For the people having hard time understanding this...What you here see is a airfoil with high AOA . air above the airfoil goes fast but air under the wing goes slow. Fast air= less air pressure / slow air =more air pressure, which result in lift because air tries to equelyze , more air onder the airfoil lifts the airfoil to reach the low pressure ,getting the airfoil in it's way move upwards
@DiNoZs1 I am glad to help you.. It is not true that air takes the same time to travel above and below an aircraft's wing.[215] This misconception is widespread among textbooks and non-technical reference books, and even appears in pilot training materials.
Was this done by experiment or by simulation? Because I find several things odd about these results...
Firstly, the flow seems way to attached to the airfoil for such angle of attack. I would expect some recirculation by the end.
Secondly, Kuta condition is not followed . As a result, the rotational is zero, and there is no lift generation. (that would be ok, if you maneged to film a starting vortex)
This doesn't strike me as accurate. Most 'simple' airfoils without the help of any kind of vortex generating device stall out at about 15 degrees alpha. This is significantly more then that, and yet still mostly (except the trailing edge there) pretty laminar. What's the point of this kind of 'wind tunnel' if it's inaccurate anyway?
I don't think the Kutta condition applies in this case, it applies only in potential flows where friction is not considered. The stagnation point at the trailing edge is caused by friction.
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity)
@DanFrederiksen those lines that climb get "sucked" to the upper section because there is a low pressure zone, caused by a acceleration of the upper section fluid.
OK, on behalf of all youtube users that work in retail or the service industry.... you're an asshole. Yet another corner we must all turn, only to find, this fucking song. Get this song out of my science!
You've got a point....My mistake. I was looking at the directional flow, and assuming. The angle of attack looks too great to sustain lift, but that's just an opinion. In any case, the chord looks too symetrical, and it's a CGI, so it's of little consequence to real aerodynamics, I guess. Take care.
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity) or
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity) or
@kikkarose Kutta is used when we represent the wing as a sink and a source, in which case it is a set of streamlines like u said. However, Kutta is not a simplification, but instead an improvement. Remember, without Kutta we would have a singularity at the trailing edge. It is also used in viscous flow, where we do get a boundary layer... in fact vscous flow is one of the reasons why we need Kutta condition
@kikkarose and in this demonstration we don't really see the Kutta condition.. its not difficult to include a Kutta condition in a 2d code, and would give a much more useful result, because you would be able yo calculate lift/drag etc (which i dont think u could in this case)
A faster speed should be used to illustrate the results as they would be expected ( rather than just lines flowing gently around a shaped and angled foil ).
Why we didnt see any downwash?
HY938DV 1 month ago
Bloodly brilliant vid! Lift requires viscosity!
DaylightDigital 2 months ago
Very good stuff man!
izu1989 3 months ago
I would love to use this video in a Boy Scout Merit Badge class. Can anyone tell me if it is copyright protected?
fquarn 4 months ago
@fquarn You wouldnt get sued for using this if you are just showing it to your class.
xDImGellinDx 4 months ago
I think it's midnight sonata
sovakuliana 6 months ago
is this modeled by inviscid flow? doesn't seem to satisfy the Kutta condition at the trailing edge.
thedaveman55 8 months ago
Please send me the link of this software
raserrobi99 9 months ago
What is the name of this song?
bbbcreations 9 months ago
surprised at that AOA it didnt stall
richarddale76 9 months ago
Man, so many misunderstandings and dogma-physics in the comments. :( but then again aerodynamics is a pretty difficult field.
allydea 9 months ago
@allydea You think this is bad? Check out some of the "free energy" videos!
