Added: 1 year ago
From: KingHeathen
Views: 6,200
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (477)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mohammed is a real historical person, he was one of the greatest tactitions and won many battles. If you lik Alexander then you will like the story's, the historically correct storys about Mohammed the General are real. Research and cross reference.

  • Muhammad never had a face because he never ever existed, he is a fictional characters set up by the Quran Authors of the Vatican

  • The reason Muhammad is meant not to be depicted or drawn to a specific image because he is not supposed to be idolized (the pre-islamic arabs were mostly pagans who worshiped idols). The prophet didn't want to be idolized are viewed as godly. I think it's the overly-sensitive muslims, not the religion. I honestly don't care what you do... Just wondering... if you think Muhammad (sws) never existed how did the caliphate take over the middle east? Who were the Abbasids related to? gd vid thumbs up

  • @xArabianxBeastx I appreciate the comment and wish more saw it the way you do...

    That said...I never said Muhammad OR Jesus didn't exist...I'm also not saying there wasn't a Hercules or Achilles or Hera or even a Medusa...I just take exception to the details of the stories attributed to them.

  • @SupremeARA915 because it was a good reason for them to bomb? because they are TERRORISTS?

  • the last one was best!

  • maybe its because muhammed was ugly as a cow. his face would be offensive to anyone who looked at.

  • we try to stay away from what happened to the Christians, they have made so many types of images of supposedly Jesus, that they have this image in their head of how he looks and when they see the picture, they want to worship it. I've seen "jesus pictures" with a trimmed beard, big beard, darker skin, lighter skin...it's disrespectful.

  • ok! look, showing muhammed is not a problem! the problem is when you linked " Muhammed" to something related to terrorist thing such as a bomb or stuff like that.

    I'm a muslim :)

  • @a7medsarCA The cartoon in question here didn't attach him to anything...in fact, it was extremely positive.

    I'm glad that YOU seem to feel that way...I wish others were the same.

  • @a7medsarCA

    trying to depict RasulAllah(Peace and Blessings be upon him) is the problem...whether related to terrorist or not.

    Not everything is appropriate for joking and entertainment...comedy should know it's limits

  • @a7medsarCA

    Oh believers ( christian, jews ) and non-believers ( atheist ) we respect your believe, so you do the same. Prophet Mosses,Jesus & Prophet Mohammad

    ( peace be upon them) are among the most genuine prophets in the history of mankind civilization. Insulting any prophet is nothing but a pure madness.

    so fear God ( Allah-SWT ) and stop your stupid big mouth. one day morning you will not be able to see the day light and find yourselves in the fire of hell.

    Best of luck.

  • ok then my thumbnails are pics of porn? wtf

  • Take all those pics you guys r gonna draw make a wallpaper out of it, stick it in front of a mosque or two or a hundred.

  • cuz his face is ugly ;)

  • u need a mug

  • When is the next draw Muhammed day?

  • You are dumber than a bag of hammer... read before you make a clip D**K Neck.

  • @BeDaChange Before you call someone "dumb," perhaps you should check your grammar.

  • @KingHeathen like i care about grammar... my grammar should and will not hurt any ones felling or so .. but you my friend.. know that your stuff make some people mad but still investing your time and go with it .. is pretty lame.

    and by the way English is my 4th language just for your info, and keep up the nonsense work my man hope some day you grow out of this child hood that you are stuck in.

  • @BeDaChange gotta say i agree with kingheathen here, the only reason people are drawing pictures of muhammed is because the islamic community kicked up such a fuss and acted childish in the 1st place. In any event muhammed was not god, he was a prophet, a man, enlightened as he may have been. Do you think muhammed as enlightened as he apparently was, would be upset about the pictures or would he rise above it? when you answer that you will know the quality of the man whose teachings you follow

  • Look! It's the prophet muhammad the hutt!

  • @KingHeathen protest my religion and call me a terrorist, although it really hurts, if for some reason their rights all of a sudden were violated because what they were doing was offense, I'd stand up for them. if you are not allowed to draw a picture of Muhammad, I shouldn't be allowed to draw a picture of you. common sense. &you're right; nobody should cower @the hands of extremists. they or worthless scum of the earth.I'll spit in their eye before they kill me, not follow or agree with them.

