have you guys heard about the brand-new wow hacks on wowcheatsYnet (replace Y with . ) ? i find it difficult to believe they are giving them away totally free. in most cases that sort of information is only on the super secret underground sites.
u half wits are missing the point, its not that the vaccines are bad, its what they put in the vaccines, no one is disputing that vaccines can save lives and do eradicate terrible illnesses , its what they are putting in the damn vaccines. no one says food is bad for you, yet there are so many chemicals and shit in it that make pple obese, its like u morons take the argument flip it and twist it to make pple who question the norm sound nuts , maybe u should start questioning shit BAH BAH SHEEEP
I'd like to see independent evidence that any one vaccine is safe. Why do we even need vaccines? Why not educate people on developing a healthy immune system and educating on correct sanitation? Why do egunecists and other globalists encourage vaccinations? In their own words and docs they stated it was to sterilize (reduce population). I find it sad that people think vaccines are good. They don't produce a natural immune response. Just get healthy and most of your worries are gone. Simple.
*Studies which have been done are not designed to eliminate the examiners bias. Authorities who compile and report disease statistics work closely with and have a vested interest in companies which produce the vaccines. In other industries, this kind of bias is not tolerated. Injuries and deaths in these studies are attributed to anything but vaccination to skew the results and make it appear that vaccines have some merit.
sherry tenpenny is an idiot. she has ZERO qualification in any science. She is not qualified to talk about anything related to health. she is a known quack:
Quackwatch org
i am tired of your ignorance. if you prefer to be gulible enough to buy crap, so do it. when you get some education inside that little head you'll see how much of a fool you are.
you idiots are all the same: ignorance and total dumb. you can't grasp science: therefore you kill people.
Again, look at the lack of credibility the pharma and government has. Time and time again. Funny you cannot deny this...it's in the public record. But you choose to ignore what you don't want to believe. Again, most of the UN panel aren't scientists, many who are/and aren't disagree with the panels findings and have withdrawn, the panel were given the executive summary prior to any research and the terms of reference conveniently fail to question the sun as a probable cause. It's political!
You're denying that statistics and data cannot be manipulated to show a desired outcome. That is naive. How many times have i read about control groups been manipulated to suit an outcome, researches being pressured to show a certain outcome (i.e. executive summary prepared before any studies), and serious key facts left out of reports/research terms of reference. This is all matter of fact. You deny this. Naive. Keep drinking your healthy fluoride water and prozac tabs. Corruption doesnt exist
I am denying nothing you are. PLease tell...how can the data of more than 20 different countries, of papers made by 20 different teams, with thousands of different people. Done randomly and controlled, put to scrutiny and verified by peers... survive if it was manipulated? Wakefield tried that and look how easy it was to expose him as a fraud.
You the naive bugger with no idea about the scientific method.
So now its fluoride? lol...can you prove it does bad? no
Why is fluoride not recommended for consumtion to little kids or baby's? I mean in toothpaste. Why shouldn't a child swallow the toothpaste? Dentists tell you it is only for topical use. Fluoride has never been found to adversely effect the brain and body? Why did the Russian's use flouride in the gulag camps drinking water? Again, most of the research is flawed. Sad but true that we cannot trust it. No credibility.
there was never such thing recommended. What is not recomended is to give water with higher concentrations that 1,2mg/L of fluoride until age 6.
In the toothpaste is not recommended that they swallow it. But even then... there is no such evidence of harm. It's a precaution. There is no epidemic of Dental fluorosis in ages lower than 6.
Dentists say there is a higher benefit if in topical use.
again: toxicity of any chemical: IS DOSE RELATED!!!
you fail to provide which research is flawed. You just making empty claims with nothing to back you up. your ignorance is astonishing.
The scientific consensus of the 60s still stands. If we keep with the global warming the consequence will be a global cooling with an iceage following. Science is not wrong about that. hence the warnings.
What engineers are you talking about? none of ofc.
I'm assuming you're NOT religious, because there is no proof or data that Jesus or anyone existed. The bible and other religions are based on frauds. It's a conspiracy and most of the world's people have fallen for it...including scientists. Double standards, lol
The two are related...shows your double standards. You believe the stories of bible and religion, yet there is NO evidence. And at the very least, peer reviewed evidence. lol
There is just one of many examples of the public believing 911 is a coverup. look at how popular the consipracy dvd and youtube movies are, even though they are being censored! LOL.
Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story
Only 16% now believe official fable according to New York Times/CBS News poll
Scientific Poll was the headline. No truth to the poll...you're refuting it, that it was never taken? It's a conspiracy? lol. You science crowd are so narrow minded. Let me remind you that the scientific consensus in 60's was global cooling and the coming iceage.....lol. Science is never wrong is it. How about the hundreds of engineers around the world who petitioned for answers to the collapse of Word Trade Centre 7 and the other two towers? They think it's suss. Conspiracy theorists hey...
*There are no control group studies. Authorities consider that "to not vaccinate" is unethical and have refused to study unvaccinated volunteers. If control studies were done according ' to honest science, vaccination would be outlawed.
Like i said earlier, big pharma and govt have lost alot of credibility over the years due to their lies, coverups, motives...they are those who stand to gain and with much more to lose. I have witnessed this on a personal level in my industry.
bah...and then you posted another fine example of a anti-science moron being born in your person...
conspiracy theory is your path.
I await your 9/11 nonsense in a few weeks. or maybe aids denialism? who knows? the moment a dumb person like you stops wanting to learn and just deny reality, anything is possible.
I am now convinced you're brainwashed by modern medicine and mainstream media propoganda. The fact you deny 911 inside job is laughable. I would eat you alive in that debate. The 911 Commission report was fraudulent...another example why most people don't trust government, pharma etc. The mass populations are waking up to the lies. Just the same with climate change. Fraudulent reports again, terms of reference fail to investigate many natural causes. Lies = no credibility = public distrust
For the record; you're in the minority if you don't believe 911 was an inside job. Yes, your subconscious is brainwashed from mainstream media. You don't have to watch tv 5 hours a day to be. It's all around you. Again, time and time again throughout history - including science - people like you called others with different views conspiracy theorists, and time and time again people like you have been proven wrong. Again, you seem to have no rebutle for my credibility argument. lol (sheep)
"in a minority"? lol..based upon what? the little voices in your head?
NO, people like you call man of science crazy and used to burn them. and time and time again LAY people like you are the ones who kill, destroy and keep being losers who contribute ZERO to society.
what argument do you have? zero, you failed to support any of your claims. And I DID support mine.
cya, sheep, keep buying the conspiracy labeled products.
Have you read the official 911 report? I think not, because you would've known there are huge holes in it! You think everything is a coincidence....by your standard no-one would ever be charged with a crime! Again, i know first hand and from previous judgements, admissions, whistle-blowers, declassfied documents etc that pharma, governments have lied to the public and in their reports, their statistics, data etc. I gave you clear cut examples of profit & politics trying to influence outcomes.
the entire hundreds of page report? no. I am also not a civil engeneer. Are you? can you understand all those graphs of the physics of the accident? well, i can, not fully ofc. But i understand quite a lot of math and have some engeneer firends.
I see very small holes in the report.
Everything IS a coincidence, or better put: nothing is. But i call it a random universe for a reason.
By my standards people are charged when they are guilty, not when they can't be proved guilty.
All that you claim is nothing but ad hominem. You must adress the subject at hand. and don't let previous events to manipulate the way you produce a conclusion. Or by your standards i should call you a killer, a rapist or a thief. Because most of the australians are descendents of such type of individuals.
You failed to provide me any example related to vaccinesor the video at hand Mainly by two reasons you are already wrong:
I now can really see you for what you are, courtesy of your poor behaviour and insults. What does that say about the person you are?? People who love others and love themselves don't resort to your low standard. Immature.
Immature? lol... said the man shouting conspiracy fantasy to me. AHAHAH
get real. You have ZERO evidence against immunizations. While i provided you with plenty in favour of vaccines and their safety.
you want to deny it? you want to stay ignorant? fine. when morons like you reach court you lose due to your ignorance. you just to dumb to figure science, hence you don't even try to understand.
get real, my insults is me getting bored by another conspiracy wacko
I provided you with websites to resources and studies. You ridicule people for exercising their right to freedom and to question things. I remind you, conspiracy theorists (people who question things) have exposed many things and have been proven to be right throughout history. You don't seem a happy person...from your behaviour i don't think you like yourself.
6 of the 10 commissioners in the 911 report have publicly spoken out against it stating that it is flawed, that the official govt story is different to the facts. This is on record. There are hundreds of architects and engineers who also have publicly stated the same position. But these statements mean little to you because you don't want to believe it because it may distort your perfect view of the world. You live in a bubble. lol. I gave you the websites with links to the resources - READ THEM
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
well... all a lot of incredible claims and not even one single reference to support your claims about 911. I will claim this: you are a liar. All the comissioners support the reports given. There are hundreds of architects and engineers who publicly stated that they agree with the reports. it's not a question of "belief", its a matter of FACT. you failed to present any reference for your claims.
try give me proper websites. anedoctal claims are useless.
