Good damn.Maybe start compare 911 to panamera that will be sense becouse that is the same brand.No to BMW whitch have diffrent cars concept.I suppose that we never do a perfect comparison Which car ar better then other becouse somethimes it's just impossible.BMW has its pluses and minuses and Porsche the same.That's my opinion in this case.However i prefer BMW.
too much to tell, I use all the torque to pull construction trailers. With my tuner on level 2 (Out of 4) and a trailer on, it runs like a stock diesel without a trailer. I was told to put it on level 4 I would need an even heavier duty transmission (Current one is an Allison which is used in M1A1 tank.) and I would have to strengthen the frame otherwise it would blow out the gears and twist the frame.
Anyone else notice the full racing cage in the GT3? Plus an extra passenger = almost 2 extra ppl in the Porsche... Cameraman should have been in the M3 to even things out.
First this is an old gt3, very old; second thecamera man is in the porsche => 2 passengers, and third the m3 is tuned a lot so this isn' t a real race, it' s a joke
@rodolphekisso M3 is stock. The main reason the M3 won is the DCT, as opposed to the Stick shift in the GT3. Also, it's a 996 GT3, not a 997 which would probably dominate the M3.
@200208195 Really? I have a 2004 Chevy Duramax, and trust me an ECU tuner for mine boosted it by about 100-250 horsepower depending on what level I put it on. Then again I have never done an ECU job to a street car.
@BFtagRETRIBUTION Is that a turbo diesel? ECU tunes on N/A petrol cars generally get about 40hp Maximum. On turbo petrols, i've heard of 90hp gains. Turbo Diesels get phenominal gains. 150hp is not uncommon.
@200208195 Oops, that's probably why then. Yes, it's the 6.6 litre Duramax engine (turbocharged) so thats why it has the substantial gain. Nevermind about the ECU thing then, I stand corrected by you sir.
That's not even the latest GT3... and this is pretty much BMW's top of the line car at the moment. I think a 997 GT3 would nab that M3. AND beat it on the track as well.
BMW and Mercedes are not as hardcore as Porsche, Ferarri & Lambourghini are. BMW and Mercs are a balance between performance and luxury.
Porsche's are made for the track.
For a road course performance obviously a car with higher bhp would win. Results can differ when the start from standstill but then again, it is not a good idea to drag such expensive cars from zero as it can damage the transmission if pushed to hard. Personally i'll take M3 anyday over GT3.
if you look at the price tag in both cars. i rather go with the cheaper car M3. porsche is just another volkswagen bug with a rich price tag that has horsepower.
no doubt porsche is superior, its made for this purpose alone....but BMW M3 is a different beast altogether and really shouldnt be compared to bmw m3...M3 kinda stands alone in its own cool world with its own cool history and I really dont think it tries to compete with porsche..besides it should compete with the 911 or something not gt2 rs or whatever those are supercars M3 is not a super car its just an awesome car.
@Rambo89E34 when this video was made this Porsche GT3 Mk1 was almost 10 years older and GT3 have no turbos. Not bad for the Porsche! I had a GT3 Mk2 which is faster than Mk1, whish to see that race!?! But this is in the past right now cause tomorrow I'm picking up my brand new M3 DTC. It isn't important because BMW M3 is different animal anyway! This will be my 5th M3 and i love it!
I love porsches and BMW's but porsches are not made for straight line acceleration. No surprise to see it loose. Maybe a RS could do it. But thats the only hope for a N/A f6 vs a N/A V8
and im pretty sure the can compare to porsche cuase you can seei nthis video that the porsche got its ass kicked and im saying porsche is bad car just saying it got its ass kick right here
@drf22 lol I really dont care some guys think i am a noob here, but can you show me in youtube movies what u mean? like, What is the profesional way to drive your car.
@Qexon Vorever !!! wird mit v geschrieben !!!! BMW Borkum Motoren werke forever meinst du wohl , ps das video issn leichter fake auf den vollidioten wie du auch noch reinfallen !!!! du glaubst doch nich das ein m3 der sich von einem audi s3 bei youtube überholen lässt auch nur minimal chancen gegen einen GT3 hat !!! man leute wie du sind eine schande für unser land !!! Hahahahhahahahaha schau mal bugatti vs m3 .... ich glaub der m3 gewinnt weil er ein bmw iss ......... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :.-D
@issabmw the 996 GT3 runs a 7:43 while the E92 M3 runs a 8:05 around the ring, 20sec is a HUGE difference, so yes the porsche DESTROYS the M3 on the track
Although the numbers are set, and on paper the Porsche has a 20 second advantage, the Bimmer is an M3, meaning the Motorsports version of an ENTRY level vehicle, which needs to be compensated for even if it destroys the M3; the reality cannot be dismissed. Stating that it will destroy it is an ignorant statement implying the Porsches superiority in every manner, yet with simple mods, the M3 will be closer than you think.
@issabmw 20 sec on a track is a HUGE difference, the M3 is a great car but NOWHERE near the porsche in terms of performance, the porsche is not an entry level car that was made fast, it is a car that was designed to be ran around a track from the factory, the 996 being a car that is even more track ready with modifications from porsche that cost significantly extra, the M3 is in a totally different class, and i wouldnt expect it to keep up, but yes the porsche WILL destroy the M3 on a track
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 you idiot. like for like M model BMWS are as quick, if not quicker than its equal porsche around a track. Where do you get you information?
@dalesteel lol no you couldnt be more wrong, the M3 is faster around a track and handles better than the M5, the M5 was in no way made to compete with any porsche it was made the be a gran tourer NOT a track car, also the M3 is also a compromise between daily driver and track car, where the Porsche is specifically made for the track, look up the times the M3 is NOWHERE close to the track model porsches, BMW are great cars all around but on the track they are nothing compared to porsche
not only is the M3 faster than the M5 like i stated, but the porsches are faster than them all, the M5 is a boat and the ONLY time its performance shines is against other boats the fact that someone would say an M get even come close to any track model porsche show how very little they know about cars, and even less about performance cars
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 you complete dickhead. Thats the next generation M3 vs this generation M5. Wait for next generation M5 and also you comparing not the standard 911. GT model are built for out and out racing. Light weight no radios there basically a racing car. what type of idiot r u. Why not compare BMW M5 Hurricane if your comparing it to light weight/tuned versions. You made yourself look a prick there mate.
