Rush Limbaugh? Beats me. Michael Moore, on the other hand, just sought to bring the American public the truth, and concentrate our attention on the "con" in "neocon". He's my hero...and I mean that.
someone mentioned breadcrumbs and is oblivious to the fact that they are full...and have a consumed an entire loaf from the rightists...moore is a sensationalist sure, but so is the right and the teeter totter effect does provide a nice balance sometime...
I'm using Mr. Moore's site to ask this because I know he doesn't believe in censorship and is firm believe in free of speech and the truth no matter what that is.
Does anyone have problem with some postings that says "your comment has been posted! It will be visible once it is approved" I get this a lot on pro religious and politic videos; in my experience these never get shown. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Can any of you cite and source one deception? I admit Fahrenheit 9/11 was an editorial. Is expressing yourself suddenly "anti-american?" Expressing an opinion is not the same thing as stating a fact. Movies are inherently subjective, anyway.
michael moore himself implied that he wasn't fair in making 911, but that he had an agenda on the daily show. john stewart asked him if he was fair in making the movie. and it's pretty well known in newspapers and mainstream media news that he was deceptive
it was a one-sided film, this is why it wasn't fair, but if you ignore the facts then you are a fool, i personally think he could of done much better and pointed out so many more negatives about our governemnet and 911 if he tried harder.
It's unfortunate that such lazy and under-educated people decide to voice their angry and illogical opinions, but that is the price we must suffer for democracy in this country. If you want the truth then let's exchange facts, but if you merely wanna sling mud & progressive thought jokes, then by all means join the ranks of the conservative fan base.
I visited that site posted in the previous message and its completely unconvincing. There are absolutely no disproving facts, nor suggestive facts that would otherwise lead to alternative answers. It basically uses terms like "Moore suggests" or "Moore neglected to address." The problem with these assertions are that they don't disprove anything, they only prove that Moore has an opinion and that the author of the article disagrees.
No matter how he presents his facts, they are cold and hard. You can not disprove facts. You cant debate the reputation America has over shit that they have done, but u can't dispute the fact that they did and continue to do these things.
youre right - you cant disprove his facts, the thing is there are hardly any real FACTS! most of his movies are just a bunch of clips edited and put together to imply all sorts of things, basically misleading his audience who seem to lap up whatever he says without thinking. Oh, and he's not funny either.
But think about it. If half of it didnt happen, he would have been shutdown from the get go. He has interviewed people and done plenty of things to show you hes not being fake. If you go look up on your own half the things the U.S. has done to other countries, you will see what hes talking about.
This planet is doomed man...read a book, watch the news, learn from other countries. We're no better than you, just more informed. You'll kill us all.
What I want to know is why is being critical of your government considered anti-American? whats the point of democracy if you can't question your government?
It's like the hollowness behind every politician who said "make flag-burning illegal". I felt like voting against every politician who'd rather defend a symbol-- a piece of cloth-- than defend the right it's supposed to represent. That's like divorcing Cameron Diaz so you can get married to her photo.
This guy does not question the government, he slanders it and lies about important topics for which he has no inside knowledge about. Anyone can cut and paste media footage to make it say what ever they want. This guy is an oxygen thief, hope he dies of cholesterol.
This is a totalitarian rant Hitler would have been proud of. Your problem starts when what is said is backed by EVIDENCE, as opposed to the reasons for going to war that Bush cited. Something Moore made great efforts to clearly point out before, during & after. My guess is you're just mad for sucking up all those lies.
A President must act on information given to him by his security advisers, if the president didnt react to the intel that he recived saying that the US was in danger then he would not have been doing his job. You are just a left wing brain-washed idiot who belives everything that he sees on TV. Wake up a get with reality.
What planet have you been on? There was no threat, there never was. Its why Hans Blix resigned. Colin Powell said as much just a few days ago. "a blot on my career" he called it. George Kay head of the US investigation said the same. I believe little of what the TV tells me - this seems to be more your problem.
So you would have watched when Colin powell sat at the UN and gave a speach in which he stated Saddam had WMD. You are a selective political observer. Michael moore is an big mouth who himself has sold out the indipendent film industry that gave him his start in the first place. You are just a far left hippy. Thank god that there are more people like me over on the right and less loosers on the left who like michael moore think they know it all, when they really only know shit.
Well done! Now OZ & The US has the Patriot Act, Exactly what Churchill fought the Nazis to prevent. The US knew Sadam once 'had' WMD's because they sold him them, even when they knew he was murdering Kurds. You destroyed Iraq with 10yrs of bombing & sanctions after GW1 and now you've 'Liberated?' the place its WORSE than when Sadam had it. Thank god you guys are in charge! You must be so proud!
