes like an iron core sponge balloon if you want to called balloon, I called sphere. The balloon needs to be inflated in order to keep a sphere shape, while earth didn't inflate but expanded by itself from the gravitational force.
@DaMastaOfRoad Not at all, the force is the gravitation that pulls both sides together for billions of years and is making the crust thinner, like the balloon when you inflate it it's walls gets thinner and thinner.
@DaMastaOfRoad Don't have to dig, all you need is a connection to a government control opening. You are a perfect example of a society obey-er, and modern witch killer, you better start drinking wine from a lead cup like Romans and maybe you'll be able to multiply two Roman numerals, or joint my campaign to ban hydric acid the No.1 killer of babies and children.
You guys do realize that liquid expands when it freezes. The core of the earth is molten lava (liquid) which is cooling into solid rock. By simple observation, we can determine that the earth is expanding just like water does when it freezes.
@stickfigkill You realize that property is unique to water, and possibly a few other substances, don't you? The majority of substances shrink when hardening
@stickfigkill The vast majority of liquids actually contract, or become more dense when they transition into solid phase. Water ice is one of very few exceptions to this rule; the water ice formed at below 0C at standard atmospheric pressure has a crystalline structure which keeps the molecules further apart than in the liquid form.
@bushbasher42 There is no extra mass. Just a change on density. I think the reason for the expansion was the washing off by the solar wind of an ancient and very thick Jupiter-like atmosphere. That atmosphere hold the water that currently is on the oceans.
@seanncali There was one huge shallow sea, covering ALL of the planet. That is why the oldest fossils of sea creatures are found ON THE LAND. It USED to be the sea floor.
I like to reduce everything to Heat. Like all roads lead to Rome, everyone wants to find energy sources, but eventually you examine what is done with any energy, and that is to produce Heat. Heat the Water, move the machine, make Electricity, and then Heat the House, In the end, we seek not Energy , but Heat Sources. Universally, everything is made of Heat. What is Heat ? I say it is "The Wrath of God" !!! Time may be more related to Heat Loss , than related to Light Speed.
The only sense of expansion means, not to add more material or energy , but to space out the particles further and further, and that approaches the Dark Space Energy Field, as Matter moves less and less Heat. Eventually the furthest expansion would be to the extent out of the Big Bang, that the Field of Space as a material fabric, can express a movement . Space itself is a force field much stranger than photon energy or light. Space is not the Void, Space moves through the Void
I just learned of Earth expanding , few months ago; and found it to make sense. But you have to add to it the concept of NEW MATTER AND ENERGY formation, over the millions of years, to be complete.
If the Earth expanded /is expanding, one must explain the new matter and water that is needed/ necessary for the Earth to expand. My Theory is , just as we accept the concept of Black Hole, in which mater and light are pulled in, to disappear. In a mirror fassion, we can see a tunnel between the Black Hole and center of the Earth, in which same matter come back; or it might be NEW matter, altogether. You do not see it scientific, well , you are in for a surprise. I just learned of Earth expan
according to the Hubble Constant, the rate of Universal Inflation the Laws determining how much Mass is possible in the same space, is likely to be re calibrated like the sliding parts of the old Slide Ruler used for Trigonometry. As the Hubble Constant and Special Relativity change the Universe then the same mass should also expand in any place in the Universe as a reaction overall to Cosmology. The very space inside the atom would expand if the Universe is Inflating itself.
@brianoc10 It would seem so, that the same rising tide or volumetric expansion would be no one could sense the relative change. But if the Laws of the Universe have a tipping point at various benchmarks of Universal Expansion, then Revolutionary Change would occur, and we have no study to predict what changes , but I would expect that "Heat" is going to behave radically in increasing empty space. The Void is Antithetical to Matter and Energy, it is the great unknown .
"NASA Research Confirms it’s a Small World, After All" - Google this report, less than a month old.
"...a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth"
@MagicStickUK I think that the study was done in a short period that failed to detect any expansion.May be "expansion" can be measured, only in 10 years, 100 years or even 1000 years
@albertsneijMD absolute rubbish. The earth is either expanding or it is not. If it was happening it wouldn't slow down or speed up it would be a steady rate. This theory states that the earth is expandDING not expanDED. NASA's study is part of a world wide effort and blows a whole straight to the heart of this theory. It cannot be ignored.
@MagicStickUK how long have we had instruments that can measure things like this, versus how old is the earth.. To completely abandon this theory is a stupid thing to do. And to completely abandon techtonics is also stupid. In this video i see clearly both theories in motion.. Plates are moving and growing. If the universe is expanding as NASA claims, the moon is getting further away, then is it so hard to believe the planet has also gotten larger since the first 2 rocks collided with eachother
@painterjohn512 It's hard to believe for countless reasons. Just one of the reasons (and one that I don't hear lot on these threads) is:
If the earth did expand as much as this theory implies then there would have been a considerable change in the earths orbit around the sun over this time of expansion. (I'd love to to the math on this if Neal could tell us what he thinks the min size the earth has been). It would mean the moons orbit would have changed drastically too.
@painterjohn512 The changes in both these orbits could have been disastrous. Not just for our climate but also (possibly (again, need to do the math)) causing the earth's - and/or - moon's orbit to become unstable.
Again. I point out just one of the countless arguments that make this theory questionable. To be nice about it.
