I'm a men and I know that Roger is for many womans so sexy...But here is video with his magic and everebody says something in the support like GENIUS or something and then you come and say:Gaah,he's so sexy...HAHAHAHA,LEGEND!:D
nadal y federer no son del mismo tiempo, fed es mayor, y ademas esto no solo se trata de logros ni estadisticas, se trata del tenis, roger es un jugador fuera de serie, con un talento unico, y aunque pierda, el seguira teniendo esa magia que nadal nunca tendra aunque rompa sus records, fed es un jugador que inspirara a las nuevas generaciones, porque se que ellos no buscaran ganar mas grand slams, ya que eso parece mas facil,mas bien buscaran igualar la tecnica de este regalo que dios nos dio!
Nadal uses to beat Federer because he have an impressive mental strenght and a huge power. but you just have to see the variety and beauty of Federer's shots, and talking about it, there is no precursor in history, don't you agree?
@israrthefirst same generation yes but different ages. federer is quite alot older than nadal and has gone past his peak.. i doubt nadal will reach 16 grans slams with djokavic and federer even still contending for grand slams.
confrontation means nothing. some players like to play players with a specific style.
federer's game is based on technique because he takes the ball early and has a one handed backhand. so topspin is efficient against him, & many of their matches were on clay
federer has trouble against defensive players (ex : murray, nadal, simon, canas and andreev caused him trouble). but he can win where nadal would've lost (federer is good against del potro, soderling, davydenko, roddick...)
this is the stuff..nadal is a great player, but is like a progress to the sport, really fast and hitting like an animal...i'm pretty sure there will be others like him in the next generations of tennis, but roger on the other hand is the artistic type, you just got to love him ! i don't think we'll see a player like him too soon.. LOVE RF!
I love Fed, but I honesty think he should retire if he doesn't win another major soon. It's kinda sad to see your idol fade away. You want to go out at the top, not at the bottom.
@disneylover160 False. First of all, Federer did beat both Sampras and Agassi more than once. And you say that all the players are in a lower league. If that's true than Nadal's had it pretty easy, also, hasn't he? He's only had difficulty with Federer who is now almost 30 years old. Federer played people who were in their prime. Plus, Nadal's main strategy is returning every point he receives. Do you really think he'll be capable of being that aggressive at 29 years? No. He's done soon.
@Pkruuse Estamos viendo un video de Federer, el numero uno de TODOS los tiempos, porque nombrar Marcelo Rios, que primero, no tiene nada que ver con este video, y Segundo no tiene ni la mas minima comparacion con el Emperador Roger Federer. Yo no defiendo a los tenistas argentinos, ni tampoco me interesan, no soy tan patriota como la mayoria de los argentinos, o como la mayoria de los chilenos, el patriotismo cuando no tiene sustento me da asco como, en esos dos casos...
@soloquierosignearme ke hablas de patriotismo chavalote? estamos viendo tenis y el numero 1 mirate las listas rafael nadal claramente el mejor y los años ke le kedan aun por conseguir titulos omg! asi ke shh
@RondadorNocturno92 ah si "chavalote"? jaja pues me parece que Nadal no le queda mucho mas tiempo de Nº1, me parece que djokovic no va a tardar en sacarle ese puesto por el ritmo que viene, pero Federer aguanto sus 5 años como numero uno, veremos si nadal consigue superarlo en logros, porque está clarisimo que en calidad de juego no lo ha superado ni podrá tampoco...
@soloquierosignearme loool no me voy a meter kn federer porke para mi es dios, yo aprecio el tenis en general y a todos los tenistas ke acen buen tenis,y a nadal no le ace falta calidad....solo kn su derecha a ganado todo lo ke un tenista puede ganar y mas! aparte ke los duelos entre nadal y federer la estadistica favorece a nadal ...y por cierto nadal sigue siendo el numero 1 bye bye djokovic
@RondadorNocturno92 federer es un jugador con tecnica de dios, todos sus tiros los hace con un movimiento de manera natural, no he visto ni creo que llegue a ver a alguien que haga eso, para mi es el mejor de la historia. hoy por hoy nadal es mejor, pero el estilo y la técnica de roger permanecerán por la eternidad como lo mejor que dió el tenis.
Federer is not the greatest player in history because he won 16 grandslams but he won 16 grandslams because he's the greatest player ever.
You see what I mean? Stop saying "Nadal is better bacause fed hadnt 8 grandslams at 24" because I don't care, I don't support Federer because of his titles. He's a genius, that's it.
