Too cheesy, glad they didn't use it. There was really little impact. The lines were delivered poorly and didn't really impact me at all, and she just looked ridiculous.
Glad this never saw the light of day in theaters.
I've watched Terminator 4 in theater and I don't understand ending. It's my opinion, that the annihilation of the human race is caused by people's dark heart, not by Skynet. Hate and despair. Is that right?
Nonsense! in 1997 John Connor could'nt be that age! Terminator 2 takes place in 1995! How's that he becomes from a preteen to an adult and with a dughter in just 2 years??
That's another reason why Cameron was told to change it. It sets up a HUGE paradox. If the sequels were better, then maybe Cameron would realize that this ending wasn't the best.
For a movie with such great makeup, how the hell did they make old Sarah look so bad? They must have known going in that this wouldn't see the light of day.
This ending really never had potential to be in the movie, because John was conceived because of Judgment Day, meaning John's existence is to fight the machines. With no war, John wouldn't exist.
All you people arguing about the plot, all I have to say is lol. You're all tripping your minds out thinking about this stuff, just take from the movie what you will and enjoy. Yes it is very insane and confusing but nothing to argue about.
if the war of the machines is prevented then technically john cannot exist can he? for starters the time machine would have never been invented because the terminators made the time machine. and john would never meet kyle and will never send him back in time to sleep with his mother and so he will never be born.
1. if you go back in time and kill your mum before you're born you dissappear (stop existing, butterfly effect) because you were never born.
2. you can kill your mum and nothing happens to the 'you' whos travelled back in time.
But this ending seems to go along with method 2. because in this ending john never has the chance to send kyle reese back in tiime to save sarah and conceive john.
The obvious implication of this ending would be no further sequels. Of course, on another level, this ending could never happen. Skynet would still have to be created and judgment day would still have to occur or you would have a paradox. See Novikov's self consistency principle... The probability of an event occurring, that would create a paradox, is zero. This is why the third film moves forward with judgment day, but in a horribly flawed manner. That's another story altogether though.
If this ending stayed. there would of been no Terminator 3, No Sarah Connor Chronicles, No Terminator Salvation. Best reason to keep the Movie ending as it is is simply Finacial
wow...man I am crazy glad that someone told them this was NOT a good ending...though...3 was NOT a good continuation...and 4 was pretty lame...hmm maybe this would have been better, huh?
I think the point of the 3rd movie if Cameron had done it would have been Connor would've been Defense Secretary or President and traded rise of machines for the ability to win the war he foresaw!
Although I like the original ending, the truth is if this had been the ACTUAL ending, that poor light technician would not have been yelled at by Christian Bale.
If the Machines are stopped, Kyle could have never gone back in time to meet Sarah to have John, therefor John wouldn't have existed because the machines have been stopped ;X
John's mother gave birth to him way before his dad was born.. Which mean, if time were on track was John's dad always the same? Or did he tecnically send Kyle back to change who his dad became? :O
i dont really know, but we dont even know if its possible to change the future. if they stopped judgement day 100% then the dark future will be erased. We dont know about kyle, if they did stop it then he should be forgotten out of thin air and people's memories.Then john still should be alive and when he grows up, he sends kyle to the past for a diffrent reason, probably not because of a terminator. but those are all theorys. but i do know where you are going. but idk100%
Well in this alternate ending, the dark future never came, therfor Kyle would exist, but never be sent back in time. Unless time is two different alternate realities.
they would never had stopped 100% cuz thats just how the things happen... so basically the world's end has to come, and john would be killed by the t - 800 as sed in the third movie ;)
John can't have a different dad. The legend of Sarah is that she trained John to prepare for the future war. I doubt Sarah would do this without KYLE going back and informing her of the future war.
Kyle will always go back in time. Kyle will always be John's father.
This means the T-800 will always go back in time, and it's chip will always serve in the existance of Skynet. And who's to say Cyberdyne doesn't have back-up files? Judgment Day could ALWAYS happen.
But I kind of prefer Cameron's films and don't really consider these crappy sequels as well canon sequels.
SO, assuming this was the real end.. You're basically saying that by Kyle going back, he has created an alternate timeline, therfor the time he was from would have never changed, but he created a different time, in the Terminator 1-2 films. Which defeats the other paradox's of sorts.
I'm not assuming Kyle created an alternate timeline and/or reality. He came from "one possible future." That one possible future is the one with Kyle as John Connor's father, and where John leads humanity, and prevails, against the machines. Kyle did not create an alternate timeline.
