The FACTS ARE.Obama and Biden voted FOR the Bridge to Nowhere.The bill did not pass and went through 181 amendments.Then Tom Coburn put forth the "Perfecting Amendment" which diverted the money from the "Bridge to Nowhere" to rebuilding the Twin Spans Bridge in Louisiana that was destroyed by hurricane Kahtrina and on that vote Obama and Biden VOTED NO...So in effect Obama and Biden voted twice FOR the Bridge to Nowhere and Voted NO to rebuilding the Twin Spans Bridge.TRY TO EXPLAIN THAT!
Earmarks make strange bedfellows. And it was Alaska's Republican Senator Ted Stevens who opposed diverting the New Orleans bridge funds and proposed the BTN in the first place. After that earmarks make their usual mess of things. What Palin is making plain is her mastery of having things both ways. She got the appropriation for Alaska yet retained bragging rights for nixing the project. Kiniving b*tch. Oh those photop-ops of her visinting the troops are at a Kuwait border station not inside Iraq
Bicycle paths in the age of global warming? Peace Museum in a country awash in military/war museums? A visitor center for a state devastated by Bush's Katrina disaster to encourage economic growth? A hospital - any hospital in a country crying for health care? Sounds like the man has a good sense of financial priority.
Great bumper-sticker soundbite. I'm sure any debate the Republicans will partake in will be nothing but that. The choice is clear: More Busshit or Something Completely Different. In my mine anything but the former will be a vast improvement.
Palin cut her states earmark requests in Half last year. Lets see what some of Obama's earmarks went for.$12 MILLION for bicycle paths,$450,00.00 for the International Peace Museum,$500,000.00 for a baseball stadium,$392,000,00 for a visitors center in Louisiana,and ARE YOU READY--ONE MILLION DOLLARS for the hospital his wife works at.
Obama did not make Earmarks a focal point of his campaign, McCain did. McCain and Palin are lying about her record which is a character issue. I wouldn't have cared less if McCain didn't say anything about Earmarks or said Palin is going to change her ways or even said good for her. But instead he lied. Earmarks are a tiny bit of the total budget. Do I hate them? Probably most of them. How do you get rid of them? Probably through a line-item veto which I support McCain's view on.
Interesting because Palin is the only candidate which supports the project. Both the independent and democratic candidates opposed the Bridge to Nowhere.
Earmarks are not voted on individually. It comes on the funding bills which involve tons of small parts to it which are negotiated. Additionally, the point here is not that she was for it or against it but that McCain and Palin are lying about her record on it.
OK so we know what earmarks are.Now explain why Obama voted for 113 of them and together with Biden they have asked for earmarks totaling over a BILLION DOLLARS.Palin HAS NO VOTE IN THE SENATE.Then explain who has championed earmark reform and has authored NO earmarks.Vote Mccain.
Obama did not make Earmarks a focal point of his campaign, McCain did. McCain and Palin are lying about her record which is a character issue. I wouldn't have cared less if McCain didn't say anything about Earmarks or said Palin is going to change her ways or even said good for her. But instead he lied. Earmarks are a tiny bit of the total budget. Do I hate them? Probably most of them. How do you get rid of them? Probably through a line-item veto which I support McCain's view on.
Earmarks have become so pervasive in congress it's virtually impossible to vote on anything WITHOUT earmarks. That's why they have to go. In the meantime democracy goes on despite earmarks.
Obama and Biden voted for BTN because it was earmarked to needed funding. The approved in spite of being against BTN to get the other issues passed. And these US senators were in a different position that Ms. Palin who, as Governor, was the direct recipient of funding. A lot of good this boondoggle would do a Senator from Chicago. More proof earmarks have to go.
The FACTS ARE.Obama and Biden voted FOR the Bridge to Nowhere.The bill did not pass and went through 181 amendments.Then Tom Coburn put forth the "Perfecting Amendment" which diverted the money from the "Bridge to Nowhere" to rebuilding the Twin Spans Bridge in Louisiana that was destroyed by hurricane Kahtrina and on that vote Obama and Biden VOTED NO...So in effect Obama and Biden voted twice FOR the Bridge to Nowhere and Voted NO to rebuilding the Twin Spans Bridge.TRY TO EXPLAIN THAT!
