This is what happens when you allow Bronze Age fairy tales to dictate how we treat other human beings. There shouldn't even be a debate over the 'rights and wrongs' of gay marriage. THERE ARE NO WRONGS. The opposition to it may throw up bullshit arguments about how a kid needs a Mum and Dad, but the real reason is always and only JESUS HATES FAGGOTS. It's no longer OK to burn witches at the stake, but Christian hate will never die where gays are concerned. And that's all it is - hate.
Human rights / human wrongs . We're all here to live our lives the way we choose and to receive the results ( or the consequences ) of what we choose to do . If people have the right to promote and protect a gay lifestyle without criticism then others should have a right to promote and protect a non-gay lifestyle too and not be labelled ' homophobic ' because of it . We've all got the same rights (and wrongs ) to deal with .. and let's all remember we don't just live in sin - sin lives in us .
There is bigger issues atm, nobody is arresting people based on their sexual endeavours. Civil partnership is offered to everybody. Perhaps an improvement in employment rights and tax reform will have a greater effect on more people.
I'm from the U.S. and I find this strange and sad. You don't have freedom of conscious in Europe anymore? Because you merely don't support homosexual relationships you're subject to lawful consequence?
What the heck happened over there?! Thought and language as a criminal act, do the English really support this???
Public law is is just that and so long as not on public ground no parliamentary act applies. As when not on public ground I can not break a law I do not believe in.
For example cannabis has never been illegal to grow so long as public accessibility can only be achieved by breaking into private grounds, and that is not where it ends with the UK Government. As morality reins supreme in the supreme court extradition orders which don't require evidence are illegal as one's belief can not be used in legal proceedings.
Was he having an off-day? As someone who has spoken publicly about contentious issues on numerous occasions, I understand the need to choose one's words wisely, but Cameron comes across as simply unprepared, as if he never even thought about this subject.
Many people who consider themselves homosexual or "gay" choose to build their identity around that particular behavior, that one aspect of their lives.
They confuse their sexual behavior with their sense of self, so that if anyone disapproves of their behavior (homosexuality) then it's seen as a personal attack.
The word "homosexual" is more accurate than the word "gay" because it actually describes the behavior/relationship being discussed.
@lightandbeautiful What the hell are you talking about, that made no sense whatsoever, were you smoking crack when you typed this bullshit. What particular Behaviour are you referring too ? Homosexuals or "they" as you refer don't confuse anything and they don't build their identity around anything other than themselves. If that was an attempt to sound intelligent you failed on a massive scale.
@Azureecosse he/she is a moron and i have no clue what they are talking about for 99% of that, BUT i do know what he means with the top line, i know 1 gayman who doesnt have anything in his life other than 'gay things'.
he will only:
see gay films,
go to gay bars,
talkabout tv shows with gay men in them, if you mention something he will bring it around to how it is 'gay' he doesn't have anything else in his life such as hobbies etc, but i don't know ANY other gay men like that
@lightandbeautiful How many LGBT people do you know, just out of curiosity? How many have you actually talked to at length? I'm gay, and have many LGBT friends, and we all have careers, hobbies, and a diverse number of political causes we care about. As for your other comments, it seems to me that YOU are the one overly concerned with our sexuality, as people like you are seemingly pathologically obsessed with attacking us because of it, when we would just like to be treated like equal citizens.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "gay" has helped homosexual activists push their dishonest agenda on unsuspecting people.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
My comment below was neither "dishonest" nor "anti-gay".
Again, the word "gay", according to famous atheist Richard Dawkins, was "hijacked" by "homosexual activists". Those are his words, in context. I have the short one-minute video clip on my channel, and you can watch it for yourself.
The word "homosexual" is more accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the attraction/behavior/relationshiop being discussed.
@lightandbeautiful, of course you will allege anything you have to, in order to spread your anti-gay agenda. That is understood. I'm just pointing out that anyone educated and rational won't fall for it.
@GodCreatesGays2 i don't think he is anti gay, just a little silly.
I think i can sort of see what he is saying, i think he means homosexual is the term for same sex relationships whereas 'gay' has come to be used to discribe the scene(in his eyes)?
like you wouldn't say 'i'm going to a homosexual bar' you say 'gay bar' because it's a term that encompasses the whole scene.
thats the best sence i can make of it, so if it's not that then i have no fucking idea what he is on about
everyone knows the conservatives don't exactly go hand in hand with the aspirations of the common people. but we also have to understand that the only reason we need them to begin with is because labour is corrupt. the way they spend money is as if we found our wealth is a bin bag. we should not be irresponsible with discipline like the conservatives, or just damn right foolish like labour. labour created the grounds for this economical crisis in UK. we should have been like France and Germany.
@antinazicholos5 because you are straight!!!!!!! haha Gays prefer the other way around. Nobody wants you think anyway, just respect other individuals. Equal human rights, nothing more!
the ACLU says NAMBLA have the right to teach the American ppl how to have sex with children. If you say this is not supporting pedophilia, then wtf is this?
@seanrlynch76 polygamy could come first, then pedophilia, the age of consent will be reduced gradually, i dont think liberals will support bestiality ever because many of them are animal rights activists, its hard to believe but liberals have morals too.
What is the position about HUMAN RIGHTS - do they not count?
No Human Rights exist in the Crown Dependency of JERSEY - outside the UK - but a constituent part of the British Isles - the Number ONE Tax Haven - Britain ensures NO Human Rights in that CORRUPT island where the ex senior Crown Officer was Governor of the Public Sector Home Haut de la Garenne where the most senior Judge oversaw the Paedophile paradise of a Public Sector home. His younger brother protected him as AttorneyGeneral.
God forbid MPs get to vote with their own conscience. It's called democracy you idiots. Do you really want leaders dictating to their MPs how to vote?
You people wouldn't know democracy if it hit you in the face.
@TheBluePianist Bottom line is people commenting here think Cameron would wrong to allow a free vote. That's dictatorial, a free vote would be far more democratic.
as a scale between dictatorial and democratic, then yes, and it is morally wrong, since the morality of the subject is independent. this is why we have rights (are liberal) in our democracy, and voting on a subject relating to the right would go against the system.
@TheBluePianist So who will decide 'human rights' then? The lobbyists and the powerful banking and corporate backers of the politicians? The European Commission? The UN?