  • @paniuroczy Thanks for the response. I'm glad to see that you seem to understand and agree with the points I was trying to get across. I understand that it's part of the doctrine that you aren't to worship Muhammad's image...but who is going to worship my simple little cartoons? It's really silly that so many of the extremists let themselves get so worked up when the thing they are supposed to be avoiding isn't even remotely likely.

  • @KingHeathen thank you, and I couldn't agree more. I might be offended by some ignorant remarks or offensive pictures, but I always am million & one times more offended when a muslim acts hateful/stupid in the name of Islam. we are in america and we have freedom of speech. if some of these ppl don't like it then they can leave; they are just making fools out of themselves.

    anyways, I've watched a few of your vids and you seem to be a very smart man, though I may disagree w a few points. gd :o)

  • @KingHeathen Geek2core point is right on

    Look at jesus, No one really knows how he looks. We are so far off that we think Jesus had blue eyes n blonde hair when that's not true

    Why's is there krishna statue, statues of buddha, cross sign? Because at the end people start to worship them and we have seen this through out history

    I do agree that muslim's around the world shouldn't be offended and learn to deal with them by explaining.:)

  • @324582782 I'm a buddhist, and I don't worship Buddha. He was not a god, or even a prophet, but an enlightened human being. To worship Buddha would be wrong, but to follow his teachings is the best I can do

  • @daverigby23 but most do

  • @324582782 All the buddhists I know, which is quite a few, follow his teachings, they DO NOT worship the Buddha

  • @daverigby23 many also worship. Do your research

  • @32458278 I know more about it than you do, and don't need to do any homework

  • @daverigby23 you surely don't know that budhisim is a very complex religion and its hard to say if buddhist worship budhha or not. Although buddha did not want his follower to worship him, Many have started to worship him especially in India.

  • @324582782 I wouldn't even call it a religion, rather it's a philosophy. Buddhists are mostly agnostic, there might be a god there might not be. The best thing to do is to live your life according to the teachings of the Buddha. I think you'll find that if buddhists pray, then it's for the well-being of former spirits, not to a god, and certainly not to Buddha as a god

  • @daverigby23 are you saying that no one in this world worships Buddha?

  • @324582782 I'm saying that if they do worship Buddha, then they are mistaken, However, they won't be put to death for it, Buddhism, as I'm sure you know, genuinely is tolerant; unlike most religions

  • @daverigby23 Exactly people do worship Buddha.

  • @324582782 Buddha isn't worshiped. He isn't a deity. He was a man (with the title "the enlightened one") Buddha was a man, Buddhists (for the most part) are atheists. I say for the most part because many "new aged" Buddhists have merged their beliefs. 

  • @KingHeathen I'm muslim, and am a descendent of him through my family. reason you can't show him is because religiously you can't worship him. you can show picture of him for historical reasons, etc. you have the right to draw whatever you want. I was a bit offended with your vid, but I'm not crazy irrational. voltaire said "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it", and this applies in all areas. if people are going to go out in the streets and

  • I think I can sum this whole issue can be summed up in one sentence: Muslims are butt hurt.

  • whatever it is,u must respect others religion & ISLAM is not like what u think!

  • @bellameer36 Why must I respect someone else's religion? What about their superstitious beliefs is so deserving of "respect?" Should I respect someone's lucky rabbit's foot too?

  • @bellameer36 Totally agree.. this unlimited freedom of speech is really poisoning our brains we are really hurting our future generations. we need to teach each other how to get along, not how to be divided, unless we want to be used against each other moor than how bad we are being used.

    Peace spread it, it don't cost anything.

  • @BeDaChange the only way that will ever happen is if we abolish all religion and come to some middle ground as to how we are supposed to live our lives and how we worship, who we worship, but that is a long time coming as most people are tied to their silly beliefs

  • Hey my bad for the last comment !!!! Plzz accept my heartly apology!!!!!! I wasn't thinking lol.....I'm not Going to watch anything related to religion again lol.. I don't wana hate anybody, it's not me :)

  • U r a fucking dickhead ugly motherfucker!!! Probably u grown up masterbating watching your mom in shower.. U hav no respect asshole!! U probably will die in a tragedy ppl just pray for him I just hope it's not that tragic ;)

  • @sendmurtuza That's nice....now run along and play, grown ups are talking.