@painterjohn512@painterjohn512 Alos. Your point about "How long have we had instruments like this" shows that you didn't read the study, and has a small grasp of the scientific method. If you have a certain about of data points of a relatively small period of time. You can draw a line through these points and extend them in both directions. Which allows to to make predictions on past and future data points. You don't have to measure 'absolute zero' to know when it would occur....
@MagicStickUK that does not mean the theory is incorrect. Drawing a line between points and measuring them doesnt mean the area hasnt, or will ever move. It simply means during the time of the study the points havent moved.. The surface around a volcano may not move for centuries until the last few years before an eruption.. yet it moved, and just because it moved X amount doesnt mean it will continue to move. Predictions are guesses, nothing more. Insulting my "grasp" on things is not needed
@painterjohn512 So is this theory called "The Expanding Earth Theory" or "The Expanded Earth Theory"? As much as I can agree with what you are saying here, this doesn't agree with Neal proposed mechanism for how the earth is expanding. He is the one that says it will continue.
Also, the moons orbit HAS changed, and is CONSTANTLY changing. The moons size has changed since its begining, each time something impacts it it changes, just like the early Earth did. And I dont know about the math, but the Earths orbit has changed, there have been several studies on this. The events that caused out planet to rotate at an angle on its axis had enough force to alter our orbit. Again several studies on this.. most are theories, but they seem plausible to me, but what do I know
I think you missed my point completely.. You were very quick to attempt to prove some higher level of intellegence over me. No i didnt read the study.. another smug narrow minded asshole probably wrote that too. My point was HUMANS which you are one of, can only guess as to what the true history of our planet is, since none of us were there to witness it. Science, Tools, etc etc can help make the guesses more accurate, but not exact
@painterjohn512 It wasn't one person who wrote the study. It was a world wide effort.
And again, we cannot "only guess". We can study, gain data, make predictions on that data, if a prediction turns out to be validated by other data we can presume our initial hypotheses is valid. This is how science works. Yes, it may not be EXACT, but its better than looking a a globe and saying "I'd bet my left nut that the earth expanded. Why? Because it did, thats why"
For the idiots...this video is suggesting the theory that earth is a growing planet. Which already makes a lot more sense than the big bang theory, which has a ton of flaws, and something is obviously up because this image of a smaller earth, and the continental plates fit together PERFECTLY. Scientists obviously will not accept and deny this more accurate theory though because that would mean that all of their hard work would have been totally wrong and they would have to start from scratch.
earth does expand because all matter in existence expands at the same rate. you have the inside of the earth and the outside expanding at different rates. simple minded. If you can understand the latest m theory or string theory this would be a given...
Always watch the whole world! acquire the global viewpoint! And fly to the end of the space! Be united with God! Lead to the acme of the narcism indulgence.
@nealadamsdotcom Finished thinking now... what you present is codswallop, bunkum, balderdash. Unscientific nonsense, complete tripe. I find it sad that so many people - like yourself - are willing to set aside scientific scepticism, and instead invest their belief in utter tog which hasn't presented any *real* evidence; and at the same time will just take a sniff at a million pieces of scientific evidence that point (with almost complete accord) to something completely different!
doesn't plants transform solar energy into matter?? I bet that some of the solar energy gets trap in earth and it's transformed into matter, and what about meteorite showers, which most of them have water on it. in my opinion earth is growing but very slow, it should be like 1.5 bigger in about 2 billion years. just a guess.
In fact does plants not transform light into matter, they store the energy chemically in carbohydrates (sugar) the matter is already there.
Also it takes huge amounts of energy to create matter, to create 1kg of matter you would need (according to Einstein) 1J * the speed of light the speed of light, that is 90000000000000000J.
and if the mass had come from meteors, and there is no subduktion we would stand on a few 1000 km of them.
@esbendit you left me thinking about what you said, you said that "it takes huge amounts of energy to create matter", maybe that's one of the main functions of black holes, to turn energy into matter, but there is a problem, what would happen to the matter that gets in? ? ? we may need a century or more before we know it.
Even though any theory can be debunked and the debunker can be debunked ,and so on , its an interesting theory , but its a sad thing for the man behind the theory getting called an idiot by another idiot.....
Search on the JPL.NASA website for the article "NASA Research Confirms it's a Small World, After All". A team of researchers from around the world "detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth". boooom baby! ;)
umm well tell me where the bones went? i'm not for or aginst this theory because i just heard about it and am looking into it. But please do tell me why the bones don't match up with this theory? again i am not for or aginst i just want to know.
@Blazenresearcher well they say (i dont have an opinion on it) thats why dinosaurs grew so large. now comets and meteors are constantly hitting the earth making it larger(in fact there is a meteor shower tonight). so earth is growing. now the argument is how much has it grown since the formation of the moon (when we hit a differnt planet) truthfully i think the pangia theory is correct, but only a fool would blindly accept everything they hear.
were did all the water come from than? other than that i like this theory it makes sence to me and i think explains how mars is a pre-earthlike world unlike venus which is a post-earthlike world
Water comes from the "squeeze" of the earth inner. Like a sponge where you don't see the water but once you squeeze it it will just pour out. Earth was once a solid earth with a central center of gravity, but when the center of gravity moved away from the central position to the middle of the surrounding mass forming a hollow sphere started to expand and "squeeze" this mass thru gravitational force that acts in both directions(outer and inner). "The Land of no Horizon" a book that tells all.
scaloi 8 hours ago
Where's the water come from them, smart-ass?