66barry 3 years ago
Earmarks make strange bedfellows. And it was Alaska's Republican Senator Ted Stevens who opposed diverting the New Orleans bridge funds and proposed the BTN in the first place. After that earmarks make their usual mess of things. What Palin is making plain is her mastery of having things both ways. She got the appropriation for Alaska yet retained bragging rights for nixing the project. Kiniving b*tch. Oh those photop-ops of her visinting the troops are at a Kuwait border station not inside Iraq
panchovilllla 3 years ago
Bicycle paths in the age of global warming? Peace Museum in a country awash in military/war museums? A visitor center for a state devastated by Bush's Katrina disaster to encourage economic growth? A hospital - any hospital in a country crying for health care? Sounds like the man has a good sense of financial priority.
panchovilllla 3 years ago
A nods as good as a wink to a blind horse.Bring on the Debates.
66barry 3 years ago
Great bumper-sticker soundbite. I'm sure any debate the Republicans will partake in will be nothing but that. The choice is clear: More Busshit or Something Completely Different. In my mine anything but the former will be a vast improvement.
panchovilllla 3 years ago
Palin cut her states earmark requests in Half last year. Lets see what some of Obama's earmarks went for.$12 MILLION for bicycle paths,$450,00.00 for the International Peace Museum,$500,000.00 for a baseball stadium,$392,000,00 for a visitors center in Louisiana,and ARE YOU READY--ONE MILLION DOLLARS for the hospital his wife works at.
66barry 3 years ago
Obama did not make Earmarks a focal point of his campaign, McCain did. McCain and Palin are lying about her record which is a character issue. I wouldn't have cared less if McCain didn't say anything about Earmarks or said Palin is going to change her ways or even said good for her. But instead he lied. Earmarks are a tiny bit of the total budget. Do I hate them? Probably most of them. How do you get rid of them? Probably through a line-item veto which I support McCain's view on.
DarylZero13 3 years ago
Lets try this a different way.You say that Sarah Palin lied about taking this earmark for the bridge to nowhere.PROVE IT.
66barry 3 years ago
Interesting because Palin is the only candidate which supports the project. Both the independent and democratic candidates opposed the Bridge to Nowhere.
DarylZero13 3 years ago
Fact is Obama and Biden voted FOR the Bridge to Nowhere.LOOK IT UP.
66barry 3 years ago
Earmarks are not voted on individually. It comes on the funding bills which involve tons of small parts to it which are negotiated. Additionally, the point here is not that she was for it or against it but that McCain and Palin are lying about her record on it.
DarylZero13 3 years ago
OK so we know what earmarks are.Now explain why Obama voted for 113 of them and together with Biden they have asked for earmarks totaling over a BILLION DOLLARS.Palin HAS NO VOTE IN THE SENATE.Then explain who has championed earmark reform and has authored NO earmarks.Vote Mccain.
66barry 3 years ago
Obama did not make Earmarks a focal point of his campaign, McCain did. McCain and Palin are lying about her record which is a character issue. I wouldn't have cared less if McCain didn't say anything about Earmarks or said Palin is going to change her ways or even said good for her. But instead he lied. Earmarks are a tiny bit of the total budget. Do I hate them? Probably most of them. How do you get rid of them? Probably through a line-item veto which I support McCain's view on.
DarylZero13 3 years ago
Earmarks have become so pervasive in congress it's virtually impossible to vote on anything WITHOUT earmarks. That's why they have to go. In the meantime democracy goes on despite earmarks.
panchovilllla 3 years ago
Obama and Biden voted for BTN because it was earmarked to needed funding. The approved in spite of being against BTN to get the other issues passed. And these US senators were in a different position that Ms. Palin who, as Governor, was the direct recipient of funding. A lot of good this boondoggle would do a Senator from Chicago. More proof earmarks have to go.
panchovilllla 3 years ago
What a wretched lying twit... Palin's a lying imbecile
AlliedSaint 3 years ago