Added: 3 years ago
From: LeonardSecond
Views: 6,754
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,177)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @InternetDarkLord

    your science says,refering NG, discovery science, my physicsbook, that nothing is so instable that it explodes to something...mater and anti mater in simular amounts?

    why has matter overcome anti matter?

    how can you live, when you know that your mother doesnt love u but only gets a happy feeling because of chemical reactions?!

    what purpose do you have besides multiplying?

    why are there so few fossils found that could fit between ohter fossils?(transitional forms)

  • @nielsb12345 1. Misquote

    2. Other universes may have more antimatter than matter.

    3. Why not?

    4. There are many transitional fossils, READ a book.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    read the book, evolution a theory in crisis, oh i forgot u likely cant read, cause you dont read my comments that good aswell

    you dont answer my questions, and i have to answer yours...

    how can a tree fossil stand thru layers differing millions of years according to your proven science?

    where did the laws of physic came from?

    why is it more logic that a multiverse always existed and God cant?

    if the multiverse always existed then why u need a big bang?

  • @nielsb12345 READ Talk Origins. Some tree fossils were GROWING through deposited layers, proving they deposited over time, hardened later.

    The laws of physics come from the multiverse. Where does God come from?

    There is no reason to further assume God if the multiverse already existed.

    The Big Bang created our universe, but not the entire multiverse.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    so those tree grow underground? alright look they do that partly but most of the tree is above the ground so what you say there is stupid are you drunk?

    where does the multiverse come from?how does the multiverse create physic laws?

    there is no need for a bigbang a multiverse a universe a star that exploded with pieces of that forming our solar system and eventually us, if you believe in 1 thing...God

    haha you dont even know what the big bang is...you are behind time..

  • @nielsb12345 YES, ROOTS grow underground, through layers built over time that hardened much later. Care to explain?

    The multiverse always existed. Where did God come from?

    YES, there is a need for a start to our particular universe of the multiverse, but no need for God.

    Yes, I know what the Big Bang is, READ physics.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    yes idiot roots grow underground but not a entire tree moran...a tree of 12 meter long is found in layers that differ millions of years...dont tell me you now suddenly forgot to tell me that trees grown underground...fucking idiot

  • @InternetDarkLord

    i dont understand why it is more logic to you that a multiverse always existed and God couldnt do just so...i mean first you say something cant always exist and now suddenly the multiverse always existed...wtf hahaha

    so you believe there was a multiverse, ever seen one?

    read physics? why would i, i already have. you should try to be more of this time, learn your theory better,for it says from nothing came the multiverse not it always existed or it would have no end...moran

  • @nielsb12345 If something, like the multiverse, can exist forever, god is not needed to begin one. If a starter is needed, who made god?

    Yes, I can see the multiverse, or part of it, right now.

    QUOTE where a physics book says that.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    referring to NG channel, known universe;

    in the very beginning there was nothing, nothing is unstable so it explodes ( ???) anti mater and mater were formed for some reason still unknown mater won it from antimater they say it has to do with dark energy...energy you cant see but yeah it is there else the bigbang would be untrue but wait you cant see it, there is no proof so how do you know that is real??

  • @nielsb12345 Dog shit, READ "The Elegant Universe" etc. by Brian Greene and stop garbling NG from memory.

    Who made God? Where did he come from?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    uhm dog shit? dog shit? hmm you have a lot of dog/bull shit boy

    you should know that just because you can asume things they dont have to be true then...you have no evidence of a multiverse,no evidence of a big bang,yeah radiation...but that could also come from the millions of stars...duh.... you have no reason to live yet you want to be immortal, you ask me where God came from when I say He always existed, while you say the multiverse always existed...

    multiverse = your god

  • @nielsb12345 NO, You can see physical reality and test it. Gods are pure faith for no reason.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    God cant always exist...for you He needs to have a maker who made Him, but a multiverse yeah no shit that could always have existed off course.... hahaha you have no idea what you are talking about you say/assume things without even understanding them you think something is proven if you can only assume it...you believe in evolution and u're only looking for evidence to support it but never question it,, that makes u weak, you say its the truth but you can handle THE TRUTH

  • @nielsb12345 NO, I am pointing out the obvious fact if God needs no beginning, physical reality does not need a start. If the multiverse needs a start, then why not god?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    *cant handle THE TRUTH

    you also believe in things that cant be proven like dark energy, like a multiverse that always existed how could that always have existed? wtf where does it come from(i mean God has to be made but the multiverse can have always existed??you have a fucked up mind son!!!) i shall pray for you maybe God can cure your brain!!

    and you are calling yourself Internetdarklord...

    why the fuck should i even take you seriously.?haha

  • @nielsb12345 NO, I cite hard science and logic, you prattle vague, unintelligible bull shit like a five year old.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you come up with arguements like google evolution proven it give 100.000 results so it has to be true, and when i then say google evolution in crisis gives 4500.000 results that doesnt count because googling wrong information gives wrong information..

    you see now you dont make sense at all...