  • 2:58 made my day. I laughed soooo damn hard

  • Draw muhammed day kicked their ass.

  • lol

  • Because Muhammad is fucking ugly.

  • what's wrong about is simply that you offend others by doing so and also if no one has seen the Prophet no one can create an image. The thing about an image is it loses meaning and people worship the image rather than God. If you think you're defending your self by this method you are wrong because what everyone should fear is God and by making a video you cannot hide from God. He gives EVERYONE what they deserve so I'd be too scared of God to put down ANY religion Including Islam.

  • @princ3ssrizz0 Yeah, well...I don't believe in your god, so I'm not scared of him. As to offending people...You don't have the right to not be offended. What if I told you that I was offended by you breathing? Are you going to stop breathing just to spare my offended feelings? At some point you have to accept where the boundaries lie and where you being offended loses out to someone else choosing to live their own life.

  • @KingHeathen hey live your own life no one's stopping you just don't offend people on purpose. No one can actually be offended by someone's breathing it's ridiculous. I wouldn't take your beliefs and what you hold sacred and disrespect it and then rub it on your face that oh I have the right to do this. having the right doesn't mean you should do it to hurt others. it wouldn't be my breathing offending anyways it would be something I do or have done or said that makes you want me to not breathe.

  • @princ3ssrizz0 You missed the point. You can be offended for any reason. It's not my duty to make sure you aren't. Maybe you are offended that I would wear my favorite sports team jersey to your sports teams game. Maybe you are offended that I drive a sports car instead of a hybrid. It doesn't matter. If I want to make a cartoon, I can do so. It's not up to you (or anyone else) whether or not your find it offensive that I get to make the cartoon.

  • You are so ignorant. Qur'an does not explicitly forbid images of Muhammad, but there are a few hadith which have explicitly prohibited Muslims from creating visual depictions of figures under any circumstances. Islam is strictly monotheist and we prohibit any visual depictions of the prophets. The key concern is that the use of images can encourage idolatry, where the image becomes more important than what it represents.

  • @geek2core Are you a Muslim?

  • @geek2core

    OK, so then you should only care if MUSLIMS are drawing Mohammad! ;-)

    The rest of us don't accept the Qur'an as any sort of law or authority...

    Plus, the non-Muslims - especially the atheists - would hardly start worshiping (the picture) of Muhammad anyway. ;-)

  • @geek2core i dont see how two jews putting him in their cartoons is idolitry and it seems to me that not drawing mohammed has turned into another form of idolitry

  • @geek2core idolotry is srs busns.

  • @geek2core But this is crazy! If Kingheathen was muslim you would have a point but he is not! So your hadith should have absolutely no meaning for him! And you should not have any right to complain about what he draws! What if he started a religion called "The new age muhammad drawers" and in that religion you had to draw mohammad at least 5 times a day? Would you not defend his right to practice that religion without interference from you????? THINK!

  • why shouldn't we be allowed to show Muhammad? its our right to do so, It's part of our right, part of our freedom of speech! who are they to tell me i cannot express myself.

  • when people lose respect for each other, then they just try to find anything to ridicule each other. its nothing new history and therefore not so amazing. but its kinda sad to see all these people taking the poison of hatred and leaving the warm strength of solidarity. who knows when these things will end! may be never!

  • For the people saying that only a few muslims are extremists...YOU ARE WRONG.

    Extremeism is a relative term. Relative to secular beliefs many many many religious teachings are extreme. Lets take homosexuality as an example..most religious people believe that their just god will torture homosexuals for all of eternity for the simple act of showing eachother love. Does that not seem a little extreme to you? It seems extreme to me.

  • @anotherutterance I wouldn't consider a mental thought to be as extreme as a physical action. For instance, I wouldn't see the above scenario as extreme but I would if they actually went out and tortured homosexuals.

    I'm an Atheist though and homosexuals still weird me out a bit. (Doesn't mean i'll torture them though, i'm just saying)

  • spent 8 months in iraq... so this is the funniest thing i've seen in a while

  • @Godusesamac I don't think you are understanding what I'm asking for...

