Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Did anybody notice the sudden rise of the new strain of weed called kush: stronger then regular weed and endorsed by a lot of rappers... and the funny part is the rise of this kush started after america went to war in the hinduKUSH

  • i love this guy

  • What's up, iloveponteporn?

    NO MENTION OF THE JEWS!

    What's up with that?

  • @awamoriwhiskey I think their ego is big enough without me further stroking it lol

  • @iloveponteporn

    It's not about their ego.

    It's about the necessity of Naming the Jew so people can better understand The Global Parasite.

  • That was A-w-e-s-o-m-e!

  • ГЕНИАЛЬНО!!!

  • Once again you nail it. The force is trong with you.

  • That is why I could NEVER make policy. One has to have steel in one's veins. I don't I'm the sheeple BUT what I do is blab away ABOUT policy if I don't make it. I am against war as policy in this era, unlike the time of another historical era. War is MUCH too risky. TOO many variables to create chaos too many powers now have the ultimate weapon. That weapon makes war OBSOLETE. We simply cannot risk that some other nutbag even here will use it. If they do the human race faces extinction.

  • @natalierosen I'd agree one would have to be a little detached for these policies to be installed, though I suppose this detachment would be achieved by selfishly focusing on, and only on, the bigger, long term picture. One must remain on top, whatever the human cost. War is always a plan C option though, only instigated when covertly overthrowing the hostile government isn't possible. That said, after every war there are tremendous gains, and our Anglo-American NATO empire only gets stronger.

  • Yes, I know that history and the US involvement in propping up Sadam and eventually Sadam using his weapons on us. There is nothing wrong in my opinion with nation states wanting hegemony. It's natural..it's survival even. What I CANNOT take is the crushing, destroying and dismembering of innocents the so called "collateral damage." That's what gets me no matter who does it.

  • @natalierosen You're right, it is natural. Survival of the fittest and if you're not on top - you're under someone else. I do accept loss of life is hard to justify, even harder when the loss is innocent, but, rightly or wrongly, its a question of does that loss surpass the gain? In strategic and tactical terms, the advantage gained far absolved the sacrifice made, although this un-moral thinking is very hard to comprehend in non-strategic term. Logic, very often, is out of sync with compassion

  • Interesting -- not being in the milieu means I could never really know. However, what you say makes some sense in that I could never understand how those SO smart and SO informed and who know that part of the world SO well could ever on planet earth not know that breaking the antique shop would create chaos among the 2 or 3 entities vying for power. SOMEONE somewhere had to know that. I understand power BUT ALL of our guys lives and others what mess. I could NEVER be in a position of decision

  • @natalierosen Oh they understand the area and ethnics of Iraq to a T! It was the British elite who drew the plans and invented the country of Iraq, on land what was originally persia. Years later the CIA who bankrolled Saddam to power, although back then he was a valuable asset, someone willing to wage war on Iran whilst we make trillions selling him arms. He did, eventually, get a big to big for his boots though, and so, we had no choice but to invade, remove him and run the place ourselves

  • @natalierosen We knew every single detail about Iraq and her occupants.We had the knowledge of if a change of leadership has to happen, we knew, in depth, the influential knock on effect it would have to the ethnics groups in the region, and what steps to take prevent it hindering the take over. As the last change was done by military force, the best option was to manipulate the ethnics to fight themselves whilst we conquer both of them. I agree loss of life is sad, but, sadly its inevitable

  • Parts I find fascinatingly interesting. Other parts of it, maybe my mind is limited in just how much of a maze like conspiracy is possible. Is it REALLY possible to keep SO many who would be necessary to create this intricate web of the HUGE HORROR that was 911, war, tactical reasons for it, banks, money machine for war & put it over on 300 million people without anyone figuring it out except a few who represent maybe .01% of the population? In other words show me PROOF i.e. show me the $

  • @natalierosen Of course its possible. Its known as compartalization, people, staff only operate on a need to know basis. Therefore, whilst many many people will of had a hand in developing complex systems and developing elaborate false flag attacks, none of them know, through compartalization, the full picture and the full extent their actions have. Its only when you sit back and analyse the whole thing you realise whats going on. I admire it. If I was top chief, I'd being the same thing.

  • @iloveponteporn okay even IF comparmentalization figures into something for that compartimentalization to work it ALL has to fit together perfectly. Doubtful VERY doubtful. Hey we cannot even succeed where we MUST succeed let alone doing something so massive and no one but no one reveals anything. Still doubtful. As I said show me the money not just the inference...better still maybe I don't want to know such a HORRENDOUS act like. Too much to bear

  • @natalierosen You have made a few assumptions there my friend. Firstly, why is it doubtful that things will fit together? It only becomes doubtful if variables you don't control are included in a plan, whatever the plan may be. Control the variables and you control the outcome. Simple. Second, you assume 'we cannot even succeed where we MUST succeed' ?, be specific about what you assume ''we MUST succeed' refers to, and I will indicate how much of a priority 'MUST' actually is... :)

  • @iloveponteporn The military plans things all the time and things go wrong...look at Iraq .SO much insurgency not calculated into the variable. People die those people get mad...too many human variables. humans are not robots nothing is fool proof. I don't think. then again what do I know. I thought there were WMDs' in Iraq., who knew it was a ruse. I get things wrong ALL the time. Glad I'm not in the pentagon or in any position of power. I'd be a nervous wreck!