@haz464 all politicians are liars, robbing each country for the elite rich powerful families, they are taking away our basic rights who said they could own all the land water and air and decide what they can pollute ,destroy. everyone should be held accountable from the london rioters(4yrs for a bottle of water) to the banks and big corporations (400trillion anyone?) this planet is being destroyed not because of too many people but due to the few greedy kleptomaniacs running the show
I support conservatives, but fancy going to an interview where the topic is likely to be gay rights and not knowing an answer, he's as useless as those Labour MPs and Liberal nutters.
They need to give a fucking honest answer not all this 'NOT SURE, DUNNO SORRY ILL THINK OF SOMETHING'
All the focus of the interview is on how the reply sounds, not answering the questions about the vote. Yet another proof, if needed, that they don't care about the content, just the appearances and getting re-elected.
@ForeverComplaining We dont want someone like Margeret Thatcher becasue she was a cold hearted vampire and the working class, back bone of this country will never EVER forget the iron lady, Thatcher who plundered our industires, stole our milk! savaged the miners...VAMPIRE,HEARTLESS...we dont want her.
@necro965 he is allowed to express himself, but if his views are homophobic he won't win votes, as a result of this he won't express his opinion. It would be better if politicians tell the truth so we know who we are
They can do it because they decide who is top of the list (and gets elected) and who is at the bottom (and does not).
We don't choose who is elected at the parliament, we just give more weight to a pre-compiled list where (take it or leave it) we get people already sorted in order of how much they please the party, not the people.
If we become a democracy, all those people will go home for good.
Surprising that Cameron doesn't understand about gays as his govt is full of shirt lifters and pillow biters : William Hague, Liam Fox and loads of other cunts
@AlizeCiz And fuck you :), im laughing at you for being angry and my life is brilliant, you 0 gay guy 1, if i get hate comments i will report you to the police no questions.
Uh why don't they just change down some of the uni courses to other levels of education, like an alternative education system that's cheaper and more accessible, uni was never originally intended for everyone, it use to be a select few, obviously times have changed, maybe the education system should do.
And remember, if the government isn't technically paying for anything, your fellow tax payers are. Don't take what you're not prepared to give.
@gulbirk I agree. I support the conservatives and I'm gay. But at the end of the day, the whole idea of religion, is very conservative (not in relation to the party), meaning it doesn't really agree with homosexuality.
I think it would be unfair on the religion if they were forced to sabotage their beliefs to cater for the gays. Everyone needs to be equal in the eyes of the law, and this applies to those 'travellers' as well who seem to have immunity to the laws on taxes etc.
@EthanR666 Like that awesome equality Labor provided in Iraq, Afghanistan. Equality of death, poverty and destruction. Mmmmmmm. ^^ Also old Labour is just about dead, forced equality is on the out. ^^
@MrAlpruitt so are you for equality or against it? because your comment shows points for both, if you stay in the middle of the road, be prepared to get ran over from both directions.
@MuslimFuckJew Is this like that Bush dichotomy? "Your either with us or against us". Also, I don't know any Zionistic Jewbags complaining about death, poverty and destruction in the middle east...do you?
I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out that the people your supporting aren't actually acting for your beliefs....e.g equality.
@MrAlpruitt i already think everyone has equality to an extent that's not really the issue, the only reason i dont want the tories in office is because of the student fees, they are stopping students from poorer areas getting into university, and thus more students from rich areas get in, widening the gap between rich and poor.
and tony blair had the right idea, he just did it all wrong
@MuslimFuckJew Really? Even with the higher fees, I was under the impression that government still provides very favorable student loans? Is that not the case? Do you think it is realistic in the current economy to not have higher fees? Lets say the keep the fees. Should spending on education be reduced? If not, then who should pay?
Do you know of anyone has trouble paying for shoes? What if education was produced and sold like shoes, wouldn't it be cheaper? Does everyone need to go to uni?
@MrAlpruitt if the government think that a £9000 fee, will not impact the poorer students opportunities, they are arrogant and deluded, it's bad enough having to pay back the student loans, but paying back an extra £9000 on top of that, is a fee that could last a lifetime.
and in relation to your questions, no i dont think an extra £9000 is realistic and the government should pay for the students of working class to go to uni, not the students themselves.
@MuslimFuckJew Where will the government get the money from? That the fundamental question your ignoring, it doesn't spring from thin air. UK is already suffering from inflation, so printing money is not the answer. Your already suffering from a recession so to borrow money or tax more would only crowd out and help retard economic growth.
@MuslimFuckJew So the struggling family during a recession should pay for it? Money doesn't come from thin air, it comes from somewhere. Your not thinking it through.
What makes it right that someone else should be forced to pay for your education? Don't you feel guilty about that?
@MrAlpruitt the government should fund them out of tax payers money,
do i know anyone who has trouble paying for shoes? yes i do
"what if education was produced and sold like shoes, wouldn't it be cheaper?" i honestly have no idea what you are talking about, seriously wtf are you talking about,
and your next question is as pointless as me asking "Does everyone need to be asian?" and it makes a similar amount of sense to that question,
and the answer to both of those nonsensical question is no
@MuslimFuckJew Really? You know people that are unable to acquire shoes. I don't recall ever having seen a homeless person that didn't even posses shoes. You can buy shoes at a charity shop for nothing.
When I refer to shoes, my point is, that the government doesn't subsidize shoe production, yet essentially everyone in western society has shoes, of all kinds and sizes. Why is that? Yet government services tend be costly and inefficient. Hint hint ;) government is making education expensive
Cameron is a vile, nasty piece of work, wasn't interested in the riots, just upset he had to return from holiday early, sending disabled people out to find work and cutting their benefits, supporting that guilty bloke at the news of the world.
He's experienced enough to know that instead of being scatter brained when you can't think of a good answer, just agree with everything the other guy is saying...
" Did you choose to be attracted to women over men, or do you simply believe that it is normal because the best method of reproduction happily aligns with a drive you've had since you were sexually aware?" THEIR IS NO BEST WAY OF REPRODUCTION....ONLY ONE. I AGREE THAT GAY PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT AS STRAIGHT BUT LETS NOT IGNORE FACTS TO AVOID THE RISKOF OFFENDING ANYONE
@urtv1 cannabalism, incest and pack-hunting also occurs among natural species, does that make it right? Animals have no conscience, soul or sense of morality, so will inevitably act upon instinct feelings. Us humans were gifted with a conscience by God so therefore are obliged to serve in the interests of our Lord who declares same sex relationships as sinful, regardless of our natural instinct. Thank you for your constructive argument in your post, contrast to most other posts.