    I don't want you to insult my mother because it might hurt her feelings. I don't want you to insult my wife, because she's liable to kick you in the shins and then I have to bail her out of jail for assault! LOL! WHY are we not to show Muhammad? What is so insulting about just showing his face?

    Many have given the actual answer, however, none were believers...I'm waiting for one of those before I respond.

  • I understand that the very idea of hiding and concealing his identity is retarded and there's no logical reason behind it aside from a verse, but the more important question that I have to ask in response to your question is... Why do you want to portray the prophet of a religion that isn't yours to begin with? What possible gain do you receive from depicting him?

    Telling everyone to start showing him seems like nothing more than ignorance. Just leave it well enough alone.

  • @adventseph So we should ALLOW censorship? We should ALLOW these people to make death threats and just be expected to get their way? It doesn't matter what reason you or someone else may want to make a cartoon depicting their prophet...you have the RIGHT to do so! And they do NOT have the right to not be offended.

  • @KingHeathen

    I'm not saying we should allow them to make death threats or that we should put down our rights. I'm asking why we should be portraying him in the first place. So what if we have the right to do so? Just because we can, doesn't mean we should. There's no possible reason to do it aside from pissing them off and starting pointless debates about what entails freedom. The whole thing can just be bypassed and is unnecessary to begin with.

  • @adventseph Why shouldn't we? And why are they exempt from getting pissed off?  Was this "bypassed" when Theo Van Gogh was murdered? What about when the buildings were burned over Danish cartoons? Sorry, but they don't get a free pass from me. I DO NOT bow down to censorship and this is a protest to let all that feel that someone should die for insulting their archaic religion know that we are not afraid of them! And maybe, just maybe, it will help some of them rethink it.

  • @KingHeathen

    Alright I agree that what happened to Theo Van Gogh and the Danish buildings was wrong. Van Gogh's death must've been excruciatingly painful to say the least. I also agree that they aren't exempt from being pissed off. What i'm trying to say is that Islam is a religion to 2.3 billion adherents and only a couple hundred thousand or so of that number is the Al Qaeda and other extremists. It's wrong to insult and show disrespect to all those people because of the actions of a few.

  • @adventseph I accept that the radicals are a small percentage...but if you think it's only "a couple hundred" you are deluding yourself. More than "a couple hundred" show up for their rallies in a single city.

    As to respecting those other moderates, where are they SPEAKING OUT AGAINST these people? Their silence is the same as approving it in the eyes of the radical. I WANT to get their attention so that they stand up and tell the radicals that they are making the problem worse.

  • @KingHeathen Dude you just pulled me out of context. I said a couple hundred THOUSAND, not just a couple hundred. So what if more than a couple hundred show up for rallies? They aren't extremists just because they defend their beliefs. By extremists I was referring to people that take any form of violence as retaliation.

  • @adventseph my mistake on the "thousand" part...must have been reading too fast and missed that. The people at the rallies are chanting "We want blood! We want blood!" You don't classify that as "extreme?"

  • @KingHeathen A bunch of people at a rally don't symbolize an entire religious sect. That would be generalizing. Either way, it's always the extremists that go out and rally about anger. Otherwise they wouldn't be called extremists.

    On a side note, I read this hilarious sign on the internet once in which this extremist had a sign saying "We condom hate you". The guy who took the picture figured they might've been trying to say "Condemn" but instead he replied with "We condom hate you too".

  • @adventseph You are completely missing the point. A rally where the people chant "Give me liberty or give me death" are far different in motives than one that says "give me liberty or I'll kill your children."

    I'll ask again, what percentage of Muslims do you think are extremists?

  • @KingHeathen Where has there ever been a rally in which someone held a sign saying "I'll kill your children"? I've seen some pretty harsh stuff on those signs during their rallies but I don't recall them wanting to kill kids now.

    As for an answer to your question I think around 20 to 30 percent of the muslim population are extremists. The others are political members, moderates, Sunnis, Shias, Baha'i followers, and various other groups.

  • @KingHeathen Sorry for the double post but the character limit is annoying.

