Fuck that VON BRAUN! "Haunted by his nazi past" Oh, come on. Von Braun didn't give a shit about the nazis. He didn't care about humans at all. He cared about advancing his research and getting the fame from it. He was a sociopath and not a "haunted" man. Fuck the spin. Give me truth instead.
I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
None of the soviets or americans had won. mankind lost. by the death of those two masterminds mankind had lost. it is 2011. still 89 years to the end of this century. those two mastermind showed us the orbit, the satellite. there is phrase "beyond the limit". those two genius are two example of this "beyond the limit". think of all those matlab, autocad, pentium 4, core i7, athlon, apu. those two did not need autocad or matlab. hope by 89 years we will find another pair of those two.
At its peak in '66, NASA got less than 4.5% of the federal budget. For nearly 40 of its 53 years it got under 1%. And by the most conservative estimate, money invested on Apollo earned a 33% return. It was the smartest investment the US has ever made. Naturally we stopped doing it. All those annoying spinoff technologies...all those unneeded jobs...all those silly dreams...better to gnaw this planet bare and then die. It was raining soup, so we threw away our buckets. Who wants frontiers anyway?
@lazaruslongable I believe a lot of it has to do with basic human complacency, Also I feel it goes back to one of the most fundamental human fears: the fear of the unknown. Unfortunately us Americans are known for complacency.
@101rocketmail I don't know, I'm sure it is partially dramatized, but one would really have to delve into history to truly find out what is fact and fiction. Honestly, I think it's an amazing story either way.
@XRedburn if you use funds JUST to feed people then people will stop working for food. animals have to hunt for food. humans have to work for money so to live. if government feeds people nothing will ever work.
be glad the 2 scientist went on a space race or else you arent typing on a keyboard on a network that was initially designed to help track space craft worldwide easier, through a computer whose ancestors helped stabilize and navigate the early spacecraft.
@MrGyro04 me, you, the wall and the idiots know its impossible.... my point was that russia did things on a much smaller budget that the usa and given more funds they could have achieved much much more.
@mrmishonka: You are either really crazy or have a very poor knowledge of science. The surface of the sun is 5800K which is 5527 Celcius. That is more than enough to evaporate any spacecraft that orbits (don't event talk about landing on the sun) close to the sun even if that spacecraft is made of the best heat-withstanding material.
if sergey korolev had some years and little more technology support he would land to the mars in 1969 not to the moon. just notice that he landed to moon in 1959 and venus in 1961. he was a great mind but he was alone.
saddening, the first quest to space was based on ideological conflict. if only we could stop using our resources and efforts on war and focus on space exploration and technology.
@cosmicexplorer22 Ironically, 1 of the only positive legacies to come out the cold war were the achievements of space exploration by both sides. The intense political/ideological rivalries between the superpowers provided the impetus and resources to fuel space exploration. But in the absence of the cold war there is no longer that same political pressure to compete with each other - so unfortunately resources get diverted elsewhere
NASA wastes so much money. Space needs to be privatized and corporations need to get into the space race. If this will happen we can see the average human in space soon.
@167349productions They made it to space first, we made it to the moon first, the space race officially ended when a Soviet and American space capsule docked in space. It was a tie.
@DTanza when you say they for me it means the other way around because i'm soviet. but yes, it was a tie, but strangely after that NASA became the dominant - why? no one knows.
@167349productions Yes, we do know. The Soviet Union ran out of money to fund their space program. It's the same reason they backed out of the Cold War. Lack of funding.
@167349productions The USA won the space race fool. The soviets won the first few rounds but in the end the USA landed on the moon and have done things miles ahead of the soviets or Russians now. sorry you lose
one small victory of landing on the moon is not equal to many big victories like launching to space the first satellite, creature, human. then the first luner satellite, first satellite of mars and the first space walk.
@cwood4ever We made it to the mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn and back, we also made star wars and STAR trek hello
Fuck that VON BRAUN! "Haunted by his nazi past" Oh, come on. Von Braun didn't give a shit about the nazis. He didn't care about humans at all. He cared about advancing his research and getting the fame from it. He was a sociopath and not a "haunted" man. Fuck the spin. Give me truth instead.
fuzzynippleman 3 weeks ago
Russia thank you for winning world war 2!
mopako10 1 month ago
Ha! The Americans had everything! Even former fascists did not hesitate to draw! And we were just people, and anyway, we won!