Bugstomper2 3 days ago
It sounded very legit until he said that scientists don't want to tell us -.- as if scientists gain anything by keeping it a secret
INMATE2468 5 days ago
@INMATE2468 Scientists gain the continuation of their profession, paycheck and/or social status for remaining silent on certain topics, or refraining from tipping the academic applecart. That's a significant motive, I think. Doesn't have to be a conscious conspiracy, just going with the mainstream grain.
LifePsyop 4 days ago
Did you notice the Earth's spin here is clockwise?
TrueHamal 1 week ago
Chickens some parrots and turkey can't fly but they have wings. They fly when the earth had less gravity and less water.
kalimeraHellas 1 week ago
an insane idea, followed by insane cultists. just read the comments below.
raverdeath100 2 weeks ago
It seems to me that this video may be in the right track even though it fails to explain where the water came from? Within the earths crust? I don't believe that is the case, we know for a fact that new crust is being created form the separation in the plates(comes from within the earth) and we also know that an earlier time the earth was totally covered in WATER not crust! So if this theory would be proven true that means that as the earth expands our oceans are becoming shallower.
MrAndradexo 2 weeks ago
@MrAndradexo
the most accepted theory for water on earth is that most of the water came from comets, still this vid makes no sence, as the super-continent pangea was only a fraction of the earth with the rest of it all covered in water, not a huge peice of land that you see in the vid.
DIExxENE 1 week ago
@DIExxENE are you quoting an accepted theory as fact? :) maybe the water didnt come from comets.
dirint 1 week ago
@dirint
try reading it next time, i said 'the most accepted theory...' i stated the most probable scenario by scientists opinion (not mine, never mentioned it).
if you want my opinion: yes i think it's highly possible that a significant amount of water comes from comets. not a fact though, it's just so far the most acceptable and realistic theory
DIExxENE 1 week ago
@DIExxENE youtube.com/watch?v=z1oza6jybOA // simple physics. :)
dirint 1 week ago
@dirint
it's a broken link
DIExxENE 1 week ago
@DIExxENE youtube.com/watch?v=z1oza6jybOA // copy and paste into google. youtube adds code to links that makes it not work. =[
dirint 1 week ago
@dirint
well, the first comment that catched my eye on that vid already sais it: where does the mass come from. the childish answer of the uploader further confirms that this theory (at least in the vid) doesn't make sense.
i can also go and show you random vids about what i'm proving, look at the top comment for instance. having a vid with a nice commentary doesn't prove facts.
DIExxENE 1 week ago
@DIExxENE the "proof" you're looking for was in the link I sent you by the same guy further evaluating on the topic above. :)
dirint 6 days ago
@dirint
i am not convinced, and with that i will end this confersation as it is taking a lot of my valuable time
DIExxENE 5 days ago
@DIExxENE "I will not research this further, I will remain willfully ignorant." -DIExxENE
dirint 4 days ago
@dirint so childish... how do you expect anyone to believe your wild theories from the 19th century with that attitude, especially if the opposite is already proven and not based on speculations like yours. it's come to the point that i'm actually convinced that im talking to a 12 year old here, only thing you've managed to prove so far.
DIExxENE 3 days ago
@DIExxENE Neither are proven, but expanding makes more sense than how drastic everything is moving around. lulz.
dirint 3 days ago
as the earth expands into space, it takes up more space in space... for every action there is a reaction... in this case space itself pushes back... evenly around the globe... equally with the same subtle force... this is what we call gravity! its the only thing that makes sense! stick that in your pipe and smoke it! its fun flippin apple carts over!
controlfreakssuckass 2 weeks ago
Gravity is Caused by the Displacement of Space... as the earth has expanded, the gravity has increased... this explains why we had giants on earth long ago... smaller earth = weaker gravity, allowing people to grow into giants... simple stuff.... you heard it here 1st!
controlfreakssuckass 2 weeks ago
New T-H-E-O-R-Y.........
No1EndoRush 2 weeks ago
Where exactly do mountains come from in this theory? The animation shows India attached to Asia for the entire time, so where would the Himalayas come from?
This can, of course, be explained by plate tectonics.
bushbasher42 2 weeks ago
Why are there fossils of aquatic animals in higher elevations?
sapperzulu 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I used the same mass generating method to make my cock bigger.
gregrutz 2 weeks ago
Troll Science
Guolettue 3 weeks ago
Are you fucken stupid, go back to the 6th grade science, where is the mass coming from to increase the volume of the earth, as well as the water.