    Do you have any idea what would happen to the moderates if they spoke out? They would end up far worse than Van Gogh. They'd get tortured and killed. You insult them because they live a life that could end if they spoke out?

    I'm pretty sure you wanted to employ your tactic of giving them numerous enemies because then they wouldn't be able to retaliate. Telling moderates to speak up is asking them to get killed.

  • @adventseph If the moderates spoke out IN NUMBERS the same way I'm suggesting we do here, then the extremists will realize that they are the vast minority and will cower back into their caves! You seem to contradict yourself here. Let's clarify: What percentage of Muslims do you think would be violent towards moderates?

  • @KingHeathen Regardless of numbers, the extremists are still the ones with the guns. Numbers become useless when one side has guns. If two rival gangs go at it with each other and the gang on the left is nearly 100 times in amount, they will still get horribly murdered by the gang on the right because despite their small numbers, they still have the guns which make mowing down enemies an easy task to perform.

  • @adventseph So your solution is for everyone to live in fear of the bullies? Sorry, I'm not afraid of them and if the moderates showed that as well, there would be no need to be. This has been shown throughout history to be the case.

  • @KingHeathen Better to live in fear than to not live at all. Either they give in to the oppressive taliban or get shot or stoned to death. I think I understand in that light why they don't speak up. The only time I think the moderates should speak up is when they're liberated from under the taliban. This has been seen before when Saddam went into hiding and the people were no longer afraid of public demonstrations against him. Also, you aren't afraid of them because you're nowhere near them.

  • @adventseph Well, I entirely disagree there. I'd rather die fighting than live cowering. It seems we just see the world differently in this regard.

  • @KingHeathen Alright then so we have different views on the matter. I guess we can just agree to disagree then.

  • @KingHeathen Also I still don't understand the need to depict him in the first place. I get it that we shouldn't let them think they can use fear to control us but over a span of a couple thousand years they have never requested more than that they should be left alone. We are always the attackers with events such as Inquisitions, Crusades, Ottomon's Destruction, Afghanistan, and Iraq. At this point, why not just stop angering them further. They hate us for a reason.

  • @KingHeathen

    Oh and on a side note, Islam isn't an archaic religion. Something is only archaic when its literally been tossed aside. Islam is kind of the biggest religion in the world so it's kind of very much alive and consistent.

    Mesopotamian Mythology is archaic or the Mayans or something but definitely not Islam. If what you meant was that the teachings of the religion are barbaric, then saying that would've sufficed.

  • @adventseph From dictionary*com:

    1. marked by the characteristics of an earlier period; antiquated: an archaic manner; an archaic notion.

    2.(of a linguistic form) commonly used in an earlier time but rare in present-day usage except to suggest the older time, as in religious rituals or historical novels.

    5. primitive; ancient; old: an archaic form of animal life.

    Tell me which part of that doesn't sound like Islam.

  • @KingHeathen I'll reply to each definition using the same number.

    1. I will agree with this since it's basically saying anything old is archaic. But that also pretty much means that every single religion on Earth (aside from the neo ones) is archaic.

    2. This is false since Islam isn't rare in present day usage as it is the world's largest religion and all. Also Islam doesn't focus on the past, they focus on the old ways being modernized for a newer time.

    5. I'll also agree with this one.

  • @Godusesamac Yes....I said that....but WHY?

  • I love you King Heathen.

  • You did forget his 5 y/o wife!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Gods are narcissistic constructs that are particularly fragile. By representing them in a painting, drawing, etc, a person can then test or scrutinize or humanize them.

    Gods of the past have been too visible and testable to survive. God-kings bleed and die, Idol gods weather or break , and painted gods look human and fragile, no matter how big and intimidating they are painted.

  • Hey KH. I've read that there is no verse in the Quran that specifically prohibits the images of the prophet Mohammad. The prohibition appears to come from the Hadith, which basically describes the reported actions and sayings of the prophet. Iranian and Turkish muslims have been depicting Muhammad for centuries. The hadith is concerned about worship being attributed to Mohammad (shirk) should his image be presented. However, no one who is depicting mohammad today is in danger of doing that fFs!

  • my friends middle name is muhammad, would they find that offensive

  • @cecoman314

    No, They would be out for blood if you, say, called a teddy bear Muhammed, though.

