Added: 2 years ago
From: RidleyReport
Views: 49,721
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (966)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • questions questions ... Judge was mad already for something before this

  • What a patronizing asshole. I think the judge needs to be evaluated and should have his authority taken away until the review is completed. He is so caught up in being an arrogant dick that he is making himself look like an idiot who can't comprehend the citizen's simple questions.

  • Has anyone asked if the court is an Admiralty court? After pointing out the gold trim on the flag?

  • They did they same thing to me. DO NOT DELIVER A PLEA and OBJECT when the judge tries and administer one on your behalf. The US Government went bankrupt. Nature and Cause is just JURISDICTION. THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION. They are bankrupt and are handing out fraudjulant driver's licences and insurance company policies.. <-dont care about spelling, fuck it.

  • by accepting a court date you agree to their proceedings.

  • wow this judge is really digging himself a huge hole.

  • Police , Judges and Prosecutors should start getting used to TV cameras on them at all times because I get the feeling the only way we are going to be able to have justice ever is to have those retarded fort Knox style courtrooms open for all to see every word every action done in them. Also we need power as people to over throw ineffective authority figures. Strike one your out policy needed.

  • @CapnCrossbones interesting that you would say this. A Bill allowing cameras in the SCOTUS just passed. The 'authorities' will fight this with everything they possess. An educated 'public' is "their" worst nightmare. I am NOT against "justice," however, some of the absolute BS I have seen lately is worse than 1936 Germany... WOW

  • @major30415 Hi Major thanks for the reply to my comment. I agree with your 1936 Germany comment too. I hope n pray your people get it sorted in the states so you can have your rights back. Peace major!

  • This Judge Needs a Bat across his his head...Repeatedly!!!!! Moron!

  • The defendant fucked up 1st by standing up in court when the judge entered the room, this establishes juristiction. He also fucked up by saying he "understands", this statement told the court that stands under the court and therefore he submitted himself to commercial law. He should of had someone represent him with his birth certificate and he "his physical body" should not have been present.

  • Thanks for taking the risk and uploading this.

  • Perth Amboy NJ . no wonder the judge sounds like the cocksucker he is

  • Judges are utterly useless. Educated juries are more reliable for defending our rights. Time to abolish the Judiciary system and revert back to the Constitution's original plan.

  • I don't understand this "nature and cause of these proceeding's" rubbish that seems to be circulating on the internet at the moment. What is not to understand, he stated that he wasn't wearing a seat belt and had tinted window's surely that's the nature of the charges and possibly the cause being stupidity on the defendants part? At least in this case this defense seems to have worked out well.

  • WTF?! This dude is an idiot. the nature? what does he not understand? Wasting tax-payers money. The judge is being very patient. Dude is a sucktard.

  • @IGNANT4LIFE Then, I guess you will remain "IGNANT4LIFE"! His questions were completely valid and ignorant assholes like you made the few who are awake seem like "tinfoil hats". Being well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of good health. Enjoy your aspartame, and sodium fluoride lobotomy comrade!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne I am enjoying my diet pepsi very much thank you. ;0) There is nothing wrong with ther questions the man was asking; the problem is who he is asking them to. All the answers to his questions are available from many sources other than a employee of the state who we pay more per hour than any other person hired by the state who is involved with court proceedings. The judge is the only person who is authorized to oversee hearings and arraignments; wasting his/her time with quest

  • @4n0nym0us0ne tions that can be answered by a myriad of other sources which would be more economical, efficient, and reasonable. Also, by the type of questions the numskull was asking (and the potential answers he was providing), he clearly knew either the answers, or where else to find the answers. He was simply trying to irk a judge so he could post his smuggled recording on-line so sheltered people with no legal knowledge will moan about

  • @4n0nym0us0ne such an "injustice" without having ever really experiencing injustice. Expose some real injustice and quit wasting time, money, and resources of an already extremely overburdened justice system. Besides, window tinting, seatbelts and proper operation are all conditions of a privilege, not a right. Dude shoulda exercised better care while exercising the privilege to drive, which is granted by the state.

  • @IGNANT4LIFE Wow, so many assumptions, I don't know where to start. So, I wont bother. You know absolutely nothing about me, my profession, history, or current state of mind! Everything in your rants is textbook state indoctrination. You have no mind of your own, so keep on talking, that way everyone else will know how "Ignant" IGNANT4LIFE is! You love authority when it's taking advantage of others but if someone accuses you of a crime it's, I'm a victim of (fill excuse in here)!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne bother please. reply with substance more than personal commentary. argue one point on the merit with support rather than name calling. And you too have no clue about my profession, history, etc. none of that personal business is relevant. Come with something real or else move on. I ain't no victim and never claimed to be. Dueces.

