How does he explain all that coal with chalk layers? There is not that much vegetation on the earth for a flood to make it. Chalk is made in shallow seas and take a long time to make.
55 layers of trees? At 3 minutes I think he proves himself wrong. ?!?
Oh come on! Why can't you find some actual EVIDENCE instead of videos by this moron?
For anyone who's new, the presenter of the video is Walter Veith, an animal nutritionist so incompetent he thinks cats were, and can be, vegetarian. He is NOT a geologist!
well if he is so dum maybe you can tell me how vegan cats and dogs do hapily exist today. google it booble boy. and yet again another bigot who thinks he is right without offering evidence at the table. this must be the millionth bigot response who presents no evidence.
Marine fossils found in a forest? You can also find marine fossils at the top of Mount Everest. What does this show? Plate tectonics make the Earth move!
Your speaker has made several arguments that are nothing more then arguments based on personal incredulity. This is a logical falicy and not "evidence" which would support the conclusion that this planet was covered by a global flood.
In my 20 years working as a geologist, I have yet to see a single piece evidence that supports the conclusion that the world was once covered by a flood, a few thousand years ago. It is highly unlikely that watching another 5 series DVD will change my mind.
mr geologist. maybe a verticaly fossilised whale in what aparently took mil or bil years to form. yet a whale carcase is fully disintergrated in less then a month? what about an iron pot found in coal rock layer dated 300mil years old? eorsion vs uplift we should all be covered by water and no fossil record present?
erosion rate vs suposed uplift rate. erosion is much faster. if the fossil record on top of mnt everest is mill or bil years old then erosion would have wubed it all out. but the mountin suposedly keeps lifting slowly. that maybe, but the erosion is faster and no fossil record should be there at all
How does he explain all that coal with chalk layers? There is not that much vegetation on the earth for a flood to make it. Chalk is made in shallow seas and take a long time to make.
55 layers of trees? At 3 minutes I think he proves himself wrong. ?!?
Are you sure this didn't take a lot of time?
gregrutz 2 months ago in playlist More videos from ninnzbinnz
Gee Wizz, It was a forest, then it was underwater, then it was a forest again and then underwater again, then a forest again.
It must have taken a very long time.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Oh come on! Why can't you find some actual EVIDENCE instead of videos by this moron?
For anyone who's new, the presenter of the video is Walter Veith, an animal nutritionist so incompetent he thinks cats were, and can be, vegetarian. He is NOT a geologist!
voiceoftruth2006 4 years ago
well if he is so dum maybe you can tell me how vegan cats and dogs do hapily exist today. google it booble boy. and yet again another bigot who thinks he is right without offering evidence at the table. this must be the millionth bigot response who presents no evidence.
ninnzbinnz 4 years ago
Marine fossils found in a forest? You can also find marine fossils at the top of Mount Everest. What does this show? Plate tectonics make the Earth move!
lawilson200 4 years ago
yeh and did you watch the hole thing or just once sentence not even worth answering
ninnzbinnz 4 years ago
Your speaker has made several arguments that are nothing more then arguments based on personal incredulity. This is a logical falicy and not "evidence" which would support the conclusion that this planet was covered by a global flood.
lawilson200 4 years ago 2
maybe you should see the entire 5 dvd set befor you talk too much. it is indead world wide. and factualy provable.
ninnzbinnz 4 years ago
In my 20 years working as a geologist, I have yet to see a single piece evidence that supports the conclusion that the world was once covered by a flood, a few thousand years ago. It is highly unlikely that watching another 5 series DVD will change my mind.
lawilson200 4 years ago 2
mr geologist. maybe a verticaly fossilised whale in what aparently took mil or bil years to form. yet a whale carcase is fully disintergrated in less then a month? what about an iron pot found in coal rock layer dated 300mil years old? eorsion vs uplift we should all be covered by water and no fossil record present?
ninnzbinnz 4 years ago
Answers:
Misreprentation. Calcium Carbonate. You will need to clarify the last, what are you talking about
lawilson200 4 years ago 2
erosion rate vs suposed uplift rate. erosion is much faster. if the fossil record on top of mnt everest is mill or bil years old then erosion would have wubed it all out. but the mountin suposedly keeps lifting slowly. that maybe, but the erosion is faster and no fossil record should be there at all
ninnzbinnz 4 years ago