  • **standing ovation**

  • Okay . . . Muhammad as Jabba the Hut made me LOL. :-) Good video.

  • "You can't make fun of Muhammad because he's a religious figure. Buddha, stop snorting coke in front of the kids!"

  • what's not so offensive about muhammad's face...? i can understand why muslims don't want him to be depicted in any way... his face kills children as soon as they see it...

  • fuck jesus and muhammed

  • Makes you wonder about all the people called Mohammed. Are they allowed out at allor will it bring down a fatwah on their parents' heads?

  • What I find incredibly craven is that a poster on revolutionmuslim . com says that Matt & Trey could end up like Theo Van Gogh if they air the episodes, yet when called on this threat the person is too cowardly to acknowledge it as a threat and says something like, 'Oh no, it wasn't a threat, it was just a comment on what could happen to them.'

  • [continued]

    This is getting way out of hand. How can we let these people dictate what we can and can't do in terms of free speech. The fact that TV networks, newspapers, book stores, etc back down to such threats makse the problem worse. It just gives these cowards incentive to further threaten us. We need to stop caving in to these people.

  • @Textra1 I absolutely agree, Textra...this is why US policy has always been "We DO NOT negotiate with terrorists!"

  • @Textra1 - The problem with freedom of speech in this country is that TV indoctrinates people to disrespect other people and then say, "it's a free country!!!". Everything is sexual, drug related, or racist(black comics making fun of whites ppl all the time). It's just getting out of hand...my opinion.

  • @JustListenRecords

    I do not think free speech is getting out of hand. I think you're exaggerating that EVERYTHING is sex, drug or race related. Do you think you should be the arbiter of taste and what constitutes free speech?

    That you get to voice your opinion is because of the freedom of speech. Kind of ironic that you would use this very freedom to voice the opinion that the freedom goes too far and should be reduced.

  • @Textra1 - you don't think so...why does every commercial need a woman in a bikini...toothpaste, car, deodorant, even gum...i have kids and the tv has a block option but you basically have to block everything and get them back into books. Controlled media and music is just bad influence. It's alot harder to raise kids now...because of the outside influences...

  • @Textra1 - I have two daughters and the reason why I rather them read than watch tv is because of the commercials. Women are revered in this country when they have nice bodies...what about their intelligence(who care's right? lol). Women are now having kids at 45-50 years old because society told them to be single and party. Now their GOD given instict to have kids, kicks in lol.

  • @JustListenRecords I'd be lying if I tried to deny that sexuality isn't used as often as possible to sell products, but the better question is "So what?" Don't shelter your kids! It's best that they are exposed to it and understand it. If you block it all away, what will they do with it later on when it's dumped in their lap as an adult? Making it taboo only serves to make it more interesting to them!

    I also think your "statistic" on women having kids is entirely bogus.

  • @JustListenRecords

    only afew women have kids that late in the US we have a high number of females having kids at 15 or so. so the bigger problem is having kids young not old

  • Mohammed married Aisha, who was 6 years old, and he consummated the marriage when she was 9 years old.

    That's fucking sick, and this is the "last messenger" of God? Nice role model.

  • BLASPHEMY CHALLENGE PART 2

    I deny the existence of allah and I think his prophet is bull shit.

    See you in hell mother fuckers

  • Would Islam get in the twentieth century? God damn Muslims, grow up!

  • I've been watching South Park since it first came out like 13yrs ago, and i have never been so disappointed than i was last week. I was angry at Comedy Central, Stone/Parker, and especially Muslims. The reason terrorism is so successful is because people keep backing down in the face of danger. When the muslims threatened Stone/Parker they should not have been intimidated and instead aired the episode. This is our RIGHT to free speech, and no one is willing to fight or sacrifice anything for it

  • Nice Drawings.

  • lol I gave him tits and in another pic put eyes like the burka on his crotch with an Ares statue as his base . :)

  • Cool video! Faved!