@dalesteel you could not be more wrong again, 1st the prosche in this video is not a base model it is a 996 2nd the track models are not striped down you can order them without a radio but they still have a super nice interior, in most cases with navi and everything, 3rd next generation? what is that? the E60 M5 was made from 05-10 the E92 M3 was made from 08-today, and last the 996/997/gt3 are all factory built by porsche not an aftermarket company so that would hardly be a logical comparison
@dalesteel porsche just builds better performance cars end of story, they dont need some company to tune and modify their cars to make them fast they can do it themselves, bmws are great cars even great performers, but nowhere the performance of porsche, by even saying that they are close you are proving how very little you know, if youve ever spent any time at a real track you would see that it takes a well modified bmw to keep up with STOCK track model porsches
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 all i know is my 4 door family saloon car, which i can carry my family in (comfortably) my shopping in, etc beats nearly every 911 going on the motorway. That my friend is a FACT!
@dalesteel that would be a mostly straight race then also there are very few track models around because i can promise that a track model would also embarrass you in a straight line unless youre modified, also they are probably either older models or base models because even the S model is going to be faster than a M5 straight line or track and that is a fact
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 wow your so stupid. you really know nothing. Most 911 drivers wouldn't dare race an M5 because they know what its capable of. The more I talk to you the more I think you have never even owned a 911 because you would understand. M5 does 180MPH in 6th gear and 205 in 7th. 0-60 porsche 911 s and turbos are quicker yes, but when were rolling at 100mph+ only the turbo will keep pace and to be honest after 180mph that will have had enough.
@dalesteel so you are still saying the M5 will only beat low end porsches and only in a straight line, i agree with that, but no porsche owner would be scared of your unmodified land yacht on a track, top speed is about the least important spec a car holds, but thats all the M5 has so i guess youre still lacking a good argument for bmw
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 you are joking. I am sayin the M5 will lap quicker than a 911 and prob 911 s. Turbo and GT3's will win M5 yea. On the motorway the M5 will eat 911, 911 s and GT3... 911 Turbo will hold up dont get me wrong, with the right driver 911 turbo will be quicker. All this is true, you might not like to admit it but you have to. As for an argument for BMW? Do i really have to, Its a 4 door family saloon which on a track beats 90% of 911's on the road. and 99% of 911's ON the road.
@dalesteel you are wrong again, i have given you specs and times and you have just stated incorrect facts and opinions, identical 0-60 times, but one car is a land yacht the other is a light agile car made for the track, and the porsche track models would leave the M5 so far back it wouldnt even be in the rear view (good driver or not), the only advantage to the M5 would be its high speed acceleration (partially due to its 7th gear)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 7th gear. nothing to do with the awesome 5.0 L V10 507BHP (with no turbos!!!!) poor porsche as to chuck turbos to there engine to get performance, from there supposedly super car. Do lambo or ferrari do that? NO because they are true super cars. Porsche is impractical and no better or quicker than M5 or RS6 which are practical everyday cars. Porsche for posers thats it. There shit. End of.!
@dalesteel1st from an engineering standpoint turbo is the most efficient way to make power (not NA not SC), 2nd the next M5 is going to be twin turbo, the fastest cars in the world are forced induction because NA is extremely inefficient porsches are most certainly supercars unlike the M5 they have the quality and materials as well as performance they are not for posers they are for people who want real performance and not a grocery getter thats what the cheyenne is for
@dalesteel my comments dont make any sense? (by the way its spelled sense not sence dumbass) my comments have #s and facts yours are all opinions and insults
@dalesteel the whole turbo argument is pathetic, the GT3 RS has a 3.8L that makes 450hp NA, that puts BMWs NA numbers to shame, and the GT2 RS has a 3.6L TT that makes 620hp, those are #s BMW is FAR from achieving, BMW makes good cars but in the world of racing Porsche has been doing it and winning longer, they make better performance cars period there really is no arguing that
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 are you joking.... look back at BMW's motorsport history with touring cars its phenomenal. You know nothing! what have porsche ever done in a race series? They have a one make 911 series and thats it. I dont think porsche have even been in Formula 1. You really make yourself look more stupid everytime you make a comment. BMW M have never made a turbo charged engine, but if specualtion is correct this will be a 4.4 twin turbo, lets say it will easily surpass any 911 on the road.
@dalesteel actually porsche holds the title of the most sucessful brand in motorsport with over 28,000 wins (most belonging to the 911), also the largest race car manufacturer, the new M5 will likely be behind the Porsche again, BMWs times are nowhere close to the realm of porsches, please if you refuse to bring facts and numbers to the table, than stop with the opinions and insults, you clearly know next to nothing about performance cars which explains why you bought an M5 and not an RS6
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 haha you get better. your now saying a 'audi'!!! RS6 is better than an m5? and your talking about drivers cars (handling wise). I think i have heard enough! porsche may have 28,000 wins look at all the 1 make series it runs, it cant loose!!!! you bloody idiot. Why not look how many wins renault have had with there 1 make series i bet thats about 20,000!!!! FOOL P.S when the e60 M5 came out, it was quicker than any 911 available.The same will happen again. BMW=engineering bliss
@dalesteel those are not included those are 28,000 wins in there racing history far eclipsing anything BMW will likely ever achieve, also the E60 M5 was released in 2005 and ran an 8:13, 1991 964_8:08, 1995 993 GT2_8:09, 1997 993 ran a 8:12, 2004 997_7:59, 1999 996 GT3_7:56, anymore incorrect facts you have to spew? these are all cars that are older (some almost 15 years older) and still have faster times, like ive been saying when it comes to performance Porsche is years ahead of BMW
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 the RS6 is a few years newer than the e60 M5 arsehole. Oh and by the way.... What engines in the RS6.... a 5.0L V10 TWIN TURBO and it only manages 60BHPmore than BMW's 5.0 V10 normaly aspirated. That engine is a joke, just like you. 911's for pozers... BMW m5 for drivers. Ultimate Driving Machine!
@dalesteel 507hp/385ftlbs M5, 571hp/481ftlbs Rs6 its not just about hp, torque is just as important, not only does the RS6 have 60+hp but its got almost 100ftlbs on the M5, it is a faster better car that only came out a few years after the M5, so again anyone who says a porsche is for a poser but a M5 is the ultimate driving machine could not be more wrong, the M5 is a land yacht made for fun weekend drives, the porsche is a track car that was civilized just enough to be comfortable on the road
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@mikethebeast1012 the 911 wants to be a supercar but simply just isn't and it gets caught up in arguments about its credentials against m5 and rs6 saloon cars for that reason. Its not a supercar. Its not better in performance than m5 or rs6 in the real world. If i want a track car ill by a works btcc touring car for £40k and rape a 911 all over. Understand? By the way the RS6 is obviously going to have alot of torque it has 2 turbos!! Do you know anything about engines? Turbos provide torque!