Very proud, thanks. And isnt it great that you have the right to say the shit that you people say. Because when Saddam was in power you would have been killed for your veiws. Michael moore would have been dead before he even got running or rolling which ever way you look at it.
Mate - Despite what George Bush & Howard tell you Sadam was never close to being in control of anything - Australia or the US. He was in 'power' of nothing - the only reason Iraq was invaded! The patriot acts mean Howard can kill you for your views (lookin forward to that). Glad to see you are proud of the mess in Iraq, they are only human beings after all!
As I stated, the president must as it is his obligation, act on any intelligence given to him and his cabinet. Even if there is a possibility it wont be true. If the chance of it being true is advised to the president he must act to prevent it happening. Iraq was justified because the intelligence is what all governments act on. If Bush didnt act on that intelligence he would not be doing his job.
Total rubbish. The WMD situation was as contrived as the Links to Al Qaeda. There wasn't any of either. They created the 'intelligence', many of their own hi ranking staff have said so. Like Hans Blix said,"how can you be 100% certain of the existance of WMD's and 0% certain of their whereabouts?". Its a rort to control the oil. Get used to it.
That last statement sounded like your scratching at the barrell, because you really don't have the facts. You listen to CNN and other left wing news networks. Face the fact your self, President bush executed the duties of the president without hesitation. Which is why his was elected president by the US people. If you want to live under a failure of a government move to mexico.
CNN left wing? ROLMAO! Facts? Make a break with habit and state one! The duties of President? 50 million people in the worlds richest coutry can't afford health care. The World Health Organisation ranks care in the US 37, Saudi Arabia is 27! Face facts? you don't know what one is!
you live in a dream world. It would be great to have everything but unfortunately it ain't the case. Learn to live with it because when bush goes the next president dem or rep will be just as arrogant.
You have from start to finish not provided a single scrap of evidence to back up your rolling assertions and insults. The only thing I'm inclined to agree on is the next product of America's joke democracy. You have said precisley nothing. Time to put up or shut up.
you get your proof from CNN and the media, gee that must be true. The bottom line is that the president has an obligation to act on the intelligence given to him, he did that so I dont see how you can critisize him. get some loyalty about you.
soldier of doom, rise up from the ashes of gloom, found through experience is the way upon which I often reflected and theorised, war equals death and death equals peace, splinters of doubt make ones mind spin, like O reilly on fox news continues to loose and not win...
His contributions would upset what people? What kind of donations does he make?
lazydogs 4 years ago
I am amazed how Michael Moore hasnt ditched America's ass and moved over here to Canada.
InoBecka 5 years ago
Rush Limbaugh? Beats me. Michael Moore, on the other hand, just sought to bring the American public the truth, and concentrate our attention on the "con" in "neocon". He's my hero...and I mean that.
sethness1 5 years ago
Michael Moore and Ryan Eashoo don't just get it.
Its like they should move to Canada.
CHICAGOGUY555 5 years ago
grande michael
JuanluDoktaiz 5 years ago
Michael Moore is a cunt.
RoffleWaffle223 5 years ago
He's fat.
Chrissius 5 years ago
someone mentioned breadcrumbs and is oblivious to the fact that they are full...and have a consumed an entire loaf from the rightists...moore is a sensationalist sure, but so is the right and the teeter totter effect does provide a nice balance sometime...
jeremyw66 5 years ago
I'm using Mr. Moore's site to ask this because I know he doesn't believe in censorship and is firm believe in free of speech and the truth no matter what that is.
Does anyone have problem with some postings that says "your comment has been posted! It will be visible once it is approved" I get this a lot on pro religious and politic videos; in my experience these never get shown. Can anyone shed some light on this?
P. S I really liked Mr. Moore's Super Size Me!
loveallthepeople 5 years ago
Sorry to pop your bubble man, but super size me was not michael moore, lol, even though it seems like his kind of documentary
CritikRivueuz 5 years ago
I guess that side of British humour doesn't travel very well
loveallthepeople 5 years ago
michael moore speaks the truth
tallie84 5 years ago
Michael Moore is a Big Fat Idiot (and other observations...)
mlex169 5 years ago
Can any of you cite and source one deception? I admit Fahrenheit 9/11 was an editorial. Is expressing yourself suddenly "anti-american?" Expressing an opinion is not the same thing as stating a fact. Movies are inherently subjective, anyway.
paulie1 5 years ago
michael moore himself implied that he wasn't fair in making 911, but that he had an agenda on the daily show. john stewart asked him if he was fair in making the movie. and it's pretty well known in newspapers and mainstream media news that he was deceptive
gamestopnate 5 years ago
newspapers and mainstream media - lol? are you actually stupid enough to listen to them and believe what they say?
thesanders 5 years ago
it was a one-sided film, this is why it wasn't fair, but if you ignore the facts then you are a fool, i personally think he could of done much better and pointed out so many more negatives about our governemnet and 911 if he tried harder.
displaced36 5 years ago
"If half of it didnt happen, he would have been shutdown from the get go. "
Really? Is this a scientific statement or can you pull anything else out of your anus?
