Umm everybody on here is stupid what the heck all these men on here talking about she cheated i dont know if he didnt cheat either its he said she said stuff somethin caused her to go cheat on him was he paying her any attention nobody knows what went on in their house hold all of you people are going by what the internet said and how do you people know how much money she has you don't live with her your just going by what your reading and my opinion is he shouldn't have got custody wether she
jeez ana you're wayyyy off the rails on this one. Should the cheated-on husband/father with the job move closer to help accommodate the stay at home mother? ....giimmmeeeaabbrreaakk....
How can this bitch say that the cheating spouse shouldn't effect the ruling of who gets full custody? That says something about the wifes character, and that she has no integrity. Furthermore, they might have been discriminatory because she had a terminally ill disease, but how many fucking fathers are screwed everyday when their their kids are taken away from them, and they did nothing to deserve it. I hope this women gets a taste of what its like to lose in court as a father.
@nick42701 It shouldn't matter NOW, i.e. when the custody battle is completely over with. And even during, why should it really matter? It doesn't change anything for their situations. The rest you're just guessing at, and you even seem upset over details we don't have.
If you think I'm guessing about the corruption in family court and their mission to plunder fathers, then you need to do a little research. It's so blatantly obvious, but no one really knows much about it. Most people don't know that the Bar Association controls the family court system, and that the majority of the Bar Association is made up of feminists. Courts are completely biased against fathers, and people are so accustomed to it, no wonder they throw a fit when a father wins
@nick42701 So basically because of some shit that has absolutely nothing to do with the case portrayed, you think the father should get the kids. And that is despite how they already live with the mom, would have to move far away to go to the father, and the mom, the person soon DYING, would barely have any chance to see them.
Frankly, you're a moron, and you did get upset over irrelevant shit you brought up for stupid reasons.
I wouldn't expect someone as small minded as you to understand what I'm trying to say. The father moved to Chicago because of his job, which is explained in follow up stories. The mother is the one who CHEATED on him. She was the one who decided to ruin the relationship. Just because she has cancer, doesn't mean she should get the kids. How many cases do you think there are of fathers who develope cancer that never get to see their kids, probably hundreds.
@nick42701 So basically you're enraged because of whatever previous personal experience that happened to you, and now you're going for a little catharsis by pretending this situation is somehow similar to what you went through.
Face facts: she had custody. She wasn't winning custody because of her cancer. She lost it because of some arbitrary decision by a third party.
Your little crusade for fathers is irrelevant, and you look like a damn fool trying to shoehorn it into this.
It's not just what I went through, but what 1000's of fathers go through everytime they have a custody hearing. It was n't JUST because she had cancer. Don't make it out to be so simple. It's a lot more complicated than that. And as I said previously, I wouldn't expect you to understand. All you would have to do is try and research the subject a bit to see what really happens in family court. I can tell you're someone who has never gone through child custody issues
and for that reason alone, I can't figure out why you're trying to prove me wrong. If you haven't lived it, then don't act like you know what's going on. I'm sure you couldn't reccite ONE general statute when it comes to the guidelines that most judges abide by. I bet you've never even been through divorce. I'm sure you're not paying excessive mandated amounts of child support. You're the one who looks like a fool my friend, because of your blatant ignorance to this subject.
@usucdik "She lost it because of some arbitrary decision by a third party." You don't know it was arbitrary but you'd like to think it was.
Fact: You know less about the case than both the judge and the psychiatrist evaluating it and yes seem to think your uninformed opinion is the better answer.
I'm not trying to be insulting but it baffles me that people who hear one side of the story and have just a glancing view of the case seem to think their opinions right.
Maybe you need to take a step back and look at the BIGGER picture. This case got blown up because the parent who lost the children, happened to be the mother. Do you think it would've been publicized if it was the other way around? If you do, you're an even bigger idiot than I initially suspected. And another thing, the kids haven't been living with the mother that long. They're better off with the father, get that through your thick head.
custody. You don't think it's weird that the public has this pre-conceived notion that a father should NEVER have full custody and should ALWAYS remain the non-custodial parent? I bet you also don't know that three quarters of a century ago, fathers were actually awarded custody more than mothers were. It wasnt until the feminist movement that those rules started to change. So yea, I'm glad this father got his kids, good on him.
You are packing a load of rage and taking it out on negative judgments on those you don't even know, and calling them nasty names. This reply is NOT meant as an insult, though you will obviously take it that way.
Someone has to tell you that this kind of thinking and behaviour is violent and sick. Get help please for your own sake and the sake of others who have to deal with you. It is almost scarry to read your rant so full of hate & rage
Sorry, I don't take your comment as an insult, but I've been studying the family court system now for well over 6 years. I've you want to hear something that might change your mind, look up one of the leading men on the forefront of fathers rights, Dr. Stephen Baskerville. He's a doctor of law and political science, and he's an advocate of the biggest fathers right group in America. I'm not full of hate and rage, just frustration, for the way fathers are portrayed in this country.
Sorry, I don't take your comment as an insult, but I've been studying the family court system now for well over 6 years. I've you want to hear something that might change your mind, look up one of the leading men on the forefront of fathers rights, Dr. Stephen Baskerville. He's a doctor of law and political science, and he's an advocate of the biggest fathers right group in America. I'm not full of hate and rage, just frustration, for the way fathers are portrayed in this country
and this is the start of the downfall of hetero marriages once again. Personality, the minute you cheat, that tells the other person that hes not good enough. What's funny is that you hear alot of them complaining about protecting the word marriage, when they can't even keep their own marriage together.
The kids will end up resenting the dad for taking away the last days they have with their mom. He's eventually going to have full custody by default anyway. Let them have their time with her.
the father is going to have custody eventually anyway, by denying his children the last few years of their mothers life.... well.... they are going to hate him for it when they're old enough to google their mums name.
Now that all facts are in, TYT should make a new video to apologize for poor journalism and bias positions they got on this case. I doubt they will, but you never know... They might actually stand up to what they say and seperate themselves from the same practices that some right wing medias use which are to invent stories, cover only 1 side and never retract no matter how foolish their statements were.
@CrossTheGrigori The only thing I would say about that is most people on YouTube don't look up both sides of anything. This place can be a cesspool of stupid, and I lumped you in with the rest of them. Apparently unfairly, but there you have it. Believe me, this is probably the happiest I'll ever feel about being called on something.
ana is acting a bit ignorant here. think about what the hell do think cancer affects have on your body!? most ppl cant even move after chemotherapy, the treatment for many forms of cancer deteriorate your health in ways that affect your day to day lifestyle dramatically..this is kind of a duh point im making but its as if ana has put little to no thought behind the ramification of what cancer can and its treatment can affect the way you live your life.
@CrossTheGrigori Hold on, there. How do you know she went behind anyone's back? Do you know the specifics of her affairs? Do you know one damn thing about any of the people involved beyond what was presented here? Probably not. I don't know shit, either. Don't judge unless you know what you're talking about.
When these kids grow up, they are going to HATE their father for taking the last 1-2 years of the mother's life from them. Nice counterproductive bullshit, you fucking jerk.
this is crazy.. if it was reversed no one would give a damn. if a father had colon cancer cheated on his wife and was a stay at home day they wouldn't think twice about giving the kids to the mother. she is just making a uproar because she lost costudy.
I wouldn't be surprised if this sort of thing happens everyday. We don't know the whole story. I am sure they had reason to give primary custody to the father, we're basing things on what ABC shows us and what Time is telling us from what is apparently just the mother's side of the story.