@69wiwi69 rafa isn't shit and wont last to 27. If he is still playing ATP at 27, he's going to be playing challengers or satellites. There's no way he can keep playing that physical game.
@r0baa so what does that mean? nadal has typically the good game to beat federer. murray too, for example but that's not important. federer is better than nadal against players like del potro, djokovic... confrontation isn't as important as it seems
but what i wanted to say is that i like federer because he's a genius, i don't care about results.
nadal may dominate tennis now, and i recognize it, but he'll never have federer's genius
@r0baa doesn't mean much if Nadal gets whipped badly on his own surface by players that federer beat on his least favorite surface. Nadal maybe can be the best player of all time but only time will tell, and time is running out for him; the young guns are coming up like Tomic, Raonic, Dimitrov etc. Fed already has the crown and apparently he is going to be around to gain a couple more slams to put some insurance on it. Let's see if Nadal's physically demanding game can keep up until fed's age!
@69wiwi69 I agree with you man. I guess Michael Chang is the greatest because no one won a grandslam at age 17, youngest person. Eventhough I love Michael, but Federer is the greatest of all time, there is a reason why tennis experts say he is. He is the closest person to completing the game of tennis, winning almost every award out there.
@69wiwi69 nowadays Nadal has exactly the same GS at 25 as Federer had when he was 25, 10. Federer won his 11th with 25 indeed. If Nadal doesn't win US OPEN and AUS OPEN, he will be 26 by the end of RG and won't break that record. Federer must be not only the most talented player of all time, but the greatest and most successful one. I'm from Spain and watching tennis here is hell, here Nadal is a god and Federer is crap. What is tennis in Spain? Endless forehand rallies form the baseline.
@69wiwi69 the fact is, that when roger and raffa were on the top, there was no serious competition, no quality players like you have now, Novak and Andy for example, but i do agree that Roger has the best tehniques in the game,movement and streching the ball, he is the best at that, but his peak in this game has passed, dont you think? He is still among the best but not the best.
I agree with you. I said I loved roger because of his talent/technique/elegance, and that I didn't care about who is or was the best. and it's true that in federer's era, there were'nt players as regular as djoko and andy (although for me the highest tennis i've ever seen was fed/safin AO 05 and many of fed/nalbandian ).
his peak has passed, that's true too, although I still hope for a comeback ( I don't think he'll reach no1 again, but he'll perhaps win one or two other slams ).
@TheBig1dea haha i agree dude. after a while the shots federer makes come natural. doesnt suprise me as much as it did the first time i watched his perfect beautiful game.
That's Roger Federer's style. He hasn't changed anything. He just always follows the ball and not the court. I'm surprised that they find that shot hard for Roger lol
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
thats what m asking you faggot to do...anyways , that what you fag do...suck dick...and i heard its your family tradition...your mom, your sis, you , all of you do for living...keep sucking fag..!!
roger is the greates of ALL TIME! He has 15 Slams!! and he will probably have 20 when he is done.
And Rafa even though he is great he is maybe second or third of all time when it comes to lefties! even though rafa might have the head to head advantage it does not matter. Go Roger!
You guys really have no idea do you. Federer is the best grass and hard court player in the world and 2nd best clay court player in the world. Rafa beats him on clay. Overall Federer is better, he's the best player of all time for god sake, the amount of grandslam finals he's been in is ridiculous, nadal has nothing on him and never will.
He can't beat everyone all the time, in fact Federer is probably one his way out but he is the greatest player ever, no one has ever been as good as him when he is at his best.
i am sick of fuckers pointing out the head to head record of Rafa and Fed...common...
its 13-7 in Rafa's favour...right.... but if you leave the Clay court, its roger leading rafa....So, who is better???... roger is better in Grass court, hard court and rafa in clay....
SO, ALL RAFA fan, who is better??...Do i have to say more??
and u know what..if rafa reaches as many finals in Hard court or grass court as Roger reaches in clay, the head to head record will be in Roger's favour.u know m right.
Yeh last year a doctor got arrested for distributing illegal doping substances to tour de france cyclists. When they searched his house they found a list which had the names of all the cyclists who who used them on it. There were a couple more athletes on there including Rafael Nadal. Unfortunetaly they could not prove he had used any substances. But then again there are so many things you cant test for.