@dalesteel i never said the rs6 didnt have turbos, again you clearly show how little you know, the 911 GT2 has run faster times around the ring faster than the enzo it is most certainly a supercar, the m5 is a land yacht, but if you wanted a fast land yacht you should have bought an RS6 instead but again it just shows how little you know of cars
@mikethebeast1012 RS6 isnt as dominant as the M5 even though it has More HP. Best Performance saloon has always been the M5 since 1980s . but the RS6 is pretty nice though
@dalesteel 911 wont beat an M5 or M6 around a road course? When did that happen? Fan boy much kid? The Porche Panemera is faster than the lil M5 and M6 and beats them around the track. The CTS-V does as well. Not too mention the fact that BMW under rates their engine's outputs. You think an E92 M3 making 414bHP but dynos more than a C6 LS3 corvette is making 414hp? NO, I don't think so.
@dalesteel right. What do you drive again? An M5? NO. An M6? NO. An M3? NO. A corolla? oh yes. No, actually I'd put you more into the the pick up truck aspiring to someday become an E46 M3 owner.
@carl206rc why would i wanna search for shit about porsche. I think there a rip off for something that is no better or quicker than an everyday saloon car like an M5. RS6 or AMG 6.3 E-Class.
@dalesteel again lets just look at the times 997 GT2 7:18, M5 8:13, the porsche is almost a full minute faster, not only that the M5 gets beat by porsches that are almost 20yrs old how can you even still compare the 2 cars?
@mikethebeast1012 i agree with that, but compare the price with those cars. You almost get 3x m3 e92 for 1 porsche gt3 rs, not to talk about the gt2 rs.
i'm not saying that porsche sucks - my dream car is the 997 Turbo S MK II PDK :)
@Bmw545m sure they cost more but the performance is nowhere near eachother, the M3 is great in its class but that is a TOTALLY different class than any porsche
@mikethebeast1012 and to contrast that the old r32 skyline with 40k of mods into it will spank any porche. seen it happen. and before you complain about modification the porches were strpped out worth over 300k
@Bravehear71992 again you are talking about modified cars the R32 skyline is mediocre at best in stock form, the M3 and ANY 911 model is a car that can go from the dealership to the track and perform very well
though i don't disagree in general, how do you explain the 2001 M3 GTR which porsche had banned? given a larger budget, bmw could easily match porsche. the difference you seem to be missing is that bmw makes reasonably priced performance cars, porsche makes uncompromised performance cars. you're comparing bmw cars to cars that cost twice as much or more and which also have a specific design intention...all out performance.
@reddevil7nine Porsche banned? in what way, Porsche doesnt write any road laws or racing rules the M3 GTR shouldnt even be mentioned because its extremely limited production and high cost, it was in no way a production car compared to the porsches it raced against that were, BMW is a great company and all but they are nowhere near the performance level Porsche is at
@mikethebeast1012 im sure if bmw was gonna sell a car for $150,000 they could easily get 600+ hp
the M3 is only like $60,000
and if youre gonna compare the likes of the M5 M6 ad M3 to cars like the GT3 GT2 AND GT2 RS, youre out of your mind, those are all stripped out light weight track cars
dont get me wrong, i LOVE Porsche. but the comparison you are making doest make any sense
@mikethebeast1012 im sure if bmw was gonna sell a car for $150,000 they could easily get 600+ hp
the M3 is only like $60,000
and if youre gonna compare the likes of the M5 M6 ad M3 to cars like the GT3 GT2 AND GT2 RS, youre out of your mind, those are all stripped out light weight track cars
dont get me wrong, i LOVE Porsche. but the comparison you are making doesnt make any sense
@mikethebeast1012 BMW dont wants to make cars for the racetrack, porsche wants to. Bmw just builds comfortable cars which you can also use on the track to have some fun. You need to recognice, that the M is a heavy 5 seats car and a porsche is a 2 seats car + the GT´s are made for the track, not for an highway.
So these 2 are absolutely different cars and if you see it from this point, 8:05 min. is a very good track time.
@mikethebeast1012 lol I think BMW are over rated. but I agree that the M5 should only be comapred to other boats but it IS pretty quick for a boat lol although the new TT V8 M5 for 2011 will be something interesting. Might possibly give the CTS-V a run for its money. Although Car and Driver stated they will cost around a 100k... thats quite a big price bump.
@psmTARDCORE i wouldnt say BMW are overrated, but they are a luxury car with good performance, where as porsche is a sports car with luxury, bmw can NEVER compare with porsche and to say thay can is extremely ignorant
@mikethebeast1012 dude the m series is stil a great car and the m3 is made for complete different use then the m5 or m6 and so is the porsche so you cant compare them
@MrElijah420 i agree that they are totally different (i have said it in multiple comments), i also like BMW, however whether or not they are made for different purpose Porsche is a much bigger name when it comes to performance, that is all i was saying, again Porsches that are old (some 20yrs even) still hold faster laptimes than current BMW m models
@mikethebeast1012 you're comparing a full option m3 vs a stripped porsche, don't get me wrong i love porsches but you don't show the full facts here.... how about the m3 csl vs 996 gt3 on Nordschleife??? that's a fair comparision... csl: 7.50 / gt3: 7.54....
@taviones who said it was stripped? the GT3 doesnt necessarily come stripped they can come with all the normal features or can be had stripped, whereas the CSL is always stripped and a very uncomfortable car to drive anywhere off the track. also i think the more comparable time would be the GT3 RS which runs a 7.43
@atbecstasy11 the only problem with the car is it costs WELL over $100k and it is completely stripped out. for that price you could easily have a Porsche that is not stripped and performs just as well if not better. there really is no argument for BMW here, when it comes to performance no one can out do Porsche
@Bravehear71992 really since when? only nissans drivers can post a decent time (the actual time posted by 3rd party drivers is 30sec slower in M3 territory), also even the GTR doesnt come near the GT2RS, and last when you buy a car for $80k thinking its a bargain think again that tranny was made for a sentra, drive it hard and all those fancy computers will tell the dealer, so when it breaks (and it will, its been happening like crazy) the dealer wont fix it and will charge you $27k for a new 1
@mikethebeast1012 That is so wrong the feel of any ///M car is great they are great handling car plus most of the time they hold 4+ and still keep up with as i say it supercars. They are fast, great handling, great family cars and great to look at thats a silly comment to put because can a porsche GT3 rs hold 4+ people. NO and also your comparing it to a family car of course a racing pred porsche is gonna be faster because its been pred for racing!!!
@madmarv4n what does it matter how many people the car can hold? and what world do you live in where a stock M can keep up with supercars? like ive said they are good cars but BMW is nowhere near the level of performance Porsche is at. if you require a car that carries 4+ people and is supercar fast perhaps you should consider a Panamera but no fully loaded M car can do that
@mikethebeast1012 If you want to compare porsche and bmw on the track you should take the m3 Csl and the new m3 gts as examples. its more fare. But I agree with you. porsche makes the best track cars.