Push comes to shove, the mom should just move to Chicago and the dad should push his issues aside and work something out so his children can have access to their ailing mother.
@z0mgz0rs that does not matter how would you feel if you were very ill and someone took your kids away. at the least she should have shared custody of the kids.
@topgun685 SHE cheated. From the information given to us, she caused this marriage to collapse. She doesn't even have a job. In reality, you do what's best for the children, and the father is definitely the right (and moral) choice here.
@z0mgz0rs - you know what? your complete lack of compassion, sensitivity and awareness towards those who are suffering makes me think that you need to endure some big time hardship yourself - and then maybe - just maybe - you will be able understand that judgements and ignorance have no place at all in life, certainly not where others are concerned. No one needs anybody's opinions - they need love and understanding - both of which you seem to lack. Grow up and get a heart.
No clue about what the custody decision should have been, but I agree it would be an upright and admirable thing for the dad to do to move closer to the mom for the sake of everyone. Hope that is what happens.
That's horrible.. to take a womans children away when she is struggling with something as horrible as cancer, I mean I do think the father should have gotten the kids yes, because he has a job and what not. I just kinda think he did it to be cruel, what man would really do that to a woman? Whether they're fighting or whatever I think it's horrible to take a womans kids away from them. I think he did it out of cruelty not for the sake of the children.
@britawni Let's turn the question over : What kind of cruel and selfish woman does this :
- I might be on my last days on this planet... Let's cheat and not consider that it will break my family apart.
- I'm losing a custody battle, I'll throw in accusations of abuse even know I was with a medical staff during the entire time which would've noticed it.
- I lost the custody battle... Let's get public pitty on the media.
There's no way anyone would want to stay with someone who cheated...
@anthonygrg I completely disagree. Remember when TYT did the story about the man who lost custody of his kids just because he as agnostic? Custody battles are shitty no matter if you're a man or woman.
I think females don't know the extent of marriage, and what it really means. You let feelings dictate your outcome and forget that you're only human so you can't 100% trust your feelings, but you do so. Once the marriage is ruined and you're on your own, you wonder how you get in bad you got yourself in terrible circumstances.
Like, to see her succumb to it? I don't know. It's really not fair, but the damage of seeing one's mother fade away may be too much for such young little girls. Life is really unpredictable.
With that said, dude needs to man up and try to move closer. True, she was unfaithful, but everyone makes mistakes. It's quite possible this sickness pushed them further apart, so she sought attention elsewhere... We just can't know, and it's not really fair to judge.
Absurd.. The man has a job, and is providing for his unfaithful ex-wife and his children.
Depending on his career, jobs do not grow on trees. Where as every town/city in america has a hospital. She needs to take responsibility and move closer to him.
Lets keep it real, man gets cheated on by a women, then divorces the women and has to leave his kids with said women, AND has to pay for the living expenses of this women?
Alright, I found it hard to pay attention towards the last minute or so, but from what I've gathered...yes, it is very sad that this lady is losing custody of her kids, but as everyone's saying, there must be a reason for it. Personally, and I'm sure many would disagree - I understand, trust me - but I'm guessing they think it'd be better for the kids in the case her Cancer suddenly takes a nose-dive. I mean, Cancer is no joke, and maybe it'd be bad for 2 young kids to have to go through.
You know what'd be great? If both the father and psychologist got cancer and their kids left them and stopped seeing them until they died and told them "hey that's the right thing to do according to you in these situations right?".
@jyusi4 Fuck you. Maybe her husband couldn't get it up or didn't ever eat her pussy. You don't fucking know their situation you DUMB FUCK. If someone's in a marriage and not getting any, they are gonna cheat.
@psychokillercrab did i say men are Innocent of cheating? and why insult me it says more about your flawed character then it does about me, insulting me without reason kinda proves your more prejudice then me, there are many "excuses" for cheating, - we don't have sex, we never go out - then there are "reasons" such as - he beats me, rapes me, abuses me - there adults she should have worked it out with her husband, because of her actions/inactions she is in this predicament
You're right. We definitely would never have heard this story because no reporter would care enough to cover it. Also, If it was the man who had cheated on the woman, there's NO WAY Ana would be saying that "it's irrelevant." Are you kidding me?
@NoeLPZC The fact that she chose to cheat endangered her marriage and, consequently, her relationship with her children. Why should the father be punished because his wife chose to cheat?
I don't think this was completely based on breast cancer, it seems to be just one factor. Should they not do whats in the best interest of the child? Maybe the father really is a better candidate.
@ReverendDoGood And you're completely wrong. The issue here is that the kids will not see their mother and she will die. This isn't a situation where the kids can see her later when they grow up or the parents get back together again, take them away and they will never ever see her again - and she is dying. This would have been just as appalling if it were reversed.
Ana and all these sexist assholes who wouldn't care about the father if the roles were reverse make it hard for me to respect feminists. i really want to believe that most feminists support equal rights for both genders, but stuff like this just keeps proving that all they really want is for women to oppress men and have unfair advantages. if the father was the one who was unemployed, dying, and cheated, you'd all be happy that he'd be spending the rest of his life alone and miserable.
This is total bullshit and you know it. I, and others, would have sympathized with the father just as much as I do the mother here. The situation would have been exactly the same - the kids are never going to see their parent ever again, and they are being taken away while the parent was dying. That is universally sad, and I repeat that you are full of shit.
@Starry2000 i never said it's not said, i feel bad for the woman as well. i was criticizing the people who are saying she's being discriminated against and deserves custody of her children because she's sick. just because she's in a bad situation doesn't mean she deserves custody, in fact that's why she DOESN'T deserve it. the well-being of the kids is most important, and if that means that they can't live with her then tough luck. although i wish the father was nicer and let them visit.
@Cuddlebunzzzz "the well-being of the kids is most important, and if that means that they can't live with her then tough luck. "
What the fuck do you think is running through their minds right now? Do you understand that this will be a demon on their back for the REST OF THEIR LIVES? It's guaranteed to ruin their relationship with their father? Need I go on? The decision was made based on money, which is what they have to do under law I believe. The problem is that this isn't measured in money.
@Starry2000 that's the reason why i said i wish the father was nice enough to let them visit, and he's an asshole for separating them. but it's stupid to believe that the kids would be better off living with their dying, jobless mother. it wasn't based just on money, the fact that she cheated also hurt her case. if they were both healthy and employed, the father still would have (or should have) gotten custody since she is the one who broke the contract of the marriage by cheating.
@DrakeIcn the courts care about what's best for the CHILDREN not the parents. It really doesn't matter what the mother OR the father thinks, whatever is best for the children is what matters.
@thebeetalls What is best for the children is to see their mother and spend time with her before she passes away. Can you imagine what it will be like for those kids to live with the memory that you were hundreds of miles away from your dying mother, taken away. Things like that matter. What they went by probably IS the fact that she doesn't currently have a job, money is always the bottomline.
@Starry2000 Huh? how do you know what's best for them, have you ever met them? you're doing what so many do, instantly assume they need their mommy. what if their mother is abusive? did you ever think she just isn't fit to raise them? I'm not saying this is the case, but don't you think the courts took that into consideration? this wasn't some lunch room survey. Unless you know details and facts about this particular family, there isn't a thing you or I can(or even should) do about it.
@DrakeIcn she has no job, so why did she refuse to move to chicago. eventually she will be in the hospital sorry to say slowly dieing. who will take care of the kids? all she had to do is move closer to the ex Husband not like they do not have cancer treatment in Chicago. I think she deserves to spend as much time as she can with the kids. funny how none of the articals I read about this asked her why she will not move. i feel bad for her and I hope she gets a mirical.