  • @IGNANT4LIFE Ok, let start with the idea that judges are not accountable to the public and do not have to answer questions. Let's say he asks a lawyer and the guy is a complete hack PD and gives bad legal advise. I would trust an answer from an honest judge before some kid just out of law school, assuming I could find an honest judge! There is a reason that lawyers and judges (ex-ambulance chasers) are so despised buy most Americans, most are as crooked as a dogs hind leg!

  • @IGNANT4LIFE By saying that he is liable for damages to the state that were never incurred by the state of which you are part of, you are claiming to be the victim of his potential negligence. Profession, history, etc, are totally relevant when having a debate about the law, its origins and intent. Where you received your "knowledge" is indicative of the quality of that knowledge! The world is ruled, not by the law, but the peoples ignorance of it!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne ha! if you only knew...

  • @IGNANT4LIFE Please, elaborate!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne you suck at arguing substance. "By saying that he is liable for damages to the state that were never incurred by the state of which you are part of, you are claiming to be the victim of his potential negligence." <--What?! make sense dueche!

  • @IGNANT4LIFE I'll try to simplify for you. When the state charges you with a crime, it is claiming that the residents of that state have been victimized or damaged in some way. As a resident of that state, having voted on laws, you are claiming that you have been victimized or damaged said crime. That is how the law works, all the states resources against the individual. That's why we USED TO HAVE due process, to protect the individual against the power of the state. Understand?

  • @4n0nym0us0ne what does that have to do with justifying the man's repeated nagging of the judge to explain the nature of the charges? How does what you have typed above support the position that the person recording/whining was not wasting time, resources and patience in an effort to instigate problems with the court? All you did was attempt to vaguely explain two aspects of the law which were tangentially related to the fool's whining.

  • @IGNANT4LIFE The court has wasted the individuals time with ridiculous charges that have no victim or damages related! The problem is with victim's like yourself who want to regulate everybody's behavior because they think everybody is as half-witted as you are and need to be forced to use something as valuable as a seat-belt! Your stupidity is beginning to bore me. I'll bet you'd be first in line to by heroin once it's legal, because you're just that fucking stupid!

  • @IGNANT4LIFE ask him to show a video of a soverign winning in court.....he gets all pissed and you can almost hear the whine in his voice.......LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

  • @brittboyer1 Sovereigns don't typically win in court, thanks in part to brittboyer1s sitting in the jury box without a clue of their common law rights. If you are saying the the courts carryout justice, I would submit to you that I have seen federal judges overturn jury's verdicts! That mean's, even if found innocent of a crime by jury of your peers, the judge can still take your freedom. Not Justice, JUST-US!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne Provide the case name and citation of these instances you allege.

  • @IGNANT4LIFE United States VS. Makham! Mrs. Mahkam was charged with two counts of conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance along with about 14 other charges. After being found guilty on half of said charges, the judge decided that no jury in their right mind could convict on half on the charges and not the other due to the nature of the crimes and the fact the Mrs. Mahkam was illiterate and incapable of aiding in the crimes alleged. Right or wrong the decision sets precedent

  • @4n0nym0us0ne can you post a video of that too?........LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!! Some it's someone else's fault u idiots don't win in court.....there ya go...blame everyone else.....

  • @4n0nym0us0ne everything you rant is soverign bullshit, THAT DOESN'T WORK....Go get ur money back from the seminar you paid for. SHOW a video of a soverign WINNING in court.....still waiting...........

  • @brittboyer1 You are right, you're not a sovereign, you're a subject so quit acting like your opinion fucking matters and get back to work slave! If you don't have enough respect for yourself to understand what a sovereign is and what has been sacrificed so that you could be one, instead of subject to one, then you deserve bondage!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne go try to get ur money back from the seminar you attended. That is who you need to serve with fake documents and deeds and make sure ur dumb ass writes in crayon, b/c that is the only way they are legal.......LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @brittboyer1 I guess you're SPLC indoctrination, I mean education, was free. Oh well, you get what you pay for. BTW, I don't need to pay for classes when I have a copy of the US Constitution. I have a state driver's license and insurance and wear my seat-belt, not because "It's the Law" but because seat-belts are a great invention (the free market determined that without the government) and I'm not capable of self insuring (again, the free market at work).

  • @brittboyer1 Sorry, no video of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. You do know what independence means right? As in not subject to the sovereign!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You make urself sound so stupid.......still waiting for a video of a soverign winning in court......ENJOY WALKING!!!!