The evidence is all over the net. It's all there at your fingertips should you wish to see it. The fact you try and dodge my claims by telling me to supply references when it is at your fingertips - clearly shows your reluctance to challenge your belief system. Again, google 911 Commissioner Max Cleland resigns over 911 coverup, in which a total of 6 out of 10 commission members stated it was a coverup. And answer all the simple questions the government won't answer. What are they hiding? Hmmm
Too many people bury their head in the sand and fail to read the CFR, UN, Government documents and those of other world leaders/persons of infuence in government, medicine and business as they relate to their sick views on medicine, eugenics etc. I'm not the one making it up - read their own documents. Read John Holdrens (Obama science czar) "Ecoscience" book or Kissingers "UN State Memo 200." Read Rothchild's and Rockefellers memos (the people who founded the institution of modern medicine)...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
eugenics? AHAHAHA just tell... if there is an "eugenics secret movement"...why do people live longer, young deaths have decreased and therefore we are more and more people each year? your eugenics movement is doing a very poor poor job...
you idiot. Medicine is the biggest anti-eugenics thing that there can be. Vaccines oppose such possibilities of eugenics.
i read part of all those things. you ignoranct morons just put everything out of context. you a bunch of dumb people afraid of the sky
Actually, in the Western world people aren't neccesarily living longer. Depends on the data you're using and whether you're taking into account the infant mortality rates. Again, people need to be wary of the terms of reference. Are you denying Holdren's book is related to eugenics?? Wow. Read these peoples own documents - i'm not making it up - they're the ones stating these sick things. Not my words but theirs. You haven't even read any of these documents because it is an inconvenient truth!
The UN has meddled with life expactancy data and infant mortality rates for years. I am referring to the last 50 years in western countries. Not 200 years. Lastly, "official" data is not always credible as the system, the beaurocrats, govt, pharma, bio med industry has lost most of it's credibility. I don't need data to tell me that. People aren't stupid, hence why there is a growing number of people against vaccines. Thousand of health professionals believe latest swine flu vaccine is unsafe
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"meddled"? lololol
not credible? says who? the conspiracy idiot? ahahahaha
don't be a joke, you just need to go to a hospital and ask for the written records. Or the church even. You telling me that you don't need "data", is proof that you are a stupid person. end of
Yeah, because the courts have integrity. Hmm, George Bush really one the 2000 election!! To believe the courts and judges are acting in the publics best interests is baloney. Corruption is all well and good in modern USA.
What ended Polio, TB etc? Vaccines or better hydeine, sanitation, health education, practices etc? Why has time and time again vaccinated populations had a higher incidence of disease for which they were vaccinated than those who were not vaccinated? Has anyone ever died from vaccines related complications? Have big pharma and governments always been honest with the public? Are they free of corruption? Who funds most research and journals? Who do doctors really work for - drug co or patients?
well, that is an outright lie. In fact. vaccinated populations have a lower incidence of disease for which they were vaccinated. just compare vaccination rates in diferent countries vs disease vaccines prevent against.
no one has ever died due to a vaccine in the last 30 years. But unvaccinated people have died by the thousands of polio, TB, whooping cough,....
corruption or whatever argument you choose that involves ad hominem, are not proof against vaccines.
Really? No one has ever died due to a vaccine related complication, wow! I wonder why the swine flu vaccine was pulled off the market in the 70's then...apparently people were dying after taking the shot. And what role does santitation, hygeine, general health play in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations data? Why does the data show that whooping cough, polio, tb...rates were approx 90% down when vaccines were introduced? Can we really credit vaccines with this decline in these diseases?
I asked you to name one death in the last 30 years due to a vaccine. We are in 2009, this goes until 1979. Before that the tech for vaccines was different. And even then more people died with no vaccines than if they had vaccines.
the swine flu vaccine of the time was pulled due to two correlational episodes with no proven casuality. even then more than 40 million people were vaccinated in the US. btw... it was one death that was tied to the vaccine. with no proof of causality.
bu then the epidemic was over and it was deemed that the vaccine progrma for that disease could stop.
wanna know how much vaccination vs unvaccinated are when put to the test? ok, number deaths to polio in the US and then compare it to India, check vaccination rates.
I dare you to present that data you claim. Because it is a lie promoted by anti-vaxers crap websites. when put to scrutiny they are all proven lies.
We can credit vaccines to increase in life expectancy and low young death rates.
medical journals are like any other magazine, except that the best ones don't have any publicity related to possible conflicts of interest.
most research is paid by pharma in terms of drugs. But a lot more is not paid by pharma. namely biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, microbiology, a lot of that is not pharma giving the money. they don't want it to. because that exposes their flaws.
If i treat 1, 10 or 1000000 patients i'll receive the same.
So who funds these people? Who are their clients? These researches, did any ever work in big pharma. Are these government run programs? It is quite naive to think that there is no influence. History shows this whether it be in big pharma or government. Both lack credibility, hence why the people are fedup with congress and big companies i.e. banks, big phamra, insurance...oh yeah, and it helps that i know people in the or who had worked in the industry.
The NIH funds researchers using taxpayers money. The "clients" being the general public or specific groups. Fact is most of researchers don't work for pharma. And that is not a good argument against the ones who do work for pharam.
if you accuse "lack of credibility", who has credibility to you? do you need it that you give the money directly and the research is done in the middle of the desert? LOL :P
ok ok, big pharma, governments have never lied to the public or anyone about serious issues. Never cooked stats or studies to suit what would benefit them. You know you maybe right. No corruption exists in society and never has because "I, myself" cannot prove it. Everything is a coincidence and all the people (the general public and healthcare professionals, MD's, doctors, whistleblower etc) claiming that vaccines can be harmful are conspiracy theorists.
i never said we were never lied to. What i do mean is why should that be an argument against future claims? you must look into each claim independently. Using past events to try support another unrelated one is a logical falacy.
The scientific method puts all studies and stats to scrutiny. that avoids scientific fraud. It may happen, but is difficult to.
I dare you to present one MD that has provided evidence against vaccines. just one.
You seem to know more than me, what has Dr Russell Blaylock MD provided? He would appear (from his resume) to be someone with a high level of expertise in neurological science...i think Dr Andrew Moulden is another person. Then again, i haven't been researching this topic for long.
Dr Russel Blaylock is a neurosurgeon. Not neurologist., I say this because he has the entire community of neurology association against his claims.
He done experiences where he used enormsly higher concentrations of thiomersal compared to the ones used in the past (thiomersal was stopped more than 13 years ago). his studies prove toxicity is dose related and that in fact thiomersal was never given in such toxic doses. he uses his study to promote anti-vax nevertheless.
In a court of law, the judge will look at the accused history/character reference, the evidence at hand (circumstantial etc or not), possible motives, what they had to gain. Put it into the context of big pharma and you can see why the public are suss. That's my angle. But hey, everything in life may just be a coincidence...?
well, i see that you are going the anti-vax path.
i can only make one last appeal for you to at least try to understand how the immune system works. When that is explained in court, pretty much lay people in the room understand why there is no link between vax and autism.
What causes autism and why is it on the increase and why is it that coincidentally, neurological damage occurs within days of vaccinations? Any reasonable person would question the circumstantial evidence. But please enlighten me or point me in the right direction of the truth and i will happily investigate it. P.S. i used to be pro vaccine until i started researching it after my cousin developed autism within hours of vaccination. I'm open minded.
you clearly don't know what autism is. Autism has only one area of diagnose criteria: psychology. Autism is diagnose with psychological criteria: ONLY. At the moment. it takes months to evaluate a child in order to provide a diagnose.
so please tell how can that be done in "days of vaccinations"? it can't. Autism appears at the ages where vaccines are given. Some parents decided to blame vaccines, because they are ignorant.
It isn't neurological damage when your child all of a sudden cannot speak, communicate, articulate (basically acts drunk)? What is it then, i'm curious? I mean the medical world puts so many labels on things it's hard to keep up.
Well then my claim is my cousin has neurological damage, which is what i believe i did imply. Anyway, there is a good link. Or am i pushing coincidence like all the other parents?
Wouldn't any reasonable person explore the relationship between a vaccine then their child having a melt down hours later? From now on i'm not going to refer to autism but rather neurological damage - it seems to be what most anti vax doctors etc are saying. Autism and definitions, labelling makes things confusing.
Labelling seems like it gives pro vax people a way to wriggle out of sticky situations. Like the CDC and the recent court ruling (Hannah Poling). I'm referring to things as neuro damage.
She had a previous genetic condition. The common flu could have triggered her disease in her first few days of life.
