I may fly till 6000 metres with 90-170 km/h and on distance 300 kilometres. It is carry by one man and it weights 11 kg, second man carry laptop. It's had two cameras usual camera wirt very strong zoom and termo-vision camera. It lands by autopilot, very easy to use. Look:
@zombie766, please watch your language. We have received many complaints about you. Out of respect for the other users of this channel, we will take action if you do not stop. Thanks.
actually reading from books about the vietnam war i'm really sceptical about the effectiveness of aerial reconnaisance due to the thick jungle canopy :\
but if its for an urban combat setting then it'll be invaluable
@Mr997996 You cannot hit even a flying model at 300m AGL, just forget it. It is very small, inaudible, invisible to radar and the last thing you need when it is overhead is to get enemy attention byt firing small arms because then you have 1-3min to artillery strike if the army is competent. Assault rifle range is much smaller straight up, it is very difficult to aim, and it is very hard to spot until it is in directly above. Usually untrained observer cannot even tell flight direction.
@l156a21 This pathetic UAV is for Scout Troopers to use. Different UAV has different capability. This is meant for the army for recon missions, not high altitude survellance.
I think if singapore really needs is MQ-8 Fire Scout
The UAV Helicopter is really nice as it can take off from any place
Also AH-6X Unmanned Little Bird also can, the ULB can be controlled from AH-64D Apache Longbow. Marking targets using Laser Designator, allowing the gunner from Apache fires the AGM-114K Hellfire from a safe distance
@x3Pot93 would REALLY like to see you shoot at one in a real battle. Chances are, you're goign to miss, that thing is at least 200m up there and with an average person's aim, there is bullet drop etc so you are likely to miss. Not only that, you give away your position which is probably the aim of the recce team in the first place. Best thing to do is to conceal yourself IF you see it and report back to HHQ
@fah85 The GlobalHawk will cost more then the Predator B according to reports. So why not get a UAV which can destory enemy targets immediately rather than get some infomations but you still need to wait for the renforcement to arrive to be able to do damage to the enemy? Moveover, without any gunfires the Global Hawk may be shot down at anytime which will waste more money.
@sohcherhui The GlobalHawk is capable of reaching altitude no fighter jet could reached. There's always a chance that it can be shot down. I doubt RSAF will buy globalhawk.
If I were their enemy, I will develop a radar to detect their UAV's remote controller and fire one round of mortar over ;p
LokeWaiHoeSG 1 month ago
That thing has a shit camera on it.
stalkingalizee 4 months ago
Glad the UAV got the well-deserved focus too. UAVs are the future of battlefield intel
antisisapendatang 5 months ago
it's not a toy.
uragonable21 5 months ago
Dear Santa.........
rm688 5 months ago
I love it. My baby.
cantona156 1 year ago
@flugcojg Different price range.
krbosak 1 year ago
Polish FlyEye is MUCH better!!!
I may fly till 6000 metres with 90-170 km/h and on distance 300 kilometres. It is carry by one man and it weights 11 kg, second man carry laptop. It's had two cameras usual camera wirt very strong zoom and termo-vision camera. It lands by autopilot, very easy to use. Look:
watch?v=rNuZwY2iDcM
GregorMar 1 year ago
@zombie766, please watch your language. We have received many complaints about you. Out of respect for the other users of this channel, we will take action if you do not stop. Thanks.
cyberpioneertv 1 year ago
actually reading from books about the vietnam war i'm really sceptical about the effectiveness of aerial reconnaisance due to the thick jungle canopy :\
but if its for an urban combat setting then it'll be invaluable
Ahamster1 1 year ago
lol... Now the army use toys for their war.. so cool...
MrSkullSociety 1 year ago
@MrSkullSociety they said."its far from being a toy"at 2:27
hades798 1 year ago
i tot this belongs to the air-force.
97432561 1 year ago
Flying at 460m above ground is not very high...i think the enemy can bring it down with just an assault rifle...
Mr997996 1 year ago
@Mr997996 agreed!
playboyesmail 1 year ago
@Mr997996 You cannot hit even a flying model at 300m AGL, just forget it. It is very small, inaudible, invisible to radar and the last thing you need when it is overhead is to get enemy attention byt firing small arms because then you have 1-3min to artillery strike if the army is competent. Assault rifle range is much smaller straight up, it is very difficult to aim, and it is very hard to spot until it is in directly above. Usually untrained observer cannot even tell flight direction.
krbosak 1 year ago
MQ-9 Reapers are better than this pathetic UAV
l156a21 1 year ago
@l156a21 This pathetic UAV is for Scout Troopers to use. Different UAV has different capability. This is meant for the army for recon missions, not high altitude survellance.
fah85 1 year ago
I think if singapore really needs is MQ-8 Fire Scout
The UAV Helicopter is really nice as it can take off from any place
Also AH-6X Unmanned Little Bird also can, the ULB can be controlled from AH-64D Apache Longbow. Marking targets using Laser Designator, allowing the gunner from Apache fires the AGM-114K Hellfire from a safe distance
zhiheng2005 1 year ago
Hope u guys can improve on the Aerial vehicle...make it invisible so that the enemy can't see it, or make it smaller in size...
1028Merlion 1 year ago
Video not really clear ;/ and if the ememy sees it, they're gonna shoot it down since u can see it so easily lol ._.
x3Pot93 1 year ago
@x3Pot93 would REALLY like to see you shoot at one in a real battle. Chances are, you're goign to miss, that thing is at least 200m up there and with an average person's aim, there is bullet drop etc so you are likely to miss. Not only that, you give away your position which is probably the aim of the recce team in the first place. Best thing to do is to conceal yourself IF you see it and report back to HHQ
sowarabinomai 1 year ago
more can be done on the camo of the soldier
dexterssk 1 year ago
nice.at last a vid bout UAVs
TheCyberGamerz 1 year ago
Do you have a 3 kill-streak contract to go along with it? XD
babyshawn21994 1 year ago
Singapore should get M/RQ-1 Predator or MQ-9 Reaper as armed UAV
zhiheng2005 1 year ago
@zhiheng2005 A bit too much firepower. Maybe somewhere in the future, the SAF will have a armed UAV. If me, for now, I will settle for a GlobalHawk.
fah85 1 year ago
Comment removed
sohcherhui 1 year ago
@fah85 The GlobalHawk will cost more then the Predator B according to reports. So why not get a UAV which can destory enemy targets immediately rather than get some infomations but you still need to wait for the renforcement to arrive to be able to do damage to the enemy? Moveover, without any gunfires the Global Hawk may be shot down at anytime which will waste more money.
sohcherhui 1 year ago
@sohcherhui The GlobalHawk is capable of reaching altitude no fighter jet could reached. There's always a chance that it can be shot down. I doubt RSAF will buy globalhawk.
fah85 1 year ago
@fah85 The RSAF have already bought the GlobalHawk. It was on display in the Airshow 2010 in March.
sohcherhui 1 year ago
@sohcherhui er, dude, singapore has no GlobalHawk. It's the U.s air force's one.
charlesloh 1 year ago
@fah85 RQ-7 Shadow also not bad
zhiheng2005 1 year ago
@MrJurongwest Adding missiles doesn't make it a jet. Dumbass.
ZzdeathangelzZ 1 year ago
@ZzdeathangelzZ i can see why people hated you so much.
Zeltrex95 1 year ago
@Zeltrex95 true.
theproisback 1 year ago
@Zeltrex95 so true
TheCyberGamerz 1 year ago
big boys toy. ^_^
XIII2010 1 year ago