If you want intelligent discussions on facts, Michael Moore films are hardly the place to begin. Clever editing hardly constitutes honest filmmaking.
It's too bad so many people are so hungry with their hate they will eat the breadcrumbs he lays out.
SurecureX 5 years ago
"they only prove that Moore has an opinion..."
So why are his films called documentaries if they are editorials?
"59 deciets has been debunked."
But 59 Deceits hasn't been... were you trying to prove that the I before E except after C rule has been debunked too?
SurecureX 5 years ago
It's unfortunate that such lazy and under-educated people decide to voice their angry and illogical opinions, but that is the price we must suffer for democracy in this country. If you want the truth then let's exchange facts, but if you merely wanna sling mud & progressive thought jokes, then by all means join the ranks of the conservative fan base.
VenomOXP 5 years ago
I visited that site posted in the previous message and its completely unconvincing. There are absolutely no disproving facts, nor suggestive facts that would otherwise lead to alternative answers. It basically uses terms like "Moore suggests" or "Moore neglected to address." The problem with these assertions are that they don't disprove anything, they only prove that Moore has an opinion and that the author of the article disagrees.
VenomOXP 5 years ago
i dont care what yall say , this man knows how to make documentarys
WahtayProductions 5 years ago
No matter how he presents his facts, they are cold and hard. You can not disprove facts. You cant debate the reputation America has over shit that they have done, but u can't dispute the fact that they did and continue to do these things.
intraras 5 years ago
youre right - you cant disprove his facts, the thing is there are hardly any real FACTS! most of his movies are just a bunch of clips edited and put together to imply all sorts of things, basically misleading his audience who seem to lap up whatever he says without thinking. Oh, and he's not funny either.
pineappleboy1 5 years ago
But think about it. If half of it didnt happen, he would have been shutdown from the get go. He has interviewed people and done plenty of things to show you hes not being fake. If you go look up on your own half the things the U.S. has done to other countries, you will see what hes talking about.
intraras 5 years ago
michael moore should be thrown in prison for being antiamerican and then they will treat him like the bitch he is,the fat cry baby.
captianjames 5 years ago
This planet is doomed man...read a book, watch the news, learn from other countries. We're no better than you, just more informed. You'll kill us all.
DAVIDENGINE 5 years ago
what exactly is wrong with being antiamerican?
salexanderreed 5 years ago
What I want to know is why is being critical of your government considered anti-American? whats the point of democracy if you can't question your government?
ginganz13 5 years ago
I *so* agree, ginganz13. :)
It's like the hollowness behind every politician who said "make flag-burning illegal". I felt like voting against every politician who'd rather defend a symbol-- a piece of cloth-- than defend the right it's supposed to represent. That's like divorcing Cameron Diaz so you can get married to her photo.
sethness1 5 years ago
This guy does not question the government, he slanders it and lies about important topics for which he has no inside knowledge about. Anyone can cut and paste media footage to make it say what ever they want. This guy is an oxygen thief, hope he dies of cholesterol.
nathmc31 5 years ago
This is a totalitarian rant Hitler would have been proud of. Your problem starts when what is said is backed by EVIDENCE, as opposed to the reasons for going to war that Bush cited. Something Moore made great efforts to clearly point out before, during & after. My guess is you're just mad for sucking up all those lies.
ginganz13 5 years ago
A President must act on information given to him by his security advisers, if the president didnt react to the intel that he recived saying that the US was in danger then he would not have been doing his job. You are just a left wing brain-washed idiot who belives everything that he sees on TV. Wake up a get with reality.
nathmc31 5 years ago
What planet have you been on? There was no threat, there never was. Its why Hans Blix resigned. Colin Powell said as much just a few days ago. "a blot on my career" he called it. George Kay head of the US investigation said the same. I believe little of what the TV tells me - this seems to be more your problem.