Plus the court ruling was based upon a correlational factor, not due to casuality,
People with autism don't have the Poling condition. They may test all they like. Poling's disease is so rare that all cases are registred and extensively studied.
Labelling is necessary. You don't call the sun just a star.
the sun is a star..well that is what i was taught, maybe my teacher is a conspiracy theorist?! In regards to Poling, the vaccine played a major role did it not? And i'm not directly talking about Autism here. There was an adverse reaction due to taking the vaccine and a pre-existing condition. Correct? I was also curious into what long term studies go into the safety and efficacy of vaccines?
you didn't get it. Forget it, the idea is lost in the translation to english.
The vaccine played a role? how do we know? there is only a correlational link, not casual. The judge didn't even listen to all expert witness.
To understand why Hannah Poling has nothing to do with vaccines you should first learn what is the immune system. Go read about it. If you try go over the basics you'll make all the wrong assumptions that any other anti-vax loser is making.
Ok, i'll read it. I want to believe vaccines are safe. I guess it's the millions of people against them (for whatever reason), coupled with previous lies and deceptions that make me think twice about them. Just too many coincidences re deaths in vaccine trials, neurological disorders etc. And science has been wrong in the past time and time again. Also the lack of long term studies into vaccines. Furthemore, why are these makers free from liability? All reasonable questions, concerns.
i already asked for you to name one death due to vaccines in the last 30 years. There is none cabgt.... but you do have thousands of deaths in unvaccinated people due to polio, TB,....
Even if an hypothesis was wrong in the past it doesn't mean you'll find answers by rejecting science.
long term studies? vaccines have been used for more than 100 years...
Sorry, i was relating this to the tobacco industry science claims in the past. Scientists were saying smoking could be beneficial, like today scientists saying mobile phones are safe and scientists who said the world was flat. That's what i mean't about science doing backflips and cooking stats/data etc.
That example was exactly why there is more scrutiny today.
In the past it was empty claims made by the tobacco industry. They had no support for their claims. And scientists were the ones who spent decades doing studies and providing evidence that it was harmfull. It took thousand of people with problems to stop and listen to science.
you have a total misconception about science... try go look up what the scientific method is.
I thought there were scientists supporting the tobacco industry i.e. tobacco funded lots of the research, much like how pharma funds lots of research or uses known pro pharma research/scientists to head studies? Science has been wrong in the past is my point. Constant backflips. One year research says 'x' is bad for you the next year research says 'x' is good for you. The public doesn't trust anyone anymore. I'm just asking questions. Wouldn't you agree thats a good thing? (im being nice btw)
scientists can support whatever. If they don't back up their claims their opinion values close to nothing. If their research can't pass peer-review they are exposed. What happened in the past is much much harder now.
your questions when made with no background understanding of basic sciences won't let you understand the subject before after the question is answered.
do as i told you: go read what is autism, what is vaccines, why do we need them.
So why is mercury a known toxin to man if it has no effect on the human body? That is your position is it not? Why do so many doctors advise pregnant women not to eat fish, during prenancy. They state it is due to the mercury. Again, the medical industry is making it hard for themselves. Poor credibility. I don't have a science background, rather a business and history major. History one helps. My mother is a Bio-Chemist at a well-known university. My friend worked in research in big pharma.
cabgt... i am tired of this back and forth. I am tired of the amount of ignorance that people like you have.
TOXICITY IS DOSE RELATED. any chemical can be a toxin. Even molecular oxygen.
Fish contains inorganic mercury. and may have very large quantities of mercury forms.
the pharma is telling you using simple chemistry that: THIOMERSAL IS NOT MERCURY. get that in your little head. why don't you have problem with sulphur?
The state pays a part of the vaccines and is the main promotor of immunizations. Pharma loses money with vaccines, so has no interest in making vaccines.
The state assumes the responsability for any damage that might be associated with vaccines. so that pharma doesn't go down with any problem due to vaccines.
It is a kind of protection, but because we are talking about a serious health subject, we can't allow a manufacter to go down. we need them to produce vaccines.
I'll read those docs you sent me, but i have a flat-out work schedule (believe it or not, i work in the pharma industry), but in the meantime can you recommend any good videos on youtube that support vaccines? Like i said, i'd rather believe they are safe because 1) heaps of people have been vaccinated and i have to make that choice for my kids one day and 2) i work in the industry. Thanks.
1) Is an over simplification, apparently it is the cummulative effect of vaccinations that is most dangerous (build up of known toxins) & blood clotting. 2) I don't trust my company because of whistleblowers who had worked in my company in research/development/efficacy area's. Hence, why i'm online trying to get some answers. Can't find consensus. Frustrating, particularly because the science and data can be easily manipulated...unless you read all the studies word for word you cant trust them
If you want to be technical it is both circumstantial and correlational when you take into account other people's accounts of the same nature. Both can be submitted in court and taken seriously. I'm lying, like the thousands of other people who claim the same situation? So what caused this apparent damage to my cousin and the thousands of other kids? Are all these people and other doctors, scientists just conspiracy theorists? Because they question things? More questions then answers is the case
"people's accounts" alone are what is called: "anedoctal claims": they value ZERO has evidence.
i found out that most parents don't even know what autism is. I also found out most parents can't tell the difference between autism and PDD-NOS. so in the middle of "thousands" we actually have diverse pathologies claimed to be caused by vaccines.
And what doctors are you talking about? name one that has presented any evidence against vaccines. please present a paper that was peer-reviewed.
US Patent 7226775-Jun2007 "there remains a pressing need for removing endotoxin from pharmaceuticals. In particular, vaccines"
Is there poison in vaccines? Yes, the antigen mixture and preservatives
Genetically engineered bacteria/yeast make antigens. Cell walls are destroyed to extract them. "Purified" antigens have endotoxins, DNA fragments, cell debris
In a pill the poisons caused immune disorders. Injected toxins are more potent. Autoimmune disorders and Autism are possible
CHEMRISK - a research company hired by the Corn Refiners Association has recently taken down it's YouTube channel.
The removal was in response to negative public perception resulting from the discovery of dangerous levels of MERCURY in HIGH-FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP. Apparently it has become a liability to defend the sweetener.
See one of the last remaining ChemRisk videos at CornRefinersAssoc on YouTube.
For those looking into ways to to detox with Zeolite. its one of the most powerful remedies for removing chemicals such as mercury, flouride from the body which can help heighten the state of the immune system.
This site has the Zeolite is superb quality. Type in the web address listed, and take away spaces.
I've noticed an appalling lack of science in the medical community. Society reveres MDs as genius gods, but most are highly trained technicians following linear sets of rules. They don't do a lot of creative problem solving. They stick to the AMA endorsed guidelines and follow the procedures that are approved by insurance companies. These are the dogmatic ideological descendants of the medieval barbers who used leaches for bloodletting.
My asperger has improved dramatically by doing chelation with DMSA. Also my period has come back. I almost have to cry because I'm so thankful and at the same time so sad because of what is happening. Thanks to Doctors like Boyd Haley.
Yes the industrial poisoning at Minimata and Hudson Bay Canada are gross examples mercury toxicity.
Still, these are incident specific examples involving industry. There is no risk from consuming fish otherwise. The 2 sources of mercury toxicity are tooth fillings and vaccinations.
I have taken these vaccines and i have amalgam fillings. But many times worse I have given both to my children. PLEASE HELP> WHAT DO I DO TO GET RID OF MERCURY??
and guess what? I have neurological asperger-dementia-autistic-like disease from mercury vapour exposure from inappropriate removal of fillings AFTER a hair test indicated that i have a mercury problem and BEFORE that i was almost fully healthy (esp. relatively to what is going on in me now).
I had 4 fillings removed 2 months ago because of how i was feeling as i am quite a sensitive person, it was affecting me alot.
I feel so much beter for it, a changed man!
When some people say "ah they dont bother me there fine" they may not be as sensitive but i'm quite sure over time it will show symtoms.. Have them removed but detox also! x
My question is why has a parent not killed these evil fucks at the CDC and Big Pharma. Whom are destroying the lives of children, not to mention the family itself. I can think of few crimes that warrant death, but this is surly at the top of the list.
The comments posted below by batigol47 are not true. That is another myth, that Thimerosal has been removed from vaccines. No.
Thimerosal has NOT been removed from all vaccines. It is still present in many flu and tetanus shots.
Another myth is that one can get mercury poisoning from eating fish. This is not true. The focus on mercury poisoning as a result of eating fish takes the focus off of mercury amalgam fillings and Thimerosal containing vaccines. Focus on fillings and vaccines.
Brown seaweed is the only product with every alginate in. Laminaria japonica is its name, it works on both autism and gulf war syndrome. Dr boyd haley is a brave man, he has told the truth now act and remove that mercury. Only laminaria japonica works. [brown seaweed.]