  • @brittboyer1 Your sophomoric insults convinced me that more government is needed! Some people truly are to stupid to function without big brother telling them what to do and not to do. In fact, I'm such a convert that I say in order to cut down on the burden of the legal system by semi-functional half-wits such as yourself, we should implement a eugenics program and you should be the first candidate for mandatory sterilization. I love government control! :-)

  • @4n0nym0us0ne Got that video of a soverign winning in court?.........I didn't think so.......LMAO!!!

  • @brittboyer1 I don't owe you anything. If you want to remain asleep, I don't blame you. The real world can be a scary place but don't worry the government will take care of you. Sweet dreams.

  • @4n0nym0us0ne Your right you don't owe me or anyone else anything. You act like we depend on the gov to take care of us? We know better. But we also know this crap don't work in court. Arguing with a judge doesn't get things changed, it paints a target on you. Gotta stay under the radar, and posting videos on YT is not the way to do it. You'd be surprised on my opinion of the gov.

  • @brittboyer1 Who's we, do you have a turd in your pocket?! I don't rely on my government for anything. I will never receive SS or other welfare, police are never there when you need them, yet If you open carry to protect yourself, the police will be there in minutes but I have yet to see a criminal advertise their gun, criminals carry concealed without permits. Don't you feel safe now. The best way to stay under the radar is to remain a loyal servant and lick globalist boot!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne The only turd here is you. Stay on YT b/c ur going to get so much accomplished. Try posting a video of u idiots winning in court. Until then,,,,,,STFU!! If you open carry in an area that it's allowed, the police don't care. Sometimes they appreciate that. If you have a problem carring open, get a carry and conceal permit,,,,and ya we are still waiting for that video...you know the one where you win in court......still waiting...........

  • @brittboyer1 I can name call too, commie! Again, I don't owe you a thing! I will continue to speak my mind and if you don't like it go fuck yourself! We live in a free country for now, which means you have the right to be as ignorant as you want to be, in fact your government encourages it. Don't ask for a sovereigns/freemans help when the inevitable genocide occurs as it has throughout history. If you don't like what I have to say then don't waste your time reading or replying!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne got some whine to go with ur cheese...LMAO!!!!"I can say what I wanaa say and ur just.....stupid",,,,LMAO!!!!! Stay on YT, this is the only place where you have a chance in life. That is why ur on here non stop. You fail at everything else. Keep painting that target on yourself. According to you the government will come find you and eliminate you for having an opinion. Oh and if you don't like what I am saying don't reply. We already know you can't read!!!

  • @brittboyer1 You are right that arguing with a judge does not change anything but a recording a judge or cop showing contempt for the truth and then showing it to the American people does. He didn't know what the judge was going to say before he went into court but It was a safe bet that he wasn't interested in the truth, only generating revenue. How many rapes or murders went unsolved because instead of waiting in dark allies the cops were writing tickets on the interstate.

  • @4n0nym0us0ne how many murders and rapes had to wait for court dates b/c tards like u clog up the judicial system with bogus claims and arguements like this? How many cops are kept from serious crimes b/c they gotta deal with uninsured, unlicensed drivers who cause accidents? I know two cops that were killed in West Mephis AR by a son and dad who were so called soverign citizens are didn't have the proper vehicle documentation? 

  • @brittboyer1 How many? You have made my point for me. Why is their time spent on nonsense when there job is to protect us from the worst elements in society? Why do they spend their time shaking down little girls with lemonade stands for lack of a food handlers card? Why aren't they looking for rapist and murders, because there's no money in it! It's much easier to ask for a bond measure when the crime rate goes up and people are scared. Then they can invest in more cameras!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne What does it feel like to fail everytime you open your mouth? You embarrass yourself everytime you have a thought. Next time you have a thought....let it go...

  • @brittboyer1 How well did you know those two officers? How many times have you watched that same SPLC propaganda video about how dangerous sovereigns are? Did you catch the part about how our founding fathers were the first terrorists? I don't think any of them had permits for anything and I know they refused to pay the king's stamp tax which led to searches, seizures, quartering of soldiers and eventually the 3rd and 4th amendments! But, I guess you already knew that!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne I watched the video of this father and son shoot those officers dead. I don't watch soverign propaganda sorry. Instead of a video of you winning in court, post a video of you telling a cop he can't stop you or that they owe you a gozillion dollars for taking your proof on insurance....LMAO!!!!

  • @brittboyer1 i used to fight the system. then i noticed they hit me wit the max on everything i moved. shut my mouth and said yes sir to the judge and the penalties got a lot softer. ur fuckd either way. u stand up and fight u get ur legs cut off tho. ... under radar but still gotta fight somehow dunno how tho.