I could PM you a whole explanation on this. I don't have enough room :/
But you see, Kyle MUST'VE created an alternate timeline, otherwise it would go back to my original paradox, in which IF Judgement day was stopped for good, there would be no dark future. John would be doing what he's doing in this video. Therfor never having sent Kyle back to create him, which would ultimately not have John, in which this wouldnt' happen, nor would this scene happen, since the Machines would've won. =/
I'm doubting the alternate timeline theory. The way I see it is that John needs to eliminate ANYTHING that will give birth to Skynet. Like many others have said, if this ending existed, John Connor wouldn't, and so wouldn't Skynet.
The way to really put it there is this:
If Skynet doesn't build the Time Displacement Equipment for the T-800 to go through, then John Connor doesn't have to send back Kyle. Which means both parties wouldn't exist later on.
That would make it the alternate reality timeline in which not only is time written in stone, or it's inevitable, but the fact that the whole fact of sending terminators or Kyle back in time would've been pointless since the Machines WILL lose.
@Dmasterman well not terminator 3 exactly. kyle and the terminators already appeared in the past meaning they have necessarily already left the future so i think you cant have time travel without determinism. in my eyes the fact that they appeared in the past proves that you cant change the future and the time travel and the resistance were never alternate timelines at all. it was just the natural progression leading up to the same cycle. thats the only way i could ever make sense of it
@Dmasterman It isn't though. I mean... Reese was John's dad. That means sending him back in time wasn't a deviation from the original timeline, otherwise John wouldn't have been born and sent Reese back in time. The past and the future are written in stone because they are interdependent.
It is an alternate timeline. If this ending were true/canon/official, then Kyle DID create an alternate timeline by stopping the dark future. But this timeline is ongoing while John in the original future is still living in the dark future trying to rebuild.
My good man, thank you for saying that. I was just about to explain how them sending anybody back to begin with had to mean that that was already predetermined that they will send it back, so it's all one universe time line all along. But you said it much better, and i agree 100%: that is the only way i can ever make sense of it.
HOWEVER, if this is the case that Kyle created an alternate relatiy while another reality is already in existence and cannot change, that would mean, that sending a Terminator or Kyle back would have NEVER changed the outcome of that timeline Kyle was originally from. Which would have defeated the purpose of the time travelling thing all together.
I was laughing when Sarah Connor said that Michael Jackson turned 40 (he actually turned 39, this is a calculation error) at 0:23. Hoo hoo hee... long live the King.
In the 1st movie Reese said he was from "one possible future" so I suppose this ending is valid if he meant that time travel creates parallel worlds instead of causing paradoxes.
One day this shit will happen in real life, I garuntee you that, I mean Somethings going to wipe out the human race, either natural disaster, hells apocalypse or nuclear war
I disagree if people were more tolerant and intelligent and understood that hate fear primitive and would see that we are a race we should live as one we might stand a chance, while Im at it you would be able to see that any including all is a load of rubbish, an intelligent person would be able to see through the imaginative god and see the truth in science and logic.
An intelligent person doesn't criticize ones belief, the way to truth and understanding is to let everyone believe what they want without hatred towards anyone.
I prefer the theatrical ending... but if Cameron would have chosen this one as the original, we now wouldn´t have the shitty 3rd part and the okay 4th one... it should have ended with this! GO CAMERON! Can´t wait for AVATAR!!!
Exactly what I thought, so this ending wouldn't have made any sense because John only existed in the first place because of the war. Him still being around showed that the war still happened.
this ending is good and i like t2. but like most people picked up if the future war was stopped then resse wouldnt go back to strut his stuff with sarah and john wouldnt have been there pushing his kid on a swing
T4 was a piece of shit littleman -rottentomatoes is just a compilation of reviewers - and fuck home alone 1 as well - what are you 5 years old? - you're boring me
what i meant by that was rottentomatoes sucks dick at rating movies, like you. all those "reviwers" are just a bunch of retarded nerds who pick on every little detail. fuck you and fuck them both
now get out of your moms basement and go find some chick and get laid. fall in love with something else other than T2
They should of left it with the original ending and never made absolutely abominations of the last two. Could not even sit through them they were so shit.
If only this ending was in the original version. Terminator 3 & Salvation wouldn't have even exsisted. Those damn directors and their desire for a quick buck. Makes me sick.