Thank you, Dr. Haley. You will take a special seat in heaven one day, for trying to do and say what is right for the sake of humanity. I just urge everyone to check out ALL the videos on this subject, and use your own good judgement. I won't get into specifics because there are idiots floating around who want to convince me that I am a fool for believing you, and think they know better. No way.
I've gone to about three different dentists in Vancouver Canada in the last 2 years,who told me that amalgam "mercury fillings" were perfectly safe and that the controversy over it was based on myth and/or bad science! Regretfully I actually let one of these dentists "bully" me into getting another ugly mercury filling!!!
oly, the only thing you could have done that would have been worse was let him remove an almalgam! Only a dentist that is very very carerful should remove them... and only one every 6 months or so... and only while you are in full detox treatment.
i had two removed and felt like shit for 2 months,, and I used a dam and oxygen and suction,, this is no joke, I have 3 left and the 2 big ones on the bottom,, I am just having the whole fucking tooth ripprd out! fuck it, I will replace one more and that's it, just to make it even, and root canals are unhealthy as well
I agree with everything said about the mercury/vaccination/autism link with the exception of Dr. Haley's comment about us "evolving". Scientific evidence clearly points to the Creation of all living things by an Intelligent Designer... God. :-) That issue aside - Good Report FAIR... Thank you for posting it on You Tube!
He did not specify whether or nothe was talking about micro or macro evolution. It is entirely consistent with the belief of creation to say that we have evolved small changes, such as those mentioned by Dr. Haley. Evolving from primates is very different.
Glutathione helps the body expel mercury. Mercury causes the symptoms of autism. Removing the mercury is the first step in recovering from the damage caused by mercury poisoning. Additional treatments can improve the rate and extent to which a person heals.
There has been no drop in the rate of Autism despite the removal of thimerosol from vaccines. This theory simply doesn't hold water, and merely distracts from finding the real reasons for autism.
they only completely removed it around 2003, and the reason for autism is easy to see, pollution, pollution that affects pregnant women and then continues after the baby is born,vaccines are a direct vehicle for poison, and dozens of other sources as well, that is the "inconvenient truth"
This is part of a plan for feminisation of the world.Those boys who are femenin pass the test of the niddle , perfect to fall into the gay indoctrination or to have only girls when they marry.
Don't forget about the Flouride in it and what that does to a person too. The reason for putting in prison water supplies during WWII wasn't to prevent cavities then, which it never did. It was to make the prisoners "docile and stupid", and anyone who looks at the literature will find it lowers a persons IQ score an average of 20 points. That is a lot of IQ points. I couldn't spare that many - could you?
Thank you very much for sharing this invaluable information. I am an ABA therapist working with children with Autism and strongly believe that Autism is if not caused certainly brought on by or worsened by environmental factors like vaccines. I will be sharing these videos with the parents of the children I work with.
Thanks for posting these on youtube! Parents with "autistic" children need to know what really happened to their kids. Dr. Haley is right, it is criminal!
This has been flagged as spam show
article.php?id=CNG.1b07d1be69ebdf895fab113ba26ecde7.321&show_article=1
promiseIsaih60 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
have you guys heard about the brand-new wow hacks on wowcheatsYnet (replace Y with . ) ? i find it difficult to believe they are giving them away totally free. in most cases that sort of information is only on the super secret underground sites.
hirokobroom989824 1 year ago
u half wits are missing the point, its not that the vaccines are bad, its what they put in the vaccines, no one is disputing that vaccines can save lives and do eradicate terrible illnesses , its what they are putting in the damn vaccines. no one says food is bad for you, yet there are so many chemicals and shit in it that make pple obese, its like u morons take the argument flip it and twist it to make pple who question the norm sound nuts , maybe u should start questioning shit BAH BAH SHEEEP
83Pindi 1 year ago
I'd like to see independent evidence that any one vaccine is safe. Why do we even need vaccines? Why not educate people on developing a healthy immune system and educating on correct sanitation? Why do egunecists and other globalists encourage vaccinations? In their own words and docs they stated it was to sterilize (reduce population). I find it sad that people think vaccines are good. They don't produce a natural immune response. Just get healthy and most of your worries are gone. Simple.
cabgt 1 year ago
Sorry transboy. You obviously don't research anything before you type.
Most countries of the world are now at negative population growth. This has just been published, but I guess you didn't know that.
Mercury is the sterilization-drug of choice used by Rockefeller/Kissinger to kill the human population. This IS the new holocaust.
People had better wake up...
urlbam - com/ha/M001R
Sorry transboy :(
mmem701 2 years ago
*Studies which have been done are not designed to eliminate the examiners bias. Authorities who compile and report disease statistics work closely with and have a vested interest in companies which produce the vaccines. In other industries, this kind of bias is not tolerated. Injuries and deaths in these studies are attributed to anything but vaccination to skew the results and make it appear that vaccines have some merit.
-Dr Sherri Tenpenny
cabgt 2 years ago
lol...
sherry tenpenny is an idiot. she has ZERO qualification in any science. She is not qualified to talk about anything related to health. she is a known quack:
Quackwatch org
i am tired of your ignorance. if you prefer to be gulible enough to buy crap, so do it. when you get some education inside that little head you'll see how much of a fool you are.
you idiots are all the same: ignorance and total dumb. you can't grasp science: therefore you kill people.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Again, look at the lack of credibility the pharma and government has. Time and time again. Funny you cannot deny this...it's in the public record. But you choose to ignore what you don't want to believe. Again, most of the UN panel aren't scientists, many who are/and aren't disagree with the panels findings and have withdrawn, the panel were given the executive summary prior to any research and the terms of reference conveniently fail to question the sun as a probable cause. It's political!
cabgt 2 years ago
Go look up what the scientific method is!!!!!
You replicate the method, you get same results, peer-review, if it is valid and pass scrutiny, there evidence of something. You can't fake that.
I think your anti.science claims pittyfull. Instead of worrying about the climate change, you deny it. you are dumb.
transtlantic 2 years ago
You're denying that statistics and data cannot be manipulated to show a desired outcome. That is naive. How many times have i read about control groups been manipulated to suit an outcome, researches being pressured to show a certain outcome (i.e. executive summary prepared before any studies), and serious key facts left out of reports/research terms of reference. This is all matter of fact. You deny this. Naive. Keep drinking your healthy fluoride water and prozac tabs. Corruption doesnt exist
cabgt 2 years ago
I am denying nothing you are. PLease tell...how can the data of more than 20 different countries, of papers made by 20 different teams, with thousands of different people. Done randomly and controlled, put to scrutiny and verified by peers... survive if it was manipulated? Wakefield tried that and look how easy it was to expose him as a fraud.
You the naive bugger with no idea about the scientific method.
So now its fluoride? lol...can you prove it does bad? no
corruption does exist btw.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Why is fluoride not recommended for consumtion to little kids or baby's? I mean in toothpaste. Why shouldn't a child swallow the toothpaste? Dentists tell you it is only for topical use. Fluoride has never been found to adversely effect the brain and body? Why did the Russian's use flouride in the gulag camps drinking water? Again, most of the research is flawed. Sad but true that we cannot trust it. No credibility.
cabgt 2 years ago
there was never such thing recommended. What is not recomended is to give water with higher concentrations that 1,2mg/L of fluoride until age 6.
In the toothpaste is not recommended that they swallow it. But even then... there is no such evidence of harm. It's a precaution. There is no epidemic of Dental fluorosis in ages lower than 6.
Dentists say there is a higher benefit if in topical use.
again: toxicity of any chemical: IS DOSE RELATED!!!
transtlantic 2 years ago
Once again:
you fail to provide which research is flawed. You just making empty claims with nothing to back you up. your ignorance is astonishing.
The scientific consensus of the 60s still stands. If we keep with the global warming the consequence will be a global cooling with an iceage following. Science is not wrong about that. hence the warnings.
What engineers are you talking about? none of ofc.
it's your conspiracy crap talking
transtlantic 2 years ago
I'm assuming you're NOT religious, because there is no proof or data that Jesus or anyone existed. The bible and other religions are based on frauds. It's a conspiracy and most of the world's people have fallen for it...including scientists. Double standards, lol
cabgt 2 years ago
There is actually evidence that Jesus existed. Documents proving his arrest and his burial and many other references to that man.
religion has nothing to do with science, you ignorant person.
so you have no way to relate the two. Only if you are dumb.
transtlantic 2 years ago
The two are related...shows your double standards. You believe the stories of bible and religion, yet there is NO evidence. And at the very least, peer reviewed evidence. lol
cabgt 2 years ago
i believe in what? lol...i am an atheist you, you idiot.
I know religion is a fantasy.
Science has nothing to do with religion you ignorant moron.
transtlantic 2 years ago
There is just one of many examples of the public believing 911 is a coverup. look at how popular the consipracy dvd and youtube movies are, even though they are being censored! LOL.
Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story
Only 16% now believe official fable according to New York Times/CBS News poll
cabgt 2 years ago
lol...a new york times poll is not scientific, its anedoctal.