@MrEnlighteneddespot All of those are interesting points, but you'll have to prove them scientifically for their to be any reasonable basis to your argument.
@idunnoabc I accept his belief. I won't accept that it is a rational argument until it can be proven, however. That isn't narrow-mindedness, just good reason. If your argument cannot be validated at every stage, it is invalid. Is that so difficult to understand? It would be narrow-minded to state that I would not accept his belief, no matter what. Given a rational basis for his belief, I may even be persuaded to think similarly. Think before matching fragments of glass to a particular stone.
@VALENTINEBEAMS Look. Your obviously a clever/thoughtful guy, and although we disagree on this subject, I would find it interesting to talk further on it. I can't stand using YouTube to chat though, so i'll leave you be! :P
What I said is pure logic. If a british man becomes gay, a british woman loses one chance to get a british (white) husband. Then she probably will have to marry a black or an hindu.
@Churruminonian "An hindu"???? I believe it's "A Hindu." You are a troll because you are posting something intentionally offensive just so you can get a reaction.
Just cut the foolish comments my friend, your not making any sense. Lets get something straight, if you suffer from same-sex attraction you need to seek the help of the Lord and resist the temptation to act upon those feelings. Gay sex, relationships, rights, marriage, adoption are all horrendously abominable elements which plague our society and defy the word of our Lord God, so stop trying to sugar-coat sin. Married gay men are not bisexual, just resisting temptation.
@MrEnlighteneddespot You cannot tell people that, you simply cannot. There is NO proof God exists, to assume your beliefs are objective is arrogant. Believe what you want, but don't force it upon others.
You are clearly ignorant of the word of the God to call me a bigot. And just because Hitler was married for one day to a woman doesn't necessarily make him straight. How many married men out there are indeed practicing homosexuals?
@slipknot4853 Somebody is only a bigot if they are narrow-minded, prejudice and hateful. I for one disaprove entirely of gay and am not the least bit bigotted. I see homosexual sex for what it is, an abominable, unconventional and blasphemous sin which is unclean and undermines natural law. And by the way, Hitler didn't hate gays- one of his closest allies Ernst Rohm was gay and their are some allegations that Hitler was gay. He attacked them to improve his party and national image.
@MrEnlighteneddespot Homosexuality occurs in nature, therefore it is natural. Though I disagree with you, I respect your views and do not think you're a bigot, due to the fact that you disagree with homosexuality on the grounds of religion.
thats wouldnt have been so bad if the interviewer didnt exploit his mistake in what he was saying. i vote labour but i still think this is totally unfair on cameron.
If Cameron just told the truth when he talked, he would never have to think, backtrack or slowly answer. When you speak the truth, you can answer questions straight away.
When you have to think about it, you'll eventually end up like this video or you'll be rambling.
@idricool 1) Homosexuality regularly occurs in nature. 2) Darwinism prescribes no moral imperatives. 3) Darwinism is an outdated theory of evolution. 4) Are you opposed to aircraft, as well?
Homosexuality is wrong in every way. Its not even about religion or faith or belief, its just biologically wrong! Why do humans always have to go against the natural order of things and then try to justify it? What the hell is this world coming to =/
Homosexuality is natural. Every animal known to humans has homosexuals in its species.
Also Homosexuality has been scientifically proven to be natural. I know that in males it’s due to a lack of testosterone at a certain stage in pregnancy.
@EloraSmith You put your finger on the button when you said that. Every ANIMAL known to humans. I am not an animal. You are not an animal. God created angels with intellect and no desires. God created animals with desires and no intellect, hence their homosexuality sometimes. God created human beings with both intellect and desires. Maybe some people are naturally gay, just like some people naturally like to kill, that doesn't mean you do it. Please, think about it logically, that's all i ask.
@TheIrisOfMyEyes What I was responding to was you saying it’s not natural. I was saying homosexuality is natural.
It’s against the law to murder someone else; it’s not against the law to be gay
Also you say it’s not about religion but seeing as you mentioned God a few times in your last comment I think it is. Your dislike (maybe hatred?) of gays is down to what you’ve heard from religion.
@EloraSmith First of all, I mentioned God because I was replying to your statement of being gay is natural and trying to use animals as an example to back it up. Whether there is a creator or not, we all agree that we have intellect and animals do not, and if they do it is minuscule. Second of all, the law is not supreme. Hitler had laws against Jews, that didn't make them correct. It really hasn't got to do with my religion, I just find it morally wrong, whether they believe in a God or not.
@TheIrisOfMyEyes When comparing humans with other animals you mentioned God when there was no need to (at least in my opinion).
That’s why I think your religion has greatly influenced your opinion on this.
I’m yet to meet a homophobic atheist.
And how is it morally wrong? If I have informed and consented sex with someone of the same gender then I’m not doing any harm to anyone. Therefore it’s not morally wrong.
@EloraSmith You see it is doing harm to others around them. When they begin to behave irrationally then it destroys a liberal society that runs on morale and natural law. Also, I mentioned God because I wanted to give an example on intellect and desire, not because I needed to. I have many atheist friends who are homophobic. Do not forget that most people were alienated towards homosexuality until Gay's began campaigning for it under the title of "human rights" when it was "animal rights".
Me sleeping with another person of the same gender doesn’t hurt anyone around me. If anything me being myself will make me happier and be kinder to those around me.
Gay people are humans. All Humans disserve rights as long as they are not hurting anyone else.
And All the homophobic people I have met were religious.
@TheIrisOfMyEyes Sorry, could you please clarify this for me? Do you mean to say that homosexuality is doing harm to others? Do you also suggest that homosexual behaviour is irrational? Or is this in relation to another argument?
Also, I would suggest that your friends are only atheist in that they do not believe in a higher being. This is not to say they do not conform to religious principles. Indeed, homophobic notions arise SOLELY because of religion. Nothing else.