Eh, you gotta give them a little credit. Terminator 3 and Salvation weren't good, but they certainly weren't the worst movies ever. Also, for better or worse, they were successful at making big bucks. ;-)
I will be fair, T3 & Salv. weren't God awful (trust me I've seen WAY worse films) but they were unnecessary. I do know the difference between unnecessary (Indy 4 & every single Disney sequel) and just plain horrible (Batman & Robin and Dragonball Evolution).
Okay for the time line theory its rather simple, if you take two reactants in an experiment and they combine to create a product, then you have a product period. Taking away the reactants doesn't get rid of the product at this point. This is the same with the Future War and Kyle Reese, they both are the reactants, and they produce John Connor. If the Future is destroyed and Kyle is gone, that doesn't mean John ceases to be, he was already produced, hes here to stay.
I believe the same, there is a timeline where John Connor it's slightly different because his father is another dude, and then when he send Kyle Reese back in time, who was in love of Sara from seeing her picture, he became the father of another child who Sarah calls John cos' of Kyle's story. So he is a different John Connor, he became leader of the ressistance because he will be preparing for that since birth.
for this would disagree look at this way. whenever one goes back in time you create a branch in the river of time or alternate timeline. their are no paradoxes. With the death of the guy who invented skynet , the destruction of the lab, and destroying the chip, the protoype arm, and both terminators, in the steel mill all possible ways for skynet to be created have been destroyed. John would not cease to exist because he is an alternate John. The war doesnt happen and he becomes a senator.
i wish it was this ending. BUT STUPID JONATHAN MOSTOW HAD TO DO IT
HelloNewYorkCity 2 years ago
If only they'd used this ending. No dire T3 and no borning T4!
MrOp86 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
FortitudeOfHeaven 2 years ago
how did they get the clothes right?? lol
AOCRkid 2 years ago
this ending sucks ass
BigAngeloSantorini 2 years ago
michael jackson would have been 39!
Poleyonline 2 years ago 2
Too cheesy, glad they didn't use it. There was really little impact. The lines were delivered poorly and didn't really impact me at all, and she just looked ridiculous.
Glad this never saw the light of day in theaters.
MrGeneric67 2 years ago
I've watched Terminator 4 in theater and I don't understand ending. It's my opinion, that the annihilation of the human race is caused by people's dark heart, not by Skynet. Hate and despair. Is that right?
MarleHunter85 2 years ago
Michael Jackson turned 40.
Never expected to hear that.
Mrster 2 years ago 3
Ironic thing is On August 29th 1997 Michael Jackson would have been 39 not 40 lol
gamestar92 2 years ago
@gamestar92
You are retarded. That is not irony. You do not understand irony.
Cyphairius 2 years ago
"Verbal and situational irony is often intentionally used as emphasis in an assertion of a truth"
Yeah so, fuck off you twat go and call wikipedia a retard
gamestar92 2 years ago
It wasn't ironic, it was just wrong.
Cyphairius 2 years ago
I kinda like pretending the events of Terminator 3 didn't happen, because it wasn't very good.
Delta4845 2 years ago 5
Agreed deleta. This is the ending we should have had.
In some messed up way I always grew up imagining if this was ever real, a big ending to things. One line that always stuck with me through the years.
" If a machine can learn the value of human life....maybe we can too".
We live in hope.
billyboy1871 2 years ago
@Delta4845 Terminator is like Alien best is the second, after that its Rape.....
Darkernorakeln 2 years ago
lol. the "michael jackson turned forty" line was funny.
btw, where's little kyle reese in this scene?
predlycon 2 years ago 3
lol yeah that line was funny.. because it was SO important in this storyline XD lol
AzEvanz 2 years ago
uh didnt he die in the first terminator?
kolisionn 2 years ago
yes, michael jackson did die in the first terminator.
JoeyHollywood1 2 years ago
that's a good ending
TheSHEERHEARTATTACK 2 years ago
Jeez what a miserable ending Im so glad they didnt go with that sugar coated pish.
BTW there are NO 'alternate reality timelines' as the film accurately depicts, consequently there are no paradoxes created.