  • @nielsb12345 NO, I merely cited sources. You lack thinking skills.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    googling evolution is proven that is googling wrong information..hahahahahahaha

  • @nielsb12345 Are you drunk?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you avoid evidence against your theory, that is weak, you are weak. so here by i proudly announce that natural selection has choosen you to die, because you are no longer needed for the evolution of humans, with thank you for you cooperation, and wish you the best now you will be nothing more then multiplying dust...

    now that sounds as a hell of a good reason to live man, you have a much bigger believe then me haha

  • @nielsb12345 So boycott human immortality.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    fact evolution is not fully proven

    fact evolution is a theory assumed to be worldwide accepted and religions are dead yet more then 3/4 of the earth believes there is more then this life

    fact you avoid evidence againts your theory

    fact you are not open for other thoughts

    fact you have no respect

    fact you are no more then dust

    fact you have no reason to live

    fact you cant explain whole trees thru hondreds of layers

    fact there are no transitional forms

  • @nielsb12345 FACT: you have no evidence for your assertions.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    fact you dont know what the bible means

    fact you dont know what it means to be a Christian

    fact u say there are no transitional forms because everything is a transitional form well if that is true then what is the transitional form between a fish and a frog? havent seen one...and to you what you cant see is false per definition...

    fact you need dark energy so matter could overcome antimatter...but they cant prove dark energy they assume it else the theory would fall...strange

  • @nielsb12345 LSD or cocaine?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    fact you make me and my friends laugh everytime you react on my comments!! so just wanna say that you are making our days!!! thanks for that :D

  • @nielsb12345 Ignorance is bliss.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you claim that science proves God wrong

    but God is above science so you cant prove him with that

    and you know whats funny all the greatest scientists like newton. einstein all believed in God...

    even your big bang came from a PRIEST..... who claimed that that was the way God created the universe...and now you use it to claim God doesnt exist because a big bang created all...haha hoee your mind twists everything 180 degrees...you are a complete lack of discipline

  • @nielsb12345 Unproven assertions.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    theevolutioncrisis*DOT*org*DOT­*uk/testimony2*DOT*php

    read this

    i know you wont read it (((or maybe you do but then you dont read it carefully enough with your low concetrated brain))) but well at least im trying...

  • @nielsb12345 Read "the Longest Running Lie" on Talk Origins. People have been saying this bull shit since 1825. The same things, over and over.

  • it is a dutch site, but here they say that evo is random because of its enviroment...

    resource*DOT*wur*DOT*nl/wetens­chap/detail/evolutie-is-voorsp­elbaar-en-willekeurig/

    before you accuse me for googling wrong information...that doesnt even make sense but you make no sense...i googled in dutch for Is evolution random or not

  • @nielsb12345 NO, if the website says that it is contradictory. Things that follow the environment are not random, since the environment is not random. Mutation is random, but natural selection, hence evolution, is not.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    wtf you simply avoid the fact that evolution is random in a way that is forced to happen by nature and nature is random. and then you tell me that i avoid the truth no shit...you make no sense at all...such a child

  • @nielsb12345 BULL SHIT, you just made no coherent sense! Are you drunk?  What are you saying? Why is nature random?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    nature is random, the conditions the weather the temperature offcourse they all compare with eachother but to have them all perfectly good at the same time thats kind of hard so that is random, so says my physics teacher, so says almost every evolutionist site, so says every anti-evolutionist site, so says every book of biology i've had so no im not drunk, are you or are you analfabetic?cause you dont read my comments really good to

  • @nielsb12345 BULL SHIT, weather is the result of natural forces, not random. That is why there are so few blizzards in the Amazon, or hurricanes in Kansas. Damn are you ignorant. QUOTE where Darwin said evolution is random, word for word and page number.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    ooh dushbag silly silly child, dont you know that conditions like weather are based on certain reactions in the environment? and that only if those reactions happen at that place a that time, you get a good life holding condition..so it is random... your own theory says just so...read evolution...conditions are random, mutations are random, you are nothing more than a ignorant dust, you have no reason to live, Darwin only subscried micro-evolution so its not fair to ask that

  • @nielsb12345 Bull Shit, Evolutionary scientists do not believe evolution is random. The environment is not random either, so that proves nothing.