  • @GrudgyDiablo

    Muhammad was a woman... and to add insult to injury... this is a "crusade" against all of you free speech oppressing extremists.

    look up "crusades" and you will see why this is offensive

  • In 2007 a British schoolteacher, voluntarily teaching young children in a school in Sudan, allowed them to name the class Teddy Bear. The children chose the name: Mohammed, actually named after one of the boys in the class. After a complaint from a Muslim receptionist, the teacher was arrested, jailed & threatened with 40 lashes & 6 months jail. The school was closed for 6 months. After the intervention of the UK government, she was finally deported after 2 weeks. Google 'Gillian Gibbons'

  • Fuck yeah Muhammad the Hut!

  • @KingHeathen

    I must be a half tard, where the fuck is the video response option?

  • @PainAddict666 it's right next to the text box for making a comment without responding to another comment. you might have to click in the text box to make it appear, i can't remember. i felt retarded too. took me like ten minutes to figure it out.

  • @PainAddict666 Click the text box to make a comment at the top, then the link appears on the right side (stupid, yes, I know)

  • @KingHeathen

    Thanks, I figured it out eventually.

    Have you mirrored Thunderf00t's vid yet? If not, get on it!

  • Brilliant editorial. You make an excellent point.

    I suppose the vexing issue about all this is that, if Muhammed lived in an American neighborhood, he would be required by law to go door to door explaining to all the people all about how he was a registered sex offender. (It seems to have been written in the holy book all about how he married a six year old girl when he was an old man.) I guess I don't blame the Jihadis for wanting to keep his face under raps.

    Subbed friended.

  • @AdamEtheredge Oh shit, did that offend anybody?! I guess I really need to run for my life now, and get a body guard, pull a Salman Rushdie and go into hiding.

  • Muahmmad briefly appears in my lastest "Brief Bible Blunders."

    You raise an excellent point about the identification of the image with the person. In fact, it's such a good point that I want to listen to it again and think about it some more because it seems applicable to religious objections to "blasphemous" portrayals of various holy people. Well done.

  • KH, no one knows what he looked like....... and who cares??? I cant believe that some people dont have anything better to do. The more I hear about stupid people like that, the more I like my dog.

  • lol

  • Muhammad dictated that images of him not be shown for "reasons of idolatry" while he, himself, was sticking his tongue in the big, black pussy of the Kabaa.

    Muhammad didn't want pictures of him made because he didn't want his numerous enemies to know what he looked like. He saw the assassinations of Greek leaders who had their images carved in marble and took measures to save himself the same fate.

    Es tu, Brute?

    Simple as.

  • Fuck Mohammed (PIGS be upon him)

  • Muhummad the Hut. That was great! We need more images like that! =p

  • @LeksServices - I mean, that should be a new idol for us. The Invisible Pink Unicorn. The Flying Teapot. The Flying Spaghetti Monster. And now ...  Muhammad the Hut! XD

  • Haha suicide bomber Muhammad looks like he'd be in Superjail

  • I love how there is no swear filter on you tube comments.

    Fuck-Fuckity-Fuck-Fuck.

  • Wow, you got balls. Let's show the crazy Muslims we won't be intimidated. To quote another South Park episode, "words are like bullets." Insults and criticism only have power if the target gives them power by believing them. If their only response to criticism is violence then they validate the insults and thus profane their own religion.

    Here is some commentary from Parker and Stone about the Super Best Friends episode (which originally aired before 9/11).

    /watch?v=h7Py7rkHadA

  • my personal favorite of muhammad being blasphemed is the drawing of his face suckling on the end of a huge, veiny, uncircumsized cock. look it up!

  • everybody, look up 'muhammad sucking a dick' on google images, and click on the first image that comes up (assuming that safesearch option is off).

    spread it far and wide. and if you ever need reminded of the justification for this 'blasphemy', a picture of a crying woman being buried up to her chest so she can not move as she receives a stoning (because she got raped), should serve as good reason to eject this shit religion off the face of the earth. so blaspheme away.

  • @Thrashaero

    In the Mid East the attitude is, Women are for children men are for pleasure.

    and we are assuming the 1000 virgins are girls.

    soldiers from T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia) to the troops in Iraq, have documented how mid east soldiers celebrate victory by cornholing each other.

    And there are plenty of Muslims who have religious icons of Muhammad.

    It's an excuse to attack free speech, Its not the images, its that we think.