ginganz13 5 years ago
So you would have watched when Colin powell sat at the UN and gave a speach in which he stated Saddam had WMD. You are a selective political observer. Michael moore is an big mouth who himself has sold out the indipendent film industry that gave him his start in the first place. You are just a far left hippy. Thank god that there are more people like me over on the right and less loosers on the left who like michael moore think they know it all, when they really only know shit.
nathmc31 5 years ago
Well done! Now OZ & The US has the Patriot Act, Exactly what Churchill fought the Nazis to prevent. The US knew Sadam once 'had' WMD's because they sold him them, even when they knew he was murdering Kurds. You destroyed Iraq with 10yrs of bombing & sanctions after GW1 and now you've 'Liberated?' the place its WORSE than when Sadam had it. Thank god you guys are in charge! You must be so proud!
ginganz13 5 years ago
Very proud, thanks. And isnt it great that you have the right to say the shit that you people say. Because when Saddam was in power you would have been killed for your veiws. Michael moore would have been dead before he even got running or rolling which ever way you look at it.
nathmc31 5 years ago
Mate - Despite what George Bush & Howard tell you Sadam was never close to being in control of anything - Australia or the US. He was in 'power' of nothing - the only reason Iraq was invaded! The patriot acts mean Howard can kill you for your views (lookin forward to that). Glad to see you are proud of the mess in Iraq, they are only human beings after all!
ginganz13 5 years ago
As I stated, the president must as it is his obligation, act on any intelligence given to him and his cabinet. Even if there is a possibility it wont be true. If the chance of it being true is advised to the president he must act to prevent it happening. Iraq was justified because the intelligence is what all governments act on. If Bush didnt act on that intelligence he would not be doing his job.
nathmc31 5 years ago
Total rubbish. The WMD situation was as contrived as the Links to Al Qaeda. There wasn't any of either. They created the 'intelligence', many of their own hi ranking staff have said so. Like Hans Blix said,"how can you be 100% certain of the existance of WMD's and 0% certain of their whereabouts?". Its a rort to control the oil. Get used to it.
ginganz13 5 years ago
That last statement sounded like your scratching at the barrell, because you really don't have the facts. You listen to CNN and other left wing news networks. Face the fact your self, President bush executed the duties of the president without hesitation. Which is why his was elected president by the US people. If you want to live under a failure of a government move to mexico.
nathmc31 5 years ago
CNN left wing? ROLMAO! Facts? Make a break with habit and state one! The duties of President? 50 million people in the worlds richest coutry can't afford health care. The World Health Organisation ranks care in the US 37, Saudi Arabia is 27! Face facts? you don't know what one is!
ginganz13 5 years ago
you live in a dream world. It would be great to have everything but unfortunately it ain't the case. Learn to live with it because when bush goes the next president dem or rep will be just as arrogant.
nathmc31 5 years ago
You have from start to finish not provided a single scrap of evidence to back up your rolling assertions and insults. The only thing I'm inclined to agree on is the next product of America's joke democracy. You have said precisley nothing. Time to put up or shut up.
ginganz13 5 years ago
you get your proof from CNN and the media, gee that must be true. The bottom line is that the president has an obligation to act on the intelligence given to him, he did that so I dont see how you can critisize him. get some loyalty about you.
nathmc31 5 years ago
ginganz13 (6 months ago) I noticed they speak these accusations, I guess, to provide cover for their very conservative leaning.
lazydogs 4 years ago
"59 deciets has been debunked" Cite please
hendizy 5 years ago
59 deciets has been debunked. Amatuer net surfers wouldnt know this
CinemaNut 5 years ago
michael moore, yum, i love big ass liars who are just as evil as they people they bitch about :)
come on kid argue with me :)
zacafreakingriah 5 years ago
59 Deceits in F911
http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm
F911-The Temperature Moore's pants burn
http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20040702.html
poachedkippers 5 years ago
Great. I think I can point out 100 deceits on Bush's presidency.Just the second term, I mean.Open your eyes, man.
palaciodeinvierno 5 years ago
Michael Moore is a spiteful twit! LOSER!
Raiderblack 5 years ago
Just as big as the losers who bitch about him
firdaus125 5 years ago
Agreed firdaus.
JohnyJoe 5 years ago
soldier of doom, rise up from the ashes of gloom, found through experience is the way upon which I often reflected and theorised, war equals death and death equals peace, splinters of doubt make ones mind spin, like O reilly on fox news continues to loose and not win...
seraph101 5 years ago
YO TAMBIEN HARE UN VIDEO PORNO DE BUSH DONDE MUESTRE SUS DEFICIENCIAS
cabron12 5 years ago
VAMOS MIGUEL ROMPELE EL CULO A LOS GRINGOS MARICAS
cabron12 5 years ago