Any poll without the number of people in the poll has ZERO value.
keep trying quack, you are a total lay man, i pitty your ignorance.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Scientific Poll was the headline. No truth to the poll...you're refuting it, that it was never taken? It's a conspiracy? lol. You science crowd are so narrow minded. Let me remind you that the scientific consensus in 60's was global cooling and the coming iceage.....lol. Science is never wrong is it. How about the hundreds of engineers around the world who petitioned for answers to the collapse of Word Trade Centre 7 and the other two towers? They think it's suss. Conspiracy theorists hey...
cabgt 2 years ago
*There are no control group studies. Authorities consider that "to not vaccinate" is unethical and have refused to study unvaccinated volunteers. If control studies were done according ' to honest science, vaccination would be outlawed.
cabgt 2 years ago
Like i said earlier, big pharma and govt have lost alot of credibility over the years due to their lies, coverups, motives...they are those who stand to gain and with much more to lose. I have witnessed this on a personal level in my industry.
cabgt 2 years ago
bah...and then you posted another fine example of a anti-science moron being born in your person...
conspiracy theory is your path.
I await your 9/11 nonsense in a few weeks. or maybe aids denialism? who knows? the moment a dumb person like you stops wanting to learn and just deny reality, anything is possible.
cya idiot
transtlantic 2 years ago
I am now convinced you're brainwashed by modern medicine and mainstream media propoganda. The fact you deny 911 inside job is laughable. I would eat you alive in that debate. The 911 Commission report was fraudulent...another example why most people don't trust government, pharma etc. The mass populations are waking up to the lies. Just the same with climate change. Fraudulent reports again, terms of reference fail to investigate many natural causes. Lies = no credibility = public distrust
cabgt 2 years ago
well, if "brainwashed" by modern medicine....that can only mean i am "brainwashed" by the most factual and present information.
"mainstream media"? lol... i barely watch tv.
AH, afterall there was a 911 crazy icke conspiracy idiot inside of you.
lol, "fraudelent"...lol..yeah, they didn't put enough pictures for illiterates like you could grasp the text meaning.
climate change? lol... just name one scientist that says there is not climate change.
transtlantic 2 years ago
For the record; you're in the minority if you don't believe 911 was an inside job. Yes, your subconscious is brainwashed from mainstream media. You don't have to watch tv 5 hours a day to be. It's all around you. Again, time and time again throughout history - including science - people like you called others with different views conspiracy theorists, and time and time again people like you have been proven wrong. Again, you seem to have no rebutle for my credibility argument. lol (sheep)
cabgt 2 years ago
"in a minority"? lol..based upon what? the little voices in your head?
NO, people like you call man of science crazy and used to burn them. and time and time again LAY people like you are the ones who kill, destroy and keep being losers who contribute ZERO to society.
what argument do you have? zero, you failed to support any of your claims. And I DID support mine.
cya, sheep, keep buying the conspiracy labeled products.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Have you read the official 911 report? I think not, because you would've known there are huge holes in it! You think everything is a coincidence....by your standard no-one would ever be charged with a crime! Again, i know first hand and from previous judgements, admissions, whistle-blowers, declassfied documents etc that pharma, governments have lied to the public and in their reports, their statistics, data etc. I gave you clear cut examples of profit & politics trying to influence outcomes.
cabgt 2 years ago
the entire hundreds of page report? no. I am also not a civil engeneer. Are you? can you understand all those graphs of the physics of the accident? well, i can, not fully ofc. But i understand quite a lot of math and have some engeneer firends.
I see very small holes in the report.
Everything IS a coincidence, or better put: nothing is. But i call it a random universe for a reason.
By my standards people are charged when they are guilty, not when they can't be proved guilty.
transtlantic 2 years ago
All that you claim is nothing but ad hominem. You must adress the subject at hand. and don't let previous events to manipulate the way you produce a conclusion. Or by your standards i should call you a killer, a rapist or a thief. Because most of the australians are descendents of such type of individuals.
You failed to provide me any example related to vaccinesor the video at hand Mainly by two reasons you are already wrong:
1) mercury is not in the vaccines
2) Hg toxicity doesn't cause autism
transtlantic 2 years ago
I now can really see you for what you are, courtesy of your poor behaviour and insults. What does that say about the person you are?? People who love others and love themselves don't resort to your low standard. Immature.
cabgt 2 years ago
Immature? lol... said the man shouting conspiracy fantasy to me. AHAHAH
get real. You have ZERO evidence against immunizations. While i provided you with plenty in favour of vaccines and their safety.
you want to deny it? you want to stay ignorant? fine. when morons like you reach court you lose due to your ignorance. you just to dumb to figure science, hence you don't even try to understand.
get real, my insults is me getting bored by another conspiracy wacko
transtlantic 2 years ago
What does your behaviour and language on here say about you?
cabgt 2 years ago
that ignorant idiots that are Crazy Icke's annoy me.
try shut up and learn about proper science. you haven't reffuted any of the papers i presented. And all you were able to show was anedoctal claims.
get lost
transtlantic 2 years ago
I provided you with websites to resources and studies. You ridicule people for exercising their right to freedom and to question things. I remind you, conspiracy theorists (people who question things) have exposed many things and have been proven to be right throughout history. You don't seem a happy person...from your behaviour i don't think you like yourself.
cabgt 2 years ago
you provided me ZERO. you just want that written at the top of the page. Fact is: you are lying. you failed to present one signle study.
i ridicule your ignorance and inability to support your claims.
conspiracy theorists: ignorants who question things, when answered: the delusion remains. It's pure paranoia.
just tell me one thing in the last 100 years that a conspiracy theorist has exposed? nothing? ofc nothing!
from your behaviour i know you probably believe in ghosts and creationism
transtlantic 2 years ago
6 of the 10 commissioners in the 911 report have publicly spoken out against it stating that it is flawed, that the official govt story is different to the facts. This is on record. There are hundreds of architects and engineers who also have publicly stated the same position. But these statements mean little to you because you don't want to believe it because it may distort your perfect view of the world. You live in a bubble. lol. I gave you the websites with links to the resources - READ THEM
cabgt 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well... all a lot of incredible claims and not even one single reference to support your claims about 911. I will claim this: you are a liar. All the comissioners support the reports given. There are hundreds of architects and engineers who publicly stated that they agree with the reports. it's not a question of "belief", its a matter of FACT. you failed to present any reference for your claims.
try give me proper websites. anedoctal claims are useless.
transtlantic 2 years ago
The evidence is all over the net. It's all there at your fingertips should you wish to see it. The fact you try and dodge my claims by telling me to supply references when it is at your fingertips - clearly shows your reluctance to challenge your belief system. Again, google 911 Commissioner Max Cleland resigns over 911 coverup, in which a total of 6 out of 10 commission members stated it was a coverup. And answer all the simple questions the government won't answer. What are they hiding? Hmmm
cabgt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if the information is at "my fingertips" why is it so hard to be presented by you?
"belief systems"? lol..i am a close to a materialist you idiot.
I won't google whatever useless crap you have to present. you can't provide any reference. it's just ear say with you.
you are a disgrace to the day that just passed
transtlantic 2 years ago
Too many people bury their head in the sand and fail to read the CFR, UN, Government documents and those of other world leaders/persons of infuence in government, medicine and business as they relate to their sick views on medicine, eugenics etc. I'm not the one making it up - read their own documents. Read John Holdrens (Obama science czar) "Ecoscience" book or Kissingers "UN State Memo 200." Read Rothchild's and Rockefellers memos (the people who founded the institution of modern medicine)...
cabgt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
eugenics? AHAHAHA just tell... if there is an "eugenics secret movement"...why do people live longer, young deaths have decreased and therefore we are more and more people each year? your eugenics movement is doing a very poor poor job...
you idiot. Medicine is the biggest anti-eugenics thing that there can be. Vaccines oppose such possibilities of eugenics.
i read part of all those things. you ignoranct morons just put everything out of context. you a bunch of dumb people afraid of the sky
transtlantic 2 years ago
Actually, in the Western world people aren't neccesarily living longer. Depends on the data you're using and whether you're taking into account the infant mortality rates. Again, people need to be wary of the terms of reference. Are you denying Holdren's book is related to eugenics?? Wow. Read these peoples own documents - i'm not making it up - they're the ones stating these sick things. Not my words but theirs. You haven't even read any of these documents because it is an inconvenient truth!
cabgt 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they aren't living longer?
1800 US: 35 years life expectancy
2005 US: 77 yars life expectancy
do you realize that are still places in the world with life expectancy lower than 40?
"depends on the data" i am using? what? the official data? hehe...
i am presenting facts. "books" are not peer-reviewed references to studies.
you are making everything up and you keep being unable to provide anything.