@mattemattee very well compare the GTS which costs about as much as a 911 Turbo, except the 911 doesnt require the weight reduction the M3 does giving you a better performing more luxurious car, the CSL is stripped of everything that makes it a nice car (even A/C), again Porsche doesnt need to ruin a perfectly good car to achieve that level of performance, however if you choose you can give those up and have an even faster car but you wont pay extra for less stuff like the BMW
Knowing that the M3 costs 50% less than the Porsche and it is a 4 seater vs a 2 seater. M3 Wins. Only on a race track cornering and braking are in Porsche better.....
Had an e46 M3 sold it, to slow, Bought a R34 GTR that goes twice as hard. You see what you dont understand is BMW-M Built cars around family cars. The Skyline GTR was build from a Race Car not from a 4door family car like BMW's. BMW has a rich history for building great cars, but not performance cars. The Skyline GTR its History is Beyond RIch its Legenary for thoes into racing. But who are you know your only 20. Can really talk either im only 21
@Intendente88 my friend bought a R34 in Japan, built it with HKS 2.8L kit, that sucks. over 700 HP on the wheels, R35 is a nice car, but can't be upgraded like R34.
@Intendente88 Not true, the normal version of the Skyline is a family saloon car. Four doors, space for 5 people. The standard engine in a R34 Skyline only produces 155bhp which isn't sporty at all. The car you are talking about is a masterpiece with a twin-turbo charged 332bhp 6L engine (280 bhp listed). These cars are awesome I agree, but they are not built up from a sportscar from the beginning. Even not when you are talking about the very first Skyline. That was a four-door saloon car.
M3 E92 DKG DCT has 7 Speeds DualClutch Gearbox ^^
ahmedcsl 2 weeks ago
@m5boarddotcom could you please make a video of the G-Power M3 SKIII sporty drive? i´d really love to see that. 720hp M3 my absolute dream car
deutschessoftair 1 month ago
Good damn.Maybe start compare 911 to panamera that will be sense becouse that is the same brand.No to BMW whitch have diffrent cars concept.I suppose that we never do a perfect comparison Which car ar better then other becouse somethimes it's just impossible.BMW has its pluses and minuses and Porsche the same.That's my opinion in this case.However i prefer BMW.
KubaWarsaw87 3 months ago
Put both on track & we'll see what shit is the E92
Truwarier4 4 months ago
Mixing Swedish and English is just a waste of people's time.
Otherwise very interesting as always.
Though I think Subaru kicks all BMW's ;) butts!
popeyepanther 4 months ago
too much to tell, I use all the torque to pull construction trailers. With my tuner on level 2 (Out of 4) and a trailer on, it runs like a stock diesel without a trailer. I was told to put it on level 4 I would need an even heavier duty transmission (Current one is an Allison which is used in M1A1 tank.) and I would have to strengthen the frame otherwise it would blow out the gears and twist the frame.
BFtagRETRIBUTION 5 months ago
That porsche got fucken owned. BMW FTW!
CPalermo900 6 months ago
this porsche is old ;) (996) generation
MrCosmin94 7 months ago
Anyone else notice the full racing cage in the GT3? Plus an extra passenger = almost 2 extra ppl in the Porsche... Cameraman should have been in the M3 to even things out.
andy993 7 months ago
@andy993 there are two guys in the bmw
portugalmen 7 months ago
First this is an old gt3, very old; second thecamera man is in the porsche => 2 passengers, and third the m3 is tuned a lot so this isn' t a real race, it' s a joke
rodolphekisso 8 months ago
@rodolphekisso M3 is stock. The main reason the M3 won is the DCT, as opposed to the Stick shift in the GT3. Also, it's a 996 GT3, not a 997 which would probably dominate the M3.
200208195 6 months ago
@200208195 Sorry to burst your bubble but look at 0:16 of the video, that M/// has an ECU tuner and aftermarket exhaus system, the Porsche is stock.
BFtagRETRIBUTION 5 months ago
@BFtagRETRIBUTION I'll be damned - I didn't see that :S
Still, ECU and exhaust doesn't qualify as "a lot" to me :P
200208195 5 months ago
@200208195 Really? I have a 2004 Chevy Duramax, and trust me an ECU tuner for mine boosted it by about 100-250 horsepower depending on what level I put it on. Then again I have never done an ECU job to a street car.
BFtagRETRIBUTION 5 months ago
@BFtagRETRIBUTION Is that a turbo diesel? ECU tunes on N/A petrol cars generally get about 40hp Maximum. On turbo petrols, i've heard of 90hp gains. Turbo Diesels get phenominal gains. 150hp is not uncommon.
200208195 5 months ago
@200208195 Oops, that's probably why then. Yes, it's the 6.6 litre Duramax engine (turbocharged) so thats why it has the substantial gain. Nevermind about the ECU thing then, I stand corrected by you sir.
BFtagRETRIBUTION 5 months ago
@BFtagRETRIBUTION That's one substantial engine! I can't even begin to imagine how much torque you're now spurting out :O
200208195 5 months ago
its decided. im gonna get an m3
toiletscrubbr 8 months ago
M///POWER
MrDadada2424 8 months ago
straightline racing = redneck.
l2onniel 9 months ago
wave bye bye porsche
isthisforreal04 9 months ago
///M porsche killer !
a car than u can use all day with 4 confortable seats , big trunk , easy to enter
and still can kill those porsche gt ment for racetrack hahaha
bimmeracing 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bimmeracing in your dreams maybe.....
Turboo911 6 months ago
The GTS is no way as expensive as the 911 turbo. Read the pricelist.......
A turbo with a little extra costs 1,5 mil swedish kr (sek).
and a porsche costs around one mil swedish kr (sek) A Porsche is more expensive than all bmw, except 7-serie, x5m, x6m.
mattemattee 10 months ago
M///POWER.
But strange.....
MrDadada2424 11 months ago
how did he many to lose in a gt3? they musta chipped the hell out of that m3
stoneeh 11 months ago
The M3 is half the price of the GT3. Stop comparing apples to orange.
chbrules 11 months ago
That's not even the latest GT3... and this is pretty much BMW's top of the line car at the moment. I think a 997 GT3 would nab that M3. AND beat it on the track as well.
dirtracercole7 11 months ago
BMW and Mercedes are not as hardcore as Porsche, Ferarri & Lambourghini are. BMW and Mercs are a balance between performance and luxury.
Porsche's are made for the track.
For a road course performance obviously a car with higher bhp would win. Results can differ when the start from standstill but then again, it is not a good idea to drag such expensive cars from zero as it can damage the transmission if pushed to hard. Personally i'll take M3 anyday over GT3.
That's my personal choice.
kinjat56 11 months ago
You are retarded ! Porsches are fucking go karts!
yashar4626 11 months ago
ładnie go odpierdolił.
AAALKOPOLIGAMIA 1 year ago
if you look at the price tag in both cars. i rather go with the cheaper car M3. porsche is just another volkswagen bug with a rich price tag that has horsepower.