Nadal beat Fed at Wimbledon which is Fed's preferred surface. He also beat Fed at the Australian Open which made Fed cry. 2 straight wins on something other than clay. And you got no proof to those allegations.
wow you fucking idiot. Beating Federer once on grass does not make Nadal the better player. Or have you forgotten the two times Federer crushed him in 2006 and 2007 ON GRASS? As for hard courts, just how many US open titles has Nadal won? NONE.
Nadal will beat Federer if they played at the FO. Wimbledon is too close to call. US open Federer would win, no doubt. However Federer does really suffer mentally against Nadal anywhere really.
@Sonic2710, Federer didn't crush Nadal at Wimbledon in 2006. Nadal could have won the 2nd set and would have gone 2-1 up on Federer. You're a moron to think Federer crushed Nadal at Wimbledon 07.
Clown. Maybe you have been too busy talking shit but guys like Hewitt and Roddick are still beating guys from this generation.
As for Nadal, well. Djokovic was the only person who beat him more than once i believe. Now his game has just been found out.
People will act like Nadal was his best in 2008 but did anyone see the field? Murray with 0 slams, 1 MS title and a US runner up was considered the 4th best active player. What a joke.
@BloodMagex Nice fantasy world you live in. No one beat the living shit out of Nadal. He is king. He just beat Federer in altitude to return the favor. Nadal just destroyed Soderling who beat Federer. hahahaha
@BloodMagex Fucking idiot. Nadal owned your boy when he felt 100%. Fed can only beat Nadal when he is hurting. Proven once again by this year. Who owned who in 2010? hahahahahahahah
@mavsfan1000 Holy fuck, do you not learn from your mistakes? That was the worst counter-argument I've ever seen someone pull out of their ass. Fanboy.
nyaoooooo
deanilk 2 months ago
cheater
fedelise 3 months ago
Nope not surprised one bit :)
SKpivot 4 months ago
federer--->incredible!! :D
opferbauer111 5 months ago
@israrthefirst federer has a winning record against nadal on grass actually (2-1, all on wimbledon finals)
moedelonge 5 months ago
Easy for him
vivalavirgendelpalom 5 months ago
aimbot
cushion7991 5 months ago 12
who's the guy in blue?
kavehasi 5 months ago
@kavehasi suzuki
wingra10 5 months ago
I'm a men and I know that Roger is for many womans so sexy...But here is video with his magic and everebody says something in the support like GENIUS or something and then you come and say:Gaah,he's so sexy...HAHAHAHA,LEGEND!:D
blazilipius 5 months ago
Gaah, he's so sexy.
SmileOfSunnyGold 5 months ago
@israrthefirst way the go smart ass why dont you try winning the grand slams ^__^
828paopao 6 months ago
nadal y federer no son del mismo tiempo, fed es mayor, y ademas esto no solo se trata de logros ni estadisticas, se trata del tenis, roger es un jugador fuera de serie, con un talento unico, y aunque pierda, el seguira teniendo esa magia que nadal nunca tendra aunque rompa sus records, fed es un jugador que inspirara a las nuevas generaciones, porque se que ellos no buscaran ganar mas grand slams, ya que eso parece mas facil,mas bien buscaran igualar la tecnica de este regalo que dios nos dio!
LilitaEsperanza07 6 months ago
Nadal uses to beat Federer because he have an impressive mental strenght and a huge power. but you just have to see the variety and beauty of Federer's shots, and talking about it, there is no precursor in history, don't you agree?
2912luca 6 months ago
u cant do these things to ur opponents man its unreal fedex is d bst
afsaldurranihotmail 6 months ago
@israrthefirst same generation yes but different ages. federer is quite alot older than nadal and has gone past his peak.. i doubt nadal will reach 16 grans slams with djokavic and federer even still contending for grand slams.
kazdaman01 6 months ago 2
@israrthefirst
confrontation means nothing. some players like to play players with a specific style.
federer's game is based on technique because he takes the ball early and has a one handed backhand. so topspin is efficient against him, & many of their matches were on clay
federer has trouble against defensive players (ex : murray, nadal, simon, canas and andreev caused him trouble). but he can win where nadal would've lost (federer is good against del potro, soderling, davydenko, roddick...)
69wiwi69 6 months ago
this is the stuff..nadal is a great player, but is like a progress to the sport, really fast and hitting like an animal...i'm pretty sure there will be others like him in the next generations of tennis, but roger on the other hand is the artistic type, you just got to love him ! i don't think we'll see a player like him too soon.. LOVE RF!
bejgu7 6 months ago 5
@bejgu7 I agree , it takes a long time to create such a tennis classic like him..just remarkably elegant in every motion ...