    Why is the environment random?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    see my comments below

  • @nielsb12345 ONLY for comedy.

  • because:

    u have to multiply all those chances,so the chance of all is very small.

    and those chances are as big as they are under perfect conditions,but in the beginning earth wasnt... the weather(cold/warm,rain,snow,wi­nd,sunlight,other radiation,air pressure)isnt calculated in those chances, and those things all make it alot more difficult then it already was to the first aminoacids/proteins/and cell would survive for so long that other life would evolve from it...auwtjs

  • @nielsb12345 Nonsense, you are citing strawmen.

  • but ill give you all the luck:a aminoacid will form and with all the luck he finds other aminoacids in such an order that a protein is formed, then the chance of proteins finding other proteins also in such an order that a cellmembrame is made so DNA can be saved and cell organs are made so the cell lives and also that he immediately know how to multiply,there are alot of problems with that..because:

  • @nielsb12345 Nonsense, abiogenesis is not random.

  • Scientists saw bacteria as the most simple creatures on earth, for they are small and have only a few chromosones,yet even they have cell-organels that are working so complex you dont understand:P

    so they are not as simple as thought yet life came forward out of them....now you say yeah but in the beginning they were simpler than this. how do you know that?

  • @nielsb12345 Because I read science, not strawmen.

  • and today the simplest protein is made of 100 aminoacids instead of 10...

  • @nielsb12345 So?

  • @nielsb12345 "the simplest protein is made of 100 aminoacids" No it's not. I can name one with only 51. But isn't the subject here really Noah's mythical flood? When was the last time anybody covered the geology and chemistry that directly rules that out. A week? Two? At any rate, a careful examination of geology directly falsifies the flood and reveals that Genesis is not literal. If Genesis is not literal, then the question remains, what else is not literal in the Bible? Hmmm.

  • @NorthForkFisherman

    yo,

    51 is still alot of aminoacids,i mean they all have to be in a certain order to work as a protein,and 1 protein doesnt make a cell..but im curious what is the name of this protein?

    well i believe in God and that He stands above physical laws and time,so for my part He made some extra water to flood the entire world,but for as far as i care maybe only the land of Noah stood underwater,and only the animals there needed to be saved, that sound scientifically more logic

  • @nielsb12345 Insulin. It's a polypeptide which has both a primary and secondary structure held together with a disulfide bond which makes it a protein hormone. Now, your statement "He stands above physical laws and time" means that you are invoking magic. That really kind of takes rationality out of the picture. If you dismiss proof then you can claim anything - which also means that whatever you claim is also meaningless. If you have no data to prove a point, you have no point.

  • @NorthForkFisherman

    alright i didnt know that,

    i know that that is weird for someone like you that doesnt believe in God, but to me the bible is sort of proof and to me the whole universe i proof that God exists,but that ofcourse is just the way you want to interpretate things, you cant blame me for that and i dont blame you for that either, i think respect is the greatest good so who am i to judge what is wrong or right,right.

  • @NorthForkFisherman

    all im saying is that science does not exlude God and God does not exclude science. but for me that is easy to believe because i believe in God... so i believe in unexplainable (i dont know it thats a real word but you;ll understand it i hope;) ) wonders!

  • @NorthForkFisherman

    so look to me science can may disproof Gods wonders, but then yeah to me God is almighty so He stands above those laws,but then i also believe in God already so thats no evidence i understand.

    but from a scientific point,the bible was also written by what people saw, so if for them the whole world stood under water maybe it was only a part of the land but to for them that part was the whole world...i dont know cause i wasnt there,but to me all options are open :)

  • look i found alot of sites saying that calculations of the first protein was much simpler then it is now, well they got a point but even then, there is 20 different aminoacids that have to form by chance, that is possible i agree, then if u got a protein that consists of 10 aminoacids & it does matter in what order they boundyou got 20^10= 1,000*10^13 so 1 of 10.000.000.000.000 that they will form a protein,but a protein doesnt LIVE..you need more of them like 100s for 1 simple cel without dna..