90sCIGasian 3 weeks ago
@90sCIGasian Doesn't need extra mass to grow, limited thinking...again
scaloi 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fact that this video has more likes than dislikes makes my heart ache....
majormariofan805 3 weeks ago
The fact that this video has more likes than dislikes makes me sad...
eggroll9000 1 month ago 10
@eggroll9000 explain to me the reason as to why the earth in the middle of the ocean is millions of years younger than the outside of the ocean. :) kthnx.
dirint 1 week ago
Comment removed
eggroll9000 1 week ago
@dirint Do you mean the Mid-Atlantic Ridge? Just look it up on Wikipedia.
eggroll9000 1 week ago
@eggroll9000 I read the whole page.. That did not explain anything about the reasoning behind it being millions of years younger.
dirint 1 week ago
@dirint Then just click the link to plate tectonics or watch a documentary about it or whatever... It's really not a secret how plate tectonics works. The material along the ridge is younger because that's where the magma from inside the Earth comes out and cools down.
eggroll9000 1 week ago
@eggroll9000 Excellent. So if we were to go back in time highlighting the ages of the sea floor, and essentially reversing time based on evidence of age from the sea floor we will be able to see how the plates shift correct? ;)
dirint 1 week ago
Comment removed
dirint 1 week ago
@eggroll9000 youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=190s This is the mapping of the sea floor by age, and the reversal of its age to show "tectonic shift". :)
dirint 1 week ago
@eggroll9000 the fact that this video exist is even funner bc the fact IS GOD MADE HEAVEN & EARTH not the big bag earth wont expand or we cant do that just plain fact God made heaven & EARTH
Chicagoman36 1 week ago
@eggroll9000 Have you ever tried critical reasoning? Try it once in a while.
Andrewlohbihler 17 hours ago
@Andrewlohbihler You seem to be mistaking scientific ignorance for critical reasoning...A lot of people do that. A lot of people think they can discuss scientific theories on equal terms with scientists, and deny things like evolution and global warming because they are arrogant enough to think they're smarter than the people who have studied the subject for their whole life... But that's not "critical" or skeptical. That's just plain retarded.
eggroll9000 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
Andrewlohbihler 10 hours ago
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
Andrewlohbihler 10 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
Andrewlohbihler 10 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eggroll9000 You would love to call me a troll. But you yourself are guilty of that very trait. A lifetime of study does not make you an EXPERT by definition just because you get tenure. Try understanding exacty why the Pacific has expanded and don't give me your dogmatic troll-like explanation for Plate Techtonics. Clearly the Pacific has expanded, so the earth HAD expanded. But nature is nature regardless of what your PT fuddy-duddy club thinks.
Andrewlohbihler 10 hours ago
Utter crap. Earth would have been the size about the of Mars. Where did the extra mass come from?
ajozuna 1 month ago 4
@ajozuna Another example of limited thinking, have you ever guys heard about "transformation" like a balloon that inflates and transform, does that balloon needs extra mass? or a soup bumble?
scaloi 3 weeks ago
@scaloi A balloon is filled with air when it's inflated... and believe it or not: air has mass. Same goes for soap bubbles. If you wanna make a point, please at least think of examples which aren't THAT stupid.
eggroll9000 16 hours ago
@eggroll9000 So what's your point here??? My point was to give an example where there is no need to add extra mass in a spherical object. You don't need to inflate earth in order to have a hollow sphere. You should get into a pre-school, get some modeling clay and try to build a hollow sphere from a solid sphere and then compare the size of them and weight them also and then have the guts to tell us about.
scaloi 10 hours ago
@scaloi Sounds like you dropped out of pre-school...
eggroll9000 8 hours ago
@eggroll9000 yes I did, went directly to high-school, ha ha ha no guts to say anything about the subject (Expanding Earth in case you don't know what the subject is)
scaloi 8 hours ago
@scaloi I did... But you didn't even understand it
eggroll9000 8 hours ago
@ajozuna space?
rubbe 2 weeks ago
@ajozuna space?
rubbe 2 weeks ago
Any1 actually believing in this must be shot on sight. This video made the biggest facepalm I had lately.
Arwiiss 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japan Quake Lifted Seabed 16 Stories—Largest Recorded
I have a question . Can you please explain the findings in this article and how do they fit in - or not- with your expanding earth theory.
Achdus5772 1 month ago
Comment removed
Achdus5772 1 month ago
1. Question again: According to your theory, where does all the water come from?
2. Question: Why is the pacific ocean bigger than the atlantic? If the earth expands, then I would think that it expands everywhere at the same speed. Then, all oceans should be the same size.
BuggaUgga 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who the fuck died and left you inchage of the world you ass buger
datzfast 1 month ago
this is the dumbest video i have ever seen, where the fuck did all the water come from then? either water is new to earth or the mantle floated, both are impossible
TheBrradsullivan 1 month ago
How do you explain the fact that the oldest sea floor datings are only 900KYO. That makes Canadian Shield Pre-Cambrian rocks dated at 1.5BYO as some mistake?.
templerman1 1 month ago
@templerman1 The oldest ocean floor is Permian-Carboniferous, dated at 290-300 million years old. That's almost a third of a billion years old. But even if the oldest ocean floor was 100 years old, wouldn't say anything about whether Earth grows or not.
It doesn't, by the way.
ScienceWars 1 month ago 2
bull pewy
jakemorris111 1 month ago
EVERYONE! before you watch this video, watch the video "Expanding earth my ass" by potholer54. don't let this guy convince you otherwise.
CHUBBLE117 1 month ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@CHUBBLE117 explain to me the reason as to why the earth in the middle of the ocean is millions of years younger than the outside of the ocean. :) kthnx.
dirint 1 week ago
@CHUBBLE117 I did, and it is composed by some guy with a dogmatic bible up his ass !!