@DrakeIcn I can't stand hearing that mother's kid(s) are her's, it's THEIR kid(s). A mother can't have a child without the father. A man's sperm is the necessary component to help produce children. For example: It's impossible to play the video game without the disk or else you have a useless console.
1. Mom is going to die. (maybe not soon but she will)
2. Mom is jobless
3. Mom cheated on husband, if the husband had been adulterous you'd all be enraged and on the mom's side, so don't be hypocrites, this is relevant.
Outcome; custody for the father with visitations right for the mom on weekends and holidays.
Conclusion: I think judge made the right judgement in giving the custody to the father however the mother should still have unrestricted access to her kids.
@Rawana1989 You need to shut up. What if the case was reversed and the father had prostate cancer? The mother decided to take the kids away from him? besides, it wasn't about the cancer, it was about her infidelity which hurt him and seen a way to get their kids.
@AvalonWolf are you insane if he is a human being he wouldn't do that
for god sake the mother is gonna die
and about the cheating everybody cheats on everybody so that does not he has the right to make her suffer in her last days she is gonna die how cold is your heart ?!!!!
@Rawana1989 Your view on everybody cheats on everybody is a bit much one sided or a double standard. So since she cheated, should he do the same? If a female gets cheated on, what do you think will happen? I told you it isn't about her cancer, she cheated on him in which she betrayed him. I think you are just a bit biased. Take a look at a mother taking hers and the father's child to Brazil. She went and had a relationship there for years and died. Do you think that was right?
@anthonygrg bullshit...fact is if my father was dying i would want see him as much as possible. it makes sense for him to get custody .it is just a shame that she cant afford to pay the plane fare every weekend to see her kids.
if they lived in the same state then less people would have opposed to it.
Most of the internet commentary I've seen on this case has it exactly backward.
Take the cancer out of the picture and this is open-and-shut: faithful employed spouse gets primary custody over unemployed cheating spouse, case closed. It's only the cancer that gives her any sort of footing to claim that she should keep custody. And she's complaining about being discriminated against?
Without the cancer, this is the easiest court case in the world.
@lennex88 Dude, that was a joke. They were making FUN of the people who say things like that. Maybe you don't watch the show or something, but that's pretty damn obvious for those of us who do.
Ahhhhhhhh, I love when you don't know who's cheating, it's important but when you find out its the person you least suspected, it's apparently irrelevant(wink, wink). Additionally, TYT doesn't cover men get denied custody(wink,wink).
But the whole custody isn't supposed to be about you but about what is best for the kids so you should leave that part of your ego aside.
Either way, I'm siding with the dad. It's tough, but you can't really tell what the future will hold, but it's not like it will get any better if the kids live with dying mom as things sowly deteriorate and they are exposed to that. It's a real messed up situation that both grown ups have to figure out and make concessions, though.
I thought that this story was a hoax but its sadly its not. Tipical Republican bullshit 101. Someone needs to lash the father a thousand times a day for doing somthing as cruel as this too the mother and never let him see his kids ever agian.
Ana your such a feminist hypocrite. Obviously when people divocre the kids should go to the parent WITH A JOB. And your not considering the fathers feelings. Do you think he wanted her to get cancer? And lets forget the cancer, what if she was healthy but jobless and the father was someone with a good job and with time to take care of the kids? Don't demand "equal" rights for women when your obviously not willing to give men the equal rights in cases like this.
@Mamonuth Don't demand equal rights for men in these cases when you are such an misogynist moron. This man divorced her based on her cancer and deteriorating health. And she LOST custody, ever heard of shared custody? Didn't think so, your misogynist brain can't comprehend anything that doesn't harm the man in the relationship so you can complain about women having more rights than men.
@CannibalShinobi I've been raised by a single mother so thank you very much. The guy divorced her because she cheated on him not because of her health. Shared custody when the parents are living in different states? hell no! They live in different STATES. Yeah the kid is the biggest loser here but thats too bad. The story isn't going to get any better even if the woman got the kid. Now if you excuse me im going to hug my mother and cry because some cunt called me a misogynist.
The thing is, if she's undergoing treatment, and she's not able to physically take care of the children because she's incapacitated due to Chemo, well. . .
As stated before, Custody battles are definately not black and white, alot of stuff factors in. Though I do believe if I was in the position, if an illness had struck me so severe, I was unable to work and spent a good % of my money and time taking care of the illness and my partner was able to provide for my children better I would accept it. I would love to spend as much time as possible with my children, but also at the same time, want only the best for my kid, whether or not with me.
I feel bad for her, but I honestly don't think she will be able to take care of her kids properly. I wish the court could rule that the father must fly them in weekly or monthly or whatever, but late-stage cancer patients can't look after others! Their situation is devastating, but the kids come 1st.
@midosbaby yeah i kind of agree. if they lived in the same state then there wouldnt be a big deal. but im am sure she genuinely cant afford to fly every weekend as her medicine is expensive
I live in SC and have fam in NC. She prob lost her kids because she cheated. PPL in that state take cheating to a whole new level when it comes to being faithful.
Why is this even a story? I hate to be callous but It's called "sad day for you".
You're getting a divorced, you didn't get custody, you happen to have cancer. What else is there to talk about?
Was this story a way to make the judge feel bad for making a logical ruling or the father feel bad for moving on with his life? It's a bad situation sure, but I don't get why this involves the media when you can find bad divoce stories all across the country.
I don't care how angry the father is, he should make it as easy as posable for his ex-wife to see her kids. from what I can tell he hates her and is not capable of acting like an adult. Or else he has no idea how expensive the treatments are, for at least making his ex- wifes life bearable. And he is not acting in the best interests of his girls. In short people like him make me want to vomit!
@YanYingCookie You're making a ton of assumptions. We don't know enough to say what he's doing is wrong. What if his job sent him to Chicago? Would you quit your job in this economy knowing your ex-wife is also jobless and broke (and has stage 4 cancer)?
Custody is usually decided in the best interest of the children, not the parents. Clearly the judge figured it would be better for the kids to be with the father for whatever reason. It's not like he didn't know she had cancer.
@YanYingCookie Honestly You Don't Know How That Man Feels! Correct Me If I'm Wrong But He Was Cheated On; For Many People Thats Terminal Mentally Especially When The Word TRUST Is Important In Marriage & You Are Betrayed. Disagree If You Like; I've Seen First Hand How People Have Been Betrayed & It Feels Like Death. That Father Is Acting Like An Adult, He Went To Court Like An Adult, He Looked After The Best Interest Of His Children Like An Adult. I Bet He Still Wants Her To See Their Children!!
Why can't people just pay attention. The main problem here isn't much more than the mom is dying. If your mom was dying, what would any of you do! I bet most of you would be there, staying with them till the last minute. If anything, she should get some cusody because she will die soon. Imagine dying and never seeing your kids again. Harsh...
She cannot support her kids.. the father can... Why is there a bias against him? Fathers already get shafted enough in the system. She cannot support them. It's not that she's a bad mother... she cannot support them.
Why are Ana and Ben claiming the woman is losing custody because of her cancer? They took custody away because she doesn't have a steady income and thus cannot provide for them.
The dad moved to get a job, he is the only one with a job, and the woman wants HIM to pay for her, his kids, and travel. Why can't the dad have the kids? He should get the kids renegades of the cancer.