I'll tell you what is truth: Vaccines are safe and effective. end of
transtlantic 2 years ago
The UN has meddled with life expactancy data and infant mortality rates for years. I am referring to the last 50 years in western countries. Not 200 years. Lastly, "official" data is not always credible as the system, the beaurocrats, govt, pharma, bio med industry has lost most of it's credibility. I don't need data to tell me that. People aren't stupid, hence why there is a growing number of people against vaccines. Thousand of health professionals believe latest swine flu vaccine is unsafe
cabgt 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"meddled"? lololol
not credible? says who? the conspiracy idiot? ahahahaha
don't be a joke, you just need to go to a hospital and ask for the written records. Or the church even. You telling me that you don't need "data", is proof that you are a stupid person. end of
"thousand"? AHAHAHAHAH, really? based on? hehe...
transtlantic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@transHugo the uneducated buffoon from the brazilian slum.
You are so ashamed of the so called theory of evolution that you believe in that you are scared to name it.
You know it is bullshit.
hahahahahahahaha
Do you believe in the same theory of evolution as Coyne?
Chirp Chirp.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
WildCatsKitten1 2 weeks ago
this video is outdated
vaccines are not the cause of autism
transtlantic 2 years ago
Comment removed
tondeee 2 years ago
Transtlantic, don't make empty claims, offer evidence.
tondeee 2 years ago
lol, more evidence?
US special court 12 feb 2009
transtlantic 2 years ago
Yeah, because the courts have integrity. Hmm, George Bush really one the 2000 election!! To believe the courts and judges are acting in the publics best interests is baloney. Corruption is all well and good in modern USA.
cabgt 2 years ago
well, ad hominem and strawman are pittyfull arguments. do you have any evidence against the court decision?
please do say where the court was wrong.
transtlantic 2 years ago
do your due dilligence and research for yourself. It's common knowledge courts have been corrupted time and time again.
cabgt 2 years ago
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):36-42. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
this paper explains very well why immunizations have nothing to do with PDD, why immunizations have absolutly no conection to autism.
do you see any mistakes in the paper?
strawman and ad hominem arguments like yours are pittyfull. you clearly don't even understand what is autism or why do we need vaccines.
transtlantic 2 years ago
What ended Polio, TB etc? Vaccines or better hydeine, sanitation, health education, practices etc? Why has time and time again vaccinated populations had a higher incidence of disease for which they were vaccinated than those who were not vaccinated? Has anyone ever died from vaccines related complications? Have big pharma and governments always been honest with the public? Are they free of corruption? Who funds most research and journals? Who do doctors really work for - drug co or patients?
cabgt 2 years ago
well, that is an outright lie. In fact. vaccinated populations have a lower incidence of disease for which they were vaccinated. just compare vaccination rates in diferent countries vs disease vaccines prevent against.
no one has ever died due to a vaccine in the last 30 years. But unvaccinated people have died by the thousands of polio, TB, whooping cough,....
corruption or whatever argument you choose that involves ad hominem, are not proof against vaccines.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Really? No one has ever died due to a vaccine related complication, wow! I wonder why the swine flu vaccine was pulled off the market in the 70's then...apparently people were dying after taking the shot. And what role does santitation, hygeine, general health play in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations data? Why does the data show that whooping cough, polio, tb...rates were approx 90% down when vaccines were introduced? Can we really credit vaccines with this decline in these diseases?
cabgt 2 years ago
I asked you to name one death in the last 30 years due to a vaccine. We are in 2009, this goes until 1979. Before that the tech for vaccines was different. And even then more people died with no vaccines than if they had vaccines.
the swine flu vaccine of the time was pulled due to two correlational episodes with no proven casuality. even then more than 40 million people were vaccinated in the US. btw... it was one death that was tied to the vaccine. with no proof of causality.
transtlantic 2 years ago
bu then the epidemic was over and it was deemed that the vaccine progrma for that disease could stop.
wanna know how much vaccination vs unvaccinated are when put to the test? ok, number deaths to polio in the US and then compare it to India, check vaccination rates.
I dare you to present that data you claim. Because it is a lie promoted by anti-vaxers crap websites. when put to scrutiny they are all proven lies.
We can credit vaccines to increase in life expectancy and low young death rates.
transtlantic 2 years ago
medical journals are like any other magazine, except that the best ones don't have any publicity related to possible conflicts of interest.
most research is paid by pharma in terms of drugs. But a lot more is not paid by pharma. namely biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, microbiology, a lot of that is not pharma giving the money. they don't want it to. because that exposes their flaws.
If i treat 1, 10 or 1000000 patients i'll receive the same.
transtlantic 2 years ago
So who funds these people? Who are their clients? These researches, did any ever work in big pharma. Are these government run programs? It is quite naive to think that there is no influence. History shows this whether it be in big pharma or government. Both lack credibility, hence why the people are fedup with congress and big companies i.e. banks, big phamra, insurance...oh yeah, and it helps that i know people in the or who had worked in the industry.
cabgt 2 years ago
The NIH funds researchers using taxpayers money. The "clients" being the general public or specific groups. Fact is most of researchers don't work for pharma. And that is not a good argument against the ones who do work for pharam.
if you accuse "lack of credibility", who has credibility to you? do you need it that you give the money directly and the research is done in the middle of the desert? LOL :P
transtlantic 2 years ago
ok ok, big pharma, governments have never lied to the public or anyone about serious issues. Never cooked stats or studies to suit what would benefit them. You know you maybe right. No corruption exists in society and never has because "I, myself" cannot prove it. Everything is a coincidence and all the people (the general public and healthcare professionals, MD's, doctors, whistleblower etc) claiming that vaccines can be harmful are conspiracy theorists.
cabgt 2 years ago
i never said we were never lied to. What i do mean is why should that be an argument against future claims? you must look into each claim independently. Using past events to try support another unrelated one is a logical falacy.
The scientific method puts all studies and stats to scrutiny. that avoids scientific fraud. It may happen, but is difficult to.
I dare you to present one MD that has provided evidence against vaccines. just one.
transtlantic 2 years ago
You seem to know more than me, what has Dr Russell Blaylock MD provided? He would appear (from his resume) to be someone with a high level of expertise in neurological science...i think Dr Andrew Moulden is another person. Then again, i haven't been researching this topic for long.
cabgt 2 years ago
Dr Russel Blaylock is a neurosurgeon. Not neurologist., I say this because he has the entire community of neurology association against his claims.
He done experiences where he used enormsly higher concentrations of thiomersal compared to the ones used in the past (thiomersal was stopped more than 13 years ago). his studies prove toxicity is dose related and that in fact thiomersal was never given in such toxic doses. he uses his study to promote anti-vax nevertheless.
transtlantic 2 years ago
In a court of law, the judge will look at the accused history/character reference, the evidence at hand (circumstantial etc or not), possible motives, what they had to gain. Put it into the context of big pharma and you can see why the public are suss. That's my angle. But hey, everything in life may just be a coincidence...?
cabgt 2 years ago
well, i see that you are going the anti-vax path.
i can only make one last appeal for you to at least try to understand how the immune system works. When that is explained in court, pretty much lay people in the room understand why there is no link between vax and autism.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Dr Andrew Moulden - no research, lot of talk, total quack.
he has a reference at Quackwatch org
you should read always ask to verify where are they getting the support for their claims and then reading it yourself.
i sent to your inbox a ton of evidence against the anti.vax claims. try at least read some. or why not go here?
sciencebasedmedicine org
transtlantic 2 years ago
ur an idiot
83Pindi 1 year ago
What causes autism and why is it on the increase and why is it that coincidentally, neurological damage occurs within days of vaccinations? Any reasonable person would question the circumstantial evidence. But please enlighten me or point me in the right direction of the truth and i will happily investigate it. P.S. i used to be pro vaccine until i started researching it after my cousin developed autism within hours of vaccination. I'm open minded.
cabgt 2 years ago
what neurological damage?
you clearly don't know what autism is. Autism has only one area of diagnose criteria: psychology. Autism is diagnose with psychological criteria: ONLY. At the moment. it takes months to evaluate a child in order to provide a diagnose.
so please tell how can that be done in "days of vaccinations"? it can't. Autism appears at the ages where vaccines are given. Some parents decided to blame vaccines, because they are ignorant.
transtlantic 2 years ago
It isn't neurological damage when your child all of a sudden cannot speak, communicate, articulate (basically acts drunk)? What is it then, i'm curious? I mean the medical world puts so many labels on things it's hard to keep up.
cabgt 2 years ago
it might be neurological damage. But then that has nothing to do with autism if it happens that sudden.
and when was that "sudden". I've heard anti-vaxxers saying that "sudden" happening more than 3 to 6 months after vaccines. isn't that amazing? hehe
transtlantic 2 years ago
Well then my claim is my cousin has neurological damage, which is what i believe i did imply. Anyway, there is a good link. Or am i pushing coincidence like all the other parents?
cabgt 2 years ago
I don't know how long it took between the vaccine and the so claimed "damage". Past family history, how was pregnancy... so on.