Andrewlohbihler 17 hours ago
You should just stop wasting your time on this, i bet if you focused all your efforts on your comics rather than trying to support this absurd theory. You could probably make enough money to retire. I have a feeling you make a regular attendance of the rumour mill sites instead of taking the actual university lectures. But alas seeing how you argued with others you'll simply call me a moron or something dismiss my comment and continue on with your head held high with a sense of pride.
CHUBBLE117 1 month ago
@CHUBBLE117 who the fuck died and left you inchage of the world you ass buger
datzfast 1 month ago
@datzfast no one you pretentious dick. now we're even in regards to irrational insults. I was getting across that to those who aren't as informed in the geological field who may fall victim to these false theories i threw my two cents in and requested everyone to watch that video "expanding earth my ass" <--- that's the name in order to get a better understanding.
CHUBBLE117 1 month ago
How dare you? This disgusts me. Get an education before you try and argue anything.
CHUBBLE117 1 month ago
Okay, I have a minor in geology. I've never felt more afraid for the future of humanity then after watching this video. he's based all his current "knowledge" off simply squishing the landmasses together and saying "ta-dah!" excuse me sir, what right do you have to simply dismiss 200 years of geological discovery for such an absurd accusation that the earth grows?! There not only is subduction, but there accumilation of sedimentation! its what built the grand canyon!
CHUBBLE117 1 month ago
I love satire :)
sgtreef 1 month ago
Liberals evolved from gonads.
Ipostle 2 months ago
@Ipostle Republicans evolved into gonads.
ScienceWars 1 month ago
the video doesn't show well what "goes on" in the Pacific coast! how does Australia end up fitting between Asia and America?? at first I thought the coast of Australia would fit with the western coast of Peru and Chile
qiovanni 2 months ago
would it surprise any of you that Niel Adams is a comic book artist for DC. This guy has an imagination, thats how he makes his living. but none of this needs to be taken seriously. There isn't anything legitimate about this. it fails to account for the existance of water, it disregards fossil evidence, and physics and reality. think on this, if the world was expanding, it would be getting progressively less and less dense. as such, gravity would be getting measurably weaker. but its is not.
fretlessbass26 2 months ago
452 DELUDED morons came here and watched a TRUTHFUL video.
GanEdenVideo 2 months ago
@GanEdenVideo
And comic-book artists are known for their grasp on reality.
dudev 2 months ago 3
@dudev Then why post here moron?? Pity the truth is too hard for you.
GanEdenVideo 2 months ago
@GanEdenVideo
People who are interested in real science don't throw around the word "truth" as if it were some kind of spiritual revelation. And I posted because America is already drowning in enough unsupported pseudo-scientific rubbish. Are you afraid of real science?
dudev 2 months ago
@dudev 'real science' says we evolved from apes....what a joke.
GanEdenVideo 2 months ago
@GanEdenVideo
No, real science --all the evidence--says we are apes. But perhaps a magic man in the sky waved his magic penis and made the human race. Is that more plausible or less of a joke?
dudev 2 months ago 2
@GanEdenVideo But coincidentally, it wasn't this particular video, because this video is full of shit.
Quartrez 1 month ago
Yup - I agree...
xtraflo 2 months ago
I saw this video, and I loled
unharmonix 2 months ago
EXPLAIN THE SCIENCE EXPERIMENT THAT HAD A LASER SHOOT A LAVA ROCK, AT THE SAME TEMP AS THE SUN WOULD THE EARTH. THIS EXPERIMENT SHOWED A CRUST FORM A MOVE AROUND THE MAGMA WHILE IN THE VERY CENTER WAS A CRYSTAL BALL. TELL HOW YOU EXPLAIN THIS WITH YOUR THEORY???
MrBLUEDAWG 3 months ago
OH NO NOT ANOTHER NEAL ADAMS FAN...LMAO!!
MrBLUEDAWG 3 months ago
Northern light is spacestuff that makes earth grow i think.
Now much northen-lights so we might expect increase in vulcanic activity and earthquakes.
Maybe snake bites tail is symbolic for earthcycles, snakes shift skin and grows little bigger. extra aware and think about where we life in these times of change i think.
ArjunaTulasi 3 months ago
How did life start in the ocean if there was no ocean?
JonathanTheGreat09 3 months ago
@JonathanTheGreat09 There was no life when there was no ocean, life started in the ocean when the ocean appeared,. First ocean then life.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi The life started inside first and migrated thru oceans outside where it adapted to the harsh conditions, compared with the inner ones. Inside it was only day time like sunrise all the time, no winds, constant temperature, right humidity, perfect environment for life. Why do you think we still need sun-glasses, clothes, back-pain problems and born blank as a hard-drive just ready to be formatted.
scaloi 3 months ago
whoa dude you had to smash the shit our of Alaska and Iceland didn't you.
twizelby 3 months ago
it's funny cus life actually started in the oceans, not on land.....
and btw we can even proove that the north- & southpoles are moving around!
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad yes u are right, but the inner oceans not the outside ones.And magnetic poles they moved because of the expansion.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi what inner and outside oceans? don't tell me there are oceans in the middle of earth....
and the poles moving because of expansion.. how should that work?
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad Not in the middle but on the crust which is aprox. 600-to 800 mi. thick . The so called iron core is in the middle of this crust , also the gravity center is there. In the center of the earth there is a gravity pull sun, not a nuclear reaction sun.The crust has on both sides oceans and continents.The crust was at the beginning much thicker but because of this expansion due to gravity pull got thinner and continues to get thinner thus expanding the earth without adding any mass.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi so the earth is growing in size but not in weight? is it hollow then? and why are there mountains on the surface then?
you say there's a sun in the middle of earth?
and still, which is the inner and which the outer ocean?