Manoo62 2 years ago
john doesnt look like christian bale xD
IRAQI6TNT 2 years ago 2
lol what fact checker fucked up on michael jackson's birth year?
maikeru01 2 years ago 3
Nonsense! in 1997 John Connor could'nt be that age! Terminator 2 takes place in 1995! How's that he becomes from a preteen to an adult and with a dughter in just 2 years??
daemonaeon 2 years ago
@daemonaeon they didn't say this was 1997, they said 1997 passed and nothing happened. this is after that.
maikeru01 2 years ago 2
it isn't 1997 dude, listen to what they're saying. This is 30 years after or so.
Atheist269 2 years ago 2
Yeah, I listened carefully again. Sorry, English isn't my native language. So, I didn't get the idea.
daemonaeon 2 years ago
wait if that would have happened then john shoudnt have been born. (thinks to hard and head explodes)
coltoncollis 2 years ago
That's another reason why Cameron was told to change it. It sets up a HUGE paradox. If the sequels were better, then maybe Cameron would realize that this ending wasn't the best.
JudahBenHur007 2 years ago
this ending doesn't make sense, how can reese go back when the war was prevented? that means john could not have been born. he shouldn't even exist.
dvsxavier 2 years ago
with the existence of the time machine, i think this is posible. i like this ending
S3rrgiio 2 years ago
michael jackson turned 40? hahaha
dvsxavier 2 years ago
Believe it or not, Cameron prefered this ending, and still does.
It's too sappy, which is why it was changed, but at least it would have prevented those really crappy sequels.
It's not too bad though, and Cameron does sappy really well anyway.
(Ex. THE ABYSS, TITANIC, and AVATAR)
JudahBenHur007 2 years ago
For a movie with such great makeup, how the hell did they make old Sarah look so bad? They must have known going in that this wouldn't see the light of day.
Gopherbassist 2 years ago
no thats someone else
69ALXX 2 years ago
No, it's not.
Gopherbassist 2 years ago
ohh my bad well than thats some REALLY BAD make up hahaha
69ALXX 2 years ago
Good thing they didn't go with this.
typhonsentra 2 years ago
I think the best terminator ending is in the third one.
Zurvivorr 2 years ago
Wow...
biporio 2 years ago
i thought judgement day is invetible
legopooper24 2 years ago
@legopooper24
It never said that till the 3rd movie...which, if you go by this, never happened....which I think we can all agree would've been the best.
Emininity 2 years ago
This ending really never had potential to be in the movie, because John was conceived because of Judgment Day, meaning John's existence is to fight the machines. With no war, John wouldn't exist.
emoklan 2 years ago
This is indeed a genuine 3rd Alternative ending of T2.
This can be seen on the T2 DVD which features all 3 Alternative Endings, 2 being visible on the menu which are Theatrical & Special Editions.
Just highlight the Special Edition option and key in '82997' (without qoutes), to unlock the hidden 3rd alternative ending.
DJmixtrixx 2 years ago
All you people arguing about the plot, all I have to say is lol. You're all tripping your minds out thinking about this stuff, just take from the movie what you will and enjoy. Yes it is very insane and confusing but nothing to argue about.
Riskygodfather 2 years ago
i didn't think this ending existed haha not bad
FLYNNandSEBAZ 2 years ago
???
MaffiasoJd 2 years ago
if the war of the machines is prevented then technically john cannot exist can he? for starters the time machine would have never been invented because the terminators made the time machine. and john would never meet kyle and will never send him back in time to sleep with his mother and so he will never be born.
revankader 2 years ago
iduno if theres two methods to timetravel but :
1. if you go back in time and kill your mum before you're born you dissappear (stop existing, butterfly effect) because you were never born.
2. you can kill your mum and nothing happens to the 'you' whos travelled back in time.
But this ending seems to go along with method 2. because in this ending john never has the chance to send kyle reese back in tiime to save sarah and conceive john.
hazzpro 2 years ago
I Think They sould have used this ending.
If they did
1 Sarah did not have to fight a hard life anymore
2. NIck Stall
3. Medicore Sequal T3
but if they relased it, take out the micheal Jackon, its too random
tproject19 2 years ago
MJ turned 40, yes he did, then died of drug overdose.
piemanization 2 years ago
The obvious implication of this ending would be no further sequels. Of course, on another level, this ending could never happen. Skynet would still have to be created and judgment day would still have to occur or you would have a paradox. See Novikov's self consistency principle... The probability of an event occurring, that would create a paradox, is zero. This is why the third film moves forward with judgment day, but in a horribly flawed manner. That's another story altogether though.