@TheVigilante2000 but the mom is going to die soon if u were about to die u would want to be with ur loved ones the most time possible then the dad will have full custody of the kids
@MultiNene94 Yes, and she doesn't work. There is nothing keeping her from moving to Chicago to be closer to her children. I'm even willing to bet she might get better treatment in Chicago. This is a crappy economy, and if the guy got a decent job and had to move in order to provide for his kids, fine. He shouldn't be punished because his cheating ex-wife now has cancer.
I have to disagree on ana with this one. The fact that the mother had an affair IS relevant to the situation. The fact that one party has had an affair signifies that the mentioned party is completely irresponsible, and not worhty to take care of a child. SHE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY. And im not saying this because of religious issues, FYI, i am not religious at all.
Based on the way Ana's speaking, you'd think the children were sent to foster care or something, they weren't. Their FATHER was given primary custody. I feel bad for the woman, and the children might want to spend time with their mother, on the other hand, shouldn't the children be given as much stability as they can be given, as soon as possible? And I have to ask, would this be in the news if a FATHER with stage 4 cancer lost primary custody of his children, esp after admitting to cheating.
I feel for her because I am a single father with a fatal sickness and I have primary custody of my 3yr daughter. If my ex-wife pushed hard enough in a courtroom, she would be given custody. I have had my daughter all her life and her mom has only kept her a few nights since she was born. The thing is I may have yrs to live, but ppl with a serious illness normaly have teams of Drs and can't just up and move away from them because of medical bills and it's important to see the same Drs
It was a divorce and one parent had to have custody. The mom had cancer and she diddnt have a job. Could she even support herself? Why is it such a big deal? It makes sense to me.
I think the children should live with their mother for as long as possible, I know many people who remember and cherish their last moments with their dying mother. The father should suck it up and let them say good bye then take them to Chicago.
Umm everybody on here is stupid what the heck all these men on here talking about she cheated i dont know if he didnt cheat either its he said she said stuff somethin caused her to go cheat on him was he paying her any attention nobody knows what went on in their house hold all of you people are going by what the internet said and how do you people know how much money she has you don't live with her your just going by what your reading and my opinion is he shouldn't have got custody wether she
dved2265 1 month ago
either way, the father/ex is a bastard. PERIOD
br6nf75 3 months ago in playlist Mais vídeos de TheYoungTurks
jeez ana you're wayyyy off the rails on this one. Should the cheated-on husband/father with the job move closer to help accommodate the stay at home mother? ....giimmmeeeaabbrreaakk....
dlindstadt 6 months ago
Comment removed
dlindstadt 6 months ago
So it was the psychiatrist who recommended the kids stay with the dad because: their mother is dying of cancer?????!!
And the judge agreed??!
Both idiots.
Even wild animals have more integrity and compassion.
I expect a flurry of ignorant remarks in my mail because of my views made public;
so let me say right here you will not get the satisfaction of me reading them.
There is a delete button handy for such things.
meriprem 8 months ago
Alright! Everybody with any judgments here shut up.
Get off the street drugs and headbanger music and get some compassion
and grow up and get human.
meriprem 8 months ago
How can this bitch say that the cheating spouse shouldn't effect the ruling of who gets full custody? That says something about the wifes character, and that she has no integrity. Furthermore, they might have been discriminatory because she had a terminally ill disease, but how many fucking fathers are screwed everyday when their their kids are taken away from them, and they did nothing to deserve it. I hope this women gets a taste of what its like to lose in court as a father.
nick42701 8 months ago
@nick42701 It shouldn't matter NOW, i.e. when the custody battle is completely over with. And even during, why should it really matter? It doesn't change anything for their situations. The rest you're just guessing at, and you even seem upset over details we don't have.
usucdik 8 months ago
@usucdik
If you think I'm guessing about the corruption in family court and their mission to plunder fathers, then you need to do a little research. It's so blatantly obvious, but no one really knows much about it. Most people don't know that the Bar Association controls the family court system, and that the majority of the Bar Association is made up of feminists. Courts are completely biased against fathers, and people are so accustomed to it, no wonder they throw a fit when a father wins
nick42701 8 months ago
@nick42701 So basically because of some shit that has absolutely nothing to do with the case portrayed, you think the father should get the kids. And that is despite how they already live with the mom, would have to move far away to go to the father, and the mom, the person soon DYING, would barely have any chance to see them.
Frankly, you're a moron, and you did get upset over irrelevant shit you brought up for stupid reasons.
usucdik 8 months ago
@usucdik
I wouldn't expect someone as small minded as you to understand what I'm trying to say. The father moved to Chicago because of his job, which is explained in follow up stories. The mother is the one who CHEATED on him. She was the one who decided to ruin the relationship. Just because she has cancer, doesn't mean she should get the kids. How many cases do you think there are of fathers who develope cancer that never get to see their kids, probably hundreds.
nick42701 8 months ago
@nick42701 So basically you're enraged because of whatever previous personal experience that happened to you, and now you're going for a little catharsis by pretending this situation is somehow similar to what you went through.
Face facts: she had custody. She wasn't winning custody because of her cancer. She lost it because of some arbitrary decision by a third party.
Your little crusade for fathers is irrelevant, and you look like a damn fool trying to shoehorn it into this.
usucdik 8 months ago
@usucdik
It's not just what I went through, but what 1000's of fathers go through everytime they have a custody hearing. It was n't JUST because she had cancer. Don't make it out to be so simple. It's a lot more complicated than that. And as I said previously, I wouldn't expect you to understand. All you would have to do is try and research the subject a bit to see what really happens in family court. I can tell you're someone who has never gone through child custody issues
nick42701 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nick42701
Still just as irrelevant as the first time you brought it up.
usucdik 7 months ago
@usucdik
and for that reason alone, I can't figure out why you're trying to prove me wrong. If you haven't lived it, then don't act like you know what's going on. I'm sure you couldn't reccite ONE general statute when it comes to the guidelines that most judges abide by. I bet you've never even been through divorce. I'm sure you're not paying excessive mandated amounts of child support. You're the one who looks like a fool my friend, because of your blatant ignorance to this subject.
nick42701 8 months ago
@usucdik "She lost it because of some arbitrary decision by a third party." You don't know it was arbitrary but you'd like to think it was.
Fact: You know less about the case than both the judge and the psychiatrist evaluating it and yes seem to think your uninformed opinion is the better answer.
I'm not trying to be insulting but it baffles me that people who hear one side of the story and have just a glancing view of the case seem to think their opinions right.
orion00 5 months ago
@usucdik
Maybe you need to take a step back and look at the BIGGER picture. This case got blown up because the parent who lost the children, happened to be the mother. Do you think it would've been publicized if it was the other way around? If you do, you're an even bigger idiot than I initially suspected. And another thing, the kids haven't been living with the mother that long. They're better off with the father, get that through your thick head.
nick42701 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@usucdik - take your argument outside, no one wants to hear it.
meriprem 8 months ago
@usucdik
custody. You don't think it's weird that the public has this pre-conceived notion that a father should NEVER have full custody and should ALWAYS remain the non-custodial parent? I bet you also don't know that three quarters of a century ago, fathers were actually awarded custody more than mothers were. It wasnt until the feminist movement that those rules started to change. So yea, I'm glad this father got his kids, good on him.
nick42701 8 months ago
@nick42701 - Oh, you need professional help ASAP.
You are packing a load of rage and taking it out on negative judgments on those you don't even know, and calling them nasty names. This reply is NOT meant as an insult, though you will obviously take it that way.