CommyNiST94 2 months ago
if the V2 was a terror weapon, then what was the Little Boy?
00asha00 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have created a music album which charts the history of the Space Race.
Space Race by Rhesus Monkey.
The album charts the start of the Space Race with Sputnik 1957, Yuri Gagarin's first human space flight, John Glenn's Triple Orbit, Ed White's Gemini IV Space Walk, then onto Apollo.
You can view videos of three tracks from the album within my YouTube channel.
The videos include NASA archive material.
rhesusmonkey2012 2 months ago
I think they were referring to the staff at The Pentagon in the plural, hence 'The Pentagon want'. I should know. I'm British.
roystonsaxon 2 months ago
British actors! Americans would say "the Pentagon WANTS", not "the Pentagon WANT". :)
PatchesRips 3 months ago
All this USSR vs USA bickering is pointless. Just be glad that it wasn't a swastika flag on the moon.
simpsonfan13 4 months ago
@simpsonfan13 agreed.
darkdragon13891 4 months ago
None of the soviets or americans had won. mankind lost. by the death of those two masterminds mankind had lost. it is 2011. still 89 years to the end of this century. those two mastermind showed us the orbit, the satellite. there is phrase "beyond the limit". those two genius are two example of this "beyond the limit". think of all those matlab, autocad, pentium 4, core i7, athlon, apu. those two did not need autocad or matlab. hope by 89 years we will find another pair of those two.
VATkhamu 5 months ago 2
At its peak in '66, NASA got less than 4.5% of the federal budget. For nearly 40 of its 53 years it got under 1%. And by the most conservative estimate, money invested on Apollo earned a 33% return. It was the smartest investment the US has ever made. Naturally we stopped doing it. All those annoying spinoff technologies...all those unneeded jobs...all those silly dreams...better to gnaw this planet bare and then die. It was raining soup, so we threw away our buckets. Who wants frontiers anyway?
lazaruslongable 6 months ago
@lazaruslongable I believe a lot of it has to do with basic human complacency, Also I feel it goes back to one of the most fundamental human fears: the fear of the unknown. Unfortunately us Americans are known for complacency.
tdr124 5 months ago
Hitler is as smart as paint. If only he had used his smarts for something else.
101rocketmail 9 months ago
Is this sci-fic?
101rocketmail 9 months ago
@101rocketmail I don't know, I'm sure it is partially dramatized, but one would really have to delve into history to truly find out what is fact and fiction. Honestly, I think it's an amazing story either way.
eeg10 8 months ago
@101rocketmail It's all true
wabonki 8 months ago
@wabonki Wow. I didn't even think they were that advanced in stuff that went boom yet. Humans these days.
101rocketmail 7 months ago
@101rocketmail indeed
wabonki 7 months ago
una de las mejores series que he visto.....es simplemente excelente!
kurohorse 10 months ago
The BBC are still capable of producing splendid stuff.
Stinkinini 10 months ago
Billions were spent there that could be used to feed hungry children. Now aren't these politicians a piece of what you know?
XRedburn 11 months ago
@XRedburn if you use funds JUST to feed people then people will stop working for food. animals have to hunt for food. humans have to work for money so to live. if government feeds people nothing will ever work.
be glad the 2 scientist went on a space race or else you arent typing on a keyboard on a network that was initially designed to help track space craft worldwide easier, through a computer whose ancestors helped stabilize and navigate the early spacecraft.
nakazatoGTR 10 months ago 8
if russia had more money to give to the space programs russian could of landed in the moon before the U.S
MultiDas123 11 months ago
@MultiDas123 if russia had the money that nasa had they could have landed on the sun.
mrmishonka 11 months ago 28
@mrmishonka ohh come one
don´t say such silly things !!!!
it is imposible
MrGyro04 3 months ago
@MrGyro04 me, you, the wall and the idiots know its impossible.... my point was that russia did things on a much smaller budget that the usa and given more funds they could have achieved much much more.
mrmishonka 2 months ago
@mrmishonka if you think so...
i respect your opinion but in my mind the USA were technicly the number one after Korolev died !