Your claim is only anedoctal in this debate. try present evidence.
transtlantic 2 years ago
Wouldn't any reasonable person explore the relationship between a vaccine then their child having a melt down hours later? From now on i'm not going to refer to autism but rather neurological damage - it seems to be what most anti vax doctors etc are saying. Autism and definitions, labelling makes things confusing.
cabgt 2 years ago
actually labelling provides the explanation needed. It's because people don't label that they mess up all the meanings of the words and concepts.
a mother telling me that her child has autism but not PDD? omg... that is total misconception and ignorance.
Don't the family MD explain things to you?
transtlantic 2 years ago
Labelling seems like it gives pro vax people a way to wriggle out of sticky situations. Like the CDC and the recent court ruling (Hannah Poling). I'm referring to things as neuro damage.
cabgt 2 years ago
Hannah Poling has nothing to do with any of this.
She had a previous genetic condition. The common flu could have triggered her disease in her first few days of life.
Plus the court ruling was based upon a correlational factor, not due to casuality,
People with autism don't have the Poling condition. They may test all they like. Poling's disease is so rare that all cases are registred and extensively studied.
Labelling is necessary. You don't call the sun just a star.
transtlantic 2 years ago
the sun is a star..well that is what i was taught, maybe my teacher is a conspiracy theorist?! In regards to Poling, the vaccine played a major role did it not? And i'm not directly talking about Autism here. There was an adverse reaction due to taking the vaccine and a pre-existing condition. Correct? I was also curious into what long term studies go into the safety and efficacy of vaccines?
cabgt 2 years ago
you didn't get it. Forget it, the idea is lost in the translation to english.
The vaccine played a role? how do we know? there is only a correlational link, not casual. The judge didn't even listen to all expert witness.
To understand why Hannah Poling has nothing to do with vaccines you should first learn what is the immune system. Go read about it. If you try go over the basics you'll make all the wrong assumptions that any other anti-vax loser is making.
stop, go read science, then think
transtlantic 2 years ago
Ok, i'll read it. I want to believe vaccines are safe. I guess it's the millions of people against them (for whatever reason), coupled with previous lies and deceptions that make me think twice about them. Just too many coincidences re deaths in vaccine trials, neurological disorders etc. And science has been wrong in the past time and time again. Also the lack of long term studies into vaccines. Furthemore, why are these makers free from liability? All reasonable questions, concerns.
cabgt 2 years ago
i already asked for you to name one death due to vaccines in the last 30 years. There is none cabgt.... but you do have thousands of deaths in unvaccinated people due to polio, TB,....
Even if an hypothesis was wrong in the past it doesn't mean you'll find answers by rejecting science.
long term studies? vaccines have been used for more than 100 years...
transtlantic 2 years ago
Sorry, i was relating this to the tobacco industry science claims in the past. Scientists were saying smoking could be beneficial, like today scientists saying mobile phones are safe and scientists who said the world was flat. That's what i mean't about science doing backflips and cooking stats/data etc.
cabgt 2 years ago
That example was exactly why there is more scrutiny today.
In the past it was empty claims made by the tobacco industry. They had no support for their claims. And scientists were the ones who spent decades doing studies and providing evidence that it was harmfull. It took thousand of people with problems to stop and listen to science.
you have a total misconception about science... try go look up what the scientific method is.
transtlantic 2 years ago
I thought there were scientists supporting the tobacco industry i.e. tobacco funded lots of the research, much like how pharma funds lots of research or uses known pro pharma research/scientists to head studies? Science has been wrong in the past is my point. Constant backflips. One year research says 'x' is bad for you the next year research says 'x' is good for you. The public doesn't trust anyone anymore. I'm just asking questions. Wouldn't you agree thats a good thing? (im being nice btw)
cabgt 2 years ago
scientists can support whatever. If they don't back up their claims their opinion values close to nothing. If their research can't pass peer-review they are exposed. What happened in the past is much much harder now.
your questions when made with no background understanding of basic sciences won't let you understand the subject before after the question is answered.
do as i told you: go read what is autism, what is vaccines, why do we need them.
try this:
sciencebasedmedicine org
transtlantic 2 years ago
So why is mercury a known toxin to man if it has no effect on the human body? That is your position is it not? Why do so many doctors advise pregnant women not to eat fish, during prenancy. They state it is due to the mercury. Again, the medical industry is making it hard for themselves. Poor credibility. I don't have a science background, rather a business and history major. History one helps. My mother is a Bio-Chemist at a well-known university. My friend worked in research in big pharma.
cabgt 2 years ago
cabgt... i am tired of this back and forth. I am tired of the amount of ignorance that people like you have.
TOXICITY IS DOSE RELATED. any chemical can be a toxin. Even molecular oxygen.
Fish contains inorganic mercury. and may have very large quantities of mercury forms.
the pharma is telling you using simple chemistry that: THIOMERSAL IS NOT MERCURY. get that in your little head. why don't you have problem with sulphur?
go tell your mother that you are dumb
transtlantic 2 years ago
The state pays a part of the vaccines and is the main promotor of immunizations. Pharma loses money with vaccines, so has no interest in making vaccines.
The state assumes the responsability for any damage that might be associated with vaccines. so that pharma doesn't go down with any problem due to vaccines.
It is a kind of protection, but because we are talking about a serious health subject, we can't allow a manufacter to go down. we need them to produce vaccines.
transtlantic 2 years ago
I'll read those docs you sent me, but i have a flat-out work schedule (believe it or not, i work in the pharma industry), but in the meantime can you recommend any good videos on youtube that support vaccines? Like i said, i'd rather believe they are safe because 1) heaps of people have been vaccinated and i have to make that choice for my kids one day and 2) i work in the industry. Thanks.
cabgt 2 years ago
1) including one of my videos there are tons of videos in the youtube of people getting vaccinated.
2) so you should have no problem to ask a qualified person in the company to explain you directly the need for vaccines
transtlantic 2 years ago
1) Is an over simplification, apparently it is the cummulative effect of vaccinations that is most dangerous (build up of known toxins) & blood clotting. 2) I don't trust my company because of whistleblowers who had worked in my company in research/development/efficacy area's. Hence, why i'm online trying to get some answers. Can't find consensus. Frustrating, particularly because the science and data can be easily manipulated...unless you read all the studies word for word you cant trust them
cabgt 2 years ago
1) there is no cummulative effects - again, go READ what is a vaccine and how it works.
2) you can't find consensu? lol... just name one peer-reviewed journal providing evidence against vaccines. this should be interesting....
mainly because you don't read the studies. do you have any background in science?
transtlantic 2 years ago
the "evidence" is just correlational, and it's very poor. There is in fact no casuality.
so, your cousin could never ever developed autism within hours of vaccination. you are lying to people here.
transtlantic 2 years ago
If you want to be technical it is both circumstantial and correlational when you take into account other people's accounts of the same nature. Both can be submitted in court and taken seriously. I'm lying, like the thousands of other people who claim the same situation? So what caused this apparent damage to my cousin and the thousands of other kids? Are all these people and other doctors, scientists just conspiracy theorists? Because they question things? More questions then answers is the case
cabgt 2 years ago
"people's accounts" alone are what is called: "anedoctal claims": they value ZERO has evidence.
i found out that most parents don't even know what autism is. I also found out most parents can't tell the difference between autism and PDD-NOS. so in the middle of "thousands" we actually have diverse pathologies claimed to be caused by vaccines.
And what doctors are you talking about? name one that has presented any evidence against vaccines. please present a paper that was peer-reviewed.
transtlantic 2 years ago
No, parents are getting ALL the answers. WHat some don't get it, is that they are denying the answers!
What those some are not wanting to do: learn the science behind vaccines and autism and realize how they have absolutly no link.
transtlantic 2 years ago
US Patent 7226775-Jun2007 "there remains a pressing need for removing endotoxin from pharmaceuticals. In particular, vaccines"
Is there poison in vaccines? Yes, the antigen mixture and preservatives
Genetically engineered bacteria/yeast make antigens. Cell walls are destroyed to extract them. "Purified" antigens have endotoxins, DNA fragments, cell debris
In a pill the poisons caused immune disorders. Injected toxins are more potent. Autoimmune disorders and Autism are possible
SayNoToGMO 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1989 A pill sold OTC, L-tryptophan, poisoned thousands in Canada & USA. Thousands died or were permanently injured
Genetically engineered bacteria make tryptophan then are crushed. We extract tryptophan from the toxic soup. It's contaminated with endotoxins
The contaminated tryptophan caused Eosinophilia Myalgia an autoimmune disorder, no cure
Antigens in vaccines are made the same way and similar toxins, with mercury/aluminum, could cause autoimmune disorders and/or autism
SayNoToGMO 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The rats are jumping ship.