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad Mountains, continents and oceans are on both sides of the crust. Imagine the crust as a sponge with water in it, you don't see the water, but the moment you start to squeeze it you'll see the water on both sides. The crust was between 600-800 miles and now is aprox. 120-200mi.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi are you suggesting earth is a disc with two sides?
and the crust will eventually dry out? by which force is the movement of the crust driven?
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad The earth it's a hollow sphere, with continents and oceans on outside and inside, floating on magma who is located between outer and inner side. This magma is the gravity line and is attracting both sides, thus by modifying it's thickness you'll get an expansion without any need to add mass.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi HAHAHAHAHA SO YOU THINK EARTH IS A BALLOON LOOL XD
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad yes like an iron core sponge balloon if you want to called balloon, I called sphere. The balloon needs to be inflated in order to keep a sphere shape, while earth didn't inflate but expanded by itself from the gravitational force.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi haha you're making fun of me right?
well, what's the force expanding the earth then?
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad Not at all, the force is the gravitation that pulls both sides together for billions of years and is making the crust thinner, like the balloon when you inflate it it's walls gets thinner and thinner.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi haha your stupidity is endless lool
gravitation would make that balloon shrink or collapse!!
or believing in your theory i could dig into earth and start a life on the inner side of the crust?
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
@DaMastaOfRoad Don't have to dig, all you need is a connection to a government control opening. You are a perfect example of a society obey-er, and modern witch killer, you better start drinking wine from a lead cup like Romans and maybe you'll be able to multiply two Roman numerals, or joint my campaign to ban hydric acid the No.1 killer of babies and children.
scaloi 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@scaloi hahaha you just said you're a witch
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
Seems legit.
ICryWhenICum 3 months ago
what is this i dont even
Magmacano 3 months ago
LOLOLOL so how do you explain earthquakes?!!
akkappul 3 months ago
fuckin LOL this has to be a joke
MrJivePirate 3 months ago
you're an idiot.
lenuge 3 months ago
Who cares what the stupid plates do... LEAVE EARTH!!!
flashbuilding 4 months ago
You guys do realize that liquid expands when it freezes. The core of the earth is molten lava (liquid) which is cooling into solid rock. By simple observation, we can determine that the earth is expanding just like water does when it freezes.
stickfigkill 4 months ago
@stickfigkill You realize that property is unique to water, and possibly a few other substances, don't you? The majority of substances shrink when hardening
CorrespondingReality 4 months ago
@stickfigkill The vast majority of liquids actually contract, or become more dense when they transition into solid phase. Water ice is one of very few exceptions to this rule; the water ice formed at below 0C at standard atmospheric pressure has a crystalline structure which keeps the molecules further apart than in the liquid form.
photoklarno 3 months ago
This theory makes no sense. Where would the extra mass come from to allow for the earth to grow?
bushbasher42 4 months ago
@bushbasher42 There is no extra mass. Just a change on density. I think the reason for the expansion was the washing off by the solar wind of an ancient and very thick Jupiter-like atmosphere. That atmosphere hold the water that currently is on the oceans.
FMMAROTO 4 months ago
@FMMAROTO That doesn't work though. You need mass to be larger. A change in density won't increase it's size.
bushbasher42 4 months ago
@bushbasher42 Density is mass per volume. If you keep the mass constant and change the density, you necessarily change the volume.
Exisaasrkog 3 months ago
@Exisaasrkog But what accounts for the change in density? There needs to be some sort of mechanism driving it.
bushbasher42 3 months ago
Well, You see the deep huge expansive fissures at the bottom of the oceans; how can you explain them?
albertsneijMD 4 months ago
@albertsneijMD The deep fissures in the ocean floor are where the sea floor is destroyed and created, which is the mechanism for plate tectonics.
bushbasher42 3 months ago
if there were no oceans, where did all the water come from?
seanncali 4 months ago 6
@seanncali The Flood.
GanEdenVideo 2 months ago
@seanncali There was one huge shallow sea, covering ALL of the planet. That is why the oldest fossils of sea creatures are found ON THE LAND. It USED to be the sea floor.
Rumpl4skn 1 month ago
@seanncali GOD
Quartrez 1 month ago
@seanncali A huge comet, thats kinda how it works. Would help fuel the theory seeing as how planets are essentially masses of space debris.