  • @goldnblue22 I agree with you. These guys go to court and think that acting this way works. They think the taxes we pay now are equal to the taxation the founding fathers experinced when they built this nation. Our gov is jacked up, but arguing over driving laws is idiotic. You gotta fight back, but until you find a way to win, don't be a lamb led to slaughter by getting a criminal record over traffic violations.

  • AND THE JUDGE THOUGHT AND SAID. NEVER TRY TO REASON WITH AN UNREASONABLE MAN. 30 DAYS TAKE HIM DOWN AHAH. IN THE UK, RELEASE HIM WITH APOLIGY AND GIVE HIM 100 DOLLARS OUT OF THE POOR BOX.

  • Boring!

  • fucktard if u don't understand those chrages, u don't need to drive, all ur doin is tryin to waste time, get some fuckin insurance, put ur seatbelt on, and stop tryin to get pulled over so ur dumbass can clog up the court system. and ur questions were fucking stupid, TRAFFIC LAWS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UCC!!!! "and he's yelling at me....."STFU!!!

  • @brittboyer1 Please enlighten us about UCC, Mr. Rhodes scholar! What does this not have to do with common law and the RIGHT of travel? He makes valid points about the who the "victim" was and what "damages" they are entitled to. Maybe if you spout more profanities and name calling you'll sound more intelligent. Yes, buy your government mandated insurance, wear your government mandated safety-belt, the government wants to help you! Right this way, FEMA is hear to provide!!! LOL!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne maybe if you showed a video of any of these so called freemen or soverigns or moors you would actually make sense. I doubt you could ever sound more intelligent. Don't wear ur seatbelt. We'd love for you to go through the windshield. You won't be missed. Having insurance and a drivers license is about being responsible for your actions. If you had an accident how would u pay for the damages you cause? You woudln't you'd try to wesel out of any responsibility. Have fun walking...

  • @brittboyer1 You keep asking for video, do you not read? First, I never mentioned "freemen", or "moors" whoever they are (same Moors that conquered Spain I assume). "I doubt you could ever sound more intelligent." I'm glad you recognized greatness when you hear it. I always wear a seatbelt because it is a great invention and costs nothing, I just don't like being told what to do like a child! If your idea is worth anything, you don't have to force it on people, they will steal it!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne don't flatter urself. Your the idiot who thinks this stuff works in court. Still waiting for a video of a soverign winning in court....not getting my hopes up. Until then enjoy walking.....

  • @4n0nym0us0ne Just show one video of a soverign, freeman or moor WINNING a court ruling instead of just arguing...go ahead we'll wait.....

  • I too thought it would be simple enough to answer your questions, but after hearing them, I don't think its the judges job to give you a law education. It would be a tremendous amount of waste of time and money. I only have a rudimentary knowledge of law and these questions were silly. I do believe that this is why lawyers are provided for free in criminal cases.

  • glad to know "law abiding" citizens are obtaining illegal recordings and posting them on youtube. was there no court recorder you could subpoena?

  • Judge dont give shit about your questions. He just wants your money, period.

    Come on stupid citizens, open your wallet, the cities are broken and they need money, money, money.

    As for your rights, they dont care and the judges act like procecutors. THEY are the criminals.

  • time for the people to take the CRIMINAL judges OUT of the system

  • @Veloce3 It will NEVER happen. That's a fact. It will only get worse. You have no power.

  • @Viktir666 :we'll see!..........;-)

  • Sub titles would be nice

  • cops, judges, and prosecuters belong in the same place as snitches

  • Most NJ Judges are Pricks who have no right sitting on the Bench!

  • The fagtard at the beginning with the cartoon bubble & annimated voice over SERIOUSLY demeans the validity of ALL the videos I've watched with him in them.

    He obviously thinks his self-perceived whitty humor makes people pay attention to what he's saying, but in my opinion, he subliminally decreases the viewers perception of the seriousness of the video while trying to be a ham & bring attention to himself !

    Love the intention of the videos ... hate the hammy fag !

  • seriously remove that gay face at the start YOU LOOK LIKE A TOSSER SERIOUSLY.

  • Dude when the judge back down you should have just dismissed the charges

  • I'm greatful people like this put their actions on the net...It sure seems like the judge is acting as a prosecuting attorney...

  • @jjssccpphhdd in the police state of tn you are judged guilty when you enter the court room the only thing to be settled is how much money are the NAZIS going to legally steal from you.you can plead not guilty and ask for a jury trial it will be denied.in the police state of tn a officers word is golden the defendants word is not taken as truth as you will be judged guilty.any witnesses for the defendant will also be taken as not true only the officers word is considers as true.

  • @jjssccpphhdd this dude is an instigator. How can he not know these answers if he knows these questions. he is an A-hole.