  • @natalierosen It appears you've been caught up in the illusion that more insurgency in Iraq wasn't part of the plan. Increased insurgency after the invasion was wanted, and planned for. It only takes a few well placed agents in the shi'ite and sunni religions to manipulate them to fight against each other, whilst we nestle in setting up banks/bases and profiting from their oil. Pretty soon all out civil war will be achieved, and the last phase of 'divide and conquer' can be put in place.

  • I don't know. I like some of ponteporn...it's fun and one learns something but to say that our own government EVEN under Bush whom I loathed were involved in a conspiracy to commit 9/11 ... can't buy it. I think IF we wanted to invade Afghanistan it surely came in handy but in reality we invaded IRAQ! Why? We could have kept at Afghanistan and gotten bin laden at the same time and be done with it. The cost of Iraq has been ENORMOUS!

  • @natalierosen I can't see why its that hard to believe who was behind 911. Set fire to some buildings, blame someone else and then claim on the insurance. Happens all the time, its just the towers happened on a much bigger scale, or a 4billion dollar insurance policy to be exact. And with the scapegoat being a CIA operated group of fighters originally recruited to fight the Russians, the plan really becomes foolproof.

  • @iloveponteporn with Iraq, they was about to start trading oil in the euro, so we had to hasten our invasion and protect the whole petro-dollar agreement, because aslong as oil is traded in dollars our nations will remain rich. Of course, invading Iraq had its other tactical advantages aswell, namely its strategic positioning for future domination of the middle east, and its money spinning oil wells.

  • @iloveponteporn In episode2 of my series I explain how war makes money, so although the media portrays enormous costs involved with fighting the war in Iraq, with the multi-billion pound weapon contracts, and then the multi-billion pound infrastructure contracts, someone is making a hell of alot of money out of creating these wars, its just unfortunate it isn't me !

  • Thats what I like about us northerners we say it as it is. Dead on fucking target lad & no shit in between....

  • @ALBIONTYKE Thats it mate, always tell it like it is...

  • You're not putting this together yourself. That's not a dig, I want in...

  • @TheHighlanderEst84 what can you bring to the table!?

  • i never thought i'd be tought so much by someone who sounded like a townie ;0

  • @AmericanHero911 its strategy and logic what teach you the knowledge my friend, its just, this time round, it appears, they were relayed and given to you by someone who sounds like a townie lol

  • wow, well done. This a great summary of why we are actually in Afghanistan. It would be great to actually have the sort of people that go to 'serve for their country' to know, in simple terms, why they are there.

  • @meeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh To 'serve your country', is a massive spectrum and can be defined in countless ways. In a sense, they are 'serving their country', by furthering the Anglo-American NATO empire and conquering new lands. Its what soldiers are for and its what there trained to do. Whilst I admire the soldiers efforts, they chose to sign up and fight and they get paid for doing so respectively. If they want to know the 'real' reasons of wars, they should of opted a career in banking instead :)

  • @iloveponteporn well said. I couldnt agree more

  • we need more of these, i can't believe thay don't go viral, oh year lemmings don;t like knowing they are lemmings :/

  • @rhyskempen Totally agree mate, they should go viral, its a shame I only get like two views a day, but oh well, its better than none lol

  • @iloveponteporn Yes it is bizzare. I have linked it in a few forums...

    I wonder if the views are reduced on such items to make it seem as though it is not as popular as it is.

  • We're not all stupid, just the majority of us!

  • @messengercouriergirl The vast majority of us lol

  • Good work fella, funny as fuck.

  • @DeleteTheWeak Cheers mate, thankyou :)

  • Never underestimate the stupidity of idiots

  • @TSMK900 .....as you'll always be astounded by how stupid some people can actually be lol

  • @iloveponteporn Your a moron. Why don't you make any more videos on NWO...why not on feemasons and knight templars and shit????

    MAKE MORE VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!

  • @TSMK900 Mate, if I could make my investigative films as fast as I could wank, believe me, you'd be so snowed under and spoilt for choice, n I'd be so happy because I'd have more films out there than just a measly six.

    It may not look it, from the humour and slapdish style of edit, but my films do take an massive amount of my time to research and put together, and time unfortunately, is something I never never have. I have so many more topics I will/want to cover, its just, no idea when...

  • lol,thats how a brit describes defeat,we didnt exactly lose that war but we didnt fucking win it either.lmfao

  • @frenchfrog1979 You made me laugh with that my friend! well spotted!, although you have to agree... I wasn't going to explain it any other way lol

  • Superb

  • @stan633 Thankyou :)

  • As a previous idiot American I loved this video....I could listen to this guy for hours...good thing I spent a few years in the UK...lol I already knew most of this but it still was VERY entertaining...the most rediculous thing about all of this is that America has the most oil in the world! So why the fuck are we invading other countries?!

  • @santomon07 Thankyou for your kind words mate, pleased you're liking my films.To answer your question, the fact that America has the highest oil reserves in the world is irelevent, as we don't invade countries based on a country's oil amounts. Sure, one countries oil reserves and its potential profits may influence the priority and the number it stands on the invasion list, but that country would of been 'invaded' if it had oil reserves or not, either by political force or through military might

  • 3;40, the cheeky fuckers lol

  • @bipbipandthebippers They did have some cheek like....

  • "never underestimate the stupidity of idiots" You mean the americans LOL. Keep up the good work !!

  • @commodore64738 Well not just the Americans but yeh, that does cover a hell of alot of them haha

  • Nice one well said !!!!!!

  • @cheeki81 Thankyou :)

  • great job ,thats really the truth.

  • @royaltanha I wouldn't of told it any other way...

  • Brilliant mate , keep up the good work..

  • @ViperWK Thankyou :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more