  • @nielsb12345 Abiogenesis is not by chance.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    winteryknight*DOT*wordpress*DO­T*com/2010/02/16/doug-axe-expl­ains-the-chances-of-getting-a-­functional-protein-by-chance/

  • @nielsb12345 Abiogenesis is not by chance.

  • @nielsb12345 Psuedoscience! And there is no creationist science theory. Tell me hoe God made anything? What did he do? Any experiments?

    I will become immortal, you die and see if being a pine crate of maggot chow gets you into heaven.

  • Comment removed

  • @InternetDarkLord

    *DOT*newgeology*DOT*us/present­ation32*DOT*html

    *DOT*allaboutscience*DOT*org/d­arwins-theory-of-evolution*DOT­*htm

    *DOT*infidels*DOT*org/library/­modern/mark_vuletic/denton*DOT­*html

    and there are another 497000000 results of problems with èvolution theory.

    u know what's funny you said the bible was false because people adapt the way the interpretate it and some many say it is false, well evolution is false simply because there are so many people who say so too...U FAIL

  • Comment removed

  • @nielsb12345 BULL SHIT You just cherry pick real science and read psuedoscience. I will prove it, you die and see if heaven is there, I will use real science to become immortal. Agreed?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    There is no adequate explanation for the origin of life from dead chemicals. Even the simplest life form is tremendously complex.

    The fossil record, our only documentation of whether evolution actually occurred in the past, lacks any transitional forms, and all types appear fully-formed when first present. The evidence that "pre-men" (ape-men) existed is dubious at best. So called pre-man fossils turn out to be those of apes, extinct apes, fully man, or historical frauds

  • Comment removed

  • @nielsb12345 1. The simplest life today is not what started life, so your argument is bull shit.

    2. Read Talk Origins or even Wikipedia, there are transitional forms, you are the fraud.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    true

    but the simplest protein is what is needed for life to start ... duh im not talking about complex molecule structures just about one tiny simple protein. the chance of that debatable but it is about 1 out of 10^113 to 1 out of 10^260

    where did you prove my math wrong boy?

    talkorigins*DOT*org/indexcc/CB­/CB010*DOT*html

    bijbelstudies*DOT*com/pro*DOT*­htm

  • @nielsb12345 I proved you one in a billion is nonsense, there are over a billion GALAXIES known, never mind planets. That means life is inevitable.

    ALSO, abiogenesis is not random.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    also its a fact, at least scientist assume it... so for you its a fact:P ,that in the beginning with the big bang, partical and anti-partical have been formed in the same amount, only problem is according to your science if anti-partical and partical have contact with eachother they inplode to nothing but a lil energy,how then can it be that there are so fucking many particals left?and no anti-particals are found yet?teach me ow all knowing master

  • Comment removed

  • @nielsb12345 There could simply be great physical distances between the matter-antimatter, or the amounts slightly unequal.

    Tell me where god came from, who made him?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    God always existed how is that so hard to believe and a multiverse that always existed is not...really logic boy

    nope according to scientists and NG channel they simply have no clue what happened in the first milliseconds after the big bang and they have no idea how matter could overcome anti matter...

  • @nielsb12345 NONSENSE! NG is not all science, and if God can exist uncreated, so can anything else.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    huh you came up with "where did God came from who made Him blablabla" then you say that the multiverse always existed, and when i say that that is weird because where did that came from you say if God can exist uncreated so can anything else..but for you God cant exist uncreated so i asume the multiverse cant either...

  • @nielsb12345 If the multiverse can exist uncreated, WHY assume God created it?  Why posit him?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    how do you know so sure that there was a multiverse?and that is was there uncreated?your so calles science, refering to NG channel, they say the multiverse came from nothing, nothing is so unstable it turned into mater and anti mater.and somehow matter won it from anti mater...there from the universe was formed and then us why do you assume that...haha

  • @nielsb12345 Keep watching, there is evidence in string theory or worm hole theory.

    Where did God come from?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you know what is funny al the best physics and biologists and other scientists of the past like einstein, all saw that at least somekind of intellegence IS needed, even Darwin said so when he was dying on his bed so they say, he even talked about God if you believe the witnessess. now you use what they saw as "evidence" for a God, to prove God isnt needed...kind of weird if you ask me

  • @nielsb12345 BS, many scientists do not believe in God, nor does that disprove Deep Time or Evolution.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    explain me this,on NG channel they say the multiverse came from nothing,nothing is so untstable it formed the higs-partical what formed the multiverse in it, and from that the universe came. but where did physical laws came from again?? what made sure that chemical reaction react the way they do now, where did gravity came from? where did time came from? why do you need dark matter to hold our solar system on place?

