Hardware Accelerated Encryption Performance with McAfee Endpoint Encryption

[djlarson2]

Yep. That's me in this video. We didn't have the necessary hardware to isolate a single variable, so we had to settle for showing an "old platform vs. new platform" demo. Sorry internet. Please forgive us for this most heinous transgression.

[kheszi]

this is retarded, are you trying to show me the increased performance of AES-NI or the SSD...................?

[Usurper84]

wtfamiwatching.jpg

[Xigmatek]

I wonder Why It always gets Slower and slower as it copies. ?

Great Intel Stuff!

[crimsoncoin]

2Gb that quickly so wheres is this accelerator

[Xigmatek]

@EnigmaticSG

Why? Intel Bought McAfee, So it's Easy to say this is Real.

[davidsfc9]

yeah, the ssd is gonna win anyway, how impressive

[johnchen0213]

all we want is mcafee vs no mcafee.. not ssd vs hdd... its totally not fair

[benjojo12]

Thats not a fair test.

A SSD is going to win all the time against a HDD



[patcorndoggy]

OMFG, A SSD beat a HD how fucking surprising... SSD costs 4x more. Facepalm

[cowboy219]

snake oil.

[Windows446]

Fuck intel, I'm going AMD

[eyreland]

====== what's so unclear about it? [...]. So in the end they are just a new step in evolution. ====== In the 286, 386, 486, Pentium days there was a clear family tree. These days not so much. -- SSE + other instruction set add ins have confused the picture. -- Laptop vs PC specific chips have added confusion. -- Virtual and Stepping modes don't help -- 64 bit modes and instructions are variable too. -- AMD?!? As far as tracing the x86 lineage, as related state machines -- I am in the dark.

[pedro380085]

Hehe, the guy said at LEAST 2X AND SOMETIMES 3X. Looking to the transfer speed, I saw 50 in the lowest PC and 75 in the fastest... I think he made a mistake...

[waycoolzing]

Totally bollicks comparison. If you were testing mcaffee encryption what was the use in swapping out the hd for the ssd

[davidsfc9]

@waycoolzing to make it look faster

[eyreland]

Interesting, but as a tech person the role of the i7 Cores and their instructions is still a mystery to me.

Where does the i7 Core fit into the x86 chip history?

Since the Pentium, the tree lineage of Intel CPUs has become totally unclear.

Wikipedia, usually a useful guide here is totally useless.

Buying a product where its historical origins are unclear is a gamble.

[bascompany14]

@eyreland what's so unclear about it? core i7,i5 and i3 are just successors of core 2 quad and core 2 duo. they just have a more (power) efficient design and support up to SSE4.2 and selected models support AES instructionsets. Core i(X) is still based on the x86 architecture with x64 implementations. So in the end they are just a new step in evolution.

[Cheejyg]

by installing McAfee Endpoint Encryption u can get this "hardware accelerated performance??"

[killeez40]

That shit is Ownage