828paopao 6 months ago
I love Fed, but I honesty think he should retire if he doesn't win another major soon. It's kinda sad to see your idol fade away. You want to go out at the top, not at the bottom.
Agnotio 6 months ago
Comment removed
Agnotio 6 months ago
NOOOO....FUCK YOU
gulfrazthehunk1 6 months ago
Ronaldinho!
MoheyMojito 6 months ago
@MoheyMojito
??????
MJTheKing95 6 months ago
I am bored of Federer. Doing the same old shit day in day out { sarcasm }
charmingdevil84 6 months ago
ahh 2006 good times.
c3vzn 6 months ago
Nadal sux
298Tony 7 months ago 3
noooooo GET OUTTA HERE!!! =))
rogerfedererfan98 7 months ago
noooooooooo get outta here!
xELxSOBREVIVIENTEx 7 months ago
federer shows class
nadal shows he gets a wedgie every 20-30 seconds a day.
NEMZOOO 7 months ago 18
NOOOOOOOOO GET OUT OF HERE
GoatKilledMe 7 months ago
Wow!
Look at the fantastic foot work!
Krayon66 7 months ago
one name 'Nadal'
PredatorIZsik 7 months ago
"No Look Shot," because he was looking at the ball, just like every other shot any tennis player has ever made.
kizbo 7 months ago
omg.. FANTASTIC TECHNIQUE!!!!
Vamptrebless 7 months ago
Federer only is so good because the other players are so bad.
If Federer had played in the era of Sampras he would have never been number one.
PornobrillenAli 7 months ago
@PornobrillenAli Stupidest. Comment. Ever.
disneylover160 7 months ago
@disneylover160 couldn't say it better
bymicromize 7 months ago
@disneylover160
The only player that is in the same league as Federer is Nadal.
All other players are in a lower league.
And Nadal is much better than Federer.
Only because Nadal is injured a lot Federer could be number one.
PornobrillenAli 7 months ago
@PornobrillenAli Nadal got to number one because federer was declining in the first place.
Stylaz21 7 months ago
@disneylover160 False. First of all, Federer did beat both Sampras and Agassi more than once. And you say that all the players are in a lower league. If that's true than Nadal's had it pretty easy, also, hasn't he? He's only had difficulty with Federer who is now almost 30 years old. Federer played people who were in their prime. Plus, Nadal's main strategy is returning every point he receives. Do you really think he'll be capable of being that aggressive at 29 years? No. He's done soon.
disneylover160 7 months ago
Federer has changed the game forever. No-one will ever reach his standard again - not within my lifetime anyway.
rosswilliams921 8 months ago
0:22
NOOOO!
StudStudent 8 months ago
Comment removed
StudStudent 8 months ago
nooooooooooooooooooo, get outta heeere. :3
ThatAsianWhoRushes 9 months ago
fake!
MellmothSebastian 9 months ago
noooooo!!! get out of here!!! lol
Paul24480588 10 months ago 2
Naaaawooo!
NewBoyzVEVO 10 months ago
Marcelo "Chino" Rios, has got a better shot...
Find "360 freak shot" on Youtube.
Pkruuse 10 months ago
@Pkruuse Shuut the f*ck up, and try to don't pronounce again the name of the worst number 1 of all time, thanks...
soloquierosignearme 9 months ago
@soloquierosignearme Argentino asqueroso, sus tenista valen hongo
Pkruuse 9 months ago
@Pkruuse Estamos viendo un video de Federer, el numero uno de TODOS los tiempos, porque nombrar Marcelo Rios, que primero, no tiene nada que ver con este video, y Segundo no tiene ni la mas minima comparacion con el Emperador Roger Federer. Yo no defiendo a los tenistas argentinos, ni tampoco me interesan, no soy tan patriota como la mayoria de los argentinos, o como la mayoria de los chilenos, el patriotismo cuando no tiene sustento me da asco como, en esos dos casos...
soloquierosignearme 9 months ago
@soloquierosignearme ke hablas de patriotismo chavalote? estamos viendo tenis y el numero 1 mirate las listas rafael nadal claramente el mejor y los años ke le kedan aun por conseguir titulos omg! asi ke shh
RondadorNocturno92 8 months ago
@RondadorNocturno92 ah si "chavalote"? jaja pues me parece que Nadal no le queda mucho mas tiempo de Nº1, me parece que djokovic no va a tardar en sacarle ese puesto por el ritmo que viene, pero Federer aguanto sus 5 años como numero uno, veremos si nadal consigue superarlo en logros, porque está clarisimo que en calidad de juego no lo ha superado ni podrá tampoco...