raycod84 8 months ago
For the people having hard time understanding this...What you here see is a airfoil with high AOA . air above the airfoil goes fast but air under the wing goes slow. Fast air= less air pressure / slow air =more air pressure, which result in lift because air tries to equelyze , more air onder the airfoil lifts the airfoil to reach the low pressure ,getting the airfoil in it's way move upwards
DiNoZs1 10 months ago
@DiNoZs1 Oh yes, this is exactly what uneducated physics teachers are saying in high schools... Far away from the truth ;)
mabalint 7 months ago
@mabalint
Tell me the the truth then :)
DiNoZs1 7 months ago
@DiNoZs1 I am glad to help you.. It is not true that air takes the same time to travel above and below an aircraft's wing.[215] This misconception is widespread among textbooks and non-technical reference books, and even appears in pilot training materials.
mabalint 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DiNoZs1 See this NASA page, since I am not allowed to copy the url here, type in google: NASA incorrect lift theory.
mabalint 7 months ago
Comment removed
mabalint 7 months ago
There is also lift force, if the speed above and under the airfoil is exactly the same, see bats, hang gliding etc..
mabalint 7 months ago
Was this done by experiment or by simulation? Because I find several things odd about these results...
Firstly, the flow seems way to attached to the airfoil for such angle of attack. I would expect some recirculation by the end.
Secondly, Kuta condition is not followed . As a result, the rotational is zero, and there is no lift generation. (that would be ok, if you maneged to film a starting vortex)
MrQuuem 10 months ago
just seeing the words "fluid mechanics" is making me weep, that exam was a traumatising time in my life... at least its all over.
adas1023 10 months ago
scary about the count number, maybe an airplane will crash soon
IQ20000Berta 11 months ago
10 guys prefer helicopters
lucabadue 1 year ago
@lucabadue helicopter wings uses the same technology.
Dr904 11 months ago
wrong
tradward 1 year ago
This doesn't strike me as accurate. Most 'simple' airfoils without the help of any kind of vortex generating device stall out at about 15 degrees alpha. This is significantly more then that, and yet still mostly (except the trailing edge there) pretty laminar. What's the point of this kind of 'wind tunnel' if it's inaccurate anyway?
superhornet59 1 year ago
what is the name of the pice you where playing in your vid? i love that song.
Pono421 1 year ago
@Pono421 ...Beethoven, Moonlight Sonata
trollgoal 1 year ago
Kutta condition VIOLATED
AROminor 1 year ago 3
@AROminor
I don't think the Kutta condition applies in this case, it applies only in potential flows where friction is not considered. The stagnation point at the trailing edge is caused by friction.
piblo87 11 months ago
@TheTelevisedRevo Dont know if I agree. Auditory beauty goes along nicely with the beauty of nature for me.
SidewaysGts 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity)
Timuouo 1 year ago
Why Kutta condition is not being obeyed?
MrQuuem 1 year ago
weird how lines climb so high and get over the surface. looks like they should pass under
DanFrederiksen 1 year ago 26
@DanFrederiksen yup, just shows how early the pressure starts to drop on the top side
YellowCakeKid 1 year ago
@DanFrederiksen
they climb because there is air below them (only its not colored) and air pressure is reducing above them
niinja2 10 months ago
@DanFrederiksen those lines that climb get "sucked" to the upper section because there is a low pressure zone, caused by a acceleration of the upper section fluid.
aboriani 4 months ago 5
It's Beethoven, don't know why anyone would dislike that tbh.
Burstigull 1 year ago 18
@Burstigull Maybe because it's been dramatically shrinked and it loss all of the spirit.
Azurlake 1 year ago
Comment removed
mabalint 7 months ago
@Burstigull What's the name of that song?
Dragonsintuxcedos 7 months ago
@Burstigull simple they were deaf and brainless .... (@_@)
KarpatycGhost 6 months ago
Hi!
I like this clip and I wonder if i can show it in the new Science center at the Swedish airforcemuseum where I work?