CalisCool 1 month ago
I like to reduce everything to Heat. Like all roads lead to Rome, everyone wants to find energy sources, but eventually you examine what is done with any energy, and that is to produce Heat. Heat the Water, move the machine, make Electricity, and then Heat the House, In the end, we seek not Energy , but Heat Sources. Universally, everything is made of Heat. What is Heat ? I say it is "The Wrath of God" !!! Time may be more related to Heat Loss , than related to Light Speed.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
The only sense of expansion means, not to add more material or energy , but to space out the particles further and further, and that approaches the Dark Space Energy Field, as Matter moves less and less Heat. Eventually the furthest expansion would be to the extent out of the Big Bang, that the Field of Space as a material fabric, can express a movement . Space itself is a force field much stranger than photon energy or light. Space is not the Void, Space moves through the Void
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
I just learned of Earth expanding , few months ago; and found it to make sense. But you have to add to it the concept of NEW MATTER AND ENERGY formation, over the millions of years, to be complete.
albertsneijMD 4 months ago
@albertsneijMD "NEW MATTER AND ENERGY formation" <- Defies the first law of thermodynamics.
brianoc10 4 months ago
@brianoc10 FirstI have to know if you accept/recognize the concept/theory of Earth expanding.
albertsneijMD 4 months ago
@albertsneijMD I recognise the concept but don't agree, it contradicts too many proven facts.
ulmusicsoc 4 months ago
If the Earth expanded /is expanding, one must explain the new matter and water that is needed/ necessary for the Earth to expand. My Theory is , just as we accept the concept of Black Hole, in which mater and light are pulled in, to disappear. In a mirror fassion, we can see a tunnel between the Black Hole and center of the Earth, in which same matter come back; or it might be NEW matter, altogether. You do not see it scientific, well , you are in for a surprise. I just learned of Earth expan
albertsneijMD 4 months ago
bullshit...
rotzi1988 4 months ago
Why is this virtual world spinning in the opposite direction to that of the real world?
1:56 65 million years ago? So how & when did all the sea water arrive?
PhilDobson2010 4 months ago
according to the Hubble Constant, the rate of Universal Inflation the Laws determining how much Mass is possible in the same space, is likely to be re calibrated like the sliding parts of the old Slide Ruler used for Trigonometry. As the Hubble Constant and Special Relativity change the Universe then the same mass should also expand in any place in the Universe as a reaction overall to Cosmology. The very space inside the atom would expand if the Universe is Inflating itself.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
@CarmineFragione But relative to the universe as a whole, it would remain the same size and be immeasurable (as such).
brianoc10 4 months ago
@brianoc10 It would seem so, that the same rising tide or volumetric expansion would be no one could sense the relative change. But if the Laws of the Universe have a tipping point at various benchmarks of Universal Expansion, then Revolutionary Change would occur, and we have no study to predict what changes , but I would expect that "Heat" is going to behave radically in increasing empty space. The Void is Antithetical to Matter and Energy, it is the great unknown .
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
Hilariously funny.
dirtydonki 4 months ago
"NASA Research Confirms it’s a Small World, After All" - Google this report, less than a month old.
"...a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth"
Case closed? Any thoughts Neal?
MagicStickUK 4 months ago 3
@MagicStickUK I think that the study was done in a short period that failed to detect any expansion.May be "expansion" can be measured, only in 10 years, 100 years or even 1000 years
albertsneijMD 4 months ago
@albertsneijMD absolute rubbish. The earth is either expanding or it is not. If it was happening it wouldn't slow down or speed up it would be a steady rate. This theory states that the earth is expandDING not expanDED. NASA's study is part of a world wide effort and blows a whole straight to the heart of this theory. It cannot be ignored.
MagicStickUK 4 months ago
@MagicStickUK Nasa said "significant" and "statistically" one means they found expansion, second means in the last 10 years.
scaloi 3 months ago
@scaloi You are wrong. Please read the study.
MagicStickUK 3 months ago
@MagicStickUK how long have we had instruments that can measure things like this, versus how old is the earth.. To completely abandon this theory is a stupid thing to do. And to completely abandon techtonics is also stupid. In this video i see clearly both theories in motion.. Plates are moving and growing. If the universe is expanding as NASA claims, the moon is getting further away, then is it so hard to believe the planet has also gotten larger since the first 2 rocks collided with eachother
painterjohn512 2 months ago
@painterjohn512 It's hard to believe for countless reasons. Just one of the reasons (and one that I don't hear lot on these threads) is:
If the earth did expand as much as this theory implies then there would have been a considerable change in the earths orbit around the sun over this time of expansion. (I'd love to to the math on this if Neal could tell us what he thinks the min size the earth has been). It would mean the moons orbit would have changed drastically too.
MagicStickUK 2 months ago
@painterjohn512 The changes in both these orbits could have been disastrous. Not just for our climate but also (possibly (again, need to do the math)) causing the earth's - and/or - moon's orbit to become unstable.
Again. I point out just one of the countless arguments that make this theory questionable. To be nice about it.
MagicStickUK 2 months ago
@painterjohn512 @painterjohn512 Alos. Your point about "How long have we had instruments like this" shows that you didn't read the study, and has a small grasp of the scientific method. If you have a certain about of data points of a relatively small period of time. You can draw a line through these points and extend them in both directions. Which allows to to make predictions on past and future data points. You don't have to measure 'absolute zero' to know when it would occur....
MagicStickUK 2 months ago
@MagicStickUK that does not mean the theory is incorrect. Drawing a line between points and measuring them doesnt mean the area hasnt, or will ever move. It simply means during the time of the study the points havent moved.. The surface around a volcano may not move for centuries until the last few years before an eruption.. yet it moved, and just because it moved X amount doesnt mean it will continue to move. Predictions are guesses, nothing more. Insulting my "grasp" on things is not needed
painterjohn512 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@painterjohn512 So is this theory called "The Expanding Earth Theory" or "The Expanded Earth Theory"? As much as I can agree with what you are saying here, this doesn't agree with Neal proposed mechanism for how the earth is expanding. He is the one that says it will continue.