MrGyro04 2 months ago
@mrmishonka lol, thats genius :D
YamaKazoo 3 months ago
@mrmishonka so true!
1Nekit1 2 months ago
@mrmishonka: You are either really crazy or have a very poor knowledge of science. The surface of the sun is 5800K which is 5527 Celcius. That is more than enough to evaporate any spacecraft that orbits (don't event talk about landing on the sun) close to the sun even if that spacecraft is made of the best heat-withstanding material.
BetheHans 1 month ago 2
@BetheHans No Problem! They'd have gone at night.
Alvious 1 week ago
@mrmishonka If the Germans had the money Nasa had they would already be negotiating with aliens on their home worlds
godscuttingyoudown 1 month ago
@mrmishonka And if the Russian Space Agency had as much publicity as Nasa it would have been shut down for safety violations.
njdevil281 1 week ago
if sergey korolev had some years and little more technology support he would land to the mars in 1969 not to the moon. just notice that he landed to moon in 1959 and venus in 1961. he was a great mind but he was alone.
tsontakiasful 11 months ago
saddening, the first quest to space was based on ideological conflict. if only we could stop using our resources and efforts on war and focus on space exploration and technology.
cosmicexplorer22 11 months ago
@cosmicexplorer22 Ironically, 1 of the only positive legacies to come out the cold war were the achievements of space exploration by both sides. The intense political/ideological rivalries between the superpowers provided the impetus and resources to fuel space exploration. But in the absence of the cold war there is no longer that same political pressure to compete with each other - so unfortunately resources get diverted elsewhere
Vasyukov 11 months ago
I want flying cars!!! It's 2010. They promised me flying cars!
Yseulte 1 year ago
NASA wastes so much money. Space needs to be privatized and corporations need to get into the space race. If this will happen we can see the average human in space soon.
cwood4ever 1 year ago
@akropiss yes, i know that.
please accept my friend request.
167349productions 1 year ago
@akropiss yeah i know that.
but it was first in use in 49 right?
167349productions 1 year ago
The soviet union won the race . period.
167349productions 1 year ago
@167349productions They made it to space first, we made it to the moon first, the space race officially ended when a Soviet and American space capsule docked in space. It was a tie.
DTanza 1 year ago
@DTanza when you say they for me it means the other way around because i'm soviet. but yes, it was a tie, but strangely after that NASA became the dominant - why? no one knows.
167349productions 1 year ago
@167349productions Yes, we do know. The Soviet Union ran out of money to fund their space program. It's the same reason they backed out of the Cold War. Lack of funding.
DTanza 1 year ago
@167349productions The USA won the space race fool. The soviets won the first few rounds but in the end the USA landed on the moon and have done things miles ahead of the soviets or Russians now. sorry you lose
cwood4ever 1 year ago
@cwood4ever you are wrong.
one small victory of landing on the moon is not equal to many big victories like launching to space the first satellite, creature, human. then the first luner satellite, first satellite of mars and the first space walk.
sorry to feed you s**t
167349productions 1 year ago
@167349productions Keep believing the propaganda of a dead state, you fool. The soviets won many battles but lost the war.
simpsonfan13 4 months ago
@cwood4ever If USA won why haven't we have Space Cargo ships, Battle cruisers, etc? US did not in fact won, they screw themselves over instead.
makemap 1 year ago
@cwood4ever We made it to the mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn and back, we also made star wars and STAR trek hello
cwood4ever 1 year ago
@cwood4ever they made it to space first
we made it to the moon first
all is equal
JakeL33T989 1 year ago
@cwood4ever Really like what?
RAIDEN123524 11 months ago
@cwood4ever Americans have done things miles away ahead of the soviets? Why Americans flying on the Russian Rockets like "Proton and Soyuz" ?
MrUpturbo 6 months ago
@MrUpturbo it saves money
cwood4ever 6 months ago
why does the soldier in 6:08 has an AK47?
this is an event from 1944.
the AK47 was invented in 1949.
stupid BBC
167349productions 1 year ago
@167349productions That's not AK - 47. It's PPSH 41.
xbillybrownx 1 year ago
@xbillybrownx youre correct.
SORRY BBC!
167349productions 1 year ago
Thanks for the upload can't go wrong with a bit of history and science
TheWELSHGUARD 1 year ago