  • We vote for these judges......

  • Jesus christ, this guy is a moron! The judge asked one simple question, are you guilty or innocent. This is a fool and a simpleton.

  • @pupilofreality you need to listen, and you also need to understand the law. he is not a simpleton, he is asking questions, and the judge is not answering him. he is asking for the judge to explain the charge, and he is not able to. the judge is relying on the process to charge this man, and thats not the law.

  • @Ianjcarroll

    The judge is not prosecuting him, the D.A. is. All the judge wants to know is if he wants to plead guilty or defend himself later. It's only complicated at this point if you don't know what the hell is happening, clearly this guy doesn't.

  • @pupilofreality please learn the law then you will understand why he is not pleading dickhead!

  • @chipareu Yeah, we can tell what kind of discourse you would try to bring into a courtroom. This is exactly why the judge was telling him he needed a lawyer, He clearly doesn't understand what the court is asking of him. Are you admitting guilt or defending yourself against these charges, the court tells him the charges. It's really that simple. A man who defends himself without counsel has a fool for a client. As for you, Chiparoo, your a crass and vulgar fail troll.

  • @pupilofreality if you please guilt or innocense you de facto are affirming the rectitude of the charges. you are a fool

  • @astrodaise1 You don't know what you're talking about, excused.

  • “Each... person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

  • An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145

  • “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306.

  • when I get pulled over, I always make the cop aware that I know my rights, dealing with stops, searches, detainment,etc. unfortunetly they are gonna make your life hard, if you want to invoke your rights, its built into the system and they know that, I beat everything I am ever charged with, eventually, but there is a cost associated with it, so if you want to keep your rights you will have to stand up, and deal with the built in mechanisms that are designed in their favor,

  • Driving is a commercial term and is a privilege. Traveling is a right.

  • Look, I agree 100% with the premise. Sadly, it is far easier to pay the ticket. These guys are criminals, let the babies have a few pieces of their worthless paper and call it a lesson. Giving them your time, which is far more precious than their paper is just not worth it. It's just not worth the aggravation. You are brave to face the demon though. Until every single person who gets a ticket confronts the courts inc. we will continue to be screwed over.

  • There fckin vampires that suck of the hardworkin people that are just tryin to survive its disgusting we allow these monsters to enforce laws, innocent till proven guilty??? more like guilty till proven innocent

  • ITS all a game learn the cheats of the system and stop blaming everyone that u dont know how to own a judge by words and laws

  • I had a man judge that was probably suffering from PMS threaten me with a judgement that I knew was wrong. I requested another judge. It all worked out - but judges can be dicks too. Imperfect system...

  • If the damaged party is the State of New Jersey, what is he doing in a local court? Whatever happened to "Separation of Powers?"

  • all i can say is: Danny is fucking awesome.

  • Here is the answer. YOU CAN"T WIN THE GAME UNTIL YOU UNDERSTAND THE RULES!!! If you would like to state something for the record, always say, "for the record", and then state what you would like. If the judge keeps interupting, say " I request for manditory judicial note for the record", the judge must let you speak.  If you dont know the game, they will take advantage of you. It's not enough to have the evidence, you must know how to control the court. And the only way is learn the rules.

  • You need to sneak a pen with both audio and video in it, and give it to some news crew.

  • Good Job, great way to puttem on the spot perfect, the state is a fiction and cannot be injured this is a court of fiction, they are all liars and commit fraud daily

  • Anyone that's interested in reclaiming the homestead act with me living free and no taxes P.M. me. As this was taken away from us but, if we have enough people say 15-20 or more people claim land that were meant for us without paying a penny then living off the land slowly other's will do the same and it will spread like a virus showing to corrupted government and corporations that they can't control us any longer. Stop being there slaves and wake the *uck up

  • This is...so, so fucked up. Just listening to this is making me angry! I mean...the guy was so respectful and in his right to clarify any questions that he has about the charges or the nature of the charges against him. This judge is simply an impatient bully who doesn't want to have to actually do his job. I mean...they barely let him speak! How much longer are we going to tolerate this?!

  • @TheWalrus001 you foolish. what could the guy not understand?

  • @TheWalrus001 I just heard a whiner cry about "umm I don't understand the charges..." over and over again. My 7 yr old knows u gotta wear ur seatbelt, have insurance and a driver's license. If he truly didn't understand he's not mentally capible of driving a motor vehicle. He can "travel" by foot...

  • @brittboyer1 Now I get it, you and your little fag hag IGNANT4LIFE like to gangbang on freethinkers. It sounds like the indoctrination of your 7 yr old is off to a great start. It's sad that your child will end up paying for your sheepishness. They will Bah all the way to the gas chambers. Seriously, you are the poster child for the necessity of forced sterilization. Under Goi/Goyim in the globalist dictionary it says: see you!