MagicStickUK 2 months ago
Also, the moons orbit HAS changed, and is CONSTANTLY changing. The moons size has changed since its begining, each time something impacts it it changes, just like the early Earth did. And I dont know about the math, but the Earths orbit has changed, there have been several studies on this. The events that caused out planet to rotate at an angle on its axis had enough force to alter our orbit. Again several studies on this.. most are theories, but they seem plausible to me, but what do I know
painterjohn512 2 months ago
I think you missed my point completely.. You were very quick to attempt to prove some higher level of intellegence over me. No i didnt read the study.. another smug narrow minded asshole probably wrote that too. My point was HUMANS which you are one of, can only guess as to what the true history of our planet is, since none of us were there to witness it. Science, Tools, etc etc can help make the guesses more accurate, but not exact
painterjohn512 2 months ago
@painterjohn512 It wasn't one person who wrote the study. It was a world wide effort.
And again, we cannot "only guess". We can study, gain data, make predictions on that data, if a prediction turns out to be validated by other data we can presume our initial hypotheses is valid. This is how science works. Yes, it may not be EXACT, but its better than looking a a globe and saying "I'd bet my left nut that the earth expanded. Why? Because it did, thats why"
I don't mean to sound harsh.
MagicStickUK 2 months ago
For the idiots...this video is suggesting the theory that earth is a growing planet. Which already makes a lot more sense than the big bang theory, which has a ton of flaws, and something is obviously up because this image of a smaller earth, and the continental plates fit together PERFECTLY. Scientists obviously will not accept and deny this more accurate theory though because that would mean that all of their hard work would have been totally wrong and they would have to start from scratch.
l0rdslayer 5 months ago
@l0rdslayer you're having a laugh right?
MagicStickUK 4 months ago
earth does expand because all matter in existence expands at the same rate. you have the inside of the earth and the outside expanding at different rates. simple minded. If you can understand the latest m theory or string theory this would be a given...
jofus3456 5 months ago
Always watch the whole world! acquire the global viewpoint! And fly to the end of the space! Be united with God! Lead to the acme of the narcism indulgence.
常に世界全体を見よ！！グローバル視点を身に付けろ！！そして宇宙の果てへ飛べ！！神と一体になれ！！自己陶酔耽溺の極致に至れ。
wizardmori 5 months ago
@nealadamsdotcom Finished thinking now... what you present is codswallop, bunkum, balderdash. Unscientific nonsense, complete tripe. I find it sad that so many people - like yourself - are willing to set aside scientific scepticism, and instead invest their belief in utter tog which hasn't presented any *real* evidence; and at the same time will just take a sniff at a million pieces of scientific evidence that point (with almost complete accord) to something completely different!
tsuchan1 5 months ago
When people don't found a sense to their life they invent conspiracies like this shit
InfamousBasterds 5 months ago
doesn't plants transform solar energy into matter?? I bet that some of the solar energy gets trap in earth and it's transformed into matter, and what about meteorite showers, which most of them have water on it. in my opinion earth is growing but very slow, it should be like 1.5 bigger in about 2 billion years. just a guess.
Mezcal2008 5 months ago
In fact does plants not transform light into matter, they store the energy chemically in carbohydrates (sugar) the matter is already there.
Also it takes huge amounts of energy to create matter, to create 1kg of matter you would need (according to Einstein) 1J * the speed of light the speed of light, that is 90000000000000000J.
and if the mass had come from meteors, and there is no subduktion we would stand on a few 1000 km of them.
esbendit 5 months ago
@esbendit you left me thinking about what you said, you said that "it takes huge amounts of energy to create matter", maybe that's one of the main functions of black holes, to turn energy into matter, but there is a problem, what would happen to the matter that gets in? ? ? we may need a century or more before we know it.
Mezcal2008 4 months ago
this would mean fossils got stretched and dinosaurs are not that big!
TheKcTy 5 months ago
@TheKcTy your retarded
rtljmc 5 months ago
Even though any theory can be debunked and the debunker can be debunked ,and so on , its an interesting theory , but its a sad thing for the man behind the theory getting called an idiot by another idiot.....
MrPulpfiction55 5 months ago
Search on the JPL.NASA website for the article "NASA Research Confirms it's a Small World, After All". A team of researchers from around the world "detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth". boooom baby! ;)
Orbionify 5 months ago
umm well tell me where the bones went? i'm not for or aginst this theory because i just heard about it and am looking into it. But please do tell me why the bones don't match up with this theory? again i am not for or aginst i just want to know.
ragmondead 5 months ago
If the earth expands...or continues to expand, what happens to it's density and gravity?
Blazenresearcher 5 months ago
@Blazenresearcher well they say (i dont have an opinion on it) thats why dinosaurs grew so large. now comets and meteors are constantly hitting the earth making it larger(in fact there is a meteor shower tonight). so earth is growing. now the argument is how much has it grown since the formation of the moon (when we hit a differnt planet) truthfully i think the pangia theory is correct, but only a fool would blindly accept everything they hear.
ragmondead 5 months ago
@ragmondead Thanks for the reply! Peace!
Blazenresearcher 5 months ago
were did all the water come from than? other than that i like this theory it makes sence to me and i think explains how mars is a pre-earthlike world unlike venus which is a post-earthlike world
laviliterthefirst 5 months ago