C0NT3NDER 1 year ago
Comment removed
C0NT3NDER 1 year ago
no doubt porsche is superior, its made for this purpose alone....but BMW M3 is a different beast altogether and really shouldnt be compared to bmw m3...M3 kinda stands alone in its own cool world with its own cool history and I really dont think it tries to compete with porsche..besides it should compete with the 911 or something not gt2 rs or whatever those are supercars M3 is not a super car its just an awesome car.
JOEblowable 1 year ago
Bmw 4-ever
TheBanger555 1 year ago
you will all be sorry when the m3 gets a factory turbo.
Rambo89E34 1 year ago 6
@Rambo89E34 M3 has never been, and hopefully never will be, fitted with a turbo.
Bravehear71992 1 year ago
@Rambo89E34 when this video was made this Porsche GT3 Mk1 was almost 10 years older and GT3 have no turbos. Not bad for the Porsche! I had a GT3 Mk2 which is faster than Mk1, whish to see that race!?! But this is in the past right now cause tomorrow I'm picking up my brand new M3 DTC. It isn't important because BMW M3 is different animal anyway! This will be my 5th M3 and i love it!
pietkun007 2 weeks ago
bmw power!
ruffryd123 1 year ago 3
Watch a Corvette Roast all of these.
TheSavageB 1 year ago
@TheSavageB redneck alert
Bravehear71992 1 year ago
Porsches are better on racetrack, but for everyday use BMW is better
HyperbolicSine 1 year ago
bmw m3 > porsche
Marckito305 1 year ago
@walkabout09 Oh please!.
mattyoz0 1 year ago
the best looking, the most fun, the fastest in a straight line, the ///M3
MrBazpoker 1 year ago
I love porsches and BMW's but porsches are not made for straight line acceleration. No surprise to see it loose. Maybe a RS could do it. But thats the only hope for a N/A f6 vs a N/A V8
MangoSmoothie16 1 year ago 2
@MangoSmoothie16 It's an old 996 GT3. New one would win.
mattyoz0 1 year ago
@mattyoz0 ah. i didnt notice. But then yes a new one probably could
MangoSmoothie16 1 year ago
and im pretty sure the can compare to porsche cuase you can seei nthis video that the porsche got its ass kicked and im saying porsche is bad car just saying it got its ass kick right here
MrElijah420 1 year ago
Most of you guys cant drive when it comes to professional racing. Slow gear changing and amateur staging.
drf22 1 year ago
@drf22 lol I really dont care some guys think i am a noob here, but can you show me in youtube movies what u mean? like, What is the profesional way to drive your car.
GodlikeNL 1 year ago
I like this Car!
BMW Power <3
Coasterstyla98 1 year ago
BMW vorever!
Qexon 1 year ago
@Qexon Vorever !!! wird mit v geschrieben !!!! BMW Borkum Motoren werke forever meinst du wohl , ps das video issn leichter fake auf den vollidioten wie du auch noch reinfallen !!!! du glaubst doch nich das ein m3 der sich von einem audi s3 bei youtube überholen lässt auch nur minimal chancen gegen einen GT3 hat !!! man leute wie du sind eine schande für unser land !!! Hahahahhahahahaha schau mal bugatti vs m3 .... ich glaub der m3 gewinnt weil er ein bmw iss ......... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :.-D
blkassi 1 year ago
@blkassi
Ich unterhalte mich nicht mit "Primaten"
...das ist unter mein NIVEAU! ...
Qexon 1 year ago
@Qexon sieh dir mal opel calibra vs m3 an .......... sieht m3 schwer scheiße aus !!
blkassi 1 year ago
boring
sylburn22 1 year ago
the best bmw of all time is the Mclaren f1
TheBlackdragon936 1 year ago
you don't mess with the beemer.
MParseface38 1 year ago
///M Power
nawewawe 1 year ago
that s interesthing really,,bmw got modifiy something ?..if it s not,,,OMG
tbedir 1 year ago
respect for both cars
German Power
issabmw 1 year ago
The Porsche is stock, the BMW has some changes -.-
diogodiogo002 1 year ago
the Porsche still DESTROYS the M3 on the track lol
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 4
@mikethebeast1012
no it doesnt
issabmw 1 year ago
@issabmw the 996 GT3 runs a 7:43 while the E92 M3 runs a 8:05 around the ring, 20sec is a HUGE difference, so yes the porsche DESTROYS the M3 on the track
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012
Although the numbers are set, and on paper the Porsche has a 20 second advantage, the Bimmer is an M3, meaning the Motorsports version of an ENTRY level vehicle, which needs to be compensated for even if it destroys the M3; the reality cannot be dismissed. Stating that it will destroy it is an ignorant statement implying the Porsches superiority in every manner, yet with simple mods, the M3 will be closer than you think.
issabmw 1 year ago
@issabmw 20 sec on a track is a HUGE difference, the M3 is a great car but NOWHERE near the porsche in terms of performance, the porsche is not an entry level car that was made fast, it is a car that was designed to be ran around a track from the factory, the 996 being a car that is even more track ready with modifications from porsche that cost significantly extra, the M3 is in a totally different class, and i wouldnt expect it to keep up, but yes the porsche WILL destroy the M3 on a track
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 you idiot. like for like M model BMWS are as quick, if not quicker than its equal porsche around a track. Where do you get you information?
dalesteel 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 why not compare it to the M5. The M5 is what BMW made to out do porsche. Fucked now aint ya!
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel lol no you couldnt be more wrong, the M3 is faster around a track and handles better than the M5, the M5 was in no way made to compete with any porsche it was made the be a gran tourer NOT a track car, also the M3 is also a compromise between daily driver and track car, where the Porsche is specifically made for the track, look up the times the M3 is NOWHERE close to the track model porsches, BMW are great cars all around but on the track they are nothing compared to porsche
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 what. look at m5 track times vs 911 at nurbergring. bye bye 911.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel you have not made 1 correct statement, here are some track times
Porsche GT2 RS_7:18
997 GT2_7:31
996 GT3_7:54
BMW M3 E92_8:05
M6_8:08
M5 E60_8:13
not only is the M3 faster than the M5 like i stated, but the porsches are faster than them all, the M5 is a boat and the ONLY time its performance shines is against other boats the fact that someone would say an M get even come close to any track model porsche show how very little they know about cars, and even less about performance cars
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 29
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 you complete dickhead. Thats the next generation M3 vs this generation M5. Wait for next generation M5 and also you comparing not the standard 911. GT model are built for out and out racing. Light weight no radios there basically a racing car. what type of idiot r u. Why not compare BMW M5 Hurricane if your comparing it to light weight/tuned versions. You made yourself look a prick there mate.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel you could not be more wrong again, 1st the prosche in this video is not a base model it is a 996 2nd the track models are not striped down you can order them without a radio but they still have a super nice interior, in most cases with navi and everything, 3rd next generation? what is that? the E60 M5 was made from 05-10 the E92 M3 was made from 08-today, and last the 996/997/gt3 are all factory built by porsche not an aftermarket company so that would hardly be a logical comparison
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 the m3 - E90/E92. The M5 is E60 surley you understand that E90 comes after E60 meaning the 'next' generation. Its really simple.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012 stop talking shit paper boy.