DDAY44j 2 years ago
If this ending stayed. there would of been no Terminator 3, No Sarah Connor Chronicles, No Terminator Salvation. Best reason to keep the Movie ending as it is is simply Finacial
ranthony023 2 years ago
wow...man I am crazy glad that someone told them this was NOT a good ending...though...3 was NOT a good continuation...and 4 was pretty lame...hmm maybe this would have been better, huh?
johndemarchi 2 years ago
the ending we live in now ....lol
bocajbee 2 years ago
Instead this ending was used for Titanic
flystatic 2 years ago
I hope they make Terminator 3...yaaaay. Im excited.
theblunttruth 2 years ago
are you serious?
phillipsouter86 2 years ago
This ending would ruin the whole movie for me.
It's just how bad and cheesy this is.
linegenrou 2 years ago
I think the point of the 3rd movie if Cameron had done it would have been Connor would've been Defense Secretary or President and traded rise of machines for the ability to win the war he foresaw!
mikedup2 2 years ago 4
cameron was in the tv show not the 3 movie
phillipsouter86 2 years ago
He means James Cameron the director of the first two films
MoralMajority 2 years ago
Although I like the original ending, the truth is if this had been the ACTUAL ending, that poor light technician would not have been yelled at by Christian Bale.
banglefaar 2 years ago 3
Here's one thing I don't get..
If the Machines are stopped, Kyle could have never gone back in time to meet Sarah to have John, therefor John wouldn't have existed because the machines have been stopped ;X
Or John had a different dad..
Dmasterman 2 years ago 3
shhhhhhh
jxwhee 2 years ago
You must open your mind!
Dmasterman 2 years ago
Please, dont gets us started on time travel!!
katyrick09 2 years ago
a paradox!
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@Dmasterman
Remember
There is no fate in which we make for ourselves
tproject19 2 years ago
Well then answer this:
John's mother gave birth to him way before his dad was born.. Which mean, if time were on track was John's dad always the same? Or did he tecnically send Kyle back to change who his dad became? :O
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@Dmasterman
i dont really know, but we dont even know if its possible to change the future. if they stopped judgement day 100% then the dark future will be erased. We dont know about kyle, if they did stop it then he should be forgotten out of thin air and people's memories.Then john still should be alive and when he grows up, he sends kyle to the past for a diffrent reason, probably not because of a terminator. but those are all theorys. but i do know where you are going. but idk100%
tproject19 2 years ago
Comment removed
Dmasterman 2 years ago
Well in this alternate ending, the dark future never came, therfor Kyle would exist, but never be sent back in time. Unless time is two different alternate realities.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@tproject19
they would never had stopped 100% cuz thats just how the things happen... so basically the world's end has to come, and john would be killed by the t - 800 as sed in the third movie ;)
McBlobby3 2 years ago
John can't have a different dad. The legend of Sarah is that she trained John to prepare for the future war. I doubt Sarah would do this without KYLE going back and informing her of the future war.
Kyle will always go back in time. Kyle will always be John's father.
This means the T-800 will always go back in time, and it's chip will always serve in the existance of Skynet. And who's to say Cyberdyne doesn't have back-up files? Judgment Day could ALWAYS happen.
that70sguy2000 2 years ago
Well it DID happen in Terminator 3.
But I kind of prefer Cameron's films and don't really consider these crappy sequels as well canon sequels.
SO, assuming this was the real end.. You're basically saying that by Kyle going back, he has created an alternate timeline, therfor the time he was from would have never changed, but he created a different time, in the Terminator 1-2 films. Which defeats the other paradox's of sorts.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
I'm not assuming Kyle created an alternate timeline and/or reality. He came from "one possible future." That one possible future is the one with Kyle as John Connor's father, and where John leads humanity, and prevails, against the machines. Kyle did not create an alternate timeline.
I could PM you a whole explanation on this. I don't have enough room :/
that70sguy2000 2 years ago
But you see, Kyle MUST'VE created an alternate timeline, otherwise it would go back to my original paradox, in which IF Judgement day was stopped for good, there would be no dark future. John would be doing what he's doing in this video. Therfor never having sent Kyle back to create him, which would ultimately not have John, in which this wouldnt' happen, nor would this scene happen, since the Machines would've won. =/
Dmasterman 2 years ago
I'm doubting the alternate timeline theory. The way I see it is that John needs to eliminate ANYTHING that will give birth to Skynet. Like many others have said, if this ending existed, John Connor wouldn't, and so wouldn't Skynet.