soloquierosignearme 8 months ago
@soloquierosignearme loool no me voy a meter kn federer porke para mi es dios, yo aprecio el tenis en general y a todos los tenistas ke acen buen tenis,y a nadal no le ace falta calidad....solo kn su derecha a ganado todo lo ke un tenista puede ganar y mas! aparte ke los duelos entre nadal y federer la estadistica favorece a nadal ...y por cierto nadal sigue siendo el numero 1 bye bye djokovic
RondadorNocturno92 8 months ago
@RondadorNocturno92 federer es un jugador con tecnica de dios, todos sus tiros los hace con un movimiento de manera natural, no he visto ni creo que llegue a ver a alguien que haga eso, para mi es el mejor de la historia. hoy por hoy nadal es mejor, pero el estilo y la técnica de roger permanecerán por la eternidad como lo mejor que dió el tenis.
alejandrocano1992 8 months ago
nahhhhoooooo hahahaa
MrDirtySweed 11 months ago
"nahhooo, get out of here!" rofl at that quote :D
willowcompany 11 months ago
group noooo at 00:21 hahahaha
ddods14 1 year ago
ONLY FEDERER CAN DO THAT! OH GOSH HE IS GENIUS!
jinkailai 1 year ago 2
who is he
alexchou9 1 year ago
33 ppl dont know anything about tennis or are federer haters
rolf85 1 year ago
Nobody is better RF
StefanR10 1 year ago
This is still my favorite outfit of Fed's, I love the matching blue shirt and shoes.
This match with Suzuki was a classic, tons of highlites.
retox 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
youtube.com/watch?v=cAZgZckQH1c&feature=related
This is the best no look shot
jimtoide 1 year ago
Comment removed
jimtoide 1 year ago
@xelagnay10 dunlop
emran90 1 year ago
HAHA commentators xD in chorus: Noooh!
MediaMooify 1 year ago 3
looking is overrated...
rjnrf 1 year ago 8
0:11 he knew what he had to do, he was charging his raquet!
popizanetti 1 year ago 2
i always feel bad after making one of those shots XD
Monsiemage 1 year ago
O_O WHAT?!!?! Ball + speed > Roger Federer?!
boboboomboom 1 year ago
203
JillAnderson 1 year ago
suck mada boy!!!
babyboylarry 1 year ago
nooooooooooo get outta here lol
fucker1029 1 year ago
all you can do is laugh....best thing to happen to tennis ever.
cupcakechagrin 1 year ago
Comment removed
misterlonely1446 1 year ago
0:21
dubbersubber 1 year ago
fed said "hop off my sack home skillet"
tzane94 1 year ago
i love how at the end all the announcers can do is laugh :p....i know thats all i was doing when i saw that hahah
TheIKrushalot 1 year ago
Federer is not the greatest player in history because he won 16 grandslams but he won 16 grandslams because he's the greatest player ever.
You see what I mean? Stop saying "Nadal is better bacause fed hadnt 8 grandslams at 24" because I don't care, I don't support Federer because of his titles. He's a genius, that's it.
This is a delight to watch
69wiwi69 1 year ago 153
@69wiwi69 rafa isn't shit and wont last to 27. If he is still playing ATP at 27, he's going to be playing challengers or satellites. There's no way he can keep playing that physical game.
Deph11s 1 year ago
@Deph11s knowing rafa he'll probably make adjustments to get to 27 besides it not lik he doesnt kno wat his game is doing to him
Lonehawk2k4 1 year ago
@69wiwi69
Actually, Feder DID have 8 titles at 24...