/Kristina
Flygify 1 year ago
OK, on behalf of all youtube users that work in retail or the service industry.... you're an asshole. Yet another corner we must all turn, only to find, this fucking song. Get this song out of my science!
sharethispoison7 1 year ago
where is mute, aaaaa there it is:)
btw nice vid.
rambopussycat 1 year ago
off topic
COD5252 1 year ago
music?
mindhaze 1 year ago
How fast would this normally be?
iMakeMoneyOnlinee 2 years ago
...awesome.
gaaraxdancing 2 years ago
wtf
hateisjustaword 2 years ago
Which is the fluid that use used?
2mil8 2 years ago
O.K....it's a stalled wing. Are you making a connection between the song, and a stalled relationship, or are you just wasting everuones time?
criticalmass181 2 years ago
Not very stalled though. Those suction side streamlines looked pretty much attached to me!
dnealio 2 years ago
You've got a point....My mistake. I was looking at the directional flow, and assuming. The angle of attack looks too great to sustain lift, but that's just an opinion. In any case, the chord looks too symetrical, and it's a CGI, so it's of little consequence to real aerodynamics, I guess. Take care.
criticalmass181 2 years ago
@criticalmass181
At spell correctly when you're criticizing someone.
gaaraxdancing 2 years ago
why bother?
Blightmouth 2 years ago
@Blightmouth
good point.
gaaraxdancing 2 years ago
@gaaraxdancing
:D
Blightmouth 2 years ago
its called the first words witch his sings.
ryanair1313 2 years ago
"hella gay" by The Fags
socal2121 2 years ago
hey there delilah-plain white T`s
Ithinkmynameiseva 2 years ago
Its a guitar :P
Peacekeeper118 2 years ago
what happened to Kutta-Joukowski condition??
Timuouo 2 years ago
@Timuouo Kutta it's just a semplification of the problem: no boundary layer. so airfoil is only a streamline under this assumption.
sorry for my english ; )
kikkarose 1 year ago
Comment removed
Timuouo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity) or
Timuouo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kikkarose You are correct, in a 2d simulation a wing can be represented by a source and a sink, in which case the airfoil is a set of streamlines.. However, I would not call Kutta condition a simplification, but on contrary an advancement to the thin airfoil theory, right? If we look at the trailing edge, we have two solutions: 1) the flow bends around the sharp corner (in which case we have a singularity) or
Timuouo 1 year ago
@kikkarose Kutta is used when we represent the wing as a sink and a source, in which case it is a set of streamlines like u said. However, Kutta is not a simplification, but instead an improvement. Remember, without Kutta we would have a singularity at the trailing edge. It is also used in viscous flow, where we do get a boundary layer... in fact vscous flow is one of the reasons why we need Kutta condition
Timuouo 1 year ago
@kikkarose and in this demonstration we don't really see the Kutta condition.. its not difficult to include a Kutta condition in a 2d code, and would give a much more useful result, because you would be able yo calculate lift/drag etc (which i dont think u could in this case)
Timuouo 1 year ago
there exist any software that can perform simulation like this?
sneakytouchyourplace 2 years ago
fluent
medinmedin 2 years ago
The ANgle of attack should not be more than 16 degrees am i right? the average should be 13-14 to avoid turbulence
sapingil 2 years ago
You cant avoid turbulence unless ur flow is laminar. You were probably refering to "stall"
Yassoua 2 years ago
really? thanks for the info im just a freshmen in AMT course atleast i learned something from you. Thanks bro
sapingil 2 years ago
different wings will stall at different angle of attacks, but generally 16 is about stall when in straight and level flight
keeevan 2 years ago
A faster speed should be used to illustrate the results as they would be expected ( rather than just lines flowing gently around a shaped and angled foil ).
looncraz 2 years ago
thank u
laposte07 2 years ago
not correct: the flow follows the trailing edge whitout sharp angles!
ermarcio 2 years ago
Doesn't look like a simulation. Looks like a Hele-Shaw cell to me.
spychopath 3 years ago
No, I'm wrong, it is a simulation!
spychopath 3 years ago
looking at your comments was a funny experience ...
sidthegr8est 2 years ago 2
What did you use to simulate this?
bertazoid 3 years ago 2