The way to really put it there is this:
If Skynet doesn't build the Time Displacement Equipment for the T-800 to go through, then John Connor doesn't have to send back Kyle. Which means both parties wouldn't exist later on.
Time travel is extremely confusing.
that70sguy2000 2 years ago
It's a paradox
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@Dmasterman which is why terminator 3 makes sense.
maikeru01 2 years ago
That would make it the alternate reality timeline in which not only is time written in stone, or it's inevitable, but the fact that the whole fact of sending terminators or Kyle back in time would've been pointless since the Machines WILL lose.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@Dmasterman well not terminator 3 exactly. kyle and the terminators already appeared in the past meaning they have necessarily already left the future so i think you cant have time travel without determinism. in my eyes the fact that they appeared in the past proves that you cant change the future and the time travel and the resistance were never alternate timelines at all. it was just the natural progression leading up to the same cycle. thats the only way i could ever make sense of it
maikeru01 2 years ago 2
it's the alternate reality timeline thing.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
@Dmasterman It isn't though. I mean... Reese was John's dad. That means sending him back in time wasn't a deviation from the original timeline, otherwise John wouldn't have been born and sent Reese back in time. The past and the future are written in stone because they are interdependent.
maikeru01 2 years ago
It is an alternate timeline. If this ending were true/canon/official, then Kyle DID create an alternate timeline by stopping the dark future. But this timeline is ongoing while John in the original future is still living in the dark future trying to rebuild.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
My good man, thank you for saying that. I was just about to explain how them sending anybody back to begin with had to mean that that was already predetermined that they will send it back, so it's all one universe time line all along. But you said it much better, and i agree 100%: that is the only way i can ever make sense of it.
Atheist269 2 years ago
hey, good looks buddy, and nice username! FSM 4 Lyfe!
maikeru01 2 years ago
Thanks for that i guess :), heh. What is FSM btw?
Atheist269 2 years ago
Flying Spaghetti Monster.
maikeru01 2 years ago
oh lol right
Atheist269 2 years ago
HOWEVER, if this is the case that Kyle created an alternate relatiy while another reality is already in existence and cannot change, that would mean, that sending a Terminator or Kyle back would have NEVER changed the outcome of that timeline Kyle was originally from. Which would have defeated the purpose of the time travelling thing all together.
Dmasterman 2 years ago
MJ turned 40! LOL
How random is that?
linegenrou 2 years ago
Its actually a miscalculation. Michael Jackson turned 39, not 40. He's the most famous person whose birthday falls on August 29th.
Tanat83 2 years ago
i dont care how much 3 or 4 trail behind this one, not having this ending was the best choice.
rotten tomatoes? the same website that gave forest gump 72%? c'mon 4 wasn't that bad.
therunningman09 2 years ago
I was laughing when Sarah Connor said that Michael Jackson turned 40 (he actually turned 39, this is a calculation error) at 0:23. Hoo hoo hee... long live the King.
Tanat83 2 years ago
Michael Jackson turned 40... LOL!
mahdogzbite 2 years ago
If they had had this ending, they definitely wudn't hav been able to make Terminator 3
MattayReturns 2 years ago 2
Which is why they didn't use it.
Dream23fb 2 years ago
Exactly the reason they should have used it!
sirhenryjones 2 years ago
prequel to T1 in the future
dat1337vet 2 years ago
In the 1st movie Reese said he was from "one possible future" so I suppose this ending is valid if he meant that time travel creates parallel worlds instead of causing paradoxes.
sonicboom2007 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
bulbi1 2 years ago
One day this shit will happen in real life, I garuntee you that, I mean Somethings going to wipe out the human race, either natural disaster, hells apocalypse or nuclear war
KoolJayJ 2 years ago
I disagree if people were more tolerant and intelligent and understood that hate fear primitive and would see that we are a race we should live as one we might stand a chance, while Im at it you would be able to see that any including all is a load of rubbish, an intelligent person would be able to see through the imaginative god and see the truth in science and logic.
Wowiceblitz 2 years ago
An intelligent person doesn't criticize ones belief, the way to truth and understanding is to let everyone believe what they want without hatred towards anyone.
MaffiasoJd 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
After seeing so much TSCC, it's so weird to see Linda Hamilton as Sarah Connor. I much prefer Lena Headey.