You can see Cameron thinking: "Fuck fuck fuck, I'm bang to bloody rights here...must escape somehow." lol
PaulusAlone 1 day ago
This is what happens when you allow Bronze Age fairy tales to dictate how we treat other human beings. There shouldn't even be a debate over the 'rights and wrongs' of gay marriage. THERE ARE NO WRONGS. The opposition to it may throw up bullshit arguments about how a kid needs a Mum and Dad, but the real reason is always and only JESUS HATES FAGGOTS. It's no longer OK to burn witches at the stake, but Christian hate will never die where gays are concerned. And that's all it is - hate.
ProjectFlashlight612 1 week ago
Human rights / human wrongs . We're all here to live our lives the way we choose and to receive the results ( or the consequences ) of what we choose to do . If people have the right to promote and protect a gay lifestyle without criticism then others should have a right to promote and protect a non-gay lifestyle too and not be labelled ' homophobic ' because of it . We've all got the same rights (and wrongs ) to deal with .. and let's all remember we don't just live in sin - sin lives in us .
jeffhack09 1 week ago
I can't believe we even have to debate this... There is nothing 'wrong' with being gay!!!
MrLondoner10 2 weeks ago
There is bigger issues atm, nobody is arresting people based on their sexual endeavours. Civil partnership is offered to everybody. Perhaps an improvement in employment rights and tax reform will have a greater effect on more people.
fackincappatea 2 weeks ago
0:57 think DC just guffed
neversurreder793 3 weeks ago
WOW THAT WAS DISASTROUS HE COMPLETELY BROKE DOWN GUESS HE WAS HAVING HOMOSEXUAL THOUGHTS ABOUT SUCKING THE BANKERS DICK
bugzak47 1 month ago
Politicians hate questions regarding homosexuality.
SirAbdulle 1 month ago
I'm from the U.S. and I find this strange and sad. You don't have freedom of conscious in Europe anymore? Because you merely don't support homosexual relationships you're subject to lawful consequence?
What the heck happened over there?! Thought and language as a criminal act, do the English really support this???
Jblod240 1 month ago
@Jblod240 "do the English really support this???"
Everyone does, and everyone thinks it's an outrage that that law is practically never enforced.
BlueCosmology 5 days ago
Public law is is just that and so long as not on public ground no parliamentary act applies. As when not on public ground I can not break a law I do not believe in.
THE UK IS NOT COMMUNISM YOU CAN VOTE FOR,
NemesisOfStan 1 month ago
For example cannabis has never been illegal to grow so long as public accessibility can only be achieved by breaking into private grounds, and that is not where it ends with the UK Government. As morality reins supreme in the supreme court extradition orders which don't require evidence are illegal as one's belief can not be used in legal proceedings.
A REVOLUTION IS UPON US!!!!
We are legion!
We do not forgive!
We do not forget!
Expect us!
NemesisOfStan 1 month ago
Was he having an off-day? As someone who has spoken publicly about contentious issues on numerous occasions, I understand the need to choose one's words wisely, but Cameron comes across as simply unprepared, as if he never even thought about this subject.
yeahumno88 2 months ago
David Cameron has changed his stance on gay rights, and has a new record of supporting them.
nikothedog 2 months ago
So much forehead. So little face.
rosyvivien 2 months ago
He's human, he forgets things and gets grumbled up. The Conservatives do have more gay politicians an any other party
NGE0001 2 months ago 2
Many people who consider themselves homosexual or "gay" choose to build their identity around that particular behavior, that one aspect of their lives.
They confuse their sexual behavior with their sense of self, so that if anyone disapproves of their behavior (homosexuality) then it's seen as a personal attack.
The word "homosexual" is more accurate than the word "gay" because it actually describes the behavior/relationship being discussed.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
@lightandbeautiful What the hell are you talking about, that made no sense whatsoever, were you smoking crack when you typed this bullshit. What particular Behaviour are you referring too ? Homosexuals or "they" as you refer don't confuse anything and they don't build their identity around anything other than themselves. If that was an attempt to sound intelligent you failed on a massive scale.
Azureecosse 2 months ago 3
@Azureecosse he/she is a moron and i have no clue what they are talking about for 99% of that, BUT i do know what he means with the top line, i know 1 gayman who doesnt have anything in his life other than 'gay things'.
he will only:
see gay films,
go to gay bars,
talkabout tv shows with gay men in them, if you mention something he will bring it around to how it is 'gay' he doesn't have anything else in his life such as hobbies etc, but i don't know ANY other gay men like that
whale0melette 2 months ago
@lightandbeautiful How many LGBT people do you know, just out of curiosity? How many have you actually talked to at length? I'm gay, and have many LGBT friends, and we all have careers, hobbies, and a diverse number of political causes we care about. As for your other comments, it seems to me that YOU are the one overly concerned with our sexuality, as people like you are seemingly pathologically obsessed with attacking us because of it, when we would just like to be treated like equal citizens.
yeahumno88 2 months ago
Comment removed
NatDemUK 2 months ago
Comment removed
NatDemUK 2 months ago
Gay "rights" is a hoax and a scandalous agenda! Equality does not exist either.
NatDemUK 2 months ago 3
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "gay" has helped homosexual activists push their dishonest agenda on unsuspecting people.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
@lightandbeautiful, your abject dishonesty belies your irrational anti-gay agenda.
GodCreatesGays2 2 months ago
@GodCreatesGays2
My comment below was neither "dishonest" nor "anti-gay".
Again, the word "gay", according to famous atheist Richard Dawkins, was "hijacked" by "homosexual activists". Those are his words, in context. I have the short one-minute video clip on my channel, and you can watch it for yourself.
The word "homosexual" is more accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the attraction/behavior/relationshiop being discussed.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
@lightandbeautiful, of course you will allege anything you have to, in order to spread your anti-gay agenda. That is understood. I'm just pointing out that anyone educated and rational won't fall for it.
GodCreatesGays2 2 months ago
@GodCreatesGays2 i don't think he is anti gay, just a little silly.
I think i can sort of see what he is saying, i think he means homosexual is the term for same sex relationships whereas 'gay' has come to be used to discribe the scene(in his eyes)?
like you wouldn't say 'i'm going to a homosexual bar' you say 'gay bar' because it's a term that encompasses the whole scene.
thats the best sence i can make of it, so if it's not that then i have no fucking idea what he is on about
whale0melette 2 months ago
everyone knows the conservatives don't exactly go hand in hand with the aspirations of the common people. but we also have to understand that the only reason we need them to begin with is because labour is corrupt. the way they spend money is as if we found our wealth is a bin bag. we should not be irresponsible with discipline like the conservatives, or just damn right foolish like labour. labour created the grounds for this economical crisis in UK. we should have been like France and Germany.