CHEMRISK - a research company hired by the Corn Refiners Association has recently taken down it's YouTube channel.
The removal was in response to negative public perception resulting from the discovery of dangerous levels of MERCURY in HIGH-FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP. Apparently it has become a liability to defend the sweetener.
See one of the last remaining ChemRisk videos at CornRefinersAssoc on YouTube.
BeaucoupRed 2 years ago
Algin, Brown seaweed and lots and lots of fruit will remove most mercury.
warriorprince1010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For those looking into ways to to detox with Zeolite. its one of the most powerful remedies for removing chemicals such as mercury, flouride from the body which can help heighten the state of the immune system.
This site has the Zeolite is superb quality. Type in the web address listed, and take away spaces.
noblelifeelements . com /superman
Magicmanny 2 years ago
Dr. Haley makes a lot of sense.
I've noticed an appalling lack of science in the medical community. Society reveres MDs as genius gods, but most are highly trained technicians following linear sets of rules. They don't do a lot of creative problem solving. They stick to the AMA endorsed guidelines and follow the procedures that are approved by insurance companies. These are the dogmatic ideological descendants of the medieval barbers who used leaches for bloodletting.
Liberty4Ever 3 years ago 6
look to the nonsense: "lack of science in the medical community"?!?! can you give the day when a new medical discovery was not made?!?!?!
leaches are still used btw
transtlantic 2 years ago
My asperger has improved dramatically by doing chelation with DMSA. Also my period has come back. I almost have to cry because I'm so thankful and at the same time so sad because of what is happening. Thanks to Doctors like Boyd Haley.
Grenbarme 3 years ago 4
I apologise.
Yes the industrial poisoning at Minimata and Hudson Bay Canada are gross examples mercury toxicity.
Still, these are incident specific examples involving industry. There is no risk from consuming fish otherwise. The 2 sources of mercury toxicity are tooth fillings and vaccinations.
goneforgood2007 3 years ago
Sure, ask Jeremy Piven about it.
batigol47 3 years ago
Thimerosal has not been removed from all vaccines.
Regular flu shots contain thimerosal as 1 example.
goneforgood2007 3 years ago 3
I am thinking there is something in this. I have Asperger's Syndrome. I also have several fillings from years ago. Fascinating video.
beatityatube 3 years ago
They have not removed mercury yet. Just stopped putting it in new vaccines. They still use it.
warriorprince1010 3 years ago
It is not used in children's vaccinations, which is what all of these arguments are based upon.
batigol47 3 years ago
Good point.
batigol47 3 years ago
oh my god,,,oh my god,,, WHAT DO I DO NOW????
I have taken these vaccines and i have amalgam fillings. But many times worse I have given both to my children. PLEASE HELP> WHAT DO I DO TO GET RID OF MERCURY??
melissacarl2002 3 years ago
I also have these things, but I have Asperger's Syndrome and always wondered where on Earth it had come from.
beatityatube 3 years ago
and guess what? I have neurological asperger-dementia-autistic-like disease from mercury vapour exposure from inappropriate removal of fillings AFTER a hair test indicated that i have a mercury problem and BEFORE that i was almost fully healthy (esp. relatively to what is going on in me now).
jinx83pl 3 years ago
Take OSR(oxidative stress relief) it's a good chelator
DefeatADDnow 2 years ago
I had 4 fillings removed 2 months ago because of how i was feeling as i am quite a sensitive person, it was affecting me alot.
I feel so much beter for it, a changed man!
When some people say "ah they dont bother me there fine" they may not be as sensitive but i'm quite sure over time it will show symtoms.. Have them removed but detox also! x
weAreNotAloneHere 3 years ago
My question is why has a parent not killed these evil fucks at the CDC and Big Pharma. Whom are destroying the lives of children, not to mention the family itself. I can think of few crimes that warrant death, but this is surly at the top of the list.
putittogether 3 years ago 4
The comments posted below by batigol47 are not true. That is another myth, that Thimerosal has been removed from vaccines. No.
Thimerosal has NOT been removed from all vaccines. It is still present in many flu and tetanus shots.
Another myth is that one can get mercury poisoning from eating fish. This is not true. The focus on mercury poisoning as a result of eating fish takes the focus off of mercury amalgam fillings and Thimerosal containing vaccines. Focus on fillings and vaccines.
goneforgood2007 3 years ago 2
Brown seaweed is the only product with every alginate in. Laminaria japonica is its name, it works on both autism and gulf war syndrome. Dr boyd haley is a brave man, he has told the truth now act and remove that mercury. Only laminaria japonica works. [brown seaweed.]
warriorprince1010 3 years ago 2
Thank you, Dr. Haley. You will take a special seat in heaven one day, for trying to do and say what is right for the sake of humanity. I just urge everyone to check out ALL the videos on this subject, and use your own good judgement. I won't get into specifics because there are idiots floating around who want to convince me that I am a fool for believing you, and think they know better. No way.
pngcrdss 4 years ago 2
I've gone to about three different dentists in Vancouver Canada in the last 2 years,who told me that amalgam "mercury fillings" were perfectly safe and that the controversy over it was based on myth and/or bad science! Regretfully I actually let one of these dentists "bully" me into getting another ugly mercury filling!!!
OlymPigs2010 4 years ago
oly, the only thing you could have done that would have been worse was let him remove an almalgam! Only a dentist that is very very carerful should remove them... and only one every 6 months or so... and only while you are in full detox treatment.
loggerbuck 4 years ago
i had two removed and felt like shit for 2 months,, and I used a dam and oxygen and suction,, this is no joke, I have 3 left and the 2 big ones on the bottom,, I am just having the whole fucking tooth ripprd out! fuck it, I will replace one more and that's it, just to make it even, and root canals are unhealthy as well
nmste 3 years ago
It was all about profit and making sick human beings.
Sick humans AND animals are very profitable to the Conventional medical system and Veterinarian system of "medicine".
Keep up the good work Dr. Haley.
invista360 4 years ago 4
Look on my "fav" list and see the "smoking teeth" video on mercury.
Amalgams and thermisol in vaccines is the root cause of many diseases that overload our glutathione detox conjugation pathways in the liver.
It is a massive toxic insult to the body.
OBLITERATE THE A.D.A.
invista360 4 years ago
I agree with everything said about the mercury/vaccination/autism link with the exception of Dr. Haley's comment about us "evolving". Scientific evidence clearly points to the Creation of all living things by an Intelligent Designer... God. :-) That issue aside - Good Report FAIR... Thank you for posting it on You Tube!
kemeredith12 4 years ago
He did not specify whether or nothe was talking about micro or macro evolution. It is entirely consistent with the belief of creation to say that we have evolved small changes, such as those mentioned by Dr. Haley. Evolving from primates is very different.
50oldschool44 4 years ago
Will Glutathione reverse Autism? Or is Autism the after effects of mercury? Will removing most mercury reverse Autism?
zetareticuli4 4 years ago
Glutathione helps the body expel mercury. Mercury causes the symptoms of autism. Removing the mercury is the first step in recovering from the damage caused by mercury poisoning. Additional treatments can improve the rate and extent to which a person heals.
davidchenard 4 years ago
There has been no drop in the rate of Autism despite the removal of thimerosol from vaccines. This theory simply doesn't hold water, and merely distracts from finding the real reasons for autism.
batigol47 4 years ago 2
they only completely removed it around 2003, and the reason for autism is easy to see, pollution, pollution that affects pregnant women and then continues after the baby is born,vaccines are a direct vehicle for poison, and dozens of other sources as well, that is the "inconvenient truth"
nmste 4 years ago
There has been a dropping of numbers.
warriorprince1010 3 years ago
This is part of a plan for feminisation of the world.Those boys who are femenin pass the test of the niddle , perfect to fall into the gay indoctrination or to have only girls when they marry.
daniliver 4 years ago
Its like advertisement for thoothpaste. Saying alot of things that you don't really understand to make you believe it.
erkolos 5 years ago
Don't forget about the Flouride in it and what that does to a person too. The reason for putting in prison water supplies during WWII wasn't to prevent cavities then, which it never did. It was to make the prisoners "docile and stupid", and anyone who looks at the literature will find it lowers a persons IQ score an average of 20 points. That is a lot of IQ points. I couldn't spare that many - could you?
davidchenard 4 years ago
Thank you very much for sharing this invaluable information. I am an ABA therapist working with children with Autism and strongly believe that Autism is if not caused certainly brought on by or worsened by environmental factors like vaccines. I will be sharing these videos with the parents of the children I work with.
kibe29 5 years ago 2
Thanks for posting these on youtube! Parents with "autistic" children need to know what really happened to their kids. Dr. Haley is right, it is criminal!
wendysweb 5 years ago
Thanks
Your welcome, It certainly is criminal !
octomedia 5 years ago
BRAVO for speaking out and thank God for F.A.I.R.
Adrenalyn 5 years ago