Someone has to tell you that this kind of thinking and behaviour is violent and sick. Get help please for your own sake and the sake of others who have to deal with you. It is almost scarry to read your rant so full of hate & rage
meriprem 8 months ago
@meriprem
Sorry, I don't take your comment as an insult, but I've been studying the family court system now for well over 6 years. I've you want to hear something that might change your mind, look up one of the leading men on the forefront of fathers rights, Dr. Stephen Baskerville. He's a doctor of law and political science, and he's an advocate of the biggest fathers right group in America. I'm not full of hate and rage, just frustration, for the way fathers are portrayed in this country.
nick42701 8 months ago
@meriprem
Sorry, I don't take your comment as an insult, but I've been studying the family court system now for well over 6 years. I've you want to hear something that might change your mind, look up one of the leading men on the forefront of fathers rights, Dr. Stephen Baskerville. He's a doctor of law and political science, and he's an advocate of the biggest fathers right group in America. I'm not full of hate and rage, just frustration, for the way fathers are portrayed in this country
nick42701 8 months ago
and this is the start of the downfall of hetero marriages once again. Personality, the minute you cheat, that tells the other person that hes not good enough. What's funny is that you hear alot of them complaining about protecting the word marriage, when they can't even keep their own marriage together.
BalooDumptruck 9 months ago
The kids will end up resenting the dad for taking away the last days they have with their mom. He's eventually going to have full custody by default anyway. Let them have their time with her.
MavenCree 9 months ago 14
the father is going to have custody eventually anyway, by denying his children the last few years of their mothers life.... well.... they are going to hate him for it when they're old enough to google their mums name.
Udinbak 9 months ago
Now that all facts are in, TYT should make a new video to apologize for poor journalism and bias positions they got on this case. I doubt they will, but you never know... They might actually stand up to what they say and seperate themselves from the same practices that some right wing medias use which are to invent stories, cover only 1 side and never retract no matter how foolish their statements were.
dadumbazz 9 months ago
@CrossTheGrigori The only thing I would say about that is most people on YouTube don't look up both sides of anything. This place can be a cesspool of stupid, and I lumped you in with the rest of them. Apparently unfairly, but there you have it. Believe me, this is probably the happiest I'll ever feel about being called on something.
PosFlow 9 months ago
ana is acting a bit ignorant here. think about what the hell do think cancer affects have on your body!? most ppl cant even move after chemotherapy, the treatment for many forms of cancer deteriorate your health in ways that affect your day to day lifestyle dramatically..this is kind of a duh point im making but its as if ana has put little to no thought behind the ramification of what cancer can and its treatment can affect the way you live your life.
truckbiz15 9 months ago
@CrossTheGrigori Hold on, there. How do you know she went behind anyone's back? Do you know the specifics of her affairs? Do you know one damn thing about any of the people involved beyond what was presented here? Probably not. I don't know shit, either. Don't judge unless you know what you're talking about.
PosFlow 9 months ago
When these kids grow up, they are going to HATE their father for taking the last 1-2 years of the mother's life from them. Nice counterproductive bullshit, you fucking jerk.
electronicoffee 9 months ago
this is crazy.. if it was reversed no one would give a damn. if a father had colon cancer cheated on his wife and was a stay at home day they wouldn't think twice about giving the kids to the mother. she is just making a uproar because she lost costudy.
jakeem823 9 months ago
I bet it the roles were reversed and it was the guy in this position, Ana wouldn't be defending him.
Actually I know she wouldn't be.
mecher3k 9 months ago
I wouldn't be surprised if this sort of thing happens everyday. We don't know the whole story. I am sure they had reason to give primary custody to the father, we're basing things on what ABC shows us and what Time is telling us from what is apparently just the mother's side of the story.
Push comes to shove, the mom should just move to Chicago and the dad should push his issues aside and work something out so his children can have access to their ailing mother.
rylraven13 9 months ago
Who are the kids better off with? A father with a job or a terminally ill mother with no job who caused the divorce?
z0mgz0rs 9 months ago 11
@z0mgz0rs that does not matter how would you feel if you were very ill and someone took your kids away. at the least she should have shared custody of the kids.
topgun685 9 months ago
@topgun685 At least she should have remained faithful.
Orutra621 9 months ago
@topgun685 SHE cheated. From the information given to us, she caused this marriage to collapse. She doesn't even have a job. In reality, you do what's best for the children, and the father is definitely the right (and moral) choice here.
z0mgz0rs 9 months ago
@z0mgz0rs - you know what? your complete lack of compassion, sensitivity and awareness towards those who are suffering makes me think that you need to endure some big time hardship yourself - and then maybe - just maybe - you will be able understand that judgements and ignorance have no place at all in life, certainly not where others are concerned. No one needs anybody's opinions - they need love and understanding - both of which you seem to lack. Grow up and get a heart.
meriprem 8 months ago
this is barely a story...
omgasmallbox 9 months ago
No clue about what the custody decision should have been, but I agree it would be an upright and admirable thing for the dad to do to move closer to the mom for the sake of everyone. Hope that is what happens.
theotormon 9 months ago
Can't they just let the kids live with her until she's dead? Consider it a dying wish.
rainxinxblack21 9 months ago
Ben FTW.
MobRulesNow 9 months ago
poor form anna
sangreiti 9 months ago
That's horrible.. to take a womans children away when she is struggling with something as horrible as cancer, I mean I do think the father should have gotten the kids yes, because he has a job and what not. I just kinda think he did it to be cruel, what man would really do that to a woman? Whether they're fighting or whatever I think it's horrible to take a womans kids away from them. I think he did it out of cruelty not for the sake of the children.
britawni 9 months ago
@britawni Let's turn the question over : What kind of cruel and selfish woman does this :
- I might be on my last days on this planet... Let's cheat and not consider that it will break my family apart.
- I'm losing a custody battle, I'll throw in accusations of abuse even know I was with a medical staff during the entire time which would've noticed it.
- I lost the custody battle... Let's get public pitty on the media.
There's no way anyone would want to stay with someone who cheated...
dadumbazz 9 months ago 3
@dadumbazz "I might be on my last days on this planet"
What if she didn't know she was sick?
Starry2000 9 months ago
@Starry2000 go read the articles...
dadumbazz 9 months ago
@britawni ... especially on the short term of things.
dadumbazz 9 months ago
@britawni - OMG! Someone on this Channel with a brain! And is HUMAN!!!!
I am sincerely surprised to read a humane and caring insight here.
meriprem 8 months ago 6
He has a job, Hes healthy, and she cheated on him......He gets the kids....resanable
thatawesomeguy098 9 months ago
@anthonygrg I completely disagree. Remember when TYT did the story about the man who lost custody of his kids just because he as agnostic? Custody battles are shitty no matter if you're a man or woman.
dakoneko 9 months ago
children being victimized by adults acting like children
what else is new
pnoozi 9 months ago 22
I think females don't know the extent of marriage, and what it really means. You let feelings dictate your outcome and forget that you're only human so you can't 100% trust your feelings, but you do so. Once the marriage is ruined and you're on your own, you wonder how you get in bad you got yourself in terrible circumstances.
AvalonWolf 9 months ago
Like, to see her succumb to it? I don't know. It's really not fair, but the damage of seeing one's mother fade away may be too much for such young little girls. Life is really unpredictable.
With that said, dude needs to man up and try to move closer. True, she was unfaithful, but everyone makes mistakes. It's quite possible this sickness pushed them further apart, so she sought attention elsewhere... We just can't know, and it's not really fair to judge.
breakingthisdown 9 months ago
@breakingthisdown
Absurd.. The man has a job, and is providing for his unfaithful ex-wife and his children.
