so why is it the mother is seen to be the primary carer of the children, taking them to the dentists, picking them up from school etc, because the father has a full time job supporting them all and can't do it himself! so much for the primary carer laws, they are just another weapon to use against fathers.
All these men are fighting for an assumption 'A child must have the right to have 50/50 contact with both parents' that has no sense! Because A RIGHT CANNOT BE ASSUMED AND ENFORCED!Its not a matter of time a child spends with the. ENFORCEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS DEPRIVE PARTIES OF THEIR RIGHTS!That's what you guys are fighting for, because obviously you cannot get a child's contact through peaceful measures like moral and financial support.
oh god ...please...beacuse this kind of think woman and mothers suffers a lot childrens and fathers! moral and financial support???? god help us!!! how about oposite situation and you give a father finacial and moral support without seeing your child?? a? stupid bitch!!!
@JayZea48 don't put labels on people you don't know - it is not legal. I've got 2 master degrees, speak 3 languages, work, own my home and in happy relationship. Desperate degraded men like those who separate mothers with children are just of no interest for me. With your comments you just prove again and again that you are agressive, spermotoxicoze affected attention seekers.
@JayZea48 My father is an architect and has done a lot for the city where I was born, and I am proud of him for what he has done in his profession. When I see these miserable 'men' who cannot afford dignity because they have a mortgage, who are not interested in affection because they have porno, who would deprive thier children of mother because they cannot take care of the family, all I can say that you cannot call yourself human beings.
"The best interests of the child are to be considered paramount..."
But what are those best interests? There's no definition; it should be explicitly stated what, in general, those best interests are, and that statement should include the assumption that a father is equally important in the child's upbringing. From that position, good cause should have to be evidenced before the child's interests can be read to mean separation from the father.
hey we been going through this in america for decades but we have child support where if you lose your job you go to jail and pay them not just what you owe butpay them for room and board after you find a job in jail for minimum wage all this even though you commit no crime
so why is it the mother is seen to be the primary carer of the children, taking them to the dentists, picking them up from school etc, because the father has a full time job supporting them all and can't do it himself! so much for the primary carer laws, they are just another weapon to use against fathers.
mansuka1 2 months ago
the 1st fatass blond hoe was a witch.
JayZea48 6 months ago
All these men are fighting for an assumption 'A child must have the right to have 50/50 contact with both parents' that has no sense! Because A RIGHT CANNOT BE ASSUMED AND ENFORCED!Its not a matter of time a child spends with the. ENFORCEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS DEPRIVE PARTIES OF THEIR RIGHTS!That's what you guys are fighting for, because obviously you cannot get a child's contact through peaceful measures like moral and financial support.
OlinaOlya 10 months ago
@OlinaOlya
oh god ...please...beacuse this kind of think woman and mothers suffers a lot childrens and fathers! moral and financial support???? god help us!!! how about oposite situation and you give a father finacial and moral support without seeing your child?? a? stupid bitch!!!
slavkomajkic 8 months ago 3
@slavkomajkic ahh dont worry, thats just a single lesbian.
JayZea48 6 months ago
@JayZea48 don't put labels on people you don't know - it is not legal. I've got 2 master degrees, speak 3 languages, work, own my home and in happy relationship. Desperate degraded men like those who separate mothers with children are just of no interest for me. With your comments you just prove again and again that you are agressive, spermotoxicoze affected attention seekers.
OlinaOlya 6 months ago
@OlinaOlya peace? morals? you? hah! better talk terrorism...
JayZea48 6 months ago
@JayZea48 My father is an architect and has done a lot for the city where I was born, and I am proud of him for what he has done in his profession. When I see these miserable 'men' who cannot afford dignity because they have a mortgage, who are not interested in affection because they have porno, who would deprive thier children of mother because they cannot take care of the family, all I can say that you cannot call yourself human beings.
OlinaOlya 6 months ago
"The best interests of the child are to be considered paramount..."
But what are those best interests? There's no definition; it should be explicitly stated what, in general, those best interests are, and that statement should include the assumption that a father is equally important in the child's upbringing. From that position, good cause should have to be evidenced before the child's interests can be read to mean separation from the father.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago 5
"State Sanction Kidnap" is right where it's at.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
hey we been going through this in america for decades but we have child support where if you lose your job you go to jail and pay them not just what you owe butpay them for room and board after you find a job in jail for minimum wage all this even though you commit no crime
tommypdunn 1 year ago 2
thank you for making this documentary.
i can only hope more parents and children will rise up against the lawyers and judges who destroy children and families and profit from the carnage.
-chris hobbs
WhyJudgeLittle 3 years ago 2
please see "Dante's right to be love and protect by his dad" this need to stop!! please for the love of our children!
jerrdan1966 4 years ago 2