TypeDoubleR 1 year ago
@dalesteel porsche just builds better performance cars end of story, they dont need some company to tune and modify their cars to make them fast they can do it themselves, bmws are great cars even great performers, but nowhere the performance of porsche, by even saying that they are close you are proving how very little you know, if youve ever spent any time at a real track you would see that it takes a well modified bmw to keep up with STOCK track model porsches
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 all i know is my 4 door family saloon car, which i can carry my family in (comfortably) my shopping in, etc beats nearly every 911 going on the motorway. That my friend is a FACT!
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel that would be a mostly straight race then also there are very few track models around because i can promise that a track model would also embarrass you in a straight line unless youre modified, also they are probably either older models or base models because even the S model is going to be faster than a M5 straight line or track and that is a fact
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 wow your so stupid. you really know nothing. Most 911 drivers wouldn't dare race an M5 because they know what its capable of. The more I talk to you the more I think you have never even owned a 911 because you would understand. M5 does 180MPH in 6th gear and 205 in 7th. 0-60 porsche 911 s and turbos are quicker yes, but when were rolling at 100mph+ only the turbo will keep pace and to be honest after 180mph that will have had enough.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel so you are still saying the M5 will only beat low end porsches and only in a straight line, i agree with that, but no porsche owner would be scared of your unmodified land yacht on a track, top speed is about the least important spec a car holds, but thats all the M5 has so i guess youre still lacking a good argument for bmw
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 you are joking. I am sayin the M5 will lap quicker than a 911 and prob 911 s. Turbo and GT3's will win M5 yea. On the motorway the M5 will eat 911, 911 s and GT3... 911 Turbo will hold up dont get me wrong, with the right driver 911 turbo will be quicker. All this is true, you might not like to admit it but you have to. As for an argument for BMW? Do i really have to, Its a 4 door family saloon which on a track beats 90% of 911's on the road. and 99% of 911's ON the road.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel you are wrong again, i have given you specs and times and you have just stated incorrect facts and opinions, identical 0-60 times, but one car is a land yacht the other is a light agile car made for the track, and the porsche track models would leave the M5 so far back it wouldnt even be in the rear view (good driver or not), the only advantage to the M5 would be its high speed acceleration (partially due to its 7th gear)
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 7th gear. nothing to do with the awesome 5.0 L V10 507BHP (with no turbos!!!!) poor porsche as to chuck turbos to there engine to get performance, from there supposedly super car. Do lambo or ferrari do that? NO because they are true super cars. Porsche is impractical and no better or quicker than M5 or RS6 which are practical everyday cars. Porsche for posers thats it. There shit. End of.!
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel1st from an engineering standpoint turbo is the most efficient way to make power (not NA not SC), 2nd the next M5 is going to be twin turbo, the fastest cars in the world are forced induction because NA is extremely inefficient porsches are most certainly supercars unlike the M5 they have the quality and materials as well as performance they are not for posers they are for people who want real performance and not a grocery getter thats what the cheyenne is for
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 your clearly a dickhead or a child as your comments are stupid and dont make sence.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel my comments dont make any sense? (by the way its spelled sense not sence dumbass) my comments have #s and facts yours are all opinions and insults
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 6
@dalesteel the whole turbo argument is pathetic, the GT3 RS has a 3.8L that makes 450hp NA, that puts BMWs NA numbers to shame, and the GT2 RS has a 3.6L TT that makes 620hp, those are #s BMW is FAR from achieving, BMW makes good cars but in the world of racing Porsche has been doing it and winning longer, they make better performance cars period there really is no arguing that
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 37
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 are you joking.... look back at BMW's motorsport history with touring cars its phenomenal. You know nothing! what have porsche ever done in a race series? They have a one make 911 series and thats it. I dont think porsche have even been in Formula 1. You really make yourself look more stupid everytime you make a comment. BMW M have never made a turbo charged engine, but if specualtion is correct this will be a 4.4 twin turbo, lets say it will easily surpass any 911 on the road.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel actually porsche holds the title of the most sucessful brand in motorsport with over 28,000 wins (most belonging to the 911), also the largest race car manufacturer, the new M5 will likely be behind the Porsche again, BMWs times are nowhere close to the realm of porsches, please if you refuse to bring facts and numbers to the table, than stop with the opinions and insults, you clearly know next to nothing about performance cars which explains why you bought an M5 and not an RS6
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 haha you get better. your now saying a 'audi'!!! RS6 is better than an m5? and your talking about drivers cars (handling wise). I think i have heard enough! porsche may have 28,000 wins look at all the 1 make series it runs, it cant loose!!!! you bloody idiot. Why not look how many wins renault have had with there 1 make series i bet thats about 20,000!!!! FOOL P.S when the e60 M5 came out, it was quicker than any 911 available.The same will happen again. BMW=engineering bliss
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel those are not included those are 28,000 wins in there racing history far eclipsing anything BMW will likely ever achieve, also the E60 M5 was released in 2005 and ran an 8:13, 1991 964_8:08, 1995 993 GT2_8:09, 1997 993 ran a 8:12, 2004 997_7:59, 1999 996 GT3_7:56, anymore incorrect facts you have to spew? these are all cars that are older (some almost 15 years older) and still have faster times, like ive been saying when it comes to performance Porsche is years ahead of BMW
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 6
@dalesteel and the RS6 Avant (station-wagon) runs a 8:09 vs the M5s pitiful 8:13
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 the RS6 is a few years newer than the e60 M5 arsehole. Oh and by the way.... What engines in the RS6.... a 5.0L V10 TWIN TURBO and it only manages 60BHPmore than BMW's 5.0 V10 normaly aspirated. That engine is a joke, just like you. 911's for pozers... BMW m5 for drivers. Ultimate Driving Machine!
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel 507hp/385ftlbs M5, 571hp/481ftlbs Rs6 its not just about hp, torque is just as important, not only does the RS6 have 60+hp but its got almost 100ftlbs on the M5, it is a faster better car that only came out a few years after the M5, so again anyone who says a porsche is for a poser but a M5 is the ultimate driving machine could not be more wrong, the M5 is a land yacht made for fun weekend drives, the porsche is a track car that was civilized just enough to be comfortable on the road
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mikethebeast1012 the 911 wants to be a supercar but simply just isn't and it gets caught up in arguments about its credentials against m5 and rs6 saloon cars for that reason. Its not a supercar. Its not better in performance than m5 or rs6 in the real world. If i want a track car ill by a works btcc touring car for £40k and rape a 911 all over. Understand? By the way the RS6 is obviously going to have alot of torque it has 2 turbos!! Do you know anything about engines? Turbos provide torque!