  • Comment removed

  • @nielsb12345 "nothing" refers to the quantum fluactation of empty space creating matter.

    Who made god? Where did he come from?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you sound like if you all know it so good but i think you are just bluffing, i mean you are talking big words but have no idea what they mean, you dont know the chance of the simplest protein to form even if all the aminoacids were already in place...you are talking about a multiverse that always exists but God cant..hoee you make me laugh

  • watch this!!really i know its like 3 hours long so thats reaaallly long but at about 17 min he talks how we can explain a flood that covered the earth. and what problems the evolutiontheory has.

    watch?v=DAvH2Q2SkRo

  • @nielsb12345 Anyone can post anything on youtube. Experiments in human immortality have started, we will know if you really believe in god in heaven soon enough.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    i hope so that they find the genetic code that makes us mortal. but thats kind of weird too why would a living thing have a code in its dna that says he dies at some age...??

  • Comment removed

  • @nielsb12345 Evolution changes DNA. People can, too. Want to die for your garbage and see if heaven is real?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    if you'd ask me if i would die to see if it is true, i dont know man God gave me this life why end it? but if that would prove to the entire world that God exists i hope i got the courage to do just so, if you die its all over arent you afraid of that boy?

  • @nielsb12345 So you die for your beliefs, I live for mine.

    Good riddance, mortal.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    no i live for my beliefs you are dead in a couple of years..

  • @nielsb12345 So, will you die to see if heaven is really there?

  • watch this:

    alright the second vid is not muslim-based but shares the simular ideas of why evolution sucks as i have

    watch?v=3yNju1_-CMk

    watch?v=r1jPSN-cY-w&feature=re­lated

  • @nielsb12345 Scientific immortality experiments have started, we will be rid of the gullible mortals soon enough.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    i hope you dont die before that else if you havent accepted God, you are going to hell the Bible is very clear about that... have you actually read the bible once?i mean you always say read science uhuhuh read the bible, cs lewis did for he tried to make sure the whole bible was wrong,he was atheist,so he started to read and quess what he started to believe...

  • @nielsb12345 You are going to hell, unless: you sell your daughters into slavery, you stone to death people who work on the Sabbath, you turn the cheek when hit, you go 2 miles when forced into one, you execute city rape victims, you give all your money to the poor, you give your coat when someone takes your cloak, you pierce all your Hebrew slaves in the ear with an awl, you never take oaths, the Bible says all that, right?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    nope, you go to hell if you dont accept Jesus.

    the rules God gave humanity were there in the first place to let us see that we needed Jesus and his sacrafice. you never read the bible now did you haha you have no idea what God says to you in His Word. if you read the new testement i think you'll have a complete other idea of God and Christians...but you are to ignorant to do so..

  • @nielsb12345 Nonsense, many of those quotes are Jesus, READ the damn Bible!

  • @InternetDarkLord

    many of what quotes, you should learn how to write a reason for a complain...

  • @nielsb12345 Many of my quotes in that post were from Jesus, so "if you read the new testament" is nonsense. So is "to let us see that we needed Jesus..."

  • @InternetDarkLord

    Jesus said if someone hits you you should turn the other cheek that is not weakness that is strong. you know what animals do when they are strong they show their neck(their most vuneralbe point)to show they are strong and not afraid...that is what it means...not everything in the bible is that literly///

  • @nielsb12345 So how do you know what in the Bible is literal?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    uhm by reading it you'll see what is literal and what not....

  • @nielsb12345 HOW? Different Christians give different answers reading the same thing. HOW?

  • what i dont understand is that, alright you got a living cell or maybe an entire creature but how the fuck does he know that he has to develop cells that can "catch" light?because you;ll never know if there is light untill you have something like an eye so you will never know that you need to develop an eye, because you dont know that there is light...so why would you right? explain me that!!please

  • @nielsb12345 Many chemicals are sensitive to light, no one needs to know that it is there for eyespots to evolve.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    yeah but how does a cell "know" that he must combine these cells put a lens in front of it some liquid between the lens and the chemicals, make the chemicals to actual cells that work together, to see light?