TheScienceofnature 2 months ago
UK is a fag nation? I mean, you have to practice anal sex or support anal sex in order to have a job in the goverment?
Call me old fashioned but i prefer sex between a man and a woman.
antinazicholos5 2 months ago
@antinazicholos5 because you are straight!!!!!!! haha Gays prefer the other way around. Nobody wants you think anyway, just respect other individuals. Equal human rights, nothing more!
lukosius1221 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lukosius1221
READ THIS
liberals supports homosexuals AND PEDOPHILIA
the ACLU members are libruls
the ACLU says NAMBLA have the right to teach the American ppl how to have sex with children. If you say this is not supporting pedophilia, then wtf is this?
antinazicholos5 2 months ago
In 60 years from now when it could be be legal to have sex with an animal or child i guess i'd be seen as old fashioned.
seanrlynch76 2 months ago
Comment removed
ttiiyy 2 months ago
@seanrlynch76 polygamy could come first, then pedophilia, the age of consent will be reduced gradually, i dont think liberals will support bestiality ever because many of them are animal rights activists, its hard to believe but liberals have morals too.
antinazicholos5 2 months ago
@seanrlynch76 you are such a moron. How do you compare two people having sex and animal and a human?
lukosius1221 2 months ago
What is the position about HUMAN RIGHTS - do they not count?
No Human Rights exist in the Crown Dependency of JERSEY - outside the UK - but a constituent part of the British Isles - the Number ONE Tax Haven - Britain ensures NO Human Rights in that CORRUPT island where the ex senior Crown Officer was Governor of the Public Sector Home Haut de la Garenne where the most senior Judge oversaw the Paedophile paradise of a Public Sector home. His younger brother protected him as AttorneyGeneral.
youfreemasonry 3 months ago
God forbid MPs get to vote with their own conscience. It's called democracy you idiots. Do you really want leaders dictating to their MPs how to vote?
You people wouldn't know democracy if it hit you in the face.
historypoliticsbb 3 months ago
@historypoliticsbb "it's a *type of* democracy"
democracy is a group of theories and =/= free for all
TheBluePianist 2 months ago
@TheBluePianist Bottom line is people commenting here think Cameron would wrong to allow a free vote. That's dictatorial, a free vote would be far more democratic.
historypoliticsbb 2 months ago
@historypoliticsbb
as a scale between dictatorial and democratic, then yes, and it is morally wrong, since the morality of the subject is independent. this is why we have rights (are liberal) in our democracy, and voting on a subject relating to the right would go against the system.
TheBluePianist 2 months ago
@TheBluePianist Don't quite get your point, are you for a free vote, yes or no?
historypoliticsbb 2 months ago
@historypoliticsbb me? i'm no different. it depends on the situation, usually yes. in these cases no.
TheBluePianist 2 months ago
@TheBluePianist So you're for democracy when it suits you. So was Stalin.
historypoliticsbb 2 months ago
@historypoliticsbb no, i'm for a particular system that i feel is the best. no voting on human rights w/e
TheBluePianist 2 months ago
@TheBluePianist So who will decide 'human rights' then? The lobbyists and the powerful banking and corporate backers of the politicians? The European Commission? The UN?
historypoliticsbb 2 months ago
david cameron is incompetent and a liar
haz464 3 months ago 38
@haz464 all politicians are liars, robbing each country for the elite rich powerful families, they are taking away our basic rights who said they could own all the land water and air and decide what they can pollute ,destroy. everyone should be held accountable from the london rioters(4yrs for a bottle of water) to the banks and big corporations (400trillion anyone?) this planet is being destroyed not because of too many people but due to the few greedy kleptomaniacs running the show
SuperHollywood38 2 months ago
david cameron is a 100% cunt
Adeel2k11 3 months ago 54
@Adeel2k11 Yes and we'll all keep voting for people like him forever.
EllyMcCormack 1 month ago
@Adeel2k11
No wonder gay people dislike him.
ThomasMoar 1 month ago
@Adeel2k11 yup... thats just diamond dave 4 u
Uforix12 1 month ago
I think he is for gay rights it's just he was so used to giving Politician answers of not guaranteeing anything.
It's a shame, I think a PM should be clear about where they stand and what they are saying
SRPC21 3 months ago
I support conservatives, but fancy going to an interview where the topic is likely to be gay rights and not knowing an answer, he's as useless as those Labour MPs and Liberal nutters.
They need to give a fucking honest answer not all this 'NOT SURE, DUNNO SORRY ILL THINK OF SOMETHING'
for a PM that is unacceptable!
ForeverComplaining 3 months ago
All the focus of the interview is on how the reply sounds, not answering the questions about the vote. Yet another proof, if needed, that they don't care about the content, just the appearances and getting re-elected.
MrThisismyuserid 3 months ago
@MrThisismyuserid Exactly. But this is what the british public want - fake people pleasers.
They don't want someone like Margaret Thatcher who isn't affraid to speak their minds regardless of the trouble it will cause them.
The public want someone like David or Harriet Harmon who are just people pleasers and there's no point in having people like that in parliament!
ForeverComplaining 3 months ago
@ForeverComplaining We dont want someone like Margeret Thatcher becasue she was a cold hearted vampire and the working class, back bone of this country will never EVER forget the iron lady, Thatcher who plundered our industires, stole our milk! savaged the miners...VAMPIRE,HEARTLESS...we dont want her.
Imoteph 3 months ago
lol that was hilarious
JagjeetMann 3 months ago
Hes too scared to say what he wants because he will be called a Homophobe. Or some other silly term that doesn't mean shit.
If he isn't alowed to express himself, then whats the point of an interview?
necro965 4 months ago
@necro965 he is allowed to express himself, but if his views are homophobic he won't win votes, as a result of this he won't express his opinion. It would be better if politicians tell the truth so we know who we are
voting for.
Mastikno1 4 months ago
@Mastikno1 I agree.