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel i never said the rs6 didnt have turbos, again you clearly show how little you know, the 911 GT2 has run faster times around the ring faster than the enzo it is most certainly a supercar, the m5 is a land yacht, but if you wanted a fast land yacht you should have bought an RS6 instead but again it just shows how little you know of cars
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 8
@mikethebeast1012 RS6 isnt as dominant as the M5 even though it has More HP. Best Performance saloon has always been the M5 since 1980s . but the RS6 is pretty nice though
nukeonator 3 months ago
@dalesteel 911 wont beat an M5 or M6 around a road course? When did that happen? Fan boy much kid? The Porche Panemera is faster than the lil M5 and M6 and beats them around the track. The CTS-V does as well. Not too mention the fact that BMW under rates their engine's outputs. You think an E92 M3 making 414bHP but dynos more than a C6 LS3 corvette is making 414hp? NO, I don't think so.
psmTARDCORE 1 year ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@psmTARDCORE hahahahahahaha im not even gunna bother with you, you talk more shit than the other guy
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel right. What do you drive again? An M5? NO. An M6? NO. An M3? NO. A corolla? oh yes. No, actually I'd put you more into the the pick up truck aspiring to someday become an E46 M3 owner.
psmTARDCORE 1 year ago 7
@psmTARDCORE mate av got an M5. 06 reg 35,600 miles. i dont need to brag about shit i dont have
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel no.
psmTARDCORE 1 year ago
@psmTARDCORE no what?
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel
do you know something about porsche 911?
do you know nicki lauda?
do you know what car he was driving when he was champion?
do you know what f1 car won the championship in 1984 and 1985?
do you know something about races?
search mclaren- porsche and look for some information about le mans and you will realize how stupid your comment is.
carl206rc 1 year ago 4
@carl206rc why would i wanna search for shit about porsche. I think there a rip off for something that is no better or quicker than an everyday saloon car like an M5. RS6 or AMG 6.3 E-Class.
dalesteel 1 year ago
@dalesteel again lets just look at the times 997 GT2 7:18, M5 8:13, the porsche is almost a full minute faster, not only that the M5 gets beat by porsches that are almost 20yrs old how can you even still compare the 2 cars?
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 7
@mikethebeast1012 i agree with that, but compare the price with those cars. You almost get 3x m3 e92 for 1 porsche gt3 rs, not to talk about the gt2 rs.
i'm not saying that porsche sucks - my dream car is the 997 Turbo S MK II PDK :)
Bmw545m 1 year ago
@Bmw545m sure they cost more but the performance is nowhere near eachother, the M3 is great in its class but that is a TOTALLY different class than any porsche
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 4
@mikethebeast1012 so true :)
Bmw545m 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012 and to contrast that the old r32 skyline with 40k of mods into it will spank any porche. seen it happen. and before you complain about modification the porches were strpped out worth over 300k
Bravehear71992 1 year ago
@Bravehear71992 again you are talking about modified cars the R32 skyline is mediocre at best in stock form, the M3 and ANY 911 model is a car that can go from the dealership to the track and perform very well
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012
though i don't disagree in general, how do you explain the 2001 M3 GTR which porsche had banned? given a larger budget, bmw could easily match porsche. the difference you seem to be missing is that bmw makes reasonably priced performance cars, porsche makes uncompromised performance cars. you're comparing bmw cars to cars that cost twice as much or more and which also have a specific design intention...all out performance.
reddevil7nine 11 months ago
@reddevil7nine Porsche banned? in what way, Porsche doesnt write any road laws or racing rules the M3 GTR shouldnt even be mentioned because its extremely limited production and high cost, it was in no way a production car compared to the porsches it raced against that were, BMW is a great company and all but they are nowhere near the performance level Porsche is at
mikethebeast1012 11 months ago
@mikethebeast1012 im sure if bmw was gonna sell a car for $150,000 they could easily get 600+ hp
the M3 is only like $60,000
and if youre gonna compare the likes of the M5 M6 ad M3 to cars like the GT3 GT2 AND GT2 RS, youre out of your mind, those are all stripped out light weight track cars
dont get me wrong, i LOVE Porsche. but the comparison you are making doest make any sense
ktraoui 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mikethebeast1012 im sure if bmw was gonna sell a car for $150,000 they could easily get 600+ hp
the M3 is only like $60,000
and if youre gonna compare the likes of the M5 M6 ad M3 to cars like the GT3 GT2 AND GT2 RS, youre out of your mind, those are all stripped out light weight track cars
dont get me wrong, i LOVE Porsche. but the comparison you are making doesnt make any sense
ktraoui 10 months ago
@mikethebeast1012 BMW dont wants to make cars for the racetrack, porsche wants to. Bmw just builds comfortable cars which you can also use on the track to have some fun. You need to recognice, that the M is a heavy 5 seats car and a porsche is a 2 seats car + the GT´s are made for the track, not for an highway.
So these 2 are absolutely different cars and if you see it from this point, 8:05 min. is a very good track time.
enta2k 10 months ago 2
@enta2k I agree with you absolutely.
KubaWarsaw87 3 months ago
@mikethebeast1012 i think this video argues that fact...
100089295 6 months ago
@mikethebeast1012 lol I think BMW are over rated. but I agree that the M5 should only be comapred to other boats but it IS pretty quick for a boat lol although the new TT V8 M5 for 2011 will be something interesting. Might possibly give the CTS-V a run for its money. Although Car and Driver stated they will cost around a 100k... thats quite a big price bump.
psmTARDCORE 1 year ago 4
@psmTARDCORE i wouldnt say BMW are overrated, but they are a luxury car with good performance, where as porsche is a sports car with luxury, bmw can NEVER compare with porsche and to say thay can is extremely ignorant
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 6
@mikethebeast1012 Cadillac CTS-V: 7.59
disbsam333 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012 dude the m series is stil a great car and the m3 is made for complete different use then the m5 or m6 and so is the porsche so you cant compare them
MrElijah420 1 year ago
@MrElijah420 i agree that they are totally different (i have said it in multiple comments), i also like BMW, however whether or not they are made for different purpose Porsche is a much bigger name when it comes to performance, that is all i was saying, again Porsches that are old (some 20yrs even) still hold faster laptimes than current BMW m models
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 5
@mikethebeast1012 you're comparing a full option m3 vs a stripped porsche, don't get me wrong i love porsches but you don't show the full facts here.... how about the m3 csl vs 996 gt3 on Nordschleife??? that's a fair comparision... csl: 7.50 / gt3: 7.54....