TrolloftheTube 1 year ago
@69wiwi69 17-8 Nadal.
r0baa 7 months ago
@r0baa so what does that mean? nadal has typically the good game to beat federer. murray too, for example but that's not important. federer is better than nadal against players like del potro, djokovic... confrontation isn't as important as it seems
but what i wanted to say is that i like federer because he's a genius, i don't care about results.
nadal may dominate tennis now, and i recognize it, but he'll never have federer's genius
69wiwi69 7 months ago
@r0baa doesn't mean much if Nadal gets whipped badly on his own surface by players that federer beat on his least favorite surface. Nadal maybe can be the best player of all time but only time will tell, and time is running out for him; the young guns are coming up like Tomic, Raonic, Dimitrov etc. Fed already has the crown and apparently he is going to be around to gain a couple more slams to put some insurance on it. Let's see if Nadal's physically demanding game can keep up until fed's age!
kinsmon123 7 months ago
@kinsmon123 couple more slams? hahahaha
Nadal has the condition to play his game style
Maybe Dimitrov and Tomic yes , but still. Tsonga can also be dangerous.
r0baa 7 months ago
@69wiwi69 I agree with you man. I guess Michael Chang is the greatest because no one won a grandslam at age 17, youngest person. Eventhough I love Michael, but Federer is the greatest of all time, there is a reason why tennis experts say he is. He is the closest person to completing the game of tennis, winning almost every award out there.
quachingducks 6 months ago
@69wiwi69 furthermore is a very humble person!!
chowdhary1992 6 months ago
@69wiwi69 nowadays Nadal has exactly the same GS at 25 as Federer had when he was 25, 10. Federer won his 11th with 25 indeed. If Nadal doesn't win US OPEN and AUS OPEN, he will be 26 by the end of RG and won't break that record. Federer must be not only the most talented player of all time, but the greatest and most successful one. I'm from Spain and watching tennis here is hell, here Nadal is a god and Federer is crap. What is tennis in Spain? Endless forehand rallies form the baseline.
aleoferdie 6 months ago
@69wiwi69 Well said. I love both Roger and Rafa. Even Rafa says that he is the "greatest ever".
Mopzboy 3 months ago
@69wiwi69 the fact is, that when roger and raffa were on the top, there was no serious competition, no quality players like you have now, Novak and Andy for example, but i do agree that Roger has the best tehniques in the game,movement and streching the ball, he is the best at that, but his peak in this game has passed, dont you think? He is still among the best but not the best.
stubistine 3 months ago
@stubistine
I agree with you. I said I loved roger because of his talent/technique/elegance, and that I didn't care about who is or was the best. and it's true that in federer's era, there were'nt players as regular as djoko and andy (although for me the highest tennis i've ever seen was fed/safin AO 05 and many of fed/nalbandian ).
his peak has passed, that's true too, although I still hope for a comeback ( I don't think he'll reach no1 again, but he'll perhaps win one or two other slams ).
69wiwi69 3 months ago
naoooooohhhhhwwww ;)
ichsageuchwas 1 year ago 72
not even a smile
alpha2dog 1 year ago
oooooooooooooo
OlyMp241 1 year ago
Noooo, get outa here
Bballah323 1 year ago
The beauty of that flick shot.. I wish they had the slow-motion of that like they have nowadays!
Elwink 1 year ago
hewitts better
jackmiley 1 year ago
That 's not a no look. It was still amazing though.
jyy82993 2 years ago
Clever-handed control shot.
biyorkman 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
That is Roger Federer! The number 1!
rodrigofalcaolopesde 2 years ago
BRILLIANT!!!! He is amazing!
looloorex 2 years ago
nothing federer does surprises me any more.
TheBig1dea 2 years ago 264
except when he loses. and that's not hater-speak.
people only expect perfection from Federer that when he loses they're like, "jeeze! he totally sucks now!"
even though he's still better than 98% of the field...on a bad day.
go RF!!
squeedum 2 years ago 16
@TheBig1dea
lol! ya!
AJ18555 1 year ago
@TheBig1dea haha i agree dude. after a while the shots federer makes come natural. doesnt suprise me as much as it did the first time i watched his perfect beautiful game.
KinghtHunter 1 year ago
lol, he was looking at the ball, not where it was going. simple shot my arse.
AceGuitarR7 2 years ago 2
i love the "no"
zzyzybynsky 2 years ago 9
dude Federer makes shots that seriously make me laugh... they just seem impossible... Federer rocks...
danabe12 2 years ago 7
I remember watching this match, it's still one of my favs of all time of the Great One.
retox 2 years ago
definitely
reefric 2 years ago
but he got to ball pretty fast though and roger does make shot´s like this, look easy..
reefric 2 years ago
i feel sorry for this guy.. seems like every fed highlight vid he is getting owned
fungamesss 2 years ago 7
Nooooo lol
XxmynameboratxX 2 years ago
dont try this at home
capel11111 2 years ago 139
@capel11111 try it at the tennis courts xD
LeafVillItachi 1 year ago
@capel11111 do it somewhere else.