But i dont think any politicians tell us the Whole truth. There are alot of politics that never reach the public ear.
necro965 3 months ago
@necro965 too true, i know this is off subject but you might be interested in taking a look at this jubileedebtcampaign
Mastikno1 3 months ago
@Mastikno1 oh but add a ww. and .org.uk in there as it wouldn't let me send a link
Mastikno1 3 months ago
His digging a hole for himself
gooders1002 4 months ago
cameron is such a hypocrite
he does know much about the topic and then goes on to threaten africans to cut their foreign aid
yao052 4 months ago
Jesus, completely floundering...
justme6263 4 months ago
When the parties have a 'whip' (forcing all MPS in their party to vote a certain way), people call it undemocratic.
Jamessssy 4 months ago
@Jamessssy
They can do it because they decide who is top of the list (and gets elected) and who is at the bottom (and does not).
We don't choose who is elected at the parliament, we just give more weight to a pre-compiled list where (take it or leave it) we get people already sorted in order of how much they please the party, not the people.
If we become a democracy, all those people will go home for good.
MrThisismyuserid 3 months ago
Surprising that Cameron doesn't understand about gays as his govt is full of shirt lifters and pillow biters : William Hague, Liam Fox and loads of other cunts
TheKenfig 4 months ago
Comment removed
ForeverComplaining 4 months ago
what...an...idiot...
TheDarkArts49 4 months ago
Gay so stupid, It should be illegal
thegapshow 4 months ago
@thegapshow Who cares what a small little person like you thinks, pass the sick bucket.
FrankieUKK 4 months ago
@FrankieUKK Gay yuk!!!!!! ''pervert''
thegapshow 4 months ago
fuck gays.
AlizeCiz 4 months ago
@AlizeCiz And fuck you :), im laughing at you for being angry and my life is brilliant, you 0 gay guy 1, if i get hate comments i will report you to the police no questions.
FrankieUKK 4 months ago
Uh why don't they just change down some of the uni courses to other levels of education, like an alternative education system that's cheaper and more accessible, uni was never originally intended for everyone, it use to be a select few, obviously times have changed, maybe the education system should do.
And remember, if the government isn't technically paying for anything, your fellow tax payers are. Don't take what you're not prepared to give.
MrHencethename 4 months ago
I am sorta libertarian in this way. Everyone should have the RIGHT to get married. But its up to the priest if he wants to marry someone.
I mean if we respect peoples rights, we must also respect the priests right.
gulbirk 5 months ago
Comment removed
ForeverComplaining 4 months ago
Comment removed
ForeverComplaining 4 months ago
@gulbirk I agree. I support the conservatives and I'm gay. But at the end of the day, the whole idea of religion, is very conservative (not in relation to the party), meaning it doesn't really agree with homosexuality.
I think it would be unfair on the religion if they were forced to sabotage their beliefs to cater for the gays. Everyone needs to be equal in the eyes of the law, and this applies to those 'travellers' as well who seem to have immunity to the laws on taxes etc.
ForeverComplaining 4 months ago
Cameron has no clue about equality. He's a bloody tory, he doesnt do equality.
Labour forever!!!! Labour Love <3
EthanR666 5 months ago
@EthanR666 Like that awesome equality Labor provided in Iraq, Afghanistan. Equality of death, poverty and destruction. Mmmmmmm. ^^ Also old Labour is just about dead, forced equality is on the out. ^^
MrAlpruitt 5 months ago
@MrAlpruitt so are you for equality or against it? because your comment shows points for both, if you stay in the middle of the road, be prepared to get ran over from both directions.
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
@MuslimFuckJew Is this like that Bush dichotomy? "Your either with us or against us". Also, I don't know any Zionistic Jewbags complaining about death, poverty and destruction in the middle east...do you?
I'm not taking sides here. I'm just pointing out that the people your supporting aren't actually acting for your beliefs....e.g equality.
MrAlpruitt 5 months ago
@MrAlpruitt i already think everyone has equality to an extent that's not really the issue, the only reason i dont want the tories in office is because of the student fees, they are stopping students from poorer areas getting into university, and thus more students from rich areas get in, widening the gap between rich and poor.
and tony blair had the right idea, he just did it all wrong
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
@MuslimFuckJew Really? Even with the higher fees, I was under the impression that government still provides very favorable student loans? Is that not the case? Do you think it is realistic in the current economy to not have higher fees? Lets say the keep the fees. Should spending on education be reduced? If not, then who should pay?
Do you know of anyone has trouble paying for shoes? What if education was produced and sold like shoes, wouldn't it be cheaper? Does everyone need to go to uni?
MrAlpruitt 5 months ago
@MrAlpruitt if the government think that a £9000 fee, will not impact the poorer students opportunities, they are arrogant and deluded, it's bad enough having to pay back the student loans, but paying back an extra £9000 on top of that, is a fee that could last a lifetime.
and in relation to your questions, no i dont think an extra £9000 is realistic and the government should pay for the students of working class to go to uni, not the students themselves.
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
@MuslimFuckJew Where will the government get the money from? That the fundamental question your ignoring, it doesn't spring from thin air. UK is already suffering from inflation, so printing money is not the answer. Your already suffering from a recession so to borrow money or tax more would only crowd out and help retard economic growth.
LoweLeif 5 months ago
@MuslimFuckJew So the struggling family during a recession should pay for it? Money doesn't come from thin air, it comes from somewhere. Your not thinking it through.
What makes it right that someone else should be forced to pay for your education? Don't you feel guilty about that?
LoweLeif 5 months ago
@MrAlpruitt the government should fund them out of tax payers money,
do i know anyone who has trouble paying for shoes? yes i do
"what if education was produced and sold like shoes, wouldn't it be cheaper?" i honestly have no idea what you are talking about, seriously wtf are you talking about,
and your next question is as pointless as me asking "Does everyone need to be asian?" and it makes a similar amount of sense to that question,
and the answer to both of those nonsensical question is no
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
@MuslimFuckJew Really? You know people that are unable to acquire shoes. I don't recall ever having seen a homeless person that didn't even posses shoes. You can buy shoes at a charity shop for nothing.
When I refer to shoes, my point is, that the government doesn't subsidize shoe production, yet essentially everyone in western society has shoes, of all kinds and sizes. Why is that? Yet government services tend be costly and inefficient. Hint hint ;) government is making education expensive
LoweLeif 5 months ago
@MrAlpruitt You Zionistic Jewbag!