  • Stop watching Glenn Beck...

    Using his maneurisms and style of speech, doesn't make your point come across any clearer, it just shows that you show your role models bizarrely...

  • @TommyBergen

    what?

    just because people show emotion in their talking doesn't necessarily make them like Glenn Beck. I highly doubt KingHeathen enjoys glenn beck at all. and your likening his speaking to his style shows how ignorant you are of how people talk in general. you need to get out more.

  • laaame

  • Hahaha, Jabba the Hut Muhammad

  • I honestly don't understand it. We live in a country with free speech, where people constantly make fun of other religions at will, be it jokes, stereotypes of parodies. And while there are a small amount of people do get mad, most either laugh or don't care, and rarely does anyone threaten death over it.  But when Mohammad and Islam are involved, I hear huge outcries for violence and retribution! I just don't get it... Also, would a picture of Mohammad "Ali" work?

  • The fact that I look at this video for taking courage and bravery to make saddens me.

  • I'm offended by Fox news. I'm offended every time I see a church, or a religious organization. But I don't threaten to kill them... Well, not out loud at least.

  • I thought the reason why it was forbidden to show images was *in theory* to show that he was just a prophet and shouldn't be worshiped as if he was Allah or the Messiah or whatever. Oddly it seemed to have the opposite effect making people obey the rule without thinking of its intent causing him to be the one "taboo" topic even though Allah isn't even immune.

  • @Aweman11 That's a perfectly logical explanation!!!

    I understand it!

  • Man, great job on the editing! I assume, using the new camera that you got awhile back? I think this captures the chiaroscuro just fine and your raw-straight-cuts that's very popular on YouTube creates a more dynamic and fresh feeling towards your videos and ideas.

  • @Drathy Yeah, but the mic sucks ass! I'm still playing with it to get it better though.

  • Awesome, and I'll take the idea and run with it in a video. By the way, I did not see anything in the least offensive in your video except that horrid stuff you drink.

  • im not gonna blow up or anything because i watched this will i?

  • Love the new lighting. I can see your face.

  • good idea

    I can't draw very well but I'll give it a shot

  • Why do you say it didn't air? It did

  • @gimmethegepgun Southpark airs at multiple time slots. Depending on where you live, you'll see it at different times or on a replay. I tuned in at midnight for the replay where they aired the banned book episode instead. I went to the website the next day to watch it and they said it had been pulled and wouldn't be aired until they got an acceptable version.

    That's what I based it on as the episode was pulled, but apparently some areas still saw it at the earliest slots.

  • @Why don't you just watch it from an unofficial source? You can find almost anything on the internet. I watched it on mega video this time.

  • @KingHeathen Ah, ok. But even then, they bleeped every mention of his name and they bleeped a few entire sentences at the end. I wasn't even aware that it was Comedy Central that wussed out on it, I thought they had done it tongue-in-cheek, but I guess not. Honest mistake, amirite?

  • Quick rundown of part 2: WARNING: SPOILER ALERT!!

    His name is bleeped through the episode. Guy in the mascot outfit was really Santa. Streisand attacks, is defeated by singing with Neil Diamond. Buddha does more coke. Guys try to clone Muhammad so they can give the clones to gingers and celebs. Gingers capture him, team up with celebs for goo machine. Tom Cruise gets goo transfer, gets "CENSORED", yet when Seaman attacks him, is joked about having Seamen on his back, as there is no "goo".

  • I am offended by this video.

    I am offended because your images of mohamhead do not show him molesting children.

  • Muhammad's bitch face must be that fucking ugly. Fuck the censorship and fuck muslims for being such whinny bitches

  • Southpark ripped on everything BUT Muhammad. I don't understand how they can insult other Gods, but not Muhammad. It's retarded hypocrisy!

    Seriously!!! What the fuck.

    The part Muhammad played in the show wasn't even offensive to Muhammad.

    The bleeps ruined the entire episode for me too. I can't believe the long bleep at the end too. The episode was completely ruined from it, and what is happening to freedom of speech is making me nauseous

    Religion is trying to bring us back to the bronze age! :(

  • I thought the fallow up episode was aired on the 21st, or are you talking about the episode of south park to air on the 28th?