taviones 1 year ago
@taviones who said it was stripped? the GT3 doesnt necessarily come stripped they can come with all the normal features or can be had stripped, whereas the CSL is always stripped and a very uncomfortable car to drive anywhere off the track. also i think the more comparable time would be the GT3 RS which runs a 7.43
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago 3
@mikethebeast1012
but the M3 GTS was 25 second`s faster than the normal m3
atbecstasy11 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012
but the M3 GTS was 25 second`s faster than the normal m3
atbecstasy11 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012
but don't forget the M3 GTS was 25 second`s faster than the normal m3 , 1 second behind de ferarri 599 GTB
atbecstasy11 1 year ago
@atbecstasy11 the only problem with the car is it costs WELL over $100k and it is completely stripped out. for that price you could easily have a Porsche that is not stripped and performs just as well if not better. there really is no argument for BMW here, when it comes to performance no one can out do Porsche
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012 nissan
Bravehear71992 1 year ago
@Bravehear71992 really since when? only nissans drivers can post a decent time (the actual time posted by 3rd party drivers is 30sec slower in M3 territory), also even the GTR doesnt come near the GT2RS, and last when you buy a car for $80k thinking its a bargain think again that tranny was made for a sentra, drive it hard and all those fancy computers will tell the dealer, so when it breaks (and it will, its been happening like crazy) the dealer wont fix it and will charge you $27k for a new 1
mikethebeast1012 1 year ago
@mikethebeast1012 That is so wrong the feel of any ///M car is great they are great handling car plus most of the time they hold 4+ and still keep up with as i say it supercars. They are fast, great handling, great family cars and great to look at thats a silly comment to put because can a porsche GT3 rs hold 4+ people. NO and also your comparing it to a family car of course a racing pred porsche is gonna be faster because its been pred for racing!!!
madmarv4n 11 months ago
@madmarv4n what does it matter how many people the car can hold? and what world do you live in where a stock M can keep up with supercars? like ive said they are good cars but BMW is nowhere near the level of performance Porsche is at. if you require a car that carries 4+ people and is supercar fast perhaps you should consider a Panamera but no fully loaded M car can do that
mikethebeast1012 11 months ago
Comment removed
mattemattee 11 months ago
@mikethebeast1012 If you want to compare porsche and bmw on the track you should take the m3 Csl and the new m3 gts as examples. its more fare. But I agree with you. porsche makes the best track cars.
M3 gts : 7,48
M3 csl : 7,50
mattemattee 11 months ago
@mattemattee very well compare the GTS which costs about as much as a 911 Turbo, except the 911 doesnt require the weight reduction the M3 does giving you a better performing more luxurious car, the CSL is stripped of everything that makes it a nice car (even A/C), again Porsche doesnt need to ruin a perfectly good car to achieve that level of performance, however if you choose you can give those up and have an even faster car but you wont pay extra for less stuff like the BMW
mikethebeast1012 11 months ago
Knowing that the M3 costs 50% less than the Porsche and it is a 4 seater vs a 2 seater. M3 Wins. Only on a race track cornering and braking are in Porsche better.....
arebord 1 year ago
@arebord
+1. Exactly like the ZR1 vs GTR argument
issabmw 1 year ago
///M Power!
dlelemental 1 year ago
dumbass you have to compare the 997 gt3 with the M3 E92 not the 996 gt3 -.-
AlbeRennsport 1 year ago
@AlbeRennsport
agreed...
mitttube 1 year ago
yes vive bmw n1 ///M POWER :)
zellxial 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
///M POWER
zafert85 1 year ago
bmw's FTW!
killerets 1 year ago
///M POWER
neel35 1 year ago
because ///M is from Monster!
kolyCarol 1 year ago
bmw
adokenk3nnbasil 1 year ago
I have some spare factory BMW Racing parts for M3's
ScottsdaleMotorsport 1 year ago
M POWER BOTH GERMAN CARS SO BOTH GOOD
20styla08 1 year ago
M power!
Platini1945 1 year ago
wow i realy thought the gt3 would take it ,
great race !
bumpain17 1 year ago
PIck up my E90 M3 in 45 days... can't wait! ///M Power!
ibanezgod 1 year ago
bmw m3 is super fast
nabilrodas28 1 year ago
M3 is really harmful walking (=
vanosz 1 year ago
Porsche driver loses ground at every shift. Plenty of room for improvement there! What do you expect from an 11 year old car anyways?!
GT3LM 1 year ago
I expect an 11 year old car to kick ass still!
stylin60es 1 year ago
How could the BMW loose? More hp, better gearbox that allows even monkeys to shift fast :-). And i guess i would stil choose the raw GT3.
350kmh 1 year ago
HOLY SHIT... did that M3 just beat the 911 GT3??? ok i gotta watch this again!!
gevorgjaan 1 year ago
Bimmer wins :D
FreeYourMind911 1 year ago
holy shit that m3 is fast
Getfunkay 1 year ago
///M Power!!
zaxedo 1 year ago
i own an m3 (i am 20 yrs old) i have never meet someone my age who drives a 911 GT3.
porsche has a history that other car companies can never duplicate and money cant buy.
///M also has a rich history, but still falls short to that of porsches
only 'certain type' of people drive Corvette ZO6's and Nissan Skylines aha
blue92m3 1 year ago
Had an e46 M3 sold it, to slow, Bought a R34 GTR that goes twice as hard. You see what you dont understand is BMW-M Built cars around family cars. The Skyline GTR was build from a Race Car not from a 4door family car like BMW's. BMW has a rich history for building great cars, but not performance cars. The Skyline GTR its History is Beyond RIch its Legenary for thoes into racing. But who are you know your only 20. Can really talk either im only 21
Intendente88 1 year ago
@Intendente88 my friend bought a R34 in Japan, built it with HKS 2.8L kit, that sucks. over 700 HP on the wheels, R35 is a nice car, but can't be upgraded like R34.
liu19870908 1 year ago
@liu19870908 ever heard of the gtr switzer p800 ill bet it blows the most modded r34
nedzad1993 1 year ago
@Intendente88 Not true, the normal version of the Skyline is a family saloon car. Four doors, space for 5 people. The standard engine in a R34 Skyline only produces 155bhp which isn't sporty at all. The car you are talking about is a masterpiece with a twin-turbo charged 332bhp 6L engine (280 bhp listed). These cars are awesome I agree, but they are not built up from a sportscar from the beginning. Even not when you are talking about the very first Skyline. That was a four-door saloon car.
JzAeroo 1 year ago
Comment removed
blue92m3 1 year ago
m power
Lavdr1m 1 year ago
Comment removed
mihaisamp90 1 year ago