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
Cameron is a vile, nasty piece of work, wasn't interested in the riots, just upset he had to return from holiday early, sending disabled people out to find work and cutting their benefits, supporting that guilty bloke at the news of the world.
COMPLETE AND UTTER CUNT
Rob23 5 months ago 2
Problem is,he had too many hot muffins whilst at Eton!
Thurstonsfunfair 5 months ago
@Theliberty411 i was bored lol
MrFraser455 5 months ago
@Theliberty411 its a joke, fucktard
MrFraser455 5 months ago
Disastrous?! That is an understatement!
Abs786786 5 months ago
how do you tell if a guys gay? look at the size of their poo!!
MrFraser455 5 months ago
And this is the UK Prime Minister Ladies and Gentlemen!
Abs786786 5 months ago
@Abs786786 That's why I'm moving to Mars
kingofthemods89 5 months ago
@Abs786786 That's why I'm moving to Mars
kingofthemods89 5 months ago
I just read some of the comments. My contempt for religion has been enforced.
PastafariansWON 6 months ago
Should have got William Hague to do this interview, he knows a lot about gay culture. Lol.
jimmybloodyjimmy 6 months ago 2
@jimmybloodyjimmy Lol
MuslimFuckJew 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how stupid are you David Cameron?
Irresponsible! (Mind Control.)
squall8040 6 months ago
haha whats the matter cameron? too busy thinking about your secret gay partner lol. your pathetic.
eldrickw00ds 6 months ago
See what has happened to our Great Country Check Out THE PARTY OF SLEAZE by TOKYO ROSE
Tokyorosebiz 7 months ago
@Soundgarden8497 So, civil rights aren't important unless they affect you?
fff275 7 months ago
@fff275 Oh hush, they have a point. In this country there is such thing as a civil partnership, it's not a government issue it's a CHURCH one.
darkieschmuckie 6 months ago
WHO CARES? GAY MARRIAGE IS THE LEAST IMPORTANT ISSUE AT THE MOMENT
Soundgarden8497 7 months ago
He's experienced enough to know that instead of being scatter brained when you can't think of a good answer, just agree with everything the other guy is saying...
MisterScottishPerson 7 months ago
Scatter brained...
2010dispencer 7 months ago
All these morons voting for the major parties xD tooools
JamesGod08 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" Did you choose to be attracted to women over men, or do you simply believe that it is normal because the best method of reproduction happily aligns with a drive you've had since you were sexually aware?" THEIR IS NO BEST WAY OF REPRODUCTION....ONLY ONE. I AGREE THAT GAY PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE EVERY RIGHT AS STRAIGHT BUT LETS NOT IGNORE FACTS TO AVOID THE RISKOF OFFENDING ANYONE
bluegrinder84 7 months ago
@urtv1 cannabalism, incest and pack-hunting also occurs among natural species, does that make it right? Animals have no conscience, soul or sense of morality, so will inevitably act upon instinct feelings. Us humans were gifted with a conscience by God so therefore are obliged to serve in the interests of our Lord who declares same sex relationships as sinful, regardless of our natural instinct. Thank you for your constructive argument in your post, contrast to most other posts.
MrEnlighteneddespot 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot All of those are interesting points, but you'll have to prove them scientifically for their to be any reasonable basis to your argument.
VALENTINEBEAMS 8 months ago
@VALENTINEBEAMS He has to prove his belief for you to accept it? How very narrow minded
idunnoabc 8 months ago
@idunnoabc I accept his belief. I won't accept that it is a rational argument until it can be proven, however. That isn't narrow-mindedness, just good reason. If your argument cannot be validated at every stage, it is invalid. Is that so difficult to understand? It would be narrow-minded to state that I would not accept his belief, no matter what. Given a rational basis for his belief, I may even be persuaded to think similarly. Think before matching fragments of glass to a particular stone.
VALENTINEBEAMS 8 months ago
@VALENTINEBEAMS What do you mean by proven? I presume you mean something you can taste, touch, smell, hear or see?
idunnoabc 8 months ago
@VALENTINEBEAMS Look. Your obviously a clever/thoughtful guy, and although we disagree on this subject, I would find it interesting to talk further on it. I can't stand using YouTube to chat though, so i'll leave you be! :P
Cya
idunnoabc 8 months ago
A gay british man means a british woman marrying a black!
So gay is FUCKING WRONG!!!!!!
gays should be punished! Hitler was right!
Churruminonian 8 months ago
@Churruminonian If you want to be a good troll, at least try to be convincing!
urtv1 8 months ago
@urtv1 uh, troll? why?
What I said is pure logic. If a british man becomes gay, a british woman loses one chance to get a british (white) husband. Then she probably will have to marry a black or an hindu.
Churruminonian 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Churruminonian "An hindu"???? I believe it's "A Hindu." You are a troll because you are posting something intentionally offensive just so you can get a reaction.
urtv1 8 months ago
@Churruminonian ZzzzZZzzZ
idunnoabc 8 months ago
Just cut the foolish comments my friend, your not making any sense. Lets get something straight, if you suffer from same-sex attraction you need to seek the help of the Lord and resist the temptation to act upon those feelings. Gay sex, relationships, rights, marriage, adoption are all horrendously abominable elements which plague our society and defy the word of our Lord God, so stop trying to sugar-coat sin. Married gay men are not bisexual, just resisting temptation.
MrEnlighteneddespot 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot i am god, and you lie
i do support gays and lesbians
there goes your argument
idaman12345 6 months ago
@idaman12345 Stop worshiping your feelings and start obeying the one true God.
MrEnlighteneddespot 6 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot
Stop it. I'm not gonna tell you twice.
ccipollini1984 6 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot i am the one true god
so you should obey me
idaman12345 6 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot I am stick to death telling people that but well said anyway.
laptoplarryspc 6 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot You cannot tell people that, you simply cannot. There is NO proof God exists, to assume your beliefs are objective is arrogant. Believe what you want, but don't force it upon others.
Reunakk 5 months ago
why dont u f---n jerks below stop saying that lame word biggott im
sick of hearing bullshit like that
who wants gay men near them
lousey
SuperBoogley 8 months ago
You are clearly ignorant of the word of the God to call me a bigot. And just because Hitler was married for one day to a woman doesn't necessarily make him straight. How many married men out there are indeed practicing homosexuals?