GiaSekand0 1 year ago
@capel11111 nope but try this on court :)
pedralicamosa 9 months ago
woah
UBAmandaFan2 2 years ago
danm
he is inhumanly good! and he's gorgeous too of course :P
MrsRichardArmitage 2 years ago 5
That's Roger Federer's style. He hasn't changed anything. He just always follows the ball and not the court. I'm surprised that they find that shot hard for Roger lol
Legolas8811 2 years ago 3
Not true.
He never follows the ball *immediately* nowadays as he did previously.
EternalChaos000 2 years ago
You're not supposed to look up from a shot until the swing's finished anyway. What he did was standard.
TakeshiMomoshiro 2 years ago
i think he means that federer was not facing the court, which means he had to figure out where to place the ball without looking there.
ikazooka 2 years ago 3
hack! kick roger please.. hes a hacker
Ch0colat3C0okiEs 2 years ago 6
hahahahahahah
fede567 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
well your mom sucked my dick 90211 times =)
imnew2 2 years ago
Its ok Roger, you can at least smile for a great shot and we will still love you
korg440 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats what m asking you faggot to do...anyways , that what you fag do...suck dick...and i heard its your family tradition...your mom, your sis, you , all of you do for living...keep sucking fag..!!
suckmydick90210 2 years ago
no thanks
1cooldude11 2 years ago
Forget about the 15th grand slams forget about all the records ... Its shots like that make him the GREATEST PLAYER OF ALL TIME !!
napleee 2 years ago 5
true but a trophy or two wouldn't hurt to recognize the talent
RustyShakofurd 2 years ago 2
roger is the greates of ALL TIME! He has 15 Slams!! and he will probably have 20 when he is done.
And Rafa even though he is great he is maybe second or third of all time when it comes to lefties! even though rafa might have the head to head advantage it does not matter. Go Roger!
ScarBaboonEnterprise 2 years ago
You guys really have no idea do you. Federer is the best grass and hard court player in the world and 2nd best clay court player in the world. Rafa beats him on clay. Overall Federer is better, he's the best player of all time for god sake, the amount of grandslam finals he's been in is ridiculous, nadal has nothing on him and never will.
Darkchris999 2 years ago 6
How come Tsonga just beat him then?
Ranks don't mean everything
msane4XX 2 years ago
Very, very true.
TheWadeChannel 2 years ago
What means most is Slam wins.
Nirky 2 years ago
He can't beat everyone all the time, in fact Federer is probably one his way out but he is the greatest player ever, no one has ever been as good as him when he is at his best.
Darkchris999 2 years ago 15
Marat Safin beat Federer when he was in his prime back in 05 at the Australia Open, so I disagree with that statement. lol
wizardrac 2 years ago
i am sick of fuckers pointing out the head to head record of Rafa and Fed...common...
its 13-7 in Rafa's favour...right.... but if you leave the Clay court, its roger leading rafa....So, who is better???... roger is better in Grass court, hard court and rafa in clay....
SO, ALL RAFA fan, who is better??...Do i have to say more??
and u know what..if rafa reaches as many finals in Hard court or grass court as Roger reaches in clay, the head to head record will be in Roger's favour.u know m right.
suckmydick90210 2 years ago 4
I agree, but Nadal did beat him in Wimbledon, I dont know what happened to him this year.
Acoontey 2 years ago
knee injury, because all he can do is grind
R3cruited 2 years ago
Nadal beat him ONCE on grass, I don't know why Rafa fans keep pressing on it. Remember, Federer beat him TWICE in Wimbledon.
Sonic2710 1 year ago 2
that was homo
ftwatheist 2 years ago
i mean federer.
yusei999 2 years ago
sometimes i cant believe what roger freder does.
yusei999 2 years ago
Comment removed
napleee 2 years ago
Yeh last year a doctor got arrested for distributing illegal doping substances to tour de france cyclists. When they searched his house they found a list which had the names of all the cyclists who who used them on it. There were a couple more athletes on there including Rafael Nadal. Unfortunetaly they could not prove he had used any substances. But then again there are so many things you cant test for.
sebah1991 2 years ago
You wish. Nadal is clean. Vamos!
mavsfan1000 2 years ago
federer is the best of all time, better than nadal.