A7XRules4life 2 years ago
This is actually a pretty good ending. It would have effectively killed a sequel tho lol
cactusitude 2 years ago 5
That sequel never should have been made anyway. The 3rd one was when it just degraded into a plothole filled void of garbage.
Cornwiggle 2 years ago 2
i never saw this ending.
VeskoProductions 2 years ago
I prefer the theatrical ending... but if Cameron would have chosen this one as the original, we now wouldn´t have the shitty 3rd part and the okay 4th one... it should have ended with this! GO CAMERON! Can´t wait for AVATAR!!!
KyleReese2029 2 years ago 2
This is probably a better ending because it doesn't really leave room for a sequel.
forglegorktheork 2 years ago 2
If there wasn't a war, John wouldn't be around.
Londil 2 years ago 2
Exactly what I thought, so this ending wouldn't have made any sense because John only existed in the first place because of the war. Him still being around showed that the war still happened.
harriettewinslow 2 years ago 2
this ending is good and i like t2. but like most people picked up if the future war was stopped then resse wouldnt go back to strut his stuff with sarah and john wouldnt have been there pushing his kid on a swing
wmmpictures 2 years ago
Michael Jackson's birthday is on August 29.....why did they feel the need to wirte that in?
OrangeSodaLover 2 years ago 3
Because it's saying that things are just going on as usual.
forglegorktheork 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow thank god cameron decided to take this shit out. This would have runed the film!
ps Terminator Salvation ruled, quit whininng you little t2 kiss up bitches.
therunningman09 2 years ago
Not according to rottentomatoes jackass, so I guess it's not just us
rrrevan 2 years ago
rotten tomatoes is just a load of...well, rotten tomatoes!
oh please the critics there are so full of crap they gave the first home alone a 40%rating. because theyre run by the same whiny bitches like YOU
therunningman09 2 years ago
T4 was a piece of shit littleman -rottentomatoes is just a compilation of reviewers - and fuck home alone 1 as well - what are you 5 years old? - you're boring me
rrrevan 2 years ago
what i meant by that was rottentomatoes sucks dick at rating movies, like you. all those "reviwers" are just a bunch of retarded nerds who pick on every little detail. fuck you and fuck them both
now get out of your moms basement and go find some chick and get laid. fall in love with something else other than T2
therunningman09 2 years ago
Sure, because commenting on my response to a great sci fi film speaks highly for your active social life...
And I just did fall in love with something other than T2 - your hilarious "comebacks"
I assume you're not getting much action either - maybe we can help each other (wink)
rrrevan 2 years ago 3
nope, i dont allow a movie rating website (a horrible one at that) dictate my taste in movies.
well its nice to know something else entertains u other than t2. lol or does rotten tomatoes have to be the final judge on that?
and i really dont care what you (or rotten tomatoes) think of me.
therunningman09 2 years ago
They should of left it with the original ending and never made absolutely abominations of the last two. Could not even sit through them they were so shit.
derekfeely 2 years ago
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!
T4 was hideous
rrrevan 2 years ago
ur mom is hideous...but at least shes cheap.
therunningman09 2 years ago
since you "know", I guess that would make you cheap and have no standards whatsoever.
Way to set yourself up littleman..I mean runningman haha
rrrevan 2 years ago
wow you really have no taste in anything other than t2 do you kid?
therunningman09 2 years ago
What a hero. Sarah Connor saved humanity from Terminator 3 and Terminator Salvation!
*clap clap clap*
kvn8907 2 years ago 3
This ending is more lighthearted but there's still a darkness to it. Maybe it's just the music that played over the scene.
Threemiles236 2 years ago
If only this ending was in the original version. Terminator 3 & Salvation wouldn't have even exsisted. Those damn directors and their desire for a quick buck. Makes me sick.
rcfrandsen 2 years ago
Eh, you gotta give them a little credit. Terminator 3 and Salvation weren't good, but they certainly weren't the worst movies ever. Also, for better or worse, they were successful at making big bucks. ;-)
kvn8907 2 years ago
salvation was a flop thats why the series is up for sale
youtub1238 2 years ago
I will be fair, T3 & Salv. weren't God awful (trust me I've seen WAY worse films) but they were unnecessary. I do know the difference between unnecessary (Indy 4 & every single Disney sequel) and just plain horrible (Batman & Robin and Dragonball Evolution).
rcfrandsen 2 years ago
Terminator 2 is the total package. It makes you think, is stylish, has great acting, and stuff gets blow'd up!