  • @nielsb12345 The theory of evolution does not say it knows, it is a chemical reaction. And not all eyes even now have a lens anyway.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    so you say for evolution the creature that evolves doesnt even know what he is going to evolve untill it is there..

  • @nielsb12345 Evolution is not planned by living things, at least until humans arrive.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    ...where the fuck did i say evolution is planned by living things?it is planned by luck...but how does luck know you need that kind of proteins in that kind of order on that place so you could see...

  • @nielsb12345 No, evolution is by environment, not luck. Evolution is not random.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    it is luck that the environment is perfectly good for evolution ... the science you are the entire time regarding to. says the same...

  • @nielsb12345 The evolution can only happen where the environment is suited for it. No one on Venus is alive to wonder why it is a bad place for evolution.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you say evolution can only happen when the evironment is suited for it.just as i said like 2 days ago..:P

    but if the enviroment needs to be so perfectly good, the chance for that is very small right?so there is a chance so my math and the math of like alot of evolutionists is relevant,thats right evolutionists talk about that chance aswell you stupid

  • @nielsb12345 BS, mutations are chance, the rest, like natural selection, is by environment. READ science books.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    it is random that the world is in excat that spot and that far from the sun and has that amount of water a good atmosphere so life could live... it is even more lucky that aminoacids form themeselves without being destroyed by the byproduct of the reaction...water. explain to me how that is possible

  • @nielsb12345 Only planets suited to life have any. Nobody on Venus or Jupiter wonders why it is badly placed or suited for life.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    im not talking about jupiter or venus/...your comment doesnt make any sense, i said that there is just so little chance that there is a place with conditions perfectly perfectly perfectly good for evolution...you actually admit it by giving me two planets where conditions are not that good...after years of searching nasa found just 1 planet simular to earth but without our atmosphere...

  • @nielsb12345 BS, there are billions of galaxies, and new planets are discovered in our ONE all the time. The numbers you gave me FAVOR life, even though some are wrong anyway!

  • @InternetDarkLord

    /watch?v=O2OADc9DVY0

    /watch?v=oaBrOu0QcvU&feature=r­elated

    /watch?v=Qr_oFBjonhM&feature=r­elated

    if you got time please watch these!

    you need to know that im sceptic about some ideas of the church and christians aswell but i simply dont believe in a chance of life that small!!but please lets respect eachothers opinion,allright?because i think we;re both to stuborn to give in...am i right haha?

  • @nielsb12345 Bull Shit, read abiogenesis books. Scientists are already working on creating life.  Human immortality experiments have started, so if you believe this garbage, prove it, die and see if heaven is real motal

  • @InternetDarkLord

    God wont let Him prove Hisself, He doesnt want you to believe in Him, He wants you to love Him, with prove of Him people wouldnt really love Him for what He did. people who say they found scientific evidence of Him are stupid

  • @nielsb12345 PROVE it. You die and see if heaven is real, I will become immortal and have a drink.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    Jesus made 600 liter wine, the best so they say, out of water. i drink in this life and i bet im gonna have a drink with my Saviour, cant wait for that

  • @nielsb12345 Good bye mortal....

  • @InternetDarkLord

    haha you said goodbey mortal, why are you talking about yourself again fag

  • @nielsb12345 How do you know?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    how do you know it is not?

  • @nielsb12345 I prove by doing: joining the immortality movement.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    pff haha so you are becoming a christian then?

    how else do you wanna become immoral? by chancing your genetic code that kills you? why is that code even there in the first place i mean good mutation for millions of years would have changed that already right? i dont think they will ever succeed to change that code in humans that way that we would be immortal...and if they do you are already dead

  • @nielsb12345 There are multiple real ways to achieve immortality, genetic engineering, bionics, downloading, etc. Stop flaunting your stupidity before you get yourself killed.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    well i you have immortality, give me a sign and i still believe in God then...

    haha you suck so hard, i didnt say that chancing the genetic code is the only way, learn to read..:P

    i said that they havent found the genetic code in your dna that "kills" you.look it up thats a fact moran

  • @nielsb12345 DNA can be changed, and there is also bionics, downloading, etc. If you disagree, DIE.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    it will take years before they know what genetic code kills you, watch NG channel/ discovery/ google it/ wikipedia it..

    hhaha you talk alot about dying and death for someone who thinks he is immortal, i must die to proof to you that after that im immortal...how can i prove that when im dead...are you really that stupid or are you just trying to be that carelessly and ofcourse really cool...*sarcasm.., you do know what that is right...*

  • @nielsb12345 If you do not like immortals, do not become one.

