Global Individual Sovereignty Information Manifold

[GBlues1]

This is my question. I am not a physicist, or a even a college educated man, but if the world around us is dependent on the reality that we choose to see, then why aren't there people running around like I don't know, neo, from the matrix, or spider-man, or a guy like from the movie jumper who can teleport anywhere they want. IF they make that there reality......then......why the whole matrix thing and it being real in that way never made sense to me......

[capnarness]

@GBlues1 Libet experiments show cortex "decision-making" areas light up before one makes a choice, indicating simulated free will. Hawking et al mainstream materialism multi-universe (random chance) theory should have glitches. Monte Carlo (random test) simulation of Hawking et al universe splitting-off into new universes, and new physical constants, at every point of spacetime has 1/(infinity^infinite) chance (essentially zero chance) of maintaining present or future life experience coherence.

[cosmicordering1]

Great to see this in action!

[kcjenner1]

At about 6:15 you state, "otherwise the paper can go no further". Could you explain this a little more?

I don't know if this is related, but I remember reading that regarding the symmetry of particles there is no anit-photon. Am I remembering this correctly?

[capnarness]

@kcjenner1 In free PDF of the paper, every quantum energy state is associated with a GEM continuum configuration state...so that energy is calculated same as probability and mass, by integrating a density function throughout a volume. Hence, where h=6.62606896 10-34 J s, a 1 sec period photon GEM eigenvectors must integrate to 6.62606896 10-34 J eigenvalue "otherwise the paper can go no further." Maple worksheet verification qualifies as a discovery, I believe.

[kcjenner1]

@capnarness I have been studying the PDF since I downloaed it. I made a typo-error in my first comment. I meant to write ANTI-photon. And maybe it is relevant because from you PDF one thing that caught my eye was the light to light verses matter to matter strengths was different.

Isn't the microlensing similar to the double-slit problem?

[capnarness]

@kcjenner1 In the standard model the photon is its own anti-particle.

No, the double-slit experiment is the basis for the Copenhagen Interpretation that electrons and photons are neither strictly waves or particles, but a quantum mechanical system depending on the conscious choices made by the experimenter. Hence the idealism interpretation of the minority, the physical world is emergent of consciousness.

Microlensing problem is where parallel beams should curve space and attract, but do not.