gen57: They talk about parabolic arcs, but won't they don't understand is that the roostertails will be made up of thousands of regolith particles, all with different overlapping parabolic arcs. If that happens you get the flattened arc that they all scream is proof of the regolith hitting atmosphere. No, it's just the shape of lots of overlapping parabolic arcs.
Fractal- Good point. My point has always been that it is not necessary to talk about parabolic arcs when it is obvious that the finest particles in the rover's wheel ejecta, would if in an atmosphere such as the Earth's, produce a cloud of dust. Dust would be suspended in the atmosphere for a short time. We don't see a cloud of dust so they're either on lunar surface or in a huge vacuum chamber. The location of the VC has not been disclosed- because it does not exist.
'Spray it with some water and try to get the same effect... '
You do realize we're talking about the lunar surface?
'also, with 1/6 gravity, shouldnt dirt throw up even further?'
Just how far do you think dirt should be thrown from a large diameter wheel on a vehicle moving at 10mph?
More revealing is the absense of clouds of dust following the rover. If the rover was running in wet soil or mud- do you not think you would see something different - like a muddy rover?
Rob260- don't you find it strange- all the talk about parabolic arcs- but nothing about dust clouds everyone has seen on Earth while driving down a gravel or dirt road? It must have been one huge vacuum chamber they faked the EVA's in. I wonder if there is any evidence of its existence? Hoaxers must have a picture, or a location
gen57: They talk about parabolic arcs, but won't they don't understand is that the roostertails will be made up of thousands of regolith particles, all with different overlapping parabolic arcs. If that happens you get the flattened arc that they all scream is proof of the regolith hitting atmosphere. No, it's just the shape of lots of overlapping parabolic arcs.
FractalDimensions 2 years ago
Fractal- Good point. My point has always been that it is not necessary to talk about parabolic arcs when it is obvious that the finest particles in the rover's wheel ejecta, would if in an atmosphere such as the Earth's, produce a cloud of dust. Dust would be suspended in the atmosphere for a short time. We don't see a cloud of dust so they're either on lunar surface or in a huge vacuum chamber. The location of the VC has not been disclosed- because it does not exist.
gen57b 2 years ago
Id say it depends on the soil... Spray it with some water and try to get the same effect...
gullungen84 2 years ago
also, with 1/6 gravity, shouldnt dirt throw up even further? doesnt make sense.
gullungen84 2 years ago
'Spray it with some water and try to get the same effect... '
You do realize we're talking about the lunar surface?
'also, with 1/6 gravity, shouldnt dirt throw up even further?'
Just how far do you think dirt should be thrown from a large diameter wheel on a vehicle moving at 10mph?
More revealing is the absense of clouds of dust following the rover. If the rover was running in wet soil or mud- do you not think you would see something different - like a muddy rover?
gen57b 2 years ago
Hah!. A very simple but effective little footage.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Rob260- don't you find it strange- all the talk about parabolic arcs- but nothing about dust clouds everyone has seen on Earth while driving down a gravel or dirt road? It must have been one huge vacuum chamber they faked the EVA's in. I wonder if there is any evidence of its existence? Hoaxers must have a picture, or a location
gen57b 2 years ago
Ofcourse hoaxtards have a picture! It's in their delusional minds.
Rob260259 2 years ago
This is video proof of how dust react`s on the earth.
Humm, does`nt even look close to the luner soil kicked up by the Apollo LRV.
It appear`s the the Hoaxer`s won`t like this one.
Thank`s for the video. Keep up the good work.
garleec 3 years ago