  • @4n0nym0us0ne I bet your parents are tired of you living in their basement. Come on what are you 24 25 ot 35 still living at home. It's funny how upset you get when we ask that you post a video of a soverign winning in court. I'd like you to find even a written court decision of this crap working in court. Your only response has been...WHHHIINNEEE I DON"T OWE U NYTHING,,,WHHHIIINNNEEEE<<CCRR­RRYYY...Boo fucking hooo....hey ur mom called she wants her vagina back

  • i cant believe what ive just heard

    how currupt do they have to get before something is done!!

    what about all the innocent people who have to pay these illegal fines

    there bullys/they know there in the wrong and cover themslves

    this should be on the front page of the news!

  • Comment removed

  • good questions, sure why not, hire an attorney for 4-5k and he'll talk for you. The judge is not there to help you, the attorney is. It's not fair, but when they go golfing this weekend and the judge has his golf fees, drinks and massage with the "happy ending" paid for out of the fees you paid to your attorney, they can discuss letting you off with a "lesser penalty" if you plea to something.

  • The Judge answering a question with threats ? is this not attempted extortions ?

    Why Cant The Judge understand English ,what aRe The Nature of The Charges ?

    note:The Judge just Entered a Plea .

    The Judge cant understand a simple question ? He should be the one tested?

    common law

    criminal ? the damaged party is the state ? Where is the evidence ?

    BUY THERE TAPES ...THATS EXTORTION ! + its not open to cameras tape etc...

    Lawer licenced by the state! Hire one of there guys under there licence ?

  • @canadastreetmedia wrote:

    1. "Lawer licenced by the state! Hire one of there guys under there licence?"

    NO! Represent yourselves and keep losing, losing, losing, case after case after case.

    2. "The Judge cant understand a simple question ? He should be the one tested?"

    Actually, if FreeStaters have a theory of government and courts they should be honest enough and have enough integrity to argue their theory and make their objections rather than playing childish word games - but they don't.

    SAD.

  • What a bitchy little faggot this person he is. The judge wasn't violent at all. I think he had a lot of restraint from this smart-ass douche bag that was trying to manipulate the system with rhetoric. He got tickets and he doesn't want to pay them. Fucking shithead...

    

  • @weirdowaldo

    You are a slave. Be a good little boy and pay your extortion...I mean taxes, fees and fines.

  • @lukejaden1 I didn't get the tickets, you idiot!! I don't get what this fucking whiner is kicking about. Who cares about the nature of the charges? If he was doing what he wasn't supposed to, he shouldn't try to weasel his way out of it. Unless, of course, he is a weasel. Kind of sounds like one....

  • @weirdowaldo

    Ok Troll. People are "whiners" because they protect their right (not privilege ) to travel?

    Hey, maybe you are a dumb pussy who takes whatever you are "told" by the "government".

    Maybe you are a brainwashed family member of a judge or cop or other government official. Who knows.

    Do what you are told by the "authorities" and be happy. Idiot lol.

  • @lukejaden1 Ok moron! This is the last time I am engaging you because you are boring me. I am not opposed to people speaking up for their rights and free speech. What I do despise are people who try to use these tactics to absolve themselves of any wrong doing. Only a pussy would try to weasel out of punishment when breaking the law. Man up, for fucks sake and stop being a fucking baby. Unless you are championing anarchy: If that's the case, I'll be the first to blast your ass out of this realm.

  • @weirdowaldo Have it your way jackass. Funny how the guy didn't have to pay the tickets.

    You know shit. The guy harmed no one. Speeding is not a crime idiot. He didn't even endanger a life in any way.

    Not everyone is as big of a head-up-his ass pussy when it comes to their rights.

    When a bullshit charge happens to you, you'll cry and wish someone like this man would use what he knows to help you.

    if you are so against it why are you here anyway Troll?

  • @weirdowaldo You mean , what a polite person trying to get a simple question answered by something else than threats. Knowing you're legally right helps to recognize these situations. No wonder you didn't understand this , just because you don't understand why he's arguing , you automatically get angered by such intelligence and try to lower him down. Classic.

  • This idiot is being a smart-ass! I think this guy should be thrown in jail.

  • The judge is right. This driver is an idiot. If I was the judge I would take his lic. This guy is the dumbest person I have heard. This guy should not ever drive.

  • The judge is right. This driver is an idiot. If I was the judge I would take his lic.

  • Yeah- I'm all for civil disobedience. I'm all for 'talking back' if you have just reason, but this guy sounds like a dumbass and he's not really making a good case.