Depending on his career, jobs do not grow on trees. Where as every town/city in america has a hospital. She needs to take responsibility and move closer to him.
Lets keep it real, man gets cheated on by a women, then divorces the women and has to leave his kids with said women, AND has to pay for the living expenses of this women?
Naw man, its decided she needs to move closer
bjahava 9 months ago
Alright, I found it hard to pay attention towards the last minute or so, but from what I've gathered...yes, it is very sad that this lady is losing custody of her kids, but as everyone's saying, there must be a reason for it. Personally, and I'm sure many would disagree - I understand, trust me - but I'm guessing they think it'd be better for the kids in the case her Cancer suddenly takes a nose-dive. I mean, Cancer is no joke, and maybe it'd be bad for 2 young kids to have to go through.
breakingthisdown 9 months ago
You know what'd be great? If both the father and psychologist got cancer and their kids left them and stopped seeing them until they died and told them "hey that's the right thing to do according to you in these situations right?".
fablan6 9 months ago
bitch shouldn't have cheated
jyusi4 9 months ago 14
@jyusi4 Fuck you. Maybe her husband couldn't get it up or didn't ever eat her pussy. You don't fucking know their situation you DUMB FUCK. If someone's in a marriage and not getting any, they are gonna cheat.
electronicoffee 9 months ago
@jyusi4 But men cheat and they are pimps? STFU bigot...
psychokillercrab 9 months ago
@psychokillercrab did i say men are Innocent of cheating? and why insult me it says more about your flawed character then it does about me, insulting me without reason kinda proves your more prejudice then me, there are many "excuses" for cheating, - we don't have sex, we never go out - then there are "reasons" such as - he beats me, rapes me, abuses me - there adults she should have worked it out with her husband, because of her actions/inactions she is in this predicament
jyusi4 9 months ago
@jyusi4 I agree with you but your comment was one sided. If you don't want to be insulted don't be bias.
psychokillercrab 9 months ago
Don't expect much sympathy from him. She cheated on him. If anyone should move it should be her. She doesn't have a job anyway.
YajirobiforReal 9 months ago
She cheated on him. She doesn't have a job. She is very ill.
I think all that should be takin into consideration.
YajirobiforReal 9 months ago
You're right. We definitely would never have heard this story because no reporter would care enough to cover it. Also, If it was the man who had cheated on the woman, there's NO WAY Ana would be saying that "it's irrelevant." Are you kidding me?
kuunami 9 months ago
@kuunami DEFINITELY AGREE WITH YOU!!
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
@anthonygrg
Agreed!!!
kuunami 9 months ago
@NoeLPZC The fact that she chose to cheat endangered her marriage and, consequently, her relationship with her children. Why should the father be punished because his wife chose to cheat?
redvenomweb 9 months ago
The fact that the mother lives in North Carolina in the first place should be enough reason for any judge to grant the Father sole custody.
UncleFesterius 9 months ago
I don't think this was completely based on breast cancer, it seems to be just one factor. Should they not do whats in the best interest of the child? Maybe the father really is a better candidate.
langox510x 9 months ago
@anthonygrg COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU!!
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
@ReverendDoGood And you're completely wrong. The issue here is that the kids will not see their mother and she will die. This isn't a situation where the kids can see her later when they grow up or the parents get back together again, take them away and they will never ever see her again - and she is dying. This would have been just as appalling if it were reversed.
Starry2000 9 months ago
@Starry2000 Starry I Saw You Are 108 Years Old, You Should Be Focusing On Your Health Instead Of Being On YouTube!! Lol. Lol.
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
@ReverendDoGood Why Do You Write Like You're Writing A Title?
breakingthisdown 9 months ago
@breakingthisdown @breakingthisdown Because You Don't Make More Videos Of Your Bird, & You Didn't Take Me To The Zoo To See Those Otters!! Lol. Lol.
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
@ReverendDoGood *just shudders*
breakingthisdown 9 months ago
Its not just Cancer, its stage 4 cancer. I kinda agree with the judge but it can go both ways.
wilsonsmanz 9 months ago
Ana and all these sexist assholes who wouldn't care about the father if the roles were reverse make it hard for me to respect feminists. i really want to believe that most feminists support equal rights for both genders, but stuff like this just keeps proving that all they really want is for women to oppress men and have unfair advantages. if the father was the one who was unemployed, dying, and cheated, you'd all be happy that he'd be spending the rest of his life alone and miserable.
Cuddlebunzzzz 9 months ago
@Cuddlebunzzzz "if the father was the one who was"
This is total bullshit and you know it. I, and others, would have sympathized with the father just as much as I do the mother here. The situation would have been exactly the same - the kids are never going to see their parent ever again, and they are being taken away while the parent was dying. That is universally sad, and I repeat that you are full of shit.
Starry2000 9 months ago
@Starry2000 i never said it's not said, i feel bad for the woman as well. i was criticizing the people who are saying she's being discriminated against and deserves custody of her children because she's sick. just because she's in a bad situation doesn't mean she deserves custody, in fact that's why she DOESN'T deserve it. the well-being of the kids is most important, and if that means that they can't live with her then tough luck. although i wish the father was nicer and let them visit.
Cuddlebunzzzz 9 months ago
@Cuddlebunzzzz "the well-being of the kids is most important, and if that means that they can't live with her then tough luck. "
What the fuck do you think is running through their minds right now? Do you understand that this will be a demon on their back for the REST OF THEIR LIVES? It's guaranteed to ruin their relationship with their father? Need I go on? The decision was made based on money, which is what they have to do under law I believe. The problem is that this isn't measured in money.
Starry2000 9 months ago
@Starry2000 that's the reason why i said i wish the father was nice enough to let them visit, and he's an asshole for separating them. but it's stupid to believe that the kids would be better off living with their dying, jobless mother. it wasn't based just on money, the fact that she cheated also hurt her case. if they were both healthy and employed, the father still would have (or should have) gotten custody since she is the one who broke the contract of the marriage by cheating.
Cuddlebunzzzz 9 months ago
@Cuddlebunzzzz
Well said, I agree.
kuunami 9 months ago
Yeah the Dad Finally Gets the Kids ..Am I the Only one who see's this as a Win?
Bauks420 9 months ago
Jesus fucking christ, the woman is dying.
The father is such an asshole, refusing to give her a little more time with her children, probably the only joy she has left in life.
DrakeIcn 9 months ago
@DrakeIcn the courts care about what's best for the CHILDREN not the parents. It really doesn't matter what the mother OR the father thinks, whatever is best for the children is what matters.
thebeetalls 9 months ago
@thebeetalls What is best for the children is to see their mother and spend time with her before she passes away. Can you imagine what it will be like for those kids to live with the memory that you were hundreds of miles away from your dying mother, taken away. Things like that matter. What they went by probably IS the fact that she doesn't currently have a job, money is always the bottomline.
Starry2000 9 months ago
@Starry2000 Huh? how do you know what's best for them, have you ever met them? you're doing what so many do, instantly assume they need their mommy. what if their mother is abusive? did you ever think she just isn't fit to raise them? I'm not saying this is the case, but don't you think the courts took that into consideration? this wasn't some lunch room survey. Unless you know details and facts about this particular family, there isn't a thing you or I can(or even should) do about it.
thebeetalls 9 months ago
@DrakeIcn she has no job, so why did she refuse to move to chicago. eventually she will be in the hospital sorry to say slowly dieing. who will take care of the kids? all she had to do is move closer to the ex Husband not like they do not have cancer treatment in Chicago. I think she deserves to spend as much time as she can with the kids. funny how none of the articals I read about this asked her why she will not move. i feel bad for her and I hope she gets a mirical.
