Nanotechnology Video

[Matrix29bear]

Now, if the dot elements were flattened to look like calculator battery, the rotation factor would not be as problematic and it would also allow more room for display + sensor + memory elements. Intra-element communication could be optimized via basic Internet node communication protocols and DNS optimizations. The biggest logical problem of course is the power supply concealment and maintaining stored power density.

[Matrix29bear]

Anyone else having problems with YOUTUBE's screwy-ass auto-comment refiltering, comment updating, and screwy CAPTCHA coding?

[Matrix29bear]

With the ball-chain net design, the other big problem would be power supply distribution.

Supplying power using the standard model requires powering up the ends of the net and letting it flow to the other side. This would not be ideal as power failure of elements there equals the instant death of the hardware. Ideally, the power would be supplied as a weak AC power flow to the entire net from top to bottom with internalized micro-capacitors per ball-dot element. Making link failures moot.

[Matrix29bear]

With a ball-chain net design (think beaded car seat cover), unlike fibers, the individual dot elements would rotate freely without unraveling. Individual dots would transmit their information over the linkages. The downside of this design would be that since the elements rotate freely, maintaining proper viewing angles would be difficult. Upside is that the individual ball dots can be extended to sausage shape links (think ball-chain connector) allowing internal circuitry between the ball dots.

[Matrix29bear]

As for the actual connectors for the flexible circuits (current design is pitiful), the best design is the BEADED PULL CHAIN (GOOGLE[ Ball chain] )design scaled down to nano-circuit range. Each dot in the pull-chain can hold a computation/display element on the outside, while the nature of the pull-chain linkage allows extreme flexation & rotation without circuit breaks. The polymer coating would just retain the ball-chain sheet in a waterproof touch-friendly interface.

[Matrix29bear]

Big problem I see, is that if power supplies (not barring micro-nuclear plutonium dots) are that small, the entire computer OS needs to be designed around continual random node power failure (distributed duplicate computing cross-checking with continual saving of current power states). Solar is good for tiny immediate power demand in daytime street lighting, but bad for long term power demands.

[simjee88t]

where is the processor , battery and transceiver in this?

[1mashoman]

THAT HAS NO USE UNTIL IS USED FOR HUMANS GOOD...

[nightmarereaperz]

and yet we still havent gotten cars to fly...

[rummykhan]

@nightmarereaperz salute to your thought love you....

[ZebbMassiv]

@nightmarereaperz Yes we have. We just haven't found smart enough people to fly them.

[akingtomi]

@nightmarereaperz there called planes...

[nightmarereaperz]

@akingtomi wow. are u really that stupid. firstly, its they are called planes/their called planes. get yr grammer right. and secondly how does a flying car be compared to a plane. not in size, money, speed, or anything. a flying car is suppose to be a car, just that it can fly, not some fucking huge expensive plane which is not even for personal use.

[akingtomi]

@nightmarereaperz If you're going to be a grammer nazi please make sure you then spell every word and use all your grammer correctly including capitals before you comment on mine, ok thanks. Also lets make a list of how they're the same: Can fly Over priced Have to travel fast to be practical Run on fuel Get you from A to B Carry passengers Also anyone can drive, not anyone can fly so no flying cars are impractical. Private jets exist A flying car would be expensive.

[AdvantageLanguage]

I guess most incredible technologies are sooner or later turned into military applications (even if the original technology still has practical civilian uses)... eg. Robotics & cyborg technology used to create drones and unmanned weapons; Nanotechnology will of course be used in a way not too dissimilar to THE BORG on Star Trek... "Resistance is Futile" !!... Automatic doors, tablet computers, voice recognition, even transporter technology... you saw it first on Star Trek !...

[AdvantageLanguage]

See Youtube video:

"Real Star Trek Science Today with Physicist Michio Kaku and Deepak Chopra on SIRIUS XM"

[audiopan242]

DEUS EX

[biscuit147]

For the guys below, we don't need to see them with the eye. We can still manipulate atoms one by one and see them digitally with AFM (atomic force microscopy).

[n00dle1337]

what are the name of the songs?

[lukeairblaster]

@n00dle1337 The first is "My Name Is Lincoln" from The Island by Steve Jablonsky, but I don't know the second song :(

[ShanVLOGS]

1:20 We've done it boys (Y)

1:25 Wait NO! What is this?!

* referring to music* (for the ones who don't get this..)

[ultimateavetar]

Considering the fact we dont even have the Technology to see an atom I doubt this will happen anytime soon :-(

[Chinoman10]

@ultimateavetar errr... you on drugs?

[DarkPretorian]

@Chinoman10 No his actually right, we don't. Or more accurately it's physically impossible. The size of atoms are smaller then the visible spectrum we use to 'see' things with. We can however use a smaller wavelength light to scan them, that's not really seeing its just a digital representation of electromagnetic waves that sensors pick up which is something we have done for some time now.

[Chinoman10]

@DarkPretorian Yea... But that's more than enough in the context of this video... In order to "get" this technology, we don't "need to see" the atoms themselves... Oh and by the way, I don't want to be annoying, but you got a typo in your text...

[AdvantageLanguage]

I'd like to buy a letter....ummmm.... H for Henrietta please..... hmmmm... I think I'd like to solve it now... is it, "Yeah" ?

[Chinoman10]

@AdvantageLanguage I don't get your comment...? I mean, I don't understand what ya mean?...

[AdvantageLanguage]

@Chinoman10 .... Which comment don't you understand ? The, "I'd like to buy a letter" comment was a WHEEL OF FORTUNE reference... Someone, (perhaps you?) wrote "Yea" instead of "Yeah" in a comment insulting another YouTuber's poor spelling. So I thought it necessary to dish out some sarcasm... Or was it my Star Trek comment you didn't understand ? I was simply showing that slot of technology from Star Trek has come to fruition. Nano Technology features on Star Trek.

[AdvantageLanguage]

@AdvantageLanguage ... don't be confused... "showing that ALOT of technology"... damn auto correct prefers "SLOT" !!

[Chinoman10]

@AdvantageLanguage It was the buy a letter one lol... Anyways, who said Yea is supposed to be typed Yeah and not Yea?

[HenryHins]

you have shown lots of pics and vids which don't relate to Nano-tech

[TheArkTek]

Deus Ex is not just Science Fiction

[DiDCarlos]

CUE THE INSPIRATIONAL MUSIC

[flyffvshalo]

Can someone tell me the name of this song please

[Ryzawing]

@flyffvshalo The 2nd one is Akkadian Empre by Audiomachine. I need to know the 3rd one though D:

[GrizzlyFist]

Welcome to the Grid... I wonder how this technology will be used in the future, the way we are headed i got a pretty clear picture. It Search the term " trans-humanism" . also look at my profile

[jonne12345]

cybernet is gonna be one badass enemy

[Twisted86]

2:34....well that was big brothers idea.

[baratas]

epic

[md9751]

Journeyman was not kidding..no wonder he mentioned nano tech computers in the future..

[Zaxxen69]

stupid. 

[Dissonant1975]

Possibilities endless..

[Myck1912]

this soundtrack is very cool, how's it called?

[IRockUtube101]

@Myck1912 "my name is lincoln" by steve jablonsky

[DurexDurpaneu2]

Come to papa mmmmmmm the future is beautiful

[MrNaras1]

cool