  • @electronicoffee You have no idea what just happened do you?

  • @ekultus Listen up DUMBFUCK. I know exactly the game he's trying to play. Some states have traffic tickets as 'civil' infractions, not criminal so people think they can get out of them by saying "I signed this under duress" (as a. it's civil, b. the officer has a gun on his waist and won't let you go until you sign). That's why it was so important for him to get the man to say 'It's Civil".that shit doesn't fly and it never will unless the law is changed. It's revenue for the state, so it won't.

  • @electronicoffee I was a lawyer's assistant for years and I've met many dumbfucks like this dude in the video who try and make this case and FAIL HARD because they are up against either a ten year legal case they cannot afford, or they make their case poorly and fail like this dude did.

  • @electronicoffee How did my question offend you so badly? Anyways no that's not what this video is about. No need to reply you fat jew fuck.

  • @ekultus NICE RACISM DUMBFUCK: I'm spanish and german. I'm not a jew, you FUCKING RETARD. But whatever, you're obviously some racist tea party dumbfuck anyways. YOU HAVE INVALIDATED EVERYTHING YOU JUST SAID. #FAIL

  • @electronicoffee I have power over you, see how I got you to give out personal info... Anyways Jews are not a race. Only low IQ retards with self esteem issues lash out like you do and worry about the validity of arguments with total strangers. I could care less but guess what, you care. Piss off.

  • @ekultus WRONG DUMBFUCK. "My Race" isn't 'personal information', you fucking RETARD! LOL!! Jews ARE a race, you stupid twat. Jewish is a RACE, Judaism is a religion. How fucking ignorant are you? Sound like SOMEONE never went to college. Low IQ? Sorry, DUMBFUCK, I'm genius+ level, which is far higher than about 1 in 1,000 people, so your ASSUMPTIONS just show you're a DUMBFUCK. Piss off? Sorry DUMBFUCK, but you are the one failing to provide any real proof or intelligence here. You are so sad <3

  • @electronicoffee

    I would think someone with a genius IQ would have a better vocabulary than that but then again, on the internet you can pretend to be anything you want to be.

  • @ThePartiboi WRONG DUMBFUCK. I do have an extensive vocabulary, but just because I have $100 in my pocket doesn't mean I have to spend it. Just because I'm ridiculously smart and well-educated, doesn't mean I have to choose grandiose and flowery words because you're a spoiled cunt who probably had their mother wipe your ass for the first six years of your life. You show an obvious LACK of intelligence if you cannot discern between VOCABULARY and INTELLIGENCE with MANNERS. Fuck manners.

  • @electronicoffee

    Point proven

  • This Judge is not a trained expert in psychology how could he determine on his own if this fellow is fit to drive a car?

  • The judge should have just chrged him with contempt and had him thrown in Jail after the first couple of minutes of arguing. This guy is fucking Moron.

  • @Ben85paintball We already lost our freedoms. I came here 25 years ago from communist regime and to be completely truthful, I am very frustrated with how this system got corrupted into what we have now. Vertainly, what we have now is no freedom at all. The more I study this, the more I am starting to see that I went to look for freedom into wrong country.

  • Wow, ok yah... the judge definitely had a bit of a temper problem but I can totally see where he's coming from. How do you NOT understand the nature of the charges? REALLY? What kind of nonsense is that? And you want to represent yourself? You have a fool for a client and a little knowledge is a DANGEROUS thing.

  • @StarwasterPrime

    According to the supreme court, only a judge or attorney is capable of understanding legalese.

  • boot this judge out. mr god like

  • Def: Ask the judge: Can I get a fair trial?

    Jdg: Yes.

    Def: If there is a conflict of interest can I get a fair trial?

    Jdg:No.

    Def:Who do you represent

    Jdg: Next question (or he will get flustered and irate.)

    He may say "The State of Ohio,"

    Def: The State of Ohio is the plaintiff and thus there is a conflict of interest and you need to recuse yourself.

    If the judge enters a plea for the def without the def's permission, ask: Are you now attempting to represent me? watch?v=9n7SkFIUw1U

  • @zonsb I saw a vid where a guy says this exact same thing and the judge responded "that's what the Appellate Court is for". It's rigged top to bottom it seems.

  • @ekultus In the big picture government is men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. They've given themselves "licenses" to kill. We don't. We interact voluntarily and thus have no need for licenses to kill.They don't interact voluntarily and thus their need for their licenses to kill.

  • Taxes are compulsory, Pay up or we'll put you in a cage. Tax is politically correct term for theft. Jail is politically correct term for cage. Pet birds and animals at the zoo are kept in cages. Compulsory taxation means government has no voluntary support. Government is men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. Read Marc Stevens' book, Adventures in Legal Land.