Roninlord25a 9 months ago
@DrakeIcn I can't stand hearing that mother's kid(s) are her's, it's THEIR kid(s). A mother can't have a child without the father. A man's sperm is the necessary component to help produce children. For example: It's impossible to play the video game without the disk or else you have a useless console.
AvalonWolf 9 months ago
So let's review the facts:
1. Mom is going to die. (maybe not soon but she will)
2. Mom is jobless
3. Mom cheated on husband, if the husband had been adulterous you'd all be enraged and on the mom's side, so don't be hypocrites, this is relevant.
Outcome; custody for the father with visitations right for the mom on weekends and holidays.
Conclusion: I think judge made the right judgement in giving the custody to the father however the mother should still have unrestricted access to her kids.
philosophystudent 9 months ago
@philosophystudent EXCELLENT EXPLANATION!! As A Judge Of The World Court, I Vote For What You Say!!
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
ONE WORD TO THE HUSBAND GO TO HELL she is gonna die soon idiot
Rawana1989 9 months ago
@Rawana1989 Why is he an idiot? She cheated on him what's he supposed to do?
greenchef6 9 months ago
@Rawana1989 You need to shut up. What if the case was reversed and the father had prostate cancer? The mother decided to take the kids away from him? besides, it wasn't about the cancer, it was about her infidelity which hurt him and seen a way to get their kids.
AvalonWolf 9 months ago
@AvalonWolf are you insane if he is a human being he wouldn't do that
for god sake the mother is gonna die
and about the cheating everybody cheats on everybody so that does not he has the right to make her suffer in her last days she is gonna die how cold is your heart ?!!!!
Rawana1989 9 months ago
@Rawana1989 Your view on everybody cheats on everybody is a bit much one sided or a double standard. So since she cheated, should he do the same? If a female gets cheated on, what do you think will happen? I told you it isn't about her cancer, she cheated on him in which she betrayed him. I think you are just a bit biased. Take a look at a mother taking hers and the father's child to Brazil. She went and had a relationship there for years and died. Do you think that was right?
AvalonWolf 9 months ago
@AvalonWolf well it is not fair and before u start telling life is not fair he can work something out
Rawana1989 9 months ago
@Rawana1989b well I can agree with you on is he can work something out with her.
AvalonWolf 9 months ago
@AvalonWolf well thanx
Rawana1989 9 months ago
@AvalonWolf well it is not fair and before u start telling me life is not fair he can work something out
Rawana1989 9 months ago
@anthonygrg bullshit...fact is if my father was dying i would want see him as much as possible. it makes sense for him to get custody .it is just a shame that she cant afford to pay the plane fare every weekend to see her kids.
if they lived in the same state then less people would have opposed to it.
aylix89 9 months ago
Lol yea, discriminating cause you have cancer. Typical. You lost, deal with it.
Direksone 9 months ago
"It's also noticed that the stay at home mother doesn't have a job!"
Pure. Fucking. BULLSHIT!
guitargod909 9 months ago
Most of the internet commentary I've seen on this case has it exactly backward.
Take the cancer out of the picture and this is open-and-shut: faithful employed spouse gets primary custody over unemployed cheating spouse, case closed. It's only the cancer that gives her any sort of footing to claim that she should keep custody. And she's complaining about being discriminated against?
Without the cancer, this is the easiest court case in the world.
redvenomweb 9 months ago
@redvenomweb Why should who cheated on who have any bearing on the matter? She cheated on her husband, not her kids.
NoeLPZC 9 months ago
seriously? something of the gay disease? just because you have hiv or aids doesn't make you gay.... yeah fuck the TYT
lennex88 9 months ago
@lennex88 Dude, that was a joke. They were making FUN of the people who say things like that. Maybe you don't watch the show or something, but that's pretty damn obvious for those of us who do.
PosFlow 9 months ago
Lost her kids, lost her husband and about to lose her life.
Misseryfate 9 months ago
thats bull shit
BlazyNonVevo 9 months ago
@BlazyNonVevo father needs custody... mother doesn't need to have the kids... plus she doesn't have a job!
lennex88 9 months ago
oh nice one "discrimination because i have cancer" no, thats bs.
AForkSpoon 9 months ago
a "gay" disease? wow.
crzycuban10 9 months ago
Ahhhhhhhh, I love when you don't know who's cheating, it's important but when you find out its the person you least suspected, it's apparently irrelevant(wink, wink). Additionally, TYT doesn't cover men get denied custody(wink,wink).
KissFromDaddy 9 months ago 2
Hmmm, so if a wife cheats it's "totally irrelevant", but if the husband cheats he's the bad guy? Interesting double standard, eh?
MontrealAtheist 9 months ago
@MontrealAtheist LOL, I just wrote that, it's funny right? Like WTF.
KissFromDaddy 9 months ago
Those kids are going to regret it for the rest of the their lives for not being with their mother in her last few year(s).
darkprincess1012 9 months ago
@anthonygrg
But the whole custody isn't supposed to be about you but about what is best for the kids so you should leave that part of your ego aside.
Either way, I'm siding with the dad. It's tough, but you can't really tell what the future will hold, but it's not like it will get any better if the kids live with dying mom as things sowly deteriorate and they are exposed to that. It's a real messed up situation that both grown ups have to figure out and make concessions, though.
unabomberman 9 months ago
Whippin' out celebrity gossip and entertainment new like a diva whips her weave. check out my website whitneyspears. com
x0x0
WS
MsWhitneySpears 9 months ago
I thought that this story was a hoax but its sadly its not. Tipical Republican bullshit 101. Someone needs to lash the father a thousand times a day for doing somthing as cruel as this too the mother and never let him see his kids ever agian.
2012thedevil 9 months ago
Ana your such a feminist hypocrite. Obviously when people divocre the kids should go to the parent WITH A JOB. And your not considering the fathers feelings. Do you think he wanted her to get cancer? And lets forget the cancer, what if she was healthy but jobless and the father was someone with a good job and with time to take care of the kids? Don't demand "equal" rights for women when your obviously not willing to give men the equal rights in cases like this.
Mamonuth 9 months ago 41
@Mamonuth Don't demand equal rights for men in these cases when you are such an misogynist moron. This man divorced her based on her cancer and deteriorating health. And she LOST custody, ever heard of shared custody? Didn't think so, your misogynist brain can't comprehend anything that doesn't harm the man in the relationship so you can complain about women having more rights than men.
CannibalShinobi 9 months ago
@CannibalShinobi I've been raised by a single mother so thank you very much. The guy divorced her because she cheated on him not because of her health. Shared custody when the parents are living in different states? hell no! They live in different STATES. Yeah the kid is the biggest loser here but thats too bad. The story isn't going to get any better even if the woman got the kid. Now if you excuse me im going to hug my mother and cry because some cunt called me a misogynist.
Mamonuth 9 months ago
@Mamonuth Hahaha, I was just typing the same thing and scrolled down to see you beat me to it. Sounds like that user has a misandrist brain.
Orutra621 9 months ago
The thing is, if she's undergoing treatment, and she's not able to physically take care of the children because she's incapacitated due to Chemo, well. . .
Best interest of the children, not the parents.
shalcall 9 months ago
As stated before, Custody battles are definately not black and white, alot of stuff factors in. Though I do believe if I was in the position, if an illness had struck me so severe, I was unable to work and spent a good % of my money and time taking care of the illness and my partner was able to provide for my children better I would accept it. I would love to spend as much time as possible with my children, but also at the same time, want only the best for my kid, whether or not with me.
