Added: 4 years ago
From: charlesbouley
Views: 3,213
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This woman is a nut case...

  • Did that Paul guy say he respected you? What a liar he is!

  • Genevieve Wood is now the head of the Heritage Foundation. Big surprise.

  • Genevieve Wood is now the head of the Heritage Foundation. Big surprise.

  • Who cares? Why do people try to "control" other people? Just like slavery, and women's rights.

  • Karel slayed that dumb woman.

  • This woman is an idiot: 1) They're not talking about polygamy, they're talking about gay marriage. 2) If Polygamy Marriages DO become an issue, I'm SURE that Karel would be arguing FOR them rather than against them being that he's about people being able to make their own decisions and religion staying out of it. 3) Karel is NOT saying he's against Polygamy marriages. This woman is trying to change the debate. She has absolutely no validity whatsoever.

  • this woman has turrible logic

  • This is bigot who against gay marriage is stupid. He needs a brain and new penis. That bigot is jealous because gay people knows how to use their penis and straight don't. Maybe, they can watch how we use it that way, bigot and zealot can finally shut up already.

  • Thank goodness for people like Karel. We need more people to get out there and vehemently debate this.

  • I completely agree. Its a non-issue. So pass gay marriage and we can all get on with our lives. it truly isn't worth fighting over.

  • Maybe if he knocked some plaque off his teeth maybe everything wouldn't sound like 'thliperrin thuckatash"

  • Slippery Slope is a fallacy. This woman would lose a high school debate. Shame on her.

  • Bottom line: She got owned.

  • Karel is a pathetic freak. He is also an intellectual coward. I've listened to his pathetic talk show a few times and when anyone gets the upper hand on him in an argument he cuts them off. And this being the first time I've seen him, boy is he ugly. He could only be on in a freak location like San Francisco. He could not make it anywhere else. KGO is really pathetic. They used to be a good radio station, no more.

  • Well KGO just got better since karel has been fired!!!!hehehehe good luck searching for a job karel, go see obama maybe he can help you!!!lolzzzzzzzzz

  • @ciou68 funny cause he is on the air again

  • @ciou68 - Karel's now on national radio and not Bay Area radio. He's a syndicated host, and a columnist for two national magazines meaning that he's reaching a lot more people across the country AND online. You were saying? LOLZZZZZZZ...moron.

  • @kitsa42 Who cares, for all I knew Karel was dead! I will not listen to him nor will i read his columns in the magazines he supposedly writes for.........................Re­tard!

  • @ciou68 - So, essentially, you're wrong about Karel and you just like to insult him? Yeah, that's what I thought: no brains whatsoever.

  • Only KGO hires freaks. Karel, Bernie, Ray (the flame) Ron Owens. All slobs...

  • juscurius heres a little karel tid-bit, karel was actually a recording artist..back in 1996 he was in chicago at a dance music summit, promoting his then single, this guy actually had the nerve to get up on stage and "attempt" to sing. and sing "badly"...i find it even more disturbing that john "jellybean" benitez actually believed in him enough to produce his record...things that make you go hmmmmm........

  • I want to strangle that woman with her pearls.

  • I think marriage on the whole is a fucked up idea designed to keep idiots from sleeping around.

  • She says nothing about Same-Sex Marriage...nothing at all.

  • that woman is so foolish

  • wow, Genevive was completely irrelevant.

  • Paul's argument:

    - Dissappointment for Rosie being lesbo is not the issue.

    - Sociology shows the how behavior of people changes over time. Psychology goes down ot hte individual. Psychology shows children with same-sex parents show no drastic difference. Sociology has no argument against same-sex marriage.

    - "Ideally" does not exist in psychology.

    - Opinions are personal and not real.

    - I hear no reason yet why this is so dangerous.

  • her argument:

    - "It will be" is not an argument, it is a personal prediction.

    - Issues that are not issues are not valid in an argument. (polygamy)

    - She is in favor of polygamy but is in denial of it.

    - She makes no argument of real consequence. I hear no bad things, only things said in a bad tone.

    - Why is she still refusing to argue the facts he lays out by citing a non-issue.

    - Why is she defending polygamists if she does not approve of them?

  • Mayor West? I LOVE IT!!!

  • Wow, I love that 'Gay Marriage' teaser.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more