MrEnlighteneddespot 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrEnlighteneddespot he had more than one wife
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot none because they are bisexual and they have not told their wives
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot i am not ignorant to the word of god its just dont get why god would think like that
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot if god didnt want people to be gay why didnt he just put it into our mind
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@ilikebeertoo BNP are racists and a bunch of bigotts
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@slipknot4853 Somebody is only a bigot if they are narrow-minded, prejudice and hateful. I for one disaprove entirely of gay and am not the least bit bigotted. I see homosexual sex for what it is, an abominable, unconventional and blasphemous sin which is unclean and undermines natural law. And by the way, Hitler didn't hate gays- one of his closest allies Ernst Rohm was gay and their are some allegations that Hitler was gay. He attacked them to improve his party and national image.
MrEnlighteneddespot 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot he is prejudice against gays
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot he didnt know though if hitler was gay why did he have wives
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot i personally am not gay but i feel that gay people should be aloud to be gay
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot you are bigotted if you think that way about gays if you simply said i dont like them it would have been a different story
slipknot4853 8 months ago
@MrEnlighteneddespot Homosexuality occurs in nature, therefore it is natural. Though I disagree with you, I respect your views and do not think you're a bigot, due to the fact that you disagree with homosexuality on the grounds of religion.
urtv1 8 months ago
thats wouldnt have been so bad if the interviewer didnt exploit his mistake in what he was saying. i vote labour but i still think this is totally unfair on cameron.
ubergroovy161 9 months ago
@ubergroovy161 in what way is it unfair for the interviewer to point out his mistake? have you ever watched a Paxman interview?
Toofartony 9 months ago
@ubergroovy161 That's true, it wouldn't be so bad if the interviewer didn't pick on on his mistakes!
But if he didn't how would we get a truthful answer? Boy was clearly lying :D
voidlam 9 months ago
@ubergroovy161 FUCK LABOUR!
BassChanter 8 months ago
gay people should go and cut theyer throats sick sick people
jamie123ginge 9 months ago
@jamie123ginge LOL
Pringles352 9 months ago
@jamie123ginge You do realise the irony of your comment there right?
HMlairy 9 months ago
@jamie123ginge
LOL
fail troll
sherlockfan16 9 months ago
If Cameron just told the truth when he talked, he would never have to think, backtrack or slowly answer. When you speak the truth, you can answer questions straight away.
When you have to think about it, you'll eventually end up like this video or you'll be rambling.
Oscy 10 months ago
HOMOSEXUALITY IS AGAINST DARWINISM !
idricool 10 months ago
@idricool 1) Homosexuality regularly occurs in nature. 2) Darwinism prescribes no moral imperatives. 3) Darwinism is an outdated theory of evolution. 4) Are you opposed to aircraft, as well?
VALENTINEBEAMS 8 months ago
@idricool how is it
slipknot4853 8 months ago
Homosexuality is wrong in every way. Its not even about religion or faith or belief, its just biologically wrong! Why do humans always have to go against the natural order of things and then try to justify it? What the hell is this world coming to =/
TheIrisOfMyEyes 10 months ago
@TheIrisOfMyEyes
Homosexuality is natural. Every animal known to humans has homosexuals in its species.
Also Homosexuality has been scientifically proven to be natural. I know that in males it’s due to a lack of testosterone at a certain stage in pregnancy.
EloraSmith 10 months ago
@EloraSmith You put your finger on the button when you said that. Every ANIMAL known to humans. I am not an animal. You are not an animal. God created angels with intellect and no desires. God created animals with desires and no intellect, hence their homosexuality sometimes. God created human beings with both intellect and desires. Maybe some people are naturally gay, just like some people naturally like to kill, that doesn't mean you do it. Please, think about it logically, that's all i ask.
TheIrisOfMyEyes 10 months ago
@TheIrisOfMyEyes What I was responding to was you saying it’s not natural. I was saying homosexuality is natural.
It’s against the law to murder someone else; it’s not against the law to be gay
Also you say it’s not about religion but seeing as you mentioned God a few times in your last comment I think it is. Your dislike (maybe hatred?) of gays is down to what you’ve heard from religion.
EloraSmith 10 months ago
@EloraSmith First of all, I mentioned God because I was replying to your statement of being gay is natural and trying to use animals as an example to back it up. Whether there is a creator or not, we all agree that we have intellect and animals do not, and if they do it is minuscule. Second of all, the law is not supreme. Hitler had laws against Jews, that didn't make them correct. It really hasn't got to do with my religion, I just find it morally wrong, whether they believe in a God or not.
TheIrisOfMyEyes 10 months ago
@TheIrisOfMyEyes When comparing humans with other animals you mentioned God when there was no need to (at least in my opinion).
That’s why I think your religion has greatly influenced your opinion on this.
I’m yet to meet a homophobic atheist.
And how is it morally wrong? If I have informed and consented sex with someone of the same gender then I’m not doing any harm to anyone. Therefore it’s not morally wrong.
EloraSmith 10 months ago
@EloraSmith You see it is doing harm to others around them. When they begin to behave irrationally then it destroys a liberal society that runs on morale and natural law. Also, I mentioned God because I wanted to give an example on intellect and desire, not because I needed to. I have many atheist friends who are homophobic. Do not forget that most people were alienated towards homosexuality until Gay's began campaigning for it under the title of "human rights" when it was "animal rights".
TheIrisOfMyEyes 10 months ago
@TheIrisOfMyEyes
Me sleeping with another person of the same gender doesn’t hurt anyone around me. If anything me being myself will make me happier and be kinder to those around me.
Gay people are humans. All Humans disserve rights as long as they are not hurting anyone else.
And All the homophobic people I have met were religious.
EloraSmith 10 months ago
@TheIrisOfMyEyes Sorry, could you please clarify this for me? Do you mean to say that homosexuality is doing harm to others? Do you also suggest that homosexual behaviour is irrational? Or is this in relation to another argument?
Also, I would suggest that your friends are only atheist in that they do not believe in a higher being. This is not to say they do not conform to religious principles. Indeed, homophobic notions arise SOLELY because of religion. Nothing else.
SupportEquality 10 months ago