DrgnSlayer1289 9 months ago 3
I feel bad for her, but I honestly don't think she will be able to take care of her kids properly. I wish the court could rule that the father must fly them in weekly or monthly or whatever, but late-stage cancer patients can't look after others! Their situation is devastating, but the kids come 1st.
midosbaby 9 months ago
@midosbaby yeah i kind of agree. if they lived in the same state then there wouldnt be a big deal. but im am sure she genuinely cant afford to fly every weekend as her medicine is expensive
aylix89 9 months ago
I live in SC and have fam in NC. She prob lost her kids because she cheated. PPL in that state take cheating to a whole new level when it comes to being faithful.
Duobitdezo 9 months ago
Why is this even a story? I hate to be callous but It's called "sad day for you".
You're getting a divorced, you didn't get custody, you happen to have cancer. What else is there to talk about?
Was this story a way to make the judge feel bad for making a logical ruling or the father feel bad for moving on with his life? It's a bad situation sure, but I don't get why this involves the media when you can find bad divoce stories all across the country.
oolong2 9 months ago
poor kids. .
mom srsly sounds like a bitch though, stay at home mom who cheats. . OKAY, how did she get custody?
Laartu 9 months ago
I don't care how angry the father is, he should make it as easy as posable for his ex-wife to see her kids. from what I can tell he hates her and is not capable of acting like an adult. Or else he has no idea how expensive the treatments are, for at least making his ex- wifes life bearable. And he is not acting in the best interests of his girls. In short people like him make me want to vomit!
YanYingCookie 9 months ago
@YanYingCookie How do you know his hate isn't justified?
Sephlock 9 months ago 2
@YanYingCookie You're making a ton of assumptions. We don't know enough to say what he's doing is wrong. What if his job sent him to Chicago? Would you quit your job in this economy knowing your ex-wife is also jobless and broke (and has stage 4 cancer)?
Custody is usually decided in the best interest of the children, not the parents. Clearly the judge figured it would be better for the kids to be with the father for whatever reason. It's not like he didn't know she had cancer.
shalcall 9 months ago
@YanYingCookie Honestly You Don't Know How That Man Feels! Correct Me If I'm Wrong But He Was Cheated On; For Many People Thats Terminal Mentally Especially When The Word TRUST Is Important In Marriage & You Are Betrayed. Disagree If You Like; I've Seen First Hand How People Have Been Betrayed & It Feels Like Death. That Father Is Acting Like An Adult, He Went To Court Like An Adult, He Looked After The Best Interest Of His Children Like An Adult. I Bet He Still Wants Her To See Their Children!!
ReverendDoGood 9 months ago
@ReverendDoGood holy fcuk did you have to capitalize every word? for some reason it just hurts my eyes so much reading that T_T
FengxianLeTerrible 9 months ago
Why can't people just pay attention. The main problem here isn't much more than the mom is dying. If your mom was dying, what would any of you do! I bet most of you would be there, staying with them till the last minute. If anything, she should get some cusody because she will die soon. Imagine dying and never seeing your kids again. Harsh...
Werefoxz 9 months ago
RIGHT, because you know when the man cheats in relationship its totally discounted and ignored in custody cases..pfft yeah right.
corbono1231 9 months ago
She cannot support her kids.. the father can... Why is there a bias against him? Fathers already get shafted enough in the system. She cannot support them. It's not that she's a bad mother... she cannot support them.
Tazirai 9 months ago
Why are Ana and Ben claiming the woman is losing custody because of her cancer? They took custody away because she doesn't have a steady income and thus cannot provide for them.
spaaron22 9 months ago
fuck custody, let the fucking parents decide
coopmuch56 9 months ago
The dad moved to get a job, he is the only one with a job, and the woman wants HIM to pay for her, his kids, and travel. Why can't the dad have the kids? He should get the kids renegades of the cancer.
TheVigilante2000 9 months ago
@TheVigilante2000 but the mom is going to die soon if u were about to die u would want to be with ur loved ones the most time possible then the dad will have full custody of the kids
MultiNene94 9 months ago
@MultiNene94 Yes, and she doesn't work. There is nothing keeping her from moving to Chicago to be closer to her children. I'm even willing to bet she might get better treatment in Chicago. This is a crappy economy, and if the guy got a decent job and had to move in order to provide for his kids, fine. He shouldn't be punished because his cheating ex-wife now has cancer.
shalcall 9 months ago
@shalcall but she also shouldnt get punished for having cancer and not being able to work
MultiNene94 9 months ago
@MultiNene94 No one is punishing her. She can move to Chicago to be closer to her kids.
shalcall 9 months ago
@MultiNene94 Well she claims she could live for 20 years. Maybe if she really only had a year left you would want to see her as much as possible.
TheVigilante2000 9 months ago
i don't know, If their father has custody, what is the problem?
jopaddy81 9 months ago
These two were just dysfunctional. They should never have had children.
Vows are crap.
baalisgod666 9 months ago
Wait, which spouse cheated should be irrelevant to who gets the custody? Are you serious?!?!?!?!
rockysimon2005 9 months ago
Solution, flip a coin. It is obvious.
zero9112 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what about the fact that she HAS NO JOB.
dangflo 9 months ago
dang thats sad!!! i would never leave my wife if she had cancer!!!!
imikey123 9 months ago
I have to disagree on ana with this one. The fact that the mother had an affair IS relevant to the situation. The fact that one party has had an affair signifies that the mentioned party is completely irresponsible, and not worhty to take care of a child. SHE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY. And im not saying this because of religious issues, FYI, i am not religious at all.
xzxdrakezxz 9 months ago
@xzxdrakezxz
How do you know that the father didn't cheat as well...even if she said it he would deny that he did.
makin13 9 months ago
@makin13 so are you defending her?
xzxdrakezxz 9 months ago
Based on the way Ana's speaking, you'd think the children were sent to foster care or something, they weren't. Their FATHER was given primary custody. I feel bad for the woman, and the children might want to spend time with their mother, on the other hand, shouldn't the children be given as much stability as they can be given, as soon as possible? And I have to ask, would this be in the news if a FATHER with stage 4 cancer lost primary custody of his children, esp after admitting to cheating.
morgained4 9 months ago
I was with her until she admitted to cheating. For the well being of the kids future, the father is the best choice.
WindyCityFly3r 9 months ago
I feel for her because I am a single father with a fatal sickness and I have primary custody of my 3yr daughter. If my ex-wife pushed hard enough in a courtroom, she would be given custody. I have had my daughter all her life and her mom has only kept her a few nights since she was born. The thing is I may have yrs to live, but ppl with a serious illness normaly have teams of Drs and can't just up and move away from them because of medical bills and it's important to see the same Drs
ginko27 9 months ago 2
@ginko27 damn :( you got my prays
Angovp 9 months ago
@ginko27 I wish you all the best...
morgained4 9 months ago
It was a divorce and one parent had to have custody. The mom had cancer and she diddnt have a job. Could she even support herself? Why is it such a big deal? It makes sense to me.
AnthonyTheAngelFan 9 months ago
I think the children should live with their mother for as long as possible, I know many people who remember and cherish their last moments with their dying mother. The father should suck it up and let them say good bye then take them to Chicago.
RandomGurl27Q 9 months ago
Hey TYT why would you want the kid to be with the mom who has no job and can't support her kids?
lilnicky492 9 months ago
@lilnicky492 Because the dad needs to step in and make sure the kids know their mother before she dies.
Starry2000 9 months ago