    Natural Selection.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    who said i didnt like immortality, your comments dont make any sense...i believe in God and in a heaven, and when i die here i live there forever...im immortal then...what does you make thinking that i dont like immortality...

  • @nielsb12345 The next stage of human evolution is scientific immortality, I hope you are convinced by then.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    for as far as i know scientists havent been able to find the genetic code that tells our cells to die/multiply and stuff. they thought they found one but that appeared to be the genetic code only for the making of RNA, so you are still mortal..

    when i die, i live

    when you die, you are dead thats right :P

  • @nielsb12345 No, you die for a talking donkey, I live for science.

    RNA is the messenger molecule for DNA, so your post is hogwash.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    Science doesnt exclude God. it only proves you need intelegence for the making of life, is doesnt prove God cant exist and doesnt prove Him either so that is an endless discussion and has nothing to do if evolution is fully proven or not...

  • @nielsb12345 So who designed the perfect designer for our cosmos?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    no one God always existed, He stands above time, but you wont understand that, you need evidence, and the evidence we have( the Bible) you dont believe...

  • @nielsb12345 The Bible does not prove anything, there are many Holy books out there you do not believe.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    if you die where are you, indeed nowhere, if you love someone you dont love someone your mother doesnt love you, your friends dont love you they only have some stupid chemical reaction,

    im glad i can tell someone really loves me, and i know love is more then just chemistry, live your life your way and i live it my way i wont judge you my God will. amen

  • @nielsb12345 So will you DIE to prove heaven is really there?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    Yep, if that would prove to you God is real, would you die to prove im wrong?

  • @nielsb12345 Why would I die to prove scientific immortality is possible?

  • what i really dont understand is that God send its only Son to earth to die, even for you foolish guys...

  • @nielsb12345 No, the Feathered Serpent God is displeased by your lack of faith!

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you know the devil you look a bit like him, i mean you carry his name, you say i have a lack of faith, you take conclusions without 100% proof of them, you sound like a little spoiled girl that thinks she knows it all.

  • @nielsb12345 So you die and prove it. I have things to do in the 25th century besides feeding maggots because of a book with a talking donkey says heaven is real.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    and i got better things to do then reading a book where you are not more then a talking monkey...

  • @nielsb12345 That is not what is says.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    okay well then what does is say... i mean you constantly disagree with me but never give a good reason for that...

  • @nielsb12345 You keep saying things that are not in science books, like comments about random chance. READ science books.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    it is not science it is simple math ... 

  • @nielsb12345 No, abiogenesis and evolution are not random, so your math is irrelevant.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    why is it not random then? there is a chance everything goes like it goes...so it is random...hoee

  • @nielsb12345 That is gibberish. Why is everything random?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    you know you say i should read science books but i already have...you stupid:P

    you are saying things that arent in the bible, like stoning your wifes and stuff. if you really know what God says to you thru His word you'd better

  • @nielsb12345 I said stoning children, and that is in the Bible. You are commanded to kill people like your wife for many things, like working on the Sabbath. Its all there.

  • @InternetDarkLord

    stoning children? haha dude you read the bible all wrong!! Those were the rules of the old testement, they were there to protect people from doing sins, but God saw that people couldnt handle the law and so Jesus came to earth for all our sins, and now it doesnt matter if you sin because it can be forgiven. working on sabbath isnt wrong if its needed you sound like one of the Pharisees.

  • @nielsb12345 BS, you do not believe the New Testament either, you merely claimed you can tell what is literal by reading. So why do Christians disagree on what is literal?

  • @InternetDarkLord

    christian disagree because it is hard to see what is literal and what not, but that doesnt mean the bible is false.

    why would i die to show you if heaven is real??i mean when im dead how the fuck do you know where i am...haha

    because it is random ask any scientist

    no not just the world>> Gods creation, but you will never know

    where have you already pointed out my numbers for favor evolution?you only said i was wrong...never gave me a reason...

    hahaha you are so stupid

  • @nielsb12345 No, evolution is not random, READ scientists.

    You said the odds against evolution are a billion to one, but based on current data, there are more than a billion planets. Since evolution is NOT random, your odds are wrong anyway.

    If you do not believe in mainstream science, that includes scientific immortality. Die and prove it.