  • You gotta be careful what you threaten on here.....these pages are scanned by the authorities. One guy was locked up in Cali for making threats!!! what a free country uh?

  • We as a collective society have allowed it to come to this. Things that should be called to one's attention for safety purposes are serious violations calling for court appearances, heave fines, and jail. Speeding, seat belts,improper changing of lanes are just some of the traffic violations alone. Safety has nothing to do with anything!! It's all about MONEY & CONTROL over the SHEEPLE. Where do you find the seat belt law most broken?? SCHOOL BUSSES!! Where is the concern for safety here???

  • Cops & judges don't ask--they order & command.

  • I don't understand why a free citizen in a court of law is not allowed to ask questions about a legal proceeding. This judge should be marched out of the courtroom, stripped of his bench and smacked!

  • mmm-seems as though this is stepping all over greywolf424s' hero worship or something. What an ignorant nut.

  • @thegreatfish

    Actually, driving WOULD be a common right. It is the manner of conveyance that was uncommon. No one ever had their right to "drive", a term used to reference directing a number of animals, removed. And once the MANNER of conveyance became common, so then was conveyed the extension of the right to "drive". The "governments" roads are the roads of "we the people", and as such, are OUR roads to begin with, built and paid for by OUR dollar.

  • @Kriegar1964 "driving WOULD be a common righ" . WRONG . "No one ever had their right to "drive", a term used to reference directing a number of animals, removed. " . NOT ANYMORE.... LAWS CHANGE TO MEET THE TIMES. . "built and paid for by OUR dollar. " . NO, BUILT AND PAID FOR BY TAX PAYERS, WHICH RULES YOU OUT
  • @greywolf424

    YOU meet the times, IDIOT. Obviously, definition 222222222222 came BEFORE definition ONE, and, as I asserted, I maintain. The change was made in the LAW, not the reality of the situation. The change was made as a matter of convenience relative to the change in the manner of conveyance.

  • @Kriegar1964 ", definition 222222222222 came BEFORE definition ONE, "

    .

    LAME ASS COP OUT.... BUT LAWS ARE CHANGED TO MEET THE TIMES AND ONLY DEFINITION 222222222222 APPLIES IN THE COURTS TODAY.

    .

    "The change was made in the LAW, not the reality of the situation. "

    .

    WRONG ASSHOLE.... WHICH IS WHY RETARDS LIKE YOU CONTINUE TO LOSE IN COURT AND YOU ALWAYS WILL.

  • @greywolf424

    Nooo. You are wrong, and are obviously a "fucktard" who cannot intelligently convey a clear thought as in a fashion that could make you appear to be a reasonable person.

    Further, I am hardly mentally disabled, nor do I "lose in court". Regardless of how YOU may see any of this, entering into a courtroom is a negotiating process that started before you got there, and much of this is up for debate, even if you aren't in possession of the intelligence required to understand that.

  • @Kriegar1964 I AM NOT WRONG FUCKTARD. .... THE DEFINITION OF A DRIVER HAS CHANGED TO FIT THE TIMES.... WHICH IS WHY UNEDUCATED ASSHOLES LIKE YOU LOSE IN COURT EVERY SINGLE TIME.

  • @Kriegar1964 WHICH IS WHY FUCKING IDIOTS LIKE YOU LOSE ALL THE TIME.

  • @Kriegar1964 ACCORDING TO BLACK'S LAW (9TH EDITION) WHICH DEFINES COMMON LAW TERMS:

    .

    driver: 1. A PERSON who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A PERSON who herds animals; a drover

    .

    WHICH IS WHY FUCKTARDS LIKE YOU LOSE IN COURT EVERY SINGLE TIME.

  • @greywolf424

    The only "fucktard" here is you. Profanity is the crutch of the linguistically challenged.

  • @Kriegar1964 If roads are the roads of "we the people", then they are public roads. As public roads, the public may regulate their usage, and the public has. One regulation the public has applied to roads is that no one may drive on them without a license. Unless you can point to a federal law or an article of the constitution that would preempt the state's right to regulate their own roads, there's no reason why the state cannot require a license.

  • @thegreatfish The "public" wasn't the one who made the licensing laws, that was the government in the absence of a public vote, just like THOUSANDS of other laws that have been passed without the public having any say about it whatsoever.

  • @NinjaRider777R It was created through representation. We elected representatives who created the laws. If we don't like the laws they create, we put pressure on them to change those laws or we vote in someone else. There are numerous reasons why representative government is considered preferable to direct democracy in certain circumstances and this is discussed at length in the federalist papers.