Bballashotfalla 2 years ago
Honestly, they should of just went with this, and end the series (That way we wouldn't have to get that abomination known as Terminator 3).
dinoman96 2 years ago 7
And, also, terminator salvation.
God saves you from that movie......
Volgrand 2 years ago
I agree 100% I had high expectations for that movie and I left 1/2 through it because I was going to puke in my popcorn.
cmk61478 2 years ago
Original ending is better. The moment when T-800 dies is the highest emotional peak in the film. Ending like this would low it down.
loshmilosh 2 years ago
Who plays the little girl? This is a nice ending, but it would've ended the franchise.
walrus8463 2 years ago
little girl looks like mary-kate or ashely olsen
i know its not her, but still
URiiNunez 2 years ago
see my Invasion of the Bodysnatchers HAPPY ENDING vids AND my termanator 3 vid
ScrapGoldBass 2 years ago
Ending is still wrong though, John should cease to exist as well since he is a product of the future that never came.
snake2006 2 years ago
Haha! That paradox is evident regardless.
wepootheuser 2 years ago
But he's alive in present day 1997 surely?
Myonosken 2 years ago
Michael Jackson turned 40
XD
whailman 2 years ago 7
Actually he turned 39 in 1997.
gzrsux 2 years ago 4
This was an interesting ending.
Zippertheslipper 2 years ago 3
This ending is kinda screwed up to me
Osric44 2 years ago
WTF !! did she say Michael Jackson turned 40? !!!!???
SmackuSer 2 years ago
if they had used this ending there most likey wold not have been a T3 or a T4. it kinda puts a permanent end to the story.
thomas070784 2 years ago 2
Maybe, but they always could have just put it as a different time line. Still, I love this movies dark and bleak idea of the post apocalyptic world.
Zer0nite 2 years ago
michael jackson turn 40 ? wtf ? LOOOOOOOL
92epica 2 years ago
its kind of funny to think taht sky net made john conner thay made thare ownd doomb in a paradox
anoldchick 2 years ago 2
I would had liked this ending...
dickkwikkwek 2 years ago
Yeah too bad it doesn't fit know that they made T3 the way they did. I didn't really like T3. Anyone feel the same or just me?
choptop1218 2 years ago 8
yea it wasnt the same without LH! and it just plain sucked!
UltraViolet93 2 years ago
Very interesting ending. Too happy for a Terminator movie, I guess that's why they cut it out.
besticouldcomeupwith 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
MeyandPey 2 years ago 2
thats why this ending was cut
DeathgGod 2 years ago
hey... that true!
maxval54 2 years ago
grand father parodox
tihs is probably why thay cut it out
it could make you go mad thinking about it
anoldchick 2 years ago
Okay for the time line theory its rather simple, if you take two reactants in an experiment and they combine to create a product, then you have a product period. Taking away the reactants doesn't get rid of the product at this point. This is the same with the Future War and Kyle Reese, they both are the reactants, and they produce John Connor. If the Future is destroyed and Kyle is gone, that doesn't mean John ceases to be, he was already produced, hes here to stay.
yngwllm 2 years ago 9
Prefer this, instead they got greedy and had to go and ruin it by making those 2 god damn awful movies.
kakaisking 2 years ago 7
Prefer this ending than making more terminator films. I like how John's still a soldier, even if it is in politics.
Snagprophet 2 years ago 7
I believe the same, there is a timeline where John Connor it's slightly different because his father is another dude, and then when he send Kyle Reese back in time, who was in love of Sara from seeing her picture, he became the father of another child who Sarah calls John cos' of Kyle's story. So he is a different John Connor, he became leader of the ressistance because he will be preparing for that since birth.
dublindbzteam 2 years ago
I like this ending much better. It follows the rules of time travel.
York22 2 years ago
for this would disagree look at this way. whenever one goes back in time you create a branch in the river of time or alternate timeline. their are no paradoxes. With the death of the guy who invented skynet , the destruction of the lab, and destroying the chip, the protoype arm, and both terminators, in the steel mill all possible ways for skynet to be created have been destroyed. John would not cease to exist because he is an alternate John. The war doesnt happen and he becomes a senator.
York22 2 years ago
And I am a Terminator fan. A True one that understood the story behind the action.
T3 and Salvation pissed all over the first 2 films.
It's fact,deal with it and move on.
snake2006 2 years ago 2