ForzaMilan28 2 years ago 5
Federer 15 majors
Nadal: 6 majors
enough said
sebah1991 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nadal 6 Fed 2. Enough said. ;)
mavsfan1000 2 years ago
Well now that we are into it, first of all prob 4 or 5 of those were on sand, which is nadals preferred surface. Also nadal takes drugs
sebah1991 2 years ago
Nadal beat Fed at Wimbledon which is Fed's preferred surface. He also beat Fed at the Australian Open which made Fed cry. 2 straight wins on something other than clay. And you got no proof to those allegations.
mavsfan1000 2 years ago
wow you fucking idiot. Beating Federer once on grass does not make Nadal the better player. Or have you forgotten the two times Federer crushed him in 2006 and 2007 ON GRASS? As for hard courts, just how many US open titles has Nadal won? NONE.
Sonic2710 1 year ago 2
@Sonic2710 I bet you the next time Nadal plays Fed in a slam, Nadal will win. I got a 75% chance of being right based on history. Vamos!
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
And guess what? I bet you the next time Nadal plays Fed, Federer will crush him, 80%. And it's based on CURRENT RESULTS AND CONDITIONS. VAMOS!
Sonic2710 1 year ago
@Sonic2710 I'll take that bet. Nadal owns Federer. :D
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
Nadal will beat Federer if they played at the FO. Wimbledon is too close to call. US open Federer would win, no doubt. However Federer does really suffer mentally against Nadal anywhere really.
@Sonic2710, Federer didn't crush Nadal at Wimbledon in 2006. Nadal could have won the 2nd set and would have gone 2-1 up on Federer. You're a moron to think Federer crushed Nadal at Wimbledon 07.
Anaconda43VR 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000
Yea, Nadal can beat anybody, when hes on roids. Like he was.
Juddenmar 1 year ago
@Juddenmar lol Nadal haters will do anything to discredit his success and ownage of Federer.
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000
Fed and Nadal belong to different generations. Fed is past his prime and Nadal is entering his prime. 04-07 Fed would defeat 08 Nadal.
Nadals challenge will come when he is 28 and we will see how he competes against the 22 year olds.
pmo1983 1 year ago
@pmo1983 Nadal 08 owned everyone. Destroyed Fed at the French Open and almost straight setted Fed at Wimbledon. lol Fed is a joke.
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000
"owned everyone"
and yet he only won two slams. at Fed peak he was winning three a year.
Fed is past his prime and is still the best player in the world.
pmo1983 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000
Fed is the sole survivor of his generation. (safin, hewitt, Coria, ferrerro, haas, nalbandian, roddick etc)
Nadals generation is djoko, murray, delpo, cilic, tsonga etc.
They are not the same age. there primes did not coincide.
Answer honestly. Do you believe when Nadal is 28 that he will be regularly beating 22 year olds????
pmo1983 1 year ago
Clown. Maybe you have been too busy talking shit but guys like Hewitt and Roddick are still beating guys from this generation.
As for Nadal, well. Djokovic was the only person who beat him more than once i believe. Now his game has just been found out.
People will act like Nadal was his best in 2008 but did anyone see the field? Murray with 0 slams, 1 MS title and a US runner up was considered the 4th best active player. What a joke.
Anaconda43VR 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000
And you sir, 'mavsfan' (my apologies for that).are quite, quite stupid.
zorch77 1 year ago
@zorch77 Can't handle the truth I see. It's only Nadal's knee that is keeping him from dominating the tour again like 2008. Vamos sucker.
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000 Yea, then he beat the living shit out of Nadal. Rematch successful, end of story, goodbye.
BloodMagex 1 year ago
@BloodMagex Nice fantasy world you live in. No one beat the living shit out of Nadal. He is king. He just beat Federer in altitude to return the favor. Nadal just destroyed Soderling who beat Federer. hahahaha
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000 It's not fantasy if it happened. Hahahaha! Dumb fanboy.
BloodMagex 1 year ago
@BloodMagex Fucking idiot. Nadal owned your boy when he felt 100%. Fed can only beat Nadal when he is hurting. Proven once again by this year. Who owned who in 2010? hahahahahahahah
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000 Who's got the most championships? hahahahahahaha, see how retarded you sound? Again more fanboy talk.
BloodMagex 1 year ago
@BloodMagex Who is 5 years younger? Your Fed boy is done. hahahahaha
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@mavsfan1000 Holy fuck, do you not learn from your mistakes? That was the worst counter-argument I've ever seen someone pull out of their ass. Fanboy.
BloodMagex 1 year ago
@BloodMagex How many championships did Fed have 24? GTFO.
mavsfan1000 1 year ago